No.27
Welcome back guys! As you can see we are in a new site and that brings a couple of changes. The first thing I should clarify is that I'm the owner of the board now, while Potion is the owner of the site. My intention is, at least in the start, to maintain this board in the same way that was before. BUT the possibility for some changes is present, we are in a new site after all.
So let's see how all is flowing, ok?
I only ask for patience with the new site.
And of course: ENJOY.
No.30
Also two more pictures of Alissa and Katie. Why? 'cause they're cute…
and hot of course.
No.38
I was the first one to ask to hotwheels to let potion become the new owner of /hebe/ back in the day over irc.
I m glad you got choosen to be the new board owner, congratz :)
No.47
could you make it just Anonymous?
I cringe hard everytime I read MAP
No.159
Oh, I was missing YOU guys!!!
No.160
No.172
Yay, the dancing banner is back! Always was my fave! Thanx guize
No.233
>>172
Do not know, but if you mean this dancig banner. it is LauraB & ValensiyaS in CandyDoll Video ``Gyutto Shite´´
No.235
No.277
No.278
>>277
Yay! The board owner trip works now. Also: you can make đź’— (is ": hebe :" without spaces). That's thanks to Claura.
No.291
Hebe? Why not pedo? Pedophile is the best. ;p
No.312
No.328
Welcome back, friend…!!!…Congratulations…!!!…good luck…
No.637
Hello guys, good to see you guys again, I missed :')
Well, I need your help, anyone here ever seen this set before?
This pic appears in sharechan, in Sevina thread after a flood of requests, the MOD deleted the pic and many posts. If anyone know something, please post here :D
No.791
>>27
thank you thank you for this place!
No.1250
No.1527
hooray, I found a new /hebe/ board. i am complete again.
No.1592
Board owner, do you realize your mods have been deleting NN and legal N images and links? They removed my SassyCatt samples and link and also non-sexual LS set images and link. This is turning into another 8ch except much quicker.
You suggest we email under RULES you but you didn't mention your email. Please confirm you read this.
Post last edited at
No.1601
who cares we'll all be dead and dust soon enough
No.1613
>>1592
No email. Make a thread or go to the IRC channel. But I will talk about this soon, either way.
Post last edited at
No.1731
>>1592
Ok, now I can answer this. We didn't had mods for this board. If something was deleted and it wasn't me then it was a global (we have a public LOG for this kind of situations). Sorry about that but from time to time something like that might occur again.
The good news is that now we have volunteers here. Please, be patient with them and don't freak out if they delete a post by mistake.
No.1866
>>1731
>The good news is that now we have volunteers here
That's not good news at all. Now we'll have to deal with censorship-happy global mods AND volunteers!
No.1867
>>1866
Global vols can be worse, and they wont be around as much
No.1869
>>1867
Worse or better, more vetoes means less chance for any single post to survive. I honestly don't see the point of hiring vols unless we're overrun with spam.
No.1877
Before someone ask:
I deleted the board drama because it was already old and I want the sticky available for discussion (and announcement) of the new volunteers. That was one of the last things left after the 8chan exodus. And btw that user named "KatieM" is just me with another account.
>>1866
If you don't break the rules, then you should be fine.
>>1869
We already have some guys posting CP. So this makes sense, actually.
No.2093
>>2017
i wonder how lera is doing as an adult now, has she become ugly and decayed or does her perfect genes keep up?
No.2113
>>2093
She is still a minor, only 14 I believe. And she is hot as fuck. I'll leave it to others to post the pics.
No.2461
>>2093
She's not very good but still better than most
No.3483
File: 1466097437562.jpg (140.06 KB, 736x1104, 2:3, c94c2440e9f1f8c8df00a888f8….jpg)
I find it strange that if i use Https on this site SOME media like Gifs will not come up properly yet if i use regular Http it's fine ….What's up with that ??? Is Https security not allowed or supported or something??
No.3491
>>3483
obiously this page dont allow security because is owned by fbi.
anyhing that help in your security and make things difficult for the fbi wont be allowed and https makes tracking more difficult
No.3493
>>3483
this site use a system like anonimoxso if you try anonimox extension for firefox you will know,this site wont allow the use of that extension because it makes tracking more difficult.
No.3499
>>3483
Yea, as >>3487 and >>3486 said in your other thread, the site has HSTS ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security ). All traffic is forced through https. This is likely and opsec issue on your end.
See: https://securityheaders.io/?q=https%3A%2F%2Flibrechan.net
No.3509
>>443, >>451, >>452, >>524
>But I fear for /hebe/ dying a slow death from lack of traffic and effectively falling victim to anti-paedo apartheid.
Posts – deleted. Followed by Deus vult.
So Librechan is another Nazi honeypot. So much for “libre”… Time to get the word out.
>>1592, >>1731, >>1877
>I deleted the board drama because it was already old.
Oh, I see. So who is the culprit, /hebe/ or Librechan?
And what drama are you talking about?
How were my posts “drama” and the rest of this thread isn’t?
I wonder what kind of replies I have missed.
No.3510
>>3509
what he calls drama is all the people that said librechan is owned by the fbi.
According to board owner that was drama what you miss was just proof that the site is indeed owned by fbi.
The board owner (fbi) will delete anything that proves the site is owned by fbi.
No.3511
>>3510
Interesting. Thanks.
While I acknowledge the harm of smear campaigns to innocent communities, censorship is probably a wrong way to build trust.
No.3512
>>3510
I dont think there was ever any actual proof, but just baseless accusations from shills like you. >>3511 It's very easy to spot your samefagging at this point
No.3514
Putting the question of this board’s legitimacy temporarily aside,
what might FBI actually want from paedo boards?
This or any other.
Are they after actual child porn or do they intend to harass law-abiding paedophiles, KGB-style?
No.3532
>>3514
is just harassment only and a way to force paedophiles to make something illegal normally paedophiles wont commit crimes if they have fap material (the ones that call themselves hebe but they are paedophiles in the end).
Without fap material they wont hold their need commiting a crime like raping the next door little girl or kidnapping a nearby school little girl or raping the little daughter girl friend and similar in the end everyone does it,it has happened so many times.
The thing they want is just a non trustfull source of info,thanks to internet tons of paedophiles have made manuals and similar stuff to rape little girls without being catched posted on chan sites so if they take possesion of all chans sites and everyone starts using tor the fbi will success on tracking all the paedophiles on the world (tor is hosted on fbi servers on washington) so by censoring internet they can easylly detect and catch a paedophile is the same tactic they use with hackers the only difference is that when they track down a hacker,the hacker will dissapear from the face of earth.
As i said is a good plan because if every chan is controlled the amount of fap material they will increase the ammount of child rapes for them using someone innocent to capture the criminal is just a small price
No.3536
>>3532
To be fair, I don’t mind the police controlling paedo erotica websites as long as they… don’t break the law. Sadly, I’m not sure we can trust them with that. American government agencies have a proven track record of abuse and acting above the law.
No.3537
>>3509
The deleted post were from a shill saying that this place was owned by the fbi and then creating (literally) a cp board and posting on it. He stopped when I showed that to everyone and (of course) now that the post are gone he's back.
>>3510
Nah, the only "proof" deleted was the post of the shill creating a cp board while saying that this place was a honey pot :)
No.3538
No.3564
>>3537
then why did you banned more then 40 users on 4 days
No.3565
ÂżTorrent candy doll collection?
320 gb
No.3567
You deleted more messages then what you are making it look.
Besides banning more than more then 40 people is weird because what they said was the same thing most people suspecs of this site that is owned by fbi.
Besides you this sites info says the ip is private (bellow isp provided IP) those dont have country thats is the weird stuff because it says is in netherlands but the geo location is on UK which make this site more suspicious.
There is no need to use this site as tons of europe users said this smells rotten,so why use something new when we have the old reliable krautchan.
No.3569
No.3570
No.3576
>>3564
I didn't. I made bans for things that we all know aren't allowed here. Just like before.
>>3567
>You deleted more messages then what you are making it look.
Nope. Public log, all is there.
>Besides banning more than more then 40 people is weird because what they said was the same thing most people suspecs of this site that is owned by fbi
No bans for that. Only for the shill some time ago (more than a week ago).
>Besides you this sites info says the ip is private (bellow isp provided IP) those dont have country thats is the weird stuff because it says is in netherlands but the geo location is on UK which make this site more suspicious
Magic
>There is no need to use this site as tons of europe users said this smells rotten,so why use something new when we have the old reliable krautchan
Ok, go there then? If you are going to shill just go straight to the point. We are going to stay here, just like it was in 8chan before all went to shit.
No.3577
>>3564
>>3567
>40 users in 4 days
Umm.. I dont know where you get you facts from but the ban logs only 23 people have been banned in the entire 2+ weeks. The logs are clear https://librechan.net/bans.html
No.3655
While most of us don’t think consensual child sex is evil, I think everyone realises at this point that child porn would only serve to bring this server down. It wouldn’t last. It is already banned from https://archive.is (just like 8chan once was before admin’s intervention). It’s not like there aren’t more appropriate venues for child porn for those desperate and reckless enough.
Actually, it would probably be better if the police owned this board because it would make browsing it safe for law-abiding paedophiles AND would ensure it’s not run by some violent anti-paedo vigilantes. Even Hiroyuki has announced that he would like FBI to moderate 4chan. Who can blame him?
Of course as long as they don’t start acting like KGB.
No.3679
>KatieM hidden 4 hours /hebe/ Created a new 1-week ban on /hebe/ for b90a53697e (#205) with reason: <p class="body-line ltr ">CP</p>
The hidden service was banned, not sure if intentional.
No.3686
>>3679
It seems like TOR was banned in error so i removed the ban.
Thanks for pointing that out.
No.3724
>>3679
Not sure if this helps but you cant create a ban for tor,the fact that it says 127.0.0.1 is weird,normally tor gives a random IP something like 172.64.5.3 or whatever IP available normally the browser send that IP to the website so it should be weird that it says your precise IP 127.0.0.1 because the browser sended another IP to the website.
No.3727
>>3724
It shows localhost as ip because of how hidden services work so banning localhost results in TOR being banned.
No.3740
>>3724
As a highly acclaimed anonymous, I can confirm that localhost IP as Tor outproxy is perfectly natural.
No.3762
>>3740
that is true but…
the website should read the ip assigned by tor not the 127.0.0.1.
If you are not aware that means they are using something on the site to read your IP,and bypassing the browser sended IP.
No.3769
>>3762
The only machine whose IP a Tor website can read is… its own. And that’s 127.0.0.1. There’s no way around it without compromising whole Tor – something that only the military can perhaps do. But it’s okay that you are vigilant.
>>27
Meanwhile, I want to report small bug in board configuration:
>Mixed Content: The page at 'https://librechan.net/hebe/res/27.html#q1877' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure XMLHttpRequest endpoint 'http://librechan.net/hebe/threads.json'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS.
Basically, the script that loads
>http://librechan.net/hebe/threads.json
needs to be fixed to load
>//librechan.net/hebe/threads.json
instead.
No.3774
>>3762
There is one more IP known to a Tor website: the IP of its Tor gateway. You can’t expect a hidden website to display that IP because that would help people locate it.
No.3780
>>3769
if it reads the ip 127.0.0.1 means that the site knows that you are using tor.
Normally you are given a random IP every time you start tor this has been like that since the beggining as the author said "if the site read the IP 127.0.0.1 it means your security along with everyone that uses tor is compromised,the websites should read the given proxy IP XXX.XX.XX.XX if a site reads the IP 127.0.0.1 it means your security,location and more has been compromised along with the rest of the tor users,if it reads 127.0.0.1 the website is announcing that you are a tor user"
What excuse is there besides that is weird.
If you are on tor use this site http://ipaddress.com/ to check your IP it should indicate the XXX.XX.XX.XX
No.3782
>>3780
I’m glad that you used http://ipaddress.com/ as an example. Because, you see, it’s a clearnet website. It takes Tor exit IP for your IP.
Meanwhile http://librechbtnnmzoa7.onion/ is a Tor website. There is no Tor exit in this case because everything stays on Tor. IP 127.0.0.1 means lack of IP.
No.3784
>>3780
I think I’m beginning to understand your confusion. Yes, the site knows that you are using Tor. But every website on the web knows it because Tor is not designed to hide itself. It hides your IP but it doesn’t hide the fact that you are using Tor.
No.3787
>>3780
In other words, even ipaddress.com knows that you are using Tor because all Tor exit IP addresses are publicly announced by the Tor Foundation.
No.3789
>>3769
Consider posting stuff like that to /meta/, it might not get read here
No.3793
>>3769
>>Mixed Content: The page at 'https://librechan.net/hebe/res/27.html#q1877' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure XMLHttpRequest endpoint 'http://librechan.net/hebe/threads.json'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS.
I couldn't reproduce that.
No.3803
>>3787
>>3784
>>3782
it should indicate the XXX.XX.XX.XX that is the unique IP given to anyone that use tor for example the p given to me right now is 183.221.227.218 that is the ip that tor gave to me and the one that says on http://ipaddress.com/ my real IP is way different even the geo location says im in china if you are being detected with the IP 127.0.0.1 i would reccomend a good AV a firewall and a good lawyer just in case and delete tor and redownload it again from the official site and update noscript because the one on tor is outdated.
No.3806
>>3803
>it should indicate the XXX.XX.XX.XX that is the unique IP
No. It shouldnt, because that is not how hidden services and onion domains work.
No.3808
>>3803
That XXX.XX.XX.XX is not unique, it’s a Tor exit. You exit Tor when you use ipaddress.com bcause it’s outside Tor. But you don’t exit Tor when you use libre.onion because it’s part of the Tor network. Therefore you see a placeholder IP 127.0.0.1 instead of a physical IP.
No.3809
>>3789
>/meta/
I will know next time.
>>3780
After checking again, I must admit that for some reason I’m getting it only in this single tab. Here’s a screenshot of the situation. I don’t insist on fixing it, I only wanted to let someone know.
I will try to stop discussing technical issues in this thread now.
No.3816
>>3809
Which version of Chrome is that?
No.3828
>>27
You should disable early 404.
There is no reason to have it enabled now and it's killing legit threads.
No.3859
>>3808
everyone is detected on my tor bbs with the ip XXX.XX.XX.XX so i find really weird that everyone says that is normal to be detected with 127.0.0.1.
Lets remember tor is a proxy it give you XXX.XX.XX.XX IP and you should be detected with XXX.XX.XX.XX IP while using tor on normal websites and tor sites because XXX.XX.XX.XX is relayed on other point,being detected as 127.0.0.1 is just weird besides indicating what you are using.
Try using tor and linux
No.3869
>>3859
All Hidden Service traffic appears as local loopback to the web server.. it's how Tor hidden services works.
No.3883
>>3859
I am sure that Libre.onion knows its Tor gateway IP. However, I have already explained to you that a hidden website announcing that IP to the public would make it not “hidden” anymore.
>everyone is detected on my tor bbs with the ip XXX.XX.XX.XX
Do you want to say that your “BBS” displays that IP to everybody? I can say this: with your level of understanding Tor, you shouldn’t use it because you will only shoot yourself in the foot. Well, actually do use it, because it cannot be less secure than not using it. But don't rely on it for operations that put your livelihood at stake. The same applies to anyone who thinks your objections make sense.
It seems to me that there is no harm to using Librechan with or without Tor if you aren’t involved in child porn. If you are, better get educated in Tor first. And don’t use Librechan. Any website could be “run by FBI”. Librechan is not anti-law enforcement if I’m not wrong. It’s a legal website.
No.3885
>>3816
I’d rather not report so much detail. Sorry about that.
No.3973
>>3885
Yeah because the staff is going to change the source code or someone else will seek for an exploit specifically for you based on that because obviously you're that important.
Just update your browser
No.4010
>>3973
LOL. Being unimportant is a poor security policy.
No.4011
>>4010
Being unimportant it's not a security policy in any way.
It's just an attribute that is inherent to something given the circumstances around it.
If you're actually worried about using "poor security policies" you shouldn't be using an outdated version of a software in the first place or using any proprietary software (e.g., Google Chrome).
No.4148
How do I rainbow text?
whats the BBCODE
No.4150
Well you're reporting everything to Google/Alphabet/US Gov anyway you dumb fuck
No.4749
No.5026
No.5279
Are you guys able to access anonfiles, or have something bad happened to it?
No.5743
File: 1466937519096.png (19.96 KB, 238x565, 238:565, Captura de pantalla de 201….png)
