Not 1 Hydrogen Explosion, But 2 Separate PLUTONIUM MOX Fuel Explosions At Fukushima Building #3
The official TEPCO fairy tale story about Fukushima is that there were 'only' 3 hydrogen explosions, total; at buildings 1, 2, and 3. They only admitted to three melted down reactors in these buildings, but no others, after denying anything bad happened for a total of THREE months, despite knowing it happened after a few hours. In their version of the 'story', building 4 exploded only from the hydrogen gas coming from the exploding building #3, which was just a hydrogen gas explosion. In other words, nothing happened at building 4 at all.
They also claim there were no spent fuel pool fires, and that no radiation was released from any Fukushima spent fuel pools. They claim no MOX fuel plutonium came out of anything, anywhere and that all nuclear fuel not only stayed inside containment in all structures, but that none of it caught on fire or melted out of anything, anywhere. (This is how they come up with the 10% of Chernobyl computer model). For more information on the 'best case' scenario put forward by the pro nuclear promoters see article link below.
They also claim there were no spent fuel pool fires, and that no radiation was released from any Fukushima spent fuel pools. They claim no MOX fuel plutonium came out of anything, anywhere and that all nuclear fuel not only stayed inside containment in all structures, but that none of it caught on fire or melted out of anything, anywhere. (This is how they come up with the 10% of Chernobyl computer model). For more information on the 'best case' scenario put forward by the pro nuclear promoters see article link below.
WHAT IS THE BEST CASE AND WORST CASE SCENARIO AROUND FUKUSHIMA?
Worst Case Scenario Around The Fukushima Mega Nuclear Disaster, Vs Best Case Scenario Presented By Nuclear Industry
All of the above claims consist of nothing more than a pack of 'polite' PR in your face absolutely pure best case 'estimates', which do NOT match the evidence or data at all. This article focuses on #3 reactor building and proves that 2 separate explosions happened on two separate days at this building and that plutonium MOX fuel did exit the building. Other articles will focus on the other lies and disprove them. So let's dive in...
First, Arnie Gunderson proves that multiple spent fuel pools sustained damage. He does not talk about equipment pools, but just in what he does cover, he proves that TEPCO is lying about no spent fuel pools being damaged or catching on fire. Ooops, there goes the 10% of Chernobyl radiation fairy tale, unless of course, one still believes in Santa Claus, the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny laying chocolate eggs.
HYDROGEN EXPLOSION DEMONSTRATED BY ARNIE GUNDERSON
Arnie Gunderson, a nuclear expert, demonstrates a hydrogen explosionVideo; https://youtu.be/Jhv8RyiKqWk 6 min.
The reason the OTHER explosions at Fukushima were WHITE, is due to hydrogen combining with oxygen to form water/steam/vapor in the air. Hydrogen burns with oxygen and forms H2O, water, or in small quantities, it is colorless, such as in the case above.
Steam or water vapor is WHITE. Everyone got this? It's really simple, right?
Of course, even this is not the truth, because the hydrogen coming out of a melting down reactor is radioactive, just like everything else, so it is really a radioactive hydrogen explosion.
Of course, even this is not the truth, because the hydrogen coming out of a melting down reactor is radioactive, just like everything else, so it is really a radioactive hydrogen explosion.
SLOW MOTION EXAMINATION OF FIRST BUILDING #3 EXPLOSION
3 minute slow motion analysis of explosion at building 3Video; https://youtu.be/9k3Ofs6R9cg 3 min.
As anyone can see the white water vapor from hydrogen gas exploding is down below, near the ground. That is the first explosion. Then another explosion happens.. and another..
One of the supposed 'hydrogen' explosions at Fukushima is detailed, but notice that even this is not really completely white, it is a greyish or light brown colored explosion cloud, indicating that there is more in this explosion than just hydrogen.
Video; https://youtu.be/kjx-JlwYtyE 40 seconds
At the building #3 explosion, there is a HUGE black and purple mushroom shaped cloud that goes up, just like a nuclear explosion, which comes AFTER the first WHITE water vapor producing hydrogen gas explosion, which stays down low to the ground. Remember, white equals radioactive hydrogen, but what about the black and brown cloud?
What is in that black smoke and mushroom cloud? Where pray tell, did it come from? A hot dog stand? A campfire? Or, could it be that something really bad happened at building 3 that the nuclear industry does not want anyone to know about, because it is SO BAD?
Hydrogen gas does not explode with a BLACK smoke, as that would violate all of the laws of chemistry and physics.
Obviously, TEPCO and all of the nuclear experts are lying about #3 building explosion being only hydrogen.
AS OF 2015, OFFICIALS ADMIT MOX FUEL 'LEAKED' INTO THE ENVIRONMENT FROM FUKUSHIMA, SO SORRY ABOUT THAT, AND SO SORRY WE DID NOT TELL YOU BEFORE THIS
Dec. 2015; Officials now say Fukushima reactor with MOX fuel “leaked directly from containment” — TV: Contamination of environment was due to “failure of vessel” — Experts: This has caused additional worries because MOX is more “radioactively aggressive” due to plutonium content (VIDEO)
What is a leak anyway? Could a 'leak' also consist of multiple explosions that ejected the contents of multiple spent fuel pools? Would that interpretation hold water in court?
BLACK AND PURPLE SMOKE FALLOUT CLOUD INDICATES MOX/URANIUM EXPLOSION, CRITICALITY, EJECTION OF MOLTEN FUEL AND FUEL RODS
Nuclear Professor: Blast at Fukushima Reactor 3 was like “exploding vortex ring” — Ejection of nuclear fuel implies there was a “criticality excursion” and steam explosion — Black smoke may have been burning MOX and uranium (PHOTOS)
New Book: Nuclear explosion may have occurred at Fukushima Unit 3 after ‘supercritical condition’ — Sudden increase in plutonium, uranium recorded by U.S. at several EPA stations September 27, 2013
Nuclear Chemistry Expert: Steam at Fukushima reactor could be from corium burning through containment into groundwater January 7, 2014
MaidenHeaven September 26, 2014 pg 56 Fragments or particles of nuclear fuel from the spent fuel pools above the reactors were blown “up to one mile from the units” and pieces of highly radioactive material reportedly fell between two units (presumably 3 and 4) and had to be “bulldozed over,”
(click to access) PDF File describing Fukushima nuclear disaster, including lots of pictures
Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/11/25-of-2-50-of-3-100-of-4-spent-fuel.html
Plutonium-238 From Fukushima 3/11 Mega Nuclear Disaster Went Around The World; Found In Lithuania (EU); ‘Misleading’ Experts Said It Would Stay Close By, Or Did Not Happen
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/plutonium-238-from-fukushima-traveled.html

Steam visible in Dec. 2013, years after the initial mega nuclear disaster
Video; https://youtu.be/-7ajuHdeSg8 5 min.
Why is there a video of a fissure with steam/smoke coming out of it right next to building number 3, months after the mega disaster? This is direct evidence of the corium 'burping' up above ground, and ties in with the increases in radioactive Iodine 131 levels in surrounding towns, and all the way down to Tokyo. It also ties in with the multiple pictures of TONS of out of control, highly radioactive, fissioning coriums coming out of multiple buildings.
(click to access) PDF File describing Fukushima nuclear disaster, including lots of pictures
Then of course, there is fodder for the conspiracy minded folks; there is the extremely way out there theory that Israel caused the #3 and possibly #4 buildings to explode, via remote controlled nuclear bombs, and that the meltdowns were caused by a Stuxnet virus also implanted by the Israelis as well, in revenge for Japan openly declaring support of the Palestinians.
https://311truth.wordpress.com/tag/explosion/?RADIOACTIVE CESIUM WAS MEASURED ALL AROUND THE WORLD, DUE TO FUKUSHIMA HEAVY METAL RADIOACTIVE POISON FALLOUT CLOUD
It is not a question of IF a nuclear criticality happened, it is only a question of where it came from and how much fuel was released into a fallout cloud that then went around the world.
Credit/source Troy Livingston
The above chart proves that Radioactive CESIUM was measured going all the way around the world, in many different towns and cities.
2011 Fukushima contamination around the world
http://www.scribd.com/doc/190969339/2011-Report-Carlsbad-Environmental-Monitoring-Research-Center
vid explaining in more detail
The above chart proves that Radioactive CESIUM was measured going all the way around the world, in many different towns and cities.
2011 Fukushima contamination around the world
http://www.scribd.com/doc/190969339/2011-Report-Carlsbad-Environmental-Monitoring-Research-Center
vid explaining in more detail
The above chart proves that Radioactive IODINE was measured going all the way around the world, in many different towns and cities.
2011 Fukushima contamination around the world
http://www.scribd.com/doc/190969339/2011-Report-Carlsbad-Environmental-Monitoring-Research-Center
vid explaining in more detail
2011 Fukushima contamination around the world
http://www.scribd.com/doc/190969339/2011-Report-Carlsbad-Environmental-Monitoring-Research-Center
vid explaining in more detail
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/11/25-of-2-50-of-3-100-of-4-spent-fuel.html
Plutonium-238 From Fukushima 3/11 Mega Nuclear Disaster Went Around The World; Found In Lithuania (EU); ‘Misleading’ Experts Said It Would Stay Close By, Or Did Not Happen
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/plutonium-238-from-fukushima-traveled.html
NEWS REPORTS; THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE EXPLOSIONS AT BUILDING #3 ON TWO DIFFERENT DAYS
The debris tracks on the #3 building turbine bld roof clearly show two explosions. The first explosion was on 3/14 at 11:01, and there was a second explosion at R3 on 3/15 at 11:00.
News reports also prove that there were two separate explosions on two separate days.
On 15 March, an explosion was heard in Unit 2 and damaged the pressure-suppression system, causing the leaks of radioactive cooling water. Shortly afterward, Unit 4 was damaged by an explosion and a large amount of radioactive materials was released into the atmosphere. At 11:00 (Japan Standard Time) JST on 15 March, Unit 3 exploded [sic] again. At that time, due to the easterly winds and precipitation in and around Fukushima, the surrounding areas including Tokyo, Nagano, Sendai and other places detected high radiation, which matched well with the simulation results.
http://enenews.com/un-agency-reactor-3-exploded-a-second-time-24-hours-later-then-wind-and-rain-brought-high-levels-of-radiation-over-tokyo-sendai-nagano
http://file.scirp.org/Html/2-1090132_33246.htm
Silverlok December 18, 2015 I wonder when they will get around to admitting that both the pressure vessel and containment caps blew clean off and ended up in the turbine room ( which is why it has those holes in the roof:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Mt51nmtuKUY/TiTZMv2BRhI/AAAAAAAAB30/SYe3Vjm_t_0/s1600/fukushimareactor3turbine.JPG , that are exact matches to the sizes of the containment cap, and the pressure vessel cap ( turned on it's side) ) ?
Picture shows multiple empty pools and massive amount of damage to cleared off floor in Building 3
http://enformable.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Fukushima-Daiichi-Unit-3-Damage-From-Above.jpg
Based on the above picture and nothing else, one could easily see how and where 2 different explosions could have originated. A steel reinforced floor with massive amounts of concrete does not just pulverize and disappear like magic. Those holes indicate massive explosive forces were at work, possibly even below the dried out pools where melted out fuel could have possibly hit water.
After Chernobyl blew up the first time, the scientists were VERY afraid of another explosion resulting from corium hitting either groundwater or a water filled basement room. TEPCO did nothing to prevent such explosions, so why wouldn't that be a valid explanation that matches with the evidence in the picture above?
Picture shows multiple empty pools and massive amount of damage to cleared off floor in Building 3
http://enformable.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Fukushima-Daiichi-Unit-3-Damage-From-Above.jpg
Based on the above picture and nothing else, one could easily see how and where 2 different explosions could have originated. A steel reinforced floor with massive amounts of concrete does not just pulverize and disappear like magic. Those holes indicate massive explosive forces were at work, possibly even below the dried out pools where melted out fuel could have possibly hit water.
After Chernobyl blew up the first time, the scientists were VERY afraid of another explosion resulting from corium hitting either groundwater or a water filled basement room. TEPCO did nothing to prevent such explosions, so why wouldn't that be a valid explanation that matches with the evidence in the picture above?
Of course, if TEPCO can lie about building 3 only having a hydrogen explosion, what difference would it make to cover up the loss of a reactor core to the air? It would be easy to cover up... Just one more detail to photoshop in, just like the photoshop job at building 4.. How much lying would a criminal organization resort to, in order to cover up the genocide that will result from a MOX fuel explosion or even two from building 3 spent fuel pools and/or reactor core?
Another nuclear expert shows how there are TWO blast patterns coming out of building #3
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/02/google-earth-reveals-nuclear-explosion.html
Another nuclear expert shows how there are TWO blast patterns coming out of building #3
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2016/02/google-earth-reveals-nuclear-explosion.html
NEUTRON CAPTURE INCREASES WITH HIGHER PLUTONIUM TEMPERATURE; PLUTONIUM BECOMES MORE VOLATILE AS IT HEATS
Fukushima Plutonium Effect and Blow-Up Regimes in Neutron-Multiplying Mediahttp://file.scirp.org/Html/2-1090132_33246.htm
PlowboyGrownUp September 29, 2014 This posted by WYND explains a lot about the Unit 3 explosions. Long video, but worth it.
Unit3 a Pu239 Plasma Criticality Event
See Arto Lauri's
68. Fissio
describes the Plutonium Plasma Criticality Event
69. SL-1 SL-2
72. Spallaatio FUEL *New*
this just added, explains the process of deterioration inside the zirconium cladding,
and the result
OVERHEAD PHOTO SHOWS EVIDENCE OF TWO EXPLOSIONS AT BUILDING #3
Via Starbird December 28, 2013 at 4:46 pm If you look closely at the overhead photo of Reactor #3, in the following link;
In the – 4th photo down – you can see the locations of the TWO explosions.
1. The spent fuel pool was explosion #1 on 3/14/2011
2. The equipment pool was explosion #2 on 3/15/2011
This is easily determined by the roof structure. The roof framework is intact over the reactor, but blown away over the sfp and, most severely, over the equipment pool. Further proof is shown in the debris paths on the turbine bld. Notice the two paths are PARALLEL, meaning they were created from two separate explosions.
This should be enough for anyone with common sense to agree that TEPCO lied again about this as well. There were two explosions on two separate days at building #3, coming from the spent fuel pool and from the equipment pool, both of which contained MOX plutonium fuel. In other words, #3 was NOT merely a hydrogen explosion.
VanneV September 26, 2014 Japan Expert: Second explosion was “more like a bomb” at Fukushima — Spent nuclear fuel flew 30 kilometers away, pellets collected by military — Very strange materials like europium were found — Should have evacuated out to 300 kilometers (VIDEO)
http://enenews.com/japan-expert-second-explosion-more-like-a-bomb-at-fukushima-nuclear-fuel-flew-30-kilometers-away-pellets-collected-by-japan-military-should-have-evacuated-300-kilometer-zone-150-years-t
Spent Fuel Pool Gate #3 was damaged
http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/?p=14637
Unit 3 fuel pool gates shifted
Spent Fuel Pool Gate #3 was damaged
http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/?p=14637
Unit 3 fuel pool gates shifted
Assuming there was an explosion inside the reactor of #3, (potentially a hydrogen explosion) it did not go out vertically through the cover, but instead took the path of least resistance, out through the spent fuel pool gate; the evidence is there of massive amounts of energy and force dislodging the gate. Once the force of that blast hit the spent fuel pool, it could easily trigger another explosion from the pool itself and all of the fuel that was in there.
The shape of that explosion from the spent fuel pool would have been VERTICAL, straight up, because the walls and bottom of the spent fuel pool would have acted much like the barrel of a gun, forcing all of the explosive power straight up.
The shape of that explosion from the spent fuel pool would have been VERTICAL, straight up, because the walls and bottom of the spent fuel pool would have acted much like the barrel of a gun, forcing all of the explosive power straight up.
The metal bolts on the reactor cover were able to 'stretch', and allow explosive gases out of the reactor. This explosion could have deformed the equipment pool, dislodged the SFP gate, bent it, and also gone up and around the edges of the concrete shield, which is shown to have gaps of several inches around the outside edge. Whatever was in the equipment pool exploded as a secondary explosion vertically, after the hydrogen gas explosion coming out of the reactor.
Sickputer May 11, 2016 This link has some of the neatest aerial photos taken in the first month:
http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/breaking-latest-satellite-imagery-fukushima/55711
Look at the second to last photo (hole in the turbine building). That photo really is amazing of a hole in the roof that looks like a fairly intact big steel object went right through several feet of concrete on the roof. Amazing!"
Sickputer May 11, 2016 This link has some of the neatest aerial photos taken in the first month:
http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/breaking-latest-satellite-imagery-fukushima/55711
Look at the second to last photo (hole in the turbine building). That photo really is amazing of a hole in the roof that looks like a fairly intact big steel object went right through several feet of concrete on the roof. Amazing!"
What was this heavy object, that crashed down through a concrete roof, making a huge hole? TEPCO is saying nothing, so this secret may take another 20 to 100 years to come out.
"If it wasn't the lid of the pressure vessel and containment structure, that only leaves the SFP as a contender for 'shotgun barrel' effect. If it was a simple H-air explosion in the SFP that was almost empty of water, I suppose it's possible the H-air explosion could have been sufficiently 'below' enough fuel rod structures to blast them upwards like shot in a barrel, taking out the roof girders. But there's still the detail of the audible 'three bangs'. They are very distinct. I can't see how the effect could be one explosion and two echos. Echos from what? Maybe atmosphere temperature inversion layers, but then the equal spacing and apparently identical amplitudes is a problem. Here's my guess at events: The water in the SFP of #3 boiled off enough to expose some of the tops of the rods. The exposed rod sections overheated and the zirconium burnt in steam, releasing H gas. The building filled with H gas. Something, perhaps the overheating fuel rods, ignited the H-air mix, resulting in an initial H explosion. This shock caused a rapid redistribution of the loose fuel pellets among the decomposing fuel rods. A prompt criticality occured, resulting in a massive sudden heat output, vaporizing rods and fuel in the area of criticality, and flash boiling water just below the area of criticality. This would blast steam and fuel materials upwards, with sufficient force to cut through the roof girders. The time delay between H-air explosion, and criticality could have been very small, on the order of milliseconds, so wouldn't be noticed in the video of the event. So the 'orange explosion' fireball seen could be from the criticality. The orange-hot dust and gasses are bursting sideways due to deflection caused by roof slab material still not far above its original rest location, after the H-air explosion gave it a relatively weak initial kick. But that was just the _first_ criticality, because... As a result of the (first) criticality, water from further down in the fuel rod pool has flash boiled. It blows upwards as steam, as the rods in that area are being crushed downwards by shock waves from the criticality explosion further up the assembly. Suddenly this area of the rods is 'denser', and also the shielding/moderating water is leaving as steam. So... a second prompt criticality occurs. The second 'bang' heard. The result is much the same as with the first. More material is vaporized and blasted upwards, joining the upwards debris jet. More water flash boils, and departs upwards as steam. More of the rods structure is crushed downwards, compressing, and also now without shielding/moderating water. The third prompt criticality occurs.... The third 'bang' heard. Same effect. Except by now there's not enough rod structure left below the explosion point to support a fourth cycle, so the process stops. Or... did it just stop because the water lower down was cooler, or the crush effect wasn't quite right? Apart from the initial visible orange fireball, there are no visual indicators of the 'three blasts' because the second two result only in a continuation of the same effect - an upward jet of dark grey-brown fuel/ concrete dust/ steam mix, with its base obscured by general dust from the overall event."
WHAT WOULD EXPLAIN THE THREE DISTINCT EXPLOSIONS, IN QUICK SUCCESSION?
"If it wasn't the lid of the pressure vessel and containment structure, that only leaves the SFP as a contender for 'shotgun barrel' effect. If it was a simple H-air explosion in the SFP that was almost empty of water, I suppose it's possible the H-air explosion could have been sufficiently 'below' enough fuel rod structures to blast them upwards like shot in a barrel, taking out the roof girders. But there's still the detail of the audible 'three bangs'. They are very distinct. I can't see how the effect could be one explosion and two echos. Echos from what? Maybe atmosphere temperature inversion layers, but then the equal spacing and apparently identical amplitudes is a problem. Here's my guess at events: The water in the SFP of #3 boiled off enough to expose some of the tops of the rods. The exposed rod sections overheated and the zirconium burnt in steam, releasing H gas. The building filled with H gas. Something, perhaps the overheating fuel rods, ignited the H-air mix, resulting in an initial H explosion. This shock caused a rapid redistribution of the loose fuel pellets among the decomposing fuel rods. A prompt criticality occured, resulting in a massive sudden heat output, vaporizing rods and fuel in the area of criticality, and flash boiling water just below the area of criticality. This would blast steam and fuel materials upwards, with sufficient force to cut through the roof girders. The time delay between H-air explosion, and criticality could have been very small, on the order of milliseconds, so wouldn't be noticed in the video of the event. So the 'orange explosion' fireball seen could be from the criticality. The orange-hot dust and gasses are bursting sideways due to deflection caused by roof slab material still not far above its original rest location, after the H-air explosion gave it a relatively weak initial kick. But that was just the _first_ criticality, because... As a result of the (first) criticality, water from further down in the fuel rod pool has flash boiled. It blows upwards as steam, as the rods in that area are being crushed downwards by shock waves from the criticality explosion further up the assembly. Suddenly this area of the rods is 'denser', and also the shielding/moderating water is leaving as steam. So... a second prompt criticality occurs. The second 'bang' heard. The result is much the same as with the first. More material is vaporized and blasted upwards, joining the upwards debris jet. More water flash boils, and departs upwards as steam. More of the rods structure is crushed downwards, compressing, and also now without shielding/moderating water. The third prompt criticality occurs.... The third 'bang' heard. Same effect. Except by now there's not enough rod structure left below the explosion point to support a fourth cycle, so the process stops. Or... did it just stop because the water lower down was cooler, or the crush effect wasn't quite right? Apart from the initial visible orange fireball, there are no visual indicators of the 'three blasts' because the second two result only in a continuation of the same effect - an upward jet of dark grey-brown fuel/ concrete dust/ steam mix, with its base obscured by general dust from the overall event."
http://everist.org/Fukushima/20110428_out_AG_FukushimaUnit3explosion.txt
FUEL RODS BLOWN OUT OF BUILDING #3
TEPCO claimed nothing more than a hydrogen explosion happened at building #3. This is just another lie. TEPCO, what are all of these fuel rods doing outside the building, if the building just had a 'hydrogen' explosion?
You can clearly see the fuel rods blown out of the #3 building with these pictures.
Post by Troy Livingston.
Click on link to see picture in case it is erased or censored
Now there is still some debate about whether one of the explosions came from the spent fuel pool or the reactor itself.
According to JoeNeubarth December 28, 2013 at 12:10 pm, he claims that at least one of those explosions "was a vectored steam explosion from the Torus when several tons of Corium fell into the Torus propelled by a hydrogen explosion milliseconds before. Anybody can see that the explosion was vectored upward just by watching the Reactor Three Explosion Video.
According to JoeNeubarth December 28, 2013 at 12:10 pm, he claims that at least one of those explosions "was a vectored steam explosion from the Torus when several tons of Corium fell into the Torus propelled by a hydrogen explosion milliseconds before. Anybody can see that the explosion was vectored upward just by watching the Reactor Three Explosion Video.
I have argued about this with the Arnie supporters. The simple fact of the matter is that if there was a prompt critical explosion in the fuel pool, it would have blown the side of the pool out. That obviously did not happen, but the roof of the Reactor building was blown sky high by all of the lower floors shooting up and through the reactor building. Why was it vectored upward? That is simple, too, because deep in the bowels of the building the only way to go was up. A lot of en-trained Corium when skyward in that explosion."
Either way, a lot of MOX fuel came out of the building, at least some of it in melted form. This plutonium then went around the world.
HOW DID THESE EXPLOSIONS HAPPEN?
So how did these explosions happen?
According to hbjon December 28, 2013 at 12:17 pm, "Uranium dioxide, when cast into a pellet under high pressure heats up by itself when removed from the die. Understandably, a smaller press must be used for MOX fuel. Those atoms are as close together as their going to get until they're melted and solidified under atmospheric pressure.
According to hbjon December 28, 2013 at 12:17 pm, "Uranium dioxide, when cast into a pellet under high pressure heats up by itself when removed from the die. Understandably, a smaller press must be used for MOX fuel. Those atoms are as close together as their going to get until they're melted and solidified under atmospheric pressure.
The fuel had liquefied and produced massive amounts of tritium when contact with heavy water was made. You with me so far? Tritium and oxygen gas take up more space than heavy water and when you try to confine it in a limited space, the pressure will increase. So what do we have? We have a fissioning blob of fresh corium in a confinement that has increasing gas pressure(pressure cooker). When tritium (or hydrogen atoms with increased neutron content) are pushed together by pressure, they fuse. When that happens it takes less of the glue that holds nucleons together to bind the new nucleus and there is a release of energy. The energy is sometimes referred to as nuclear energy but in fact it's only fusion. The momentary orange flash told us this in unit 3.
There are factors that come into play that will determine the approximate yield of such an explosion. Venting, pressure, temperature, and other variables. A critical mass will explode, but under these contaminated, neutron rich conditions unlikely."
Arnie Gunderson also postulated a prompt criticality happened in #3, which made the MOX plutonium fueled explosion in this building look much different and go up much higher than in any of the other buildings.
lam335 May 11, 2016 Gundersen called it a "detonation" and a "prompt moderated criticality" [@ 32:00-34:40]
http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/audio/IYLTP%20-%20Ep%20199.mp3PICTURE OF GOLDEN COLORED CORIUM MASS COMING OUT OF BUILDING, TURNING BLACK AS IT FLOWS DOWNWARDS AND COOLS
TEPCO also claims that everything stayed inside of the containment. Then why was there a picture of corium mass exiting both the #4 building below and the #3 building in another article; link below.
What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2016/04/what-really-happened-at-3-fukushima.html
What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2016/04/what-really-happened-at-3-fukushima.html
(gold colored mass dripping out of building #4; notice it turns black, red and brown as it flows further down and cools off)
CORIUM ALSO TURNED BLACK AS IT COOLED, AS IT WAS COMING OUT OF BUILDING #4, AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED AT CHERNOBYL TO THE CORIUM IN THE BASEMENT THERE
and also corium coming out of building #4
(black liquid mass coming out of right side of building #4) Compare that black mass oozing out of the building to this corium at Chernobyl
CORIUM FISSION PROCESS RESULTS IN RADIOACTIVE IODINE 131 SPIKES DOWNWIND
Why are there reports of increasing radioactive Iodine 131 levels in surrounding towns in 2014? The short half life of this element means it should be completely gone by now, if everything is cooled off and under control.
The only way this can happen is if there is an underground corium underneath Fukushima, and it is 'burping' fission products up.. Where is the evidence of this burping, besides the pictures of liquid corium masses coming out of at least two buildings, and then going into the ground?
WHY IS FUKUSHIMA SITE STILL STEAMING YEARS LATER?
Steam visible in Dec. 2013, years after the initial mega nuclear disaster
Video; https://youtu.be/-7ajuHdeSg8 5 min.
Why is there a video of a fissure with steam/smoke coming out of it right next to building number 3, months after the mega disaster? This is direct evidence of the corium 'burping' up above ground, and ties in with the increases in radioactive Iodine 131 levels in surrounding towns, and all the way down to Tokyo. It also ties in with the multiple pictures of TONS of out of control, highly radioactive, fissioning coriums coming out of multiple buildings.
Why is building #3 still steaming right up to 2014?
Thanks to Nukelchen; here is more evidence of 'burping'
Fukushima corium
Radioactive Smoke/Steam Coming Out Of Ground And #3 Reactor Building At Fukushima, Rainbow Ion Spouts, 2011 - 2015
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/tokyo-alert-severe-radioactive-smoke.html
Radioactive Smoke/Steam Coming Out Of Ground And #3 Reactor Building At Fukushima, Rainbow Ion Spouts, 2011 - 2015
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/tokyo-alert-severe-radioactive-smoke.html
PARTIAL LIST OF WHAT CAME OUT OF THE EXPLOSIONS AT BUILDING 3, THANKS TO AIPRI, INCLUDES VARIOUS FORMS OF RADIOACTIVE PLUTONIUM - MOX FUEL
As anyone can see above, various varieties of PU, or plutonium are included in the radioactive heavy metal poisons that got ejected up and out into the upper atmosphere, where it then went all around the world. Everyone got some of this free Fukushima radiation, and the negative consequences showed up almost immediately, but will really hit starting about five years later, in 2016, when the latency period runs out and the cancer and other disease rates will really start increasing.
SUMMARY
Bottom line, things are getting WORSE at the Fukushima site, not better, as time goes on. Radiation levels are increasing both in the ocean, in the groundwater and on land. This does not look or sound like a normal 'decommissioning'.
What Really Happened At Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? via @Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-really-happened-at-fukushima.html
What Really Happened At Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? via @Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-really-happened-at-fukushima.html
Bottom line, TEPCO lied about what happened at the #3 and other Fukushima reactor buildings plus spent fuel pools. TEPCO lied not only about what happened there, not just in one way, but in MANY ways. So if they can lie with a straight face about basic facts like this, what else are they hiding and keeping secret at Fukushima?
Now, who are you going to believe and TRUST? TEPCO, the Japanese government, the NRC, the IAEA, pro nuclear scientists, the US military, the mass media, or your own eyes?
DONATE, SHARE, CONNECT, FOLLOW, COLLABORATE
Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Support AGRP and share this page; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, Wordpress and on Buffer
"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode. Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.
End
Not 1 Hydrogen Explosion, But 2 Separate PLUTONIUM MOX Fuel Explosions At Fukushima Building #3; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/01/another-lie-by-tepco-not-1-hydrogen.html
Website and contact page
Index, Table Of Contents
A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)
Share; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, Wordpress and on Buffer
Website and contact page
Index, Table Of Contents
A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)
Share; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, Wordpress and on Buffer
View comments