CuttingCard

How to add an entry to a digital garden without ever facing a blank, well-formatted page, and why it's fine to let a language model do the sorting.

FIELD GUIDE · SPECIMEN NO. 04 · DIGITAL GARDENS
RAWsrc/inbox/2026-08-07-0641.md

"the espresso machine's descaling smell is exactly the greenhouse at the botanical garden in january. why."

no frontmatter · no formatting · just committed
FILEDsrc/notes/greenhouse-descaling.md
--- type: observation symbol: date: 2026-08-07 links: [[scent-and-memory]] ---

The espresso machine's descaling cycle smells exactly like the botanical garden's greenhouse in January. Worth tracing why. See [[scent-and-memory]].

classified · symbolled · linked · cleared from inbox

the model sorted this one. the sentence is still entirely yours.

Step one: the cutting

Lower the bar until it's on the floor

Most digital gardens fail at the inbox, not the notes folder. When an entry requires a title, a type, a symbol, and a set of links before it's allowed to exist, most thoughts simply stop getting written down.

So the inbox asks for nothing. Open src/inbox/, dump the thought exactly as it arrived, no frontmatter, no heading, no tidy sentence, and commit. That's the entire daily minimum. A cutting doesn't need formatting yet. It just needs to be saved before you forget it.

src/inbox/ ├── 2026-08-05-1822.md ├── 2026-08-06-0930.md └── 2026-08-07-0641.md ← today's cutting, unformatted
The method

What the repo actually says

This is lifted straight from the garden's own instructions file, the version every contributor reads before touching the inbox.

CLAUDE.md — excerpt
## How to add an entry

The idea of the daily minimum contribution is to open `src/inbox/`, dump a thought with no frontmatter or formatting and commit.

To publish properly: classify the fragment's `type`, assign a `symbol` from the taxonomy, write proper frontmatter, add `[[wikilinks]]` to anything that already exists as a note, and move it to `src/notes/<slug>.md`, then clear it out of the inbox. See `CLAUDE.md` for the fuller sorting info.
The taxonomy

Six symbols, chosen by you

Publishing means picking a type and stamping it with a symbol. The set below is a starting system, small enough to hold in your head, specific enough to mean something when you scan a hundred notes at once.

sparka new idea, not yet connected to anything else in the garden.
?
questionan open loop, deliberately left unresolved and revisited later.
quoteborrowed language, always attributed, kept apart from your own words.
observationsomething noticed in the world, dated, not yet argued for.
bridgea note that exists mainly to connect two other notes that hadn't met yet.
synthesisa fully rooted thought, ready to stand on its own outside the garden.
Step two: the card

Why let the model do the sorting

Everything between "dump a thought" and "clear the inbox" is organizing work: reading the fragment, comparing it to everything already in src/notes/, choosing a type, picking a symbol, drafting frontmatter, finding the [[wikilinks]] that already exist. None of it is writing. All of it is sorting.

That's exactly the work a model that's read your whole archive is good at, and exactly the work most people quietly stop doing once the inbox gets past thirty entries. Handing it off isn't a compromise on the practice, it's what keeps the practice alive past week three.

The cutting stays yours. The card is just where it gets stored.

The line that matters: a model never writes what goes in src/inbox/. It only helps move an already-written thought into src/notes/, the classifying, the stamping, the linking. Your sentence, dumped at 6:41am with no punctuation to spare, arrives on the card exactly as you wrote it.

Doesn't this outsource your thinking to a model?
No thought in this garden was ever written by the model, only sorted by it. The cutting is finished before it ever sees the inbox.
Won't every garden start to look the same?
The taxonomy is yours, not the model's. It matches fragments to categories you defined; it doesn't invent new ones on its own.
What if it gets a wikilink wrong?
Every classification, symbol, and link is a suggestion sitting in a diff. Nothing moves out of the inbox until you accept it.
Fuller rules

Everything above is the field version

The complete sorting logic, every edge case in the taxonomy, slug conventions, what happens when a fragment fits two types at once, lives in CLAUDE.md at the root of the repo. Read this page for the shape of the method. Read that file before you touch anything with real edge cases.