(cache)solst/ICE of Astarte on X: "Interesting article on treating agent output like compiler output (and why) https://t.co/UHV1V1PzN1 https://t.co/Yzf33UCu5x" / X

Post

solst/ICE of Astarte
@IceSolst
Interesting article on treating agent output like compiler output (and why) skiplabs.io/blog/codegen_a…
Zack Korman
@ZackKorman
May 1
Mandatory human-in-the-loop is a cybersecurity cop-out. People are giving agents more and more autonomy. We need solutions that accept that world because there is no stopping it. It's like telling people in the 90s to not use the internet to avoid getting hacked. Good luck.
4:56 PM · May 1, 20261.4MViews
solst/ICE of Astarte
@IceSolst
May 1
“But compilers are deterministic” The undefined blob of whatever constitutes sufficient review doesn’t necessarily need to be nondeterministic (it prob won’t be) Your guardrails shouldn’t be nondeterministic
solst/ICE of Astarte
@IceSolst
May 3
There’s more points in this thread for the negligible minority that reads beyond the headline of a screenshot
solst/ICE of Astarte
@IceSolst
May 3
Inevitably we’ll have tooling to enhance code review (not replace it) If you’re responsible for hundreds of devs or large OSS projects, its already hard to trust manual review (eg disgruntled reviewer on their last day blindly lgtm’ing with ramifications appearing months later).
Alexis
@bitsadventures
May 2
Compilers don't hallucinate and don't recommend me to use a function that doesn't exist.
Join the conversation
Read 279 more replies