So I came to the IRC only to be leaked at by Aout, which opened the topic about him posting a sexual depiction of Smuglet.
He agreed it was a loli once again but then him, @soycheckmark and @isaac33 tried to say
>SAAR YOU LEFT IT UP AND IT'S INHERENTLY FAGPHILIC
Soylita is explicitly modeled after the concept of a "Lolita." The term "Lolita" comes from Lolita, whose central subject is an adult man's sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl. The term "Lolita" has become widely associated with the sexualization of underage girls.
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls
Moreover he didn't contact me about any of this and just went out and posted Smuglet porn btw.
Come die on this topic.
He agreed it was a loli once again but then him, @soycheckmark and @isaac33 tried to say
>SAAR YOU LEFT IT UP AND IT'S INHERENTLY FAGPHILIC
Soylita is explicitly modeled after the concept of a "Lolita." The term "Lolita" comes from Lolita, whose central subject is an adult man's sexual obsession with a 12-year-old girl. The term "Lolita" has become widely associated with the sexualization of underage girls.
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls
Moreover he didn't contact me about any of this and just went out and posted Smuglet porn btw.
Come die on this topic.
3 weeks ago#1347177
smuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
3 weeks ago#1347180
3 weeks ago#1347184
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girlssmuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
isaac33
isaac33
3 weeks ago#1347185
@Warrior-Z smuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
BootsandChainsaws
Molester in training
3 weeks ago#1347187
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girls@Warrior-Z smuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
3 weeks ago#1347191
smuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
3 weeks ago#1347193
Without the knowledge of Blue Archive, Smuglet appears to be a reaction image from @MACARONI's former pfp. Even if someone claims it originated from Blue Archive, that alone doesn't make the image itself Diddyphilic. An image isn't inherently sexual simply because it depicts a youthful-looking anime character, for example posting Kid Goku isn't Diddyphilic. The properties of a franchise don't automatically transfer to every individual image or meme from it UNLIKE Soylita which inherently represents the conception within the story which is sexualization of underage girlssmuglet was traced from a fagphilic game that makes it inherently fagphilic just like soylita why wasnt it banned
Joseph_L_Garcia
"And then I go and spoil the thread by saying something stupid like I'm trans too~"🎶
3 weeks ago#1347197
Unban aout so he can debate you nigger
Joseph_L_Garcia
"And then I go and spoil the thread by saying something stupid like I'm trans too~"🎶
Log in to reply to this thread.
