>>951162408Yeah, things purely for scientific research!
Id also like to know this. I find the case studies and statistics interesting, but I suspect high bias as well. For instance, they claim to advertise for "participants with positive experience with incest", then claim that 85% of responders voiced a negative experience, 12% a neutral experience, and 3% a positive experience.
Its hard to know for sure, but when you get these kinds of voluntary reporting studies, there much be some element of bias in the types of ppl that would take time to show up and report this stuff. Like a negative reporting bias, where people are more likely to want to talk about bad experiences than good ones. Or how a sizable portion of the. sample are from people seeking psychiatric help.
Obviously, things can be bad, and id even suspect its a majority. People are assholes and idiots mostly. But I just cant help but think 3% is low. And what was the common denominator in the success and failing cases. As I posted above, perceived agency seems to be vastly important. As is violence, conversely
