Retweeting because not only @saylor should read this:
"We don't need a URSF because BIP110's mandatory signaling already acts as its own activation mechanism" ... or lack thereof.
Kratter is a troll. Don't feed the troll.
Hey @saylor, the idea that a URSF is somehow required is a rhetorical invention by BIP110 proponents. It shifts the burden from demonstrating broad support to claiming victory by default unless opponents actively fork away. That's not how Bitcoin consensus works.
We don't need a
