NO VAC WORK IN 2026 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE PREMIER AND COMPETITIVE IS FULL OF CHEATERS !!!!!!!!! IS VALVE SO POOR ? CANNOT MAKE A GOOD ANTICHEAT???????? 9/10 GAMES ONLY CHEATER !!!!!!!!!!!!
< 1 2 >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
This forum highly disagrees with you, bub:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/

And not everyone who hands you a botty spanking is a cheater. Most are simply better at the game than you are.
Two things:

1. Your caps lock is broken, please fix it.

2. Those players aren't cheating, they're just better than you. No, you're not as good as you think. Reality check.
As of today 13/07/2026 there are:

53,242,095 - VAC Banned accounts.
So you need the demo ?:)))) , just search on tiktok live, how many kids strealing with cheat on valve servers :) is so easy to understand who is better and who is cheating ! dont be dumb
hahahha =))))))))))))) with who im speaking =)) Nx Machina : trust factor 10%
BJWyler : trust factor 60% , and
Hi Im Lone Wolf who is playing a non valve game , srsly? :)))
Originally posted by zErǑ' 𝕄𝕍ℙ💀:
hahahha =))))))))))))) with who im speaking =)) Nx Machina : trust factor 10%

I have zero hours in CS2 or any version of CS.

So we go back to your claim that VAC does not work.

13/07/2026 there are 53,242,095 - VAC Banned accounts.

Then there is the VAC forum full of accounts who claim they did not cheat yet are banned. VAC is working as intended as 33 of your friends who have a VAC ban can testify.
Dude, post your complaints about a game in that game's forum.
I'd guess these days the cheaters are far more advanced than the old VAC system, yes it gets updated but the cracks are way more advanced.. hell they can now hack with hardware that's undetectable..

I avoid all online games these days its not fun anymore.
Originally posted by zErǑ' 𝕄𝕍ℙ💀:
THE PREMIER AND COMPETITIVE IS FULL OF CHEATERS !!!!!!!!! IS VALVE SO POOR ? CANNOT MAKE A GOOD ANTICHEAT???????? 9/10 GAMES ONLY CHEATER !!!!!!!!!!!!


Originally posted by Hi Im Lone Wolf:
Two things:

1. Your caps lock is broken, please fix it.

2. Those players aren't cheating, they're just better than you. No, you're not as good as you think. Reality check.


Evidence
Player accusing cheats "9/10 games are cheaters." None. Hyperbole and emotional certainty.

Evidence
Replying user "They're just better than you." None. Dismissal and assumption about the player's skill.

Both are replacing evidence with certainty.

The first over-attributes losses to external causes ("everyone cheats").
The second over-attributes them to internal causes ("you're simply bad").

Neither asks the obvious questions:

Were there suspicious demos?
What rank is this?
Were any players later VAC banned?
Is the player actually misreading legitimate mechanics?

Instead, both jump straight to a complete explanation.

It's almost symmetrical:

"I lose because everyone cheats."

vs.

"You lose because you suck."

They're mirror images. One protects the ego by blaming the environment; the other protects confidence in the game's integrity by blaming the player. Both are identity-preserving narratives more than evidence-based arguments.

What i'm noticing is less about Counter-Strike and more about how internet arguments tend to polarize. Once someone takes one extreme position, the response often swings to the opposite extreme, and both sides end up arguing from assumptions instead of investigating the specific case.
Originally posted by PS2:
Player accusing cheats "9/10 games are cheaters." None. Hyperbole and emotional certainty.
Not true at all. No evidence at all. Its usually pattern recognition, certain hacks perform certain ways and people notice them.
Originally posted by PocketYoda:
Originally posted by PS2:
Player accusing cheats "9/10 games are cheaters." None. Hyperbole and emotional certainty.
Not true at all. No evidence at all. Its usually pattern recognition, certain hacks perform certain ways and people notice them.
I never said anything you argued against.
Originally posted by PS2:
Originally posted by PocketYoda:
Not true at all. No evidence at all. Its usually pattern recognition, certain hacks perform certain ways and people notice them.
I never said anything you argued against.
My bad i misread your quote. I agree.
Originally posted by zErǑ' 𝕄𝕍ℙ💀:
hahahha =))))))))))))) with who im speaking =)) Nx Machina : trust factor 10%
BJWyler : trust factor 60% , and
Hi Im Lone Wolf who is playing a non valve game , srsly? :)))

stop making up fake stats, you can't view trust factor lmao.
< 1 2 >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
Per page: 1530 50