Awful Responses: Fungus_Factory (Squib)
Do not harass anyone involved.
Document made by @yuziakori feel free to DM on Discord for any inquiries, questions or comments (Do be patient as I might not be the fastest to handle DMs)
This document serves as a counter towards Squib’s response towards the recent situation regarding Hindsight’s latest update that added fetish content (pooltoy oc)
Screenshots with a white text background are from squib’s response, it will be fully countered in this document.
The Fetish Content
Before we begin with Squib’s response, I’d like to mention the fetish content that was added to Hindsight in the case there’s doubts surrounding it.
On 02/06/2026 (Two days ago as of the writing & publication date of this document) Hindsight would make a rather alarming update, this was rather because of a new addition, that being a skin for the gootraxian named ‘’manic’’
(Skin showcase)
The skin was rather alarming due to the content portrayed, a pooltoy furry OC made by an user (Squib) who had very clear signs of having a pooltoy fetish.
Analyzing the skin in depth, it has multiple details that are signatures of the fetish it is portraying.
Game details
-Overly detailed rubber-like texture (Commonly seen in rubber fetishes related to pooltoys)
-Warning label that mentions overinflation (Common fetish related to pooltoys)
-Handlebars (Seen in pooltoy fetishes)
Non-ingame details
-Creator (Squib) has obvious blatant fetishes for pooltoys (Seen in the 3D avatars created by them)
(Squib’s avatar catalog)
-The addition of such content to a furry-related media, as this is where pooltoy fetishes are commonly seen
-The addition of the fetish content to a ROBLOX game with a playerbase & community consisting of mostly minors, such as children & young teenagers.
-The entire context surrounding pooltoys & furries being mixed together, having bases on lots of fetishes such as inflation, rubber, latex, etc.
-Concerns due to the skin being used as icon / overly ‘’promoted’’ for the update, which gives an invitation for people with pooltoy fetishes to enter the community.
(Official art of the skin added to Hindsight) 
(Game icon for the update)
(2nd pooltoy design added after Yuka decided to double down)
More info on the ‘’double down’’ will be provided in the next section.
Squib’s Response
As per usual, Squib’s response will be dissected & argued against.
If by mess you mean poorly written, poorly addressed & an attempt to victimize yourself, sure.
Your intent is very clear as you are aware that what you added has obvious links to fetishes & suggestive content, as you would later admit in the response
Your ‘’I am aroace’’ defense is a logical fallacy, being aroace does not make you magically immune to creating fetish content. Let alone exposing children & young teenagers to it.
The realism & detail on the skin is something fungus has previously used in suggestive/inappropriate ways off-platform, meaning that they’re not a stranger to the fetishes between pooltoys & furry ocs.
Not to mention you ARE aware of the context of pooltoys & the fetish material linked to them. You are also aware of the context of the platform you added the fetish oc to (ROBLOX)
‘’I started making SFW pool toy avatars in the game because most of the other ones had other ones that other people had made were suggestive in natura’’
Squib claims to be aware of the suggestive content (AKA: fetishes) centered around pooltoys.
So any denial to not be aware of their context & the fetish content surrounding them (that would later be a noticeable inspiration in the way squib designs their models) is simply an excuse.
Once again, being aroace and sex repulsed does not mean that you cannot create fetish content.
While I personally have empathy for the grooming experiences you endured, you fail to recognize that does not make you immune to recreating dynamics related to fetishes. You cannot use victimhood to dismiss criticism regarding your actions.
‘’I don’t make suggestive works’’
Proof says otherwise!
A baby/toddler representing pooltoy, with thigh handlebars, weirdly inflated body & a ‘’valve’’ in their stomach.
This is suggestive, and it is in fact part of a pooltoy fetish. This was created by Squib, who as we’ve seen would later drag their fetish to the ROBLOX platform, a platform in which multiple children & young teenagers can be easily exposed to this fetish
This is performative, if you truly cared about not exposing children to a fetish you would entirely remove the skin rather than attempting to conceal the more obvious signs of it being a fetish. You are just trying to conceal your poorly disguised fetish because you got caught doing so. If there had never been backlash you would have never bothered anyways.
As we have seen, Squib does create suggestive models regarding pooltoys, so they should have ZERO BUSINESS dragging their obvious fetish into the ROBLOX platform.
‘’but I do understand that there are a number of people who fetishize them unfortunately, Just please know my intentions were innocent at heart!’’
Everyone is aware you knew there are HEAVY LINKS TO FETISHES when it comes to pooltoy & furry designs, you simply did not care when creating this, do not care enough to remove it entirely, and do not care whatsoever about the fact this is something children & young teenagers are being exposed to thanks to you, all you have done is victimize yourself. And your response is heavy proof of that.
‘’Because I've literally never heard of it being associated with such a thing until someone on twitter talked about it’’
Contradicting, you literally are a first-hand witness of it.
You are not unaware, you weren’t unaware, you also created suggestive models that are heavily linked to the fetishes surrounding pooltoys.
‘’The first thing i will clear up is my terms of use for my vrchat avatars, which was screenshotted out of context to try paint me as some porn addict or something like that.’’
Overreach, the screenshot was used to show that you DO ALLOW fetish usage of your pooltoy avatars, there’s no excuse to say that NSFW usage of your pooltoy avatars is not fetishy. Multiple of your other avatars did not allow for NSFW usage, so pooltoys being an exception is a pretty clear sign of you allowing fetish usage of your creations. You simply facilitate fetishes off-platform that you would later attempt to bring into ROBLOX.
It is fair for users & people with said fetishes to keep them to themselves, in private, as long as they’re not exposing them to children. However you’ve clearly exposed your fetishes to a platform & game with a playerbase that is consisting of children & young teenagers.
To add on, multiple of Squib’s avatar have disclaimers against NSFW edits or simply exclude the NSFW part, something that is seen in the Hindsight models
(Hindsight related avatar)
(That avatar’s TOS, does not state anything regarding NSFW being prohibited, better example of what I refer to below)
(The TOS of another avatar regarding Hindsight, emphasis on the DO NOT part.)
It is very evident that Squib DOES NOT use the same TOS for all of their creations, and if they truly believed they can’t stop vrchat players from using their creations for NSFW content, they would not bother writing a TOS list that goes against NSFW content.
To add, their creations regarding pooltoys (noticeably one that features a pacifier, inflated body, thigh handlebars & obvious inspiration from pooltoy related fetishes) always allow NSFW usage, and are in nature suggestive, which are obvious invitations for them to be used for fetishes.
(Pooltoy fetish avatar, contains a pacifier, an inflated body & thigh handlebars, obvious sign of fetishes.)
(The TOS)
This is incredibly disgusting, as Squib allows an avatar that portrays a baby/toddler to have NSFW edits. Which is an obvious facilitation for fetishes related to pooltoys (inflation & rubber) and ageplay.
(To clarify, this is not an accusation I have been ‘’holding’’ or ‘’gatekeeping’’ until anything happened, I was simply not aware of this as I did the mistake of expecting too much from Squib)
Once again, facilitating such fetishes with YOUR OWN CONTENT while creating already suggestive models that are blatant fetish content, then dragging one of them into ROBLOX is simply reckless behavior. It is exposing minors to fetishes despite being well aware that what you’re exposing has bases on your own fetishes.
‘’Im not an ageplayer, I am very agaisnt NSFW age regression in general because I hate anyone who sexualizes children or child-like things. Its nasty as hell son’’
As shown above in the previous section of Squib’s response, they rather facilitated the usage of this avatar (that depicts a child-like character) to be edited for NSFW & fetishes.
Not to mention, you adding a pacifier (baby item) to a suggestive & blatant fetish avatar (Inflation fetish pooltoy avatar with weird design choices & thigh handlebars) goes quite against your own claims.
‘’It was a joke’’
Oldest defense for inappropriate content. Invalid excuse.
That does not excuse your highly questionable design choices, and you should be aware of that at this point.
Age regression & ageplay are different things. age regression is an entirely normal thing for coping & trauma victims (although, this is only normal in therapy and anyone pushing it to other people on the internet should not be engaged with), whereas ageplay is simply a fetish. In this case, ageplay is pretty much what we have seen.
‘’but i think calling people pedophiles over being age regressors is incredibly cruel and very inaccurate to what it is.’’
This was simply made up, I do not have any clue what the author (Squib) is referring to as nobody has been called a ‘’pedophile’’ over being age regressors.
(Searching for the word pedophile in my own twitter account, 0 results)
According to Squib, this avatar (Screenshot above) is apparently not suggestive nor fetish related.
As mentioned before, they facilitated & allowed the usage of this avatar (that represents a baby/toddler pooltoy dragon species) to be used for NSFW & fetishes.
This is an attempt from Squib to seek excuses.
Well if you had no reason to lie about it, we wouldn’t be here, would we?
Not to mention Squib keeps using the ‘’sexual harassment’’ overreach, it is not sexual harassment to search for public info & call out the blatant fetish that’s being exposed to children & young teenagers, this is an attempt from Squib to play the victim rather than own up to their actions.
This is not sexual harassment, it is critique, sexual harassment requires sexually charged behaviour directed towards Squib. Which is obviously not the case here and it is utterly disgusting for Squib to attempt to victimize themselves with such a serious accusation that has a mental impact on victims.
I will not address this topic as I believe it is best for the reader to see for themselves. Link towards the callout post with all evidence regarding Tatsu will be provided below.
https://x.com/SakiaHasExfired/status/2062280117007921509
(If you do not use toyhouse, check the replies of the post)
I will let you reach your own conclusions on this topic.
‘’Just be civil with me.’’
When we tried to do that about this topic with Yuka she simply doubled down..
(Excuse the low quality, some devices might not see the first image properly.)
Her attitude points to not being willing to cooperate or even have the slightest bit of care towards listening. She has previously enabled behaviors related to fetishes & grooming, so this is unfortunately expected.
(The pooltoy oc created AFTER the user talked with her)
This is not ‘’cooperating’’ or caring about fetish content being added to the game, this is just doubling down out of spite (Funnily enough, that’s what the entirety of the existence of Hindsight lives out of…)
The pooltoy oc that Yuka created afterwards being named ‘’Salty Splash’’ comes off as an attempt to call genuinely concerned people ‘’salty’’.
Although, the previous claim regarding the name might be a coincidence.
And lastly, to finish off Squib’s response, here’s a quote from the end:
‘’People on twitter love to be insanely cruel.’’
These are screenshots of Squib guilt-tripping a grooming victim from a recent case that happened around 2-3 months ago, the interaction happened less than 2 months ago from now, all the victim was requesting is an in-game appeal to an unfair ban they were given so they could finally move on from the grooming situation.
In this interaction, Squib attempts to guilt-trip the victim because ‘’It made them (staff & devs) stressed’’ (By It they refer to the document where the victim’s situation was fully exposed alongside staff’s mishandling & negligence of the entire situation)
Recriminating a 14 year old grooming victim simply because they called out their situation is gross.
Furthermore, If there’s anyone who is ‘’insanely cruel’’ it’s rather obviously Squib, as they never even bothered to apologize to the victim for this, they simply walked away after getting scolded. Not to mention that Squib has done nothing but play victim in this situation rather than face any form of accountability.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this entire response from Squib is what can be considered a theatrical performance of victimhood, a poor response that’s not taken seriously in the slightest by the own writer & an attempt to not take accountability while letting the fetish content remain in the game & doubling down out of spite.
The pooltoy design added to the game is visually identical to fetish content, regardless of intentions (which in this case are not the best as we’ve seen from Squib) placing it in a Roblox kid’s game remains irresponsible, something that Squib alongside Yuka refuse to face. Not to mention they simply attempted to conceal it rather than fully remove it, Keep in mind this design is CURRENTLY THE FACE OF THE GAME
Meaning, that people who DO have fetishes for this sort of content have a nice warm invitation to check the game & interact with its community, which is mostly children & young teenagers
Additionally also exposing that fetish to minors along the way.
Multiple excuses seen in Squib’s response (Example: being aroace makes me unable to create fetish content / the pacifier on the vrchat avatar I made was a joke) are mere attempts from Squib to make their actions seem as ‘’less’’ & simply evade accountability.
No excuse can exempt you from accountability. Your intentions (which have been proven to be rather questionable by itself) do not erase what you did in the first place.
You cannot claim ‘’innocence’’ when your designs, TOS, deflections, excuses & actions speak for themselves. Intent is not a shield. Accountability & backlash for your actions is not harassment. Do better.
-Y.K 04/06/2026 (DD/MM/YY) WRITTEN & FINISHED ON DATE OF PUBLICATION
(END OF COUNTER-RESPONSE)