Cell
Volume 188, Issue 21, 16 October 2025, Pages 5847-5861.e11
Society Logo

Article
Conversion of IscB and Cas9 into RNA-guided RNA editors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.07.032Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Removal or disruption of the TID domain converts IscB to an RNA editor
  • R-IscB has comparable activity to Cas13 but lacks discernible cytotoxicity
  • R-IscB is robust in splicing perturbation, A-to-I editing, and trans-splicing
  • The same approach converts several Cas9s to efficient RNA editors

Summary

RNA-guided RNA editing represents an attractive alternative to DNA editing. However, the prevailing tool, CRISPR-Cas13, has collateral RNA cleavage activity that causes undesirable cytotoxicity in human cells. Here, we report an ultracompact RNA-editing platform engineered from IscB, which has comparable or higher activity than Cas13 but without cytotoxicity concerns. We show that IscB, the evolutionary ancestor of Cas9, has an intrinsic affinity for complementary single-stranded (ss)DNA and RNA. This activity becomes dominant when its double-stranded DNA binding activity is switched off through the deletion of its target-adjacent motif domain. The resulting R-IscB is comparable to or better than Cas13, can efficiently alter splicing outcomes in human cells, and can further mediate trans-splicing to correct any mutation at the mRNA level. R-IscB also drives efficient A-to-I editing on mRNA when fused to adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 2 (ADAR2) and mediates cleavage-based mRNA knockdown upon HNH engineering. Finally, we show that the same approach converts some Cas9s to RNA-targeting tools.

Introduction

RNA plays a central role in biology as it bridges the flow of genetic information from DNA to proteins. Significant effort has been devoted to developing therapeutics that alter the expression level, splicing pattern, or sequence content of mRNA. Because the consequence of RNA editing is not heritable, inadvertent off-targeting events will not result in heritable genetic scars. When combined with long-persistence delivery tools such as adenovirus-associated virus (AAV),1 a single delivery of RNA editor can lead to a long-lasting impact.2
Tools developed from the Cas9 family of RNA-guided DNases have revolutionized genomic medicine.3,4,5 Serving as the effector of the type II CRISPR-Cas system, Cas9 utilizes the associated crRNA/tracrRNA as the guide, opens R-loop at the matching DNA target that is flanked by an interference protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM), and introduces a double-strand break via its HNH and RuvC nuclease domains.6,7,8,9,10,11 It was later discovered that Cas9 originated from IscB, an RNA-guided homing nuclease in the IS200/605 family of transposons.12,13 The associated OMEGA RNA (ωRNA) is a natural fusion of crRNA and tracrRNA, twice their combined size, and plays additional roles than driving ribonucleoprotein (RNP) assembly and serving as the guide.13,14 IscB protein is one-third or half the size of a typical Cas9 and lacks the REC domain in Cas9. Nonetheless, it adopts a similar overall architecture to Cas9, searching for and cleaving at the DNA target using the same mechanism (Figure 1A).15,16,17 Even the built-in allosteric motion in the HNH nuclease domain is conserved between IscB and Cas9.17,18,19,20,21 IscB’s compact size and tunable DNA nicking activities make it a desirable platform for CRISPR 2.0-type genome editing applications, such as base editing and prime editing.22,23 While the naturally occurring IscBs have marginal editing efficiency in human cells, we and others showed that the engineered versions can achieve much higher insertion or deletion (indel) and base editing efficiencies.24,25,26
Many DNA-targeting CRISPR effectors, including Cascade, Cas9, and Cas12f, have been shown to also bind single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in an RNA-guided fashion.27,28,29,30 Some Cas9 homologs were shown to be further capable of ssRNA cleavage.31,32,33 This activity in some, but not all, cases requires the assistance of a PAMer ssDNA oligo (i.e., SpCas9).27,31 A dead version of SpCas9 was named RCas9 and utilized for RNA tracking or transcript knockdown.34,35 Cas7-11, the type III-D CRISPR-Cas effector, was also shown to be capable of RNA targeting in human cells.36 However, neither RCas9 nor Cas7-11 gained popularity in in vivo applications, presumably because their performance was not robust. The type III effectors have also been utilized for in vivo RNA knockdown in human cells37,38; however, the multi-component systems are cumbersome to use. Most researchers chose Cas13 from type VI CRISPR systems for RNA-guided RNA-editing applications.39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47 However, the majority of Cas13s further cleave the bystander mRNAs, and this collateral damage was shown to be quite toxic to bacterial and mammalian cells.42,48 In fact, cytotoxicity was the main reservation for moving Cas13-based therapeutics into clinical trials.
In this study, we show that IscB can be converted into an exclusive RNA-targeting tool when its target-adjacent motif (TAM) interaction domain (TID) is deleted. The resulting R-IscB mediates a robust and versatile set of RNA-guided RNA-targeting applications in eukaryotic cells, including splicing perturbation, mRNA cleavage, RNA-guided A-to-I editing, and RNA-guided trans-splicing. The former two activities can be used to target dominant-negative genetic diseases, whereas the latter two can find usage in curing recessive genetic diseases through sequence correction at the mRNA level. R-IscB is more active than Cas13 and has no discernible cytotoxicity in human cells. We further show that four different Cas9s can be converted to an exclusive RNA-targeting enzyme following the same approach. These tools are attractive alternatives to Cas13 in research and medicine.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Wild-type IscB also binds ssDNA and ssRNA but strongly prefers dsDNA

To explore the usage of IscB for RNA targeting, we first tested its single-stranded nucleic acid binding and cleavage activities in vitro. In electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), O. geu IscB-ωRNA RNP bound strongly and specifically to guide-complementary ssDNA and ssRNA, but not to the non-complementary controls. The apparent dissociation constants were better than 32 nM (Figure 1B). The multiple binding species likely correspond to complexes in different conformations rather than the

Discussion

There is a need for new RNA-guided RNA-targeting tools because the current tool of choice, Cas13, has undesirable cytotoxicity in eukaryotic cells. This prevented Cas13-based applications from moving into clinics. In vitro RNA-targeting activity has been reported for Cas9 and others. However, robust in vivo RNA-targeting applications have yet to emerge from them. Through in-depth mechanistic studies on the IscB system, we identified the root cause of the problem and found a solution to unmask

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Ailong Ke (ailong.ke@yale.edu).

Materials availability

Plasmids generated in this study are available from Addgene. All other reagents are available upon request.

Data and code availability

All analysis code for NGS data processing in this study is available from the lead contact upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Eugene Koonin, Kira Makarova, Chase Beisel, and Yan Zhang for helpful discussions. Funding: this work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grant number R35GM118174 to A.K. W.T. is supported by the Searle Scholars Program (SSP-2021-113), the Cancer Research Foundation Young Investigator Program, the American Cancer Society (RSG-22-043-01-ET), and the David & Lucile Packard Foundation (2022-74685).

Author contributions

C.X. and A.K. conceived the idea and designed the biochemistry and genome editing experiments. C.X. cloned constructs and performed genome editing experiments. C.X. and X.N. performed bulk biochemistry experiments. X.N. and A.K. designed and performed single-molecule experiments. H.S. analyzed NGS data. H.Y. and W.T. enhanced IscB activity in mammalian cells and performed primary cell editing experiments. C.X. and A.K. generated figures and wrote the manuscript. A.K. supervised the work.

Declaration of interests

Yale University and Cornell University have filed provisional patents on RNA-targeting-based genome editing applications by the engineered IscB and Cas9.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Bacterial Strains
Escherichia coli DH5-alphaNEBC2987H
Escherichia coli T7 Express lysYNEB70235
Escherichia coli Rosetta (DE3) Competent CellsNovagen70954
Plasmids
Wild-type NmeCas9 with sgRNAAddgene71474
Wild-type RfxCas13dAddgene141322
In vivo version of wild-type NmeCas9 with sgRNAAddgene115694
In vivo version of Dead PspCas13b with ADAR2dd (E488Q/T375G)Addgene103871
In vivo version of RfxCas13dAddgene171380
In vivo version of SaCas9 with sgRNAAddgene99735
In vivo

References (86)

  • N. Matsumoto et al.

    Crystal Structure of Silkworm PIWI-Clade Argonaute Siwi Bound to piRNA

    Cell

    (2016)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Two Distant Catalytic Sites Are Responsible for C2c2 RNase Activities

    Cell

    (2017)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    Structural Basis for the RNA-Guided Ribonuclease Activity of CRISPR-Cas13d

    Cell

    (2018)
  • Y. Hua et al.

    Antisense masking of an hnRNP A1/A2 intronic splicing silencer corrects SMN2 splicing in transgenic mice

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2008)
  • K. Fitzgerald et al.

    Effect of an RNA interference drug on the synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and the concentration of serum LDL cholesterol in healthy volunteers: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • R. Kole et al.

    Exon skipping therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Q. Jiang et al.

    Hyper-Editing of Cell-Cycle Regulatory and Tumor Suppressor RNA Promotes Malignant Progenitor Propagation

    Cancer Cell

    (2019)
  • S. Zilberzwige-Tal et al.

    Reprogrammable RNA-targeting CRISPR systems evolved from RNA toxin-antitoxins

    Cell

    (2025)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Characterization of RNA editing and gene therapy with a compact CRISPR-Cas13 in the retina

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2024)
  • L. Cong et al.

    Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems

    Science

    (2013)
  • M. Jinek et al.

    A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity

    Science

    (2012)
  • P. Mali et al.

    RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9

    Science

    (2013)
  • C. Anders et al.

    Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease

    Nature

    (2014)
  • G. Gasiunas et al.

    Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2012)
  • F. Jiang et al.

    STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition

    Science

    (2015)
  • J.E. Garneau et al.

    The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA

    Nature

    (2010)
  • R. Sapranauskas et al.

    The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2011)
  • V.V. Kapitonov et al.

    ISC, a Novel Group of Bacterial and Archaeal DNA Transposons That Encode Cas9 Homologs

    J. Bacteriol.

    (2015)
  • H. Altae-Tran et al.

    The widespread IS200/IS605 transposon family encodes diverse programmable RNA-guided endonucleases

    Science

    (2021)
  • Z. Weinberg et al.

    Exceptional structured noncoding RNAs revealed by bacterial metagenome analysis

    Nature

    (2009)
  • K. Kato et al.

    Structure of the IscB-omegaRNA ribonucleoprotein complex, the likely ancestor of CRISPR-Cas9

    Nat. Commun.

    (2022)
  • S. Hirano et al.

    Structure of the OMEGA nickase IsrB in complex with omegaRNA and target DNA

    Nature

    (2022)
  • G. Schuler et al.

    Structural basis for RNA-guided DNA cleavage by IscB-omegaRNA and mechanistic comparison with Cas9

    Science

    (2022)
  • J.C. Cofsky et al.

    CRISPR-Cas9 bends and twists DNA to read its sequence

    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.

    (2022)
  • J.P.K. Bravo et al.

    Structural basis for mismatch surveillance by CRISPR-Cas9

    Nature

    (2022)
  • M. Pacesa et al.

    R-loop formation and conformational activation mechanisms of Cas9

    Nature

    (2022)
  • S.H. Sternberg et al.

    Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9

    Nature

    (2015)
  • A.V. Anzalone et al.

    Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA

    Nature

    (2019)
  • A.C. Komor et al.

    Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage

    Nature

    (2016)
  • D. Han et al.

    Development of miniature base editors using engineered IscB nickase

    Nat. Methods

    (2023)
  • L. Han et al.

    Engineering miniature IscB nickase for robust base editing with broad targeting range

    Nat. Chem. Biol.

    (2024)
  • H. Yan et al.

    Assessing and engineering the IscB-omegaRNA system for programmed genome editing

    Nat. Chem. Biol.

    (2024)
  • B. Wiedenheft et al.

    Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system

    Nature

    (2011)
  • 4
    Lead contact
    View full text