Login or register to continue
Or use

House gives final approval to bipartisan housing bill aimed at lowering costs

Comments 8

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House gave final approval Tuesday to a broad bipartisan bill aimed at lowering the cost of housing, with lawmakers in both parties eager to show progress on affordability issues ahead of this year’s midterm elections.

The 358-32 vote sends the bill to President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it into law Wednesday at the Capitol. The Senate passed the legislation 85-5 on Monday.

The legislation would reduce federal regulations, streamline environmental reviews, speed up the construction process and curb the influence of corporate landlords by limiting their ability to purchase single-family homes. It represents one of the most sweeping efforts in decades to increase the supply of housing and bring down prices, as voter frustration runs high about the cost of living.

Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California, who helped negotiate the bill, said the median age of a first-time homebuyer is now 40 and rents have soared some 47% since the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Our country must do better and today we will,” she said.

Dozens of bills were combined to create the final package after months of negotiations, creating a rare moment of bipartisanship in a congressional session that has been plagued by bitter standoffs.

House Financial Services Chairman French Hill, an Arkansas Republican who worked with Waters and the Senate on the bill, said it is the first time in years that Congress has come together to make “measurable, accountable changes” to the nation’s housing laws.

The bill will “help build more homes to meet that growing demand and keep the American dream within reach,” he said.

The bill expands financing and protects renters

The legislation on its way to Trump would expand financing, encourage the development of “innovative housing” like modular homes, require new renter protections and enhance programs that aim to end homelessness.

It would also offer funding to local governments that build more housing, including Community Development Block Grant money to places exceeding the median rate of homebuilding. It would provide new dollars for communities to turn abandoned infrastructure into housing, and it offers a framework for communities that want to reform outdated zoning regulations, which often limit larger housing developments.

ln addition, the bill would raise limits on the number of public housing units that can receive financing for renovations and codify a recovery program to help expedite funds to communities rebuilding after disaster.

The legislation does not include a Senate provision that would have required investors to sell newly constructed homes within seven years.

Housing costs are a concern for both parties

Republicans and Democrats have embraced the bill as a way to show they are addressing the nation’s affordability crisis, driven in part by rising home prices due to a shortage of affordable housing. The U.S. housing market has been in a slump dating back to 2022, when mortgage rates began to climb from pandemic-era lows.

Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes have been hovering close to a 4-million annual pace going back to 2023 — well short of the 5.2-million annual pace that’s historically been the norm. Sales slowed last year to a 30-year low and have remained sluggish so far this year, declining in January and February versus a year earlier.

The Economic Report of the President in April found a shortage of 10 million homes, while a report this month from the Joint Center For Housing Studies at Harvard University found sales of existing homes were at three-decade lows and inventories were rising due to high home buying costs. “Cost burdens for both renters and owners continue to climb, while assistance remains profoundly underfunded,” the report said.

While the median U.S. monthly rent has been declining for nearly three years, it was still 17.2% higher in May than it was before the pandemic, according to data from Realtor.com.

The legislation drew widespread support in the housing community, both from organizations representing landlords and large property owners as well as groups that advocate for tenants and low-income renters.

It also brought together Republicans and Democrats, many of whom noted the unusual level of bipartisanship ahead of the vote.

“In this polarized and angry Congress, we are actually getting something done,” said Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn.

——

Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this report.

Casey writes about the environment, housing and inequality for The Associated Press. He lives in Boston.

Conversation

|
All comments are subject to our Community Guidelines.
Please note that comments are not moderated immediately — every post is reviewed before appearing publicly to ensure it meets our community guidelines. This means there may be a delay before your comment is visible.

All Comments

    1. Comment by MxcoPaidYetLOL.

      I'm glad they're trying something, but this feels too little too late. And why did the Republicans remove the provision that required corporate landlords to sell the units after 7 years? Corporate landlords played a huge role in getting us to this mess in the first place!

      • Reply by nononono.

        The "mess" is mostly caused by zoning boards.

        These mini-governments make it impossible to meet demand with supply.

        The corporate landlords are just taking advantage of the pricing inefficciencies that result from all that market distortion.

        If your local zoning board could determine the characteristics of the bread at a grocery stores, half of America would never have a sandwich again.

      • Reply by CommonSense4All.

        "According to the Cato Institute, forcing large-scale developers to automatically divest from entire neighborhoods after seven years could result in the displacement and potential eviction of millions of renters."

    2. Comment by nononono.

      Constitutional amendment: Tax all legal persons at the same rate (net worth, not income).

      No deductions for anything (if the feds vote to give certain persons $, they write a check).

      To bring in the same revenue as last year, universal tax rate would be under 2.5%.

      Can you imagine what it would be like to have 97.5% of the economy free from federal government influence? Trillions of dollars of distorted economic policies would die overnight.

      Dump the command economy and captured markets culture. That's for China. And they are better at it anyway.

      Free markets for a free nation.

      • Reply by MxcoPaidYetLOL.

        Terrible idea.

      • Reply by nononono.

        Wow. Great analysis. You've convinced me.

    3. Comment by KendallGrubb.

      We as the electorate need more cooperation and progress from our legislative branch. Well done! 250🇺🇸

      • Comment by shesurfs.

        Tax billionaires.

        Tax trillionaires.