[–] ▶ №16536646[Quote]
he does nothing for the site and gets his joons to do it
▶ №16536647[Quote]>>16536666
I don't hate them because I don't usually hate people on this website but I think Quote is more blunderful than inherently malicious.
▶ №16536648[Quote]
i think hes just doing it for gegs, which is based
▶ №16536652[Quote]>>16536658
he's added 0 stuff and even things like the cacacaust weren't entirely his idea
▶ №16536658[Quote]>>16536660
>>16536652So leaning into "Quote is incompetent".
▶ №16536687[Quote]>>16536700
>>16536660I think I can see a lot of parallels between Quote and Tsar Nicholas the II
>Both are incompetent>Both are incharge at a time of decline>Both succeeded a reppressive leaderJust Nicholas looks more handsome than Quote.
▶ №16536695[Quote]
>>16536678It's some namefag or something idk.
▶ №16536700[Quote]>>16536712
>>16536687quote is tsar nicholas 2 theory
▶ №16536712[Quote]>>16536722
>>16536700He could be a reincarantion of the Tsar.
▶ №16536731[Quote]
>>16536666quads of obsession
▶ №16536739[Quote]
>>16536722In that case who would be Lenin?
▶ №16536740[Quote]>>16536765
I will say that a lot of the bad stuff Quote has done can be chalked up to him being some faggoted teenager as opposed to a malicious actor, you could say the same about Mustard and Cobblestone. I can't envision them as a scheming mastermind like Gustavo Fring. But rather shut-in retards who are completely out of touch with the world they live in.
▶ №16536765[Quote]>>16536781
>>16536740That being said, this doesn't mean they are completely innocent and exempt of criticism because if they want to be in a position of power they have to be a bit more considerate and open.
▶ №16536781[Quote]>>16536788
>>16536765The soysphere would be improved if they were removed from power but unfortunetly the only person who could do that is Quote.
▶ №16536788[Quote]>>16536798
>>16536781I can see what Quote is trying to do with the site but I don't think he's doing it the way it should be done.
▶ №16536798[Quote]>>16536815
>>16536788What is Quote trying to do?
▶ №16536815[Quote]>>16536817>>16536965>>16537110
>>16536798I think he's trying to make the site more laissez-faire where the users award each other for making gems and have that control of what they want to see on the 'log, similar to what Amerimutts do with their economy.
▶ №16536817[Quote]>>16536831
>>16536815(With very little staff interference)
▶ №16536831[Quote]>>16536856
>>16536817So Quote want's to make everyone a janny?
▶ №16536834[Quote]>>16536950
I think he's both a genius and good
▶ №16536856[Quote]>>16536879>>16537110
>>16536831No, but he's trying to let the users have full control of site kulchur without janjans deleting (what they deem) coal
▶ №16536879[Quote]>>16536997
>>16536856If I understant this correctly. Quote's Sharty is a sharty where jannies are removed and 'nishing someone is up to a vote?
▶ №16536950[Quote]
>>16536834OppositeGOD. I kneel.
▶ №16536968[Quote]
>>16536965Did they actually do that?
▶ №16536970[Quote]
>>16536965Yes, a lot like the Jarty (but look how that turned out), ((not saying the same thing will happen of course.))
▶ №16536976[Quote]>>16536982
>>16536640 (OP)Why can't I choose both
▶ №16536982[Quote]
>>16536976It's more of primary reason. It can be both but which one is more plausible.
▶ №16536997[Quote]>>16537010
>>16536879Maybe I'm not explaining it properly consider the following:
Day 1:There is a 'log 3/4 full of gems and 1/4 full of bait. The bait threads get about 100-200 replies while gems get around 10-20 replies. This shows that there is more demand for bait posts than gem posts because the users of the website decide that they want to give a reward (attention and wasted time) to bait as opposed to a gem.
Day 7:Because it is established that users will award bait, the 'log is split between half-bait and half-gem. Bait is still getting replied to fulfilling it's purpose.
Day 14:The 'log is a shithole full of bait.
Best case scenario demand falls for bait as it becomes a dime a dozen. The site returns to homeostasis, and more gems are being posted.
Even better some form of quality control is enforced (on /soy/) but not
too excessively to not make it a rulecucked shithole much like the Swedish Jarty and 4chan where making high-effort stuff isn't really rewarding.
▶ №16537053[Quote]>>16537067
>>16537010Of course some muscle is needed to level the playing field a bit so no one group spirals out of control much like what happened to jakparty.soy
▶ №16537067[Quote]>>16537076
>>16537053So that's the purpose of the Admin?
▶ №16537071[Quote]
fuggen behead qot and his radical unrulecucking whilst also rulecucking the site (cacacaust)
▶ №16537076[Quote]
>>16537067Creating rules pretty much
▶ №16537110[Quote]
>>16536815>>16536856This is how it works. No, seriously.
▶ №16537120[Quote]
(You) create the 'log you want to see, teen.