JustPaste.it
User avatar
@anonymous · 20h · edited: 19m

 

 

[quote=limited time=1781741246 user_id=116835]
A severely damaged city wall and severely damaged buildings inside the city are signs that Chinese troops fought to the death in street to street fighting. An intact wall is a sign of failure to defend the city and abandonment.
 
Because the Japanese themselves wanted the city walls intact if possible since they wanted to use them like in Tengchong. The Japanese would try to capture them intact with ladders if possible.
 
All these city walls or gates suffered huge breaches from Japanese artillery
 
Baoshan city walls were destroyed by artillery. Japanese tried to scale it with ladders but failed with heavy losses and had to bombard the wall and city and use tanks to break through the gate.
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/292795946871
 
https://historyofthesecondworldwar.com/episodes/season-1---return-of-the-shadow/second-sino-japanese-war/52---second-sino-japanese-war-pt.-3---shanghai/
http://media.workercn.cn/sites/media/hbgrb/2014_07/16/GR0801.htm
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E8%BF%9B%E6%94%BB%E5%AE%9D%E5%B1%B1%E5%9F%8E.jpg
 
Baoding city wall was breached with bombs and artillery but it isn't shown clearly here.
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1195-116824.html
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1195-127335.html
 
As everyone knows, the Guanghua gate in Nanjing was heavily bombarded by Japanese artillery until it was destroyed, the Chinese defenders burned tons of the assaulting Japanese troops alive with gasoline (petrol) and wood before going down.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2627213#p2627213
 
Taiyuan city walls with massive damage
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1196-120180.html
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1196-77073.html
 
 
Dezhou city wall damage
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1202-117019.html
 
Taierzhuang city damage
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1202-77140.html
 
 
 
 
Guangzhou city in Henan, where Japan used gas against Chinese wall positions in addition to bombarding the walls until they breached. There was  severe damage to buildings inside the city in house to house street fighting.
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1211-120478.html
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=tAYAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA16
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xLYhAQAAMAAJ&q=guangzhou&dq=guangzhou+castle+gas&pg=PA16
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=tAYAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA10
 
Huangchuan city in Henan
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1211-116967.html
 
 
Eighth Route Army making grenades and land mines in Yan'an, Shaanxi.
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-124662.html
 
Spears with red tassels in Yan'an
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-116776.html
 
Man with matchlock musket in Yan'an
 
https://x.com/fenianraider1/status/1437940845827657731
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-124662.html
 
 
home made cannons and matchlock muskets in Yan'an 
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/uploadfile/2021/0827/20210827090015164.jpg
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-116248.html
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASR3B7QT1R37UPQJ00X.html?iref=koesenso_special_asahicom
 
Militias with swords, matchlock muskets (and regular rifles) and making land mines with Black powder in Yan'an. They seem to be grinding black powder on a mill and filling stone or ceramic or metal mines with the powder.
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-103811.html
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-106829.html
 
soldiers with captured Japanese swords in Yan'an
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-76832.html
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-124666.html
 
red tassel spears and steelmaking in Yan'an
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1222-116206.html
 
 
 
Japanese poison gas attack in Xiangyuan and  Dingxiang counties in Shanxi province
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1196-104340.html
 
Poison gas use in Taihang mountains
 
https://www.krzzjn.com/show-1196-104335.html
 
 
 
 
https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/this-day-in-the-war-in-the-pacific-65-years-ago.6103/page-58
 
https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/second-world-war/war-against-japan/the-sinking-of-pow-transport-ships-in-the-far-east
 
https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2025/09/the-incredible-story-of-the-us-submarine-that-torpedoed-itself-and-sailors-escaped-from-180-feet-below/
 
Video thumb

 
https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/Portals/16/documents/Studies/101-150/AFD-090529-042.pdf
 
https://www.combinedfleet.com/Matsumoto_t.htm
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1780986289 user_id=116835]
west Yunnan
 
https://migflug.com/jetflights/the-flying-tigers-americas-secret-air-war-over-china/
https://www.gokunming.com/en/blog/item/3029/songshan-and-the-1944-battle-for-huitong-bridge
https://time.com/archive/6771574/battle-of-asia-the-gorge-of-the-wu-ti-ho/
https://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601421207,00.html
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1397775772392820&set=a.630315315805540&id=100064812303688
 
Wu Peifu
https://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19240908,00.html
 
 
shin gunto swords
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/RareHistoricalPhotos/comments/1qbm8ok/the_surrender_of_the_japanese_in_british_malaya/
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1rhf7ri/japanese_soldiers_and_taiwanese_aboriginal/
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1tc0u8o/korean_christians_crucified_by_the_japanese/
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/309309.html
https://www.chosun.com/national/weekend/2024/04/13/KLAT3S42RRABRAXH6H2CBOBOQU/
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1thu2kp/british_soldiers_congratulating_imperial_japanese/
https://www.reddit.com/r/wwiipics/comments/jtz4tn/british_soldiers_congratulating_imperial_japanese/
https://x.com/ShoahUkraine/status/2056497591282815321
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryPorn/comments/5hhs2t/women_give_thanks_to_chinese_soldiers_who_held/
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1oqnbu6/a_mongolian_soldier_among_japanese_prisoners_near/
https://www.facebook.com/RusEmbassySouthAfrica/posts/victory81-on-may-11-1939-the-red-army-and-the-mongolian-peoples-republic-mpr-lau/1319329383710779/
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/WW2info/comments/18b7b1i/a_soviet_soldier_inspects_a_group_of_japanese/
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1qdqt0u/a_soviet_soldier_inspects_a_group_of_japanese/
 
 
 
 
Stillwell's command problems
 
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D114-PURL-gpo107590/pdf/GOVPUB-D114-PURL-gpo107590.pdf
https://history.army.mil/portals/143/Images/Publications/catalog/9-2.pdf
 
 
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Time/USA-CBI-Time-7.html
https://history.army.mil/Portals/143/Images/Publications/Publication%20By%20Title%20Images/T%20PDF/CMH_Pub_9-3.pdf?ver=JG0iO8fxb2gsmVf_VWRY6Q%3D%3D
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D114-PURL-gpo107510/pdf/GOVPUB-D114-PURL-gpo107510.pdf
 
[quote]a natural avenue of approach and was coming up on the high ground.4 Troop E, to its left, encountered more difficult terrain and reached the top at 0800.
 
As Troop F moved up the rough trail in an open column, the commander, 1st Lt. Jack L. Knight, was well to the front, and when two Japanese suddenly appeared at the crest, Knight killed them both. So began a display of stern valor and martial skill. Crossing the hill to the reverse slope, Knight found a cluster of Japanese emplacements. Calling up his men, he attacked one after another of the emplacements with grenades. When the Japanese, who seem to have been surprised, steadied and began inflicting heavy casualties on Troop F, Knight kept his attack organized and under control. Though half-blinded by grenade fragments, bleeding heavily, and having seen his brother, Curtis, shot while running to his aid, Knight still fought, still commanded his men, and died as his stubborn will was dragging his shattered body toward one more Japanese emplacement.5
 
The pillbox whose crew had killed Lieutenant Knight had been under fire from a rocket launcher manned by Pfc. Anthony Whitaker. Whitaker put three rounds on the emplacement, all of which failed to explode. Throwing aside his launcher, Whitaker took rifle and grenades and rushed on the pillbox. His effort succeeded, and may have been the turning point.6[/quote]
 
Tengchong, Mount Song, Hengyang, Guilin
 
https://www.cbi-theater.com/roundup/roundup091444.html
 
https://time.com/archive/6822001/world-battlefronts-battle-of-asia-the-sightless-giant/
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/chinas-forgotten-fight-for-freedom.html
https://pacificwrecks.com/airfield/china/hengyang/missions-hengyang.html
http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/sino-japanese-1945.htm
https://www.pacificatrocities.org/sino-japanese-timeline.html
 
 
https://www.scmp.com/video/scmp-originals/3124256/neglected-japanese-wartime-military-pillboxes-offer-window-hong-kongs
https://www.scmp.com/video/hong-kong/1810115/150-pillboxes-and-counting-locating-hong-kongs-pre-wwii-military
https://gwulo.com/pillboxes-in-hong-kong
 
 
Northern Expedition
 
https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/21F11592A3643152EBA8C34335532B5F/9781139054799c11_p527-720_CBO.pdf/nationalist_revolution_from_canton_to_nanking_192328.pdf
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/csafofficial/posts/frank-losonsky-was-one-of-the-youngest-of-the-flying-tigers-a-group-of-311-young/2726987807421283/
https://www.facebook.com/focus.tw/posts/as-china-prepares-to-stage-a-military-parade-wednesday-to-highlight-its-role-in-/1185728110264591/
 
https://www.usmcu.edu/Portals/218/Lodge_The%20Recapture%20of%20Guam.pdf
 
us army air force
https://media.defense.gov/2010/Nov/05/2001329890/-1/-1/0/AFD-101105-012.pdf
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA151688.pdf
 
Malay comfort women
 
https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205208397
https://www.tamucc.edu/library/exhibits/s/hist4350/item/442
https://apjjf.org/2015/13/31/tessa-morris-suzuki/4352
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Allied_Reoccupation_of_the_Andaman_Islands,_1945_SE5226.jpg
https://www.pacificatrocities.org/the-role-of-activism-and-international-pressure.html
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-worldhistory/chapter/35-2-4-japan-and-reckoning-with-history/
https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/topics/world-war-ii
 
 
 
 
https://michaelharrison.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/An-outline-history-of-China-FLP-Peking-1959.pdf
https://captaincool07.medium.com/last-stand-of-chinese-soldiers-in-nanjing-1937-be2b82cf54d2
http://www.19371213.net/en/information/news/202311/t20231113_4096251.html
https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/39454/1/FullText.pdf?__cf_chl_tk=ZSrRKS8ZZDPox2oFWAHaBDQ2uBwaMIFMGajgfuVWIuI-1780894426-1.0.1.1-FE2lLyA0tjAC4TXRxRcu2fZVdmsoV9xs5ebGGNUhUuk
https://dokumen.pub/a-dark-page-in-history-the-nanjing-massacre-and-post-massacre-social-conditions-recorded-in-british-diplomatic-dispatches-admiralty-documents-and-u-s-naval-intelligence-reports-new-updated-edition-0761870946-9780761870944.html
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bX5_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA160#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bX5_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PR39&dq=guanghua+burned+%22a+dark+page+in+history%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2toePsfaUAxXZVKQEHVFuKkgQ6AF6BAgHEAM
 
https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/travel-leisure/article/2150410/five-things-do-chinas-volcanic-city-tengchong-hiking
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ELDlCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1187&dq=%22lost+16,000+capturing+taierchwang%22
 
Japanese chemical weapons cleanup
 
https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/explosive-end-for-japans-second-world-war-chemical-weapons/7449.article
 
Tianjiazhen floods
 
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0968344520961548
 
https://www.pacificatrocities.org/blog/battle-of-wuhan-the-battle-of-tianjiazhen-part-4
 
1927 Chinese airforce head
 
https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1927/1927-ny/v04-n298-NY-dec-29-1927-DW-LOC.pdf
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1780653762 user_id=116835]
Also, there are some quotes by Korean nationalists pretending to be Japanese nationalist propagandists on the internet, like Koreans editing Japanese wikipedia and posting this quote they attribute to Hideko Tojo upon the fall of Nanjing, projecting what happened to Koreans onto Han people.
 
Korean nationalists are literally making up Japanese propaganda and passing it off as WW2 statements to push their own nationalist agendas.
 
[quote]Why do you cry over the fall of Nanjing? You Han Chinese were slaves to the Xianbei, slaves to the Goguryeo, slaves to the Mongols, and slaves to the Manchus. We Japanese are simply the next in line to rule you.[/quote]
 
Japanese version edited by Korean nationalists living in Japan onto Japanese wikipedia with foul attacks against Chinese women (projecting what Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus and Japanese did against Korean women onto Han people)
 
[quote] 東条英機が頻繁に使用した言葉だという記録がある。当時、日本軍の南京占領後、東条英機は支那のちゃんころの歴史は漢民族の女性の尻で成し遂げた歴史にすぎないと言った。また、支那の歴史は異民族の支配に点綴された歴史だと言ったがこれは高句麗やモンゴル族、鮮卑、契丹、そして満州族などが中国を支配した歴史的事実の根拠から出た言葉である。東条英機はこれに加えてちゃんころは人間の姿をしたゴキブリのようなものだという発言をした。(原文ママ)南京の日本軍、藤原彰著
 
東条英機が頻繁に使用した言葉だという記録がある。当時、日本軍の南京占領後、東条英機は支那のちゃんころの歴史は漢民族の女性の尻で成し遂げた歴史にすぎないと言った。また、支那の歴史は異民族の支配に点綴された歴史だと言ったがこれは高句麗やモンゴル族、鮮卑、契丹、そして満州族などが中国を支配した歴史的事実の根拠から出た言葉である。東条英機はこれに加えてちゃんころは人間の姿をしたゴキブリのようなものだという発言をした。(原文ママ)南京の日本軍、藤原彰著
[/quote]
 
Korean version edited by Korean nationalists into Korean wikipedia.
 
[quote]도조 히데키는 "챵코로(짱깨)의 역사는 한족(漢族)여성의 엉덩이로 이룩한 역사일 뿐이다. 중국은 이민족의 지배로 점철된 역사이다"라고 주장하였는데 이것은 고구려가 중국을 정복하였고 선비족, 몽골족, 만주족 등 여러 이민족에게 지배당한 한족의 역사를 비하하는 말이었다.
 
[1] 도조 히데키는 "챵코로(짱깨)의 역사는 한족(漢族)여성의 엉덩이로 이룩한 역사일 뿐이다.중국은 이민족의 지배로 점철된 역사이다"라고 주장하였는데 이것은 이것은 고구려가 중국을 정복하였고 선비족,몽골족,만주족 등 여러 이민족이 중국을 정복했기 때문에 나온 말이다.[2] 
[/quote]
 
This appears to be fabricated, and made by Korean nationalist given the insertion of Goguryeo, which never ruled a single piece of Han Chinese land in history (on the contrary, Han Chinese repeatedly sacked and committed mass rape against Goguryeo during the Han dynasty and Cao Wei, before the Sui-Tang wars against Goguryeo which Koreans love to tout)
 
[b]Not to mention, that the Xianbei also sacked and raped Goguryeo's capital Hwando and the Mongols and Manchus both invaded Korea, and committed mass atrocities against Koreans, including mass rape, mass enslavement and the Japanese also massacred and raped 1 million Koreans in the Imjin war and then mass raped Koreans in the Gando massacre.[/b]
 
And every single one of those "invaders" gave their women to Han Chinese. 
 
Xianbei like Murong and Tuoba married their daughters to Han men, Sima Chuzhi married a Xianbei Tuoba wife and his son Sima Jinlong married a Xiongnu Juqu wife. Other Han from the Liu and Xiao families like Liu Hui married Xianbei Tuoba women. 
The Northern Yan Han ruler. Feng Ba married a Rouran woman, Yujiulü Zhaoyi 
His brother Feng Hong married a Xianbei Murong princess.
 
Han Chinese also used to rule and massacre Xianbei before the Xianbei dynasties were established, the Han Chinese inspector of Liang province during Western Jin was Zhang Gui and he defeated Xianbei rebels in Liangzhou in 301 and in 305 he defeated and beheaded Xianbei leader Ruoluobabeng (若羅拔能) and captured 100,000 Xianbei as slaves.
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%BE%8C%E6%BC%A2%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B785#%E5%A4%AB%E9%A4%98%E5%9C%8B
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%99%89%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7086#%E5%BC%B5%E8%BB%8C
 
[quote]  張軌,字士彥,安定烏氏人,漢常山景王耳十七代孫也。家世孝廉,以儒學顯。父溫,為太官令。軌少明敏好學,有器望,姿儀典則,與同郡皇甫謐善,隱于宜陽女幾山。泰始初,受叔父錫官五品。中書監張華與軌論經義及政事損益,甚器之,謂安定中正為蔽善抑才,乃美為之談,以為二品之精。衛將軍楊珧辟為掾,除太子舍人,累遷散騎常侍、征西軍司。
 
  軌以時方多難,陰圖據河西,筮之,遇《泰》之《觀》,乃投策喜曰:「霸者兆也。」於是求為涼州。公卿亦舉軌才堪禦遠。永甯初,出為護羌校尉、涼州刺史。于時鮮卑反叛,寇盜從橫,軌到官,即討破之,斬首萬餘級,遂威著西州,化行河右。以宋配、陰充、氾瑗、陰澹為股肱謀主,征九郡胄子五百人,立學校,始置崇文祭酒,位視別駕,春秋行鄉射之禮。秘書監繆世征、少府摯虞夜觀星象,相與言曰:「天下方亂,避難之國唯涼土耳。張涼州德量不恆,殆其人乎!」及河間、成都二王之難,遣兵三千,東赴京師。初,漢末金城人陽成遠殺太守以叛,郡人馮忠赴屍號哭,嘔血而死。張掖人吳詠為護羌校尉馬賢所辟,後為太尉龐參掾,參、賢相誣,罪應死,各引詠為證,詠計理無兩直,遂自刎而死。參、賢慚悔,自相和釋。軌皆祭其墓而旌其子孫。永興中,鮮卑若羅拔能皆為寇,軌遣司馬宋配擊之,斬拔能,俘十餘萬口,威名大震。惠帝遣加安西將軍,封安樂鄉侯,邑千戶。於是大城姑臧。其城本匈奴所築也,南北七里,東西三里,地有龍形,故名臥龍城。初,漢末博士敦煌侯瑾謂其門人曰:「後城西泉水當竭,有雙闕起其上,與東門相望。中有霸者出焉。」至魏嘉平中,郡官果起學館,築雙闕於泉上,與東門正相望矣。至是,張氏遂霸河西。
 
Zhang Gui, courtesy name Shiyan, was a native of Wushi in Anding Commandery, and a 17th-generation descendant of Zhang Er, King Jing of Changshan during the Han Dynasty. For generations, his family members were nominated as Xiaolian (Filial and Incorrupt) and distinguished themselves through Confucian scholarship. His father, Zhang Wen, served as the Director of the Palace Domestic Service. From his youth, Zhang Gui was intelligent, quick-witted, and fond of learning; he possessed a grand reputation, a refined demeanor, and an exemplary carriage. He was close friends with his fellow commanderyman Huangfu Mi, and they lived in seclusion at Mount Nvji in Yiyang. At the beginning of the Taishi era, he accepted his uncle Zhang Xi's fifth-rank official position. Zhang Hua, the Director of the Secretariat, discussed Confucian classics and the merits and drawbacks of political affairs with Zhang Gui, and greatly admired his talent. Believing that the Zhongzheng (Local Rectifier) of Anding Commandery had suppressed and obscured a great talent, Zhang Hua spoke highly of him, considering him of the finest calibre for a second-rank evaluation. General of the Guards Yang Yao then recruited him as an assistant, after which he was appointed as a Palace Attendant to the Crown Prince, and through successive promotions became a Cavalier Attendant-in-Ordinary and Military Supervisor of the Campaigning-West Army.
 
Observing that the realm was facing many hardships at the time, Zhang Gui secretly planned to occupy the Hexi region. He performed divination regarding this and obtained the hexagram change from Tai to Guan. He threw down his divination sticks in delight and said, "This is the omen of a hegemon." Consequently, he requested to be assigned to Liang Province. The dukes and ministers also recommended Zhang Gui, stating his talent was capable of managing distant frontiers. At the beginning of the Yongning era, he departed the capital to serve as the Colonel Protecting the Qiang and Governor of Liang Province. At that time, the Xianbei tribes were in rebellion, and bandits and raiders plundered at will. Upon arriving at his post, Zhang Gui immediately attacked and defeated them, decapitating over ten thousand enemies; consequently, his prestige resounded across the Western Provinces, and his civilising influence spread throughout the lands west of the Yellow River. He appointed Song Pei, Yin Chong, Fan Yuan, and Yin Dan as his core advisors and strategists. He recruited five hundred elite youths from the nine commanderies to establish schools, created the position of Libationer for the Venerations of Literacy—a rank equivalent to the Biejia (Regional Vice-Governor)—and observed the traditional seasonal township archery rites. Miao Shizheng, the Director of the Secret Secretariat, and Zhi Yu, the Director of the Palace Imperial Outbuildings, observed the astrological signs at night and remarked to one another, "The realm is about to fall into chaos, and the only land to escape the hardships will be the Liang territory. Governor Zhang of Liang Province possesses extraordinary virtue and capacity; he must surely be the person." When the disturbances involving the two princes of Hejian and Chengdu arose, Zhang Gui dispatched three thousand troops eastward to assist the imperial capital. Previously, at the end of the Han Dynasty, Yang Chengyuan, a native of Jincheng, killed the commandery administrator in rebellion; Feng Zhong, a fellow native of the commandery, rushed to the corpse, wept bitterly, and coughed up blood until he died. Wu Yong, a native of Zhangye, had been recruited by Ma Xian, the Colonel Protecting the Qiang, and later became an assistant to Grand Veteran Pang Can; when Pang Can and Ma Xian accused one another of treason—a crime punishable by death—both summoned Wu Yong to testify for them. Realizing that his testimony could not validate both sides, Wu Yong slit his own throat and died. Pang Can and Ma Xian felt deeply ashamed and remorseful, and consequently reconciled with one another. Zhang Gui performed sacrificial rites at both their graves and honored their descendants. During the Yongxing era, the Xianbei chieftain Ruoluobuneng and his tribes ran rampant as raiders. Zhang Gui dispatched his Major, Song Pei, to strike them; Song Pei decapitated Ruoluobuneng and captured over one hundred thousand captives, causing Zhang Gui's military prestige to shake the realm. Emperor Hui dispatched an envoy to elevate his rank to General who Pacifies the West and enfeoffed him as the Marquess of Anle District, with a fief of one thousand households. Following this, he significantly expanded the city walls of Guzang. The city had originally been built by the Xiongnu; it measured seven li from north to south and three li from east to west. Because the terrain resembled the shape of a dragon, it was named Wolong (Crouching Dragon) City. Previously, at the end of the Han Dynasty, Hou Jin, a Scholar from Dunhuang, told his disciples, "In the future, the spring water west of the city will dry up, and a pair of watchtowers will rise above it, facing the East Gate directly. From within, a hegemon will emerge." By the Jiaping era of the Wei Dynasty, the commandery officials did indeed construct a schoolhouse and built a pair of watchtowers above the spring, directly facing the East Gate. By this point, the Zhang clan had established its hegemony over the Hexi region.[/quote]
 
The Khitan in the Liao dynasty ruled over the Jurchens for two hundred years and forced Jurchens to give them their Jurchen virgin girls to sleep with Khitan men and then later took married Jurchen women to their beds.
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/松漠紀聞 
 
[quote]大遼盛時,銀牌天使至女真,每夕必欲薦枕者。其國舊輪中、下戶作止宿處,以未出適女待之。後求海東青使者絡繹,恃大國使命,惟擇美好婦人,不問其有夫及閥閱高者,女真浸忿,遂叛。
 
During the peak of the Great Liao Dynasty’s prosperity, whenever their silver-tablet imperial envoys arrived in the Jurchen territories, they insisted on having a woman provided to share their bed every night [3]. According to the old customs of the Jurchen state, middle- and lower-class households took turns providing lodging, using unmarried daughters to host and attend to these envoys [3]. Later on, as envoys dispatched to hunt for gyrfalcons (Haidongqing) arrived in continuous successions, they grew to rely on the power and authority of their great empire’s missions [3]. They began exclusively selecting the most beautiful women, completely disregarding whether they were already married or belonged to high-ranking, distinguished families [3]. Consequently, the Jurchen people grew increasingly furious and ultimately rose in open rebellion [3].[/quote]
 
Tang dynasty China ruled Mongolia as the Protectorate General to Pacify the North and Chanyu Protectorate after conquering the Eastern Turkic Khaganate and the Khitan which resulted in Gokturk Khagan Bilge Khan erecting the Orkhon inscription saying that that Turk men were forced to fight for China against other enemies like Goguryeo and the Turk girls became slaves of Tang China, Han dynasty China also destroyed the Northern Xiongnu and carved the Yanran inscriptions into Outer Mongolia's mountains to commemorate their victory over them.
 
Qin dynasty Chinese general Meng Tian cleansed the Xiongnu under Touman from the Ordos loop of Inner Mongolia.
 
Genghis Khan massacred and raped Jurchens and Tanguts, Genghis took a Wanyan Jurchen Princess, Princess Qiguo as his concubine, and also a Tangut Western Xia Princess from the Tuoba Li family of the Tanguts. Genghis wanted to take revenge against the Wanyan Jurchen for torturing his great great uncle Ambaghai Khan to death on a wooden donkey.
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/新元史/卷104#岐國公主
 
[quote]  太祖公主皇后,完顏氏。金衛紹王女也。太祖圍燕京,金宣宗納女請和。太祖命阿剌淺使於金,金諸帝女未嫁者七人,後最秀慧,宮中稱為小姐姐。宜宗封為岐國公主,以遣嫁焉。引見阿刺淺,即拜後於階下,又請後北鄉拜,後不敢拒。
The Emperor’s (Genghis Khan's) Princess-Empress, surnamed Wanyan, was a daughter of King Weishao of the Jin Dynasty. When the Emperor besieged Yanjing (modern-day Beijing), Emperor Xuanzong of the Jin Dynasty offered a princess in marriage to sue for peace. The Emperor dispatched Alaqian as an envoy to the Jin court, where among the seven unmarried imperial daughters of Jin, the Empress was the most refined and intelligent, known in the palace as the "Little Sister" (Xiaojiejie). Emperor Xuanzong enfeoffed her as the Princess of Qi and sent her off to be married. When she was presented to Alaqian, he immediately bowed to the Empress at the foot of the steps and requested that she bow toward the north (toward Genghis Khan), which the Empress did not dare refuse.[/quote]
 
Genghis had Han Chinese Tumen generals leading Han armies with him against the Jurchens and Khwarezmians like Shi Bingzhi (father of Shi Tianlin, grandfather of Shi Gang, and uncle of Shi Tianlin), Guo Baoyu (father of Guo Dehai and grandfather of Guo Kan).
 
Shi Tianllin served as a military judge in the Mongol invasion of eastern and central Europe under Batu Khan, reaching eastern Austria and eastern Germany. Guo Baoyu helped Genghis conquer Khwarezmia in Central Asia and Guo Kan helped Hulagu Khan and Kitbuqa Noyan conquer Baghdad in Iraq.
 
Kublai Khan married off one of his own daughters to the Han Zhao Xian, emperor Gong of Song. Han tumen general Shi Bingzhi had a Jurchen wife and Han wife, and his son Shi Tianze had two Jurchen wives, a Korean wife and a Han wife. Shi Tianze's son Shi Gang married a Mongol Kerait woman. Another one of Shi Tianze's son married a daughter of Menggu Baer, a Mongol official.
 
Han Chinese ruled Manchus during the Ming dynasty. The Ming Hongwu and Yongle emperors had Manchu eunuchs like Yishiha, who led Ming expeditions against his own Jurchen (Manchu) people in the Amur river region and erected the Yongning temple stele in what is now "Outer Manchuria" in Russia. The Ming ruled the Jurchens in the Nurgan regional military commission and the Ming also created the Jianzhou Jurchen guard, appointing Mentemu (MongKe Temur) as a chief inside it, forcing Koreans in Joseon to back off and making Mentemu pay tribute to China and not Korea. Han officials and officers had Jurchen concubines during Ming rule. Nurhaci and Aisin Gioro were descended from Mentemu and rebelled against the Ming.
 
Nurhaci's maternal grandfather was Jurchen chief Wang Gao who unsuccessfully tried to storm Fushun in 1573 and the Ming executed Wang Gao by death by 1,000 cuts (slow slicing) in 1576. Nurhaci's father Taksi and paternal grandfather Giocangga were killed by Ming troops in one of their regular punitive expeditions due to their rivalry with pro-Ming Jurchen chief Nikan Wailan.
 
The Ming Chenghua emperor launched a mass campaign against the Jurchen including slaughter and rape called Chenghua Liting (成化犁庭), literally "ploughing" the Jurchens in 1478-1479
 
The Manchus handed out Aisin Gioro Manchu princesses to Han Chinese officers and officials who defected like Wu Sangui's son Wu Yingxiong, Geng Zhongming's family, Fan Wencheng's son Fan Chengzuo married a Manchu woman from the Niohuru clan.
Han banner general Nian Gengyao had two Manchu wives, a daughter of Nalan Xingde and an Aisin Gioro woman, daughter of Duke Suyan. 
Han banner general Sun Sike's wife Lady Ji was the Aisin Gioro Manchu Gurun Princess Aohan, Sun Sike's son Sun Cheng'en married the fourth daughter of Manchu Prince (Junwang) Zhi and a daughter of Manchu Beile Haishan, his other son Sun Chengyn married the 14th daughter of the Manchu Kangxi emperor, Princess Heshuo Quejing. 
Han Chinese bannerman Li Zhiying's son Li Haiqing married a Korean woman Jin (Kim), daughter of Korean jin jian and niece of imperial Consort Shujia, a Korean concubine of the Manchu Qianlong emperor. her sister Li Haiqing also married a Manchu Aisin Gioro woman, daughter of Qianfu of the Plain Yellow Banner and his wife. Lady Donggo of the Manchu Plain White banner, her grandfather was the Manchu Fiyanggu of the Donggo  clan.
Han Chinese bannerman Gao Heng married a Manchu woman from the Nara clan, daughter of Derbi, and Gao Heng was the son of Gao Bin.
Gao Heng's second son Gao Fang and fourth son Gao Qi both married Manchu women from the Niohuru clan. 
Gao Qi's son Gao Zhuo married a Manchu woman from the Niohuru clan, elder sister of consort Shun.
Gao Jin was a son of Gao Shuming and Gao Jin was a nephew of Gao Bin. Gao Jin married a Manchu woman from a Wang clan, Delin from the Plain Blue banner. Gao Jin's eldest son Shulin married Manchu woman Lady Yi (her father was Yindebu a Manchu of the Bordered White Banner)
Gao Shulin’s son Zijilang'a inherited the title of First-Class Baron; his wife was from the Manchu Zhangjia clan (her grandfather was a Manchu of the Bordered Yellow Banner Yengišan (Yinjishan)). Zijilang'a's son was Changshan.
 
Han bannerman Shoushan, a descendant of Han Ming general Yuan Chonghuan, married a Mongol woman, daughter of a Mongol Dorbod banner chief.
 
Han men moved into Mongoila during the Ming and Qing and married Mongol women.
 
https://search.proquest.com/openview/5c6d78516e80433b02e24bbac4409096/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23615320?seq=5
 
[b]First, off, the ancient "Korean" kingdom of Gojoseon itself was ruled by Chinese dynasties, first by Jizi (Gija) of the Shang dynasty and then by Wei Man (Wi Man) from the Chinese state of Yan during the Han dynasty.[/b]
 
While Jizi story is disputed, the Wei Man dynasty is not disputed.
 
[b]Secondly, Han dynasty China conquered Gojoseon itself, deposing the Wei Man dynasty king who was already of Chinese descent, and divided Korean lands in northern Korean peninsula into the four commandaries, Lelang commandery (near modern-day Pyongyang), Xuantu (near the Yalu River), Lintun, and Zhenfan.
[/b]
 
https://ctext.org/shiji/zhao-xian-lie-zhuan
 
朝鮮列傳 
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/資治通鑑/卷021#元封三年(癸酉,公元前一零八年) 
 
[quote]左將軍已并兩軍,即急擊朝鮮。朝鮮相路人、相韓陰、尼谿相參、將軍王唊相與謀曰:「始欲降樓船,樓船今執,獨左將軍並將,戰益急,恐不能與戰;王又不肯降。」陰、唊、路人皆亡降漢,路人道死。夏,尼谿參使人殺朝鮮王右渠來降。王險城未下,故右渠之大臣成己又反,復攻吏。左將軍使右渠子長、降相路人之子最告諭其民。誅成己。以故遂定朝鮮,為樂浪、臨屯、玄菟、真番四郡。封參為澅清侯,陰為萩苴侯,唊為平州侯,長為幾侯,最以父死頗有功,為涅陽侯。
 
The General of the Left had already combined the two armies, whereupon he launched an urgent and fierce attack against Joseon. The Joseon Chancellor Luren, Chancellor Hanyin, Chancellor Can of Nixi, and General Wang Jia conspired together, saying: "Initially, we wished to surrender to the General of the Tower Ships, but the General of the Tower Ships has now been arrested. The General of the Left alone has consolidated the armies, and the fighting grows increasingly urgent; we fear we cannot withstand him in battle, yet our King refuses to surrender." Consequently, Hanyin, Wang Jia, and Luren all fled to surrender to the Han Dynasty, though Luren died along the way. In the summer, Chancellor Can of Nixi sent men to assassinate Ugeo, the King of Joseon, and subsequently came forward to surrender. However, the capital city of Wanggeom-seong had still not fallen; thus, Shengji, a high minister under the late King Ugeo, rebelled anew and repeatedly attacked the Han officials. The General of the Left dispatched King Ugeo's son, Chang, along with Zui, the son of the deceased Chancellor Luren, to proclaim a message of admonishment to the people. They subsequently executed Shengji. By these means, Joseon was finally pacified and settled, and it was divided into the four commanderies of Lelang (Naknang), Lintun (Imdun), Xuantu (Hyeondo), and Zhenfan (Jinbeon). Chancellor Can was enfeoffed as the Marquess of Huaqing; Hanyin was enfeoffed as the Marquess of Qiuju; Wang Jia was enfeoffed as the Marquess of Pingzhou; and Chang was enfeoffed as the Marquess of Ji. Zui, having demonstrated considerable merit due to his father dying in service of the cause, was enfeoffed as the Marquess of Nieyang.[/quote]
 
Goguryeo (Gaogouli) actually originated outside the Korean peninsula, in Jilin where its original capital Wandu (Hwando) was.
 
[b]Third, the Xin dynasty emperor of China Wang Mang killed the King of Goguryeo and demoted him to Marquis.
[/b]
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/漢書/卷099中 
 
[quote]初,五威將帥出,改句町王以為侯,王邯怨怒不附。莽諷牂柯大尹周歆詐殺邯。邯弟承起兵攻殺歆。先是,莽發高句驪兵,當伐胡,不欲行,郡強迫之,皆亡出塞,因犯法為寇。遼西大尹田譚追擊之,為所殺。州郡歸咎於高句驪侯騶。嚴尤奏言:「貉人犯法,不從騶起,正有它心,宜令州郡且尉安之。今猥被以大罪,恐其遂畔,夫餘之屬必有和者。匈奴未克,夫餘、穢貉復起,此大憂也。」莽不尉安,穢貉遂反,詔尤擊之。尤誘高句驪侯騶至而斬焉,傳首長安。莽大說,下書曰:「乃者,命遣猛將,共行天罰,誅滅虜知,分為十二部,或斷其右臂,或斬其左腋,或潰其胸腹,或紬其兩脅。今年刑在東方,誅貉之部先縱焉。捕斬虜騶,平定東域,虜知殄滅,在于漏刻。此乃天地群神社稷宗廟佑助之福,公卿大夫士民同心將率虓虎之力也。予甚嘉之。其更名高句驪為下句驪,布告天下,令咸知焉。」於是貉人愈犯邊,東北與西南夷皆亂云。
 
Previously, when the Five-Majesty Generals and Marshals were sent out, they demoted the King of Guding to the rank of Marquess, causing King Han of Guding to become deeply resentful and angry, refusing to submit to the new regime. Wang Mang covertly instigated Zhou Xin, the Grand Governor of Zangke, to treacherously assassinate Han, prompting Han’s younger brother, Cheng, to raise troops, attack, and kill Zhou Xin in retaliation. Prior to this, Wang Mang had mobilized troops from Goguryeo to launch a campaign against the Hu nomads, but because the soldiers did not wish to go and the local commandery forcibly compelled them, they all fled beyond the frontier, violated the laws, and turned to banditry. Tian Tan, the Grand Governor of Liaoxi, pursued and attacked them but was killed by the deserters, leading the provincial and commandery authorities to place the blame entirely on Zou, the Marquess of Goguryeo. General Yan You submitted a memorial to the throne, advising that the violations of law committed by the Mo people did not originate from Marquess Zou, and even if he harboured separate intentions, it would be best to instruct the provinces and commanderies to pacify and comfort them for now; he warned that if they were abruptly charged with a massive crime, they would completely rebel and groups like the Buyeo would surely join them, creating immense grief since the Xiongnu had not yet been conquered while Buyeo and the Weimo would be rising up again. Wang Mang refused to pacify them, and the Weimo people subsequently rose in open rebellion, prompting an imperial edict for Yan You to attack them. Yan You lured Zou, the Marquess of Goguryeo, to a meeting and decapitated him, sending his severed head back to Chang'an. Wang Mang was greatly pleased and issued an imperial decree stating that he had recently deployed fierce generals to jointly execute Heaven's punishment and annihilate the deceitful barbarians, dividing the forces into twelve armies—some to sever their right arm, some to cut away their left armpit, some to smash their chest and abdomen, and some to pierce their flanks—and since cosmic punishment resided in the east this year, the armies tasked with crushing the Mo were unleashed first. He declared that with the barbarian Zou captured and executed, the eastern regions were pacified and the total destruction of the deceitful barbarians was a matter of mere moments, a blessing granted by the protection of Heaven, Earth, the numerous spirits, the altars of state, and the ancestral temples, as well as the unified hearts of the officials, scholars, citizens, and the roaring-tiger strength of the generals. Commending this deeply, Wang Mang ordered the name of Goguryeo to be changed to Xiaguryeo and proclaimed it to the entire world so that everyone should know it. Following this insult, the Mo people raided the borders with even greater frequency, and both the northeastern and southwestern barbarians plunged into total chaos.[/quote]
 
[b]Fourth, Cao Wei dynasty of China defeated Goguryeo in 244–245 in the "Goguryeo–Wei War" and completely sacked the Goguryeo capital Hwando, slaughtering, enslaving and raping its people.
[/b]
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/三國志/卷28#毌丘儉 
 
[quote]正始中,儉以高句驪數侵叛,督諸軍步騎萬人出玄菟,從諸道討之。句驪王宮將步騎二萬人,進軍沸流水上,大戰梁口,〈梁音渴。〉宮連破走。儉遂束馬縣車,以登丸都,屠句驪所都,斬獲首虜以千數。句驪沛者名得來,數諫宮,〈臣松之按東夷傳:沛者,句驪國之官名。〉宮不從其言。得來歎曰:「立見此地將生蓬蒿。」遂不食而死,舉國賢之。儉令諸軍不壞其墓,不伐其樹,得其妻子,皆放遣之。宮單將妻子逃竄。儉引軍還。六年,复征之,宮遂奔買溝。儉遣玄菟太守王頎追之,〈《世語》曰:頎字孔碩,東萊人,晉永嘉中大賊王彌,頎之孫。〉過沃沮千有餘里,至肅慎氏南界,刻石紀功,刊丸都之山,銘不耐之城。諸所誅納八千餘口,論功受賞,侯者百餘人。穿山溉灌,民賴其利。
 
During the Zhengshi era, Sima Yi's general Guanqiu Jian, because the state of Gaoguli (Goguryeo) had repeatedly invaded and rebelled, commanded an army of ten thousand infantry and cavalry out from Xuantu to launch a punitive expedition against them from various routes. Gong, the King of Gaoguli, led twenty thousand infantry and cavalry to advance upon the Feiliu River, and a great battle ensued at Liangkou, where Gong was repeatedly defeated and forced to flee. Guanqiu Jian subsequently bound his horses and hung his chariots to ascend Wandu, whereupon he slaughtered the capital city of Gaoguli, decapitating and capturing several thousand enemies. The Paizhe (a high official title of Gaoguli) named Delai had repeatedly admonished Gong, but Gong did not follow his words; Delai lamented, saying, "I shall soon see this land covered in wild weeds and wormwood," and subsequently refused to eat until he died, for which the entire country revered him as a virtuous man. Guanqiu Jian ordered his troops not to destroy Delai's tomb nor to cut down its trees, and upon capturing Delai's wife and children, he released and sent them all away. King Gong fled into hiding accompanied only by his wife and children, and Guanqiu Jian withdrew his army. In the sixth year, Guanqiu Jian launched another campaign against them, causing Gong to flee to Maigou. Guanqiu Jian dispatched Wang Qi, the Grand Administrator of Xuantu, to pursue him; Wang Qi advanced more than a thousand li past Woju until he reached the southern border of the Sushen people, where they carved a stone monument to record their achievements, inscribed their victory upon Mount Wandu, and engraved it upon the walls of Bunai City. In total, over eight thousand captives were executed or accepted into submission, rewards were distributed based on merit, and over a hundred individuals were enfeoffed as marquesses; they also cut through mountains to build irrigation systems, from which the local population benefited greatly.[/quote]
 
[b]Fifth, the Murong Xianbei Former Yan state led by Murong Huang invaded Goguryeo and in 342 again sacked Goguryeo's capital Hwando, slaughtering looting, raping, taking 50,000 Goguryeo people as sex slaves including women of the Goguryeo royal family like the Queen mother and Queen as well as the corpse of King Micheon.
[/b]
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/晉書/卷109#慕容皝
 
[quote]咸康七年,皝遷都龍城。率勁卒四萬,入自南陝,以伐宇文、高句麗,又使翰及子垂為前鋒,遣長史王寓等勒眾萬五千,從北置而進。高句麗王釗謂皝軍之從北路也,乃遣其弟武統精銳五萬距北置,躬率弱卒以防南陝。翰與釗戰於木底,大敗之,乘勝遂入丸都,釗單馬而遁。皝掘釗父利墓,載其屍並其母妻珍寶,掠男女五萬餘口,焚其宮室,毀丸都而歸。明年,釗遣使稱臣于皝,貢其方物,乃歸其父屍。
 
In the seventh year of the Xiankang era, Murong Huang moved his capital to Longcheng and subsequently led forty thousand elite troops to invade from the southern mountain pass in order to launch a campaign against the Yuwen tribe and Gaoguli (Goguryeo); he also appointed Murong Han and his son Murong Chui as the vanguard, while dispatching Chief Secretary Wang Yu and others to command fifteen thousand troops to advance from the northern route. Zhao, the King of Gaoguli, assumed that Murong Huang’s main army would come via the northern route, so he dispatched his younger brother, Wu, to command fifty thousand elite troops to resist them at the northern position, while he personally led the weaker soldiers to defend the southern mountain pass. Murong Han engaged King Zhao in battle at Mudi and decisively defeated him, riding the momentum of victory to enter the capital of Wandu, while Zhao fled alone on horseback. Murong Huang exhumed the grave of Zhao's father, King Uri, seized his corpse along with Zhao's mother, wives, and precious treasures, plundered more than fifty thousand captives of both sexes, burned down the palace chambers, destroyed the city of Wandu, and returned home. The following year, Zhao sent an envoy to declare himself a vassal to Murong Huang and offered local tribute, whereupon Murong Huang returned his father's corpse.[/quote]
 
Han Chinese also defeated a Buyeo (Fuyu or Puyo) raid on Xuantu commandery in Korea and beheaded Buyeo soldiers.
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%99%89%E6%9B%B8/%E5%8D%B7086#%E5%BC%B5%E8%BB%8C
 
[quote]永康元年,王夫台將二萬餘人寇玄菟,玄菟太守公孫域擊破之,斬首千餘級。至靈帝熹平三年,復奉章貢獻。夫餘本屬玄菟,獻帝時,其王求屬遼東云。
 
In the first year of the Yongkang era, the Buyeo king Futai led more than twenty thousand men to raid Xuantu Commandery; Gongsun Yu, the Grand Administrator of Xuantu, attacked and decisively defeated him, decapitating over a thousand enemies. By the third year of the Xiping era during the reign of Emperor Ling, the Buyeo once again presented memorials and offered tribute. Buyeo originally belonged to Xuantu, but during the reign of Emperor Xian, its king requested to be attached to Liaodong instead.[/quote]
 
In 285 the Murong tribe of the Xianbei, led by Murong Hui, invaded the Koreans in Buyeo and mass raped and killed Koreans, forcing Koreans to flee to Okjeo and into the peninsula. Murong Hui sold Buyeo people as slaves in China. Buyeo had to beg Han Chinese in Western Jin for help in driving out the Murong Xianbei.
 
[quote]  武帝時,頻來朝貢,至太康六年,爲慕容廆所襲破,其王依慮自殺,子弟走保沃沮。帝爲下詔曰:「夫餘王世守忠孝,爲惡虜所滅,其湣念之。若其遺類足以復國者,當爲之方計,使得存立。」有司奏護東夷校尉鮮于嬰不救夫餘,失於機略。詔免嬰,以何龕代之。明年,夫餘後王依羅遣詣龕,求率見人還復舊國。仍請援。龕上列,遣督郵賈沈以兵送之。廆又要之于路,沈與戰,大敗之,廆衆退,羅得復國。爾後每爲廆掠其種人,賣於中國。帝湣之,又發詔以官物贖還,下司、冀二州,禁市夫餘之口。
 
During the reign of Emperor Wu, they frequently came to court to present tribute; however, by the sixth year of the Taikang era, they were launched upon with a surprise attack and crushed by Murong Hui, causing their king, Yilu, to commit suicide, while his sons and brothers fled to shelter in Woju. The Emperor consequently issued an imperial edict stating: "The kings of Buyeo have for generations maintained loyalty and filial piety, yet they have been destroyed by a wicked barbarian; We remember them with deep pity and compassion. If their remaining kin are sufficient to restore their state, we ought to devise plans and strategies for them so that they can preserve their standing and exist." The relevant officials submitted a memorial stating that Xianyu Ying, the Colonel Protecting the Eastern Barbarians, had failed to rescue Buyeo, failing in his tactical planning. An edict was issued dismissing Ying from office, and He Kan was appointed to replace him. The following year, Yiluo, the succeeding king of Buyeo, sent an envoy to visit He Kan, requesting to lead his remaining people back to restore their old state, and further pleading for military reinforcements. He Kan submitted a report to the throne and dispatched the Commandery Inspector Jia Shen with troops to escort them. Murong Hui again lay in wait to intercept them on the road, but Jia Shen engaged him in battle and decisively defeated him, causing Murong Hui’s forces to retreat, whereupon Yiluo was able to restore his state. After that event, Murong Hui frequently plundered their tribespeople to sell them inside China. The Emperor took pity on them, and issued another edict to ransom them back using state funds, sending orders to Si and Ji provinces to ban the trading of Buyeo captives in the marketplaces.[/quote]
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%AC%BD%E5%AE%9A%E5%8F%A4%E4%BB%8A%E5%9C%96%E6%9B%B8%E9%9B%86%E6%88%90/%E6%96%B9%E8%BC%BF%E5%BD%99%E7%B7%A8/%E9%82%8A%E8%A3%94%E5%85%B8/%E7%AC%AC032%E5%8D%B7#%E5%A4%AA%E5%BA%B7%E5%85%AD%E5%B9%B4%E6%89%B6%E9%A4%98%E7%82%BA%E6%85%95%E5%AE%B9%E5%BB%86%E6%89%80%E7%A0%B4%E8%A9%94%E5%85%8D%E8%AD%B7%E6%9D%B1%E5%A4%B7%E6%A0%A1%E5%B0%89
 
[quote]太康六年扶餘為慕容廆所破詔免護東夷校尉
按《晉書武帝本紀》,不載。按《扶餘傳》,太康六年,為慕 容廆所襲破,其王依慮自殺,子弟走保沃沮。帝為下 詔曰:「扶餘王世守忠孝,為惡虜所滅,甚愍念之。若其 遺類足以復國者,當為之方計,使得存立。」有司奏護 東夷校尉鮮于嬰不救扶餘失於機略。詔免嬰,以何 龕代之。
 
太康七年遣督郵賈沉率兵復扶餘之國。
 
按《晉書武帝本紀》,不載。按《扶餘傳》,「明年,扶餘後王 依羅遣詣龕,求率見人還復舊國,仍請援龕上列。遣 督郵賈沉以兵送之。廆又要之于路,沉與戰,大敗之。 廆眾退,羅得復國。爾後每為廆掠其種人賣于中國。 帝愍之,又發詔以官物贖還,下司冀二州,禁市扶餘 之口。」按《慕容廆載記》,「廆率眾東伐扶餘,扶餘王依 慮自」殺,廆夷其國城,驅萬餘人而歸。東夷校尉何龕 遣督護賈沉將迎,立依慮之子為王。廆遣其將孫丁 率騎邀之,沉力戰,斬丁,遂復《扶餘》之國。
 
In the sixth year of the Taikang era, Buyeo was crushed by Murong Hui; an imperial edict dismissed the Colonel Protecting the Eastern Barbarians.
 
According to the Annals of Emperor Wu in the Book of Jin, this event is not recorded. According to the Biography of Buyeo: In the sixth year of the Taikang era, [Buyeo] was launched upon with a surprise attack and crushed by Murong Hui, causing their king, Yilu, to commit suicide, while his sons and brothers fled to shelter in Woju. The Emperor consequently issued an imperial edict stating: "The kings of Buyeo have for generations maintained loyalty and filial piety, yet they have been destroyed by a wicked barbarian; We remember them with deep pity and compassion. If their remaining kin are sufficient to restore their state, we ought to devise plans and strategies for them so that they can preserve their standing and exist." The relevant officials submitted a memorial stating that Xianyu Ying, the Colonel Protecting the Eastern Barbarians, had failed to rescue Buyeo, failing in his tactical planning. An edict was issued dismissing Ying from office, and He Kan was appointed to replace him.
 
In the seventh year of the Taikang era, the Commandery Inspector Jia Shen was dispatched with troops to restore the state of Buyeo.
 
According to the Annals of Emperor Wu in the Book of Jin, this event is not recorded. According to the Biography of Buyeo: "The following year, Yiluo, the succeeding king of Buyeo, sent an envoy to visit He Kan, requesting to lead his remaining people back to restore their old state, and further pleading for military reinforcements. He Kan submitted a report to the throne and dispatched the Commandery Inspector Jia Shen with troops to escort them. Murong Hui again lay in wait to intercept them on the road, but Jia Shen engaged him in battle and decisively defeated him, causing Murong Hui’s forces to retreat, whereupon Yiluo was able to restore his state. After that event, Murong Hui frequently plundered their tribespeople to sell them inside China. The Emperor took pity on them, and issued another edict to ransom them back using state funds, sending orders to Si and Ji provinces to ban the trading of Buyeo captives in the marketplaces." According to the Chronicle of Murong Hui: "Hui led his forces eastward to launch a campaign against Buyeo, causing the Buyeo king Yilu to commit suicide; Hui then razed their state capital and walls, and drove more than ten thousand captives back with him. He Kan, the Colonel Protecting the Eastern Barbarians, dispatched the Commandery Inspector Jia Shen with troops to welcome and install the son of Yilu as the new king. Murong Hui sent his general, Sun Ding, to lead cavalry to intercept them on the road, but Jia Shen fought with all his might and decapitated Sun Ding, subsequently restoring the state of Buyeo."[/quote]
 
There is literally a Korean clan called Dokgo (Dugu) in Korea, the Namwon Dokgo clan, of paternal Xianbei ancestry and maternal Korean ancestry. Koreans talking about Xianbei rape are hilarious when they have Xianbei paternal ancestry.
 
Goguryeo only took the four commanderies from China like Lelang in 313 after China fell into internal civil war and rebellion in Western Jin, after the War of the Eight Princes between Jin princes and the rebellion of the five barbarians, when Xiongnu and Jie slaves like Shi Le revolted agianst their Han masters and joined Han peasant rebels.
 
These were all before the Sui-Tang wars against Goguryeo that Koreans love to brag about, which was fought by the Sui and Tang invading Goguryeo, not Goguryeo capturing Han land.
 
[b]Sixth, and many of the Sui and Tang forces were non Han Gokturks or southern Nanman ethnic minorities like Pang Xiaotai (庞孝泰) and his 13 sons from Guangxi, who were former Baiyue/Nanman minority rebels against the Tang, conscripted into war against Goguryeo. He was not Han and Koreans brag about killing him and his 13 sons and falsely claim he was Han.
[/b]
 
Tang dynasty sent many Turk soldiers against Goguryeo like Tiele Qibi Heli (wounded), Gokturks, Ashina Buzhen, Ashina She'er (wounded), Ashina Simo (Qilibi Khan) (wounded), Ashina Mishe, as well as Xianbei like Yuchi Gong (Yuchi Jingde) and Zhangsun Wuji. The Tang dynasty had subjugated the Gokturks in 630 and used their troops as slaves against Goguryeo as stated on the Orkheon stele where Bilge Khan said Gokturk men served the Tang in their wars and Gokturk women became slaves of Chinese.
 
[b]Seventh, the Mongols conquered all of Korea before fighting Southern Song dynasty of China, and Kublai Khan even forced Koreans to pay massive tributes of Korean women and Kublai Khan personally gave Korean women to Southern Song Han Chinese (Manzi) soldiers who defected from the Southern Song at Xiangyang to the Yuan dynasty, as recorded in Korean history Goryeosa. Kublai Khan also married Korean tribute women off to foreign Central Asian and Omani Arab Muslim men like Sayyid Abu Ali when they moved to Dadu (Beijing, Khanbaliq). Kublai Khan also married off one of his daughters to the Southern Song emperor Gong, aka Zhao Xian, since that was standard Mongol policy. Han general Shi Tianze who worked for the Mongols had a Korean wife and two Jurchens wives like his father Shi Bingzhi did. His son Shi Gang married a Turco-Mongol Kerait woman. Another son of his married a daughter of a Mongol official, Menggu Baer[/b]
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7fcFEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA52
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/高麗史/卷二十七#十五年
 
[quote]三月丙戌,元遣經略司王緫管來,命發軍五千,助征日本,時全羅州道,造船役徒三萬五百餘名,洪茶丘所領監造軍,供給不足,輸東京、晋州道內癸酉,年祿轉與之。王患徭役之煩,轉輸之弊,有防農務,遣上將軍李汾禧,往說茶丘,請令分半歸農,茶丘頗然之,每一[17]船,留雙丁五十人,其餘單丁,悉放歸農。壬寅,元遣蠻子媒聘使肖郁來,中書省牒云:「南宋襄陽府生券軍人,求娶妻室,故差委宣使肖郁,押官絹一千六百四十段[12],前去下高麗國,令有司差官,一同求娶施行。」肖郁令選無夫婦女一百四十名,督之甚急,於是,置結昏都監,自是至秋,窮搜閭井獨女、逆賊之妻、僧人之女,僅盈其數,怨咨大興。例給一女資粧絹十二匹,分與蠻子,蠻子卽率北還。哭聲震天,觀者莫不悽唏。丙午,幸王輪[18]寺。
 
In the third month, on the day of Bingxu, the Yuan Dynasty dispatched Manager Wang of the Pacification Office with an imperial decree ordering the mobilization of 5,000 troops to assist in the conquest of Japan; at that time, over 30,500 forced laborers in Jeolla Province were conscripted for shipbuilding, but because the supervisory army under Hong Dagu suffered from inadequate supplies, the grain and annual stipends collected from the previous Guiyou year within the regions of Donggyeong and Jinju Province were transferred to them instead. Distressed by the heavy burdens of forced corvée labor and the hardships of transporting provisions, which were severely disrupting agricultural activities, the King sent Senior General Yi Bun-hui to persuade Hong Dagu to allow half of the laborers to return to their farms, a proposal Hong Dagu agreed to, resulting in fifty shuangding—men from multi-male households—being retained for each ship while all remaining danding—sole providers—were released to return to farming. On the day of Renyin, the Yuan Dynasty sent Xiao Yu, a matchmaking envoy for the Manzi subjects, bearing an official dispatch from the Secretariat stating that the newly surrendered soldiers of Xiangyang Prefecture from the former Southern Song Dynasty were seeking wives, and thus Envoy Xiao Yu was commissioned to escort 1,640 bolts of official silk to the Kingdom of Goryeo with orders for the relevant authorities to assign officials to jointly execute the acquisition of these brides. Xiao Yu demanded the selection of 140 unmarried women and widows under extreme urgency, prompting the establishment of the Directorate of Marriage, which thoroughly scoured the neighborhoods from then until autumn to hunt down only-daughters, the wives of rebels, and the daughters of Buddhist monks, barely filling the required quota amidst immense public resentment and bitter lamentation. Each woman was provided with a standard dowry of twelve bolts of silk and distributed to the Manzi soldiers, who immediately led them away to return north as the sound of their weeping shook the heavens and left no onlooker without tears of profound grief; following these events, on the day of Bingwu, the King made a royal visit to Wangryunsa Temple.[/quote]
 
https://thetributewomen.wordpress.com/
 
https://web.archive.org/web/20160804091847/https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/knowledge-bank/inscription-memory-sayyid-bin-abu-ali
https://web.archive.org/web/20210512210351/https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/sites/default/files/knowledge-bank-article/an%20inscription%20in%20memory%20of%20sayyid%20bin%20abu%20ali.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20191117211948/https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/content/did-you-know-sayyid-bin-abu-ali-true-representative-intercultural-relations-along-maritime
 
https://www.ibadica.org/s/bibliographie/item/38445 
https://ftp.berghahnbooks.com/title/ElisseeffSilk/loc 
https://pieterderideaux.jimdofree.com/6-contents-1301-1400/liu-minzhong-1318/
 
There was literally a Korean song in Goryeo about a Huihui Muslim from Central Asia or Arabia sexually harassing and groping a Korean woman in a bakery, and the Korean woman enjoys it. The Daroreugeodireo are nonsense lyrics indicating sexual innuendo.
 
https://www.seelotus.com/gojeon/gojeon/korea-gayo/ssang-hwa-jeom.htm
https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/글로벌_세계_대백과사전/언어I·한국문학·논술/고려-조선의_문학/고려시대_문학/고려_후기#쌍화점(雙花店) 
https://ko.wikisource.org/wiki/쌍화점
 
[quote]雙花店(솽화뎜)[3]에 雙花(솽화) 사라 가고신ᄃᆡᆫ
回回(휘휘)[4]아비 내 손모글 주여이다[5]
이 말ᄉᆞᆷ미 이 店(뎜) 밧긔 나명 들명
다로러거디러 죠고맛감 삿기[6] 광대 네 마리라 호리라
더러둥셩 다리러디러 다리러디러 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 자리예 나도 자라 가리라[7]
위 위 다로러거디러 다로러
그 잔 ᄃᆡ가티 더ᇝ거츠니[8] 업다
 
三藏寺(삼장ᄉᆞ)애 블 혀라 가고신ᄃᆡᆫ
그 뎔 社主(샤쥬)ㅣ 내 손모글 주여이다
이 말ᄉᆞ미 이 뎔 밧긔 나명 들명
다로러거디러 죠고맛간 삿기上座(샹좌)[9]ㅣ 네 마리라 호리라
더러둥셩 다리러디러 다리러디러 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 자리예 나도 자라 가리라
위 위 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 잔 ᄃᆡᄀᆞ티 더ᇝ거츠니 업다
 
드레 우므레[10] 므를 길라 가고신ᄃᆡᆫ
우믓 龍(룡)이 내 손모글 주여이다
이 말ᄉᆞ미 이 우물 밧ᄭᅴ 나명 들명
다로러거디러 죠고맛간 드레바가 네 마리라 호리라
더러둥셩 다리러디러 다리러디러 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 자리예 나도 자라 가리라
위 위 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 잔 ᄃᆡᄀᆞ티 더ᇝ거츠니 업다
 
숨 ᄑᆞᆯ 지븨 수를 사라 가고신ᄃᆡᆫ
그 짓 아비 내 손모글 주여이다
이 말ᄉᆞ미 이 집 밧ᄭᅴ 나명 들명
다로러거디러 죠고맛간 싀구바가[11] 네 마리라 호리라
더러둥셩 다리러디러 다리러디러 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 자리예 나도 자라 가리라
위 위 다로러거디러 다로러
긔 잔 ᄃᆡᄀᆞ티 더ᇝ거츠니 업다
 
Middle Korean text for the Goryeo gayo (Goryeo song) Ssanghwajeom (雙花店/쌍화점), a 13th–14th century work
 
When I went to the dumpling shop to buy some dumplings, the Huihui (Muslim Central Asian/Persian/Arab) shopkeeper grabbed me by my wrist, and if this rumor should spread outside of this shop, Daroreugeodireo, I will say it was you, little clown puppet, who spread the words, Deoreodungsyeong darireodireo darireodireo daroreugeodireo darore, to that very place, I, too, shall go to sleep, Wi wi daroreugeodireo darore, ah, there is no place as cluttered and cozy as where we slept.
 
When I went to Samjangsa Temple to light the ceremonial lanterns, the head monk of that temple grabbed me by my wrist, and if this rumor should spread outside of this temple, Daroreugeodireo, I will say it was you, little novice monk, who spread the words, Deoreodungsyeong darireodireo darireodireo daroreugeodireo darore, to that very place, I, too, shall go to sleep, Wi wi daroreugeodireo darore, ah, there is no place as cluttered and cozy as where we slept.
 
When I went to the well out in the yard to draw some water, the dragon living in the well grabbed me by my wrist, and if this rumor should spread outside of this well, Daroreugeodireo, I will say it was you, little water bucket, who spread the words, Deoreodungsyeong darireodireo darireodireo daroreugeodireo darore, to that very place, I, too, shall go to sleep, Wi wi daroreugeodireo darore, ah, there is no place as cluttered and cozy as where we slept.
 
When I went to the tavern to buy some wine, the master of that tavern grabbed me by my wrist, and if this rumor should spread outside of this wine house, Daroreugeodireo, I will say it was you, little wine dipper, who spread the words, Deoreodungsyeong darireodireo darireodireo daroreugeodireo darore, to that very place, I, too, shall go to sleep, Wi wi daroreugeodireo darore, ah, there is no place as cluttered and cozy as where we slept.
[/quote]
 
Poor Mongols sold their own daughters as slaves to Han during the Yuan dynasty, while Mongol men, Han men and Semu men all had Korean concubines from Goryeo tribute women.
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qyJXEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA470
 
Korea has multiple clans of paternal Han, Hui and Jurchen origin from those foreign men marrying Korean women
Deoksu Jang clan, Imcheon Lee clan, Gyeongju Sol clan and Sanggok Ma clan all descend from Hui-hui (Hoe-hoe) men marrying Korean women, both Muslim and non-Muslim Hui. Jang Samga (Jang Sunnyong) was a Central Asian Hui who moved into Korea and married a Korean woman. Later on his mixed blood descendants married into the Korean Yi royal family of Joseon.
 
Cheonghae Lee clan was founded by a Jurchen man marrying a Korean woman.
 
Gwangdong Jin clan, Yeonan Myeong clan, Yeongsan Shin clan Yangsan Jin clan, Yeoyang Jin clan, Gwangdong Jin clan are all of paternal Han Chinese descent from Han men marrying Korean women. Yeonan Myeong clan descend from Ming Sheng of Ming Xia state whose family came from Hubei and ruled Sichuan. Yangsan Jin descend from Chen Li, son of Chen Youliang of Chen Han in Hubei.
 
Yeoyang Jin clan was founded by a Han Chinese man Jin Chong-hu who helped the Korean Goryeo King kill Korean rebels led by Yi Cha-gyŏm and was awarded with a Korean wife and land.
 
The "Korean" Wang royal family of Goryeo itself claimed paternal descent from Tang dynasty emperors like Suzong who impregnated a Korean woman from the Sinchon Gang clan, and Sinchon Gang clan itself claimed paternal descent from the Chinese Zhou dynasty King Wen via his grandson Gang Hu (Kang Hou), when his 14th generation descendant Gang Ji-yeon moved to Korea and married a Korea woman and founded the clan. Gang Hogyeong was a 67th generation descendant of Gang Hu and his son Gang Chung had a son named Gang Po-yuk who had a daughter named Chin-ŭi who had sex with a Chinese Tang dynasty imperial family member (named as Emperor Suzong of Tang) and she bore a son named Chakchegŏn 
 
[b]Eighth, the Jurchens, Manchus of Later Jin and the Qing invaded Korea twice in 1627 and 1636, including Manchu bannermen, Mongol bannermen and Han bannermen, and they committed massive slaughter and rape and enslavement against Koreans especially in 1636. Korean child slaves begged the Korean King Injo to save them as he had to meet the Qing Manchu officials but he could do nothing.
[/b]
 
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%9C%9D%E9%AE%AE%E7%8E%8B%E6%9C%9D%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E4%BB%81%E7%A5%96%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%94%E5%B9%B4#1%E6%9C%8830%E6%97%A5
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%9C%9D%E9%AE%AE%E7%8E%8B%E6%9C%9D%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E4%BB%81%E7%A5%96%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%94%E5%B9%B4#%E9%96%8F4%E6%9C%8828%E6%97%A5
https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E6%9C%9D%E9%AE%AE%E7%8E%8B%E6%9C%9D%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E4%BB%81%E7%A5%96%E5%AF%A6%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%94%E5%B9%B4#2%E6%9C%8819%E6%97%A5
 
And the Japanese themselves in the Imjin war also raped and kill 1 million Koreans in 1592-1598, taking Korean sex slaves and even selling Korean women to Portuguese merchants. Ming Chinese soldiers who fought Japan inside Korea in the Imjin war also married Korean women.
 
https://sjks.snu.ac.kr/issue/download.jsp?id=734&aid=62&ek=e995f98d56967d946471af29d7bf99f1
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=l8HT-sIrVB0C&pg=PA52
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kVy2BQAAQBAJ&pg=PT539
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kVy2BQAAQBAJ&pg=PT524
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=p3yW5MdzKnUC&pg=PA114
 
https://www.jstor.org/content/oa_book_monograph/j.ctv17bt3jv
https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv17bt3jv.8
 
These are from Korean books themselves like Samguk Sagi, Goryeosa, and Veritable Records of Joseon.
 
Japanese men also repeatedly insulted Koreans post war, Japanese businessmen used to go to South Korea for sex tourism with Korean women in the 1970s since Park Chunghee encouraged hundreds of thousands of Korean women to enter prostitution trade for foreign investment.
 
https://taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781351185271-6/corporate-kisaeng-prostitution-tourism-caroline-norma
https://jstor.org/stable/43923277
https://newint.org/features/1993/07/05/sex
https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1215/s12280-008-9054-5
 
Even if the quote was made by Tojo, its completely inaccurate since Goguryeo never ruled Han Chinese populations or lands, and Jurchen Toi pirates themselves raided Japan in 1019, raping Japanese girls and taking Japanese girls as sex slaves.
 
[quote=Tanzania post_id=2626782 time=1780573623 user_id=36950]
Hello everyone,
 
Personally, I appreciate it when someone engages with a topic as intensively as has been done in this thread.
 
This is an interesting thread, featuring highly conflicting accounts and arguments. Most readers likely find themselves in the same boat as I do, given that the timeline and locations within this "[b]Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945)[/b]" are difficult to follow. In this regard, I was only able to rely on Wikipedia for a superficial overview. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War
 
Even though we are all aware of Wikipedia’s strengths and weaknesses, this source of information—at least for me—provides a useful initial overview. I watched the aforementioned film, “[b]The 800 Heroes[/b]“ ; -  in my view, it is far from being a neutral portrayal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/800_Heroes_(film)
 
As for the "short-cut" version on YouTube—to label that a documentary strikes me as completely exaggerated, much like almost all content on YouTube, for that matter. “[b]Sihang Warehouse 1937 - Chinese Thermopylae - WW2 DOCUMENTARY[/b]“ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxpG19OTmns
 
 
Limited,
 
Naturally, I am not aware of any neutral and objective sources on this subject; however, I consider your arguments to be overly one-sided and biased. To rely almost exclusively on Chinese, US, or British sources—wartime news paper reports from 1941–1945—is, in my view, on the exact same level as: [quote=limited post_id=2625940 time=1779943512 user_id=116835] . . . [b]This would be like Hitler claiming he withdrew from Stalingrad voluntarily after just staying there to try to defeat the Soviet attempt to retake the city[/b]. . .[/quote]
 
 
Regards Holger
[/quote]
 
 
pro-Japanese pretending to be humanitarians are falsely claiming that Chinese blew up the dikes on unaware people. The contemporaneous western media reports from before the final dykes blew up show everyone knew who was blowing the dykes up and for what purpose before the flood happened.
 
None of them show Chinese troops suddenly opening up dikes on unaware peasants.
 
Also, pro-Japanese claim Japan never had any plans to advance into Ningxia and Gansu and Qinghai (when contemporaneous western media reports show that they already had plans for the Huihuiguo puppet state in those provinces, in 1938.
 
This is why contemporaneous media reports are valuable in case people try to revise history and claim this thing was never reported on that date or so on.
 
 
Also another lie pro-Japanese propagandists do, is try to conflate Chinese majority Singapore, with Indonesia, and claiming Japan had the same policy in both, and they lie that Japan only killed Chinese in Southeast Asia and spared natives, which is wrong, the majority of dead and rape victims in Southeast Asia were native Southeast Asians.
 
There were 1.2 million to 1.5 million Chinese in Dutch East Indies in total. Japan killed 4 million Indonesians (vast majority of them were Javanese Muslims, Sundanese Muslims, Balinese Hindus). Most Indonesian comfort women were Javanese Muslims, Sundanese Muslims and Balinese Hindus, at least 80% of them, the Japanese sent Javanese comfort girls to other islands.
 
https://verzetsmuseum.org/en/kennisbank/the-pre-war-dutch-east-indies
 
https://indischekamparchieven.nl/en/occupation-and-bersiap
 
https://journals.openedition.org/remi/23184
 
Chinese were the majority in Singapore and parts of British Malaya (some even say Chinese were plurality in British Malaya and Malays were a minority along with Malaysian Indians).
 
Chinese in Singapore and Malaya were NOT disproportionately targeted compared to their population ratio  and role in resistance. Chinese in British Malaya dominated and led the Malayan Communist party under Chin Peng. The Malayan Communist party violently resisted the Japanese.
 
while in Indonesia, the Indonesian Communist party was led and dominated by mostly Javanese Muslims and Balinese Hindus, most Indonesian communists weren't Chinese Indonesians, and most Chinese Indonesians were not communist.
 
Chinese made up most of the dead in Singapore during Sook Ching massacre, because Chinese were, and are the majority in Singapore. No shit the majority would make up most casualties. Chinese weren't a small peaceful minority in Singapore or Malaya that was singled out by Japanese for cruelty, they were literally the majority and the most violent fighters against the Japanese.
 
Japan never carried out Sook Ching style massacres against Chinese Indonesians in Java. There was no mass executions or massacres of Chinese in Java under Japanese occupation, only a few political activists were arrested and interned.
 
Chinese Indonesians in Java were even exempted from forced labour, while Japanese starved and worked millions of Indonesian Javanese Muslim men to death in addition to raping Javanese girls. Japanese even stopped the Dutch and local Indonesians from looting and destroying Chinese owned sugar mills and warned them to stop attacking Chinese in Java or they would face punishment.
 
This was because Japan desperately need the cooperation of Chinese industrialists of Java to manage the economy of the Dutch East Indies, and Chinese did not make up the Indonesian communist party. 
 
Japanese also beheaded the 12 Malay and Arab Hadrami Sultans of western Borneo (Kalimantan) in Indonesia, and used forced Malay and Javanese Romusha labour along with Javanese comfort women in British Borneo in Sabah and massacred local Suluk Muslims in Sabah after the Jesselton revolt in 1943.
 
In British Malaya, Japanese didn't spare Malay Muslims from rape, they raped Malay Muslim girls and Malaysian Tamil Indian girls and used Malaysian Tamil Indians as forced labour on the Siam-Burma death railway, killing between 100,000-200,000 of them.
 
Also like in Java in Indonesia, Chinese in Vietnam didn't suffer massacres by Japan. Most of the 2 million starvation victims of Japan in Vietnam were Kinh Vietnamese in north Vietnam, and also Japan raped and massacred Kinh Vietnamese in 1944-1945 when taking control from Vichy French authorities.
 
In Philippines, Japan's rape and massacre victims were majority native Filipinos and even Germans, Italians and Spanish (Fellow fascists) in the Manila massacre.
 
There wasn't any anti-Chinese massacre in Java, Indonesia or in Vietnam or Philippines under Japanese occupation. Only in Singapore and parts of Malaya in 1942, and that was because Chinese were majority in those parts and made up most of the Malayan communist party fighters.
 
And Japanese still raped Malay Muslim and Malaysian Indian women and girls and used them as forced labour despite there being no resistance from them.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1780372644 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2626521#p2626521
 
1938 Chinese postcard?
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/156316804403
 
Chinese refugees
https://www.ebay.com/itm/206224505889
https://www.ebay.com/itm/306956060236
 
Japanese propaganda republished in Horrors of War
 
December 1937 bombing of Chinese ships retreating on the Yangtze from Nanjing
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/353291782906
 
Japanese propaganda on 27 January 1938 about landing at Lienyunkang (Lianyungang) harbour at he terminus of the Lunghai (Lunghai) railway and attacking Chinese pillboxes.
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/145608508425
 
Japanese propaganda falsely claiming on 2 March 1938 that they defeated 8,000 Communists in a surprise attack at Paotch in Shanxi and forced them to retreat across the Yellow River into Shaanxi and killed 500.
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/389780082005
https://www.ebay.com/itm/306955621652
https://www.ebay.com/itm/198178387224
 
Japanese propaganda falsely claiming Chinese bombed civilians in Shanghai in 1938
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/135293269920
 
 
Japanese propaganda claiming Chinese "terrorists" attacking them in Nanjing
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/286511453487
 
Japanese propaganda falsely claiming Chinese planes killed civilians in Taiwan in 1938.
 
https://www.ebay.com/itm/265575902851
https://www.ebay.com/itm/358555423250
 
87
 
Chinese Bombers Raid Japanese Territory
 
Forty Chinese bombers made their first attack on Japanese territory on February 23, 1938 inflicting many casualties on the unsuspecting civilian population of Formosa. The raiders struck at the air-base on the outskirts of Taihoku, capital of Formosa, at 11 a. m., dropping bombs. They flew so high that anti-aircraft batteries on the island were unable to reach them, but consequently the bombs landed far afield, hitting private homes and causing tragic casualties among women and children. An hour later the raiders at-tacked Shinchiku City. Ten bombs were dropped on Chikuto, nearby, and several civilians were killed. The raiders returned unscathed. Formosa lies approximately 120 miles east of the southeastern coast of China. It was ceded to Japan by China in 1895 as a result of the Chinese-Japanese war of 1894-95.
 
To know the HORRORS OF WAR is to want PEACE
 
This is one of a series of 240 True Stories of Modern Warfare. Save to get them all. Copyright 1938, GUM, INC., Phila., Pa.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1780182921 user_id=116835]
Rodney James Szasz 
 
https://shatteredjewels.wordpress.com/about-the-author/
 
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/rodszasz
 
https://ised-isde.canada.ca/cipo/trademark-search/1633614
 
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/JLCKpuzbz_YBYhkR8W6Lpo4utBk/appointments
 
https://patents.google.com/patent/JPH0446765Y2/11
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/accvi/posts/2140373402674335/
 
https://patents.justia.com/patents-by-us-classification/D23/214?page=3
 
https://graduation.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/11/congreg_1986_spring_2.pdf
 
https://ladysmithchronicle.com/2022/10/06/james-szasz/
 
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/rodszasz
 
https://thebcreview.ca/2022/07/02/1512-szasz-ogilvie-bomber-command/
 
https://www.facebook.com/rod.szasz/
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1780096968 user_id=116835]
https://www.nytimes.com/1943/11/07/archives/our-distorted-view-of-china-a-far-eastern-expert-points-to-a.html
 
https://remnantoflives.fandom.com/zh/wiki/%E5%9B%BD%E6%B0%91%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD%E5%86%9B%E7%AC%AC%E5%85%AB%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80%E5%86%9B
 
https://www.fredautley.com/pdffiles/book19.pdf
 
https://www.cbi-theater.com/LIFE-Red-China/red-china.html
 
https://time.com/archive/6897936/all-we-had-to-tell-all-we-had-to-tell/
 
https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,949845-3,00.html
 
https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/26497/what-was-the-nature-of-the-japanese-cabinet-crisis-after-the-battle-of-taierzhua
 
https://time.com/archive/6879126/special-section-in-search-of-history/
 
https://www.nps.gov/articles/oss-in-action-the-pacific-and-the-far-east.htm
 
https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/The-Dixie-Mission-1944.pdf
 
https://www.bevinalexander.com/china/27-dixie-mission.htm
 
Japanese propaganda 
https://info-rekininken.tokyo/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/b7d071ed8f3b179884a1da32233459be.pdf
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1779408233 user_id=116835]
Refutation of Rudolph Joseph Rummel and all his lies on China's WW2 death toll
 
 
Rudolph Joseph Rummel is often cited by Japanese apologists for falsely claiming China killed more of its own people in the Yellow river flood or forced conscription. 
 
He was openly biased and used biased language in his book like "The Depraved Nationalist Regime"
 
Rummel, who people cited here (https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP3.HTM and), was ridiculed by Edward J. M. Rhoads for his ridiculous estimate of deaths in the Xinhai revolution, Rummel claimed only 2,000 dead (while Manchu banner deaths alone ranged from 15,000 dead Manchus at Xi'an, to 500 dead Manchus at Wuchang, and the entire Zhenjiang, Nanjing and Taiyuan Manchu garrisons were killed).
 
From Edward Rhoad's book on pages 228 where he mocks Rummel's claim and 366 where he cited Rummel's source that he made fun of.
 
[quote]Brief as it was , the revolution was hardly bloodless ; it was far from a " very minor affair " in which ( according to a recent study ) " no more than 1,000 to 2,000 died . " 151 The casualties among the banner people at Xi'an alone were sev-eral times that. A disproportionate number of the people killed and wounded during the revolution were Manchus,[/quote]
 
[quote]Rummel, R. J. China's Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder since 1900. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 1991.[/quote]
 
[attachment=1]228.png[/attachment]
 
[attachment=0]366.png[/attachment]
 
Sara M. Butler mocked Rummel for making of a fake number of Jews dead in the Spanish Inquisition.
 
https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/historical-reflections/44/1/hrrh440105.xml?rskey=BUOYhA&result=80&print
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA557578631&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03157997&p=AONE&sw=w
https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/historical-reflections/44/1/hrrh440105.xml?rskey=1PTUBA&result=74&print&print
https://dokumen.pub/on-violence-in-history-9781789204667.html
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kkC9DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA31
 
https://dokumen.pub/the-darker-angels-of-our-nature-refuting-the-pinker-theory-of-history-amp-violence-9781350140608-9781350140592-9781350148437-9781350140622.html
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=F241EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA128
 
[quote]Political scientist Rudolf J. Rummel's Death by Government coins the term " democide " to describe the murderous activity of state systems . Each chapter heading takes its name from the death toll tied to a specific government (for exam- ple, “61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State”; “10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime”).10 His numbers are also inflated: Rummel claims that 350,000 Jews were killed in the Spanish Inquisition, which is 1.7 times higher than the actual Jewish population of Spain at that time.11
 
Butler, Sara M. "Getting Medieval on Steven Pinker: Violence and Medieval England." Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques, vol. 44, no. 1, spring 2018, pp. 29+. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A557578631/AONE?u=anon~6209ef87&sid=googleScholar&xid=04b4a511. Accessed 21 May 2026.[/quote]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=f2wHSEud6voC&pg=PA148#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
Not a single other historian says only 1,000 to 2,000 died in the Xinhai revolution.
 
Crossley estimates 20,000 dead at Xi'an in 1911, other people give estimates from 10,000, to 15,000, and that's just for Manchu dead in Xi'an.
 
Rhoads motive here could be that he has an open agenda against Han, and wants to cover up death tolls suffered by everyone else like Manchus, who got slaughtered not only in Xinhai but also made up most of the dead in the Boxer rebellion in 1900 as well, which Rhoads doesn't want to dwell on.
 
 
 
Rhoads is also the only source for these claims about China killing millions via conscription.
 
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/CHINA.CHAP1.HTM
 
[quote]Then there was the process of conscription. This was a deadly affair in which men were kidnapped for the army, rounded up indiscriminately by press-gangs or army units among those on the roads or in the towns and villages, or otherwise gathered together. Many men, some the very young and old, were killed resisting or trying to escape. Once collected, they would be roped or chained together and marched, with little food or water, long distances to camp. They often died or were killed along the way, sometimes less than 50 percent reaching camp alive. Then recruit camp was no better, with hospitals resembling Nazi concentration camps like Buchenwald.3 Probably 3,081,000 died during the Sino-Japanese War; likely another 1,131,000 during the Civil War--4,212,000 dead in total. Just during conscription.[/quote]
 
Hans J. van de Ven, who is biased against China and not pro-China at all, refuted Rummel's claims about conscription massacres and deaths in this article here.
 
http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/2866/1/74.pdf.pdf
 
[quote]256 Wartime mobilisation
 
down by county and passed on to local authorities, were first to be filled from local forces.12 Where no Conscription Commands existed, hence in the majority of places, mercenary recruitment was permitted. Before carrying out such recruitment, however, army units were to report the number of recruits they needed to the Ministry. The Ministry then allocated quotas to Special Administrators and county governments. Army units were to send Escort Teams with the necessary provisions of food, bedding, uniforms, and travel money to their assigned counties. Impressment was strictly proscribed.13
 
The Nationalists abandoned the pre-war policy of recruiting equitably from across the country. That was bureaucratically beyond their capabilities. As Table 7.1 shows, recruitment was concentrated in provinces such as Henan, Hunan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Shaanxi, and Sichuan. Until 1941, Henan was the most important Nationalist recruitment ground. Although then overtaken by Sichuan, the province remained important for Nationalist recruitment until 1943, when first a disastrous famine, surely connected to years of recruitment and warfare, and then Japanese occupation made further Nationalist recruitment difficult. If Henan was well known as an area that produced many bandits and soldiers, the same was true for Hunan, where Zeng Guofan had recruited the Hunan Army to fight the Taiping. After Sichuan and Henan, Hunan was the third most important recruitment area. The rapid decline of Guangxi to Nationalist recruitment was perhaps the result of reticence by the Guangxi Clique about their recruitment. It may also have been the case that recruitment became difficult in this province with a relatively small population. Guangdong and Anhui took up some, but by no means all, of the slack after 1941. Table 7.1 further makes clear that Shaanxi province, most populous in the south, was an important recruitment ground for the Nationalists. After 1943, it was one of the three or four most significant provinces for Nationalists recruitment. Nationalist forces in north and north-west China likely depended on this area to replenish their forces.
 
Provincial reports suggest that after the initial wave of unrest recruitment became a difficult and unpopular but nonetheless a broadly accepted reality. Besides permitting mercenary recruitment and concentrating recruitment in areas where the population had traditionally proved willing to take up the life of arms, the abandonment of an attempt to recruit by lottery, financial support for recruitment and for army families, and other local measures eased the stresses created by recruitment. Recruitment would never be a clean or fair process, and malpractices, abuses, and resistance were common. But the Nationalists were nonetheless able to staff their armies and calm social unrest.
 
Dai Gaoxiang was Chief-of-Staff and then the head of the Sichuan Conscription Command until 1942. He wrote in an overview Sichuan’s recruitment history that after initial difficulties, recruitment took place without many problems until 1941.14 In Sichuan, as in other provinces, the introduction of a lottery proved unpopular. If in the past, the recruiters of warlord armies came around occasionally to seize the village poor, leaving them undisturbed at other times, the lottery gave rise to a constant anxiety because suddenly every zhuangding became liable to military service. The lottery, moreover, was disliked precisely because it was blind to local conditions. According to Dai, once the lottery was abandoned, army recruitment ceased to be a major source of rural unrest.
 
Wartime mobilisation 257
 
Dai stated that the real criterion followed in recruitment was to leave no family without enough labour to support itself.
 
A report on Hunan, which began by stating that ‘bribery and the purchase of substitutes do occur, although we are no worse than other provinces’, 15 argued that recruitment had exceeded provincial quota in 1939 and 1940 by 50 and 25 per cent, respectively.16 The report suggested that responsible for this success were in part central grants to support recruitment in Hunan, but also local efforts to organise aid to families with sons in the army. For recruitment, Hunan received 288,000 yuan per month for management expenses. In addition, it was allocated 1 yuan per month for each recruit. That money was divided in the following way. The county government, the district office, and the bao office each received 10 cents per recruit. From this, office expenditures and costs involved in accommodating new recruits when they were called up were to be paid. Each conscript received on average 30 cents per day for subsistence, with the actual amount depending on travel distance, and 10 cents to purchase straw sandals.17 Counties had organised War Family Support Committees, in which local elites participated. These committees provided towels, toothpaste, and soap to conscripts – perhaps best seen as luxury gifts – and organised send-off meetings, and at New Year provided salt and pork to army families. According to this report, the Committees had also collected grain and money, amounting on average to 140,000 yuan per county and 20,000 kilos of rice, from which grants were made to poor army families.18
 
A 1941 report on Jiangxi too stated that it had been able to exceed recruitment quotas by significant amounts. In Jiangxi, army families were given, in addition to a Conscription Stipend, 10 yuan as a Family Support Stipend as well as 300 kilos of rice.19 A Zhejiang report similarly argued that immediately after the outbreak of fighting, army recruitment had caused incidents, but that subsequently things had settled down. Zhejiang too had decided not to implement the lottery. It had organised Military Service Propaganda Units, made up of representatives from the government, the KMT, school teachers, and local public organisations, which had travelled through the countryside. Army Family Support Committees had also been established in Zhejiang, which provided 30–50 yuan to army families, who were also excused of certain surtaxes and labour duties, while the government provided them with support for burial expenditures. Children were entitled to free education, although few probably took up the offer.20
 
The Nationalists sought to keep service in the army attractive. At the beginning of the war, army pay had been cut by 20 per cent in order to limit expenditures. In 1939, a Senior Class soldier received 8.5 yuan per month while a Second Class Soldier received 7 yuan. Chen Cheng argued at an MAC Senior Staff Meeting in 1939 that inflation ‘makes it difficult for a soldier to afford food expenditures, let alone anything else. Furthermore, it is now impossible for troops that have been called up to assist their families’. 21 That of course had been a major attraction for many poor families to send their sons to the army. Chen secured pay increases for the lowest ranks by more than 40 per cent and for the lowest level officers by 30 per cent.
 
A system, endorsed by the NPC and sanctioned as an example of ‘the rich contribute money and the poor contribute labour’, allowed the wealthy to purchase ‘temporary relief from military service’. Upon introduction, rates were set high, from 200 to more than 1,000 yuan depending on wealth.22 Revenues were to be used to support army families
 
258 Wartime mobilisation
 
and improve local government. In Zhejiang, one county collected 400,000 yuan. This particular report lambasted famous Shaoxing with its 1.2 million residents for only having raised 50,000 yuan. 23
 
In February 1939, the government adopted regulations that made service in the baojia more attractive. Baojia staff were exempted from labour duties and military service as long as they held office. Expenses related to their posts were paid from the county budget, their taxes were reduced, and their children, including daughters, were entitled to free primary school education.24 In addition, they were given merit rewards, insignia, banners, and plaques – the usual device by which Chinese states sought to increase the status of its local agents.
 
As provincial reports indicate, abuses certainly existed in recruitment and it was never free from exploitation for personal profit or abuse by local officials. Nonetheless, what is interesting in the Nationalists’ approach is the return to traditional methods. Conscription on the basis of universal military service and a draft conducted by means of a blind lottery proved unworkable. Instead, the Nationalists focused recruitment in areas well known for readily producing men with military skills, used bureaucratic means to keep control over recruitment, and used local officials to mobilise local elites to support and finance the cost of recruitment. All this makes clear that there was more to Nationalists recruitment than impressment. There was no way that the Nationalists could have recruited 2 million men annually before 1941, and more than 1.5 million afterwards, by force alone. It stands to reason that if the Taiping, Zeng Guofan, and the warlords could amass large numbers of forces, the Nationalists could do so as well at least for a number years. During the first two phases of the war, the greater difficulty was less recruitment itself than retaining control over it. Like the Taiping, Zeng Guofan, the Qing, and the warlords, the Nationalists would face the problem of how to keep these forces from degenerating in quality, from becoming abusive, from becoming tools in the hands of those opposed to their rule, and from spawning informal but abusive fiscal institutions.
 
It should be mentioned as well that war zones were located in or near areas with surpluses of food and men. The limited logistical capabilities of the Nationalists made it inevitable that troops were stationed where they could most easily be sustained. It is also clear that the campaigns of the second phase of the War of Resistance were shaped by this reality. Operations were limited by the ability of Nationalist forces to move away from the areas on which they depended and the hardest fighting took place to protect these areas without which Nationalist resistance would become impossible.
[/quote]
 
https://escholarship.org/content/qt2j08g4sk/qt2j08g4sk.pdf 
 
Even anti-China redditors commented negatively on Rummel's claims.
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/10mio9w/during_the_second_sino_japanese_war_was_the/
 
[quote]ScipioAsina
The often brutal and dysfunctional nature of Nationalist China's wartime conscription practices is well-documented, but it did not reflect official policy, and what Rummel describes represent the worst case scenarios (I've read accounts by Nationalist veterans who attest to better experiences).
 
The problems with conscription largely stemmed from a combination of corruption, the weakness of the Nationalist's authority at local levels, and the inherent flaws of the conscription system. In theory, the government would set an annual enlistment quota, which required each baojia (a group of households that traditionally had mutual security responsibilities) to contribute a certain number of men. Local officials (generally at the county and village levels) and recruitment officers would then call them up using a lottery. Individuals unfit for duty or already employed in public service or essential industries were exempted.
 
In practice, wealthy families could keep their children out of military service by getting them placed in "essential" jobs or bribing local officials and recruitment officers, many of whom also proved more than willing to falsify rosters, disregard the baojia and lottery systems, and pocket funds that the government had allocated for new recruits. And when these officials and recruiting officers had difficulty meeting the enlistment quotas due to their own corruption, they might resort to more drastic measures, such as arresting people on trumped up charges. This led to excesses like the ones described by Rummel, which were further exacerbated by China's lack of infrastructure and resources for moving and housing large numbers of fresh recruits.
 
Fully aware of these problems, the Nationalist Government made several attempts to reform the conscription system and impose more oversight on the local recruitment process (on one occasion, Chiang Kai-shek himself allegedly bludgeoned a member of a recruitment board with his cane and ordered the summary execution of a recruitment officer after witnessing the mistreatment of a group of new conscripts). However, these efforts were handicapped by the growth in corruption throughout all of Chinese society as the country's situation deteriorated, by the internal power struggles within the Military Service Bureau that occupied the attention of its officials, and by the weakness of the central government's influence throughout many parts of China, especially in rural areas. After 1944, however, with pressure and support from the United States, the Nationalists were reportedly able to improve overall conditions for conscripts.
 
Sources:
 
    Chen Mo and Wang Qisheng, Zhongguo kangri zhanzheng shi [A History of the Chinese War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression], vol. 4 (Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2019), 192-200
 
    F. F. Liu, A Military History of Modern China (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956), 131-138
 
[/quote]
 
 
In Rummel's book "China's Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900" he further shows his own biased agenda by engaging in outright lies, claiming China never won any battles against Japan in 1944-1945 and that Ichigo was the last battle and Japan was victorious, totally ignoring Soviet support for the Ili rebellion (China had over 120,000 soldiers in Xinjiang fight Soviet backed troops in the Ili rebellion in 1944-1946, stationed in Xinjiang since 1942 when they forced pro-Soviet warlord Sheng Shicai to defect.
 
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iIEPoEL4lG0C&pg=PA111#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
[quote]In 1944, the Japanese undertook their first major offensive since 1938, Operation Ichigo. Ostensibly the offensive was aimed at the airbases from which Major General Claire Chennault's Fourteenth Air Force had been operating successfully against Japanese rail lines and shipping.[/quote]
 
This is a blatant lie, Japan launched multiple major offensives from 1938-1944, Japan attempted to capture the Gansu corridor and set up the Huihuiguo puppet state in the battle of West Suiyuan and Wuyuan in 1939-1940 to sever the Soviet border.
 
Japan aimed to sever China's border with French Indochina in the battle of Kunlun pass in Guangxi in 1939-1940.
 
Japan aimed to captured Changsha three times before Ichigo, in 1939, 1941, 1941-1942
 
Japan invaded Yunnan west of the Salween and tried to cross to Baoshan in 1942.
 
Japan tried to invade West Hubei and Changde in northwest Hunan in 1943, just months before Ichigo.
 
Japan was defeated in every single one of those battles, in West Suiyuan, Wuyuan, Kunlun pass, first, second, third Changsha, Changde, West Hubei, and failed to cross the Salween to Baoshan.
 
China also launched the Winter offensive in 1939 and the Yichang offensive in 1941, which slaughtered Japanese positions around Yichang and Japan was forced to withdraw their troops from the second battle of Changsha and reinforce Yichang and spam mustard gas, Soviet advisors also said China would have won Yichang and chased Japan up to the Han river if Chiang didn't order a withdrawal for political reasons.
 
The very reason Japan went to war with the west is because Japan was defeated by China at Kunlun pass and West Suiyuan, Japan originally intended to sever China's borders with the Soviet Union and France in those battles (Britain agreed with Japan to shut down the Burma road in early 1940) to starve China out, so Japan wouldn't have to fight the west at the same time. 
 
US, UK, Netherlands were supplying Japan with oil in the entire war before 1940.
 
Since China defeated Japan at Kunlun Pass, Japan was forced to invade French Indochina, triggering the US embargo against Japan in 1940
 
[quote]But with American victories in the southwest Pacific and the coming Anglo-American offensive against the heart of the Japanese Empire, the Ichigo offensive had the strategic purpose of consolidating and extending Japanese control over China, thus “insuring a posture of undefeatability.” 22 In all, the Japanese launched sixteen divisions through Central and East China. Among cities in the path of the onslaught, such as Kweilin, Hengyang, and Liuchow, anxiety spread among the Chinese, especially where the Fourteenth Air Force began to destroy their airfields and ammunition. Civilians soon panicked, hundreds of thousands dying as they tried to flee.[/quote]
 
The secondary purpose of Ichigo after destroying airfields, was to consolidate control over the Beijing-Hanoi rail line to ship supplies between Japanese occupation Korea and Vietnam over land.
 
Since huge tracks were torn up by Chinese and the rail line was constantly bombarded by air, only a single train shipment succesfully crossed the entire line and Japan was unable to use the railway. 
 
 
[quote]23 Although opposed by no less than three or four times as many nationalist soldiers, 24 Japanese forces succeeded in capturing the airfields in East China[/quote]
 
Chiang Kai-shek sent poorly equipped warlord troops with inferior equipment to reinforce the 9th war zone during Ichigo.
 
Sichuan warlord troops only had one rifle and two grenades or a sword with straw sandals while storming Japanese positions armed with machine guns, mustard gas, tanks.
 
American generals also said Chiang withheld ammunition and weapons from Xue Yue's 9th war zone during Ichigo, due to political dispute were Xue Yue, Xue Yue was allegedly involved in other officers and warlords in a proposed coup attempt against Chiang, and Chiang refused to supply ammo and artillery and reinforcements until Xue Yue backed down.
 
https://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Command/USA-CBI-Command-10.html
https://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Command/USA-CBI-Command-11.html
 
Japan expected to overrun the outnumbered Chinese forces in Hengyang in three days, meanwhile it took weeks and tens of thousands of Japanese dead, with tons of fuel wasted and mustard gas bombardment for Japan to take Hengyang.
 
This is while poorly armed warlord troops with rifles, swords and grenades were the only ones trying to relieve Hengyang.
 
China also crushed the entire Japanese Burma Area army in Yunnan west of the Salween river in Tengchong and Mount Song, during Ichigo itself in 1944, recapturing all of West Yunnan.
 
[quote]They also gained control over 100,000,000 more Chinese 25 and virtually cut China in half. Most important, they had destroyed the Nationalist army as an effective fighting force.26[/quote]
 
This is a blatant lie and Rummel is making up figures as usual. the 100,000,000 includes tens of millions in Fujian, southern Jiangxi, southwest Zhejiang, northeast Guangdong who were NOT under Japanese occupation at all, but just physically separated from the Chongqing based government by Ichigo in east Hunan, Guangdong and Guangxi.
 
A Japanese soldier admitted in his war diary, that Japan did not actually control the rural areas in land "captured" in Ichigo, they only controlled cities along the rail line, like a disconnected series of dots. This same Japanese soldier also admitted Japan was defeated in Changsha for the first three times after really trying to capture the city, and that Japan lost the battle of West Hunan in 1945.
 
https://fum-tan.sakura.ne.jp/Konan.htm
 
Japan never controlled the rural areas in the so called "entirely occupied"  provinces like Hebei, Jiangsu, the rural areas right down to August 1945 were filled with guerillas, Japanese were only stationed in cities and fortified towers and forced to constantly attack the guerillas in raids.
 
Japanese war criminal medic Ken Yuasa in Shanxi admitted the same, that the Japanese army only controlled disconnected dots in the province, the rural mountain villages were not under their control.
 
[quote]In the last years of the war, the nationalists suffered an uninterrupted series of defeats. The government faced very severe economic difficulties, and its effectiveness was declining sharply. Public support was at its lowest; business groups and intellectuals were alienated. Almost every province under nationalist control saw peasant uprisings and rebellions. In 1943, for example, a rebelling peasant force of 50,000 grabbed much of southern Kansu Province; elsewhere 4,000 rebelled in Fukien Province.29 Nor were the minorities happy. In November 1944, Moslem Turks in Sinkiang Province successfully attacked Yining's Chinese garrison and soon declared an East Turkestan Republic. During the next year, they completely took over the three north westernmost districts of the province. This rebellion was not settled until 1946, when after a personal appeal by Chiang Kai- shek, negotiations began and a peace agreement was eventually signed.30[/quote]
 
Almost all this is blatant lies.
 
As I said, China crushed Japan in west Yunnan during Ichigo iself in 1944 and reconquered all of west Yunnan.
 
In 1945 China then defeated Japan's attempted invasion of West Henan at Xixiakou and attempted invasio of West Hunan to capture Zhijiang, and recaptured all of east Guangxi in the Second Guangxi campaign as well as Fuzhou, months before the atomic bombings.
 
Japan lost all west Yunnan and east Guangxi and Fuzhou, and Okamura was forced to order Japanese soldiers to begin to flee northeast to Shanghai to make their last stand before August 1945.
 
There was no peasant rebellions in Sichuan, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Ningxia, south Jiangxi, west Guangxi, Yunnan, and whatever happened in Fujian and Gansu barely disrupted the war effort. 
 
the November 1944 revolt was a Soviet backed revolt led by the Soviet army and Soviet air force itself, in the Ili rebellion, helping Uyghur communist rebels under Ehmetjan Kasimov, a Uyghur member of the Soviet communist party and hardcore Stalinist.
 
Soviet forces helped the Uyghur communists capture the three districts of Ili in the north, but failed to conquer the Tarim Basin and Turfan basin which make up most of Xinjiang and contain most of the actual Uyghur population, because most Uyghurs in the Tarim Basin were anti-Soviet, and their leaders Isa Yusuf Alptekin, Masud Sabriand Muhammad Amin Bughra supported China against the Soviets.
 
A Soviet directly attack against the Sarikol region of Tashkurgan in western Xinjiang was also defeated. The Soviet backed rebels also never captured Urumqi, the capital.
 
The reason it was settled in 1946 was because the Soviets forced their Uyghur communist puppets to settle into a coalition government with the nationalists, not because Chiang appealed to them, since the Uyghur communists failed to capture the Tarim basin as they wanted.
 
Stalin later killed Ehmetjan Kasimov, his Uyghur communist puppet, in a plane crash.
 
Chiang Kai-shek had moved 120,000 soldiers, both his own central government troops, and soldiers of the Hui Muslim warlord Ma Bufang, Ma Buqing into Xinjiang in 1942, to force pro-Soviet warlord Sheng Shicai to defect. Ma Bufang and Ma Buqing's troops were Hui Muslims, Turkic Salar Muslims, Dongxiang Muslims and Bonan Muslims.
 
The Soviets then supported the Uyghur communist Ili rebellion in November 1944 against China as revenge for Sheng Shica's defection and expulsion of Soviet army forces.
 
Sheng Shicai defected in 1943 and kicked out the Soviet Eighth Regiment from Kumul (Hami) and the 120,000 Nationalist and Ma warlord troops were the ones fighting against the Soviet backed Communist Uyghur rebels.
 
Rummel, who is an open anti-communist, refused to mention the fact that the Soviets supported the Uyghurs, doesn't mention that those Uyghurs were communist, and that Muslim Uyghurs under the three effendis (Masud Sabri, Muhammad Amin Bughra and Isa Yusuf Alptekin) supported China, and that Muslim warlord troops of Ma Bufang and Ma Buqing, made out of Muslim Turk Salars, Hui and Dongxiang and Bonan also fought for China against the Uyghur Communists.
 
This is while China was fighting Japan.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1779398415 user_id=116835]
Also, regarding the Moro fighters that Senshi Sosho denies existed, the Moro guerillas were in contact and communication with Allied supreme command YEARS BEFORE the Americans landed
 
already in 1943, Moro Muslim Imam Marajukim worked with Albert Kwok (Guo Hengnan) in the Jesselton revolt in 1943, in communication with Allied command. The Suluk Tausug Moro Muslims in Sabah, British Borneo worked with Albert Kwok in this October 1943 Jesselton revolt against Japan, in coordination with Imam Marajukim in Sulu and Philippine constubulary officer Alejandro Suarez.
 
The Suluk Tausug Moro Muslim woman Halima bint Amat in British Borneo, who was married to Chinese fighter Wong Mu Sing, received an award from allied officers on behalf of her husband when he was killed in action.
 
Chinese-Moro mestizo guerilla Teo Konglam rode on a submarine to Austrlia to communicate with allied command before being sent back to Tawi-Tawi in Sulu, that's why there's an official military file on him in Philippine military records at the collections.pvao.mil.ph website
 
Moro Muslim mujahideen guerillas used American style unit designations like I Company, 1st regiment, and Company C, 1st Bn, 125th Infantry, instead of names like "Katibat Sayf-Allah" or "Muhammad Rasul Allah brigades", because they were in communication with Allied command via submarines and were integrated into the Allied unit structure.
 
These Moros were photographed by American troops after the Americans landed in Jolo.
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/3094966117324887/?_rdr
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ww2pinas/posts/8871806076215478/?_rdr
 
[quote]April 10, 1945
"Guerrillas of 'I' Company, 1st Regiment, Indanan, Jolo Island, Sulu Archipelago, P.I." 
(NARA)
#WW2inPH #WWII #WW2 #JoloSulu #Jolo #Sulu[/quote]
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/ronaldo.narag.1/posts/this-photograph-taken-on-april-10-1945-shows-guerrillas-of-i-company-1st-regimen/27137476485838861/?_rdr
 
[quote]Perez Manuel Odlanor
18 April at 18:34  ·
This photograph, taken on April 10, 1945, shows Guerrillas of 'I' Company, 1st Regiment, standing in formation at Indanan, Jolo Island, in Sulu Archipelago. The image captures Filipino irregular forces who played a critical role in the resistance against Japanese occupation during World War II. Shortly after this photo was taken, on April 27, 1945, Major General Jens Doe, the commanding general of the 41st Division, visited this same guerrilla headquarters to inspect the troops. 
   Across islands like Luzon and Sulu, diverse groups of Filipino irregulars sustained the resistance for years, providing vital intelligence and support to Allied forces. By 1945, Allied forces were actively working with these local guerrilla units to reclaim territory from the Imperial Japanese Army.
   This resistance followed the initial Japanese invasion in 1942, which led to the fall of Bataan and the subsequent Bataan Death March.🇺🇲🇵🇭[/quote]
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/2076013609220148/?_rdr
 
[quote]Memories of Old Manila & Beyond
Paul Eric Darvin
  · May 20, 2021  ·
Guerrillas greet American troops, Jolo Island, 1945
Description of photo reads:
April 10, 1945
Technicolor Government Services, Inc.
"Guerrillas of Company C, 1st Bn, 125th Infantry, left, greet the American patrol of the 41st Infantry as the American troops arrive at the village of Indanan, Jolo Island.
US Signal Corps"[/quote]
 
 
[quote=limited post_id=2623553 time=1777912335 user_id=116835]
I posted a picture of Moro guerilla fighters, photographed by American soldiers, in Jolo in 1945, after the Americans landed on Jolo on 9 April 1945. The Moro Tausug on Jolo had been fighting the Japanese the entire year before since 1944.
 
https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AM6AD5JXGSCC628Z
 
Senshi Sosho denies they existed.
 
Every single Japanese soldier who was interviewed or served in Sulu and Mindanao, like Fujioka Akiyoshi, Akira Makino and Japanese soldiers at Tamparan, all say the Moros were their biggest enemy and constantly attacked the Japanese.
 
Senshi Soshi denies any Moros took part in the battle of Jolo. Senshi Sosho claims the entire battle of Jolo, Sulu and Mindanao were against Americans who landed in 1945 and that no fighting against Moros took place, and nothing was happening in 1944.
 
Notice how Adachi sneakily tries to claim Moro Muslims are "Chinese chauvinists" instead of actually addressing any of the sources in the post.
 
Also, note how the Japanese POW in 1944 was captured by Chinese, but then handed over to Americans for interrogation, and the Americans recorded his testimony about the 1942 biological weapons friendly fire, and deemed it to be reliable.
 
If Chinese recorded the interrogation and published it, Adachi would have called it lies and propaganda.
 
And actual proof from American military records that Senshi Sosho is lying.
 
Senshi Sosho denies that Moros were killing and fighting Japanese in 1944-1945 and that the battle only started on 9 April 1945 when Americans landed. Senshi Sosho then says there were only 3,425 Japanese soldiers on Jolo and only 135 survived. (Senshi Soho's own figure that 96% died, does not match up with 135 out of 3,425, so they contradict even their own lies)
 
[quote]238. The Bōeichō senshishitsu (Defense Agency Military History Room), Shō-gō rikugunsakusen (2), numbers the force of arms at the time of the American invasion at a small 3,425 men, with the Independent Combined 55th Brigade (the Suga Brigade) as its nucleus (645). Yet according to Ministry of Health and Welfare sources the number of those who died in battle on Jolo Island during the Asia-Pacific War was 6,030.
[/quote]
 
Japan Centre for Asian Historical Records gives higher figure of  3,875 Japanese on Jolo, while Japan's Ministry of Health and Welfare says 6,000 Japanese soldiers were on Jolo and they died. 
 
Now looking at American military sources, American military directly notes the presence of Moro Muslim guerillas already fighting the Japanese greeted the American landing on Jolo, so its a blatant lie that no Moros were fighting Japan before that.
 
American military says there were 3,900 Japanese soldiers left on Jolo when America landed on 9 April 1945 (the Moros already killed 2,100 Japanese in the year before that) 
 
Those 3,900 Japanese soldiers holed up on Mount Daho, and the Americans and the Moro guerillas then killed 2,000 of the Japanese on Mount Daho from 9-22 April 1945.
 
Then by Japan's surrender in August 1945, only less than 90 Japanese remained to surrender (the rest of died between 22 April and August)
 
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/March-April-2024/Command/
 
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MA-24/Command/Light-but-Aggressive-Command-UA.pdf
 
[quote]In the Sulu Archipelago, the 41st Division was able to seize the islands of Basilan, Malamaui, Tawi Tawi, Sanga Sanga, and Bangao in rapid succession using company- and battalion-size landing forces. However, the division’s 163rd RCT, supported by Filipino guerrillas, found itself locked in intense combat to dislodge 3,900 Japanese defenders around Mount Daho on Jolo Island.16 Even with significant artillery and Marine Corps air support, it took from 9 to 22 April to dislodge the defenders and another two months to mop up the remaining Japanese, with the Americans losing forty killed and 125 wounded to two thousand Japanese losses. Fewer than ninety Japanese survived to surrender at the end of the war.[/quote]
 
This does not match up with Senshi Sosho figures at all. Also note that the stand on Mount Daho wasn't due to bravery, Fujioka Akiyoshi who was on Jolo said he and other Japanese soldier's morale totally broke down and they wanted to surrender and were fearful of dying and being killed by Moros, and Japanese soldiers fought each other for supplies, but their superior officers would not let them surrender and threatened them. Japanese officers would do fake surrenders, suddenly shooting at the Americans in the Pacific while pretending to surrender, to ensure Americans would not trust any Japanese and kill every Japanese grunt soldier attempting to surrender, so they could force their own men to fight to the death when they didn't want to.
 
Westerners often insult Soviet NKVD blocking battalions for forcing soldiers to fight to the death by shooting anyone who tried to surrender or retreat, but then weebs praise Japanese soldiers who admitted they were afraid of death and only forced to fight to the death by their officers doing the same as Soviet NKVD officers to their troops. The same thing when they praise numerically superior Japanese human waves against outnumbered Russians at Nanshan and the land siege of Port Arthur in the Russo-Japanese war, when Russians slaughtered the Japanese human wave attacks and Japan lost more dead, they praise the numerically superior human waves as bravery, but then insult China (which never used these type of human wave attacks and only used "short attacks" in the Korean war which involved tactical squads infiltrating and surrounding enemies.
 
Official Philippine and American military records and histories also record the names of Chinese-Moro mestizo guerillas like Teo Konglam and Tan Saituan sent into combat as undercover guerillas in 1942-1944 in the Sulu archipelago like Tawi-Tawi, that Senshi Sosho denies existed.
 
http://collections.pvao.mil.ph/Collections/MacArthurMicrofilms/RG_16/R-346/PERSONNEL_FILES_INDIVIDUAL_TEO,_KONGLAM.PDF
http://collections.pvao.mil.ph/MacArthurMicrofilms/InformationDownload/342
 
https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/8362000C.pdf
 
https://archive.org/details/sulu-area-command
 
https://archive.org/details/508811524-with-the-bravest-the-untold-story-of-the-sulu-freedom-fighters-of-world-war-ii.mpdf
https://pdfcoffee.com/with-the-bravest-the-untold-story-of-the-sulu-freedom-fighters-of-world-war-ii-2-pdf-free.html
https://www.scribd.com/document/508811524/WITH-THE-BRAVEST-The-Untold-Story-of-the-Sulu-Freedom-Fighters-of-World-War-II
https://www.facebook.com/historyphils/posts/on-november-12-1952-tausug-freedom-fighter-datu-hadji-kamlon-surrendered-to-the-/1410290461102131/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CantilanHistoricalPreservationMovement/posts/1876182269093519/https://www.facebook.com/AdmiralEspaldon/posts/the-americans-surrendered-but-muslim-and-christian-officers-and-men-refused-to-f/602813545220918/
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/nurainee/photos/d41d8cd9/10159424858840808/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/posts/mula-sa-mga-pasilyo-ng-university-of-the-philippines-hanggang-sa-puso-ng-bangsam/122314683074222859/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/photos/isang-mensahe-para-sa-kabataang-bangsamoroaralin-ang-inyong-kasaysayan-igalang-a/122313566444222859/
https://fliphtml5.com/gdeit/vqgi/Second-OPAPRU-Peace-Research-Conference-Proceedings/
https://fliphtml5.com/gdeit/rynr/Second-OPAPRU-Peace-Research-Conference-Proceedings/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/photos/mula-sa-mga-pasilyo-ng-university-of-the-philippines-hanggang-sa-puso-ng-bangsam/122314683056222859/
 
https://www.facebook.com/USePofficial/photos/d41d8cd9/1352238186935767/
https://www.facebook.com/MNLFCC/posts/mubarak-to-deputy-minister-ustadha-nur-ainee-the-daughter-of-founding-leader-and/1131811275805328/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/posts/barmm-deputy-minister-nur-ainee-tan-lim-honored-as-one-of-the-2025-outstanding-w/122269806596222859/
https://www.facebook.com/barmmwomen/posts/25-april-2024-i-16-shawwal-1445-ahbangsamoro-womens-movement-honored-at-tafs-202/847100534123496/
https://www.facebook.com/nurainee/posts/understanding-economic-crisisfuel-prices-rising-costs-what-you-can-dofrom-crisis/1608998293477727/
https://www.facebook.com/USePofficial/posts/%F0%9D%93%99%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%B7-%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%BC%F0%9D%93%9F%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%AB%F0%9D%93%BE%F0%9D%93%B4%F0%9D%93%AA-%F0%9D%93%B1%F0%9D%93%AA-%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%A2%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%9F-%F0%9D%93%90-%F0%9D%93%92%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%B5%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%AB%F0%9D%93%BB%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%B7-%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%AF-%F0%9D%93%95%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%93%B1-%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%B7%F0%9D%93%AD-%F0%9D%93%93%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BF%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%BB%F0%9D%93%BC%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%95%AApabuka-ha-usep-creates/1352225043603748/
https://m.facebook.com/100063919662448/photos/1029824419158204/
https://www.facebook.com/MNLFCC/
https://m.facebook.com/100063919662448/photos/953535523453761/
 
https://www.facebook.com/historyphils/posts/on-november-12-1952-tausug-freedom-fighter-datu-hadji-kamlon-surrendered-to-the-/1410290461102131/
https://www.facebook.com/ToymImaoArtist/posts/3043370902458515/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ww2pinas/posts/3370572656338875/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CantilanHistoricalPreservationMovement/posts/1876182269093519/
https://www.facebook.com/AdmiralEspaldon/posts/the-americans-surrendered-but-muslim-and-christian-officers-and-men-refused-to-f/602813545220918/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/3069637503191082/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/857239070986850/posts/2476162465761161/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1462909890582137/posts/1694201984119592/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/1445686402252875/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/malaysianfoodinuk/posts/25721844247399283/
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1779397824 user_id=116835]
[quote=limited post_id=2625287 time=1779397696 user_id=116835]
As I said on this thread before, Japan only attacked in China where their tanks, trucks and armoued train carriages could go. Japan wanted to go further, but couldn't, contrary to myths promoted by people like Eugene Pinak that Japan could go further but chose not to.
 
In 1940, after Japan invaded French Indochina, westerners in 1940-1941 drew up maps for Japan's next moves, they predicted either two actions, Japan would invade Shan state in British Burma to seize the Burma road, or would try to attack along the railline from Haiphong-Hanoi-Laocau(Laokay)-Mengtsz(Mengzi)-Kunming to seize Yunnan's capital.
 
However, the map showing these plans explicitly notes that "Mountains barrier to attack" for the possible invasion along the rail line into Yunnan.
 
https://photos.com/featured/map-of-burma-road-bettmann.html?srsltid=AfmBOor1qgY9ICtmdz-99kn1eX4h15J7naJ-PbeRQEFbfXz4vPAd1YRr
 
https://photos.com/featured/map-of-burma-road-bettmann.html?product=framed-print&srsltid=AfmBOorlUvdyqtJsXvfR-pwyPnJhduX1xO_E3Ajc7_73ZF4VBB1M41Fj
 
Meanwhile, it shows an all clear path for Japan to sever the Burma road at Lashio, the Burma road leading into western Yunnan wester of the Salween at Wanting (Wanding), Lungling (Longling), Baoshan (Paoshan)
 
It then shows in Yunnan east of the Salween river, that the highway east of the Salween could easily be targeted by bombs on the ridges and winding roads.
 
And in 1942, the Japanese as predicted, chose to invade Shan state in British Burma and try to invade Yunnan via the Burma road in the west.
 
The exact reason why the Burma road was built going into western Yunnan west of the Salween is because of the terrain, that was the path of least resistance for a road suitable for motor vehicles, tanks, lorries (trucks).
 
And that was the reason Japan invaded western Yunnan along the Burma road, and tried to cross the Salween on a pontoon bridge to seize Baoshan until Chennault's AVG bombed the Japanese pontoon bridge and bombed the Japanese tank column waiting to pass in 1942, instead of invading via the Hanoi-Kunming rail line where Japan would be easily ambushed in the gorges of south Yunnan, the rail line easily severed and Japan would suffer horrific casualties.
 
 
 
https://www.dangerousroads.org/images/thumbs/779x499/0/burmaroad-1dfd416e.avif
 
https://www.dangerousroads.org/asia/china/321-burma-road-china.html
 
 
 
Eugene Pinak here falsely claims that the IJA "Japanese haven't invaded Yunnan from any direction because they felt no need for this. Actual IJA incursion into Yunnan in 1942 was not to capture province, but to ensure better defensive positions for Burma."
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/1dyq9r4/why_didnt_the_japanese_try_to_invade_eastern/lcbgtct/
 
[quote][–]EugenPinak 
 
The answer is simple - Japanese haven't invaded Yunnan from any direction because they felt no need for this. Actual IJA incursion into Yunnan in 1942 was not to capture province, but to ensure better defensive positions for Burma.
 
By itself Yunnan had no strategic value - it was only useful as an "unloading point" for Burma Road. When Japanese received access to North Vietnam in 1940 - Burma Road was closed by British. Why to invade it?
 
And when Burma Road was opened in 1941 - Japanese were already ready to invade Burma itself. Yes, they've tried some strategic bombing of supply points in Yunnan in 1941, but that was just just a small show before real attack on Burma.
 
 
[–][deleted] 
    By itself Yunnan had no strategic value
 
Did it not? It was basically one of the two useful provinces that the Nationalists had left, it was (by Chinese standards) industrialized, it was the home of the Chinese Air Force, and all foreign supplies to China, whether over the Hump or Burma Road, went through Yunnan
[/quote]
 
First, Yunnan had vital mineral reserves for the war like copper, tin, lead and iron, and a direct path to Sichuan.
 
Chennault himself contradicted this lie that Japan didn't intend to invade east of the Salween, as I mentioned repeatedly. 
 
Chennault in 1942 said his pilots saw Japanese constructing a pontoon bridge on the Salween river, after the Chinese blew up Huitong bridge along the Burma road path, and an entire Japanese tank column was waiting to cross the pontoon and spearhead an attack on Baoshan east of the Salween.
 
Chennault's AVG then bombed the entire pontoon bridge and Japanese tank column.
 
That meant Japan fully intended on proceeding east along the Burma road route into Baoshan, east of the Salween but were defeated and stopped by the destruction of the pontoon bridge.
 
Another person wrote this
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/1dyq9r4/why_didnt_the_japanese_try_to_invade_eastern/lcdwgrc/
[quote]
ScipioAsina 
In September 1941, the China Expeditionary Army (CEA) did propose an advance against Kunming from Vietnam using six or seven divisions, which would form part of a larger effort to cut off the Nationalists' access to the outside world. However, Tojo and Chief of the General Staff Sugiyama rejected the plan, instead prioritizing the forthcoming operations against British, American, and Dutch forces in Southeast Asia.1 A move upon Kunming via Vietnam came under discussion again in late 1944 and early 1945 when the CEA suggested a wide-reaching offensive against the Nationalists in coordination with the Southern Army to capitalize on the successes of Ichi-gō. But in view of Japan's deteriorating strategic situation, Imperial General Headquarters only authorized the CEA to carry out smaller-scale campaigns against Allied airfields in China.2 (Incidentally, these campaigns would go very poorly for the Japanese, though those are stories for another day.)
 
The Nationalist high command also recognized that the Japanese might use Vietnam to strike at Kunming. Operational plans drafted in early November 1941 envisioned a defense in depth, with the Japanese being drawn deep into mountainous and fortified areas of Yunnan, where they could then be isolated and encircled; in addition, Chinese forces would enter Vietnam via Guangxi and engage in guerrilla fighting against the Japanese rear.3 Concerns about a Japanese invasion from Vietnam seem to have increased after the Allied defeat in the First Burma Campaign, and the Nationalists began strengthening their garrison forces and fortifications around Kunming in late 1942.4
 
Sources:
 
1 Wang Fu, Rijun qin Hua zhanzheng: 1931-1945 [The Japanese Military's War of Aggression Against China: 1931-1945], 4 vols. (Liaoning: Liaoning renmin chubanshe, 1990), 3:1466.
 
2 Ibid., 4:2496-2502.
 
3 Junlingbu [General Staff], "Quebao Dian Mian lu zuozhan jihua" [Operational Plans for Securing the Yunnan-Burma Road] (November 3, 1941), in Dian Mian kangzhan dang'an [Archival Materials on the War of Resistance in Yunnan and Burma], 3 vols., ed. Zhongguo di'er lishi dang'anguan [Second Historical Archives of China] (Beijing: Zhongguo wenshi chubanshe, 2019), 1:11 (abbreviated hereafter as DMKD).
 
4 Lin Wei, Liu Fei, yu Shidiwei jiangjun tanhua jiyao ji yijian jushen [Minutes of a Discussion Between Generals Lin Wei, Liu Fei, and Stilwell and Their Proposals] (November 12, 1942), DMKD, 2:407; Junlingbu [General Staff], "Shoufu Miandian zuozhan jihua" [Operational Plans for Recovering Burma] (November 1942), DMKD, 2:415; Tongmenjun fangong Miandian zhi zhuangkuang panduan [Status Assessment of an Allied Counterattack in Burma] (1942), DMKD, 2:419f.
 
[–]ScipioAsina 6 points 1 year ago* 
 
None that I know of, unfortunately, but I can give you some info about those sources.
 
The first one cited there, the book by Wang Fu, is a rather uneven military history of the Second Sino-Japanese War that happens to make extensive use of Japanese sources, especially the official Senshi Sōsho [War History Series]. I often turn to Wang if I want a summary of what the Senshi Sōsho says on particular topic, as that work can be difficult to navigate, and I read Chinese far more fluently than Japanese.
 
The other sources I cited come from a recently published collection of archival materials relating to Chinese military operations in Yunnan and Burma, which includes operational plans, minutes of high-level meetings, combat diaries, and after-action reports. Over the decades, researchers in both Taiwan and the PRC have published similar collections drawn from the Nationalists' wartime archives, and many documents are also available digitally through the Academia Historica.
 
To answer your second question: no, I don't believe the plan to attack Yunnan via Vietnam was feasible, given the difficult terrain, the underdeveloped infrastructure, the weakness of Japanese logistics, and Chinese defensive preparations. Those are more-or-less the same reasons why the Second Sino-Japanese War remained a stalemate for as long as it did; in the hopes of breaking that stalemate, leaders on both sides regularly entertained plans such as this one, which were more ambitious or optimistic than could be justified by the realities of the situation. Even Operation Ichi-gō, a major Japanese tactical victory in terms of ground taken and casualties inflicted, failed to accomplish its basic strategic objective of reducing Allied air power in China, while the two follow-up operations against the airfields at Laohekou and Zhijiang proved disastrous for the Japanese as they overextended and encountered better-prepared Nationalist forces. I imagine a similar outcome for a Japanese incursion into eastern Yunnan.
[/quote]
 
Note he also makes errors or omissions.
 
China crushed the Japanese Burma area Army west of the Salween in Tengchong and Mount Song in late 1944, at the same time as Ichigo and as the proposed second Japanese offensive into Yunnan via Vietnam. This user doesn't mention that.
 
So no, the proposed offensive wasn't to capitalise on Ichigo, and it wasn't canceled due to the detoriating Japanese situation elsewhere, Japan desperately needed to rescue the remaining Japanese soldiers west of the Salween who were getting annihilated, but was forced to call off the plan because it couldn't carry it out.
 
Japan was forced to waste weeks at Hengyang and expend tons of fuel and ammunition and lose men there when they planned to take it within three days.
 
Ichigo was also forced to stop at Dushan in southern Guangxi after Chinese blew up the bridge over the gorge there just like at Salween, and after violent resistance by Sun Yuanliang and locals, not because Japan voluntarily stopped Ichigo.
 
Japanese generals gave their armies dual orders as always, after capturing Tengchong in 1942, they also had a second order to capture Baoshan by the pontoon bridge but failed.
 
After capturing the rail line from Guangxi to Vietnam, Japanese troops had a secondary order to invade Guizhou and capture Guiyang if they could. they were defeated and stopped at Dushan.
 
Japan also didn't actually control any of the land outside of cities and fortified posts along the "captured areas", Japanese control as a series of disconnected dots on a map with the countryside outside of their control.
 
Japan also didn't just intend to capture airfields at Laohekou in battle of north Hubei and Zhijiang in the battle of West Hunan in 1945. Okamura delusionally believed he could conquer all China by trigeering a domino collapse, and in 1945 also attacked West Henan at Xixiakou where there was no airfield, in order to try to reach Shaanxi, in addition to Laohekou and Zhijiang.
 
Japan was defeated at both West Henan at Xixiakou and at West Hunan and never reached Zhijiang airbase, and only took Laohekou after weeks of fighting and failed to advance further. 
 
Okamura was then forced to withdraw and flee from east Guangxi in the Second Guangxi campaign and abandon Fuzhou and issue orders for all troops to retreat northeast to Shanghai, months before the atomic bombs.
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1777956282 user_id=116835]
I posted a picture of Moro guerilla fighters, photographed by American soldiers, in Jolo in 1945, after the Americans landed on Jolo on 9 April 1945. The Moro Tausug on Jolo had been fighting the Japanese the entire year before since 1944.
 
https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AM6AD5JXGSCC628Z
 
Senshi Sosho denies they existed.
 
Every single Japanese soldier who was interviewed or served in Sulu and Mindanao, like Fujioka Akiyoshi, Akira Makino and Japanese soldiers at Tamparan, all say the Moros were their biggest enemy and constantly attacked the Japanese.
 
Senshi Soshi denies any Moros took part in the battle of Jolo. Senshi Sosho claims the entire battle of Jolo, Sulu and Mindanao were against Americans who landed in 1945 and that no fighting against Moros took place, and nothing was happening in 1944.
 
Notice how Adachi sneakily tries to claim Moro Muslims are "Chinese chauvinists" instead of actually addressing any of the sources in the post.
 
Also, note how the Japanese POW in 1944 was captured by Chinese, but then handed over to Americans for interrogation, and the Americans recorded his testimony about the 1942 biological weapons friendly fire, and deemed it to be reliable.
 
If Chinese recorded the interrogation and published it, Adachi would have called it lies and propaganda.
 
And actual proof from American military records that Senshi Sosho is lying.
 
Senshi Sosho denies that Moros were killing and fighting Japanese in 1944-1945 and that the battle only started on 9 April 1945 when Americans landed. Senshi Sosho then says there were only 3,425 Japanese soldiers on Jolo and only 135 survived. (Senshi Soho's own figure that 96% died, does not match up with 135 out of 3,425, so they contradict even their own lies)
 
[quote]238. The Bōeichō senshishitsu (Defense Agency Military History Room), Shō-gō rikugunsakusen (2), numbers the force of arms at the time of the American invasion at a small 3,425 men, with the Independent Combined 55th Brigade (the Suga Brigade) as its nucleus (645). Yet according to Ministry of Health and Welfare sources the number of those who died in battle on Jolo Island during the Asia-Pacific War was 6,030.
[/quote]
 
Japan Centre for Asian Historical Records gives higher figure of  3,875 Japanese on Jolo, while Japan's Ministry of Health and Welfare says 6,000 Japanese soldiers were on Jolo and they died. 
 
Now looking at American military sources, American military directly notes the presence of Moro Muslim guerillas already fighting the Japanese greeted the American landing on Jolo, so its a blatant lie that no Moros were fighting Japan before that.
 
American military says there were 3,900 Japanese soldiers left on Jolo when America landed on 9 April 1945 (the Moros already killed 2,100 Japanese in the year before that) 
 
Those 3,900 Japanese soldiers holed up on Mount Daho, and the Americans and the Moro guerillas then killed 2,000 of the Japanese on Mount Daho from 9-22 April 1945.
 
Then by Japan's surrender in August 1945, only less than 90 Japanese remained to surrender (the rest of died between 22 April and August)
 
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/March-April-2024/Command/
 
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MA-24/Command/Light-but-Aggressive-Command-UA.pdf
 
[quote]In the Sulu Archipelago, the 41st Division was able to seize the islands of Basilan, Malamaui, Tawi Tawi, Sanga Sanga, and Bangao in rapid succession using company- and battalion-size landing forces. However, the division’s 163rd RCT, supported by Filipino guerrillas, found itself locked in intense combat to dislodge 3,900 Japanese defenders around Mount Daho on Jolo Island.16 Even with significant artillery and Marine Corps air support, it took from 9 to 22 April to dislodge the defenders and another two months to mop up the remaining Japanese, with the Americans losing forty killed and 125 wounded to two thousand Japanese losses. Fewer than ninety Japanese survived to surrender at the end of the war.[/quote]
 
This does not match up with Senshi Sosho figures at all. Also note that the stand on Mount Daho wasn't due to bravery, Fujioka Akiyoshi who was on Jolo said he and other Japanese soldier's morale totally broke down and they wanted to surrender and were fearful of dying and being killed by Moros, and Japanese soldiers fought each other for supplies, but their superior officers would not let them surrender and threatened them. Japanese officers would do fake surrenders, suddenly shooting at the Americans in the Pacific while pretending to surrender, to ensure Americans would not trust any Japanese and kill every Japanese grunt soldier attempting to surrender, so they could force their own men to fight to the death when they didn't want to.
 
Westerners often insult Soviet NKVD blocking battalions for forcing soldiers to fight to the death by shooting anyone who tried to surrender or retreat, but then weebs praise Japanese soldiers who admitted they were afraid of death and only forced to fight to the death by their officers doing the same as Soviet NKVD officers to their troops. The same thing when they praise numerically superior Japanese human waves against outnumbered Russians at Nanshan and the land siege of Port Arthur in the Russo-Japanese war, when Russians slaughtered the Japanese human wave attacks and Japan lost more dead, they praise the numerically superior human waves as bravery, but then insult China (which never used these type of human wave attacks and only used "short attacks" in the Korean war which involved tactical squads infiltrating and surrounding enemies.
 
Official Philippine and American military records and histories also record the names of Chinese-Moro mestizo guerillas like Teo Konglam and Tan Saituan sent into combat as undercover guerillas in 1942-1944 in the Sulu archipelago like Tawi-Tawi, that Senshi Sosho denies existed.
 
http://collections.pvao.mil.ph/Collections/MacArthurMicrofilms/RG_16/R-346/PERSONNEL_FILES_INDIVIDUAL_TEO,_KONGLAM.PDF
http://collections.pvao.mil.ph/MacArthurMicrofilms/InformationDownload/342
 
https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/8362000C.pdf
 
https://archive.org/details/sulu-area-command
 
https://archive.org/details/508811524-with-the-bravest-the-untold-story-of-the-sulu-freedom-fighters-of-world-war-ii.mpdf
https://pdfcoffee.com/with-the-bravest-the-untold-story-of-the-sulu-freedom-fighters-of-world-war-ii-2-pdf-free.html
https://www.scribd.com/document/508811524/WITH-THE-BRAVEST-The-Untold-Story-of-the-Sulu-Freedom-Fighters-of-World-War-II
https://www.facebook.com/historyphils/posts/on-november-12-1952-tausug-freedom-fighter-datu-hadji-kamlon-surrendered-to-the-/1410290461102131/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CantilanHistoricalPreservationMovement/posts/1876182269093519/https://www.facebook.com/AdmiralEspaldon/posts/the-americans-surrendered-but-muslim-and-christian-officers-and-men-refused-to-f/602813545220918/
 
 
https://www.facebook.com/nurainee/photos/d41d8cd9/10159424858840808/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/posts/mula-sa-mga-pasilyo-ng-university-of-the-philippines-hanggang-sa-puso-ng-bangsam/122314683074222859/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/photos/isang-mensahe-para-sa-kabataang-bangsamoroaralin-ang-inyong-kasaysayan-igalang-a/122313566444222859/
https://fliphtml5.com/gdeit/vqgi/Second-OPAPRU-Peace-Research-Conference-Proceedings/
https://fliphtml5.com/gdeit/rynr/Second-OPAPRU-Peace-Research-Conference-Proceedings/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/photos/mula-sa-mga-pasilyo-ng-university-of-the-philippines-hanggang-sa-puso-ng-bangsam/122314683056222859/
 
https://www.facebook.com/USePofficial/photos/d41d8cd9/1352238186935767/
https://www.facebook.com/MNLFCC/posts/mubarak-to-deputy-minister-ustadha-nur-ainee-the-daughter-of-founding-leader-and/1131811275805328/
https://www.facebook.com/mahardikaparty/posts/barmm-deputy-minister-nur-ainee-tan-lim-honored-as-one-of-the-2025-outstanding-w/122269806596222859/
https://www.facebook.com/barmmwomen/posts/25-april-2024-i-16-shawwal-1445-ahbangsamoro-womens-movement-honored-at-tafs-202/847100534123496/
https://www.facebook.com/nurainee/posts/understanding-economic-crisisfuel-prices-rising-costs-what-you-can-dofrom-crisis/1608998293477727/
https://www.facebook.com/USePofficial/posts/%F0%9D%93%99%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%B7-%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%BC%F0%9D%93%9F%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%AB%F0%9D%93%BE%F0%9D%93%B4%F0%9D%93%AA-%F0%9D%93%B1%F0%9D%93%AA-%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%A2%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%9F-%F0%9D%93%90-%F0%9D%93%92%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%B5%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%AB%F0%9D%93%BB%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%B7-%F0%9D%93%B8%F0%9D%93%AF-%F0%9D%93%95%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%93%B1-%F0%9D%93%AA%F0%9D%93%B7%F0%9D%93%AD-%F0%9D%93%93%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BF%F0%9D%93%AE%F0%9D%93%BB%F0%9D%93%BC%F0%9D%93%B2%F0%9D%93%BD%F0%9D%95%AApabuka-ha-usep-creates/1352225043603748/
https://m.facebook.com/100063919662448/photos/1029824419158204/
https://www.facebook.com/MNLFCC/
https://m.facebook.com/100063919662448/photos/953535523453761/
 
https://www.facebook.com/historyphils/posts/on-november-12-1952-tausug-freedom-fighter-datu-hadji-kamlon-surrendered-to-the-/1410290461102131/
https://www.facebook.com/ToymImaoArtist/posts/3043370902458515/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ww2pinas/posts/3370572656338875/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/CantilanHistoricalPreservationMovement/posts/1876182269093519/
https://www.facebook.com/AdmiralEspaldon/posts/the-americans-surrendered-but-muslim-and-christian-officers-and-men-refused-to-f/602813545220918/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/3069637503191082/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/857239070986850/posts/2476162465761161/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1462909890582137/posts/1694201984119592/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/1445686402252875/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/malaysianfoodinuk/posts/25721844247399283/
[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1777930868 user_id=116835]
[quote=adachi post_id=2623568 time=1777927281 user_id=89715]
[quote=limited post_id=2623553 time=1777912335 user_id=116835]
Japan's Ministry of Health and Welfare says 6,000 Japanese soldiers were on Jolo and they died.
[/quote]
 
But according to you Japanese all lied about their losses and there were no accurate records?
[/quote]
 
Giving different numbers ≠ accurate
 
The Tokyo Fire Department gave a different number than the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department on the firebombing death toll in Tokyo, 97,000 dead and 83,793 dead.
 
The true number of dead in the Tokyo firebombing is unknown to this day, and could be multiple times higher, anywhere from 100,000 to 1,000,0000.
 
Many records were destroyed in the firebombing which burned municipal buildings, just like in the Battle of Okinawa, one third of the population was killed and tons of records were burnt and destroyed, which is one of the reason so many Okinawan centenarian claims cannot be accurately verified since their birth records were destroyed.
 
Different Japanese government agencies can make up any fake number they want for the death toll and give different numbers.
 
6,000 is just the minimum death toll on Jolo, since Senshi Sosho is lying.
 
 
 
Also, note the projection here on untrustworthiness. Chinese histories like Shiji written 2,000 years ago were accused of being fake in the early 20th century, but when Shang dynasty oracle bones were dug up from 1250 BC, it turned out Chinese histories like Shiji were 99% accurate, with only a few discrepancies. Chinese history records written over the past 3,000 years largely have told the truth and are confirmed regularly by archeological evidence like epitaphs and inscriptions which have been dug up.
 
Pretty much all Japanese history before the 6th century AD, written in Nihon Shoki belongs to the realm of alternate reality science fiction, with all the make believe monarchs before the 6th century AD retroactively given the title of Emperor, a title that did not exist in Japan back then. This was done to hide the Yayoi era kingdoms like Na, Yamatai (Himiko and Iyo) and Kuna which were tributaries of Han and Cao Wei dynasties of China and paid tribute including Japanese slaves to China. Japan even falsely claimed Kofuns were tombs of ancestors of the current Japanese monarchs, when there is no proof they reigned before the 6th century.
 
Also, documented history after the 6th century AD shows a record of treachery and deceit. Prince Ōama (called Emperor Tenmu in Japan) overthrew the rightful monarch, his nephew Ōtomo in the Jinshin war and took his throne.
 
The Japanese Northern Court emperors lied to the Southern Court emperors promising to alternate the throne with them, but when the Northern Court were given the throne, they reneged on their word and kept the throne for their own branch to this day.
 
Hideyoshi killed his own nephew and his family after initially promising him the throne, after his own son was born and then made his son his successor. Tokugawa Ieyasu then backstabbed Hideyoshi's son and betrayed him in turn.
 
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso literally made up fake history when talking to foreign diplomats as justification for his government policy towards China, like falsely claiming Japan was never tributary of China and was always hostile to Chinese dominance, and falsely claiming that Japan's current family ruled for over 2,000 years.
 
This is done to try to one-up China due to inferiority complex, China has the oldest continuously reigning noble family in the world, the Kong family descended from Confucius which held their noble title for 2,200 years and can trace their verified paternal ancestry for 3,600 years. When the Kong family split into Northern (Qufu) and Southern (Quzhou) branches, both branches were allowed to hold titles instead of backstabbing the other.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1777930624 user_id=116835]
Giving different numbers ≠ accurate
 
The Tokyo Fire Department gave a different number than the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department on the firebombing death toll in Tokyo, 97,000 dead and 83,793 dead.
 
The true number of dead in the Tokyo firebombing is unknown to this day, and could be multiple times higher, anywhere from 100,000 to 1,000,0000.
 
Many records were destroyed in the firebombing which burned municipal buildings, just like in the Battle of Okinawa, one third of the population was killed and tons of records were burnt and destroyed, which is one of the reason so many Okinawan centenarian claims cannot be accurately verified since their birth records were destroyed.
 
Different Japanese government agencies can make up any fake number they want for the death toll and give different numbers.
 
6,000 is just the minimum death toll on Jolo, since Senshi Sosho is lying.
 
 
 
Also, note the projection here on untrustworthiness. Chinese histories like Shiji written 2,000 years ago were accused of being fake in the early 20th century, but when Shang dynasty oracle bones were dug up from 1250 BC, it turned out Chinese histories like Shiji were 99% accurate, with only a few discrepancies. Chinese history records written over the past 3,000 years largely have told the truth and are confirmed regularly by archeological evidence like epitaphs and inscriptions which have been dug up.
 
Pretty much all Japanese history before the 6th century AD, written in Nihon Shoki belongs to the realm of alternate reality science fiction, with all the make believe monarchs before the 6th century AD retroactively given the title of Emperor, a title that did not exist in Japan back then. This was done to hide the Yayoi kingdoms like Na, Yamatai and Kuna which were tributaries of Han and Cao Wei dynasties of China and paid tribute including Japanese slaves to China. Japan even falsely claimed Kofuns were tombs of ancestors of the current Japanese monarchs, when there is no proof they reigned before the 6th century.
 
Also, documented history after the 6th century AD shows a record of treachery and deceit. Prince Ōama (called Emperor Tenmu in Japan) overthrew the rightful monarch, his nephew Ōtomo in the Jinshin war and took his throne.
 
The Japanese Northern Court emperors lied to the Southern Court Emperors promising to alternate the throne to them, but when the Northern Court were given the throne, they reneged on their word and kept the throne for their own branch to this day.
 
Hideyoshi killed his own nephew and his family after initially promising him the throne, after his own son was born. Tokugawa Ieyasu then backstabbed Hideyoshi's son and betrayed him in turn.
 
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso literally made up fake history when talking to foreign diplomats as justification for his government policy towards China, like claiming Japan was never tributary of China, that Japan's current family ruled for over 2,000 years.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1777912356 user_id=116835]
Japan literally burned the majority of military documents in August 1945 as it was waiting for American troops to land in Japan for their surrender. And the firebombing of Japan and battle of Okinawa destroyed the majority of documents registering entire Japanese families (which were wiped out in the firebombings and battle) so the families of the dead soldiers no longer existent in Japanese records either.
 
Secondly, the battle of Jolo involved both Americans and Moros against Japanese, what you meant to say is in battles SOLELY involving Americans there is no dispute on casualties, American accounts of Jolo mention Moro gueillas which Senshi Sosho ignores.
 
The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare directly contradicted the Japanese Defence Ministry's number of dead in battle of Jolo (that was published in Senshi Sosho). It was not only Fujioka Akiyoshi's diary which contradicted them. The number of Japanese troops on Jolo according to Japan's defence ministry is thousands less than the number of Japanese dead given by the Ministry of Health and Welfare.
 
[quote]238. The Bōeichō senshishitsu (Defense Agency Military History Room), Shō-gō rikugunsakusen (2), numbers the force of arms at the time of the American invasion at a small 3,425 men, with the Independent Combined 55th Brigade (the Suga Brigade) as its nucleus (645). Yet according to Ministry of Health and Welfare sources the number of those who died in battle on Jolo Island during the Asia-Pacific War was 6,030. 
[/quote]
 
There's no controversy regarding the Japanese death toll regarding battles solely fought against Americans, exactly for the reason I mentioned that Senshi Sosho's lies doesn't match up with any Japanese first hand accounts of the battle of Jolo (where Moros fought in the entire first half of the battle and Americans then entered the battle after)
 
Senshi Sosho literally falsely attributed the entire Japanese defeat at the battle of Jolo to Americans, instead of the Moro Muslim mujahideen who were armed with spears, arrows, machetes and rifles.
 
Senshi Sosho was written while Japan was under US military occupation with US military bases and US still has military bases in Japan, and the Japanese LDP regime served the American agenda in the Cold War and continues to do it today.
 
Americans are white, are technologically superior to Japanese, so Japanese ultra nationalists with an inferiority complex, like those who run the Japanese government after 1945, do not regard it as humiliation to lose to the white man and do not dare contradict American accounts or America will internationally humiliate Japan for lying. Japan makes cartoons about the battle of Peleliu while refusing to make them about the battle of Jolo since they don't regard it as humiliating to lose to the west.
 
Japan admitted to losing more dead to Americans, since Americans are white and technologically superior, Meiji Japan destroyed its own culture to imitate westerners and wear western uniforms, wear western hairstyles and destroyed Japanese castles, temples and shrines.
 
Japan's government gave a medal to Curtis LeMay who fired bombed and burned hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians alive.
 
The same Japanese LDP regime which did this, insults and attacks all its Asian neighbours all the time, who Japanese claim to be superior to, Shinzo Abe took a picture in a plane with the number 731 while he would never dare insult or attack America.
 
Japan regards it as humiliation that Moro Muslims hacked Japanese to death with machetes (both at Jolo and Tamparan) and massacred 99% of entire Japanese army units.
 
Japan's official museums propagate the lie that Japanese were welcomed by the "backwards" "colonised" people of Southeast Asia and "freed" them from western colonial rule (while Indonesia and Philippines today are American vassals and America was planning to give its Philippine puppets independence by 1945 already)
 
Japan cannot even give a correct consistent toll for the firebombing deaths in Tokyo (which LDP downplayed to make it seem as though Japan wouldn't suffer in another war again). The Tokyo Fire Department gave a different number than the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department.
 
[quote]The US Strategic Bombing Survey later estimated that nearly 88,000 people died, 41,000 were injured, and over a million residents lost their homes in the 9–10 March raid alone. The Tokyo Fire Department estimated a higher death toll of 97,000 killed and 125,000 wounded. The Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department established a figure of 83,793 dead, 40,918 wounded, and 286,358 buildings and homes destroyed.[29] Historian Richard Rhodes placed the death toll at over 100,000, injuries at a million, and homeless residents at a million.[30] These casualty and damage figures could be low, according to Mark Selden:
 
The figure of roughly 100,000 deaths, provided by Japanese and American authorities, both of whom may have had reasons of their own for minimizing the death toll, seems to be arguably low in light of population density, wind conditions, and survivors' accounts. With an average of 103,000 inhabitants per square mile (400 inhabitants/ha) and peak levels as high as 135,000 inhabitants per square mile (520 inhabitants/ha), the highest density of any industrial city in the world, and with firefighting measures ludicrously inadequate to the task, 15.8 square miles (41 km2) of Tokyo were destroyed on a night when fierce winds whipped the flames and walls of fire blocked tens of thousands fleeing for their lives. An estimated 1.5 million people lived in the burned out areas.[29]
 
In his 1968 book, reprinted in 1990, historian Gabriel Kolko cited a figure of 125,000 deaths.[31] Elise K. Tipton, a professor of Japan Studies, arrived at a rough range of 75,000 to 200,000 deaths.[32] Donald L. Miller, citing Knox Burger, stated that there were "at least 100,000" Japanese deaths and "about one million" injured.[33][/quote]
 
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso publicly repeatedly the lie that Japan's current monarchy ruled for 2000 years and falsely claimed Japanese were never tributaries of China in that time and were always hostile and resisted China (The Japanese Yayoi Kingdoms of Na and Yamatai were submissive vassal tributaries of Han dynasty China and Cao Wei dynasty of China) Queen Himiko and Iyo of Yamatai sent Japanese slaves to Cao Wei China as tribute, and the Japanese King of Na accepted a gold seal from Han dynasty China that insulted him as King of the Slave kingdom of the Dwarves. The Japanese kings let Chinese envoys name their kingdoms with insults like Na (slave) and Kuna (dog slave).
 
And EVERY single Japanese war diary and testimony from Mindanao mentions hostility of the Moro Muslims from Japanese.
 
Japanese war criminal medic Akira Makino admitted the Moro Muslims hated Japanese and attacked Japanese in interviews to the media.
 
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/11/06/2003386494
 
[quote]Makino, a low-ranked medic deployed to a Philippine island during the final years of World War II, began making his striking statements on Japanese war atrocities in public just last year.
 
He was regarded as the first former Japanese soldier to have been stationed in the Philippines to speak of experimenting on live hostages and his remarks caused some controversy as historical memory remains a point of simmering friction between Japan and the countries it invaded.
 
Nationalist Internet sites launched a campaign branding Makino a liar.[/quote]
 
[quote]Soon after arriving at the Japanese military base at Zamboanga on the western tip of Mindanao, Makino found himself and his unit cut off from headquarters, with the situation growing worse by the day.
 
They received no military supplies or orders, let alone medical packages.
 
The main enemy facing the small Japanese squad were the guerrilla bands formed by local Muslim Moros, who constantly threatened their station, he said.
 
"We were told the Moros were such cruel people that they attacked enemies with spears and we actually rescued some people assaulted by them," Makino said. "I was told many times I should not walk in the palm tree jungle after dark."[/quote]
 
American soldiers photographed Moro guerillas on Jolo island who were fighting against Japanese for an entire year since 1944 before the Americans landed there on 9-10 April 1945, the same Moro fighters that Senshi Sosho pretends never existed. 
 
https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AM6AD5JXGSCC628Z
 
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-C-SPhilippines/index.html
https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=27
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/1445686402252875/
 
There's no dispute on casualties involving the battle of Zamboanga because that was mostly Americans unlike Jolo, so Japan doesn't dare distort the casualty numbers.
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1462909890582137/posts/1694201984119592/
https://zamboanga.com/history/history_zamboanga_city_World_War_II.htm?fbclid=IwY2xjawRlp04BHUKi8WpQ45j1fTDKS69AcKdndgoLDnccCYkpcG_DE-4jy8GuDoguCAVtCA
 
Moro Muslims fought Spain for centuries defeating the Spanish attempts to conquer them, and fought the Americans in the early 20th century, before fighting the Japanese again, and this humiliated Japan, which falsely claimed it was saving Southeast Asians from western imperialism, but instead the true anti-imperialists slaughtered the Japanese.
 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/857239070986850/posts/2476162465761161/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/memoriesoldmanila/posts/3069637503191082/
 
This is the title of a collection of testimonies by the small number of Japanese soldiers who survived in Mindanao, including from the battle of Tamparan where Maranao Moro Muslims slaughtered most of a Japanese unit on 11-12 September 1942 with bolo machetes and keris daggers.
Kyo-10621 Butai, Seikansha no Shuki: Sensensoki (Memoirs of survivors: memories of the battle line), private printing, 1973.
 
據一○六二一部隊『生還者の手記戦線想起』一九七三年がある。
 
10621 部隊編『生還者の手記:戦線想起』 1977 年、 39 頁。
 
Meanwhile, Senshi Sosho pretends the battle of Mindanao and Sulu were with the Americans with no Moros involved.
 
Japan claimed no Japanese ever surrendered in China, meanwhile there's literal videos and pictures of Japanese POWs from Changsha 1942 and Changde 1943 and the officer interrogated by Americans in 1944 was captured by China.
 
The Japanese POW testimony in 1944 and the Japanese war diary which both mentioned mass illness among Japanese soldiers in the Zhejiang campaign of 1942, were written by two completely different people who never met each other. Either Japanese nationalists will claim this is just a coincidence or a conspiracy by China that has magic spells that could mind control Japanese into writing lies.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1777848283 user_id=116835]
The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare directly contradicted the Japanese Defence Ministry's number of dead in battle of Jolo (that was published in Senshi Sosho). It was not only Fujioka Akiyoshi's diary which contradicted them. The number of Japanese troops on Jolo according to Japan's defence ministry is thousands less than the number of Japanese dead given by the Ministry of Health and Welfare.
 
[quote]238. The Bōeichō senshishitsu (Defense Agency Military History Room), Shō-gō rikugunsakusen (2), numbers the force of arms at the time of the American invasion at a small 3,425 men, with the Independent Combined 55th Brigade (the Suga Brigade) as its nucleus (645). Yet according to Ministry of Health and Welfare sources the number of those who died in battle on Jolo Island during the Asia-Pacific War was 6,030. 
[/quote]
 
There's no controversy regarding the Japanese death toll regarding battles solely fought against Americans, exactly for the reason I mentioned that Senshi Sosho's lies doesn't match up with any Japanese first hand accounts of the battle of Jolo (where Moros fought in the entire first half of the battle and Americans then entered the battle after)
 
Senshi Sosho literally falsely attributed the entire Japanese defeat at the battle of Jolo to Americans, instead of the Moro Muslim mujahideen who were armed with spears, arrows, machetes and rifles.
 
Senshi Sosho was written while Japan was under US military occupation with US military bases and US still has military bases in Japan, and the Japanese LDP regime served the American agenda in the Cold War and continues to do it today.
 
Americans are white, are technologically superior to Japanese, so Japanese ultra nationalists with an inferiority complex, like those who run the Japanese government after 1945, do not regard it as humiliation to lose to the white man and do not dare contradict American accounts or America will internationally humiliate Japan for lying. Japan makes cartoons about the battle of Peleliu while refusing to make them about the battle of Jolo since they don't regard it as humiliating to lose to the west.
 
Japan admitted to losing more dead to Americans, since Americans are white and technologically superior, Meiji Japan destroyed its own culture to imitate westerners and wear western uniforms, wear western hairstyles and destroyed Japanese castles, temples and shrines. J
 
Japan's government gave a medal to Curtis LeMay who fired bombed and burned hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians alive.
 
The same Japanese LDP regime which did this, insults and attacks all its Asian neighbours all the time, who Japanese claim to be superior to, Shinzo Abe took a picture in a plane with the number 731 while he would never dare insult or attack America.
 
Japan regards it as humiliation that Moro Muslims hacked Japanese to death with machetes (both at Jolo and Tamparan) and massacred 99% of entire Japanese army units.
 
Japan's official museums propagate the lie that Japanese were welcomed by the "backwards" "colonised" people of Southeast Asia and "freed" them from western colonial rule (while Indonesia and Philippines today are American vassals and America was planning to give its Philippine puppets independence by 1945 already)
 
Japan cannot even give a correct consistent toll for the firebombing deaths in Tokyo (which LDP downplayed to make it seem as though Japan wouldn't suffer in another war again). The Tokyo Fire Department gave a different number than the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department.
 
[quote]The US Strategic Bombing Survey later estimated that nearly 88,000 people died, 41,000 were injured, and over a million residents lost their homes in the 9–10 March raid alone. The Tokyo Fire Department estimated a higher death toll of 97,000 killed and 125,000 wounded. The Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department established a figure of 83,793 dead, 40,918 wounded, and 286,358 buildings and homes destroyed.[29] Historian Richard Rhodes placed the death toll at over 100,000, injuries at a million, and homeless residents at a million.[30] These casualty and damage figures could be low, according to Mark Selden:
 
The figure of roughly 100,000 deaths, provided by Japanese and American authorities, both of whom may have had reasons of their own for minimizing the death toll, seems to be arguably low in light of population density, wind conditions, and survivors' accounts. With an average of 103,000 inhabitants per square mile (400 inhabitants/ha) and peak levels as high as 135,000 inhabitants per square mile (520 inhabitants/ha), the highest density of any industrial city in the world, and with firefighting measures ludicrously inadequate to the task, 15.8 square miles (41 km2) of Tokyo were destroyed on a night when fierce winds whipped the flames and walls of fire blocked tens of thousands fleeing for their lives. An estimated 1.5 million people lived in the burned out areas.[29]
 
In his 1968 book, reprinted in 1990, historian Gabriel Kolko cited a figure of 125,000 deaths.[31] Elise K. Tipton, a professor of Japan Studies, arrived at a rough range of 75,000 to 200,000 deaths.[32] Donald L. Miller, citing Knox Burger, stated that there were "at least 100,000" Japanese deaths and "about one million" injured.[33][/quote]
 
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso publicly repeatedly the lie that Japan's current monarchy ruled for 2000 years and falsely claimed Japanese were never tributaries of China in that time and were always hostile and resisted China (The Japanese Yayoi Kingdoms of Na and Yamatai were submissive vassal tributaries of Han dynasty China and Cao Wei dynasty of China) Queen Himiko and Iyo of Yamatai sent Japanese slaves to Cao Wei China as tribute, and the Japanese King of Na accepted a gold seal from Han dynasty China that insulted him as King of the Slave kingdom of the Dwarves. The Japanese kings let Chinese envoys name their kingdoms with insults like Na (slave) and Kuna (dog slave).
 
And EVERY single Japanese war diary and testimony from Mindanao mentions hostility of the Moro Muslims from Japanese.
 
Japanese war criminal medic Akira Makino admitted the Moro Muslims hated Japanese and attacked Japanese in interviews to the media.
 
This is the title of a collection of testimonies by the small number of Japanese soldiers who survived in Mindanao, including from the battle of Tamparan where Maranao Moro Muslims slaughtered most of a Japanese unit on 11-12 September 1942 with bolo machetes and keris daggers.
Kyo-10621 Butai, Seikansha no Shuki: Sensensoki (Memoirs of survivors: memories of the battle line), private printing, 1973.
 
據一○六二一部隊『生還者の手記戦線想起』一九七三年がある。
 
10621 部隊編『生還者の手記:戦線想起』 1977 年、 39 頁。
 
Meanwhile, Senshi Sosho pretends the battle of Mindanao and Sulu were with the Americans with no Moros involved.
[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1777833772 user_id=116835]
Japanese soldiers also directly killed, tortured and raped Vietnamese in 1944-1945, and not merely starved them to death.
 
North Vietnam used to talk about Japanese raping & torture of Vietnamese back in 1970 when they had bad relations with Japan.
 
Truong Chinh, chairman of the National Assembly of North Vietnam published this article "Policy of the Japanese Pirates Towards Our people" in Nhan Dan paper, in Hanoi in Vietnamese on 17 August 1970, translated into English in 1971 by the U.S. Joint Publications Research Service.
 
It talks about the tortures, rapes and killings Japanese inflicted upon Vietnamese people , particularly north Vietnam in 1944-1945.
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sTrcAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA2-PA10
 
When Vietnam started begging Japan for investment and aid after 1975, they started downplaying the rapes & tortures, and only mentioned the famine, and even then they started downplaying the famine.
 
 
 
https://hung-viet.org/a5222/doi-thoai-nam-2000
 
[quote]Vì vụ hội thảo Gia Long không giải quyết dứt điểm nên mới nẩy nòi ra hội thảo Việt Nhật. Sự xâm lược của phát xít Nhật lại biến thành "sự hiện diện của người Nhật". Hai triệu người chết đói năm 45, cả thế giới đều biết, mà chính các sử gia chân chính của Nhật Bản phải viết thành sách để xác nhận và tố cáo tội ác này. Và chính một giáo sư Nhật - giáo sư Furuta Moto - đã hợp tác với giáo sư Văn Tạo bỏ ra mấy năm liền đi điều tra thực địa, khảo sát 314 hồ sơ tội ác để viết thành 1 cuốn sách 732 trang về "Nạn giết hại 2 triệu người Việt Nam, xảy ra ở thế kỷ XX này, đó là một nỗi nhục của nhân loại" (Trích thư tay của giáo sư Furuta Motoo).
 
Những người nghiên cứu khoa học có lương tâm, có ý thức tôn trọng lịch sử và chân lý thì nghiên cứu và viết như thế đó !
 
Thế mà ông giáo sư Mạc Đường - lúc bấy giờ là Viện trưởng Viện KHXH tại TPHCM lại định hướng và chỉ đạo cho ông tiến sĩ Đinh Văn Liên - giám đốc Trung tâm Sử học cùng với một số giáo sư, học giả, tổ chức hẳn một hội thảo cấp quốc tế để hóa phép hơn hai triệu đồng bào chết đói thành còn "hơn một triệu" Viện trợ của Nhật cho ngụy quyền Sài Gòn lại biến thành viện trợ nhân đạo cho nhân dân miền Nam Việt Nam, cuộc kháng chiến chống Mỹ cứu nước lại được phù phép thành "cuộc nội chiến".
 
[/quote]
 
[quote]Because the Gia Long seminar was not conclusively resolved, the Vietnam-Japan seminar emerged as a consequence. The invasion of the Japanese fascists was transformed into a mere "Japanese presence." Two million people died of starvation in '45—a fact known to the entire world—which authentic Japanese historians themselves had to document in books to confirm and denounce this crime.In fact, a Japanese professor—Professor Furuta Motoo—collaborated with Professor Van Tao, spending several years conducting field investigations and surveying 314 crime dossiers to write a 732-page book about "The killing of 2 million Vietnamese people, occurring in this 20th century, which is a disgrace to humanity" (Excerpt from a handwritten letter by Professor Furuta Motoo).
 
That is how researchers with a conscience and a sense of respect for history and the truth study and write!
 
Yet, Professor Mac Duong—who was then the Director of the Institute of Social Sciences in Ho Chi Minh City—directed and instructed Dr Dinh Van Lien, Director of the History Centre, along with several professors and scholars, to organise an entire international seminar to "conjure away" the more than two million compatriots who died of starvation, reducing the figure to "over one million." Japanese aid to the Saigon puppet regime was transformed into humanitarian aid for the people of South Vietnam, and the Resistance War against America to Save the Nation was magically turned into a "civil war."[/quote]
 
 
Vietnamese women were married off to Japanese soldiers after the war and gave birth to half Japanese children which are still in Vietnam today.
 
https://indomemoires.hypotheses.org/23318
 
https://consent.yahoo.com/v2/collectConsent?sessionId=3_cc-session_b6fd871c-71fe-484d-834e-ab891daf724a
 
This is the same in other Southeast Asian countries like Indonesia, Malaysia.
 
Japanese tortured, raped and killed Indonesian Muslims and used the men as forced labour and raped Indonesian Muslim girls.
 
Japanese also raped Malay Muslim girls and Malaysian Indians, and did not only target Chinese, contrary to myth. Malayan Chinese were targeted in initial massacres due to their presence in guerilla units, but Japanese raped girls of all ethnicities in Malaya including Malay Muslim girls, and used the men as forced labour.
 
But the Indonesian government was made out of collaborators with Japan, so they downplayed Japanese atrocities on their own people.
 
And Malaysian UMNO senior leaders under Najib Razak downplayed the Japanese rapes against Malay Muslims due to sheer cowardice, refusing to demand reparations from the Japanese, when junior Malay UMNO ministers like Mustapha Yakuub wanted reparations from Japan over rapes against Malay Muslim women. Razak forced Yaakub to stop his demands against Japan for reparations and collection of testimonies from Malay girls who were raped by Japanese.
 
China is the only country in WW2 where it was Japanese girls and women settlers who were left behind in China in 1945, the Zanryu fujin, who were married off to Chinese men.
 
Meanwhile, many stranded Japanese soldiers in Vietnam & Indonesia, married Vietnamese women and Indonesian native women, after torturing, raping and killing Vietnamese, and fathered children which remained behind in Vietnam and Indonesia.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1763930733 user_id=116835]
Its notable that Japanese soldiers had to try to force Japanese women to commit suicide during the Soviet invasion of Manchukuo and South Sakhalin and Kuril islands, unlike in China where women voluntarily committed suicide to avoid rape or after rape (because neo-Confucianism in Chinese culture condemned breaches of women's chastity and condemned the marriage of violated women to men, and condemned rapebabies, unlike Japanese commoner culture).
 
Japanese tried to present their own sexually liberal Yamato Japanese people as conservative neo-Confucianists like Han Chinese are, but failed to indoctrinate their own commoner population. In Edo period Japan, Japan's Tokugawa regime tried to copy China's neo-Confucianist culture, where Chinese men and women wouldn't even bathe with male strangers of the opposite sex, by mandating sex segregated baths, but Japanese commoners ignored this attempt and Japanese women bathed with male strangers who were not their husbands and brothers and had illicit relations with them.
 
Meanwhile Han Chinese women segregated themselves from unrelated men of the opposite sex in pre-modern China, unlike Japan.
 
In 1945 in Manchukuo during the Soviet attack in Operation August Storm, a Japanese nurse Ito Ikuko who later married a Chinese soldier, said she and other Japanese nurses and wounded soldiers had to be forced to enter a river to drown, they didn't want to to commit suicide. She survived the attempted forced suicide murder. She said she didn't want to commit suicide and clung and fought for her life in the river, she didn't consider the possibility that a non-Japanese man might rape her as a stain on her reputation. Other Japanese were forcibly given injections to kill them against their will.
 
https://k.sina.cn/article_5819496043_15ade766b001006g4z.html
 
I posted links about Japanese soldiers forcibly injecting their own nurses with creosote in the Philippines before Americans overran their positions, and in Okinawa and Saipan, Japanese soldiers forced both Yamato and Okinawan women and children to jump of cliffs, when they didn't want to.
 
Japanese propagandists came up with bogus stories about Japanese women in South Sakhalin voluntarily killing themselves to avoid Soviet rape. What happened in Manchukuo and North Korea exposed their lies, because majority of Japanese girls and women in those places refused to commit suicide and openly accused the Japanese army of trying to force them to kill themselves when they didn't want to.
 
The majority of Japanese girls and women in Manchukuo and North Korea in fact did not commit suicide, and were then raped by Soviets and Chinese civilians, and then when they returned to Japan, they lied to Japanese men and said they were virgins and married them. Many Japanese today have grandmothers who were raped by Soviets and Chinese men.
 
And many Japanese girls and women were taken as wives by Chinese farmers, the zanryu fujin. And then they returned to Japan with their Chinese fathered children after 1972, and some changed their children's surnames from their Chinese surnames to their own Japanese surnames and hid the identity of their Chinese fathered children, so Japanese would not know they are Chinese fathered. They are assimilating into the Japanese Yamato population.
 
Meanwhile in China, tens of thousands of Chinese women killed themselves voluntarily in Nanjing in 1937 and in the villages around Hengyang in 1944. There were rivers and ponds filled with women's and girl's corpses, not forced in there by the Chinese army, but the Chinese girls and women drowned themselves. (and the Japanese soldiers anyway killed the majority of women they raped in Nanjing after the rape, and the minority of women left alive then committed suicide) and the minority of women who didn't, aborted the fetuses. Even Iris Chang noted rivers around Nanjing filled with women's corpses after suicide. People around Hengyang saw ponds and rivers full of women floating.
 
[quote]"Between 1937 and 1938 a German diplomat reported that "uncounted" Chinese women were taking their own lives by flinging themselves into the Yangtze river"
[/quote]
 
[quote]Countless women have drowned themselves in the river or otherwise committed suicide.
 
Suping Lu 2019 "The 1937 – 1938 Nanjing Atrocities" p. 360[/quote]
 
[quote]广塘村及附近村子多名妇女被奸污后或跳河自尽或精神失常走失,附近池塘水坝经常出现溺水女尸[58]
 
李, 岳平. 衡阳战乱逃难见闻-刘隆祥. 衡阳抗战铸名城. 中国文史出版社. 2005: 776. ISBN 7503417110.
 
After being raped, many women in Guangtang Village and nearby villages either jumped into the river to commit suicide or went missing due to mental illness. Drowned female corpses were frequently found in nearby ponds and dams .
 
Li, Yueping. My Experiences Fleeing from the War in Hengyang - Liu Longxiang. Hengyang: A City Forged in the War of Resistance. China Literature and History Press. 2005: 776. ISBN 7503417110 .[/quote]
 
The reason that the estimates of rapes in Nanjing is ranging from 20,000 to 80,000 is because the majority of the rape victims were killed after the rape and committed suicide, which is why the 80,000 number exists. The 80,000 number is basically counting all dead women and girls in Nanjing as rape victims, counting all the corpses instead of only documented cases.
 
An American sociologist in Nanjing said that the minority of women who survived and didn't commit suicide, aborted and choked the fetuses to death or drowned them.
 
in Chinese neo-Confucian conservative culture, a rapebaby is abhorred, and so is a violated woman even if she didn't become pregnant. Even single mothers who gave birth to bastards through voluntary intercourse are abhorred, like if a Chinese woman had illicit voluntary sex with even other Chinese out of wedlock and gave birth as a single mother she would be despised. The bastard child who didn't know his father would be mocked in public along with his mother by everyone around them and nobody arrange for them to marry their own children, its a massive stigma and red flag to be a single mother in China. Unlike in Japanese commoner culture, where adultery and extramarital sex like from yobai night crawling is regarded as normal and a single mother raising a single child was normal.
 
This meant that many women and girls killed themselves before or after rape or immediately drowned any rape produced fetuses to death, because in 1940s China, most people married locally in their own village and neighbourhood in their city, and everyone in that village or neighbourhood knew each other and their families, and they would know who gave birth out of wedlock and who got raped, unlike in the modern Australia or America or Canada where single mothers are normal and women can move to another province or state across the country, and nobody questions it or asks about her background or her baby's origin. Marriages in 1940s China were arranged within a village and few men would accept a non-virgin, a woman and man's reputation and her family background were all important in Chinese marriages. Even up to the 1980s, Chinese commoners refused to do mixed bathes in public, in the 1960s supposedly "progressive" "communist" Han students who were put in Tibetan areas, were shocked at Tibetan girls and boys bathing with each other and the supposedly "progressive" "feminist" Han students thought they were indecent girls.
 
A man would also know if his wife was raped (in conservative Confucian Chinese culture, a man secludes his wife under his supervision in the home all the time normally, and he would be seen as a cuck if he let her out with other men) and he would know if his wife was kidnapped or seized, and Chinese are massive practitioners of infanticide for bastard children. (abortion within marriage for a child conceived between husband and wife was condemned in traditional Chinese law, but not for children conceived outside of marriage). Despite Chiang Kai-shek's attempt at liberalising China and introducing modernist western values, he failed at the time.
 
700,000 out of Nanjing's 1,000,000 pre-war population fled west to Sichuan in 1937. Only 300,000 people remained in Nanjing in December 1937 The majority of women and girls left behind were either killed during the rapes and the rest mostly committed suicide by drowning after or drowned all resulting fetuses.
 
After the war in 1945, 700,000 Nanjing residents returned to Nanjing from Sichuan and other occupied parts of China, and resettled Nanjing. Those are the ancestors of modern Nanjing residents. None of the people who live in Nanjing today have grandmothers who were raped.
 
In Hengyang city, the entire population was evacuated in 1944 to unoccupied parts of China and many villagers around the city fled too. They returned in 1945 after the war was over. None of the people who live in Hengyang today have grandmothers who were raped.
 
This is unlike the Japanese people, where Japanese girls and women who were raped concealed their rapes by non-Japanese men and then married Japanese men, and Japanese zanryu fujin conceal the origin of their Chinese fathered children.
 
In China, the female death toll matches or even surpasses the male death toll in WW2, Chinese women were mostly killed after rape or killed themselves. Chinese women are included as part of the the death toll of China in WW2.
 
While in Manchukuo in 1945, the Japanese male death toll surpassed the Japanese female death toll. Japanese girls and women survived at a far greater number after being gang raped or taken as wives by Chinese men, while most Japanese males were violently killed, starved or worked to death in gulags.
 
Chinese girls and women voluntarily killed themselves due to rape or would voluntarily take abortions for rape. Japanese girls and women would have to have forced suicides and forced abortions by Japanese men, and they would avoid doing it if they could. Japanese girls and women themselves said they didn't want to commit suicide and didn't want forced abortions. Japan could not abort the grown up children of the Zanryu fujin who were fathered by Chinese men and who came to Japan after 1972.
 
Many Japanese alive today are born of grandmothers who were raped by Soviet soldiers, Chinese civilian men and from Japanese girls who serviced American soldiers in the Recreation and Amusement association.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1763420723 user_id=116835]
[quote=limited post_id=2603439 time=1762905861 user_id=116835]
English translation of Japanese text provided.
 
Soviet troops raped Japanese females of all ages ranging from 12 year old girls to women in their seventies in the streets.
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8QoOEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA57
 
[quote]Ì日本人居留民に対するソ連軍の蛮行は、凄まじいものがありました。
それが12歳であろうと70歳近い老婆であろうと。
 
そして、人前でも白昼でも堂々と、また雪の上であろうと、そういうことは全く頓着しなかった。
 
女性たちは頭は丸坊主になり、顔に墨を塗り、男装して難を逃れようとしたが、彼らは一人一人旨を触って女であることを確かめると引き立てていった。(「戦後引き揚げの記録」岩槻泰雄著)
[/quote]
 
 
[quote]The atrocities committed by the Soviet army against Japanese residents were horrific. Whether it's a 12-year-old or an elderly woman in her 70s.
 
And he didn't care at all about doing it in public, in broad daylight, or even on the snow.
 
The women tried to escape danger by shaving their heads, smearing ink on their faces, and disguising themselves as men, but the men touched each of them one by one to confirm that they were women and then removed them. ("Records of Repatriation After the War" by Yasuo Iwatsuki)
 
戦後引揚げの記録
 
Sengo hikiage no kiroku[/quote]
 
 
 
Video thumb

 
[quote]
戦友の塔
 
1967年10月
 
その残虐さは他に類を見ず、白昼堂々、女性を集団で襲って
強姦するといつ地獄絵図が各地で繰り広げられたという。
4:55 / 10:04
 
「アンブロークン」が触れない連合軍による強姦、捕虜殺害、死体損壊
[/quote]
 
[quote]In Manchuria, Soviet troops are committing atrocities against Japanese women.
The atrocities were unparalleled, and hellish pictures of women being attacked and raped in groups in broad daylight unfolded in many places.
 
Tower of Comrades
 
October 1967
 
The brutality of the attacks was unparalleled, with women being attacked and raped in broad daylight by groups, creating hellish scenes that unfolded across the country.
4:55 / 10:04
 
"Unbroken" doesn't touch on the rape, murder of prisoners, and mutilation of corpses committed by Allied forces.[/quote]
 
https://x.com/miuprostituee/status/1677469340671823872
 
[quote]RAAって知らない人が多いみたいね。
WW2終結後、米軍専用の慰安婦を提供した施設
 
終戦直後の1945年8月18日に、政府が全国の知事に命じた。東京は、警視庁主導で、慰安婦施設が作られ、
料亭などの施設を借り上げて造られた
 
それらの施設の中で、多くの日本人女性が暴行を受け続けた
[/quote]
 
[quote]It seems like many people don't know about the RAA.
 
It was a facility that provided comfort women exclusively for the U.S. military after the end of World War II.
 
On August 18, 1945, immediately after the end of the war, the government issued an order to governors across the country. In Tokyo, comfort women facilities were established under the leadership of the Metropolitan Police Department.
 
They were built in rented facilities such as traditional Japanese restaurants.
 
Many Japanese women were subjected to repeated assaults in these facilities.[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1763420645 user_id=116835]
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/523.html
https://www.awf.or.jp/pdf/0062_p061_088.pdf
https://hokke-ookami.hatenablog.com/entry/20171125/1511667837
 
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/524.html
 
https://www.awf.or.jp/pdf/g0052-1.pdf
 
https://asahi.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1519793418/
https://lpt.c.yimg.jp/amd/20180227-00000029-cnippou-000-view.jpg
http://jump.5ch.net/?https://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20180227-00000029-cnippou-kr
 
http://www.asyura2.com/17/warb21/msg/711.html
 
http://www.asyura2.com/acat/d/d0/d0n/d0N3SUM5UUdjdWs=/100000.html
https://vergil.hateblo.jp/entry/2023/04/20/191142
http://www.asyura2.com/21/reki7/msg/107.html
 
 
https://info-rekininken.tokyo/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/c8a4d0a230e02617b1fca8e538c710a1.pdf
 
 
 
 
https://hpmm-db.jp/shared/pdf/sensai0.pdf
https://melisenda59.rssing.com/chan-37373428/all_p5.html
 
hiroshima
 
https://hpmmuseum.jp/modules/xelfinder/index.php/view/2418/motomachi__booklet2007-2022.pdf
 
tengchong walls japanese women comfort
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DLklEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA127#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WLB5EQAAQBAJ&pg=PA144
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HDyFAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA190
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OI1_EQAAQBAJ&pg=PA101https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PzAEEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA286
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fTvvDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT57
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bqpjEQAAQBAJ&pg=PT94
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lDcRBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT222
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6k_VDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT133
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dUVWAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA53
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1763420357 user_id=116835]
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/523.html
https://www.awf.or.jp/pdf/0062_p061_088.pdf
https://hokke-ookami.hatenablog.com/entry/20171125/1511667837
 
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/524.html
 
https://www.awf.or.jp/pdf/g0052-1.pdf
 
https://asahi.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1519793418/
https://lpt.c.yimg.jp/amd/20180227-00000029-cnippou-000-view.jpg
http://jump.5ch.net/?https://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20180227-00000029-cnippou-kr
 
http://www.asyura2.com/17/warb21/msg/711.html
 
http://www.asyura2.com/acat/d/d0/d0n/d0N3SUM5UUdjdWs=/100000.html
https://vergil.hateblo.jp/entry/2023/04/20/191142
http://www.asyura2.com/21/reki7/msg/107.html
 
 
https://info-rekininken.tokyo/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/c8a4d0a230e02617b1fca8e538c710a1.pdf
 
 
 
 
https://hpmm-db.jp/shared/pdf/sensai0.pdf
https://melisenda59.rssing.com/chan-37373428/all_p5.html
 
hiroshima
 
https://hpmmuseum.jp/modules/xelfinder/index.php/view/2418/motomachi__booklet2007-2022.pdf
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1763417679 user_id=116835]
[quote=limited post_id=2601626 time=1761605018 user_id=116835]
[quote=asiaticus post_id=923651 time=1152324782 user_id=8086]
[quote]
[quote]asiaticus wrote: 
BTW what is the source of those casuality numbers?  [/quote]
 
 
Senshi Sosho. Senshi Sosho was written according to IJA official reports. The casualities in the official reports are almost correct, because they were used for the affairs on fallen or wounded soldiers. [/quote]
 
Thanks for the confimation.  I though that might be the case. 
 
[quote]On the other hand, enemy losses are not reliable. They were always exaggerated. [/quote]
 
 
Sometimes the Chinese list the weapons captured, rifles and MGs and such and they usually are far lower in number than the Japanese manpower losses claimed but seem to be more in line with the losses of the Japanese reports.  They seem to have been more accurate about material losses than manpower losses.  I would guess that would be harder to fake, when you had to produce the weapons.  However in this case they seem to have really wandered off into fantasy land.  This Chinese history I have also doesnt report their own loss totals.  
 
I dont know if its the fault of these authors following some party line to make things look better than they were or a problem with reporting from the feild at the time to keep the higher ups happy.
[/quote]
 
Your reasoning using captured weapons isn't legitimate because the Japanese would place priority over seizing and retaining weapons of their dead troops over retrieving their corpses.
 
Japanese logistics were primitive compared to American logistics, and Japan needed to save every single bullet, rifle, cannon, tankette, car, truck and drop of fuel they could.
 
Japanese would take as many rifles and machine guns from their dead soldiers corpses as possible back with them. Japan used the captured arsenals in Shenyang and Taiyuan to manufacture weapons and ammunition and also used local weapons used by China due to poor logistics, they used abandoned Bofors cannons against British in Hong Kong. Japan placed priority on seizing and retrieving all weapons and material that they could from the battlefield, not corpses.
 
On the other hand, there was a lower priority for retrieving Japanese corpses. Sometimes Japanese would just cut off an arm or leg of their dead soldiers from Chinese battlefields to cremate and give the ash to their families instead of the whole body when they were under heavy fire and couldn't bring back the bodies, and sometimes they couldn't even retrieve the bodies, and just gave the families a box full of rocks or soil that they said came from the battlefield they died in.
 
So the Japanese, while retrieving their rifles, could figure out a rough estimate of the rifles they left behind (captured by Chinese forces) from counting number of rifles they brought back, and subtracting that from the total number of rifles they brought into battle.
 
Japan could then give a bogus minimised death toll roughly matching the number of rifles they knew that they had left behind and were unable to retrieve.
 
Thai people openly accuse Japan of lying about their casualties at the Prachuap Khiri Khan battle, saying the Japanese cremating nearly double the number of Japanese corpses on the beach than they admitting losing.
 
Japanese POWS interrogated by Americans openly admitted Japanese documents lied and minimised all unpleasant figures like their death tolls.
 
Official American reports on chemical weapons use for the Zaoyang-Yichang (Ichang) battle say the straw wearing Sichuan troops crushed the Japanese in Yichang in hand to hand combat and recaptured the city, but were overwhelmed with mustard gas and lewisite gas and were forced to withdraw.
 
There would have been a great slaughter of the Japanese soldiers in Yichang (Ichang) when the straw sandal wearing Sichuan troops stormed the city and recaptured the city from them in fierce hand to hand combat, before Japan bombarded them with mustard gas to take the city again.
 
And the Japanese military lied, and denied any Japanese soldiers were captured by China. Western reporters photographed Japanese prisoners of war in the third battle of Changsha in 1942 and in the battle of Changde in 1943, there were lines of Japanese POWs photographed, filmed and interrogated by western reporters and American officers at the battles.
 
China is the one that turned over the Japanese POW captured in 1944 to American interrogators, and the Japanese admitted Japan lied about their death tolls, downplaying them and they had killed their own soldiers with cholera in the 1942 Zhejiang campaign, and the death toll was far higher than the 1,700 he saw.
 
Japan claimed Japanese soldiers never surrendered. Senshi Sōsho doesn't acknowledge any Japanese captured in the 1942 Changsha and 1943 Changde battles.
 
So do you believe your own lying eyes and the photographs and footage of Japanese POWs taken by western journalists, or the you believe the IJA's reports and Senshi Sōsho which Akira Takizawa claims never lies?
 
https://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675040787_Chinese-troops_Japanese-troops_captured-equipment_ruined-city
 
Video thumb

 
Video thumb

 
https://collections.lib.uwm.edu/digital/collection/agsphoto/id/10127
 
https://www.britishpathe.com/asset/82591
 
Video thumb

 
Video thumb

 
https://dp.la/item/85d3ce3d8bb1e6765ad4df9b4d76fc7c
 
https://dp.la/item/9b71039bf8ca70d883ccba3ede00e9d4
 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/127906254@N06/23914444524/
 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/127906254@N06/24247080210/
 
https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C31431
 
https://www.awm.gov.au/wartime/95/article-four
 
https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2388590394616654&id=100064310515165
 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2097716363704060&id=129231143885935&set=a.134148893394160
 
 
[quote="Akira Takizawa" post_id=923595 time=1152309845 user_id=17949]
[quote="asiaticus"]BTW what is the source of those casuality numbers?[/quote]
Senshi Sosho. Senshi Sosho was written according to IJA official reports. The casualities in the official reports are almost correct, because they were used for the affairs on fallen or wounded soldiers.
 
On the other hand, enemy losses are not reliable. They were always exaggerated.
 
[quote="asiaticus"]It would be nice to be able to read a Japanese account of this campaign (and other campaigns in China) to get a sense of just what the Japanese intended to accomplish and what their understanding of what the events of the battle ment and how they reacted to them.[/quote]
I wish Senshi Sosho had been translated. I am irritated that Chinese propaganda is believed in the West.
 
 
Taki
[/quote]
 
There's photographs and film of Japanese POWs in 1942 at Changsha and 1943 at Changde, taken by western journalists. American officers interrogated Japanese POWs captured by China in 1944, one of whom admitted that Japan massacred their own soldiers in the 1942 Zhejiang bioweapons attack and covered up the true death toll, and lied about every unpleasant casualty figure.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=288257
 
Senshi Sōsho denies that a single Japanese soldier was captured by China in battle.
 
You know and you knew full well that Senshi Sōsho lies.
 
Shiro Ishii falsely reported the 1942 bioweapons attack against Jinhua in Zhejiang as a success, when he massacred Japanese soldiers with the diseases he spread.
 
Your museums in Japan claim that Japan was welcomed as a liberator in southeast Asia and "freed" the people from western colonialism.
 
Meanwhile, the diary of Japanese soldier Fujioka Akiyoshi says the Moro Muslims slaughtered the Japanese like pigs, Japanese rotting corpses were everywhere in Jolo, and he and the other Japanese survivors desperately tried to find the Americans to surrender to them.
 
Around 6,000 Japanese soldiers died in Jolo, Senshi Sōsho claims half that number of Japanese died. Senshi Sōsho claims the battle of Jolo only started when Americans landed, Fujioka Akiyoshi who was actually there says the battle started when Moros slaughtered Japanese when the Japanese first landed.
 
Indonesia is an American client state, its resources plundered by American companies, after America forced the Netherlands to leave (not Japan). Philippines is an American client state with its resources pillaged by America. America forced the Netherlands to give up Indonesia (After the Netherlands crushed and defeated the Indonesian independence forces). America even forced the Netherlands to give West Papua to Indonesia so American companies could plunder its resources under protection of the Indonesian army, the slave of America.
 
Japan gave the entire Indonesia from the Netherlands to America and enslaved all Southeast Asians to American domination.
 
Saudi men go to Indonesia to sleep with dozens of Indonesian women at a time. Japan delivered this entire land to America.
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1763417587 user_id=116835]
[quote=limited post_id=2603436 time=1762904264 user_id=116835]
A Japanese soldier's autobiography confirms the Japanese military lied and concealed its own accidental slaughter of their own soldiers with biological weapons in the 1942 Zhejiang Jiangxi campaign.
 
This Japanese soldier considers the Zhejiang campaign (claimed as a Japanese victory) to be a disaster for Japan due to the disease epidemic.
 
According to this autobiography, the Japanese military tried to deny that epidemic disease broke out among Japanese soldiers in the Zhejiang campaign of 1942, falsely claiming the disease was caused by malnutrition. The Japanese pacific war encyclopaedia Senshi Sōsho which Akira Takizawa falsely claims is reliable, mentions nothing about the incident and mass deaths among Japanese troops and falsely portrays the entire campaign as a success. The same encyclopaedia falsely claiming Japan only lost 400,000 dead in China.
 
This Japanese soldier also confirms the first three Japanese battles in Changsha as defeats for Japan, contrary to pro-Japanese hacks claiming the first three battles were "distractions" from somewhere else or "raids". If Japan had capture Changsha in any one of those three battles, it would have had a much more advantageous position to fight in Hengyang, with a prepared stock of tons of food supplies much closer to the frontline.
 
There's English translation under every Japanese text here.
 
https://fum-tan.sakura.ne.jp/Konan.htm
 
[quote]また日華事変開始以来、日本軍は揚子江以南に幾つかの作戦を展開している。が、長沙進攻3回および昭和17年の淅カン作戦、これらはいずれも惨憺たる結果に終わっているのである。何故か。
 その一因は陸軍がマラリア、アメーバ赤痢、コレラなどを主とする伝染病を制圧することができなかったからである。そして軍が行動すると必ずこれら伝染病が爆発的に流行したからである。今、言論自由の世の中だからはっきり言わして貰えば、初めから「負け戦」を戦ったのである。退却というのは体裁が悪いから、転進と称して引き返しただけではないか。ちょっと考えただけでも、湖南、江西の地方で大作戦を起こすのは衛生の面からも無謀だったのではないか。
 
 今次作戦のように補給線が寸断される、というよりはむしろ補給線が皆無の状態に立ち至るに及んではもはや悲劇というほかない。南方に通ずる補給線を作る作戦が、逆に補給線を断たれてしまったのだ。ミイラ取りがミイラになるの譬えはまさにこのことである。念のため、同様な経過をとった淅カン作戦について私の知れる範囲の事を述べる。昭和17年の淅カン作戦は、作戦名の通り淅江省と江西省を中心として展開された作戦である。この両省を西から東へ揚子江と平行に流れる川がある。富春江(下流は銭トウ江)といい杭州湾に注いでいる。折から雨季で流域は洪水(この川は数年に一度は洪水を起こすらしい)で、作戦は難渋することになった。難渋の原因は戦闘ではない。赤痢(アメーバ赤痢が主)とマラリアの蔓延であり、さらに後にはコレラまで流行して中国の占領地に広く伝播するに至ったのである。もちろん作戦は失敗である。
 
 時期は記憶していないが、その頃陸軍から「戦争栄養失調症」なる病名が提唱されたのである。派遣軍軍医部の説明によると、原因は悪条件の中で肉体的、精神的に極限まで奮戦した結果として、兵は消耗状態に陥り栄養失調症になったのであると。
 新しい病名の提唱とあれば内科学会としては黙っていられない。東大柿沼昊作教授を団長とする調査団が来て仔細に調査が行なわれた。その結果、陸軍の言うような栄養失調症なるものは見当たらず、ほとんどは慢性化したアメーバ赤痢やマラリアが基礎疾患として存在すると結論が出た。派遣軍軍医部としては面目を失墜する出来事であったが、これは世に公表された話ではない。済南陸軍病院の昼の会食(陸軍では部隊の将校が一堂に会して昼食を共にする習慣があった)の時に院長の高木千年軍医中佐が喋ったのである。軍医仲間でもほとんど知っている人が無かったことから推測すると、首脳部はなるべく口外したくない事実だったようだが、病院の一軍医が患者に「戦争栄養失調症」なる診断を下したのを院長が諌めたついでに、つい喋ってしまったことのようであった。しかし一度命名された「栄養失調症」なる病名は戦後の社会でも使われているようだ。(ただし別の意味で)[/quote]
 
[quote]
Since the start of the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese military has launched several operations south of the Yangtze River. However, the three Changsha campaigns and the Shih-Han campaign in 1942 all ended in disastrous results. Why?
 One reason was the army's inability to control infectious diseases, primarily malaria, amoebic dysentery, and cholera. And whenever the military took action, these diseases exploded. In today's world of free speech, I'll be frank: they fought a "losing battle" from the start. Retreat would be unflattering, so perhaps they simply turned back under the guise of a relocation. Even a brief consideration suggests that launching a major operation in the Hunan and Jiangxi regions would have been reckless, even from a sanitary perspective.
 
 It is nothing short of tragic when supply lines are cut off, as in this operation, or rather, when they are reduced to a state where there are no supply lines at all. The plan to establish a supply line to the south ended up cutting off the supply line instead. This is the metaphor of the hunter becoming the hunted. Just to be clear, I will explain what I know about Operation Xikan, which followed a similar course . Operation Xikan in 1942 , as the name suggests, was carried out mainly in Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces. A river flows parallel to the Yangtze River from west to east through these two provinces. It is called the Fuchun River (its downstream is the Qiantong River  don't remember exactly when, but around that time the Army proposed the term "war malnutrition." According to the explanation given by the Expeditionary Forces' Medical Department, the cause was that soldiers had fought to the physical and mental limits under adverse conditions, which resulted in exhaustion and malnutrition among the soldiers.
 
 
 The proposal for a new disease name was unacceptable to the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. A detailed investigation was conducted by a team led by Professor Kosaku Kakinuma of the University of Tokyo. The results revealed no evidence of malnutrition, as the Army had claimed, and concluded that most cases were due to chronic amoebic dysentery or malaria. This was a humiliating incident for the Expeditionary Force's medical department, but it was not made public. The story was revealed by the hospital's director, Lieutenant Colonel Takagi Chitose, during a luncheon at Jinan Army Hospital (the Army had a tradition of unit officers gathering together for lunch). Given that few fellow military doctors knew about this, it seems likely that the leadership would have preferred not to reveal it. However, the director accidentally blurted it out after admonishing a hospital surgeon for diagnosing a patient with "war malnutrition." However, the term "malnutrition" seems to have continued to be used in postwar society.
 
 
[/quote]
 
 
[quote]https://apjjf.org/tsuneishi-keiichi/2194/article
Beginning in 1942, Japan began dropping pathogens from airplanes into battlefield zones, on a scale that amounted to a combat operation. In April, Japan launched the Zhejiang campaign. In this campaign, Ishii and company carried out massive biological weapons attacks. Cholera bacteria was the main pathogen employed, and the attacks resulted in more than 10,000 casualties. It has also been reported that some victims contracted dysentery and the plague. More than 1700 soldiers died, mostly from cholera. This would have been considered a great success for the Ishii group, but for the fact that all of the victims were Japanese soldiers.
 
A Japanese medic captured by American forces at the end of 1944 described the casualties among the Japanese army during his interrogation: “When Japanese troops overran an area in which a [biological weapons] attack had been made during the Chekiang [Zhejiang] campaign in 1942, casualties upward from 10,000 resulted within a very brief period of time. Diseases were particularly cholera, but also dysentery and pest [bubonic plague]. Victims were usually rushed to hospitals in rear. … Statistics which POW saw at Water Supply and Purification Dept Hq at Nanking showed more than 1,700 dead, chiefly from cholera; POW believes that actual deaths were considerably higher, ‘it being a common practice to pare down unpleasant figures.’” [3][/quote]
 
Japan wanted to permanently hold onto west Zhejiang and north Jiangxi in the Zhejiang-Jiangxi campaign, because they feared airbases could be rebuilt even though they destroyed them. They failed to hold the territory, after getting their own troops infected with cholera which they used in Zhejiang to try to defeat Chinese troops, and due to locals with muskets firing on them in the mountains. They did not intend to withdrawal in the Zhejiang-Jiangxi campaign.
 
What pro-Japan apologists falsely label as "temporary raids" in China were meant to hold territory if they could secure it. Japan meant to permanently occupied Zhejiang and north Jiangxi, as well as Changde, as well as Changsha in the first three battles, as well as West Hubei, as well as Ningxia, Gansu, Qinghai and Kunlun pass. Japan was defeated in the battles to take those places.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2598925#p2598925
 
He also says Japanese suffered heavily from the hot climate and disease in eastern Hunan and eastern Guangxi and that the areas of "Japanese control" on the map were in fact disconnected dotted outposts of Japanese garrisons, Japan never effectively controlled the countryside of most of China.
 
[quote]前年5月27日の湘桂作戦開始以来、漢口と衡陽の間約350キロをおおむね二往復した他、宜昌方面250キロを往復して約2000キロ弱を行動したことになる。この間に目にしたもの、日本内地では日本軍が進めば進撃したと言い、勝った勝ったと囃し立てた。しかし現地にいる我々は既述の通り、兵站線の状況を見れば到底勝ったなどと言えないことは分かっていた。ことに住民の視線は冷たかった。彼等は古来戦乱に馴れているせいか立ち回りが上手で、商売のためなら日本軍にでも近づいて来るが、それは友好とか親善とかとはまったく無縁であった。日本兵の勝者意識を嵩に着た態度が向こうの人たちの反感を買ったのも理由の一つであるが、まあ不徳の致すところと言うべきか。とにかく彼等は民を大切にしない権力には自国であれ他国であれ決して頭を下げない民族性を持っているのだ。したがって日本軍に協力することなどまったく無かった。これが日本軍が中国で点と線しか占領できなかった最大の理由であろう。
 
 粤漢線ルートを二往復する間に、対米戦闘で南の島が次々と玉砕するのと軌を一にするようにシ江進攻軍も敗退し、もはや中国戦線も劣勢は必然となっていた。内地では報道管制の下に敗戦をひた隠しにしていたようだが、軍隊社会では秘密に出来ない。作戦当初は勇み立っていた将兵も、必勝の信念などとは皆目縁が無くなって、話題も米軍の上陸作戦の火力の凄さとか、日本軍の対戦車砲は目標に命中しても跳ね返って役に立たない等、万事休した話ばかりであった。[/quote]
 
[quote]Since the start of the Xianggui Operation on May 27 of the previous year, the Japanese had traveled nearly 2,000 kilometers, making two trips between Hankou and Hengyang, covering approximately 350 kilometers, and a 250-kilometer round trip toward Yichang. During this time, the Japanese in the mainland declared that the Japanese had advanced and cheered, "We've won!" However, as mentioned above, those of us on the ground knew, given the state of our supply lines, that victory was anything but. The locals were particularly cold toward us. Perhaps accustomed to warfare for centuries, they were adept at maneuvering, and would approach the Japanese army for business, but it had nothing to do with friendship or goodwill. One reason for this was the Japanese soldiers' victorious attitude, which aroused resentment among the local people, but perhaps it was also down to their own lack of virtue. In any case, the Japanese people were a people who would never bow down to any authority, whether their own or another, that did not respect its people. Therefore, they had absolutely no intention of cooperating with the Japanese army. This is probably the main reason why the Japanese army was only able to occupy dots and lines in China.
 
During the two trips along the Guanghan Line, the Sijiang Invasion Army was defeated, in tandem with the American battles on southern islands, and it was now inevitable that the Chinese front would also be at a disadvantage. It seems that the defeat was kept hidden in the mainland under press censorship, but it could not be kept a secret in military society. The soldiers and officers who had been full of courage at the beginning of the operation now no longer had any belief in certain victory, and the only talk they had was of the incredible firepower of the US landing operation, or the fact that Japanese anti-tank guns were useless because they bounced off their targets, leaving them with no hope of success.[/quote]
 
 
He noted that the Japanese were crushed in the battle of West Hunan (Zhijiang campaign).
 
[quote] 6月10日出発。車上から見たものは三々五々喘ぐように撤退する敗残兵の列だった。昔は敗残兵というのは中国軍と相場が決まっていたが、今や目にした敗残兵は間違いなく日本軍だった。軍服は破れて、繕ってはあるが継ぎ当ての布が中国生地の紺の木綿だから余計に哀れが目立つ。中には支給の軍服はなくなって適当な中国服を着ている者もいる。それでも銃と剣だけは後生大事に担いで、足を引きずりながら歩くその姿は痛々しいの言葉だけでは言い表すことは出来ない。どこの部隊かと思ったら、これが嵐部隊(第百十六師団)らしい。我々追及隊が長沙のあたりを行軍中に立派な装備で隊伍も堂々と、我々を追い抜いて行った大部隊があったが、これが確か嵐部隊だった。が、2か月経ったこの姿。一体どうしたのか。記録によればシ江方面は援蒋ルートを通じての米国の援助が行き届いた地区だったので、敵の装備も自動小銃、バズーカ砲と米国式になっていた。地の利に加えて圧倒的な火力の優勢は日本軍の及ぶところではなかったようだ。その結果がこの体たらく。6月12日、衡陽帰着。
[/quote]
 
[quote] We set off on June 10th. From the carriage, we saw a line of retreating soldiers, gasping for breath. In the past, the term "remnants" was generally used to refer to Chinese troops, but now the remnants we saw were undoubtedly Japanese. Their uniforms were torn and mended, but the patches were made of navy blue Chinese cotton, making their pitiful state all the more apparent. Some had lost their issued uniforms and were wearing makeshift Chinese clothing. Still, they clung to their guns and swords, and their limping appearance was beyond words. I wondered which unit they belonged to, and it turned out to be the Storm Unit (116th Division). While our pursuit unit was marching around Changsha, a large unit, well-equipped and imposing, passed us. I'm sure it was the Storm Unit. But two months later, they were still like this. What had happened? According to records, the area around Sijiang was a region that had received extensive American aid through the Chiang Kai-shek route, and the enemy's equipment was American-style, including automatic rifles and bazookas. With the advantage of terrain and overwhelming firepower, it seemed that the Japanese forces were no match for them. The result was this mess. They returned to Hengyang on June 12th.[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote]第10章:攸県野戦病院
 
 醴陵を出発以来、約10日をかけて攸県に到着した。途中、黄土嶺(現地の立て札には皇図嶺とあった)では周辺の敵情悪く4~5日留まった。歩兵部隊は寡兵よく応戦して進路を開いた。攸県到着9月22日。攸県はメイ水の右岸(北側)にある。到着後2~3日は各部の宿営割り当てや病院開設に当たっての病室確保で忙しい思いをする。
 
 私の健康はいかにと言うに、醴陵攸県間約80キロあったが、行軍の方は落伍しないで歩き通した。もっとも一日何回かの下痢は続いていた。一日行軍して大汗をかいた後の宿営地では下痢がピタリと止まり、腹の痛みも不快感もなくなって全快と錯覚させるほど気分が良くなるのである。たぶん脱水症状が下痢用の水分まで汗にしてしまったのだろう。夕食、水分補給そして就寝するが、明け方になるとゴロゴロ腹鳴と共に下痢の前駆症状が始まる。そして下痢。この状態は復員するまで続いた。検査はしていないが慢性アメーバ症である。まあ、この程度のことで行軍を無事に乗り切ったと思ったら、攸県到着の3日目、またもやマラリア発作に襲われて4~5日休む。軍医が病気では体裁悪いが、ここまで来るとまったく元気という人は20名の軍医のうち数名に過ぎない。
 
 調子が悪いといってそうそう寝てはいられない。少し良くなると病室に回診に行く。ここ攸県では醴陵病院の時とは患者の様子が一変していた。もちろんアメーバ赤痢、マラリアは私同様、まったくの初感染という人は少ない。だが4ヶ月あまりの戦闘の疲労も重なって皆痩せ衰えている。たまに痩せていない者がいても、よく見ると浮腫である。脚気症状も顕著である。戦場の衛生管理が悪くなったので皆虱がたかっていた。
 
 昭和17年の淅カン作戦の折、「戦争栄養失調症」なる病名を発案した派遣軍軍医部の事情もよく分かるのである。医学論議は別として、衰弱患者が増えたことは事実だった。
 ある日一つの病棟の診察を終えて帰途につくと、診療助手を務めてくれた衛生下士官が言う。「軍医殿、あの何某という患者は明朝死んでいますね。」「何故」と私は訊いた。
「今見ていたら、あの患者から虱がどんどん這い出して両側の患者の方に移動していました。先日も同じような事を見ましたが、虱に見放されたら人間もお終いですね。」
なるほど鋭い観察力。ずばり患者の体温下降を暗示していた。今日現代の医療なら別に問題とするほどの症状ではないかも知れぬが、点滴はおろか生理食塩水注射も何も出来ない状況では。止むを得ないとは申せ、御遺族の心中を察すれば言葉も無い。現在の医療施設で同様の事が起これば間違いなく医療事故として厳しく糾弾されるであろう。そもそも基礎疾患であるマラリア、アメーバ症の段階でしっかり治療できる薬品の準備や体制があれば、これほど悲惨な結果をもたらさなくとも済んだのではないか。元を糾せば補給を怠った作戦に原因があるのではないか。
 
 陸軍にはもともと歩兵が一番偉いという思想があって、歩兵科でないと陸軍大将になれないという伝説まであったようだ(もちろん実際にはそうではなかった)。真っ先駈けて命を捨てる立場から、歩兵でなければ兵に非ずとまで思い込んでいた人もいたらしい。この思想の裏返しが、輜重兵すなわち補給部隊の軽視につながったのだろう。
 
   輜重輸卒が兵隊ならば 蝶々とんぼも鳥のうち
 
という戯れ歌が昔からあって、今次戦争中までもこの歌を口にする者があった。物資を大量に消費する近代戦をまったく理解していなかったものと言わねばならぬ。
 
 もろもろの要因が重なって不運にも栄養失調状態になった兵は、藁や戸板を敷いた名ばかりのベッドに寝かされた。蝿や蚊や虱に悩まされながら、顔の浮腫が引いた時には息も絶えていた。隣りに寝ている患者にも気付かれぬほどひっそりと死んでいった。
 
 病室、病人の話はこれ以上書くに忍びない。とても書けない。そんなこんなで攸県に滞留すること一ヶ月余り。気候もそろそろ涼しくなり始めた11月初め、初年兵受領のため漢口に出張せよとの命令を貰った。兵隊を受領するという言葉は、まるで兵隊を品物と取り違えているようで不思議な感じがした。[/quote]
 
[quote]Chapter 10: You County Field Hospital
 
After leaving Liling, it took about 10 days to reach You County. En route, we remained at Huangtuling (a local sign called it Huangtuling) for four to five days due to the hostile situation in the surrounding area. Our infantry unit fought back well with few troops and opened a path. We arrived in You County on September 22nd. You County is located on the right (north) bank of the Mei River. After arriving, we were busy for two to three days assigning camps to each unit and securing hospital rooms for the hospital's opening.
 
As for my health, the distance between Liling and You County was about 80 kilometers, but we made the entire march without falling behind. However, I continued to suffer from diarrhea several times a day. After a day of marching and sweating profusely, when we returned to camp, the diarrhea stopped completely, and the stomach pain and discomfort disappeared, leaving me feeling so well that I almost felt completely recovered. Perhaps dehydration had caused me to sweat out even the fluids meant for diarrhea. I had dinner, hydrated, and went to bed, but at dawn, the onset of pre-diarrheic symptoms, accompanied by rumbling stomach rumbling, began. Then the diarrhea began. This condition continued until I was discharged. I wasn't tested, but it turned out to be chronic amebiasis. Just when I thought I'd made it through the march safely, on the third day after arriving in Youxian, I was hit again with a malaria attack and had to rest for four or five days. It's embarrassing for a military doctor to be sick, but at this point, only a few of the 20 military doctors were completely healthy.
 
Just because I wasn't feeling well, I couldn't stay up long enough to sleep. Once I felt a little better, I made my rounds in the hospital rooms. Here in Youxian, the patients' condition had changed completely from when I was at Liling Hospital. Of course, like me, few were experiencing amebic dysentery or malaria for the first time. But, compounded by the fatigue of over four months of combat, everyone was emaciated. Even the occasional person who wasn't thin was swollen, and a closer look revealed swelling. The symptoms of beriberi were also evident. Hygiene on the battlefield had deteriorated, and lice were everywhere.
 
This explains the circumstances of the Expeditionary Army's Medical Department, which coined the term "war malnutrition" during Operation Shikan in 1942. Medical debate aside, the fact is that the number of emaciated patients was on the rise.
 
One day, as I was heading home after seeing a ward, the medical assistant, a medical non-commissioned officer, said, "Doctor, that patient named so-and-so will be dead tomorrow morning." "Why?" I asked.
 
"I just looked, and I saw lice crawling out of that patient and moving to the patients on either side. I saw something similar the other day, and I'm sure humans are doomed if they are abandoned by lice."
 
His keen observation skills were evident. It was a clear indication that the patient's body temperature was dropping. With modern medicine, this might not be a serious problem, but in a situation where IV drips, let alone saline injections, were not possible, While it was unavoidable, I am speechless when I imagine the feelings of the bereaved families. If a similar incident were to occur in a current medical facility, it would undoubtedly be severely condemned as a medical malpractice. If there had been a system and preparations for proper treatment of the underlying diseases of malaria and amebiasis, perhaps such a tragic outcome could have been avoided. Perhaps the root cause lies in the neglect of supplies.
 
The Army has always held the belief that infantry is the most important, and there was even a legend that only infantrymen could become generals (although, of course, this was not actually the case). As the first to run and risk their lives, some people even believed that if they were not infantrymen, they were not really soldiers. The flip side of this belief likely led to a disregard for quartermasters, i.e., the supply corps.
 
If quartermasters are soldiers, then butterflies and dragonflies are birds.
 
There is an old, humorous song that continues to be sung even during the war. It must be said that they had no understanding of modern warfare, which consumes large quantities of supplies.
 
Many soldiers were unfortunate enough to become malnourished due to a combination of factors, and were forced to sleep on so-called beds made of straw or wooden boards. Plagued by flies, mosquitoes, and lice, by the time the swelling in their faces subsided, they had already died. They died so quietly that even the patient sleeping next to them did not notice.
 
I cannot bear to write any more about the hospital room and the patients. I simply cannot write. And so I remained in Youxian for just over a month. In early November, when the weather was starting to cool, I received orders to travel to Hankou to receive my new recruits. The phrase "receive soldiers" seemed strange, as if they were mistaking soldiers for goods.[/quote]
 
The resistance of merely 16,000 outnumbered Chinese troops at Hengyang for 41 days contributed to the mass casualties among Japanese, both of Japanese killed in battle and those from disease.
 
Because Japan's attack against eastern Hunan began in May 1944, Japan expected the whole campaign to finish off by the end of May, they expected Hengyang to be captured in three days after Changsha fell. That was in spring.
 
Instead, the defenders of Hengyang dragged the campaign all the way to 8 August, deep in the hot days of summer. Japanese were forced to fight in the treacherous heat and mosquito infested muddy wet rice paddies around Hengyang for 41 days.
 
Japan expected to capture east Guangxi by August, by then they wouldn't have to worry about food since they would have survived on their own rations.
 
Instead, Japanese soldiers around Hengyang were forced to eat immature green rice shoots for 41 days, suffering from mass diarrhea from the immature rice in addition to bacterial diarrhea and dysentery, in the hot sun of southern China, in the muddy rice paddies full of mosquitos. They had to constantly transport food, ammunition and medical supplies all the way from Hankou all the way to Changsha and then to Hengyang over rivers and mountainous roads for weeks.
 
Japanese soldiers suffered en masse because of Chinese resistance. Japan was expecting to break through eastern Hunan in a few days. Instead they suffered for weeks. If Chinese troops at Hengyang gave up on the first day, Japan would have sped through eastern Hunan without suffering much losses since they wouldn't have to fight for weeks in the summer heat in muddy rice paddies with only immature rice to eat.
 
Disease deaths of Japanese soldiers in China were directly related and due to Chinese resistance, unlike in the Pacific where most of the Japanese were going to die of malaria anyway regardless of the fighting.
 
Instead, Japan needed replacements for 100,000 soldiers (casualties from all causes) in the eastern Hunan battles alone in 1944 (in Changsha, Hengyang and other battles in east Hunan). This is while Chiang Kai-shek actively cut off ammunition and reinforcements to Xue Yue's 9th war zone in Hunan, Jiangxi and Guangdong. Chiang sent fighter planes, trucks, fuel, ammunition and 120,000 troops (both his own central government soldiers and Ma Bufang's warlord soldiers) to Xinjiang in 1942 and kept them in Xinjiang for the entire war, fighting the Ili rebellion from 1944-1946. 
 
Japanese defence ministry lied, and referred to all their opponents in China as "Chongqing army" (basically claiming they were all central government forces). Chiang actively denied ammunition and supplies to Xue Yue during the battles in east Hunan and refused to send his troops from Shaanxi and Sichuan against the Japanese to relieve pressure on Xue Yue (a general suggested a counteroffensive in northern China against Japan in summer 1944 and Chiang rejected it).
 
!00,000 Japanese soldiers were already killed in the previous three battles of Changsha and Changde in Hunan.
 
The Japanese defence ministry's casualty figures are nonsense, as admitted by the Japanese POW who was interrogated in 1944.
 
The words of Japanese soldiers expose the lies of their defence ministry. Fujioka Akiyoshi's autobiography/diary exposed Senshi Sōsho lying about the casualties Japan suffered in Jolo and the time and main enemy (the Moros massacred tons of Japanese months before the Americans landed as admitted by Fujioka Akiyoshi, while Senshi Sōsho claims the battle started when Americans landed and says nothing about Moros).
 
This Japanese autobiography combined with the Japanese POW in 1944 expose Senshi Sōsho's lies about the Zhejiang campaign being a success, Senshi Sōsho says nothing about the mass deaths of Japanese from their own bioweapons.
 
https://web.archive.org/web/20250805064929/https://yryk.seesaa.net/article/209366442.html
 
[quote]
「・・・モロは怨恨や兵器欲、貴金属欲、排他性の外に、単に、殺人自身に興味を持っているのである。数百名の米比敗残兵は、曽てモロ族に首を切られてしまったと聞いていたが、今また数千名の敗残日本軍が、彼らのヤイバに斃れたのだ。
 我々がこの島に上陸して一カ月と経たないうちに、百名に近い兵隊がモロに殺されてしまった。いずれも『コムパニー、コムパニー』(友達の意)と近寄り、油断を見て蕃刀の抜討に会ったのである。一番多くやられたのは歩哨であった。
 最初の間は、彼らは少人数を狙って来たが、日本軍与し易しと見るや大胆となり、毎日定時に一定の道を通る部隊を待ち伏せるようになった。ある部隊の命令受領者九名は、毎日定時に命令受領に通る道を待ち伏せされて全員戦死。私の部隊の一コ小隊は山の分哨に出ていたが、毎朝麓の部落まで野菜の買出しに行くのを待ち伏せされて、一行十二名全員戦死。ある部落では日本兵を歓迎して毎日御馳走を出し、空腹の日本兵が大勢で招待されているところに、手榴弾を投げ、首を切って廻った。またある部隊の一コ小隊は山の陣地に糧秣運搬中、協力していたモロに突如背かれて皆殺しにあった。
 彼らのジャングル戦の巧妙さに至っては、実に驚嘆の外はない。
 突如、前方から射って来る。すわ応戦と銃を向ける頃には、すでに後に廻って射って来る。それ後方だと振り向くと槍、蕃刀の突撃である。彼らの射撃は専ら肉薄狙撃で、たいていの場合日本軍は、あまりの突然の近接射撃に、泡を喰って混乱に陥り、夥しい犠牲を出した。私は行軍中突如、彼らの小銃の発射煙をかぶったことすらある。それほど接近しても、彼らの足音を聞き取り、または彼らの姿を先に発見した例は未だ聞いたことがない。風の如く来り、風の如く去る通り魔とでも言おうか。彼らは襲撃の際、異様な兇声を発す。それは人間のものとは思えないような疳高い不吉な声で、敗残生活に入ってからは、その声を聞くと、猫ににらまれた鼠の如く立ちすくんでしまうのが常であった。
 最初日本軍は、来るべき日に備えて、モロの暴行にはなるべく犠牲を惜しみ、モロを刺戟しない方針をとっていたが、遂に参謀をして『敵は米軍に非ず、モロなり』と叫ばしめた。
 頻々たる分哨襲撃事件に業を煮やした兵団は、一日、歩兵一コ大隊に山砲を配して大討伐を行ったが、ジャングル戦に馴れていない日本軍は、弓と槍と蕃刀と小銃による神出鬼没の肉薄攻撃に、小児の如く翻弄され、著しい犠牲を出して逃げ帰った。帰り路には、すでに先廻りしたモロが、多数の樹を路に並べて山砲の進行を阻害、これを踏み越えるのにまごついているところを突撃されて、あわや山砲を奪取されるところであった。
 それ以来、遠方の分哨を引き揚げ、ホロ町付近の警備だけにやっとの形となった。そのホロ町の飛行場すら、白昼襲撃を受けることもあった。
 かくて、参謀をして再び、『モロは相手にせず、真の敵は米軍なり、その日のために兵力を保全すべし』と叫ばしめた。」[/quote]
 
[quote]"...Moros are not interested in resentment, desire for weapons, precious metals, or exclusivity; they are simply interested in murder itself. I had heard that hundreds of American and Filipino stragglers had previously been beheaded by the Moros, but now thousands of defeated Japanese troops had fallen to their swords.
 
Less than a month after we landed on this island, nearly 100 soldiers had been killed by the Moros. They approached each other saying 'kompany, kompany' (meaning friends), and when they let their guard down, they were assassinated with their swords. The most common victims were sentries.
 
At first, they targeted small numbers, but once they saw that the Japanese were easy to defeat, they became bolder and began to ambush troops that passed by a certain route at a fixed time every day. Nine commanders from one unit passed by at the fixed time every day to receive their orders. They were ambushed on the road and all killed in action. A platoon from my unit was on patrol in the mountains, but every morning they were ambushed as they went to a village at the foot of the mountain to buy vegetables, and all 12 members of the group were killed in action. In one village, Japanese soldiers were welcomed and a feast was served every day, and when many hungry Japanese soldiers were invited in, they threw grenades and beheaded them. Another platoon from another unit was transporting provisions to a mountain position when the Moro who had been helping them suddenly turned against them and killed them all.
Their ingenuity in jungle warfare is truly amazing.
Suddenly they would fire from the front. By the time you raised your gun to return fire, they would already be firing from behind. If you were from the rear, you would turn around to find them charging with spears and swords. Their fire was exclusively close-quarters sniping, and in most cases the Japanese army would be shocked by the sudden close proximity. The fire caused confusion and resulted in heavy casualties. I even found myself suddenly covered in smoke from their rifle fire while marching. Even when I got that close, I have never heard of anyone hearing their footsteps or spotting them first. They were like random thugs who come like the wind and go like the wind. When they attacked, they would let out a strange, ferocious cry. It was a high-pitched, ominous voice that seemed inhuman, and after living in defeat, whenever I heard it, I would freeze up like a mouse caught in a cat's gaze.
Initially, the Japanese army, in preparation for the day to come, adopted a policy of sparing as many casualties as possible in the Moro assaults and not provoking them, but eventually they had a staff officer shout out, "The enemy is not the US military, it is the Moro!"
Frequent attacks on pickets Frustrated by the incident, the Japanese corps, one day equipped with a mountain gun and an infantry battalion, launched a major suppression operation. However, the Japanese troops, unaccustomed to jungle warfare, were at the mercy of the sudden, close-quarters attacks using bows, spears, swords, and rifles, and were forced to flee with heavy casualties. On the way back, the Moro, who had already advanced ahead of them, lined the road with numerous trees to block the mountain gun's progress. While they were struggling to get over them, they were attacked and nearly had their mountain gun seized.
After that, they withdrew their outlying sentries and were reduced to guarding the area around Jolo. Even the Jolo airfield was sometimes attacked in broad daylight.
As a result, the staff officer was once again forced to shout, 'Don't bother with the Moro. The real enemy is the U.S. military. We must conserve our forces for that day.'"[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1763417483 user_id=116835]
[quote=limited post_id=2603973 time=1763329119 user_id=116835]
This interview of an injured Japanese soldier who was at Hengyang was edited by the Japanese government, unlike the Japanese diaries in the above posts which were not edited by government and military censors. He was injured in a battle after Hengyang.
 
It tries to downplay the Japanese humiliation but is forced to admit the heavy slaughter and suffering of the Japanese at Hengyang, admitting Japan expected to take Hengyang in only three days during the spring and that the Japanese only carried two days supplies of food, resulting in mass disease and diarrhea among Japanese as the siege stretched for weeks into the summer heat and they were forced to drink infected pond water infected with bacteria from corpses in the ponds.
 
https://www.heiwakinen.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/archive/library/roukunote/onketsu/04/O_04_324_1.pdf
 
https://www.heiwakinen.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/archive/library/roukunote/onketsu/04/O_04_319_1.pdf
 
All the disease deaths in Hengyang were caused by Chinese resistance, unlike in the Pacific where disease and hot weather was endemic all year round.  The defenders at Hengyang stretched out the siege for weeks, if they surrendered immediately then Japan wouldn't have lost 100,000 men in the east Hunan battles.
 
Because this is on a Japanese government website, the interview pathetically tries to save face by trying to mention "enemy corpses" lying around when it admits Japanese were shredded and blasted to pieces, as if that makes up for the greater number of Japanese deaths, and even tries to pathetically claimed the surviving outnumbered Chinese garrison on 8 August surrendered in "huge numbers", trying to compare it to surrender at Bataan (only 3,000 combat capable Chinese soldiers were left after they slaughtered Japanese multiple times their number) and the 3,000 escaped later. 
 
There were 16,275 Chinese against over 110,000 Japanese (which the interview doesn't mention) and tens of thousands of Japanese died, greater than the number of Chinese soldiers. The Chinese were armed with inferior weaponry.
 
This is the title of a collection of testimonies by the small number of Japanese soldiers who survived in Mindanao, including from the battle of Tamparan where Maranao Moro Muslims slaughtered most of a Japanese unit on 11-12 September 1942 with bolo machetes and keris daggers.
 
[quote]Kyo-10621 Butai, Seikansha no Shuki: Sensensoki (Memoirs of survivors: memories of the battle line), private printing, 1973. 
 
據一○六二一部隊『生還者の手記戦線想起』一九七三年がある。
 
10621 部隊編『生還者の手記:戦線想起』 1977 年、 39 頁。[/quote]
 
https://shogundo.ocnk.net/phone/product/11936
 
http://jiristransky.com/item/20266006.htm
 
https://www.mamenoki-shokugyo.net/product/20266006
 
https://chambersbr.com/goodspage/20266006.htm
 
Japanese interviews from the Luzon campaign.
 
https://sakyu-history.com/barete/alive/
 
https://shogundo.ocnk.net/phone/product-list/11/0/?num=60&page=2
 
https://shogundo.ocnk.net/product-list/11/0/?num=30&sort=featured&page=8
 
Another Japanese private diary admitted Japan was defeated in the second battle of Changsha (pro-Japan apologist hacks falsely claim the first three battles of Changsha were just "raids" for "supplies" or "distractions" to lure the Chinese army from elsewhere)
 
https://ktymtskz.my.coocan.jp/J/imai/imai.htm
 
[quote] 昭和十六年末に始まった南支の第二次長沙作戦で、第六師団長であった神田は、第十一軍司令官阿南の無謀な作戦でさんざんな苦戦を強いられ、それについて批判的な手記を残しているのだが。
 
During the Second Changsha Campaign in Southern China, which began at the end of 1941, Kanda, commander of the 6th Division, suffered a terrible defeat due to the reckless tactics of General Anami, commander of the 11th Army, and left behind a critical memoir about the battle.[/quote]
 
Its easy to tell which diaries and interviews were edited by the Japanese government.
 
Those ultranationalists who try to save face are pathetic.
 
Japanese soldier Ogishima Shizuo's diary exposed embarrassing details about Japanese in the battle of Shanghai, with Chinese units armed with inferior weapons slaughtering Japanese in brutal attacks.
 
Then certain Japanese claimed Ogishima Shizuo didn't exist and the dairy is a forgery, because Ogishima Shizuo's diary was uncovered in China and published in China.
 
Then when its pointed out that Japanese soldiers like Fujioka Akiyoshi and others published their own diaries in Japan in Japanese publishing houses, revealing Japanese soldiers were slaughtered and butchered and Japanese morale totally broke down, suddenly all of the same people are silent.
 
Multiple private Japanese diaries published in Japan reveal Japanese military command and the defence ministry lied about casualties, lied about "victories", lied about almost everything.
 
Japanese female settlers who got raped after the Soviet August Storm operation against Japanese in Manchukuo in August 1945, reveal that in addition to Chinese civilian men raping Japanese women, the Japanese Kwantung army soldiers themselves also tried to rape Japanese girls after throwing down their weapons and trying to hide from Soviet troops. (the article mistakenly refers to a place in northeast China as "Xi'an". The actual Xi'an was in Shaanxi and was never occupied by Japan.
 
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASR3B7QT1R37UPQJ00X.html?iref=koesenso_special_asahicom
 
[quote]引き揚げ待つ日々、銃剣を突きつけられた 戦時の性暴力を考える
有料記事
 
大野さえ子2023年3月12日 12時00分
list
0
写真・図版
同志社大学教授の秋林こずえさん
写真・図版
 
[PR]
 ロシアのウクライナ侵攻から1年。現地ではロシア兵による性暴力の被害が相次ぎ報告されています。個人の尊厳を深く傷つける行為は、いつ、どこでも起こりえます。朝日新聞「声」欄には、太平洋戦争後の混乱期の被害を打ち明ける投稿が届きました。「戦時には女性が『コミュニティーの所有物』という意識が強化されることがある」と、ジェンダー研究者の秋林こずえ・同志社大学教授は語ります。性暴力被害をなくすために何ができるのか。2人の読者の肉声とともに考えます。
 
ポッドキャストで聞けます
番組では、投稿を寄せてくださった2人の女性のインタビュー音声とともに、秋林こずえ教授をスタジオに迎えて、戦時の性暴力の根底にあるものを考えます。
 
 1945年8月15日の敗戦後、外地から引き揚げてきたのは約629万人。中国からは約154万人、旧満州(中国東北部)からは約127万人が日本の地を踏みました。引き揚げるまでの避難生活で起きた出来事、「一生、言わないつもりだった」という被害をつづった手紙が「声」編集部に届きました。
 
 東京都の清水久枝さん(88)の投稿「伝える 生きながらえた証し」(2022年7月18日掲載)をご紹介します。
 
        ◇
 
 1945(昭和20)年8月15日、国民学校5年生の私は、中国・西安の叔母の家で敗戦を知った。9月初旬には「日本人を皆殺しにせよ」と暴動が起きた。ゴボウ畑の中に隠れて難を逃れたが、母は捕らえられ、腰巻き姿で解放された。
 
 1カ月後、母の使いで外に出たら突然、八路軍兵士に銃剣を突きつけられ、廃屋まで歩かされた。兵士は私の周囲をゆっくりと歩き、銃剣でスカートをめくった。直立不動、泣き叫ぶことも抵抗もできない。兵士は127センチの小娘の私に「歩け」とあごで合図。私はゆっくりと歩いて外へ出て、脱兎(だっと)のごとく走った。
 
 12月初旬には、日本軍の元兵士が「お手伝いしてほしい」とやってきた。彼の後に従って行くと、体育館についた。戸を開けると、元兵士にいきなり押し倒され、両手を押さえつけられた。「何するんだ! 離せ!」と両足をばたつかせ暴れた。すると、パッと自由になり、裸足で一目散に逃げた。元兵士は股間を押さえて走っていった。
 
 数々の危険な体験は生涯、秘密にするつもりだった。しかし、軍国時代を生きながらえた証しを残したく、ペンをとった。
 
        ◇
 
 清水さんに、当時の様子や思いをさらに伺いました。
 
Waiting to Be Repatriated, a Bayonet Held to My Chest:
Thinking About Sexual Violence in Wartime
Paid article
 
Saeko Ōno — 12 March, 2023, 12:00 p.m.
 
Photograph:
Professor Kozue Akibayashi of Doshisha University
 
One year has passed since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Reports from the region continue to emerge of sexual violence committed by Russian soldiers. Acts that deeply violate an individual’s dignity can occur anywhere, at any time. Letters have arrived at the Asahi Shimbun’s “Voices” column from people who are speaking out about what they suffered during the chaotic period after the Pacific War. “In wartime, the idea that women are ‘the property of the community’ can become stronger,” says gender studies scholar Professor Kozue Akibayashi of Doshisha University. What can be done to eliminate sexual violence? We consider this question along with the voices of two readers.
 
Available as a podcast
In the program, we play interview recordings with the two women who sent in their accounts, and welcome Professor Akibayashi into the studio to explore the underlying causes of wartime sexual violence.
 
After Japan’s defeat on 15 August, 1945, about 6.29 million people were repatriated from former overseas territories. Approximately 1.54 million returned from China, and about 1.27 million from former Manchuria (northeastern China) set foot back in Japan. A letter arrived at the “Voices” editorial department describing events that occurred during the period of evacuation before repatriation—experiences the writer had intended to “never speak of for the rest of my life.”
 
Here we introduce the submission “To Tell It—Proof That I Survived,” written by Ms. Hisae Shimizu (88) of Tokyo and published on July 18, 2022.
 
 
On 15 August, 1945, when Japan lost the war, I was a fifth-grade student at a national school, staying at my aunt’s home in Xi’an, China. In early September, riots broke out with cries of “Kill all the Japanese!” We escaped danger by hiding in a burdock field, but my mother was captured and later released wearing only a loincloth-like undergarment.
 
A month later, I went outside on an errand for my mother and was suddenly confronted by an Eighth Route Army soldier who pointed a bayonet at me and forced me to walk to an abandoned house. He slowly circled around me and lifted my skirt with the bayonet. I stood rigid, unable to cry or resist. The soldier jerked his chin, signaling the 127-centimeter-tall little girl that I was to “walk.” I walked slowly outside, then bolted like a startled rabbit.
 
In early December, a former Japanese soldier came and asked, “Can you help me with something?” I followed him and arrived at a gymnasium. When he opened the door, he suddenly pushed me down and pinned my hands. “What are you doing?! Let me go!” I thrashed my legs and struggled. Then suddenly I was free, and I dashed off barefoot. The ex-soldier ran off holding his crotch.
 
I had intended to keep these many dangerous experiences a secret for the rest of my life. But I picked up my pen because I wanted to leave behind proof that I survived the militarist era.
 
 
We asked Ms. Shimizu to tell us more about those times and her feelings back then.
[/quote]
 
Japanese soldiers in the Philippines killed Japanese nurses by injecting them with creosote.
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0050/
 
[quote]「お二人の娘 私たちが殺した」
鈴木ツキさん
 
宮城県
 
93歳
 
2017年4月17日 紙面掲載
 
2019年7月27日 配信
 
看護師養成学校の卒業記念写真。左が鈴木ツキさん、隣に「母さんのけんちん汁うどん」を渇望しながらフィリピンで亡くなった同級生が並んでいた=1943年10月31日、宮城県石巻市にて
「フィリピンにて戦死。葬儀に参列を」。終戦の翌年、看護師養成学校時代の同級生の訃報(ふほう)が日本赤十字社から届いた。1943(昭和18)年秋の繰り上げ卒業まで、ともに学んだ仲間。同級生の消息を求めていた私は葬儀に駆けつけた。
 
彼女と戦地で一緒だった同級生5人に会えた。話は壮絶だった。米軍におびえつつ、患者を連れジャングルを逃避行。蛇、トカゲ、木の実と何でも食べた。栄養失調や赤痢で行軍に遅れる者は、クレゾールを注射、命を奪った。
 
彼女もマラリアで衰弱。「歩ける。注射しないで」と懇願され5人で支えたが、ついに軍医が「俺が注射する」。「やらねばならぬのなら自分たちで」と覚悟を決めた。木陰に身を寄せ、「少し休もう」と学生時代のように6人並んで横になり、安心した彼女が眠ると、1人が馬乗り、4人が手足を押さえ、注射したという。
 
「私たちが殺しました」。5人は両親にわびた。泣き伏していたお父さんは顔を上げ「ありがとう。娘は皆さんのおかげで日本に帰れました」と頭を下げた。「歩けぬ娘はそのまま残されたら、命の限り友を、親を呼び続けたでしょう。それは耐えられません」
 
5人が大切に持ち帰った彼女の従軍手帳には、カツ丼、親子丼と食べ物名がずらり。最後は「母さんのけんちん汁うどん」だった。
 
 
“Your Two Daughters — We Are the Ones Who Killed Them”
By Tsuki Suzuki
 
Miyagi Prefecture
Age 93
 
Published in print: 17 April, 2017
Digital release: 27 July, 2019
 
A commemorative graduation photo from the nursing school. Tsuki Suzuki is on the left; next to her stands the classmate who died in the Philippines, longing for “Mother’s kenchin-jiru udon.” — 31 October, 1943, Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture.
 
“The Philippines. Killed in action. Please attend the funeral.”
The year after the war ended, I received a death notice from the Japanese Red Cross for a classmate from my nursing school days. She was one of the companions with whom I had studied until the accelerated graduation in the fall of 1943. I had been trying to find out what happened to her, so I hurried to attend the funeral.
 
There I met five classmates who had been with her on the battlefield. Their story was harrowing. Terrified of the advancing U.S. forces, they fled through the jungle with their patients. They ate anything—snakes, lizards, wild nuts. Those who fell behind during the marches due to malnutrition or dysentery were injected with creosote, ending their lives.
 
She too had weakened from malaria. “I can still walk. Please don’t give me the injection,” she begged. The five supported her as best they could, but eventually the military doctor said, “I’ll do it.” Realizing what this meant, they steeled themselves: “If it must be done, then we’ll do it ourselves.”
 
They huddled in the shade of the trees. “Let’s rest a little,” they said, lying down in a row like they had back in their student days. When she relaxed and fell asleep, one of them sat astride her while the other four held down her arms and legs, and they gave the injection.
 
“We are the ones who killed her.”
The five apologized to her parents. Her father, who had been sobbing on the floor, lifted his head and said, “Thank you. Thanks to all of you, my daughter was able to return to Japan.”
“If a daughter who could no longer walk had been left behind, she would have cried out for her friends and parents until her last breath. I could not bear that.”
 
In the military service notebook the five had carefully brought back, a list of foods filled the pages—pork cutlet rice bowl, chicken-and-egg rice bowl, many more. The final entry read: “Mother’s kenchin-jiru udon.”
 
[/quote]
 
A common theme is that Japanese who were subjected to or witnessed the most brutal violence against other Japanese, are the ones who say they became anti-war. 
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0362/
 
[quote]南方で従軍 野草も食べ尽くし
小林キクエさん
 
新潟県
 
95歳
 
2014年5月20日 紙面掲載
 
2019年7月27日 配信
 
ラバウル近郊のココポの兵站病院に配属されていた頃の小林キクエさん、24歳=1943年7月4日、ニューブリテン島のココポにて
終戦をフィリピンの山中で迎えました。日赤救護班の看護師として従軍していたのです。
 
1943(昭和18)年3月、「南方」としか知らされずに日本を離れ、南太平洋のラバウルに渡りました。「内地から女性が来た」と砂糖入りの紅茶で歓迎され、近郊ココポの兵站(へいたん)病院に配属されましたが、戦況悪化でフィリピンに移動。連日爆撃を受け、マニラの陸軍病院から軍用トラックでバギオの分院へ。そこも危なくなると、月夜の晩に徒歩で脱出し、山岳地帯に分け入りました。
 
日中は米軍の爆撃があるので移動は夜。途中で亡くなる人もいましたが、埋葬する穴を掘る体力も次第になくなりました。行軍について行けず、クレゾールの静脈注射で亡くなった人もいました。
 
食料の配給もなくなり、住民が残した畑を見つけては掘り返して芋を探しました。芋のツルも葉も野草も食べ尽くしました。足がむくみ、靴の先を切ってなんとか押し込みました。栄養失調で、杖代わりの木の枝がなくては一歩も歩けないほどでした。赤痢やマラリアにもかかりながら、無事に帰還し、おなかいっぱい食べることだけを夢見て、生き抜いたのです。
 
平和の大切さを伝えたい。戦争は恐ろしいもの。人殺しです。
 
Serving in the South, he ate all the wild plants
Kikue Kobayashi
 
Niigata Prefecture
 
95 years old
 
Published on 20 May, 2014
 
Released on 27 July, 2019
 
Kikue Kobayashi, 24, was stationed at the Kokopo Logistics Hospital near Rabaul on July 4, 1943, in Kokopo, New Britain.
She met the end of the war in the mountains of the Philippines, where she had been serving as a nurse with the Japanese Red Cross relief team.
 
In March 1943, she left Japan, informed only of her destination being "Southern," and traveled to Rabaul in the South Pacific. Welcomed with tea and sugar, she was told, "A woman from the mainland," and assigned to the logistics hospital in nearby Kokopo, but as the war situation worsened, she was transferred to the Philippines. Bombed daily, she traveled by military truck from the army hospital in Manila to a branch hospital in Baguio. When it became too dangerous there, she escaped on foot on a moonlit night, venturing into the mountains.
 
Because of the American bombings during the day, the movement took place at night. Some died along the way, and the people gradually lost the strength to dig burial holes. Some were unable to keep up with the march and died from intravenous injections of creosote.
 
Food rations were no longer available, so they found fields left behind by local residents and dug them up in search of potatoes. They ate all the potato vines, leaves, and wild plants. Their feet swelled up, and they had to cut the toes off their shoes to fit them in. They were so malnourished that they could not even take a step without a tree branch to use as a walking stick. They contracted dysentery and malaria, but they survived, dreaming only of returning home safely and eating their fill.
 
I want to convey the importance of peace. War is a terrible thing. It kills people.
[/quote]
 
A Japanese nurse said she became anti-war because of the wounded Japanese soldiers she was tending to were suffering and crying in pain from being injured by Chinese troops.
 
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXKZO19989510V10C17A8CC1000/
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/1540/
 
The burning alive of Japanese in the air raids is what drove the Japanese people to psychological defeat as their "god" Hirohito could not protect them.
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0274/
 
[quote]夢に出る東京大空襲の記憶
保坂ときさん
 
東京都
 
84歳
 
2012年7月17日 紙面掲載
 
2019年7月27日 配信
 
女ばかり7人姉妹のわが家では、兵隊になることができません。親は肩身の狭い思いをしている。そう思い込み、看護婦として戦地に行こうと決心しました。
 
1944(昭和19)年に茨城県から上京し、都内の看護学校に入学しましたが、敗色が濃くなり、挺身隊(ていしんたい)として毎日寮から精工舎(現セイコー)の工場に通いました。そのころ工場を欠勤しない人にはローマンと呼ばれる野菜入りのパンが2個配布されました。いつもおなかをすかせていた私は、ほしくて1回も休みませんでした。
 
45(昭和20)年3月10日の東京大空襲は忘れもしません。性別も定かでない黒こげの死体がトラックで錦糸公園に運ばれ、2、3メートルの深さの穴に埋葬されていました。荒川には熱さに耐えかね飛び込んだ人の死体が無数に浮かび、男性が鳶口(とびぐち)でひっかけ、トラックに積んでいました。
 
その数日後私は喀血(かっけつ)し、看護学校を退学、故郷に戻りましたが、その恐ろしい風景を、今も夢に見ることがあります。
 
Memories of the Great Tokyo Air Raid appear in my dreams
Toki Hosaka
 
Tokyo
 
84 years old
 
Published on 17 July, 2012
 
Released on 27 July, 2019
 
With seven sisters in my family, it was impossible for me to become a soldier. I was convinced that my parents would feel ashamed. So I decided to go to the battlefield as a nurse.
 
I moved to Tokyo from Ibaraki Prefecture in 1944 and enrolled in a nursing school in the city, but as defeat became more and more likely, I joined the volunteer corps and commuted from my dormitory to the Seikosha (now Seiko) factory every day. At that time, anyone who didn't miss work at the factory was given two loaves of bread with vegetables called Roman. I was always hungry, so I craved one and never missed a day.
 
I will never forget the Great Tokyo Air Raid on March 10, 1945 (Showa 20). Charred bodies of unknown gender were transported by truck to Kinshi Park and buried in holes two or three meters deep. Countless bodies of people who had jumped into the Arakawa River, unable to bear the heat, were floating in the water; men were using scaffolding hooks to hook them onto trucks.
 
A few days later, I began coughing up blood, dropped out of nursing school, and returned to my hometown, but I still sometimes have dreams about that horrific scene.[/quote]
 
Japanese settlers died in droves after the Soviet Operation August storm.
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0236/
 
Japanese civilians were praying for victory and support of their relatives in the Japanese military before they were crushed in August storm.
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0184/
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0484/
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0485/
 
A Japanese soldier was sent home in 1942 from China with his leg amputated
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/1244/
 
Japanese atomic bomb victims at Hiroshima who were burned by radiation died in agony after hearing about Hirohito's radio broadcast announcing Japan's surrender. They were still hoping Japan won the war and lost all their will to live
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/1587/
 
Some Japanese nurses clearly lied to save their reputation, this Japanese nurse was under the custody of Soviet soldiers who gang raped every single Japanese female they saw, but she doesn't mention it out of shame.
 
https://www.asahi.com/special/koe-senso/id/0209/
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1763417242 user_id=116835]
http://video.nxnews.net/nxnewsvideo/nxds/nxkz.pdf
 
https://haikou.baogaosu.com/xinwen/%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E4%BE%B5%E7%90%BC%E7%BD%AA%E8%A1%8C%E8%A7%81%E4%BA%BA%E6%9D%80%E4%BA%BA%E9%80%A2%E5%B1%8B%E7%83%A7%E5%B1%8B/21852446/
 
http://www.360doc.com/content/23/0221/21/78660523_1068827256.shtml
 
https://www.facebook.com/100076409406590/posts/%E5%9B%9E%E8%BE%89%E4%BA%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%94%AF%E4%B8%80%E6%9D%A5%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%9C%E5%8D%97%E4%BA%9A%E7%9A%84%E7%A9%86%E6%96%AF%E6%9E%97%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E4%B8%BA%E4%BD%95%E6%89%8E%E6%A0%B9%E6%B5%B7%E5%8D%97%E8%BF%91%E5%8D%83%E5%B9%B4%E7%8E%AF%E7%90%83%E6%83%85%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%98%E5%9C%A8%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BF%A1%E4%BB%B0%E4%BC%8A%E6%96%AF%E5%85%B0%E6%95%99%E7%9A%84%E7%A9%86%E6%96%AF%E6%9E%97%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E9%9B%86%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%A8%E8%A5%BF%E5%8C%97%E5%9C%B0%E5%8C%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%8D%97%E6%96%B9%E7%9A%84%E7%A9%86%E6%96%AF%E6%9E%97%E7%BE%A4%E4%BD%93%E8%A7%84%E6%A8%A1%E8%BE%83%E5%B0%8F%E5%8D%B3%E4%BE%BF%E6%9C%89%E4%B9%9F%E5%A4%A7%E5%A4%9A%E9%83%BD%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%8E%E8%A5%BF%E5%8C%97%E5%9C%B0/679700007920307/
 
http://m.news.cntv.cn/2015/08/25/ARTI1440463684481346.shtml
 
 
[quote=limited post_id=2603462 time=1762933539 user_id=116835]
An ethnic minority woman from the Li ethnicity, from a village in Baoting county in Hainan (now Baoting Li and Miao Autonomous County) was raped by Japanese along with other Li women.
 
Japanese soldiers assaulted ethnic minority girls and stabbed their babies while telling these ethnic minorities they were "liberating" them from Han. They couldn't even control themselves for their propaganda to incite minorities.
 
I have included English language translations below the Japanese texts and Chinese texts.
 
虜囚の記憶 Page 219
野田正彰 
みすず書房, 2009
ISBN 4622074680, 9784622074687
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VXk2AQAAIAAJ&q=%E4%BB%AE%E5%90%8D%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%80%81%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AE%E5%90%8D%E3%82%82%E4%BC%8F%E3%81%9B%E3%82%8B%E3%80%82%E5%91%89%E4%BA%9C%E6%B4%9E%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%E3%81%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B9%9D%E4%BA%8C%E4%BA%94%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%83%E6%9C%88%E7%94%9F%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E4%BF%9D%E4%BA%AD%E7%9C%8C+A+%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AB%E7%94%9F%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E4%BB%8A%E3%82%82%E3%81%9D%E3%81%93%E3%81%AB%E6%9A%AE%E3%81%99%E3%80%82%E5%B0%91%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE%E9%A0%83%E3%81%AF%E3%80%81%E6%B4%BB%E7%99%BA%E3%81%A7%E6%98%8E%E3%82%8B%E3%81%8F%E3%80%81%E5%8F%8B%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A1%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8A%E5%96%8B%E3%82%8A%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E3%81%AE%E3%81%8C%E5%A4%A7%E5%A5%BD%E3%81%8D%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%AE%B6%E4%BA%8B%E3%80%81%E7%95%91%E4%BB%95%E4%BA%8B%E3%80%81%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E3%81%AF%E7%88%B6%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E7%BF%92%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%B1%B1%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AB%E5%AD%A6%E6%A0%A1%E3%81%AF%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%80%82%E5%AE%B6%E6%97%8F%E3%81%AF%E7%88%B6%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%A8%E5%A7%89%E3%81%A8%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%9B%9B%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E4%B8%80%E5%85%AD%E6%AD%B3%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8D%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%BB%8D%E3%81%AB%E5%BE%B4%E7%94%A8%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E3%80%8C%E6%88%A6%E5%9C%B0%E5%BE%8C%E5%8B%A4%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E9%9A%8A%E3%80%8D%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B%E3%82%82%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AB%E5%85%A5%E3%82%8C%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AE%E8%BF%91%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AE%E9%A7%90%E5%B1%AF%E5%9C%B0%E3%81%B8%E9%80%A3%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%A8%E5%85%B1%E3%81%AB%E6%9D%91%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E4%BA%8C%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AE%E5%A8%98%E3%81%8C%E9%80%A3%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%A7%89%E3%81%AF%E3%81%99%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AB%E5%AB%81%E3%81%AB%E3%81%84%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8B%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E9%A7%90%E5%B1%AF%E5%9C%B0%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AF%E3%80%81%E3%81%BE%E3%81%9A%E9%BB%8E%E6%97%8F%E3%81%AE%E6%9D%91%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E5%8F%8E%E5%A5%AA%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E3%81%8D%E3%81%9F%E7%B1%B3%E3%81%AE%E9%81%B8%E5%88%A5%E3%82%92%E3%81%95%E3%81%9B%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%82%88%E3%81%84%E7%B1%B3%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8F%E3%81%9A%E7%B1%B3%E3%82%92%E5%88%86%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E4%BD%9C%E6%A5%AD%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%85%AD%E3%80%81%E4%B8%83%E6%97%A5%E3%81%9F%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%85%B5%E3%81%8C%E5%B1%B1%E3%81%B8%E9%B3%A5%E3%82%92%E6%92%83%E3%81%A1%E3%81%AB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AB%E5%90%8C%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%95%E3%81%9B%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%81%93%E3%81%AE%E6%99%82%E3%80%81%E5%B1%B1%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8B%E3%81%A7%E3%80%81%E5%85%B5%E5%A3%AB%E5%9B%9B%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AB%E6%8A%BC%E3%81%95%E3%81%88%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E9%9A%8A%E9%95%B7%E3%81%AB%E5%BC%B7%E5%A7%A6%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E6%9C%8D%E3%82%92%E8%84%B1%E3%81%8C%E3%81%9D%E3%81%86%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A7%E3%80%81%E6%B3%A3%E3%81%8D%E5%8F%AB%E3%81%B6%E3%81%A8%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%85%B5%E3%81%AF%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE+%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82+219+%E7%AC%AC+9+%E7%AB%A0%E6%AD%BB%E3%81%AE%E6%81%90%E6%80%96%E3%82%92%E3%81%A8%E3%82%82%E3%81%AA%E3%81%86%E6%80%A7%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B.&dq=%E4%BB%AE%E5%90%8D%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%80%81%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AE%E5%90%8D%E3%82%82%E4%BC%8F%E3%81%9B%E3%82%8B%E3%80%82%E5%91%89%E4%BA%9C%E6%B4%9E%E3%81%95%E3%82%93%E3%81%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B9%9D%E4%BA%8C%E4%BA%94%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%83%E6%9C%88%E7%94%9F%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E4%BF%9D%E4%BA%AD%E7%9C%8C+A+%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AB%E7%94%9F%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E4%BB%8A%E3%82%82%E3%81%9D%E3%81%93%E3%81%AB%E6%9A%AE%E3%81%99%E3%80%82%E5%B0%91%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE%E9%A0%83%E3%81%AF%E3%80%81%E6%B4%BB%E7%99%BA%E3%81%A7%E6%98%8E%E3%82%8B%E3%81%8F%E3%80%81%E5%8F%8B%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A1%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8A%E5%96%8B%E3%82%8A%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E3%81%AE%E3%81%8C%E5%A4%A7%E5%A5%BD%E3%81%8D%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%AE%B6%E4%BA%8B%E3%80%81%E7%95%91%E4%BB%95%E4%BA%8B%E3%80%81%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E3%81%AF%E7%88%B6%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E7%BF%92%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%B1%B1%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AB%E5%AD%A6%E6%A0%A1%E3%81%AF%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%80%82%E5%AE%B6%E6%97%8F%E3%81%AF%E7%88%B6%E6%AF%8D%E3%81%A8%E5%A7%89%E3%81%A8%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%9B%9B%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E4%B8%80%E5%85%AD%E6%AD%B3%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8D%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%BB%8D%E3%81%AB%E5%BE%B4%E7%94%A8%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E3%80%8C%E6%88%A6%E5%9C%B0%E5%BE%8C%E5%8B%A4%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E9%9A%8A%E3%80%8D%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B%E3%82%82%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AB%E5%85%A5%E3%82%8C%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%80%81%E6%9D%91%E3%81%AE%E8%BF%91%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AE%E9%A7%90%E5%B1%AF%E5%9C%B0%E3%81%B8%E9%80%A3%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%A8%E5%85%B1%E3%81%AB%E6%9D%91%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E4%BA%8C%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AE%E5%A8%98%E3%81%8C%E9%80%A3%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%A7%89%E3%81%AF%E3%81%99%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AB%E5%AB%81%E3%81%AB%E3%81%84%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8B%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E9%A7%90%E5%B1%AF%E5%9C%B0%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AF%E3%80%81%E3%81%BE%E3%81%9A%E9%BB%8E%E6%97%8F%E3%81%AE%E6%9D%91%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E5%8F%8E%E5%A5%AA%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E3%81%8D%E3%81%9F%E7%B1%B3%E3%81%AE%E9%81%B8%E5%88%A5%E3%82%92%E3%81%95%E3%81%9B%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%82%88%E3%81%84%E7%B1%B3%E3%81%A8%E3%81%8F%E3%81%9A%E7%B1%B3%E3%82%92%E5%88%86%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E4%BD%9C%E6%A5%AD%E3%81%A0%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E5%85%AD%E3%80%81%E4%B8%83%E6%97%A5%E3%81%9F%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%85%B5%E3%81%8C%E5%B1%B1%E3%81%B8%E9%B3%A5%E3%82%92%E6%92%83%E3%81%A1%E3%81%AB%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AB%E5%90%8C%E8%A1%8C%E3%81%95%E3%81%9B%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%81%93%E3%81%AE%E6%99%82%E3%80%81%E5%B1%B1%E3%81%AE%E3%81%AA%E3%81%8B%E3%81%A7%E3%80%81%E5%85%B5%E5%A3%AB%E5%9B%9B%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AB%E6%8A%BC%E3%81%95%E3%81%88%E3%82%89%E3%82%8C%E3%81%A6%E9%9A%8A%E9%95%B7%E3%81%AB%E5%BC%B7%E5%A7%A6%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E6%9C%8D%E3%82%92%E8%84%B1%E3%81%8C%E3%81%9D%E3%81%86%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A7%E3%80%81%E6%B3%A3%E3%81%8D%E5%8F%AB%E3%81%B6%E3%81%A8%E3%80%81%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%85%B5%E3%81%AF%E5%BD%BC%E5%A5%B3%E3%81%AE+%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A3%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A3%E3%81%A6%E3%81%84%E3%81%9F%E3%80%82+219+%E7%AC%AC+9+%E7%AB%A0%E6%AD%BB%E3%81%AE%E6%81%90%E6%80%96%E3%82%92%E3%81%A8%E3%82%82%E3%81%AA%E3%81%86%E6%80%A7%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B.
 
[quote]仮名とし、村の名も伏せる。呉亜洞さんは一九二五年七月生れ、保亭県 A 村に生れ、今もそこに暮す。少女の頃は、活発で明るく、友だちとお喋りするのが大好きだった。家事、畑仕事、数字は父母から習った。山村に学校はない。家族は父母と姉と彼女の四人だった。一六歳のとき、日本軍に徴用されて「戦地後勤服務隊」なるものに入れられ、村の近くの駐屯地へ連れて行かれた。彼女と共に村から二人の娘が連行された。姉はすでに嫁にいっていなかった。駐屯地では、まず黎族の村から収奪してきた米の選別をさせられた。よい米とくず米を分ける作業だった。六、七日たって、日本兵が山へ鳥を撃ちに行くのに同行させられた。この時、山のなかで、兵士四人に押さえられて隊長に強姦された。服を脱がそうとしたので、泣き叫ぶと、日本兵は彼女の くなった。になっていた。 219 第 9 章死の恐怖をともなう性暴力.
[/quote]
 
[quote]A pseudonym has been used, and the name of her village has been withheld. Wu Yadong was born in July 1925 in Village A, Baoting County, where she still lives. As a girl, she was lively and cheerful, and loved chatting with her friends. She learned housework, farm work, and arithmetic from her parents. There were no schools in the mountain village. Her family consisted of her parents, her older sister, and her girlfriend. At the age of 16, she was conscripted by the Japanese army into a "wartime service unit" and taken to a garrison near her village. Two other girls from her village were taken with her. Her older sister was already married. At the garrison, she was first forced to sort rice seized from a Li village, separating the good rice from the broken rice. After six or seven days, she was forced to accompany Japanese soldiers on a bird-hunting expedition into the mountains. While there, she was held down by four soldiers and raped by the unit commander. When she cried out as they tried to remove her clothes, the Japanese soldiers took her. 219 Chapter 9 Sexual Violence with the Fear of Death[/quote]
 
[quote]中国の少数民族黎族のある少女も、日本軍部隊に拉致され、日々強姦される生活の中で、このような場面を目撃させられている。[6]
 
 
 呉亜洞さん(仮名)は一九二五年七月生れ、保亭県A村に生れ、今もそこに暮す。
 
(略)
 
 一六歳のとき、日本軍に徴用されて「戦地後勤服務隊」なるものに入れられ、村の近くの駐屯地へ連れて行かれた。彼女と共に村から二人の娘が連行された。(略)
 
 駐屯地では、まず黎族の村から収奪してきた米の選別をさせられた。よい米とくず米を分ける作業だった。六、七日たって、日本兵が山へ烏を撃ちに行くのに同行させられた。この時、山のなかで、兵士四人に押さえられて隊長に強姦された。服を脱がそうとしたので、泣き叫ぶと、日本兵は彼女の顔を殴った。さらに銃床で打った。殺されると思って抵抗を止めると、日本兵は服を剥ぎ取って強姦した。下半身は血だらけになった。殴られた左耳はその後、ほとんど聞こえなくなった。
 
 それから、昼間は水運び、洗濯をさせられ、夜は日本兵に強姦される日々が続いた。一晩に五人もの兵士が襲ってきたこともある。生理中でも強姦された。日中、山へ連れていかれ、山の中で強姦されることも繰り返された。そんな時、嫌がったために、谷へ突き落とされ、左腰が岩に当り、歩けなくなった。左骨盤が骨折、今は腰が大きく左へ曲っている。
 
(略)
 
 近くの駐屯地だけでなく、他の駐屯地へ連れていかれて、強姦されたこともあった。大村ダイソンの軍慰安所には七日間監禁され、ザラーンでは四日間、兵舎に監禁され、そこで強姦された。大村の慰安所に送られたとき、ひとりの少女の虐殺を村人と一緒に見させられた。李亜細という少女が逃げようとして、捕まった。川辺に彼女を連れて行き、銃剣で腹を切り裂き、妊娠していた少女の腹の胎児を突き刺した。[/quote]
 
[quote][6] 野田正彰 『虜囚の記憶』 みすず書房 2009年 P.219-221[/quote]
 
[quote]A young girl from China's Li ethnic minority was abducted by Japanese troops and forced to witness similar scenes during her daily rape life. [6]
 
Wu Yadong (not her real name) was born in July 1925 in Village A, Baoting County, where she still lives.
 
(Omitted)
 
At the age of 16, she was conscripted by the Japanese military into a "wartime post-service unit" and taken to a nearby garrison. Two other girls from her village were taken along with her. (Omitted)
 
At the garrison, she was first forced to sort rice seized from Li villages, separating the good rice from the broken ones. After six or seven days, she was made to accompany Japanese soldiers on a crow-hunting expedition into the mountains. During this time, she was held down by four soldiers and raped by the commander. When she cried out as they tried to remove her clothes, the Japanese soldiers punched her in the face. They then hit her with the butt of their rifles. When she stopped resisting, fearing she would be killed, the Japanese soldiers stripped her and raped her. Her lower body was covered in blood. She could barely hear in her left ear, where she had been hit.
 
After that, she was forced to carry water and do laundry during the day, and was raped by Japanese soldiers at night. Once, as many as five soldiers attacked her in one night. She was raped even while on her period. She was repeatedly taken into the mountains during the day and raped there. One time, because she resisted, she was pushed into a valley, her left hip hit a rock, and she was unable to walk. Her left pelvis was fractured, and her hip is now severely bent to the left.
 
(Omitted)
 
She was not only taken to nearby military bases, but also to other military bases where she was raped. She was confined for seven days at the Omura Dyson military comfort station, and for four days at the Zaran barracks, where she was raped. When she was sent to the Omura comfort station, she was forced to witness the massacre of a young girl along with the villagers. A young girl named Li Ya-pi was caught trying to escape, taken to the riverside, her stomach slashed open with a bayonet, and the pregnant girl's fetus was stabbed.[/quote]
 
[quote][6] Masaaki Noda, "Memories of a Captive," Misuzu Shobo, 2009, pp. 219-221[/quote]
 
https://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-08/25/c_1116357332.htm
 
http://china.chinadaily.com.cn/2015-08/25/content_21695331.htm
 
http://dangshi.people.com.cn/BIG5/n/2015/0825/c85037-27511794.html
 
https://tzb.suzhou.gov.cn/tzb/tzdt/201508/aacea6173d004b07b3b98e95fc487f02.shtml
 
https://news.sina.cn/gn/2015-08-25/detail-ifxhcvry1002298.d.html
 
[quote]白山黑水之间,草原广袤,兴安巍巍,是我国古代北方游牧、渔猎民族的历史摇篮,更是12个世居民族的家园,但在日本侵华期间,却成为其为祸最深的地方。在黑龙江黑河,1933年3月,日军以“通匪”“抗日”的罪名,将浦拉口子村全村100多名朝鲜族群众杀死;1937年,又以“私通抗联”为罪名,一次枪杀逊河鄂伦春族猎民14人;1941年,逊河鄂伦春猎民打死两名强奸妇女的日本兵,日军逮捕40多名鄂伦春族同胞,历时一个月施尽酷刑后,几乎全部杀害。在吉林延吉,1931年10月至1933年2月,日军进行大小94次“讨伐”,屠杀朝鲜族革命者和无辜村民1700余人,海兰江畔血流成河。[/quote]
 
[quote]Nestled between the Changbai Mountains and the Heilongjiang River, with its vast grasslands and towering Xing'an Mountains, this region is the historical cradle of ancient northern nomadic and hunting peoples, and home to 12 ethnic groups. However, during the Japanese invasion of China, it became one of the areas most severely ravaged by the Japanese. In Heihe, Heilongjiang, in March 1933, the Japanese army, on charges of "colluding with bandits" and "resisting Japan," massacred over 100 Korean villagers in Pulakouzi Village. In 1937, on charges of "colluding with the Anti-Japanese United Army," they shot and killed 14 Oroqen hunters in Xunhe. In 1941, Oroqen hunters in Xunhe killed two Japanese soldiers who had raped women; the Japanese army arrested over 40 Oroqen compatriots, subjected them to torture for a month, and then almost all of them were killed. In Yanji, Jilin, from October 1931 to February 1933, the Japanese army conducted 94 large and small "suppression" campaigns, massacring over 1,700 Korean revolutionaries and innocent villagers, turning the banks of the Hailan River into a river of blood.[/quote]
 
[quote]广西是多民族聚居的地区,壮、瑶、苗、侗等12个民族世居于此,创造了悠久的历史和灿烂的文化。抗日战争期间,作为中国的南大门,有着重要战略地位的广西曾两次被日军大规模入侵,仅日机投弹轰炸,有据可查的就有564次,目标都是人口稠密、商业繁华的城市和交通枢纽,成千上万的各族群众无辜罹难。在桂林,1939年8月24日,因回族阿訇冯玉卿宣传爱国抗日思想,日军出动48架飞机重点轰炸西外清真古寺和东门盐街清真寺,冯玉卿遇难,回族同胞300余户房屋也尽遭焚毁。在防城港,1939年11月15日凌晨,日军将钦州湾200多艘渔船包围起来,倒上汽油并用军舰炮轰、机枪扫射,船上的京族渔民全部死难。在百色,日机多次轰炸,仅1940年4月8日一天,日军趁靖西县壮族群众赶圩时轰炸化垌圩,造成100多人死亡。在南宁,1940年春夏,日军多次屠杀各族群众并抛尸邕江,动辄数百人,一时江水为之断流。
 
在内蒙古科尔沁、海拉尔,在滇西腾冲,在海南崖县,在贵州黔东南,在察哈尔,在热河,在绥远……日本侵略者所到之处,极尽暴虐之能事,各族同胞家园变成惨烈的修罗场,种种兽行,不忍回顾。[/quote]
 
[quote]Guangxi is a multi-ethnic region, home to 12 ethnic groups including Zhuang, Yao, Miao, and Dong, who have lived there for generations, creating a long history and splendid culture. During the Anti-Japanese War, Guangxi, as China's southern gateway and holding a vital strategic position, was twice invaded by the Japanese army on a large scale. There are 564 documented instances of Japanese bombing raids, targeting densely populated, commercially prosperous cities and transportation hubs, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people from various ethnic groups. In Guilin, on August 24, 1939, because Hui imam Feng Yuqing was promoting patriotic and anti-Japanese ideas, the Japanese army dispatched 48 aircraft to bombard the Xiwai Mosque and the Dongmen Salt Street Mosque. Feng Yuqing was killed, and more than 300 Hui families' homes were burned down. In Fangchenggang, in the early morning of November 15, 1939, the Japanese army surrounded more than 200 fishing boats in Qinzhou Bay, poured gasoline on them, and bombarded them with warships and machine guns, killing all the Jing fishermen on board. In Baise, Japanese aircraft bombed the area multiple times. On April 8, 1940 alone, the Japanese army bombed Huadong Market while Zhuang people in Jingxi County were attending a market, resulting in the deaths of more than 100 people. In Nanning, during the spring and summer of 1940, the Japanese army massacred people of various ethnic groups on multiple occasions and dumped their bodies into the Yong River, often numbering in the hundreds, causing the river to temporarily stop flowing.
 
In Horqin and Hailar in Inner Mongolia, in Tengchong in western Yunnan, in Yaxian in Hainan, in southeastern Guizhou, in Chahar, in Rehe, in Suiyuan... wherever the Japanese invaders went, they committed the most brutal acts, turning the homes of people of all ethnic groups into a tragic battlefield. The atrocities committed were too unbearable to recall.[/quote]
 
[quote]在海南,1939年2月10日,日军在琼山天尾港登陆,短短半个月的时间里,铁蹄踏遍全岛13个主要城镇和各战略要地,使美丽的琼岛生灵涂炭。日军妄图在海南建立航空作战基地,取得对华南的制空权,并切断河内、缅甸两条援华通道,以此扩大对东南亚的战争。同时,为劫掠矿产资源,尤其是用于制造舰艇的优良铁矿,日本侵略者展开了灭绝人性的“大扫荡”和“蚕食”,实行“杀光、烧光、抢光”的“三光政策”,杀害黎族、苗族群众10万余人,焚毁村寨屋宇5万多间,又强迫各族群众无偿为他们修筑据点、扩充军备、开采矿山、筑公路、架电线,使海南各族群众陷入前所未有的灾难中。[/quote]
 
[quote]On February 10, 1939, Japanese troops landed at Tianwei Port in Qiongshan, Hainan. Within half a month, their iron hooves trampled across 13 major towns and strategic locations on the island, plunging the beautiful island of Hainan into devastation. The Japanese army attempted to establish an air base in Hainan, gain air superiority over South China, and cut off the two aid routes to China via Hanoi and Burma, thereby expanding their war in Southeast Asia. At the same time, in order to plunder mineral resources, especially high-quality iron ore used for shipbuilding, the Japanese invaders launched a brutal "mopping-up" and "nibbling" campaign, implementing the "Three Alls Policy" of "kill all, burn all, loot all." They murdered more than 100,000 Li and Miao people, burned more than 50,000 houses and villages, and forced people of all ethnic groups to build strongholds, expand their military, mine, build roads, and erect telegraph lines for them free of charge, plunging the people of Hainan into an unprecedented disaster.[/quote]
 
 
 
Japan invested money into propaganda aimed at Muslims and various ethnic groups across China, trying to incite them to rebel against Han people, and then Japanese soldiers proceeded to assault and rape Muslims and other ethnic minorities and insult their religion and culture.
 
Japanese rubbed pork fat on mosques after raping Muslim girls and massacring Muslims in the mosques. Japan then invested in propaganda and sent fake pilgrims to Mecca to tell Muslims Japan was going to liberate them from colonialism.
 
Japanese soldiers destroyed mosques of the Muslim Utsul people on Hainan as well.
 
https://www.163.com/dy/article/JGSVL3S105528D0S.html
 
[quote]1939年,日本入侵海南岛,在侵占三亚之后大规模建设军事设施,其中就包括“所三亚里”日军机场。
 
居住在当地的占民不得不搬离村落,迁到羊栏地区生活,并在那里形成了新的聚居村“回辉村”(今三亚市凤凰镇上)。
 
 
 
 
▲ 三亚清真古寺,始建于明朝(1470年),后被日寇炸平
 
日本战败后,部分占民重返家园,在原址上重建了“回新村”(回辉村附近)。自此,三亚形成了回辉和回新两大伊斯兰教聚居村,而三亚占族也作为一个整体,成为海南穆斯林群体的重要组成部分。[/quote]
 
[quote]In 1939, Japan invaded Hainan Island and, after occupying Sanya, constructed large-scale military facilities, including the Japanese airfield known as "Suosanya-ri."
 
The local Cham people were forced to relocate from their villages to the Yanglan area, where they formed a new settlement called "Huihui Village" (now in Fenghuang Town, Sanya City).
 
▲ The Sanya Mosque, originally built in the Ming Dynasty (1470), was later bombed and destroyed by the Japanese.
 
After Japan's defeat, some Cham people returned to their homes and rebuilt "Huixin Village" (near Huihui Village) on the original site. From then on, Sanya formed two major Islamic settlements: Huihui and Huixin. The Cham people of Sanya, as a whole, became an important part of the Hainan Muslim community.[/quote]
 
http://haihainan.com/Folk/html/200901/256.html
 
[quote]       清真北寺位于回辉村,始建于南宋初年。礼拜大殿构造仿西寺,正梁骨绘雕成两条威猛巨龙。殿内四柱,正梁均镌刻有《古兰经》经文。正西门四扇,左右两侧各有四个出人口。大殿可容纳100多人礼拜。1939年日军侵琼后被毁。后与清真西寺合建,称西北大寺。是一座具有中国宫殿式风格的砖瓦结构建筑物。 “文化大革命”中一些建筑被毁。1977年,与西寺分开。1981年教徒捐款兴建大殿,1993年扩建为960平方米的清真大寺,能容纳1500人做礼拜。1995年又兴建1000平方米的综合大楼,内设中阿语学校,回民夜校、办公室及学生宿舍等。 
[/quote]
 
[quote]       The North Mosque, located in Huihui Village, was first built in the early Southern Song Dynasty. Its main prayer hall is modeled after Western mosques, with two powerful dragons carved on the main beam. The four pillars and the main beam inside the hall are engraved with verses from the Quran. The main gate has four doors on the west side, with four entrances on each side. The main hall can accommodate more than 100 worshippers. It was destroyed after the Japanese invasion of Hainan in 1939. Later, it was merged with the West Mosque and called the Northwest Mosque. It is a brick and tile structure with a Chinese palace style. Some buildings were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution. In 1977, it separated from the West Mosque. In 1981, believers donated money to rebuild the main hall, and in 1993 it was expanded into a 960-square-meter mosque with a capacity of 1,500 worshippers. In 1995, a 1,000-square-meter comprehensive building was built, housing a Chinese-Arabic language school, a Hui Muslim night school, offices, and student dormitories. 
[/quote]
 
https://www.facebook.com/100076409406590/posts/回辉人中国唯一来自东南亚的穆斯林民族为何扎根海南近千年环球情报员在中国信仰伊斯兰教的穆斯林主要集中在西北地区中国南方的穆斯林群体规模较小即便有也大多都是从西北地/679700007920307/
 
[quote]1939年,日本入侵海南岛,在侵占三亚之后大规模建设军事设施,其中就包括“所三亚里”日军机场。
居住在当地的占民不得不搬离村落,迁到羊栏地区生活,并在那里形成了新的聚居村“回辉村”(今三亚市凤凰镇上)。
日本战败后,部分占民重返家园,在原址上重建了“回新村”(回辉村附近)。自此,三亚形成了回辉和回新两大伊斯兰教聚居村,而三亚占族也作为一个整体,成为海南穆斯林群体的重要组成部分。[/quote]
 
[quote]In 1939, Japan invaded Hainan Island and, after occupying Sanya, constructed large-scale military facilities, including the Japanese airfield known as "Suosanya-ri."
 
The local Cham people were forced to relocate from their villages to the Yanglan area, where they formed a new settlement called "Huihui Village" (now in Fenghuang Town, Sanya City).
 
After Japan's defeat, some Cham people returned to their homes and rebuilt "Huixin Village" (near Huihui Village) on the original site. From then on, Sanya formed two major Islamic settlements: Huihui and Huixin, and the Cham people of Sanya became an important part of the Hainan Muslim community.[/quote]
 
Japanese also massacred Utsul Muslims of Hainan and used them as forced labour.
 
https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar.bib?q=info:jxxLZpkdMR0J:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisdr=ChXbxjJCELCNlbVWIZ0:ABGrvjIAAAAAaQxQOZ1lUmjHw18OnHbQoWBT7Vc&scisig=ABGrvjIAAAAAaQxQOcreS2Z1voSNmpTSjd3u5Ng&scisf=4&ct=citation&cd=-1&hl=zh-CN
https://www.paper.edu.cn/qk/academic/journal/MUTGQF3QMRQVeQIeQeQ?year=2008&cycle=4
https://www.paper.edu.cn/qk/academic/journal/MUTGQF3QMRQVeQIeQeQ?year=2008
 
[quote]孙智伟. 回辉: 回族穆斯林的另一种自我表述. 中北大学学报: 社会科学版. 2008, 24 (4)
 
回辉: 回族穆斯林的另一种自我表述
孙智伟
明末清初,回族社会中一个重要的事情是“释族”和“释教”活动,即解释回族和解释伊斯兰教。在此过程中,伊斯兰教中国化加深,产生了王岱舆、马注、刘智这样“学通四教”的穆斯林学者。他们创造性地解释了伊斯兰教和回族。其中解释“回辉”便是一个重要方面。“回辉”这一概念见于不少碑铭、著述之中。本文将对“回辉”一词的历史意涵和文化表征作一梳理,以彰显回族文化创造的具体过程与特点。
[/quote]
 
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781614516040-009/html?srsltid=AfmBOoonCmJuJ5WrrFCO4f0WAYzqqSNXQSrjdL-UHSbujGZt1WPetTqM
 
[quote]The 1958 investigation notes that when the Japanese invaded Hainan, they built an airport near Sanya and destroyed over 350 of HC mosques and houses. All the Muslims were forced to relocate to Huihui Village. "After the Japanese were defeated, some of the Muslims moved back to where they used to live and some did not, resulting in the only lasting consequence of the Japanese presence, the split of the HC into two villages, namely Huihui and Huixin xillages.
 
"3. Legends and History". A Grammatical Sketch of Hainan Cham: History, Contact, and Phonology, Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014, pp. 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516040-009[/quote]
 
https://www.sanyarb.com.cn/zuixin/2025/08/15/detail_20250815461125.html#:~:text=%E4%B8%BA%E4%BA%86%E5%AE%9E%E7%8E%B0%E9%95%BF%E6%9C%9F%E4%BE%B5%E5%8D%A0%EF%BC%8C%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E6%8E%A8%E5%B9%B3%E4%BA%86%E4%B8%89%E4%BA%9A%E6%B2%B3%E6%B5%81%E5%9F%9F%E4%B8%B4%E6%B5%B7%E5%92%8C%E4%B8%B4%E6%B8%AF%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%AA%E4%B8%AA%E6%9D%91%E5%BA%84%EF%BC%8C%E5%BC%BA%E5%88%B6%E9%A9%B1%E7%A6%BB%E5%8E%9F%E4%BD%8F%E6%B0%91%EF%BC%8C%E4%BF%AE%E5%BB%BA%E8%B5%B7%E4%BA%86%E5%85%AC%E8%B7%AF%E3%80%81%E9%93%81%E9%81%93%E3%80%81%E7%A0%81%E5%A4%B4%E3%80%81%E6%9C%BA%E5%9C%BA%E3%80%81%E5%86%9B%E8%90%A5%E7%AD%89%E5%86%9B%E4%BA%8B%E8%AE%BE%E6%96%BD%E7%BD%91%EF%BC%8C%E6%9C%8D%E5%8A%A1%E4%BA%8E%E4%BB%96%E4%BB%AC%E7%9A%84%E6%AE%8B%E9%85%B7%E7%BB%9F%E6%B2%BB%E3%80%82,%E5%BD%93%E6%97%B6%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%89%E4%BA%9A%E6%9D%91%E3%80%81%E7%95%AA%E6%9D%91%EF%BC%8C%E4%BB%A5%E5%8F%8A%E9%99%84%E8%BF%91%E7%B9%81%E5%8D%8E%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%89%E4%BA%9A%E8%A1%97%EF%BC%8C%E5%8F%AF%E8%B0%93%E4%B8%89%E4%BA%9A%E6%B2%B3%E6%B5%81%E5%9F%9F%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%EF%BC%8C%E5%85%B1400%E4%BD%99%E6%88%B7%E6%B1%89%E3%80%81%E5%9B%9E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%B1%85%E6%B0%91%E7%9A%84%E6%88%BF%E5%B1%8B%E5%92%8C%E5%BA%97%E9%93%BA%E5%9D%87%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E5%BC%BA%E5%88%B6%E6%8B%86%E9%99%A4%EF%BC%8C%E5%B1%85%E6%B0%91%E8%A2%AB%E9%80%BC%E8%BF%81%E7%A7%BB%EF%BC%8C%E5%9C%A8%E9%82%A3%E9%87%8C%E4%BF%AE%E5%BB%BA%E5%86%9B%E7%94%A8%E6%9C%BA%E5%9C%BA%E5%92%8C%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E5%A4%A7%E6%9C%AC%E8%90%A5%E3%80%82%20%E6%B0%91%E4%BC%97%E7%A8%8D%E6%9C%89%E5%8F%8D%E6%8A%97%E5%8D%B3%E9%81%AD%E6%9D%80%E6%88%AE%EF%BC%8C%E5%8F%88%E7%82%AE%E5%88%B6%E4%BA%86%E2%80%9C%E4%B8%89%E4%BA%9A%E9%A3%9E%E6%9C%BA%E5%9C%BA%E5%A4%A7%E5%B1%A0%E6%9D%80%E2%80%9D%E3%80%82
 
[quote]为了实现长期侵占,日军推平了三亚河流域临海和临港一个个村庄,强制驱离原住民,修建起了公路、铁道、码头、机场、军营等军事设施网,服务于他们的残酷统治。当时的三亚村、番村,以及附近繁华的三亚街,可谓三亚河流域的中心,共400余户汉、回民族居民的房屋和店铺均被日军强制拆除,居民被逼迁移,在那里修建军用机场和日军大本营。民众稍有反抗即遭杀戮,又炮制了“三亚飞机场大屠杀”。
 
 
To achieve long-term occupation, the Japanese army leveled villages along the Sanya River and near the port, forcibly evicting the original inhabitants and constructing a network of military facilities such as roads, railways, docks, airports, and military camps to serve their brutal rule. At that time, Sanya Village, Fan Village, and the nearby bustling Sanya Street were considered the center of the Sanya River basin. The houses and shops of more than 400 Han and Hui ethnic minority households were forcibly demolished by the Japanese army, and the residents were forced to relocate. Military airports and Japanese headquarters were built there. Any resistance from the people was met with slaughter, culminating in the "Sanya Airport Massacre."
 
1944年盟军向法西斯发起反攻,三亚的日军基地遭到轰炸,日军将各地朝鲜劳工约1800人集中到南丁村强制劳动。日军战败前夕,将这些劳工悉数杀害,又制造了“南丁千人坑”。
 
 
In 1944, when the Allied forces launched a counter-offensive against fascism, the Japanese military base in Sanya was bombed. The Japanese army concentrated approximately 1,800 Korean laborers from various regions in Nanding Village for forced labor. On the eve of their defeat, the Japanese army massacred all these laborers, creating the “Nanding Mass Grave.”
 
 
1941年,琼崖抗日独立总队第三支队东调,在黑眉岭遭到日伪军截击。支队利用山形地势发动突围,打死打伤日伪军数十人,取得黑眉岭战斗的胜利。1943年,第三支队第一营进驻陵崖保乐边区,在六弓岭伏击日军,毙敌多名。崖县从此有了梅山、仲田岭两处抗日根据地,积极展开反“蚕食”、反“扫荡”斗争。仲田岭抗日根据地是对早期根据地的恢复,他们在敌后积极发展组织,对榆亚地区日军大本营形成直接威胁。
 
In 1941, the Third Detachment of the Qiongya Anti-Japanese Independent Brigade was transferred eastward and was intercepted by Japanese and puppet troops at Heimeiling. The detachment used the mountainous terrain to launch a breakout, killing and wounding dozens of Japanese and puppet troops, achieving victory in the Battle of Heimeiling. In 1943, the First Battalion of the Third Detachment was stationed in the Lingya-Baole Border Area and ambushed Japanese troops at Liugongling, killing many enemy soldiers. From then on, Yaxian County had two anti-Japanese base areas, Meishan and Zhongtianling, actively carrying out struggles against "nibbling" and "mopping-up" operations. The Zhongtianling Anti-Japanese Base Area was a restoration of the earlier base areas; they actively developed their organization behind enemy lines, posing a direct threat to the Japanese headquarters in the Yuya area.
 
据《三亚史》记载:“到1945年上半年,崖县东部陵崖保乐边区的后备队民兵先后出动五六千人次,协助主力部队阻击、伏击、袭击日军200多次,击毙、伤敌千余人,缴获枪支300多支,炸毁汽车10多辆,拆毁桥梁6座,砍断电线杆无数,还缴获一大批弹药、军用物资。”
反“扫荡”期间,崖县国民党武装也在崖县东、中、西线与日军发生过数次战斗。如1942年9月,国民党崖县抗日游击队第一中队对日伪三亚铁路办事处发动夜袭,烧毁各类设施,包括火车机车1辆、卡车15辆、燃料百余箱。在藤桥反“扫荡”斗争中,国军也积极堵截,逼迫来犯的日军最终退回据点。
 
 
According to the *History of Sanya*, "By the first half of 1945, the reserve militia of the Lingya-Baole border area in eastern Yaxian County mobilized five to six thousand personnel to assist the main force in more than 200 ambushes and attacks against the Japanese army, killing and wounding over a thousand enemy soldiers, capturing more than 300 guns, destroying more than 10 vehicles, demolishing 6 bridges, cutting down countless telegraph poles, and seizing a large quantity of ammunition and military supplies." During the anti-"mopping-up" operations, the Kuomintang armed forces in Yaxian County also engaged in several battles with the Japanese army on the eastern, central, and western fronts of Yaxian. For example, in September 1942, the First Company of the Kuomintang Yaxian Anti-Japanese Guerrilla Force launched a night attack on the Japanese puppet Sanya Railway Office, burning various facilities, including one locomotive, 15 trucks, and over a hundred boxes of fuel. In the anti-"mopping-up" struggle at Tengqiao, the Nationalist army also actively intercepted and forced the invading Japanese troops to eventually retreat to their strongholds.
 
1944年,反法西斯同盟在太平洋战场对日军发动反攻,美军飞机不时进入榆亚地区展开侦察,轰炸红沙、榆林、三亚、黄流等日军基地。崖县抗日军民也加快了反攻步伐,对日伪军的袭扰和进攻更加频繁,日伪内部的厌战、反战情绪也在滋长。趁此时机,中共抗日力量深入敌后开展心理攻势、策反敌军。如1944年2月,中共六盘乡支部策反了田独铁矿日军翻译官邱荣华(台湾籍),由他动员台湾籍士兵10多人;9月,邱荣华和10多位台籍士兵秘密潜入田独铁矿日军仓库,搬走10余箱子弹,最终转送到仲田岭抗日根据地。在昌感崖地区,也有台湾籍士兵投诚,配合抗日武装拔除了望楼港的日军分遣队。崖县民众亦不顾危险,对抗日武装和盟军都给予了大力支持,两次成功营救因飞机被击落而跳伞的盟军飞行员。1945年8月15日,日本宣布无条件投降,抗日战争胜利结束,三亚各族人民欢欣鼓舞,为强盗终于离开了这片土地而心情振奋。
 
In 1944, the Allied forces launched a counter-offensive against the Japanese army in the Pacific theater. American aircraft frequently entered the Yulin-Yaxian area for reconnaissance, bombing Japanese bases in Hongsha, Yulin, Sanya, and Huangliu. The anti-Japanese forces and civilians in Yaxian also accelerated their counter-offensive, increasing the frequency of harassment and attacks on the Japanese and puppet troops. Anti-war sentiment was also growing within the Japanese and puppet regime. Taking advantage of this opportunity, the CCP anti-Japanese forces penetrated deep behind enemy lines to conduct psychological offensives and win over enemy troops. For example, in February 1944, the CCP Liupan Township branch won over Qiu Ronghua (a Taiwanese), a Japanese translator at the Tiandu Iron Mine, who then mobilized more than ten Taiwanese soldiers. In September, Qiu Ronghua and more than ten Taiwanese soldiers secretly infiltrated the Japanese warehouse at the Tiandu Iron Mine, stealing more than ten boxes of ammunition, which were eventually transferred to the Zhongtianling anti-Japanese base area. In the Changganya area, some Taiwanese soldiers also surrendered, cooperating with the anti-Japanese armed forces to eliminate the Japanese detachment at Wanglougang. The people of Yaxian County, disregarding the danger, provided strong support to both the anti-Japanese armed forces and the Allied forces, and twice successfully rescued Allied pilots who had parachuted after their planes were shot down. On August 15, 1945, Japan announced its unconditional surrender, marking the end of the War of Resistance against Japan. The people of all ethnic groups in Sanya were overjoyed, thrilled that the invaders had finally left their land.
[/quote]
 
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/254594
https://www.divandergisi.com/tr/Dergi/Makale/30/302
https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/118076/the-chinese-islamic-goodwill-mission-to-the-middle-east-during-the-anti-japanese-war
 
https://www.malaysian-chinese.net/publications/No.13%E2%80%93004.pdf
 
[quote]— 寺、太平路清真寺、汉西口清真寺、长乐路清真寺等寺内,都躺着被日军. 残杀的回民尸体,其中草桥寺最多,有十几具。后,住在难民区豆菜桥28. 号的王寿仁 [/quote]
 
[quote]— The mosques such as the Taiping Road Mosque, the Hanxikou Mosque, and the Changle Road Mosque all contained the bodies of Hui Muslims massacred by the Japanese army. The Caoqiao Mosque had the most, with over a dozen bodies. Later, Wang Shouren, who lived at No. 28 Doucaiqiao in the refugee area, was among them.[/quote]
 
http://ww.6parkbbs.com/index.php?app=index&act=view&cid=10509
 
https://wk.baidu.com/view/b28f15866edb6f1afe001f54
 
https://read01.com/oLykD7L.html
 
[quote]黎远明在回忆1939年8月24日日机48架狂炸桂林后亲眼目睹的劫后惨状时,这样写道:“虽然警报解除了,我惟恐敌机再来,便锁上了门,到独秀峰的读书岩里去躲。沿途看到回族同胞的清真寺中了一颗炸弹,该寺教徒马清卿被炸成重伤后死去。西外清真古寺也被炸,附近民房中弹起火,燃烧了六七个小时,回胞300余户尽遭焚毁。东门外盐街的清真寺也中了一弹,大殿被炸毁,冯玉卿阿訇的住室中弹全部焚毁。
 
[15] 黎明远著: 《我所亲历的一次日军轰炸桂林记》, 见中共桂林市委员会党史研究室著: 《桂林抗战纪实》, 漓江出版社1995 年9 月版, 第178 页。
 
In recalling the devastation he witnessed after 48 Japanese planes bombed Guilin on August 24, 1939, Li Yuanming wrote: "Although the all-clear had been lifted, I feared enemy planes would return, so I locked the door and hid in the Reading Rock on Duxiu Peak. Along the way, I saw that a Hui Muslim mosque had been hit by a bomb, and a Hui Muslim named Ma Qingqing had been seriously injured and died. The Xiwai Mosque was also bombed, and nearby houses caught fire, burning for six or seven hours, destroying more than 300 Hui households. The mosque on Yanjie Street outside the East Gate was also hit by a bomb, destroying the main hall, and Imam Feng Yuqing's room was completely burned down.
 
[15] Li Mingyuan, “My Personal Experience of the Japanese Bombing of Guilin”, in the Party History Research Office of the CPC Guilin Municipal Committee, “A True Account of the Anti-Japanese War in Guilin”, Lijiang Publishing House, September 1995, p. 178.[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1758872765 user_id=116835]
The Japanese prisoner in 1944 also stated that Japan lied about its own deaths from cholera in 1942 in Zhejiang.
 
Japan probably used cholera again against Hengyang in 1944, since Chinese troops in the cities captured Japanese suffering from a massive cholera epidemic.
 
[quote]That afternoon, the 10th Army learned from a Japanese captive speaking some Chinese that Japanese were anxious to end the battle because almost 30% of their troops were suspected to have cholera. That evening, Chief of Staff Sun ordered that the saline drips be stopped for the two Japanese prisoners dying of cholera. Forty-one other prisoners going on hunger strike were shot and sank to the bottom of the Xiang River. Shortly before, thirty-two seriously wounded Chinese soldiers infected with cholera were euthanized. Another 1,000 wounded, suffering from diarrhea, were quarantined in an isolated area at Big West Gate (Chinese: 大西门) and later died in a bombing raid on 8 August.
 
General Fang, Chief of Staff Sun, and Qingxiang Zhou had a long discussion late into the night. Seeing the thousands of wounded men waiting to die simply because of no medicine available and a rapid spread of cholera, they realized that it was time to arrange a ceasefire.[129][/quote]
 
Japan also clearly lied about its casualties again in Hengyang, it claimed 19,000 casualties (for multiple Japanese human wave attacks over one month, two weeks and two days)
 
Japan most likely used cholera infected shells or bombs against Hengyang again despite knowing it would also massacre Japanese, since the number of Chinese was small 
 
16,275
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1758871364 user_id=116835]
In addition to stopping after the destruction of the Shenhe bridge in Dushan, Guizhou, and stopping after the destruction of the Huitong Bridge across the Salween linking Tengchong to Baoshan in Yunnan (and the bombing of their pontoon bridge), Japan refused to press any more offensives into Ningxia after the nightmare battle at Wuyuan and West Suiyuan where Japanese armoued cards and tankettes got caught in sand dunes and hills.
 
Muslim warlord Ma Hongbin's 81st Army and Fu Zuoyi's troops slashed at the Japanese armoued car tires with swords and fought bloody battles in West Suiyuan and Wuyuan.
 
Owen Lattimore himself noted the cowardice of Japanese troops, refusing to fight without mechanised support, and said that their mechanised vehicles stuck and get broken down in the dunes of western Inner Mongolia (West Suiyuan-Ningxia region), when commenting on the battle.
 
Japan wanted to desperately sever the Gansu corridor's road to cut China's border with the Soviet Union and set up the Huihuiguo puppet state in Ningxia, Gansu and northeastern Qinghai, and failed.
 
Its very easy for infantry to cross all these obstacles by themselves.
 
Infantry and horse cavalry crossed the steppes in western Inner Mongolia (West Suiyuan and Ningxia province) all the time throughout history
 
When Wu Sangui fought Li Dingguo in Guizhou and Yunnan, both sides would rapidly build rafts of bamboo or skins to cross the rapidly churning rivers in deep gorges, after bridges were destroyed.
 
Neither of those generals were natives of the area, Li Dingguo came all the way from northern Shaanxi and so did a big portion of his troops (He also recruited local ethnic minorities in Yunnan), but his northern Shaanxi troops from Yulin did fine crossing gorges and rivers in Yunnan and Guizhou in hot malaria infested valleys as well as high cold mountains.
 
Wu Sangui was born in Liaodong and fought there for most of his early life, and his main troops came from there, all the way in northeast China, again in totally different terrain and weather from Yunnan and Guizhou.
 
 
It is also a hallmark of Japanese propaganda in English to claim the "Chiang Kai-shek clique" started the war.
 
Chiang did everything he could to avoid fighting the Japanese. Both the KMT and top levels of the communist party preached the lie that the Japanese Yamato ethnicity weren't at fault, and preached that people should "forgive" the Japanese.
 
If you want to see actual Chinese public opinion on Japanese, after the Soviets invaded Manchukuo, where the KMT and Communist party of China both had zero control, virtually every single Japanese woman and girl was repeatedly raped by local Chinese civilians in addition to Soviet troops.
 
The Soviet army encouraged mass rape, slaughter and torture of Japanese in Manchukuo, there were no KMT soldiers protecting the Japanese POWs.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1757311366 user_id=116835]
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/25/cure-cancer-rhino-horn-vietnam
 
https://www.savetherhino.org/asia/vietnam/behind-the-scenes-save-the-rhino-vietnam-documentary/
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1757311199 user_id=116835]
https://english.kyodonews.net/articles/-/59945
 
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20250828/p2g/00m/0in/024000c
 
https://www.facebook.com/themainichi/posts/indonesia-japan-excavate-remains-of-japanese-soldiers-died-during-war/1322550419874099/
 
https://x.com/kyodo_english/status/1961111536027799623
https://x.com/kyodo_english/status/1960877065210880084
 
https://ryokanworld.com/?p=6221
https://www.facebook.com/groups/164071495837/posts/10160958923965838/
Video thumb

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/shows/3026022/
 
https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/potomac-books/9781612346441/war-crimes-in-japan-occupied-indonesia/
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1756239247 user_id=116835]
https://www.reddit.com/r/ImperialJapanPics/comments/1i5ub1v/american_medic_examining_emaciated_japanese/
 
https://9gag.com/gag/aqjX96v
 
https://blog.naver.com/pzkpfw3485/220405180438
 
https://pzkpfw3485.tistory.com/2241378
 
https://m.dcinside.com/board/aoegame/20002178
 
https://x.com/ailurus_a34/status/1952901618363711508
 
https://www.ilbe.com/view/9477496572?_top_=topc
 
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bk8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA32&dq=grinning+prisoners+navy+man+officer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-p6rwpKmPAxWsaUEAHf-zFq0Q6AF6BAgIEAM
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bk8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA31&dq=grinning+prisoners+navy+man+officer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-p6rwpKmPAxWsaUEAHf-zFq0Q6AF6BAgGEAM
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bk8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA27&dq=grinning+prisoners+navy+man+officer&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-p6rwpKmPAxWsaUEAHf-zFq0Q6AF6BAgHEAM
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PfrgDPhLkqcC&pg=PA69&dq=grinning+prisoners+navy+man+officer&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-p6rwpKmPAxWsaUEAHf-zFq0Q6AF6BAgKEAM
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1756229985 user_id=116835]
https://www.burmalibrary.org/reg.burma/archives/199503/msg00003.html
 
https://www.josephrock.net/2014/11/kawakarpo-outer-kora-part-2-from-aben.html
 
 
 
https://www.chinagsmy.com/China/ruhuajiangshan/21_42_23_394.htm
 
https://m.krzzjn.com/show-2093-102655.html
 
https://blob.wenxiaobai.com/article/181e3ed6-aef8-1ff4-5384-030a4e2bdb58
 
http://www.djnb.cn/journal_articles/view/3832
 
 
 
https://matthartzell.blogspot.com/2014/04/cycilng-lower-salween-river-valley.html
 
https://www.gokunming.com/en/blog/item/3029/songshan-and-the-1944-battle-for-huitong-bridge
 
https://www.yunnanexploration.com/songshan-battlefield-in-longling-county-baoshan.html
 
https://burma-road.com/songshan.html
 
https://burma-road.com/longling.html
 
https://burma-road.com/yunnanyi.html
 
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Command/USA-CBI-Command-9.html
 
https://history.army.mil/Portals/143/Images/Publications/ArmyHistoryMag/pdf/20102019/AH107(W).pdf?ver=tMIzeyJFQdesuz-M3P6nNw%3D%3D%20
 
https://arsof-history.org/pdf/v2n3.pdf
 
 
http://www.dontow.com/2009/08/heroic-and-critical-battles-in-yunnan-during-wwii/
 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt1287cz8
 
http://www.cpamedia.com/article.php?pg=archive&acid=120518152031&aiid=120529165129
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/wwiipics/comments/pbt2hs/a_chinese_soldier_crouches_under_the_shade_of_a/
 
 
 
 
 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000500
 
Video thumb

 
Video thumb

 
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/j/java-sea-campaign.html
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1755579879 user_id=116835]
The Mongols literally had to conquer most of Eurasia, before trying to overwhelm southern China in a decades long war.
 
Mongol armies reached Austria and Hungary in Europe, and annexed Crimea in the Ukraine, and annexed Iraq, while Southern China was still waging war against the Mongols and killed Mongke Khan. 
 
The Mongols literally pillaged the wealth of Korea, Central Asia, Iraq, Anatolia, Ukraine, Hungary in order to fund their decades long war with southern China, which is geographically closer to Mongolia than all of those places except Korea. The Mongols seized their stockpiles of weapons as well for its war with China.
 
The Mongols sacked Hanoi in Vietnam and Baghdad at the same time, while Southern China which was closer to Mongolia, was still waging war on the Mongols and killed Mongke. Mongols were literally in Hanoi and Baghdad, while southern China's capital at Lin'an was under the Southern Song.
 
The Mongols even had to conquer Central Asia before northern China in 1234. Mongols pillaged the resources of Bukhara and Samarqand, to fund a decades long war against northern China, which was closer to Mongolia than Bukhara and Samarqand.
 
The Genghisid family lasted in Chagatai Khanate in Xinjiang until 1680, and the Crimea Khanate until 1783 and Kazakh Khanate until 1847,
 
While the Yuan dynasty lost control of central China in 1351 and all of China in 1368.
 
Yuan dynasty only took Lingxiao fortress in southern China in 1288.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1754370971 user_id=116835]
Ralph Townsend style anecdotes (actually outright lies easily debunked) are considered acceptable to attack China.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2590732#p2590732
 
When attacking Chinese reliability for casualty figures, pro-Japanese incels will start citing Ralph Townsend's book and other writings like it as proof Chinese are liars, instead of actually addressing the topic. (Ralph Townsend invented a completely fictional event of Malay pirates making Chinese evacuate the entire coast, and then cited his own fanfiction delusion as proof that Chinese are cowards and lie).
 
While I have actually posted sources about Japanese lying about casualties, which is on topic. I have posted actual historical events of Japanese lying, backstabbing, prostituting their own girls, while Japanese fans like Townsend write fiction novels and pass it off as history. And then cite their fanfiction about medieval events as proof Chinese are lying about casualties in World War II.
 
"Military historians" like the Romanian Jew Edward Luttwack are doing this now too. Luttwack works for the US government and he openly uses racial insults and writing fanfiction.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited post_id=2590732 time=1752900496 user_id=116835]
People keep forgetting that Japan was not Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany's Nuremberg laws banned Jews from sex with Germans, Jewish men could not have sex with German women or they would be executed in Nazi courts.
 
In Japan, it was always fully legal for non-Japanese men to have sex with Japanese girls and women, including in the middle of World War II where the Chinese male diaspora in Japan continued having sex with Japanese women, like Wang Shifu who continued having sex with his Japanese wife, she gave born to fraternal twins, a boy named Wang Zhenzhi (Sadaharu Oh) and a girl in 1940, and she gave birth to another girl later.
 
William Forbes-Sempill also spied for Japan in Britain and gave Japan military technology, he already openly helped Japan in the Sempill mission to build aircraft carriers and fighter planes.
 
The Japanese also hired US consul Ralph Townsend to write propaganda against China, he wrote a pro-Japan racist book full of lies to attack China and Chinese people. ManfredZhang often tries to push the same crap on here, he tries projecting what Japanese do onto Chinese.
 
He made numerous historical inaccuracies and outright lies in his book, "Ways that are Dark" and often projects the characteristics and habits of the Japanese (lying to save face, cheating, backstabbing, stealing) onto Chinese. Like Hideyoshi who backstabbed and killed his own nephew Toyotomi Hidetsugu and his entire family including his children, when own his son Toyotomi Hideyori was born, when he originally promised his nephew the throne, and Tokugawa Ieyasu in turn backstabbing Toyotomi Hideyori who was his lord, leading to his dearth, and the Japanese North Court Emperors lying and tricking the Southern Court Emperors into giving up their throne. And Japan giving their own girls to foreigners to raise money and spy. Japanese have to lie to save face in their culture, they claim their royal family ruled for 2,600 years, when the first Japanese books like Nihon Shoki and Kojiki were only written after the 7th century and there is absolutely no proof of non-existent Japanese emperors from 600 BC to 600 AD. Chinese records from the Han dynasty and Cao Wei in the Three Kingdoms, record completely different names for Japanese monarchs like Himiko and Iyo, than the names in Nihon Shoki, and record that Japan was divided into multiple petty states, not under one royal family. Those Japanese petty states like Na and Yamatai paid tribute to China, the King of Na accepted a gold seal from the Han dynasty, that said he was the King of the Slave (Na) kingdom of the Dwarfs (Wa), vassal to Han China. Japan didn't even have the term for emperor (Tennō) until it borrowed it from China (Tianhuang) in the 7th century, and retroactively applied it to the fake emperors from the 600s BC like Jimmu Tenno. The term Shinto was also borrowed from Chinese Shendao.
 
He falsely claims Beijing's architecture, walls and palace were built by "invaders" (the architecture that existed during the 1920s and 1930s). Beijing's historical architecture in the 1920s and 1930s was all built by the Ming dynasty. Forbidden city, Confucius temples, Beijing city walls, temple of agriculture and heaven were all built by the Ming.
 
He claims Chinese cheat and use commerce and financial means (interest loans etc.) to win against other ethnicities and are too cowardly to fight. (Japanese are the ones who are obsequious in front of foreigners and superiors, since in Tokugawa era Japan, a samurai could execute Japanese peasants just for the peasant disrespecting the samurai (Kiri-sute gomen). A samurai could also rape a Japanese peasant's wife and commit adultery with her, without punishment, and if the Japanese peasant tried to fight back against the samurai for having sex with his wife, the peasant would be executed instead. And if the peasant slept with the samurai's wife, the peasant would be executed.) Japan also had yobai night crawling, a stranger could crawl into someone's house and impregnate their daughter and leave her. Japanese girls in port cities practice temporary marriage with foreign men. In Meiji Japan, Taisho Japan and modern Japan, Japanese are forced to hide their dislike for anyone under a mask of politeness, not due to them being nice but because their culture is built in servitude and lies, Japanese commoners had to pretend and be polite to the samurai for fear of being killed by them.
 
The Qing navy was dominated by Han people. Chinese sailors in the Dingyuan ship assaulted, killed and beat Japanese police in the Nagasaki incident of 1886, after sleeping with Japanese prostitutes in the red light district. Chinese sailors openly waved their swords and weapons while attacking the Japanese police and refused to concede to the Japanese, instead forcing Japan to pay reparations and to allow Chinese sailors to wield their weapons in public. Townsend claims Chinse were cowards and afraid of violence. A Japanese picked up a Qing Beiyang fleet naval code book that was dropped on the ground after the Chinese slept with the Japanese prostitutes. Chinese troops also openly butchered the Japanese diplomat Sugiyama Akira in Beijing in 1900 after Sugiyama Akira cowardly tried to wiggle away from the confrontation by saying he was going to apologise to their commander. 
 
Han people violently conquered Taiwan from the Dutch in 1661-1662, and violently crushed the Dutch navy at the battle of Liaoluo bay and at the Pescadores Penghu islands in 1622-1624. The Dutch captain Hans Putmans cut his own anchor and fled in fear after Chinese blew up a Dutch ship and stormed and captured another Dutch ship, executing all sailors on board. Chinese violently revolted against the Dutch in Java in 1741 and massacred Dutch troops in revenge for the Dutch massacre of Chinese the previous year. Chinese people also violently assassinated Spanish governor generals in the Philippines in 1593 and 1603, after they tried to force Chinese to row their ships. Chinese forced Spain to abandon the Moluccas (Maluku) in 1662-1663 by threatening to attack the Spanish. The Spanish governor generals said that Chinese were cowards and they could conquer China with 25 men, and then they were slaughtered by Chinese. Those Dutch said the same thing before they were killed by Chinese. 
 
Han peasants killed tens of thousands of Mongols in the Jindandao incident violently in 1891, and then again in the Inner Mongolia incident in 1967-1969. Townsend claimed Han people were too cowardly to fight and seize land by force and were using commercial interests and means to take land and subjugate others. Han people have no problems killing and slaughtering armed men in hand to hand combat. (Those Mongols were all armed with their own bows and swords). Also many of those Han were married to Mongol women since it was mostly single male Han farmers and craftsmen moving to Mongolia.
 
The Japanese are the deceivers who use trade in Hokkaido and gave the Ainu sake alcohol to get drunk and made them dependent on Japanese trade goods (losing the ability to make their own tools from natural stuff in Hokkaido) and trick them into giving up their lands and depleting their own food supply of deer (the Japanese bought all the deer meat to trick the Ainu into becoming permanently dependent on them. Japan would trade sake alcohol and Japanese made iron tools for deer meat and hides, tricking Ainu into killing and exhausting their own native food supply, and to stop making their own tools. The Japanese then seized all the Ainu lands in Hokkaido and the Kurils after destroying their culture and land through trickery and trade, and then massacred unarmed drunk starving Ainu.
 
Japanese are the ones who give their girls to foreigners in exchange for technology. A Japanese blacksmith in Tanegashima gave his daughter Wakasa to Portuguese, to teach him how to make the arquebus musket. There are statues of Wakasa in Tanegashima today. The Japanese gave Japanese girls (Orandayuki-san) to the Dutch, in exchange for Rangaku (Dutch learning, Japanese learned how to build percussion caps and air guns and other scientific instruments from the Dutch). The Japanese were defeated by the Portuguese at Fukuda bay while outnumbering the Portuguese.
 
Chinese defeated the Portuguese in battle in Tamão in 1521 and Veniaga in 1522 and captured Portuguese breach loading cannons (Folangji) and muskets and reverse engineered it themselves.
 
Townsend conflates three different events into one, a Song dynasty era raid by "Malay pirates" (actually Visayan pirates), with the Ming dynasty's sea ban (forbidding outside trade) AND with the Qing dynasty's coastal evacuation.
 
He falsely claimed that "Malay pirates" attacked China, and that they caused China to evacuate its entire coast and flee in terror and that Chinese are cowards.
 
There was no evacuation at all in the Song dynasty in when Visayan pirates attacked coastal port of Quanzhou in southeastern coastal Fujian.
 
The Ming dynasty's sea ban, didn't evacuate the coast at all. It forbade trade with foreigners by closing seaports in order to starve and economically blockade foreigners. Chinese were not evacuated from the seashore to flee pirate attacks. The Ming dynasty wanted all trade to come through tribute missions and ban private commerce.
 
In fact, the first Ming Emperors threatened to invade Japan twice (during the Ashikaga Shogunate), forcing the Japanese Shogun to hand Japanese pirates over to China, to be boiled alive in giant cauldrons in Ningbo in 1405. That was the first wokou pirate wave of actual Japanese led piracy, which was defeated by the Ming. The Ashikaga Shogun feared Ming invasion and turned over the Japanese pirates to be boiled to death.
 
The second Wokou pirate wave in the 16th century was conducted on Chinese pirate ships brought over by Chinese pirate leader Wang Zhi. Japanese ships were inferior and crushed by the Chinese navy. China crushed numerically superior Japanese navies at the battle of Baekgang and battle of Noryang with great slaughter. Japan lost every naval battle to China (while Japan had numerical superiority in those battles) before Britain built Japan's modern fleet in the Meiji restoration.
 
The Qing dynasty's coastal evacuation, was in response to Ming loyalists under Zheng Chenggong based in Taiwan. The coastal evacuation was due to a Han fleet raiding the Qing, not due to "Malay pirates".
 
Also the Qing Manchu Aisin Gioro royal family gave their own girls to Ming officers to get them to defect, Aisin Gioro Manchu princesses were married off to Li Yongfang in exchange for defecting and turning over the city of Fushun, and to the sons of Han generals like Wu Sangui, Shang Kexi, Geng Jimao. Wu Sangui's son received a Manchu princess in exchange for Wu opening Shanhai pass and defecting. Han banner general Nian Gengyao was married to two Manchu women, an Aisin Gioro royal who was the daughter of Duke Aisin Gioro Suyan and a daughter of Nalan Xingde.
 
The Xianbei Tuoba royal family and Xiongnu Juqu royal family all gave their daughters to Han, Sima Chuzhi married a Xianbei Tuoba woman and his son Sima Jinlong married a Xiongnu Juqu woman, daughter of Juqu Muqian. The Xiongnu Xiutu royal Jin Chang married his daughter off to the Han governor Ban Zhi. Xiongnu Qiedihou Changyu married his daughter off to Han General Li Ling. Kublai Khan gave Korean women as wives to Southern Song Han soldiers in Xiangyang (Xinfu jun, newly submitted army), and Kublai gave one of his daughters to marry Zhao Xian (Southern Song emperor Gong). Han general Shi Tianze's sons married Mongol women, Shi Gang married a Kerait woman and another son married the daughter of Mongol official Menggu Baer.
 
It was the opposite of Ralph Townsend said, when he claimed that Han are the ones using devious means against the "barbarians". The "barbarians" are the ones using their women as weapons.
 
Meanwhile, the Jurchens (ancestors of the Manchus) violently raided Japan in the Toi pirate raids of 1019, defeating Japanese outposts, killing Japanese men and seizing nearly 1000 Japanese girls and women to rape as sex slaves. This was while Jurchens (and their Manchu descendants) were bad at naval warfare, the Jurchens lost every naval battle against Han (the Qing navy was staffed and built by Han defectors like Shi Lang). Japanese were even worse at naval warfare before the British built the modern fleet for them in the Meiji restoration.
 
Ralph Townsend was unaware, that Japan was also sending agents to incite Black nationalist African Americans like the NOI against whites like himself. He thought that he was the only agent of Japan in the US and that Japan was going to ally with whites against China.
 
Townsend, who was a white supremacist, also ignored the fact that Japan protected Jews in Harbin and Shanghai and the Dutch East Indies, and was funded by Zionist Jews against whites.
 
Japan also had Britain and the Jewish lobby on its side in the US in the Russo-Japanese war. Jewish banker Jacob Schiff helped Theodore Roosevelt win the Jewish vote in the presidential elections and then Schiff gave Japan emergency loans against Russia and told Theodore Roosevelt to support Japan.
 
Theodore Roosevelt helped negotiate the end of Russo-Japanese the war and signed the Taft Katsuura agreement with Japan, recognising Japan taking over Korea as a protectorate and South Sakhalin, Kurile islands and the Kwantung leased territory from Russia, while Japan would recognise and support US occupation in the Philippines.
 
Theodore Roosevelt also promoted the propaganda book "Bushido: The Soul of Japan" written by Japanese Protestant convert Inazō Nitobe, who deliberately wrote his book to fit western views on chivalry.
 
The Soviet Union, including Buryat Mongol and Central Asian soldiers, killed and displaced 2 million Germans, and raped 2 million German women across East Germany and Austria in 1945.
 
Moroccan Goumier soldiers in the French army then committed mass rape in Italy and against German women across West Germany and Austria. The children of those Moroccan soldiers born to German and Austrian women (Marokkanerkinder) still live in Germany and Austria today.
 
It is a great thing that Ralph Townsend, who cheered on Japan against China, lived to hear about those events in Germany and Austria.
 
Japanese soldiers are tortured, bayoneted and raped gentile goyim Christian Germans, Italians and Spanish during the Manila massacre in the Philippines in 1945, while protecting Jewish women from rape. Jews weren't raped and massacred by Japanese, unlike Japan's own Axis and fascist allies. The German club, Spanish consulate, and Bayview hotel (where Italians, Germans and Spanish women were) were all attacked by Japanese in Manila, who ignored the German men pleading for mercy and waving their Nazi passports while bayoneting them.
 
Nazi SS officers earlier were furious at Japanese not interning Jews in the Dutch East Indies unlike white Christians who were interned. The Japanese only interned them under Nazi pressure, and the Jews had their own kosher kitchen in the camp and were treated better than the non-Jews and weren't raped.
 
The half Japanese Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi called for mixing all white people with black people.
 
Ralph Townsend was busy defending these people like many white supremacist incels and weebs on the internet today jerking off to Japan, which doesn't care about their issues against Jews.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1752825936 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=219432
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=178491
[/quote]
What happened to Curtiss SW 21 fighters?
 
[quote=durb post_id=1983947 time=1450102122 user_id=63264]
Curtiss SW 21 was an attempt by Curtiss-Wright company to build a interceptor fighter with high rate of climb for export markets. It was not particularly succesfull, but China (Republic) bought these fighters paying as much as 70 000 USD a piece.  
 
From the wikipedia we can find following: [i]The prototype CW-21 was delivered to China for evaluation by the Chinese Air Force. The Chinese were impressed by the CW-21's performance, and negotiation started on a Chinese purchase. While these negotiations were ongoing, the CW-21 prototype was flown in combat against Japanese bombers attacking Chungking, with Curtiss test pilot Bob Fausel claiming a Fiat BR.20 bomber shot down on 4 April 1939. In May 1939, a contract was signed, with China receiving the prototype and three complete examples built by Curtiss, as well as kits for 27 more aircraft. Assembly would be undertaken by the Central Aircraft Manufacturing Company (CAMCO) at Loiwing, near the China-Burma border. These were to be armed with two .50 in (12.7 mm) and two .30 in (7.62 mm) machine guns.[6]
 
The three Curtiss-built aircraft were shipped to China in May 1940 and were eventually handed over to the 1st American Volunteer Group (Flying Tigers), who intended to use them to tackle high-flying Japanese reconnaissance aircraft.[7] These crashed and were destroyed, due to poor visibility, on a flight from Rangoon to Kunming on 23 December 1941.[8] Of the 27 to be assembled by CAMCO, none were completed before CAMCO was forced by advancing Japanese forces to evacuate its Loiwing factory to India in 1942.[9][/i]
 
What happened to these airframes?
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=L1E1 post_id=1984058 time=1450157599 user_id=47864]
2 were completed by CAMCO. They were destroyed together with all the parts while the Chinese moved the factory back to China. 
 
The Chinese could only keep those Wright Cyclone R-1820-G5 engines (27) and M2 /M1919 machines guns (54).
[/quote]

 

What happened to Curtiss SW 21 fighters?

  •  
  •  

#1

Post by durb » 14 Dec 2015, 

Curtiss SW 21 was an attempt by Curtiss-Wright company to build a interceptor fighter with high rate of climb for export markets. It was not particularly succesfull, but China (Republic) bought these fighters paying as much as 70 000 USD a piece.

From the wikipedia we can find following: The prototype CW-21 was delivered to China for evaluation by the Chinese Air Force. The Chinese were impressed by the CW-21's performance, and negotiation started on a Chinese purchase. While these negotiations were ongoing, the CW-21 prototype was flown in combat against Japanese bombers attacking Chungking, with Curtiss test pilot Bob Fausel claiming a Fiat BR.20 bomber shot down on 4 April 1939. In May 1939, a contract was signed, with China receiving the prototype and three complete examples built by Curtiss, as well as kits for 27 more aircraft. Assembly would be undertaken by the Central Aircraft Manufacturing Company (CAMCO) at Loiwing, near the China-Burma border. These were to be armed with two .50 in (12.7 mm) and two .30 in (7.62 mm) machine guns.[6]

The three Curtiss-built aircraft were shipped to China in May 1940 and were eventually handed over to the 1st American Volunteer Group (Flying Tigers), who intended to use them to tackle high-flying Japanese reconnaissance aircraft.[7] These crashed and were destroyed, due to poor visibility, on a flight from Rangoon to Kunming on 23 December 1941.[8] Of the 27 to be assembled by CAMCO, none were completed before CAMCO was forced by advancing Japanese forces to evacuate its Loiwing factory to India in 1942.[9]


What happened to these airframes?

 

 

Re: What happened to Curtiss SW 21 fighters?

  •  
  •  

#2

Post by L1E1 » 15 Dec 2015, 

2 were completed by CAMCO. They were destroyed together with all the parts while the Chinese moved the factory back to China.

The Chinese could only keep those Wright Cyclone R-1820-G5 engines (27) and M2 /M1919 machines guns (54).

 

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=178491

Soft skin vehicles in China 1935-1945

[quote="Peter H" post_id=1595096 time=1306832748 user_id=2999]
Chinese auto captured while in transit aboard a junk
[/quote]

 

Chinese auto captured while in transit aboard a junk
Attachments

 

[quote=limited time=1752795437 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=214337
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=189215
[/quote]
Chinese Spitfires?
 
[quote="Peter H" post_id=1701073 time=1337501357 user_id=2999]
http://www.spitfires.flyer.co.uk/china.htm
 
[quote]China asked to buy the Spitfire in 1939 but the outbreak of the Second World War circumvented this.
In 1949 the newly formed Communist Chinese Air Force was looking for modern fighter aircraft, especially P-51 Mustangs and Spitfires. However, the People's Republic of China avoided contact with the West at that time, and therefore the Chinese Government requested Spitfires from the Soviet Union, which had received more than 1,180 Spitfire Mk IX during WWII.
With the beginning of the jet fighter era the Spitfire lost its primary position in the Soviet Air Force and went to reserve units of the Red Air Force. Some Spitfire Mk IXs may possibly have been handed over to the Chinese Air Force but confirmation is lacking. The Chinese administration has not commented and what became of the Spitfires is open to speculation.
[/quote]
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote="YC Chen" post_id=1701095 time=1337505888 user_id=38570]
I don't think China has ever had any Spitfires. However, it is possible that one or two were handed over to China by Russia for training and teaching purpose(lots of strange weapons were given to China as teaching materials by the Russians in 1950s, such as German PAK 38 AT guns and so on).
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=zoboe post_id=1701334 time=1337591875 user_id=54382]
Funny statement - when did Spitfire ever have "primary position" in the Soviet Air Force?
 
Interesting question - why China wanted Spitfire, when Soviet could provide large quantity of Lavochkin 9 and 11? It is like saying, China wanted A-20 Havoc when Soviet could provide Tu-2.
 
Spitfire was definitely not for beginners, and the fledgling PLAAF was not that ignorant.
 
We can rewrite the whole thing as below, which would also appear "may possibly have been...but confirmation is lacking" :lol: 
 
"http://www.valentines.tanker.co.uk/china.htm
 
China asked to buy the Valentine in 1939 but the outbreak of the Second World War circumvented this.
In 1949 the newly formed Communist Chinese Armored Force was looking for modern tanks, especially M4 Shermans and Valentines. However, the People's Republic of China avoided contact with the West at that time, and therefore the Chinese Government requested Valentines from the Soviet Union, which had received more than 2,396 Valentines during WWII.
With the beginning of the medium tank era the Valentine lost its primary position in the Soviet Armored Force and went to reserve units of the Red Armored Force. Some Valentine Mk IXs may possibly have been handed over to the Chinese Armored Force but confirmation is lacking. The Chinese administration has not commented and what became of the Valentines is open to speculation."  :P
[/quote]

 

Chinese Spitfires?

  •  
  •  

#1

Post by Peter H » 20 May 2012, 

http://www.spitfires.flyer.co.uk/china.htm
China asked to buy the Spitfire in 1939 but the outbreak of the Second World War circumvented this.
In 1949 the newly formed Communist Chinese Air Force was looking for modern fighter aircraft, especially P-51 Mustangs and Spitfires. However, the People's Republic of China avoided contact with the West at that time, and therefore the Chinese Government requested Spitfires from the Soviet Union, which had received more than 1,180 Spitfire Mk IX during WWII.
With the beginning of the jet fighter era the Spitfire lost its primary position in the Soviet Air Force and went to reserve units of the Red Air Force. Some Spitfire Mk IXs may possibly have been handed over to the Chinese Air Force but confirmation is lacking. The Chinese administration has not commented and what became of the Spitfires is open to speculation.

 

 

 

Re: Chinese Spitfires?

  •  
  •  

#2

Post by YC Chen » 20 May 2012, 

I don't think China has ever had any Spitfires. However, it is possible that one or two were handed over to China by Russia for training and teaching purpose(lots of strange weapons were given to China as teaching materials by the Russians in 1950s, such as German PAK 38 AT guns and so on).

 

 

Re: Chinese Spitfires?

  •  
  •  

#3

Post by zoboe » 21 May 2012, 

Funny statement - when did Spitfire ever have "primary position" in the Soviet Air Force?

Interesting question - why China wanted Spitfire, when Soviet could provide large quantity of Lavochkin 9 and 11? It is like saying, China wanted A-20 Havoc when Soviet could provide Tu-2.

Spitfire was definitely not for beginners, and the fledgling PLAAF was not that ignorant.

We can rewrite the whole thing as below, which would also appear "may possibly have been...but confirmation is lacking" 

"http://www.valentines.tanker.co.uk/china.htm

China asked to buy the Valentine in 1939 but the outbreak of the Second World War circumvented this.
In 1949 the newly formed Communist Chinese Armored Force was looking for modern tanks, especially M4 Shermans and Valentines. However, the People's Republic of China avoided contact with the West at that time, and therefore the Chinese Government requested Valentines from the Soviet Union, which had received more than 2,396 Valentines during WWII.
With the beginning of the medium tank era the Valentine lost its primary position in the Soviet Armored Force and went to reserve units of the Red Armored Force. Some Valentine Mk IXs may possibly have been handed over to the Chinese Armored Force but confirmation is lacking. The Chinese administration has not commented and what became of the Valentines is open to speculation." 

 

 

 

Chinese forces during Boxer Rebellion
 
[quote=bradley101 post_id=1933339 time=1425787842 user_id=60811]
Hello
Does anyone have any information on the equipment, training, numbers and dispositions of the Chinese forces during the Boxer Rebellion? I know some troops had Mauser rifles and Krupp field guns, but how many, did they only equip part of the formations, and what were there ammunition stocks like?
Cheers
Bradley
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=Stephen_Rynerson post_id=1933440 time=1425834692 user_id=59973]
Bradley,
 
Osprey has done some books that would provide at least part of the information you're looking for.  These ones are in print:
 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1841761818
 
http://www.amazon.com/Boxer-Rebellion-Men-at-Arms-Lynn-Bodin/dp/0850453356
 
Also, while I haven't read it, I would suspect that the British [i]Official Account of the Military Operations in China 1900-1901[/i] (http://www.naval-military-press.com/official-account-of-the-military-operations-in-china-1900-1901.html) would be another good English language source.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote="The 51st Division" post_id=1936658 time=1427328500 user_id=67086]
Bradley,
 
The structure of the Imperial Chinese Army was [i]extremely [/i]complicated and clumsy, and all the dazzling Classical Chinese terms certainly does not help. But since you asked about the guys with Mauser rifles and Krupp guns, here's some general information about Qing China's elite German-trained Wuwei Troop Front Division (武卫前军)...that I know of (WARNING: crazy translations ahead)
 
*The Wuwei Troop was [i]the[/i] most elite force of China, reformed in 1899 (the year of the Rebellion) from the already-pretty-elite Beiyang Army after the Sino-Japanese War, it was arguably the first modern army of China. The Wuwei Troop consisted of 5 "Divisions" (军): Front, Rear, Left, Right, and Centre, of them all, the European-trained and German-equipped Front Division led by general Nie Zhicheng was probably the most elite.
 
*The Front Division consisted of about 16,200 combat personnels and about 4000 non-combatants. 
 
*The Division was then sub-divided into 5 "Routes" (路): Front, Rear, Left, Right, and Centre. The Centre Routes consisted of 7 "battalions" (营)--one artillery and 6 infantry. The rest 4 routes each consisted of one artillery battalions and 4 infantry battalions. Each routes had its supporting branches and were counted as an independent combat unit.
 
*Each infantry battalion had four "companies" (哨), which in turn had three "platoons" (排), which in turn had three "squads" (棚) each consisting of a leader and 12 soldiers. Considering all the non-combatants, each standard battalion should have about 700 men.
 
*Infantry's primary weapon was mainly the Austrian Mannalicher M1985 rifles, and--allegedly, I'm not sure--a limited amount of Kar98, take note that this is [i]not[/i] the Kar98k, but its less famous and less successful predecessor. I'm not too sure about the number of these Kar98s, the internet says it's around 100 or so.
 
*According to Wang Shengling's--Front Division's head of logistic--account [i]芦杨剩稿[/i] (which I won't even bother to translate), the artillery battalions in the Division in total possessed "16 pieces of 7.5cm 12-pdr Krupp guns, 32 pieces of 6cm 7-pdr rear-loading Krupp guns, 32 pieces of 5.7cm 6-pdr Gruson quick-firing guns (an un-famous German field gun with nearly no English information available), as well as a number of 3.7cm 2-pdr Krupp guns and 8.7cm 20-pdr rear-loading guns (wtf is this?). There were also two pieces of 7mm92 Maxim auto cannons (aka machine guns) among the rank."
 
*The Right Division under the command of Yuan Shikai was also western-trained and quite formidable (you'd know a lot about this guy if you study Chinese modern history), the rest of the divisions... not so much. The other three divisions were less well equipped and still under the traditional Eight Banners System.
 
*The Front Division, as well as the Centre and Rear Divisions, engaged rather valiantly with the Eight Nations Alliance during the Boxer Rebellion and suffered severe casualties and later disbanded. This comes back to the old Chinese saying "You can't carve on rotten wood". The problem of Qing Dynasty China was not its military, but its government.
[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1752795099 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=162947
[/quote]
 
Battles, Milo River, Yueyang, Wuhan 1926
 
 
[quote="Jerry Asher" post_id=1430889 time=1266013436 user_id=20221]
I have been trying to come up with a coherent English language narrative of this campaign and would like to share it, I certainly welcome comments, and my personal frustration is the lack of details regarding movements by sampans, junks and motorized vessels.
 
Wei Peifu only began paying attention to Hunan when Jiang added his forces to those of a Hunanese leader.  Then he ordered strong defense lines along the Milo River and the rail road to Wuchang be prepared.
 
Confronting the Milo River defense Jiang relied on Chinese history to make up for his lack of artillery.   Fire rafts were constructed and released offering both cover for his troops and driving the defenders away from the bank.  Other rafts were used on the lake to transport troops and flank the position.  But Jiang also depended on China's future in preparing the men for the battle,  The backbone of his forces were the almost 8,000 literate men whom had gone through advanced military training under his direction and shared a common vision of a unified China.  Jiang addressed them prior to the attack that on them rested, "whether of not the Chinese nation and race can restore their freedom and independence." Most noteworthy too, was his emphasis on speedily exploiting the breakthrough issuing orders to advance into the adjoining Province of Hubei and take Wuhan while the battle of the Milo was still in progress on the 19th.  As a result, the defenses of Yueyang fifty miles above the Milo were still not fully manned nor prepared when overrun on August 22nd.  In particular, controlled flooding that would have denied access to tactical important defensive positions had not been completed.  Only some of the troops were able to evacuate by ship leaving thousands to surrender.  Yueyang was the loss that ought not to have happend.  Belatedly, the regional leader realized that Jiang's drive from the south was a threat to his coalition.  
 
Later day biographies gloss over the conflict.  As if the "warlord" was preordained to fail and Jiang assured of success.  Nothing can be further from the truth. Instead, the fall of Yueyang exposed all the frictions within Jiang's own coalition.  Thus the army that took Yueyang began immediately crossing to the north bank of the Yangzi, effectively cutting Jiang's forces by a third and removing itself from the combat that would have to follow along the rail road to Wuchang.
 
Still esentially a pack and carry force, Jiang had to advance along the rail line or contend with an almost 150 mile trek through steep mountains.  On the 26th, following firece fighting his men took the first bridge.  That night however, thr regional militarist arrived to take personal charge.  The fighting on the  27th was even costlier than the day before although Jiang was able to secure the second bridge.  The showdown occurred on the 30th when Jiang's forces were counterattcked and had to give way.  As Jiang's troops resistance stiffened, another of his forces was able to flank the attackers and force them toretreat.  In fighting that was even more savage than what had preceded it, including desperate had to hand combat, the militarist forces were pushed back over their start line and lost the third bridge.  Bested the defeated militarist, took out his anger on his own officers, having a number of them shot.  Then after providing garrisons and issuing orders for holding Wuhan (Wuchang, Hanyang, Hankou) he crossed the Yangzi to establish a new headquarters some fifty miles of Hangyang.  Jiang's army accepted the surrender of over 5,000 men and all their weaponry.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1432594 time=1266411400 user_id=23554]
Some comments based on Li Zongren's memoirs:
 
[quote="Jerry Asher"]
 
 
Later day biographies gloss over the conflict.  As if the "warlord" was preordained to fail and Jiang assured of success.  Nothing can be further from the truth. Instead, the fall of Yueyang exposed all the frictions within Jiang's own coalition.  Thus the army that took Yueyang began immediately crossing to the north bank of the Yangzi, effectively cutting Jiang's forces by a third and removing itself from the combat that would have to follow along the rail road to Wuchang.[/quote]
 
Indeed the warlords' armies vastly outnumbered Jiang's forces, and at the beginning of the Northern Expedition the warlords were busying fighting themselves in Northern China.  Wu Peifu belated turned his forces to Wuhan, not realizing until too late that his main threat actually came from the south.
 
[quote]
Still esentially a pack and carry force, Jiang had to advance along the rail line or contend with an almost 150 mile trek through steep mountains.  On the 26th, following firece fighting his men took the first bridge.  That night however, thr regional militarist arrived to take personal charge.  The fighting on the  27th was even costlier than the day before although Jiang was able to secure the second bridge.  The showdown occurred on the 30th when Jiang's forces were counterattcked and had to give way.  As Jiang's troops resistance stiffened, another of his forces was able to flank the attackers and force them toretreat.  In fighting that was even more savage than what had preceded it, including desperate had to hand combat, the militarist forces were pushed back over their start line and lost the third bridge.  Bested the defeated militarist, took out his anger on his own officers, having a number of them shot.  Then after providing garrisons and issuing orders for holding Wuhan (Wuchang, Hanyang, Hankou) he crossed the Yangzi to establish a new headquarters some fifty miles of Hangyang.  Jiang's army accepted the surrender of over 5,000 men and all their weaponry.[/quote]
 
The battle on the 26th ended with Jiang's forces stuck south of the bridge.  Near midnight, however, a regimental commander who was able to locate scores of fishing vessels from the surrounding area and the whole regiment crossed over the river undetected at night. At dawn this force surprised the garrison on the northern end of the bridge and put them to flight.
 
Wu Peifu was not really venting his anger on his offiers; he was trying to shoot anyone (commanders in particular) who tried to retreat in order to prevent the rout of his forces.
[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1752795071 user_id=116835]
Re: First plane designed by the Chinese
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1315063 time=1237988150 user_id=23554]
The first airplane designed by the Chinese the Type A Model 1, dating from August 1919.  It is a trainer, with a height of 3.88 m, length 9.32 m, wingspan 13.7 m and maximum speed of 126 km.  Weight is 836 kg with a payload of 1063 kg. Max. altitude 3690 m, range 340 km, can carry four bombs with a crew of two.
 
Picture and information from Tu shuo Zhongguo hai jun shi : gu dai-1955 by Chen Zhenshou, 2002. "Pictoral History of the Chinese Navy : Ancient times to 1955" Vol. 2. p. 504
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=kkfj1 post_id=1320821 time=1239444104 user_id=34613]
I have heard that the first plane designed in China wasn't this one!
Some books and a Taiwan website say the first figter designed in China was called "Gunbus No.1"(枪车1号), also made in 1910s. it was armed with one MG in the nose. It was designed by a famous Chinese engineer(but I've forgot his name). There is a famous photo shows a French officer test the MG of Gunbus No.1. 
Here is the detail of this plane(in Chinese, but with good pics): 
http://cwlam2000hk.sinaman.com/caf02.htm
[/quote]

 

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=94114
Re: First air raid on Japan.
 
[quote=tigre post_id=837894 time=1137915577 user_id=13501]
Hello to all another article
 
On 23 February, Toyko was shocked by the news that Chinese planes, carrying the Far Eastern War to Japanese soil for the first time, had bombed Taihoku, capital of Formosa, and Shinchiku (Figure 2) in the first Chinese air raid, anywhere in the Japanese Empire. It was the first time since 1864, when a British-French-Dutch fleet bombarded Shimonoseki, that the territory of the Japanese Empire had been subject to hostile foreign bombardment.
Formosa lies approximately ninety miIes east of the southeastern coast of China and has been used as an airplane and troop base for Japanese operations in South China.
It was ceded to Japan by China in 1895 as a result of the Chinese-Japanese War, 1894-95. Reports is to the material damage caused by the spectacular raid are greatly contradictory; it has however, bolstered Chinese morale and also furnished evidence of the reorganization of the Chinese air force which now reached such a volume as to enable the Chinese Government again to undertake attacks. Japan has had overwhelming air superiority since the beginning of hostilities and for this reason many observers believe that the raiding planes came from the interior of China and stopped en route at an air field to refuel.
 
Source: The Sino-Japanese War. Military Review, march 1938.
 
Regards. Tigre.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote="Sewer King" post_id=838038 time=1137938543 user_id=7871]
Does anyone know what the leaflets said (in general), that were dropped by Chinese Martin B-10 bombers over Japan?  What became of the bombers in the end -- destroyed in action, on the ground, lost to unserviceability, etc?
 
The British-led allied force that bombarded Shimonoseki in 1864 also included one American warship.  She was the hastily-commissioned [i]Ta-Kiang[/i], a little commercial steamer fitted with one gun.  This rent-a-ship was something of an embarassment to the Americans, who could arrange no better so far away during their Civil War.  But she fought well enough for her captain to be cited by the British commanding admiral.  Shimonoseki was also notable for a first landing of foreign troops in Japan, and into combat besides.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=asiaticus post_id=838393 time=1138002275 user_id=8086]
From Sino-Japanese Air War 1937-45
http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/sino-japanese.htm
 
23 February 1938
On 23 February two groups of SBs (28 from Hankou and 12 from Nanchang) attacked Taibei aerodrome on Taiwan. At Taibei the Japanese were assembling the Fiat BR.20 bombers (designated “Type 1”) bought from Italy and it was decided to try to destroy the new enemy bombers before they could reach the front. 
In the first SB group were only Soviet crews, while the second group was mixed. For the sake of surprise, the course passed north of the island and at the western tip made a sharp right turn and descended with the motors on reduced power to an altitude of 4000 m. Only Polynin’s group from Hankou reached the target. The Nanchang group made a mistake and had to turn back. 
The aerodrome appeared covered in a thick blanket of clouds, but the pilots pressed on and at the last a window opened in the cloud. The Japanese aircraft stood in two rows in the open and to the side of the field were yet unpacked containers. There were no Japanese efforts of camouflage and the SB group dropped 280 bombs. The antiaircraft opened fire late and fighters were unable to take off. Diving lower, the bombers dispersed and flew off to the sea. 
The returning crew reported that saw about 40 assembled aircraft, hangers and a three year supply of aviation fuel burning. It is also reported that the commandant of the aerodrome committed suicide. 
One SB from the Nanchang group was lost. A Chinese pilot after using up all his fuel made a forced landing in a lake which he mistook for the shallow waters of a rice paddy. The entire crew drowned, including the Soviet navigator, M. A. Tarygin (who was also the air group commissar) (according to some sources he is listed as killed on 24 February).
[/quote]

 

 

 

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=142678
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=124694
Re: Update: Dongting Lakes
 
[quote="Jerry Asher" post_id=1090056 time=1185432697 user_id=20221]
A couple of things to share
 
1939   Sept.  two  small Chinese Aux minelayers scuttled in Dongting Lakes at beginning of lst Battle for Changsha  --have names if anyone intrested.
 
1941  Japanese river gunboats Seta and Hira part of support force for 2Nd Battle of Changsha
 
1944  page 413 map in Chugoku homen kaigun sakusen (Naval Ops in China Theatre
         While map shows river gunboats moving east on Pei River? (second one between Yoyang and Changsha)  text offers no elaboration,  (noticed this before in this volume graphics and text are separate )  one often does not pertain to the other.
 
Have redone Page 271 of Pictorial History of  ROC Navy to 1955----provides index of ROC ships as of 1937  ---not in synch with other data it states there are 2 German built torpedo boats on hand (conflicts with just about all other data--most repeated data is that 3 such ships arrived Hong Kong and were interned because of war---one burnt
two taken over by Royal Navy and used in 1941 in defenseof Hong Kong--however this volume also identifies one German built ship in action July 1938 on Yangzi.
 
Perhaps more important than all of the above is   the University of Caloifornia Libraries may have all or almost all of the Japanese language Senshi sosho volumes.. 
enter UCLA Library or any other of the UC campuses
enter Melvyl (an automatic search of all the libraries)
enter Senshi sosho
70 items are listed--there are som cataloging problems --some not all the volumes have series number absent --list however tries to follow series number.
 
Warmest regards to all --Jerry
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1151948 time=1197305331 user_id=23554]
[quote="Jerry Asher"]1944  page 413 map in Chugoku homen kaigun sakusen (Naval Ops in China Theatre
         While map shows river gunboats moving east on Pei River? (second one between Yoyang and Changsha)  text offers no elaboration,  (noticed this before in this volume graphics and text are separate )  one often does not pertain to the other.
 
[/quote]
 
The same map appears with text in another volume of Senshi Sosho, Vol. 16 Ichi-go Operation (pt. 2): Campaign in Hunan (China), which I have been able to acquire recently.  
 
It refers to the supply run via the various rivers during the campaign in Hunan in the Ichi-go Operation in 1944.  The 2,200 men strong 針谷 detachment which consisted of the bulk of the 1st and 2nd battalions plus a platoon of engineers of the 218th Regiment of the 34th IJA Division, was responsible for (among other duties) escorting the transport of the heavy artillery for the siege of Changsha as well as heavy equipment for railway/bridge construction. Due to US aerial superiority, the detachment with its fleet of some 170 river crafts, was confined to nighttime movement starting May 29.  It reached a point 20 km west of Hsinshih [Xinshi] where the water was too shallow (approx 0.5m deep) to continue; the machine guns and light artillery had to hauled ashore and the troops launched an attack on Hsinshih.  Although some of the Chinese defenders were dislodged quickly, some centers of resistance held out until May 31.  The detachment received orders two days later to move up Hsiang [Xiang] River towards Changsha.  When it tried to do so, it was hampered by the extensive mining done by the Chinese; and efforts in minesweeping were met with Chinese fire from the banks. Furthermore, US air attacks increased in intensity.  On June 4 alone, more than 20 US planes attacked the flotilla 10 km south of  Hsiangyin [Xiangyin] and some 18 boats were hit and set on fire; casualties exceeded 80. Nonetheless, despite intensive attacks from the air, the detachment managed to reach the north outskirts of Changsha by June 11.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=rjl3 post_id=1242800 time=1219511436 user_id=32613]
Jerry
I would be grateful if you could provide the names of the 2 aux minelayers sunk in Sep 39 at the Dongting Lakes
Ralph
[/quote]

 

 

 

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=119411
Dongting Lakes/Changsha/Milo River
 
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1048428 time=1177076188 user_id=23554]
Apparently there were quite a few landings in the 3rd Battle of Changsha.
 
In Wang Fu' s 'The Aggression War of the Japanese Army against China' p. 2161 contains an account of the crossing of the R. Milo on May 31. The 133rd Regiment of the 116th Division were to cross the R. Milo with support of the 44th Air Group. Two companies started crossed the river at 1700, starting with the 3rd company and followed by the 2nd company. Although the Japanese used strong artillery support to suppress Chinese fire, many of the landing boats were still destroyed. Despite heavy opposition two battalions were across by late evening.
 
p. 2166 records that the 234th Regiment of the 40th Division sent its 2nd battalion to launch an attack on June 6 from Tsz Jiang with the aid of landing vessels.
 
The American air force was also very active.  Of the 120 boats used by the 40th division for transporting supplies, only 30+ were left after 10 days (i.e. June 8).
 
p.2167 contains a very detailed account of the how the 40th division planned and executed its attack across Lake Dongting using a feint attack to attract the attention of the defenders and then landing at an unexpected (and lightly defended) spot.
[/quote]
 
 
[quote="Jerry Asher" post_id=1048769 time=1177163057 user_id=20221]
Again, many thanks to all of you.
 
For SJChan:  It is very intresting to have your input on the more current Chinese language publications, and I aprreciate your precise sourceing.  May I impose on you?  My particular interest is the war as it involved the rivers, lakes and creeks and harbors of China.  For instance, I am simply astounded by the ability of the New 4th Army, to gather and collect enough sampans and junks to cross the Yangzi.  That a  division size movement, could be organized and carried out in area "occuppied" by Japan simply alters the way I understand any of it, (By the way, that's about all I know of the movement--of course I know of the inter Chinese fighting--butof the actual physical movement of the 4th from the south to the north bank).  
 
Back to Wang Fu's work:  after page 2167 does he mention Japanese ships,  there are from my previous work, gunboats and minecraft--looking for details as to numbers and or names.  Likewise I am sure that there are river obstructions--booms, rocks and man made mines.  Did any Japanese ships use their guns to support the 40th Division assault (page 2166)/   Many thanks-- I know I'm a pain, but it seems to me greater understanding among Americans is only possible if we understand what occurred, and we simply need more data.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1048797 time=1177169353 user_id=23554]
Hi Jerry:
 
My pleasure.  I am happy to do whatever I can to facilitate the production of a more accurate and objective account of any aspect of the Sino Japanese War (based on both Chinese and Japanese sources) in English.
 
Wang Fu did not provide a lot of details regarding the Japanese side.  I will need to dig up some other sources.  
 
Meanwhile, I have something regarding the use of sunken Chinese ships as river obstacles for you.
 
Here's a link toa China Merchants Corp. web site (a major Chinese maritime company in the 1930s, and remains so today!) regarding how their merchant ships were sunk as barriers (including some photos of a ship sunk at Madang).  
 
http://www.cmhk.com/library/dspnews.asp?newsid=4101&type=C
 
The text contains a list of their ships sunk at Jiangyin on Aug 11, 1937 for this purpose, they totalled some 13,706 tons ot of the 43,968 tons (7 ships out of the 24) sunk.  At Madang, in April 1938 18 ships (totaling some 24,995 tons) with a load of rocks and tied together with iron chains were sunk to block river traffic.
 
Actually the battle of Madang is a fairly celebrated battle to the Chinese in several aspects; it was poorly fought (the commander of the 167th division was court-martialed afterwards), poison gas was used extensively (according to the Chinese) etc.  Will have more for you if you are interested.  Need a bit of time to check my sources.  I try to cross check my stuff and / or rely on reputable works as much as possible.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1049777 time=1177392308 user_id=23554]
I do not know how to get this book, perhaps you can try some on-line bookstores; I have on-line access to the e-book version through a local library.  The information of the book is: 中华民国海军史事日志 / 苏小东编著. Publisher  北京 : 九洲图书出版社, 1999. 
 
Regarding Hsu' book on the war, since it really is a condensed verision of the Nationalist Official History of the 2nd Sino Japanese War, it has many of the places/names and perhaps events correct.  But what makes it unsatisfactory to me is the angle from which it is written, plus lots of omissions.  It is certainly a useful starting point, but it is pretty depressing that nothing better has appeared since.
 
I came across an article titled roughly "Using Sunken Ships for Blocking Rivers and Ports in the Early Stages of the War of Resistance: Circumstances and Evaluation" which contains some additional material to supplement the execellent posts by Windward.  I attach the most relevant excepts below:
[/quote]

 

Re: Chinese use of the da dao
 
[quote=huirtd post_id=1387477 time=1255960385 user_id=38816]
Hi,
 
I am an Australian currently in China trying to put together a research proposal for PhD work on Chinese military history. My main interest is actually arms and armour but that is a difficult subject to get university backing for. I am hoping someone can help me with a few queries I have. 
 
1. Firstly, does anyone know if anything has been published (in English or Chinese) regarding the military use of the 'dadao' 大刀 during the 1900's (i.e. war against Japan, communist/nationalist struggles)? If so, would you be kind enough to pass along any bibliographical details you have. Anything you have regarding primary sources would also be of great benefit. 
 
2. I am also interested in the Japanese military swords (shin-gunto) used in the same period and especially any Japanese references to the Chinese use of the 'dadao'. 
 
3. Do you know of any academics studying weaponry/martial systems as an academic subject at a university in Australia (or anywhere)? 
 
 
Thank you any help you can provide would be extremely appreciated. 
 
Regards, 
 
Douglas...
[/quote]
 
 
[quote=ikkispirit post_id=1390581 time=1256723851 user_id=14911]
Dadao were firstly  used  when  Boxer Uprising 
The event of "Burning the Old Imperial Palace" took place in the late Qing Dynasty. It is one of the crimes committed by the Anglo-French Allied Forces when they invaded China in 1860, and also, an appalling culture-destroying activity in modern Chinese history.
 
Located in the northwestern suburb of Beijing, the Old Summer Palace was a royal garden as well as a grand and beautiful palace. Covering an area of over 5000 mu, the Old Summer Palace was a model of Chinese architectural art and culture. Due to the numerous invaluable treasures preserved in it, the Old Summer Palace could be rated as one of the human's cultural treasure house and the largest museum in the world.
 
The Old Summer Palace was plundered and burned twice by foreign invaders starting from 1857 when the Anglo-French Allied Forces launched the invasive war against China. On October 6, 1860, they attacked Beijing and rushed in the palace to carry out crazy plunder. After robbing the palace off nearly all treasures, Elgin, the English minister plenipotentiary ordered to burn the palace. It was almost burned down after being on fire for three successive days and nights. What the Anglo-French Allied Forces directed at was razing the Old Summer Palace to the ground. Nevertheless, due to its huge size and scattered scenic spots as well as vast water area, some remote places and spots on water managed to survive this disaster. According to the investigation performed in the winter of the twelfth year of Tongzhi's reign (1873), there still existed 13 buildings in the palace. The Old Summer Palace suffered another burning in the 26th year of Guangxu's reign (1900) in the Qing Dynasty when the Eight-Power Allied Forces invaded Beijing and burned the already disastrous palace. As a result, the remaining 13 buildings in it were plundered and set on fire.
 
This catastrophe was deprecated by Hugo, a famous French author in this way: "One day, two robbers rushed into the palace. One was busy in robbing, and the other taking pleasure in setting fire. Then they returned cheerfully to Europe. They are respectively called France and Britain. They "shared" the Old Summer Palace, the oriental treasure house, and chuckled to themselves with the view that they have achieved a great victory!"
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=ikkispirit post_id=1390588 time=1256724529 user_id=14911]
The eight nations  Britain France Japan Russia Italy Germany and Austria-Hungary  invaded China in 1900 When boxer used Dadao.
And When Japanese invaded China from 30th in 20 century, the 19th army first used da dao to kill Japanese.
[/quote]

 

 

[/quote]

 

 

 

[quote=limited time=1752794734 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=94112&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=105
[quote=asiaticus post_id=894494 time=1147155525 user_id=8086]
Map (above ) and notes from campaign account from: Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) 2nd Ed. ,1971. Pg. 300-303.
 
 
According to Hsu Long-hsuen, the the various Chinese War areas supported the Offensive to retake Nanchang by offensives to tie down Japanese troops.  5th War area in particular attacked the Southern sector of the Peiking-Hankow RR from the east and west. 
 
5th War areas 21st Army Group under Liao Lei operated as guerrillas from a base in the Honan, Hupei, Anhui border area east of the Peiking-Hankow RR. 
 
North and West of Wuhan the 5th War area had its front under the command of Li Tsung-jen. It ran from the north bank of the Yangtze across from Yuehyang up to the mouth of the Han River and up the west bank of the Han and Xiang River to Chunghsiang then northwest south of Chingshihchiao into the Tahung Mountains then to Huochiatian via chehotien then north to the Tungpo Mountains.  North of the Tungpo range the 68th Corps of the 1st War area kept the Japanese forces on the railroad at  Hsinyang under obsevation.  
 
The 5th War area at the end of April detected the buildup of Japanese forces for an offensive. 16th Division massed at Chung-hsiang, Yang-tze Chen and Tung-chiao Chen, 13th Division at Anlu, the main force of 3rd Division at Ying-shan and north of Hsi-ho Chen, and the balance of 3rd Division at Hsin-yang.  4th Cavalry Brigade was massed in the area north and south of the Hankow-Ichang Highway. 
 
DISPOSITIONS AND PLANS
To meet this threat 5th War Area halted their offensive operations and began to redeploy to counter it. 
 
River Defense Force under Kuo Chan was deployed to defend the southern part of the Han River from Shayang to the Yantze and the north bank of the Yangtze from the Han River to Sha-shih and Icheng, including a garrison at Ching-men northeast of Icheng.  
 
North of Shayang the west bank of the Xiang River to Chunghsiang then northwest to the Tahung Mountains was held by a the Right Flank Force commanded by Chang Tze-chung, composed of the 33rd Army Group and 29th Army Group. 
 
The Left Flank Force composed of the 11th Army Group held the line from the Tahung Mountains (39th Corps) aross the plain to Huochiatien then north to the Tungpo Mountains(84th Corps).  
 
68th Corps holding the area north of the Tungpo Mountains was attached to 2nd Army which kept its 30th Corps in reserve. 
 
31st Army Group under Tang En-po backed up 11th Army Group with the 13th Corps in the area of Tienho, Kao-cheng, Tienwangtien. 85th Corps was held further west near the Tungpo mountains at Wu-shan Chen and Lu-tou Chen as a reserve. 
 
22nd Army was also kept as a mobile reserve between Changkangtien and Tsao-yang. 
 
Li Tsung-jen planed to use the mountains as strongpoints to hold the enemy up with positions in depth awaiting some of the enemy force to enter the Sui-Tsao Basin and then shift to a concentric attack to cut them off and destroy them.  
 
JAPANESE OFFENSIVE
 
On 30th of April the Japanese 3rd Divisin attacked the 84th Corps at Hao-chia-tien and Hsu-chia-tien. After a days fighting they 84th Corps fell back westward to positions near Ta-erh-wan.  On May 2, the Japanese attacked 13th Corps at Kao-cheng but was halted but attacks at Ta-erh-wan continued for four days, involving poison gas, which caused heavy casualties among the Chinese.  After abandonng Ta-erh-wan and Kao-cheng the two corps fell back behind the Pi-ao River. On May 5th the Japanese attacked Tien-ho-kou but has halted by 13th Corps. On May 6th there was bitter fighting along the Lishan Chian-chia-ho line but the Japanese did not advance. 
 
Meanwile to the south on 33rd Army Groups front the Japanese concentratd 16th and 13th Divisions and 4th Cavarlry Brigade and fell on the positions of the 37th and 180th Divisions at Chang-kung-miao and Lou-tse-miao. Heavy fighting lasted 4 days, when Japanese forces penatrated to Liu=shui-kou contacting elements of the 38th Division. By the 7th of May the Japanese force had pushed north and captured Tsao-yang deep in the Chinese rear area.  Racing north they captured Hu-yang Chen and Hsin-yeh on the 10th and Tang-ho and Nan-yang on May 12. 
 
Additionally the 29th Brigade/3rd Division had advanced from Hsinyang and captured Tungpo on May 12. Thus the Chinese forces in the Tungpo Mountain region were surrounded on three sides. 13th Corps stayed to hold the Tungpo Mountains while the remaining troops fell back to the north.  Also 39th Corps was isolated in the Tahung Mountains.
 
CHINESE COUNTEROFFENSIVE
 
Li Tsung-jen now ordered the 33rd Army Group and 39th Corps to cut the enemy rear between the Xiang River and Tahung Mountains. 2nd Army was to attack from Hsinchi and Paoanchai against Tangho and Nanyang.  In the face of these converging attacks the Japanese began to retreat to the east suffering heavy casualties and losing succesively Hsin-yeh, Nan-yang, Tang-ho, Tsao-yang, and Tung-po. By May 20th the original frontlines were restored.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=asiaticus post_id=894495 time=1147156340 user_id=8086]
Here is an Expedia topo map of the larger Sui - Tsaoyang Campaign area.  
 
 
This site makes even more detailed maps of an area but they are smaller areas. Go to:
 
http://www.expedia.com/pub/agent.dll
 
Select maps:
 
Place name: Suixian [Suizhou], Hubei, China
[/quote]

 

 

 

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=116779
[quote=ImperialDarkness post_id=1026617 time=1172560754 user_id=23385]
Hi, I have a research paper to do on the Battle of Changsha.  I've looked on the internet, but I haven't really been able to find much except for the general things.  I noticed that the people here know a lot about every aspect of the Second World War.  So, I was hoping if someone could provide me with information regarding the Battle of Changsha.  Whether it is general or detailed, all is appreciated.  I know I'm not making it any easier by not specifying what exactly I want to know, but I don't know much to begin with (just basically what I could find on Wikipedia).  Please tell me anything about the battles, and thank you very much for your time.
 
-Edward Huang (aka ImperialDarkness)
 
P.S. If I'm violating any rules, I appologize ahead of time and please tell me.  I'm new to this forum. :oops:
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote="Jerry Asher" post_id=1026782 time=1172585981 user_id=20221]
As a school librian somewhat intriqued by your question--I don't know the ethics either.
Is this secondary or college?
Changsha is not one battle but either three or four.
This is one straight from my mind, ( I haven't seen it in print in my reading)  Note geopraphically the Pentagon (NO- not the US, the shape) Poyang Lake-Wuhan (Hankov)-Dongting Lakes-Changsha-Nanchang.  It is and certainly for the Sino-Japanese War of 1937-45 the fulcram.  It is the center that allows one to consider going in any direction in China.  Changsha is the western orbit--it is a better north-south route than even Nanchang.  The success of the Chinese to hold in 1939, was psychologically all important to the legitimacy of Jaing Jhishe.  Am typing without classes, as I've just awakened--hope this isn't jibberish.
By the way I'm intrested in its naval aspects.  Let me know if you have stuff.  If forum members thing helopint on a term paper i okeh,  I can send other ideas and details.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=asiaticus post_id=1027647 time=1172742831 user_id=8086]
Well we've covered the first battle  in 1939 here in our Campaigns in Detail thread on page 8 and 9: 
 
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=94112&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=105
 
Havent got to the other three battles yet,
 
The 2nd and 3rd Battles were in 1941 and the last in 1944,
[/quote]

 

 

 

Re: US Army Topo maps of China circa WWII
 
[quote=asiaticus post_id=1050134 time=1177474176 user_id=8086]
Check out this web site.   Has topo maps of most of the area of combat for the 2nd Sino-Japanese War and Chinese Civil Wars too..  
 
China 1:250,000
 
Series L500, U.S. Army Map Service, 1954-
 
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/china/
[/quote]
 
[quote=sjchan post_id=1089614 time=1185342729 user_id=23554]
Well, there is a counterpart to the excellent US maps, this time in Chinese and done by the Chinese army and surveryors.
 
I came across this at a well-known Chinese military history forum
 
http://www.fightersalon.net/bbs/showthread.php?p=124090#post124090
 
The link of the map database, hosted in Taiwan, which contains over 30,000 maps is 
 
http://webgis.sinica.edu.tw/map_moi/default.asp 
 
The interface is bit hard to use.  A typical approach (there are others) is to enter  the map collection name (a good try is to use the name of the province, as noted in the original post) using the first line and then the map name (typically name of the village or geographical feature of note) using the second.  It is particulary useful if one wants to just look up the topology of small hamlets or big cities without knowing their exact location, however you do have to know the Chinese names.
 
Each map has a unique id.  For instance
 
http://gissrv1.sinica.edu.tw/map/bin/show.pl?client=map_moi&image=11904.sid
 
gives you a map of Hengyang city (map id 11904), which you can zoom in. It's all Chinese though, folks.
 
Seems like you have to use their viewer and the image cannot be downloaded, but I really haven't try it out too much yet.
[/quote]
 
 

 

 

 

[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1752730423 user_id=116835]
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=153454&start=30
Re: Chinese weapons since Opium War to the Era of Warlords?
 
[quote=twraia post_id=1335659 time=1243348475 user_id=36306]
Hello guys
I know that my question here doesn't really fit into the time frame given in this category... but I am wondering
if anyone has seen or perhaps have photograph of Chinese armed forces from the first opium war to the era of warlords?
 
most of the picture of opium war I've seen were painting, with only limited exceptions
 
it would be great if anyone could share these priceless photograph with us :) 
 
the themes that I am interested in are rebellion forces within China (Taiping Rebellion - supposedly armed with some western weapons?)
and Chinese conflicts with the West - British v China in the first opium war, France-Britain v China in the second, the boxer rebellion-lead invasion...etc
 
cheers :D
[/quote]
 
 
[quote="Peter H" post_id=1592222 time=1306131313 user_id=2999]
From: http://photo.nanguow.com/20101227/8372.html
[/quote]

 

 

Re: The War in Pictures
 
[quote=oirob post_id=1600996 time=1308310745 user_id=40918]
From the Sidney D. Gamble Photographs collection of the Duke University:
http://library.duke.edu/digitalcollections/?facet=Subject=soldier
 
Simply titled "Feng's soldier":
 
gamble_442A.jpg
[/quote]

 

 

[/quote]

 

 

[quote=limited time=1752363430 user_id=116835]
1931年,被日军缴获的东北军部分装备
 
http://www.360doc.com/content/23/0215/07/66175384_1067710853.shtml
 
https://www.163.com/dy/article/ECJDROM40544518Y.html#:~:text=1931%E5%B9%B4%E4%B9%9D%E4%B8%80%E5%85%AB%E4%BA%8B%E5%8F%98%E4%B8%AD%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%9C%E5%8C%97%E5%86%9B%E9%83%A8%E5%88%86%E8%A3%85%E5%A4%87%20%C2%B7%201%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E5%85%A8%E8%87%AA%E5%8A%A8%E6%B1%A4%E5%A7%86%E6%A3%AE%E5%86%B2%E9%94%8B%E6%9E%AA%E5%92%8C%E6%89%8B%E6%A6%B4%E5%BC%B9%E3%80%82%20%C2%B7%202%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E8%BD%AE%E5%BC%8F%E5%A4%A7%E5%8F%A3%E5%BE%84%E8%BF%AB%E5%87%BB%E7%82%AE%E5%8F%8A%E7%82%AE%E5%BC%B9%E3%80%82%20%C2%B7%203%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E5%86%9B%E5%88%80%E5%8F%8A%E9%9D%92%E9%BE%99%E5%88%80%E3%80%82,4%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E9%98%BB%E5%87%BB%E7%82%AE%E3%80%81%E9%9D%92%E9%BE%99%E5%88%80%E5%92%8C%E9%AA%91%E5%85%B5%E5%9B%A2%E5%86%9B%E6%97%97%E3%80%82%20%C2%B7%205%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%BA%E5%85%B3%E6%9E%AA%E5%92%8C%E8%BD%BB%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%AA%E3%80%82%20%C2%B7%206%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7%E7%9A%84%E6%AD%A3%E8%A7%84%E5%86%9B%E7%9A%84%E5%85%B5%E5%99%A8%E5%8F%8A%E5%86%9B%E8%A1%A3%E7%AD%89%E7%89%A9%E3%80%82%20%C2%B7%207%E3%80%81%E8%A2%AB%E6%97%A5%E5%86%9B%E7%BC%B4%E8%8E%B7
 
 
 
 
https://m.krzzjn.com/show-1188-88669.html
 
 
https://www.zhihu.com/question/22380567/answer/30640214
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited time=1752363059 user_id=116835]
https://k.sina.cn/article_5075579048_p12e8730a802700flw0.html
 
https://m.krzzjn.com/show-1192-116733.html
 
https://www.163.com/dy/article/ECJDROM40544518Y.html
 
 
 
 
 
https://www.sohu.com/a/585956272_120546417
 
https://www.bilibili.com/opus/978429331406585863
 
http://www.360doc.com/content/21/1029/18/37844335_1001835599.shtml
 
https://inews.ifeng.com/yidian/46888298/news.shtml
 
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/465004044
 
https://m.krzzjn.com/show-1188-71041.html
 
 
 
http://www.360doc.com/content/24/0120/15/71830597_1111698566.shtml
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=limited time=1752310001 user_id=116835]
http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/2866/1/74.pdf.pdf
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=limited time=1752309967 user_id=116835]
https://k.sina.cn/article_5075579048_p12e8730a802700flw0.html
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1658310#p1658310
[/quote]

 

 

Re: New discovery on Chinese homemade helmets
 
[quote="YC Chen" post_id=1637990 time=1318690211 user_id=38570]
Hello all, 
I have just find this photo in a book published in 1932. These soldiers with helmets were from 5th Army which was in Shanghai at that time. 
The date of most photos showing Chinese homemade helmets can't be varified easily, but this photo couldn't be taken after 1932 because the book itself was published in that year. This can tell us two things: 
1, This kind of helmets were definitely not inspired by German M35 as M35 was not introduced until 1935. 
2, At least most of this kind of helmets(if not all) were made for Chiang's "central" forces.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote="YC Chen" post_id=1658310 time=1324703610 user_id=38570]
Yes, I agree. Many different helmets have appeared in photos, for example, there are also photos of Chinese soldiers wear helmets that resembled Japanese type in 1932. 
An interesting question is when Chinese army started to use helmets. Adrian helmets were used in Warlord Era, and I have also read that NRA used helmets as early as 1928. Here is a Japanese postcard showing Chinese helmets captured in Manchuria in 1931.
[/quote]
 
 
 
[quote=JCB99 post_id=1660719 time=1325467490 user_id=39897]
The Chinese Nationalists copied an early Japanese french pattern helmet called the Cherry blossom helmet. The chinese copy was called the Plum blossom. Here is a picture of that Chinese Nationalist Plum blossom helmet. It has a flower like vent cover device on top. 
 
Chinese Nationalist Plum blossom helmet.
[url=http://postimage.org/image/n4s133gwb/][img]http://s17.postimage.org/n4s133gwb/chinese_plum_blossom_helmet.jpg[/img][/url]
 
 
Here is the Japanese cherry blossom helmet. Note the decorative flower vent device on top. 
[url=http://postimage.org/image/mng6985w5/][img]http://s10.postimage.org/mng6985w5/cherryblossom.jpg[/img][/url]
 
These pictures came from old ebay auctions. 
Jim
JapaneseOrdnance(at)yahoo.com
 
japanese ordnance:  http://www.castle-thunder.com/wforum/viewtopic.php?t=976
[/quote]

 

 

 

Salween campaign West Yunnan 1944 Tengchong Mount Song Songshan

 

 

 

 

http://14usaaf27tcs.4mg.com/SALWEEN.htm

 

The result of these innovations was a rapid reduction of the Jap stronghold. Assisted by 14TH Air Force fighters carrying bombs, the Chinese took the hill, captured a considerable quantity of material, killed or wounded an estimated 600 Japs and, in addition, repulsed a 300-400 man Jap counterattack in the early hours of the 27TH .

 

By the latter part of July, the Chinese had moved to within a half-mile of Tengchung on all sides, capturing a number of small villages and fortified positions in the process. Two days later they wee at the walls of the city.

 

This operation received considerable assistance from the 14TH Air Force, which several times bombed and strafed the Jap garrison using bombers as well as the fighters which rendered the chief support in the Kaolikung.

 

Other Chinese forces moved south toward Lungling, capturing large stores of Jap ammunition at Shangmenglin, ten miles southeast of Tengchung and then continuing south to effect a juncture with the XI Army Group.

 

Guerrilla forces, operating to great advantage during the first two months of the campaign, occupied Chang Hsi, 26 miles west of Tengchung and only 25 miles from Sadon, held by advance elements of General Stilwell’s armies in North Burma.

 

Guerrilla operations were very successful in destroying Jap communications and supply lines and in general harassing the enemy.

 

During the fourth month of operations the assault on Tengchung continued with increasing fury. The U.S. 10TH Army Air force joined the 14TTH in air assault, breaching the 35-foot-high walls by skip-bombing and strafing the Japs within the city.

 

Through the breaches pored the Chinese, to join in bitter house-to-house, hand-to-hand fighting. The hundreds of pillboxes on the walls and in the compounds within the city were eliminated one by one, in some cases by pouring gasoline through tiny embrasures and then firing it with flamethrowers.

After a 51 day siege, Tengchung fell on September 14. Of an estimated 2,600 Japs, including 50 officers, only a few escaped to be tracked down and subsequently eliminated, and only 50 were captured. A number of Japanese soldiers committed suicide.

 

In addition to the soldiers, 13 women were taken. Fifteen pieces of artillery, including heavy mortar and anti-tank guns, were captured, as well as over 50 machine guns, more than 800 rifles, 14 trucks and seven radios.

 

During the period from the crossing of the Salween on May 11 to September 10 just before the fall of Tengchung, the XX Army Group had lost an estimated 8,000 men killed.

 

SUNGSHAN PEAK BLOWN UP

 

In the south, the other Army had been brought from the French Indo-China front to relieve the units of the XI Army Group attacking Sungshan. On August 20, Chinese engineers under direction of Y-Force officers had tunneled under the main Jap position in two places, planted 6,000 pounds of TNT, and blown the peak and its defenders into oblivion.

 

This was the opening blow in the final assault, which ended with the exterminating of the Jap garrison on September 7. Of the estimated 23,000 Japs on Sungshan nine were captured, ten escaped. The Chinese suffered 7,675 casualties on Sungshan and the adjacent peaks, owing to the exceedingly difficult nature of the terrain and the extremely strong defenses of the enemy.

 

A considerable amount of material was captured, including a large store of blankets discovered later in a covered pit. Several women were captured here as in Tengchung.

 

The reduction of Sungshan opened the Burma Road to Lungling, allowing direct supply by road of the Chinese forces in that area. During the siege of Sungshan supplies for Lungling were trucked to Sungshan, packed around the base of the mountain and then trucked on captured Jap trucks further forward.

 

By August 10 the troops at Lungling had contacted the XX Army Group forces moving 


south from Tengchung and were closing in on the city from three sides, assisted by the American 14TH and 10THArmy Air Forces, who rendered excellent assistance to the CEF ground forces.

 

The battle for the hill positions around both Lungling and Manshih seesawed, with the Chinese gradually pressing forward.On August 22 the old town of Lungling, just north of the city proper, had been taken by the Chinese.Strong Jap reinforcing columns began moving against the Chinese on August 26 from the Mangshih area and despite bitter opposition forced the Chinese back for the second time. At the end of the forth month of operations, the Japs had regained many of the mountain positions at terrific cost to themselves, and controlled a small sector of the Lungling terminus of the Lungling-Tengchung road.

 

There were literally scores of attacks and counterattacks and the entire Lungling Mangshi area was in a state of flux with the Japs suffering heavy losses because they were forced to attack the hill positions, strongly fortified which they had previously lost to the Chinese.

 

Fighting for the first few days of the fifth month, from September 11 to September 15 was exceedingly heavy around Hanchang, a village on the Tengchung road about three miles north of Lungling. Chinese resistance stiffened, and patrols entering Hanchang on September 15 found that the Japs, having suffered excessive casualties, had withdrawn, leaving over 400 bodies in that village alone.

 

Chinese reinforcements, flown to Paochan and then trucked or marched from there to Lunglind, arrived in the area and by the end of September the Chinese had regained all of the ground lost previously and held a general line just west of Hsiangta, eight miles east of Mangshih, and again were poised on three sides of Lunglind.

 

Pingka, surrounded since July, was taken during this period. On September 22 a column of 500 Japs was reported near the town and at 2 A.M. te next day, the garrison began to evacuate. The Chinese forces immediately moved into the town, and dispatched units to pursue the withdrawing enemy columns.

 

On September 25 the main Jap body reached Mangshih, after suffering some casualties.

From this date until October 24, there was little ground activity in the Lunglind-Mangshih sector although the 14TH Army Air Force struck continually and persistently at the Burma Road beyond Mangshih, and at the Jap supply lines and storehouses from Mangshih to Wanting, causing an estimated 1,0000 Jap casualties in one ten-day period.

 

Except for minor skirmishes and patrol activity, the Chinese during this period regrouped their units, collected supplies and organized for the final assault on Lungling.

 

The attack on Lungling was launched October 29.Expertly supported by the 14TH Air Force, the Chinese forces took a hill two and a half miles southwest of Lungling as well as three hilltops three miles southwest of the city. In the Mangshih area, all except one Jap position on Hungyuenshan, three miles northeast of the city, had been taken by night fall. This position was taken the following day.

 

American planes throughout the attack continued to fly bombing and strafing sorties against the Japs and on the night of November 2-3 the remaining Japs in Lungling withdrew. Chinese forces marched into Lungling early in the morning of November 3, 1944. They found a shattered city, with scarcely a building standing intact.

 

Bombers of the 14TH Air Force continued their attacks on Manghih, Chefang and on Jap storage areas in Wanting, and there were minor sorties, attacks and counterattacks in the vicinity of Mangshih. Mangshih was taken on November 20 and Chefang on December 1, 1944. At year’s end the fighting was in progress on the very border of Burma, with Japs cleared from Yunnan province north of the border line.Wanting fell after midnight January 20, 1945. This was the virtual close of that phase of the combined Chinese-Burma operations known as the Salween Campaign.

 

 

http://www.nytimes.com/1944/07/10/archives/foes-losses-high-on-salween-front-40-to-45-of-the-japanese-killed.html

FOE'S LOSSES HIGH ON SALWEEN FRONT; 40 to 45% of the Japanese Killed or Wounded in the Burma Road Battle

 

  • Share full article
  •  
  •  

By Brooks Atkinsonby Wireless To the New York Times.

  • July 10, 1944
FOE'S LOSSES HIGH ON SALWEEN FRONT; 40 to 45% of the Japanese Killed or Wounded in the Burma Road Battle
Credit...The New York Times Archives
See the article in its original context from
July 10, 1944, Page 7Buy Reprints
New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.
*Does not include Games-only or Cooking-only subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

HEADQUARTERS, CHINESE EXPEDITIONARY-FORCE, July 8 (Delayed)—Between 40 and 45 per cent of all Japanese troops on the Salween front have been killed or wounded since the Chinese offensive began May 11, according to informed sources here. The campaign to open territory for land communication to China goes slowly, but it steadily pares away enemy strength. Despite delays and reverses, it remains one of the most creditable Chinese military operations since the Sino-Japanese war began seven years ago. Although there have been no spectacular developments in the fighting of the last two days, the Chinese are still making slow gains at Tengyueh, Lungling and Sungshan. The last communication line from Tengyueh is now cut. Chinese guerrillas and regular troops have blocked the road to Bhamo, depriving the enemy of the last chance to escape or to evacuate wounded, who are reported to be numerous in Tengyueh.

 

Chinese Certain of Victory

 

Fighting in the southeast area has brought the Chinese closer to the wall of the beleaguered city. After seven weeks of successful fighting, the Twentieth Group Army, infected with a spirit of victory, perhaps prematurely, regards Tengyueh as easy picking after the bloody, agonized battle at Tatangtzu, Mamien Pass and Hungmoshu. In the Sungshan area, where several sturdily built Japanese fortifications have blocked the Burma road west of the Salween River since June 4, the Chinese last Friday stormed and captured the Tayakou positions and all but one pillbox on Kunglungpo, using American flame throwers, bazookas and demolition charges. One small corner of the main Sungshan fort is reported to be still in Japanese hands. Since these fortifications are stormed at night, the Chinese are unable to count the number of enemy dead, although the Japanese remaining alive are thought to be few. Twice during Friday's fighting the Japanese emerged from their defenses. The Chinese fought them with bayonets, cruel weapons that suit the Chinese better than the Japanese.

 

Americans Trained Chinese

 

Gen. Hsiao I-hsu, Chief of Staff of the Chinese Expeditionary Force, gives credit to Brig. Gen. Frank Dorn and his United States Y Force for helping train Chinese troops for the current assaults. By means of this standard American plan, the assaults have been succeeding with light losses, in contrast to other methods that failed for four weeks with heavy losses. Around Lungling, where the Eleventh Group Army has been marking time for a month, the situation seems to be improving also. The Japanese, who had been conducting offensive defense operations there, now are withdrawing to defensive positions. The Twentieth and Eleventh Group Armies were supplied from the air Friday by a troop-carrier squadron of the United States Fourteenth Air Force.

 

 

https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=189

 

References

 

 

 

 

 

JOHN WHITE HERSTINE, Captain, U. S. Army, of 2707 North Broom Street, Wilmington, Delaware, son of A. Wilson and Blanche Herstine, husband of Sarah (Buchanan) Herstine. Killed in action September 12, 1944, at Tengchung, China serving as an Infantry officer training and commanding Chinese troops in the China-Burma-India Theatre. He served two years, eight months and was decorated with the Legion of Merit.

 

 

 

Video thumb

 

 

 

 

[quote=limited post_id=2628444 time=1781908075 user_id=116835]
[quote]it's almost entirely on the China front where reality fails to adhere to chauvinistic Chinese accounts of their history.[/quote]
 
I didn't use a single Chinese source in this thread when exposing Japanese lies. Everything on Zhejiang in 1942, west Salween in 1942, OSS funded operations near Kaifeng in Henan in 1945 are from US participants or from interrogation of Japanese.
 
AVG pilots saw Japanese dead and wounded litter the Salween gorge as they were bombed, strafed and attacked by Chinese ground forces in May 1942 as they tried to cross the Salween into Baoshan, Yunnan. They said the Chinese forces on the east bank pushed back the Japanese in huge assaults across the Salween and forced the Japanese to flee, and that they strafed and bombed columns of Japanese vehicles fleeing all the way back to Wanding on the Burma border.
 
American observers also noted a mass Japanese bioweapons attack against Baoshan in May 1942 with cholera and bubonic plague, at the same time Japan killed its own troops in Zhejiang with mass cholera attacks in May 1942 since Japanese troops attempted to quickly seize the areas bombarded with cholera bombs. Japan launched biological weapons in areas Japanese were preparing to invade, like at Changde in 1943. There is no way Sakaguchi was acting against orders by crossing the Salween, he had the Japanese army air service dropping bioweapons for him. Japan intended to fully occupy areas they bombarded with bioweapons with ground troops, as shown by their cholera weapons in Jinhua, Zhejiang and Changde. They were defeated at the Salween and forced to retreat by Chinese troops who refused to flee despite the bioweapons.
 
Post-war Japanese documents edited by Japanese nationalists then claimed Japan never intended to cross the Salween, and assumed that Americans would not have recorded anything about the battle and all accounts about it were Chinese so they could dismiss all accounts as "Chinese propaganda". Japan pretends to the Salween battle never happened, but some foreigners thought Sakaguchi was acting against orders when he ordered the crossing, when its clear he had full authorisation to cross with Ishii's latest bombs delivered to him.
 
Senshi Sosho claims that Chinese troops fled deep into Yunnan far beyond the east bank of the Salween in May 1942, and falsely attributes this statement to the US war history, when AVG pilots say Chinese troops actively raided Japanese truck and tank columns on the west bank of the Salween and forced the Japanese into retreating all the way to Wanding. They stood their ground and didn't flee before the cholera and bubonic plague bombs, China never abandoned Baoshan or the Salween's east bank.
 
Japanese nationalist revisionists assumed that the OSS operations behind the front lines in China were conducted and supplied entirely by China, and weren't recorded by Americans, so no one would notice over 2,000 Japanese dead in a single operation and they could dismiss it as Chinese propaganda.
 
You were claiming there was zero controversy regarding Japanese death tolls from American sources when every single source that contradicts you is American.
 
Japanese were making up fantasy death tolls about Americans too during the war, falsely claiming they shot down dozens of American bombers over Tokyo and killed thousands with balloon bombs, its just that since Japan lost the war and was occupied by the US Japan doesn't dare blatantly claim Japan killed 1 billion Americans in Pearl Harbour otherwise Japan would.
 
Senshi Sosho mistranslated the US war history and left out the entire part about Japanese killing and eating their own comrades.
 
[quote]drawn-out discriminatory and schizophrenic blogpost.[/quote]
 
ManfredZhang was doing this unchecked for decades on this forum and all Japanese users here were agreeing with it and never reported him, the difference is that his posts are full of lies and events that never happened just like Nihon Shoki while I have not lied about anything or posted alternate reality fanfiction.
 
And all of the sources you use to "debunk" Chinese numbers on Taierzhuang etc., are Japanese sources. The same Japanese military denied it lost Taierzhuang in 1938.
 
Japanese military officers personally told western journalist Robin Hyde at Xuzhou that Japan suffered major casualties while the official Japanese military report claims only a few thousand killed. US military officer Frank Dorn estimates over 20,000 Japanese were killed in Xuzhou.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2626204#p2626204
 
 
[quote=adachi post_id=2628438 time=1781904878 user_id=89715]
[quote=limited post_id=2628359 time=1781851007 user_id=116835]
Also I reported you for this.
[quote=adachi post_id=2623428 time=1777842499 user_id=89715]
Derailing the thread again with the same unrelated examples. 
Neither are backed up by empirical evidence. While the testimony of a prisoner or a diary may have merit, neither of these examples presented have been verified with other eyewitnesses or supporting documents. Whether you like it or not, dying as a Japanese soldier in WWII left a paper trail. It's no coincidence there's no controversy regarding the death tolls of Japanese garrisons facing the Americans, it's almost entirely on the China front where reality fails to adhere to chauvinistic Chinese accounts of their history.
[/quote]
[/quote]
 
The difference is I can academically say this without delving into a drawn-out discriminatory and schizophrenic blogpost.
Just for one example, after the Battle of Sihang Warehouse the Chinese commander Xie Jinyuan reported they had killed an excess of 100 Japanese troops.[1] However, the IJN's records indicate only one officer suffered fatal wounds during the battle and there were no others KIA. Furthermore, western journalists and the USMC stationed nearby did not report of any fatal Japanese casualties during this battle.[2] So in this battle we can determine the Chinese side exaggerated the damage they inflicted to the enemy by a factor or 100. Despite modern research disproving such incredulous claims, the Chinese Communist Party still repeats it in their official history.[3]
[quote]"10 月下旬,据守苏州河北岸四行仓库的谢晋元等八百壮士孤军奋战四昼夜,[b]杀敌数以百计[/b],后突破敌重重包围,退入英租界"
 
"In late October, Xie Jinyuan and the Eight Hundred Heroes held the Sihang Warehouse on the north bank of the Suzhou Creek, fighting a desperate battle for four days and nights and [b]killing hundreds of the enemy's troops[/b]. They eventually broke through the enemy's encirclement and retreated into the British Concession."[/quote]
 
This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are other battles like Taierzhuang where the Chinese boasted killing and wounding 20,000 Japanese troops[4] despite this exceeding the number of Japanese troops fielded in the area.[5] Despite this, it would be foolish to assert the Chinese people are all liars and it is culturally engrained in them like you write about Japanese. If you truly feel that way you have no purpose on this subforum as the Japanese sources we discuss here should all be lies and useless to you.
 
 
1. Zhongyang Ribao, Nov 1 1937, accessed via https://archive.org/details/zhongyang-ribao-1937.11.01/page/n1/mode/2up
2. Adachi Austin, Sihang Warehouse: How China’s Famous Battle was Faked, accessed via https://medium.com/@austinadachi/sihang-warehouse-how-chinas-famous-battle-was-faked-4473c7f1d6ee
3. 中共中央研究室, 中国共产党历史 第一卷 (History of the Chinese Communist Party - Vol I), page 294
4. 防衛庁防衛研修所戦史室 編, 支那事変陸軍作戦<2>昭和十四年九月まで (China Incident Army Operations II (Until Sep 1939)), page 41
5. 姜克實, 台児庄作戦の概観 (Outline of the Taierzhuang Strategy), accessed via https://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/ja/54962
 
 
 
[quote="Eugen Pinak" post_id=2628384 time=1781871761 user_id=9376]
Austin, have you seen detalization of this well-known table below? 
It has breakdown not just by regions, but by date of death: before/after 15 August 1945. Maybe there are data broken down by the year.
And yes, such data exists - I've seen it for the Iwate Prefecture.
[/quote]
 
I think I have seen this one or one like it before. Once again it is proof we have detailed data out there, it's just a matter of seeing if we can access the records used to compile it and present it in a more detailed format. I definitely want to take a trip in the near future to the Imperial Household Archives and investigate the awards records used to compile the KIA data Wu Jingmao posted about.
[/quote]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[quote="Eugen Pinak" post_id=2628384 time=1781871761 user_id=9376]
[quote=adachi post_id=2628352 time=1781843429 user_id=89715]
Having physically gone through the rosters kept at home for units (留守名簿) I can attest that the notion of annihilated units having no record because the families back home died in air raids is patently false. The 43rd Division for example, which was destroyed in the Marianas with few survivors and its home city of Nagoya thoroughly destroyed in American air raids, has extremely detailed surviving records, and unsurprisingly KIA troops with no family are still listed. 
 
There are legitimate issues with service records being lost during the war but there was two entire demobilization bureaus working to determine who died, who survived, and who was still missing. 
[/quote]
 
Those, who spread myth about "tricky Japanese, hiding their war dead" ignore the fact, that personal data on every Japanese military person, killed/died in combat zone, was NOT kept by his relatives. It was a government-held information, shared to Yasukuki shrine and local Gokoku shrines.
 
So complete "disappearance" of the dead soldier from the official records required SIMULTANEOUS destruction of the records, held at:
1) Personnel Bureau of Army/Navy Ministry,
2) Regimental district/Naval district,
3) particular unit or even several units,
4) soldier's family (together with whole family and friends, who can inquire about soldier's fate),
5) Yasukuki shrine,
6) local Gokoku shrine,
7) often also at soldier's local shrine,
8) often also other records, like hospitals, courts, etc.
+ maybe there were trapes in other records I don't know.
 
Also, after the war soldier and his whole family have to be SIMULTANEOUSLY forgotten by:
1) Unit's veterans association,
2) local neighborhood association,
3) extended family,
4) Pension service
5) post-war surveys by various bodies (last one was in 1991).
 
I've yet to imagine, how this is even possible. But it seems there is nothing impossible for the propagandist! ;)
 
 
[quote=adachi post_id=2628352 time=1781843429 user_id=89715]
Approaching this from random claims in various memoirs and not actually acknowledging the systems in place to handle war dead is not the right way to go about this. I have reported limited for spamming and encourage others wishing for a productive discussion to do the same.
[/quote]
 
Limited is smart enough not to cross moderators attention in his Japonophobic propaganda. So I don't think it'll help  :( 
 
But lets return from the propaganda to the history.
 
Austin, have you seen detalization of this well-known table below? 
It has breakdown not just by regions, but by date of death: before/after 15 August 1945. Maybe there are data broken down by the year.
And yes, such data exists - I've seen it for the Iwate Prefecture.
 
[img]https://hoshino2019.com/bigf/gunb.jpg[/img]
[/quote]
 
Okinawans were regularly conscripted into the Japanese military at all levels and branches of service since the Meiji era, just like Yamatos (unlike Koreans and Taiwanese).
 
As I repeatedly mentioned, entire family registry records were destroyed in the battle of Okinawa and over one third of Okinawa's population was wiped out in the battle of Okinawa and both Okinawan and Yamato Japanese settlers in Mindanao were massacred in 1945 by natives like Lumads and Moro Muslims.
 
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol25/7/25-7.pdf
 
[quote]The situation is more complex in Okinawa, as most of the old Koseki were destroyed during WW II and a provisional Koseki was reconstructed both by American authorities in Okinawa and Japanese authorities in Fukuoka. As will be explained later, only following the return of the territory to Japan in 1972 was the new Koseki unified and can it be considered fully operational in Okinawa.[/quote]
 
[quote]The key data source for age validation is the Koseki, in which the date of birth is originally recorded. However, a large majority of original Koseki was destroyed at the end of WW II. The particulars of the reconstruction of the Koseki in Okinawa after 1945 are therefore crucial to assessing the reliability of the current sources of age data.[/quote]
 
[quote]According to Nishihara (1977), almost all of the Okinawa Koseki were destroyed during WW II – original documents as well as copies. Maeda’s more recent research (2004) found that only 5 of the 41 municipalities, constituting less than one tenth of the population of Okinawa, had intact original documents.17 Six other municipalities had some original Koseki.[/quote]
 
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13764
 
[quote]In the case of Okinawa, the question was raised already two decades ago [52]. Briefly, it may be summarized as the following: In Japan, the age of a person is identified based on the Koseki, the family registry that includes the individual birth records of all family members. During the Battle of Okinawa, most Kosekis on the island were destroyed. Temporary Kosekis were reissued, not only as family and civil status registers but also for the distribution of food rations and to fix the list of Okinawans who would be asked to help the American army. Nishihara [66] conducted an in-depth analysis of the circumstances of the reconstruction of the Koseki in Okinawa and concluded that this reconstruction had been done within a very difficult context due to the loss of documents destroyed during the war but also due to the poor coordination between the US Administration in Okinawa and Japan thereafter. He highlighted several problems encountered when reissuing Koseki, including false declarations of age. Matsuzaki [25] also addressed the reliability of information extracted from the Koseki and mentioned that he found several errors in date of birth. These statements indicate a fairly high risk that the age data recorded in reconstructed Koseki – not being based on original documents of birth – may have differed somewhat from the person's actual age which would confirm Okinawa's status as a Longevity Blue Zone [67]. The above-mentioned arguments questioning the validity of extreme ages of Okinawans have been refuted by Willcox et al. [68] and Robine et al. [69]. Their contra-arguments are based on the fact that some age heaping, the absence of too extreme age at death or exceptionally high proportions of centenarians aged 110+ compared with 105+ and 105+ compared with 100 as well as unusual sex ratio of centenarians were not found. These indicators supported the existence of an exceptional population longevity in Okinawa, as all observed figures ranged within reasonable values. However, these arguments – even if necessary – are not direct proof that all data are correct, and these are not sufficient for the validation of exceptional population longevity. Even if individual age validation is quite difficult in Japan because of limited access to original individual data sources, cross-checking individual data from independent data sources is crucial for identifying a statistically significant number of alleged centenarians [70].[/quote]
 
https://okinawans-hawaii.weebly.com/how-to-apply-for-japanese-family-registry.html
 
[quote]In 1872, following the Meiji Restoration, the koseki was instituted, mandating the registration of family names and as well as given names. As it was about this time period that Okinawa emigration had begun, all families would have possessed their families' koseki. However in 1945, the World War II Battle of Okinawa devastated almost all of the town and village offices where kosekis were stored and thus many kosekis were destroyed. Some families, fortunately kept copies in their possession. Others had attempted to recreate their koseki based on memories of relatives who survived the war. As a result, these re-created kosekis may be erroneous or incomplete. In my own experience helping peoples to obtain their koseki, only about 50% have been successfull for Okinawan families, while for mainland Japanese it has been over 90%.[/quote]
 
https://www.bluezones.com/news/are-supercentenarian-claims-based-on-age-exaggeration/
 
[quote]The large scale US-bombing and invasion of Okinawa involved the destruction of entire cities and town, obliterating around 90% of the birth and death records.[/quote]
 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0531556513001356
 
[quote]Are the reported centenarian numbers in Okinawa accurate?
Quoting Poulain (2011) Le Bourg questions centenarian numbers in Okinawa and states that the “main possible cause of error is the reconstruction of the population registers following widespread destruction in World War 2” and that it was probably because “the US staff could have misreported the age of the Okinawans who were in their forties or older because these citizens probably appeared older than they really were due to the traumas of WW2”. [/quote]
 
https://theworld.org/stories/2024/12/10/fake-news-unpacking-the-blue-zone-myth-in-okinawa
 
[quote]“I mean, there’s no doubt in places like [Okinawa], records would have been destroyed over time,” Dooley said, adding that he’s heard about Newman’s research on the Blue Zones. [/quote]
 
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12709677/
 
[quote]many birth records were destroyed during WWII bombings,[/quote]
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/Genealogy/comments/1h0eouz/japanese_genealogy/
 
[quote]rubberduckieu69
2y ago
I completely understand where you're coming from. My father is full Okinawan, and to be candid, his family tree is a little disappointing. I have so many older relatives still living and I wish I could share more information with them, but there's simply no information left to share. Sometimes, I almost feel like a poser because most of the information I've found, they already knew. A few key details:
 
A lot of family records from mainland Okinawa were destroyed during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. Therefore, not many records before 1945 survive. I've requested all of my family records, and they're all 1945 and onward, but I have heard of other families (from the same villages too) having better luck.[/quote]
 
Japan admitted that  234,354  people it claimed were alive are dead, some died decades ago right at the end of WW2.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/10/japenese-centenarians-records
 
[quote]The survey uncovered 234,354 centenarians who are listed as still alive but whose addresses could not be confirmed. Ministry officials suspected some deaths went unreported in the confusion that followed the end of the second world war, while other people may have lost touch with relatives or moved overseas without informing the authorities.[/quote]
 
 
Japanese girls from Hiroshima working in Kure munitions factories were the only survivors of their families after the atomic bombs were dropped.
 
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VQ8EEQAAQBAJ&pg=PT63
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VQ8EEQAAQBAJ&pg=PT62
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=juO_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA272
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eWClDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT96
 
[quote]Of course, prostitution on a large scale continued but as a private business activity. More than 20,000 Japanese women were mobilized into the RAA by the end of 1945, according to an internal report. At its peak more than 70,000 women worked for the organization. As the demand for women to staff the organization outstripped the supply of professional prostitutes, geishas, and the like, other groups of women were drafted, including high school students (who had been put to work in munitions factories toward the end of the war) from Saitama, Hiroshima, and Kawasaki. These young women were not allowed to return home after the surrender and were forced to work in the brothels of the RAA. 88 The case of the girls from Hiroshima was particularly sad: They had been put to work in Kure and had thus survived the bombing of Hiroshima, in which their families had perished and their homes had been destroyed. They had nowhere to return to and were offered no alternative to service in the RAA. These young women were also victims of rape.[/quote]
 
 
 
 
[quote]So complete "disappearance" of the dead soldier from the official records required SIMULTANEOUS destruction of the records, held at:
1) Personnel Bureau of Army/Navy Ministry,
2) Regimental district/Naval district,
3) particular unit or even several units,
4) soldier's family (together with whole family and friends, who can inquire about soldier's fate),
5) Yasukuki shrine,
6) local Gokoku shrine,
7) often also at soldier's local shrine,
8) often also other records, like hospitals, courts, etc.
+ maybe there were trapes in other records I don't know.
 
Also, after the war soldier and his whole family have to be SIMULTANEOUSLY forgotten by:
1) Unit's veterans association,
2) local neighborhood association,
3) extended family,
4) Pension service
5) post-war surveys by various bodies (last one was in 1991).[/quote]
 
The Japanese military literally ordered mass destruction of classified documents in August 1945, including those relating to comfort women in Southeast Asia and biological warfare. Most documents on Vietnamese comfort women Indonesian comfort women were shredded (in the 1990s, over 20,000 Indonesian women admitted to being raped by Japanese, which is just a fraction of the original number, many of whom didn't live to the 1990s or didn't admit it. British, Dutch and Australian soldiers also saw Javanese Indonesian girls being used as comfort women when taking surrenders from Japanese. Vietnamese women also stayed silent, despite Vietnamese government officials admitting Japanese raped Vietnamese women)
 
Japan shredded most of its biological warfare documents which is why the document mentioning the 1942 Zhejiang bioweapons disaster which killed Japanese, can no longer be found after the war. We know it existed because of the Japanese POW who worked there admitted it in his interrogation in 1944. The document can no longer be found since Japanese burned and mass shredded Unit ei 1644's papers in August 1945.
 
This is in addition to the mass destruction of Koseki family registries in the battle of Okinawa, and in the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and firebombing of Tokyo, which burned entire families and municipal records.
 
[quote=limited post_id=2593517 time=1755154936 user_id=116835]
Japan burned tons of military documents and denied that they existed at the end of the war in August 1945 before occupation troops landed in Japan.
 
https://dev.cultural.jp/en/item/dignl-10280254
 
Court Exh. No. 3000A: Certificate of YOSHII, Michinori, Chief of Archives Section, 2nd Demobilization Bureau of the Demobilization Office, testifying to nonexistence of certain documents
 
https://dev.cultural.jp/en/item/dignl-10272724
 
Court Exh. No. 3205A: Affidavit of MIYAMA, Yozo, Section Chief of Documents, First Demobilization Bureau, testifying to loss of documents referred to in Exhibit 3025
[/quote]
 
Entire families were wiped out in the battles of Okinawa, atomic bombings and firebombing of Tokyo, leaving no survivors, no friends, no household registrations.
 
From there its simple for the Japanese military to shred all documents relating to anyone who didn't have surviving relatives or household registration.
[/quote]

 

[quote=limited post_id=2628447 time=1781912349 user_id=116835]
More on the battle of Tengchong and Mount Song.
 
This also mentions Chinese troops poured gasoline into gaps in Japanese pillboxes and ignited them with flamethrowers and it says dynamiting Mount Song worked.
 
http://14usaaf27tcs.4mg.com/SALWEEN.htm
 
[quote]The result of these innovations was a rapid reduction of the Jap stronghold. Assisted by 14TH Air Force fighters carrying bombs, the Chinese took the hill, captured a considerable quantity of material, killed or wounded an estimated 600 Japs and, in addition, repulsed a 300-400 man Jap counterattack in the early hours of the 27TH .
 
By the latter part of July, the Chinese had moved to within a half-mile of Tengchung on all sides, capturing a number of small villages and fortified positions in the process. Two days later they wee at the walls of the city.
 
This operation received considerable assistance from the 14TH Air Force, which several times bombed and strafed the Jap garrison using bombers as well as the fighters which rendered the chief support in the Kaolikung.
 
Other Chinese forces moved south toward Lungling, capturing large stores of Jap ammunition at Shangmenglin, ten miles southeast of Tengchung and then continuing south to effect a juncture with the XI Army Group.
 
Guerrilla forces, operating to great advantage during the first two months of the campaign, occupied Chang Hsi, 26 miles west of Tengchung and only 25 miles from Sadon, held by advance elements of General Stilwell’s armies in North Burma.
 
Guerrilla operations were very successful in destroying Jap communications and supply lines and in general harassing the enemy.
 
During the fourth month of operations the assault on Tengchung continued with increasing fury. The U.S. 10TH Army Air force joined the 14TTH in air assault, breaching the 35-foot-high walls by skip-bombing and strafing the Japs within the city.
 
Through the breaches pored the Chinese, to join in bitter house-to-house, hand-to-hand fighting. The hundreds of pillboxes on the walls and in the compounds within the city were eliminated one by one, in some cases by pouring gasoline through tiny embrasures and then firing it with flamethrowers.
 
After a 51 day siege, Tengchung fell on September 14. Of an estimated 2,600 Japs, including 50 officers, only a few escaped to be tracked down and subsequently eliminated, and only 50 were captured. A number of Japanese soldiers committed suicide.
 
In addition to the soldiers, 13 women were taken. Fifteen pieces of artillery, including heavy mortar and anti-tank guns, were captured, as well as over 50 machine guns, more than 800 rifles, 14 trucks and seven radios.
 
During the period from the crossing of the Salween on May 11 to September 10 just before the fall of Tengchung, the XX Army Group had lost an estimated 8,000 men killed.
 
SUNGSHAN PEAK BLOWN UP
 
In the south, the other Army had been brought from the French Indo-China front to relieve the units of the XI Army Group attacking Sungshan. On August 20, Chinese engineers under direction of Y-Force officers had tunneled under the main Jap position in two places, planted 6,000 pounds of TNT, and blown the peak and its defenders into oblivion.
 
This was the opening blow in the final assault, which ended with the exterminating of the Jap garrison on September 7. Of the estimated 23,000 Japs on Sungshan nine were captured, ten escaped. The Chinese suffered 7,675 casualties on Sungshan and the adjacent peaks, owing to the exceedingly difficult nature of the terrain and the extremely strong defenses of the enemy.
 
A considerable amount of material was captured, including a large store of blankets discovered later in a covered pit. Several women were captured here as in Tengchung.
 
The reduction of Sungshan opened the Burma Road to Lungling, allowing direct supply by road of the Chinese forces in that area. During the siege of Sungshan supplies for Lungling were trucked to Sungshan, packed around the base of the mountain and then trucked on captured Jap trucks further forward.
 
By August 10 the troops at Lungling had contacted the XX Army Group forces moving 
 
south from Tengchung and were closing in on the city from three sides, assisted by the American 14TH and 10THArmy Air Forces, who rendered excellent assistance to the CEF ground forces.
 
The battle for the hill positions around both Lungling and Manshih seesawed, with the Chinese gradually pressing forward.On August 22 the old town of Lungling, just north of the city proper, had been taken by the Chinese.Strong Jap reinforcing columns began moving against the Chinese on August 26 from the Mangshih area and despite bitter opposition forced the Chinese back for the second time. At the end of the forth month of operations, the Japs had regained many of the mountain positions at terrific cost to themselves, and controlled a small sector of the Lungling terminus of the Lungling-Tengchung road.
 
There were literally scores of attacks and counterattacks and the entire Lungling Mangshi area was in a state of flux with the Japs suffering heavy losses because they were forced to attack the hill positions, strongly fortified which they had previously lost to the Chinese.
 
Fighting for the first few days of the fifth month, from September 11 to September 15 was exceedingly heavy around Hanchang, a village on the Tengchung road about three miles north of Lungling. Chinese resistance stiffened, and patrols entering Hanchang on September 15 found that the Japs, having suffered excessive casualties, had withdrawn, leaving over 400 bodies in that village alone.
 
Chinese reinforcements, flown to Paochan and then trucked or marched from there to Lunglind, arrived in the area and by the end of September the Chinese had regained all of the ground lost previously and held a general line just west of Hsiangta, eight miles east of Mangshih, and again were poised on three sides of Lunglind.
 
Pingka, surrounded since July, was taken during this period. On September 22 a column of 500 Japs was reported near the town and at 2 A.M. te next day, the garrison began to evacuate. The Chinese forces immediately moved into the town, and dispatched units to pursue the withdrawing enemy columns.
 
On September 25 the main Jap body reached Mangshih, after suffering some casualties.
 
From this date until October 24, there was little ground activity in the Lunglind-Mangshih sector although the 14TH Army Air Force struck continually and persistently at the Burma Road beyond Mangshih, and at the Jap supply lines and storehouses from Mangshih to Wanting, causing an estimated 1,0000 Jap casualties in one ten-day period.
 
Except for minor skirmishes and patrol activity, the Chinese during this period regrouped their units, collected supplies and organized for the final assault on Lungling.
 
The attack on Lungling was launched October 29.Expertly supported by the 14TH Air Force, the Chinese forces took a hill two and a half miles southwest of Lungling as well as three hilltops three miles southwest of the city. In the Mangshih area, all except one Jap position on Hungyuenshan, three miles northeast of the city, had been taken by night fall. This position was taken the following day.
 
American planes throughout the attack continued to fly bombing and strafing sorties against the Japs and on the night of November 2-3 the remaining Japs in Lungling withdrew. Chinese forces marched into Lungling early in the morning of November 3, 1944. They found a shattered city, with scarcely a building standing intact.
 
Bombers of the 14TH Air Force continued their attacks on Manghih, Chefang and on Jap storage areas in Wanting, and there were minor sorties, attacks and counterattacks in the vicinity of Mangshih. Mangshih was taken on November 20 and Chefang on December 1, 1944. At year’s end the fighting was in progress on the very border of Burma, with Japs cleared from Yunnan province north of the border line.Wanting fell after midnight January 20, 1945. This was the virtual close of that phase of the combined Chinese-Burma operations known as the Salween Campaign.[/quote]
 
http://www.nytimes.com/1944/07/10/archives/foes-losses-high-on-salween-front-40-to-45-of-the-japanese-killed.html
 
[quote]FOE'S LOSSES HIGH ON SALWEEN FRONT; 40 to 45% of the Japanese Killed or Wounded in the Burma Road Battle
 
Share full article
 
By Brooks Atkinsonby Wireless To the New York Times.
 
July 10, 1944
FOE'S LOSSES HIGH ON SALWEEN FRONT; 40 to 45% of the Japanese Killed or Wounded in the Burma Road Battle
Credit...The New York Times Archives
See the article in its original context from
July 10, 1944, Page 7Buy Reprints
New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.
Subscribe
*Does not include Games-only or Cooking-only subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.
HEADQUARTERS, CHINESE EXPEDITIONARY-FORCE, July 8 (Delayed)—Between 40 and 45 per cent of all Japanese troops on the Salween front have been killed or wounded since the Chinese offensive began May 11, according to informed sources here. The campaign to open territory for land communication to China goes slowly, but it steadily pares away enemy strength. Despite delays and reverses, it remains one of the most creditable Chinese military operations since the Sino-Japanese war began seven years ago. Although there have been no spectacular developments in the fighting of the last two days, the Chinese are still making slow gains at Tengyueh, Lungling and Sungshan. The last communication line from Tengyueh is now cut. Chinese guerrillas and regular troops have blocked the road to Bhamo, depriving the enemy of the last chance to escape or to evacuate wounded, who are reported to be numerous in Tengyueh.
 
Chinese Certain of Victory
 
Fighting in the southeast area has brought the Chinese closer to the wall of the beleaguered city. After seven weeks of successful fighting, the Twentieth Group Army, infected with a spirit of victory, perhaps prematurely, regards Tengyueh as easy picking after the bloody, agonized battle at Tatangtzu, Mamien Pass and Hungmoshu. In the Sungshan area, where several sturdily built Japanese fortifications have blocked the Burma road west of the Salween River since June 4, the Chinese last Friday stormed and captured the Tayakou positions and all but one pillbox on Kunglungpo, using American flame throwers, bazookas and demolition charges. One small corner of the main Sungshan fort is reported to be still in Japanese hands. Since these fortifications are stormed at night, the Chinese are unable to count the number of enemy dead, although the Japanese remaining alive are thought to be few. Twice during Friday's fighting the Japanese emerged from their defenses. The Chinese fought them with bayonets, cruel weapons that suit the Chinese better than the Japanese.
 
Americans Trained Chinese
 
Gen. Hsiao I-hsu, Chief of Staff of the Chinese Expeditionary Force, gives credit to Brig. Gen. Frank Dorn and his United States Y Force for helping train Chinese troops for the current assaults. By means of this standard American plan, the assaults have been succeeding with light losses, in contrast to other methods that failed for four weeks with heavy losses. Around Lungling, where the Eleventh Group Army has been marking time for a month, the situation seems to be improving also. The Japanese, who had been conducting offensive defense operations there, now are withdrawing to defensive positions. The Twentieth and Eleventh Group Armies were supplied from the air Friday by a troop-carrier squadron of the United States Fourteenth Air Force.[/quote]
 
[quote]https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=189
https://history-maps.com/warmap/world-war-ii/event/battle-of-mount-song
https://www.wondersofyunnan.com/mddcs.html?mddid=25378
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Command/USA-CBI-Command-9.html
https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-salween-offensive-blundering-to-success-in-burma/
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1125592.pdf
https://www.forgottensquadron.com/?p=225
https://www.bastillepost.com/global/article/5121545-brave-chinese-americans-fighting-in-battle-of-western-yunnan-remembered-after-80-years
https://english.news.cn/20250930/9d00a4d1adf94c218472efec4a318830/c.html
https://www.chinausfocus.com/society-culture/moments-of-unity-how-tengchong-remembers-a-time-when-the-us-and-china-stood-side-by-side
http://www.14usaaf27tcs.4mg.com/SALWEEN.htm
https://www.cbi-theater.com/roundup/roundup011145.html
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Time/USA-CBI-Time-4.html
https://usdandelion.com/archives/10873
https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/USA-CBI-Command/USA-CBI-Command-8.html
https://media.defense.gov/2010/Nov/05/2001329890/-1/-1/0/AFD-101105-012.pdf
Video thumb

Video thumb

https://www.history.co.uk/articles/why-was-burma-the-forgotten-war
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2015-08/19/content_21642466.htm
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/2015-08/19/content_21643813.htm
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world//2015victoryanniv/2015-08/19/content_21644860.htm
http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/epaper/2015-08/19/content_21648484.htm
 
https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/yankee-guerrillas-in-burma/
http://www.easaul.com/oss-detachment-101.html
https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/tag/myitkyina/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01495933.2025.2509096
https://www.cia.gov/legacy/museum/artifact/irrawaddy-ambush/
https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/tag/cbi/
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/FM_31-21_Guerrilla_Warfare_and_Special_Forces_Operations_%281961%29.pdf
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA523185.pdf
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xPc0WKBbIs&start=136
 [/quote]
 
 
Japan launched cholera bomb and bubonic plague attacks against Baoshan in Yunnan in May 1942, at the same time it did the cholera attack in Jinhua Zhejiang in 1942 that killed Japanese soldiers.
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2595527#p2595527
 
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=2627134#p2627134
 
https://www.dontow.com/2009/08/heroic-and-critical-battles-in-yunnan-during-wwii/
 
Japan launched biological attacks against areas they intended to invade, they marched into the cholera bombed area in Zhejiang which is why they died, they used biological weapons at Changde while trying to seize the city. It wasn't random targeting, it was to weaken areas for occupation.
 
And they tried to cross the Salween into Baoshan, its clear this wasn't a rogue mission by the Japanese general Sakaguchi of the 56th division west of the Salween to cross by himself, he had to have authorisation and orders from high command for planes to drop bioweapons for him into Baoshan to soften it up for his troops who tried to cross the Salween but were repelled by Chinese troops on the east bank, who held firm and did not flee before the bioweapons contrary to propaganda.
 
Japan later retroactively doctored its orders and claimed they never authorised him to cross the Salween.
 
Most deaths were due to cholera, as Japan's bubonic plague weapons were ineffective for mass killing.
 
Senshi Sosho claims that Chinese troops fled deep into Yunnan far beyond the east bank of the Salween in May 1942, and falsely attributes this statement to the US war history, when AVG pilots say Chinese troops actively raided Japanese truck and tank columns on the west bank of the Salween and forced the Japanese into retreating all the way to Wanding. They stood their ground and didn't flee before the cholera and bubonic plague bombs, China never abandoned Baoshan or the Salween's east bank.
 
It is clear now that Japan retroactively doctored orders and commands to try to erase entire battles from the record, Sakaguchi clearly wasn't acting on his own when he tried to cross the Salween if he could get Ishii to drop bioweapons for him.
[/quote]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word

mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1