Advertisement
Advertisement
Chicago Tribune

Illinois teen who faced a felony for allegedly joking about a senior prank files federal lawsuit: ‘Something I’ll never forget’

Rebecca Johnson, Chicago Tribune
7 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Illinois teen who faced a felony for allegedly joking about a senior prank files federal lawsuit: ‘Something I’ll never forget’
Illinois teen who faced a felony for allegedly joking about a senior prank files federal lawsuit: ‘Something I’ll never forget’

It was the day after the senior pranks when a Kendall County, Illinois, teenager and his friends were laughing about the annual tradition in their English class.

That year, all in good fun, Jackson Leggett said some of the seniors at Newark Community High School had toilet-papered the principal's house and parked speed boats at the school.

They also chatted about a rumor going around about potential vandalism at the school, which Leggett said he tried to quash with the sarcastic quip, "What do you think I'm gonna do? Burn the school down?"

Advertisement
Advertisement

This October 2024 conversation — which Leggett intended as a joke — completely upended his senior year, according to a lawsuit Leggett filed last month in federal court against the school district, the superintendent, his teacher, Kendall County and a sheriff's deputy.

The suit alleges that the then 17-year-old was wrongfully arrested, falsely charged with felony disorderly conduct and forced to miss out on many senior year milestones over what should have been treated as a "minor school disciplinary issue" at most.

The now 19-year-old also told the Tribune he was left "constantly nervous and scared" for months, and that his reputation was damaged in the small town, located about an hour and a half drive from Chicago. He said he'd never been in trouble with the law before.

"Even in schools, students have First Amendment rights," said Julia Rickert, Leggett's attorney and a partner at Loevy & Loevy. "They're limited in that the school can punish speech sometimes, in a way that in public they couldn't, but that they can't make it into a crime."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tim Ulrich, the superintendent and principal at Newark Community High School District 18, said in a statement that the claims raised against the district and its employees are "meritless" and that the district "intends to vigorously defend itself and its employees against these claims."

Dan Briars, a spokesperson for the Kendall County sheriff's office, also said the department can't comment on specific details of pending litigation but that they conduct "thorough, comprehensive investigations, and any resulting charges or arrests are based on and supported by probable cause."

Senior pranks

Senior pranks had long been a rite of passage at Newark, Leggett said. He heard about them happening during homecoming week when he was a freshman, and from his brother who's two years older than him.

The pranks the students chose in 2024 — toilet-papering the principal's house and school and parking the boats — didn't seem "out of the ordinary" to Leggett.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In fact, the lawsuit alleges that Ulrich was present for the pranks and told students they could continue so long as they "did no permanent damage."

"I'm not going to say (Ulrich) was happy about it obviously because nobody wants that to happen to the school," Leggett said. "But it happens every year, and he gave us permission. He could have said no."

Another popular rite of passage in the Chicago area called "senior assassin" has grabbed headlines in recent months. A high school student in northwest Indiana is also facing a felony charge after participating in the game, which police warned can be dangerous.

But Leggett didn't get in trouble for the pranks themselves, the lawsuit said, rather the jokes he made just hours after in class.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The teacher reported the morning's conversation to administrators, according to the suit. On a discipline referral form, she wrote that Leggett had made "bizarre and unbelievable comments" such as burning down the school.

She also referenced alleged comments that Leggett denies making, such as burning Ulrich's house and stealing his wife. She acknowledged in this form, however, that Leggett had been "making jokes."

An assistant principal suspended Leggett for three days, and although he believed the punishment was unfair, he thought the ordeal was over. But the suit alleged that the principal "was determined to see it become a criminal matter," and that he contacted the school resource officer, a Kendall County sheriff's deputy.

During an interview with the deputy, the teacher said she told Leggett and another student to stop talking about the pranks and that "I wouldn't be laughing and goofing off about it because (administrators) are gonna talk to you," body camera footage shows.

Advertisement
Advertisement

She overheard the duo saying they maybe needed to "take it to the next level" because they didn't understand what they could possibly be punished for, according to the footage.

"I feel like we sometimes are very lenient with them where other schools would not be so lenient with them," she told the deputy, later adding, "Whether they were joking or not you never know sometimes."

At the end of the interview, the deputy said although Ulrich was considering legal action, "I don't think I may have a lot to go on just based off what you said … If it came off in a joking manner."

The deputy wrote in a report that Ulrich, who wasn't in the classroom at the time, "did not perceive the comments as a joke" and that he felt threatened by them.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Leggett said he's completely baffled about why the principal allegedly pushed to escalate the case.

"I have no idea," he said. "That's what I want to figure out with this lawsuit."

'Huge piece taken out of my life'

Leggett didn't think anything of the two police vehicles that pulled up near him while he was mowing a client's lawn, at least at first. At the time, he ran a landscaping business with a friend.

He was shocked when officers walked up and arrested him. Leggett remembers asking if he could load up his mower and drive down the road so he wouldn't be arrested at a client's house, a request they denied.

"I was just very scared and worried and pretty mad," he said. "I've never been arrested before. I have no idea what any of that looks like."

Advertisement
Advertisement

He was charged with felony disorderly conduct and detained for eight days at a juvenile facility in Kane County. The charge was eventually dropped about seven months later in May 2025, according to the lawsuit. But Leggett said he can't so easily forget his time at the detention facility.

"It was the absolute worst thing I'll ever experience. It's tough to talk about," he said. "I had no idea when I was gonna get out of there. There's hardly any windows. I couldn't have any sunlight. I was going crazy in there.

"It's something I'll never forget, and I want to forget it," he added.

While living with the threat of prosecution over his head, the suit alleged, Leggett's education also suffered. He had to take classes online only for the rest of the year. He couldn't attend senior prom or walk at his high school graduation. He even was excluded from the yearbook, the suit noted.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Leggett also couldn't play basketball, a sport he said he'd enjoyed ever since he could dribble.

"It made me pretty sad because watching all my friends be able to do everything when I'm sitting at home," he said.

One of the toughest parts of the situation, Leggett said, was the judgment he faced from others. While his friends "knew the truth," he said it felt like others would talk behind his back, even when he went to the gas station. The landscaping business also took a massive hit, he said.

Leggett said his favorite pastime is hunting, something he's no longer able to do. Because the sheriff's deputy flagged him as a "clear and present danger" to state authorities, the suit alleged he's been unable to obtain a firearm owner's identification card, a violation of his Second Amendment rights.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"It's a huge piece taken out of my life," he said. "I just love being out in nature. It's almost therapeutic, you know, like sitting up in a tree, waiting on a deer out in the woods, it's beautiful."

Leggett, who now works as a machine operator, said he hopes by sharing his story publicly that his friends and neighbors can get a better understanding of what happened to him. He said he also wants answers from the school and police.

"I think people are starting to change their ideas about me," he said. "I hope this doesn't happen to anybody else and that other schools see this and take things more seriously instead of just arresting people."

____

Up next
Backfire News

This Florida Go-Kart Project Somehow Ended With A Teenager Taking A Cleaver To The Head

Shawn Henry
4 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
This Florida Go-Kart Project Somehow Ended With A Teenager Taking A Cleaver To The Head
This Florida Go-Kart Project Somehow Ended With A Teenager Taking A Cleaver To The Head
  • Two teenagers working on a go-kart in Florida were threatened by a 60-year-old neighbor with a kitchen knife and meat cleaver over noise complaints.

Two teenagers were doing what countless gearheads have done in garages across the country, wrenching on a go-kart and revving the engine to hear it come alive. What should have been an ordinary afternoon of tinkering turned into something far darker, and it ended with a 60-year-old man facing serious criminal charges.

Related articles:

According to information from the Lake County Sheriff's Office, the trouble started over noise. The two teens were working on the go-kart inside a garage, and getting the engine to fire up meant revving it. That sound apparently did not sit well with a neighbor, and that is where everything went sideways.

A confrontation that escalated fast

The teens said their 60-year-old neighbor, Richard Carter, started cussing them out while they worked. They told authorities that Carter threw a lawn chair across a driveway and ordered them to get out of his neighborhood. That alone would have been an ugly exchange between a frustrated neighbor and a couple of kids.

Advertisement
Advertisement

But it did not stop there. Carter reportedly went and grabbed a kitchen knife and a meat cleaver, then came back and threatened the juveniles by holding the blades near their heads. He allegedly warned that he would bash one of the teen's heads in if the engine got started again. This is where a noise complaint stopped being a noise complaint and became something a lot more frightening.

The teens were left begging

The detail that sticks with you is how the kids reacted. One of the teenagers dropped to his knees and begged Carter not to hurt them, according to authorities. The other backed away from the situation entirely.

That is not how two teenagers should ever have to respond to a neighbor annoyed by some engine noise. These were kids working on a project, not criminals, and they ended up pleading for their safety over a hobby that millions of people share. The fact that a go-kart build could spiral into a moment that terrifying says a lot about how badly the encounter got out of hand.

The story he told deputies did not hold up

When deputies arrived to confront Carter, he initially claimed he didn't do anything. That denial fell apart quickly. Authorities said he went on to confirm that he had in fact grabbed the knives and confronted the teenagers with them.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That contradiction is the part that matters. It is one thing to deny an accusation outright, but admitting to the core of what happened while still insisting he did nothing wrong paints a clear picture for investigators. Carter was charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Why enthusiasts should pay attention

For anyone who has ever spent a weekend building, tuning, or testing something with an engine, this story hits close to home. Garage projects make noise. Revving an engine is part of the process, whether you are dialing in a go-kart, a motorcycle, or a project car. It comes with the territory, and most neighbors understand that even if they don't love it.

What makes this case stand out is how a complaint that thousands of hobbyists deal with quietly turned into an alleged armed threat against minors. Disputes over noise are common, and they usually end with a conversation, a phone call, or at worst a knock on the door. Pulling weapons on teenagers and holding them near their heads crosses into a completely different category, and the law treats it that way.

The bigger picture for hobbyists

Working on vehicles in a residential setting always carries some friction with neighbors, and that tension is nothing new. Most of the time it stays civil. People grumble, hobbyists try to keep the noise reasonable, and life moves on.

Related articles:

Advertisement
Advertisement

This incident is a reminder of how quickly that friction can boil over into something dangerous when one person decides to escalate. The teens were not accused of breaking any law. They were building something, and that ordinary act of tinkering left them on the receiving end of an alleged knife threat in their own neighborhood.

The takeaway

Two teenagers will likely remember this day for the rest of their lives, and not because of anything they did wrong. They were working on a go-kart and they ended up begging a grown man not to hurt them.

Carter now faces two felony counts, and the courts will sort out what happens next. But the real question for the rest of us is simpler and more uncomfortable. How does annoyance over a little engine noise turn into a man allegedly holding a cleaver to a kid's head, and what does it take to keep a hobby that should be harmless from turning into a nightmare?

Source

Up next
BBC

Grieving family warn of open water swimming risks

Emma Baugh; Shariqua Ahmed - Peterborough
4 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Darren, a man with short light brown hair, wearing a black T-shirt. He is sitting next to Jemma, a woman with long blonde hair, wearing a black T-shirt. Neither are smiling.
Darren Lloyd and Jemma Kirk said it was "upsetting" to watch the film that shares Jack's story [Emma Baugh/BBC]

"Don't put your parents through this," a mum and dad said as they warned teenagers to take seriously the dangers of open water swimming after their 16-year-old son drowned.

Jack Lloyd, from Peterborough, died in April last year after he jumped into a cold lake near Crown Lakes Country Park in Farcet.

His family, alongside Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue Service, have come together to share Jack's story in a short film to highlight the risks of swimming in open water.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jack's father, Darren Lloyd, said: "It's tough and not easy to do something like this – especially when you lose a child. But we did it because we want to help others and save lives."

"Hopefully, teenagers and young people can understand the risks of taking chances like this," he added.

An inquest in September, led by coroner Simon Milburn, heard Jack, a student at Peterborough College, had gone to the lake with a couple of friends.

Video evidence showed he "jumped in voluntarily", but struggled after entering the water and went into shock.

He then "subsequently submerged and did not resurface", the hearing was told.

Rows of people watching the screen inside a cinema theatre.
Dozens of people attended the film's screening on Thursday at Odeon Cinema in Peterborough [Emma Baugh/BBC]

Jack's father and stepmother, Jemma Kirk, described the 16-year-old as a "loving, caring boy" and said sharing his story has been "important".

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Watching the film was upsetting. It brought back all the memories of what we have been through," Kirk said.

Lloyd added: "We are at a loss for words, but hopefully, it will send a strong message about dangers of open water.

"If you are a young person watching this - we miss Jack every day, his brothers and sisters miss him. You wouldn't want to put your mum and dad through this."

When recalling the moment they learned about Jack's death, Lloyd said: "It's ripped us a apart… We couldn't believe it.

"When we got to Crown Lakes and saw the emergency services, the reality hit.

"If Jack's name can save one life, that would mean a lot."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The film premiered as part of Drowning Prevention Week, which was organised by the Royal Life Saving Society UK, at the Odeon Cinema in Queensgate shopping centre, Peterborough, and will be shown in schools across the city.

Through Jack's story, the film highlights the dangers of open water swimming, explains cold water shock and what to do if you get into difficulty in water.

Risk of rivers

A metal fence with a Crown Lakes sign board on it and blue and white police tape around it.
Swimming and public access to the Crown Lakes was restricted after the incident in April 2025 [Emma Baugh/BBC]

The fire service said 165 children lost their lives from drowning across the UK between April 2019 and March 2024, with teenagers aged between 13 and 17 having the highest drowning rate.

In Cambridgeshire there were nine deaths caused by drowning between April 2025 and March 2026, compared with seven the previous year.

Advertisement
Advertisement

James Ball, from Cambridgeshire and Fire and Service, said: "In the last five years that we have seen a doubling of the numbers of fatalities across the country.

"We continue to warn people not to enter open water, but we're also looking for new ways to engage young people.

"We hope this reaches far and wide - if it saves even one life, it will have been worthwhile."

The side of a white marquee with a blue sign that reads: "The Jack Lloyd Swimming Pool".
Hampton Vale Primary School has been offering swimming lessons in Jack's memory from a pop-up pool [Hampton Vale Primary School]

Hampton Vale Primary Academy, Peterborough, which Jack previously attended, has installed a pop-up swimming pool in his memory to provide lessons for pupils.

PE lead Scott Collins said the school was "devastated" by Jack's death.

"I think the film really gets straight to the point - it shows what to do if you fall in and highlights the dangers," he said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"At our school, pupils from Year 3 to Year 6 are swimming every day. We're also teaching them about the risks of rivers, ponds and open water - not just in swimming lessons."

Jack's family continue to campaign to raise awareness about the dangers of cold water swimming and are fundraising to open a youth club in his son's name.

"It's important to share Jack's story - if it can help save lives," his father said.

Do you have a story suggestion for Peterborough? Contact us below.

Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

More on this story

Up next
Yahoo Movies

'Ferris Bueller's Day Off' captures a teen freedom Gen Z says is gone

'I wish I could drop an entire day to spend it just with friends — just abandon all responsibility," high school senior Maggie, 18, tells Yahoo.

Suzy Byrne, Reporter
7 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
TVs showing scenes from Ferris Bueller
Ferris Bueller got an entire day off from school. The teens who rewatched the movie in 2026 say that's the part that feels unrealistic.
(Photo illustration: Jenny Chang-Rodriguez/Yahoo News; photos: CBS via Getty Images)

Ferris Bueller's Day Off was the ultimate skip-school fantasy when it hit theaters in June 1986.

For one glorious day, king of cool Ferris Bueller (Matthew Broderick) played hooky with his stylish girlfriend Sloane Peterson (Mia Sara) and best friend Cameron Frye (Alan Ruck). They scored a fancy lunch reservation under the name Abe Froman, caught a Cubs game, visited the Art Institute of Chicago and took over a downtown parade (Danke schoen!) — all while Principal Ed Rooney (Jeffrey Jones) desperately tried to catch Ferris.

The John Hughes comedy delivered one unforgettable moment after another, right up until the Ferrari they took without asking rocketed through the glass wall of Cameron's father's garage.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Forty years later, I asked a group of high school students — including three newly graduated seniors and one rising junior named Sloane after Ferris's girlfriend (!) — to watch, or rewatch, what 18-year-old Freya calls "a great '80s classic." 

Their reactions revealed some surprising generational shifts. They admired Ferris's free spirit and freedom, related to Cameron through the language of anxiety and questioned the adults' behavior. They also agreed that nobody could get away with a stunt like that in the age of smartphones and Snapchat.

Ferris still appeals to teens — but the reasons have changed

Ferris no doubt has a selfish side, but these kids found him to be a mostly "righteous dude." 

Not because he outsmarts the principal and his parents, but because he gets something many modern teenagers feel they don't have enough of: time.

Matthew Broderick as Ferris Bueller lounges shirtless in a patio chair while talking on a cordless phone in a scene from Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
Matthew Broderick as Ferris Bueller relaxes at home while pretending to be sick.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

"Stealing a Ferrari may be excessive, but I know, as a senior, I can't wait to be done with school," says Maggie, 18, who was watching the film for the first time. "Senioritis is absolutely real. All of us just want to enjoy being teenagers, spend time with each other."

Advertisement
Advertisement

As a dancer who will continue competing in college, Maggie connected with how "unscheduled" Ferris and his friends' lives felt compared to those of many students today, who are juggling heavy school loads, extracurriculars and jobs.

"I wish I could drop an entire day to spend it just with friends — just abandon all responsibility," she says.

Freya, who was first introduced to the movie by her Gen X parents a few years ago, called Ferris "cool, carefree and smart," all of which are qualities she aspires to possess.

Mia Sara, Alan Ruck and Matthew Broderick ride in a red convertible in a scene from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, with Ferris raising his arms as they drive through Chicago.
Mia Sara, Alan Ruck and Broderick ride through Chicago in Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

In her experience, teenagers have "no free time" because high school is "extremely demanding."

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Kids need more sick days and mental health days," she says.

Today's teens see themselves in Cameron

If Ferris is the aspiration, Cameron is the reality.

"He felt the most real," Maggie says. "He's anxious, overthinks everything and spends most of the movie worried about consequences. I think a lot more teenagers today are probably Camerons than Ferrises."

Sloane, 16, saw Cameron in herself too.

"Whenever we're doing something a little more [adventurous] with our plans, I feel like I'm always the one having to worry about something — like my resources being used, such as my car," she says.

Mia Sara, Alan Ruck and Matthew Broderick ride in a red convertible in a scene from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, with Ferris reacting excitedly as they drive.
Teens who revisited the film 40 years later said a carefree day like Ferris's feels hard to imagine.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

She connects to his growth through the film.

"I like how at the end he has his whole resolution of like: 'I don't need to make excuses anymore. I just need to face the music and see what consequences I get from there,'" says Sloane, who has seen the movie three times.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What stands out isn't that they identify with Cameron; he's always been the emotional heart of the film. It's the language they use to describe him — anxious, overthinking — which wasn't nearly as common in conversations about teenagers when the movie debuted in 1986.

Skipping school isn't the rebellion it once was

Senior cut days have become part of high school culture since we first heard "Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?" 

"It's very normal for people to skip school, so it would not have been such a big deal," says Ivy, a 17-year-old senior, who watched the film for the first time.

What's different is how teens spend their stolen time.

"I usually just stay home or I go to Starbucks and then go home," Ivy says.

Alan Ruck, Mia Sara and Matthew Broderick at a restaurant host stand in a scene from Ferris Bueller's Day Off
The teens posed as wealthy diners at a fancy Chicago restaurant.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

When members of her graduating class skipped school this year, they went out to eat. Ferris and friends took on an entire city.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sloane says if she skipped school, she'd go get food or hit the mall.

Freya suspects Ferris's adventure would be less ambitious today.

"Ferris would just stay home and play video games or watch TV," she laughs.

But even senior skip days come with responsibilities for today's teens. Freya says on hers, she still had to go to 4th period — or else she'd miss a test.

Ferris's day off would last about 10 minutes

The biggest difference observed between today's teens and the '80s teen characters? Tech.

While Ferris was good at hacking into the school computer system to change his attendance record with his desktop PC, much of the movie now feels like a relic of a pre-digital age.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Between Life360, Find My, text messages, Ring cameras and social media, someone would know exactly where he was within 10 minutes," laughs Maggie. 

Look at that dinosaur of a computer. There were no iPhones in Ferris's time.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

Before they'd be able to paint "Save Ferris" on a water tower, his hijinks would be all over social media.

"There would be Snapchat stories of him in the parade and driving around in the car," says Ivy. 

Maggie adds that the "movie feels almost peaceful because nobody is constantly checking a phone." 

The principal — and parents — are relics

Kids today skip school for a mental reset, a trip to Starbucks or the mall. Ferris thought bigger.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

More than Ferris, Cameron or even the Ferrari, Rooney baffled the students.

"If you miss a day, your school will just mark you absent and not care that much," shrugs Freya.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Maggie agreed, saying school administrators today are likely focused on "more important things."

Sloane was even less charitable.

"What a freaking weirdo," she says of Rooney. "Like, why are you breaking into this house? Even after getting stuck in the mud and attacked by a dog, you're still trying just to prove a fake absence?"

"What a freaking weirdo," a 16-year-old viewer says, baffled by Principal Rooney's determination to catch Ferris skipping school.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

They also couldn't relate to Ferris's parents.

"They seem very naive to Ferris's behavior," says Ivy. "My parents are a little bit more suspicious of me and wouldn't let me off as easy."

Sloane calls the relationship "absolutely bogus."

"My parents would never trust me that many times," says Sloane. 

Today's teens were skeptical that Ferris could fool his parents so easily.
(CBS Photo Archive via Getty Images)

She also faults Ferris's parents for "creating a gap in their relationship with their daughter," Jeanie (Jennifer Grey), "with zero acknowledgment of it."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Maggie says she'd have "20 text messages asking where she was" if she disappeared for even an hour.

"I know my parents," she says. "They would be worried sick."

Advertisement