Advertisement
Politico

Aaron Schock's pursuit of a second chance — and a gold mine

Adam Wren and Eric Bazail-Eimil
22 min read
Add Yahoo on Google

Aaron Schock could not stop talking about the gold. He returned from a trip to Caracas in early 2025 telling a confidant that Venezuela's vice president had promised him a gold mine — an honest-to-god gold mine — if he could get U.S. sanctions lifted on the country.

No one around Schock could know whether the agreement was real. Like many things in Schock's life, it could have been a gilded mirage distracting from a more complicated truth. But for much of the year, those who interacted with him saw a man animated by the promise of gold, part of a supposedly eight-figure payday that Schock told business associate Benjamin Papermaster awaited him if he managed to keep Venezuela's relations with the United States from further souring. Schock grew seemingly transfixed with the arcane mechanics of turning a precious metal into wealth: finding a refinery, then a specialist who could extricate the crucial element from dilute ore.

"Gold guy is available in 5-10 minutes," Schock texted Papermaster one day last February, according to a message viewed by POLITICO.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The former Illinois Republican lawmaker had had a rough decade since resigning from Congress in 2015 amid an ethics investigation into alleged spending abuses. A decision to come out as gay in March of 2020 estranged him from family back in the Midwest. Since then, Schock had fled to Beverly Hills and reinvented himself as a hotel developer just as the hospitality industry struggled from the coronavirus pandemic. But you wouldn't have known that from the celebratory Instagram posts of ribbon cuttings in Los Angeles and New York City from the disgraced congressman who still cut the handsome figure of the boy next door.

Donald Trump's reelection in November 2024 was a godsend for Schock. A wealthy and powerful Trump donor was ready to pay him $100,000 to return to Washington's corridors at a moment when his earlier transgressions there might not any longer be legible as scandal. Schock was driven to develop a strategy that would keep Trump's relationship with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro intact so American oil business could resume operations undisturbed.

Schock traveled Venezuela, growing consumed with a future windfall embedded in a larger quest to rehab his reputation, according to a year's worth of Schock's personal calendar entries, private group chats and five months of bank transactions, alongside interviews with Schock's associates in the chats, including Papermaster, the top aide managing the project for him. Papermaster, who previously knew Schock socially but was unfamiliar with politics, ultimately turned on Schock due to what he described as a failure to uphold his end of the business relationship.

Schock did not respond to multiple text messages, emails, phone calls and a letter sent via certified mail to his Beverly Hills home. An intermediary, Republican operative Caroline Wren, said Schock told her that he would not "engage in a coordinated hit piece." Delcy Rodríguez, who was vice president of Venezuela at the time of Schock's visit to Caracas and now serves as president, declined to comment through a government spokesperson.

Advertisement
Advertisement

MAGA's cast of throwback characters has undercut the maxim that there are no second acts in American life. Schock's return to the political scene came freighted with international intrigue, a jet-setting influence broker directing a transatlantic operation to keep the United States out of war. The attempt to reinvent himself as a kind of global fixer after navigating years of federal prosecution led Schock into a cul de sac of MAGA influencers and oil interests looking to give shape to a president's fluid ideas about foreign policy.

"He's going to fight to the death to get this oil deal, this gold deal," said Papermaster, who served as an aide-de-camp during Schock's year-long quest to redefine Venezuela policy. "And he's gonna let everything else around him collapse."

He who wrestles with you

Schock rose through politics with striking ease. He won election to his local school board at 19, four years later its president and then a seat in the state legislature while serving as a Peoria-based executive for a national real estate developer.

From his perch as the first millennial to enter Congress, in 2009, and representing a rural and small-town-dotted swath of central and western Illinois, he had a prized seat on the powerful Ways and Means Committee, served on the House whip team and had even kicked the tires on a gubernatorial bid — "one of the rising stars of the Republican Party" — The Washington Post called him. His six-pack abs landed him on a glossy Men's Health cover, and his globe-trotting travel to exotic destinations became an object of fascination on Capitol Hill and beyond.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"I think the people that he represented thought he was a very good congressman," said former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, whom Schock succeeded in the district. "He won his elections overwhelmingly."

In 2015, Schock's personal life began to overshadow his work as a lawmaker. The Post Style section detailed his ostentatiously appointed congressional office in the Rayburn Office Building, one apparently modeled after the red room in the British PBS period drama "Downton Abbey". "I'm different. I came to Congress at 27," Schock told ABC News at the time. "When I go take a personal vacation I don't sit on the beach, I go do active things. And so, I'm also not going to live in a cave. So when I post an Instagram Photo with me and my friends, as Taylor Swift said, 'Haters gonna hate.'"

Accusations of sloppy — or, in some cases, entirely absent — congressional and campaign accounting piled up. There was an $800 duty-free expenditure on "event supplies" at a Galeão International Airport shop during a 2014 trip to Rio de Janeiro, which his campaign described at the time as "gift shop items for fundraising and donors." There was $1,600 that his congressional office paid to campaign consultants, and a dinner in New Delhi classified as a fundraising expense. The Associated Press linked him to dozens of flights on donors' planes, unreported in-kind gifts totaling $40,000. Amid the scrutiny, Schock agreed to conduct a review of his office's spending practices and eventually paid back some money he acknowledged having been unfairly reimbursed.

"While this may all be unethical, I gotta admit, it looks really fun to be this guy," Jon Stewart joked over a montage of Schock's Instagram feed set to Swift's "Shake It Off."

Advertisement
Advertisement

In April 2015, as an Illinois-based federal grand jury prepared to hear evidence about the alleged impropriety, Schock resigned from Congress. The next year he was charged with "defrauding the federal government" and "covering it up with false and fraudulent statements, claims and invoices." In their indictment, prosecutors alleged that Schock had billed more than $100,000 in personal expenses to taxpayers and campaign committees, crimes which could draw an 80-year sentence. Schock maintained his innocence, and challenged the indictment on procedural and constitutional grounds.

As the case dragged on for four years, Schock relocated to California and grew a beard as he fixated on fixing up his Beverly Hills apartment. From there he returned to his pre-congressional line of work, joining partners in 2016 to invest in what Schock called a "dilapidated office building" across from Los Angeles International Airport, with plans to turn it into a Hyatt Place. Later that year, he opened Fouquet's New York hotel in Tribeca in partnership with Caspi Development and Los Angeles real estate magnate Jim Parks.

As Schock assembled a coastal real estate portfolio, whatever links remained to his time as a rising heartland politician were dissolved. Federal prosecutors agreed in March 2019 to drop 24 felony charges in an agreement that paved the way for Schock to admit wrongdoing, reimburse funds and pay back the Internal Revenue Service.

"Four years ago, I left office among a lot of media flurry that I said then was overblown and unjustified," he said at the federal courthouse in Chicago after the deferred prosecution agreement was announced. "But I said then what I said today in court, which was my office and I could have done a better job in administrative functions at the back end of our office. I attempted then as I have attempted now to make restitution for those mistakes. But there's a difference between mistakes and crimes." He said he "felt wronged" by a prosecutor who he said "saw me as his ticket to stardom."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Schock said he was "looking forward to pursuing opportunities in the private sector. I'll always have a heart to serve, that doesn't mean I have to run for office. There are other ways to serve your community."

He acknowledged learning "lots in the process."

"I'm reminded of Edmund Burke, the famous British parliamentarian, who said 'he who wrestles with you strengthens you,'" Schock told reporters, "and so I'm focused on the future not the past."

Out and about

His past was not done with him yet. The following year, in a letter posted to his tens of thousands of Instagram followers in March 2020, Schock came out as gay. He recounted his conservative upbringing in the Apostolic Christian Church of the rural Midwest. It was, he admitted, an environment in which he "thrived."

Advertisement
Advertisement

"It helped me to live with a feeling of purpose and taught me to try to treat others as I would want to be treated. Memorizing Bible verses, going to church camp, attending service at least twice a week, that was my world."

In the Instagram post, he wrestled with the figure he had cut in Congress, writing that "I received a lot of attention" that he confessed to enjoying. Congress, Schock wrote, gave him "more excuses to buy time and avoid being the person I've always been." He recognized that he held a position on same-sex marriage that was consistent with the leaders of his party at the time but not true to himself.

"Whatever comes next for me, at least the story will be authentic, and good things usually follow from that," he wrote.

Gay and lesbian Democrats often responded to Schock's announcement by pointing to his voting record — against allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military, for example — as evidence of his hypocrisy. But those in the MAGA movement, seeking to expand Trump's coalition as he sought a return to the White House, embraced Schock.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In 2021, he traveled to Nashville to join former acting national intelligence director Richard Grenell at a pride event organized by the Log Cabin Republicans' media outlet Outspoken. Schock had first befriended Grenell, who had been the only openly gay acting Cabinet-level official in U.S. history, amid California's network of politically connected gay Republicans.

As big city hotel projects opened to the public, Schock's reputation stalked him. In a review of his Los Angeles airport hotels, influential travel blogger Ben Schlappig wrote: "All things considered I was impressed by this property, and in some ways I prefer it to the Hyatt Regency LAX. However, I wouldn't stay again, because I have issues supporting the owner and developer of the property (Aaron Schock)."

Schock soon turned to less flashy real estate projects. He founded Schock & Haywood to develop apartment complexes across Florida and Georgia. Its most ambitious undertaking, a St. Petersburg site that Schock partnered with a bitcoin mining company to purchase in 2022, fell into disrepair as they struggled to win financing for a 22-story tower. Schock and his partners sold the site in 2024 for $2.3 million less than they acquired it, at just two-thirds of their original asking price.

As one of the country's most prominent gay Republicans, Schock started trading ribbon cuttings for campaign stops. In 2024, he became one of the Log Cabin Republicans' most prominent surrogates as the group threw itself fully behind Trump's reelection. Schock spoke alongside Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz at a Log Cabin Republicans fundraiser in the Philadelphia suburbs, and then joined the group's "Trump Unity" tour through eight battleground states.

Advertisement
Advertisement

After the election, Schock received an offer from Harry Sargeant III, a Florida-based Republican donor and longtime investor in Venezuela who told POLITICO via text message he had known the former lawmaker for "many years." Schock was "engaged in or about February 2025 for a one-time lump sum payment of $100,000," according to Sargeant attorney Christopher Kise.

To keep his enterprise afloat in Venezuela, Sargeant needed to elevate those in the Trump administration who would push to repair relations rather than pursue regime change through punishing economic sanctions. In Papermaster's telling, Sargeant saw Grenell, a skeptic about American interventionism whom Trump tapped for an ambiguous special-envoy role, as a likely champion of that agenda — and wanted Schock to help guide his approach to the new administration.

The pay was for "strategic consulting," according to Kise, who denied that Schock was "engaged by Mr. Sargeant as a lobbyist and was not called on to perform lobbying services." Kise said that Sargeant did not hire Schock in an effort to lift sanctions on his oil business.

"The notion that a highly successful businessman, with extensive historic political ties would place Aaron Schock at the center of any effort regarding the Trump Administration or Venezuelan business matters is simply untenable," Kise continued in a May 8 letter, noting that Sargeant "has direct historic ties to Republican political circles, President Trump and his Administration, and to Venezuela."

Advertisement
Advertisement

On Jan. 15, 2025, according to a copy of his personal calendar, Schock traveled by private jet from Miami Beach to Aspen, for Gay Ski Week, billed as seven nights of skiing, concerts, film screenings and symposiums. At the St. Regis Resort, he found himself sharing drinks with a business consultant he knew from Los Angeles named Benjamin Papermaster. Papermaster had spent enough time within earshot of Schock's name-dropping to recognize the roll call of his contacts suddenly in the news — not just Grenell but incoming Trump Cabinet members whom he had served alongside in Congress like Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

If handled correctly, Papermaster argued, Schock's avocation as a Republican campaign surrogate could prove more lucrative than his chosen career in real estate. Papermaster volunteered to help manage a professional pivot.

"You're uniquely positioned to really take advantage of this," Papermaster recalls telling Schock. "This," he explained, "could be your chance to come back."

The Caracas gambit

Later that month, Schock headed to Caracas. According to a record of his credit card charges, he ate at one of the city's most venerable steakhouses and stayed at a five-star hotel five miles from Miraflores Palace, the presidential office that during Trump's first term had been the subject of a so-called maximum-pressure campaign from hawks like then-Republican Sen. Marco Rubio.

Schock would recount to Papermaster that it was during a meeting with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez that he heard the promise that bound him to the agenda of those who wanted a softer touch on Venezuela. If he managed to keep the hawks at bay during Trump's second term, Schock told Papermaster, Rodriguez said she would award him a piece of her country's sizable precious metals economy — his own gold mine. (Jihad Smaili, an American lawyer registered to lobby on Rodriguez's behalf, said he would provide a comment for this article but did not.)

Schock grasped at the chance to diversify his benefactors beyond Sargeant. He was, after all, a real estate guy. He could see a gleaming finished property where others saw only a vacant lot. And the opinion landscape in Washington around Venezuela was exactly that. Now was time to build.

Schock set out to identify energy interests whose stakes in Venezuela led them to back a more dovish approach. Between ski trips to Mont Tremblant and Yellowstone, Schock worked with Papermaster to enlist a group of heavy-hitting bondholders who agreed to jointly finance a costly campaign to undermine the hawkish objectives of Rubio, now secretary of State, according to messages between them.

"Rubio is pushing regime change--using same maximum pressure as last time," Schock wrote to allies in a WhatsApp group chat last spring, one of a number of messages in which Schock attempted to convey his knowledge of executive branch workings. The White House did not comment on Schock's administration contacts.

Yet Schock's mind was never fully dedicated to American foreign policy. The agenda for a March 31 phone call between Schock and Papermaster, as detailed in a screenshot obtained by POLITICO: "Hotel remodel: sales, interiors, club/meeting space/drive/lawn; VZ: funds, message."

Expense records submitted by Papermaster to a lawyer for one of Sargeant's companies paint the portrait of the frenetic and high-flying life Schock maintained at his patron's expense. (Schock acknowledged to Papermaster in a May 2025 message obtained by POLITICO that he fronted Papermaster's "expenses from Harry as well as your last month's pay despite not getting reimbursed from him.") The attorney, Ali Rahman, confirmed a payment to a vendor at least once in a message to Papermaster. Rahman did not respond to a request for comment for this article.

"Mr. Sargeant never agreed to pay, never paid, and never received any invoice, billing or reimbursement request for any alleged Schock expenses," Kise wrote in a letter to POLITICO.

Over the five months beginning March 6, Schock tallied $185,000 in what he labeled business expenses, including flights, meals, Uber rides and stays at high-end hotels worldwide, including the Nikki Beach resort in Mallorca and Kimpton Shorebreak in southern California. Schock invoiced Sargeant for both subscriptions to OnlyFans, the platform dominated by adult-video content, and a $7,000 campaign contribution — the legal maximum for a campaign year — to Rep. Andy Barr, who is running to replace fellow Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. (Barr did not respond to a request for comment.)

Despite engaging with Rodriguez and other interests in Venezuela, Schock did not file a notice of those activities under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, which covers public relations and lobbying campaigns. Legal experts interviewed by POLITICO say it is unclear how the law and its exemptions would apply to Schock's situation.

When a collaborator on the Venezuela campaign asked in a group-chat exchange whether Schock needed documentation for "FARA purposes," Schock did not directly respond.

He avoided registering, according to Papermaster, because he was intent on keeping the congressional member's pin that stood as his most prized possession through its ability to grant continued access to the House floor. A former lawmaker who registers as a foreign agent loses those privileges.

Schock had left Congress months before Trump began his takeover of the Republican Party, but maintained an instinctive understanding of how to move public opinion around Trump's Washington. Out were the press conferences and constituent fly-ins, in were social-media influencers and cable advertising strategies aimed at one man's viewing habits.

"What does a four week rotator buy in the DC metro area cost?" Schock asked at one point, to a group chat of people working in concert to effect change in Venezuela. "I'm assuming Fox and Newsmax does the trick? Flood it and if he extends we switch to a thank you, Mr. President?! Or not necessary. We can worry about this latter [sic]. But having a bunch of Mississippi refinery workers thanking him for saving their job, and even some Venezuelans who say you're giving us hope and opportunity to stay in the country we love because of USA companies and their investment."

Schock helped the investor coalition hire Forward Global, a Paris-based firm which specialized in paying those with large social media followings to post and share political content, and began to coordinate Venezuela-related messaging with former officeholders, MAGA activists and online-famous influencers.

Kise said "there is no evidence Mr. Sargeant ever engaged Forward Global or worked with Forward Global."

"Our engagement last spring with Mr. Sargeant, Mr. Schock, and Mr. Papermaster was a specific advisory campaign related to a communications and brand management program in support of President Trump and the U.S.' energy policy in Venezuela," Forward Global said in a statement provided to POLITICO. FARA registration was unnecessary, the firm wrote, because it "was retained by a U.S. client to assist U.S. entities with a domestic communications campaign. The firm did not act on behalf of or at the direction or control of any foreign persons in connection with this work and did not at any time have an obligation to register."

To personally wound the hawks circling Trump, including Rubio ally Mauricio Claver-Carone, Schock looked to Trump confidante Laura Loomer, who said she first met him at a Mar-a-Lago fundraiser for Florida Rep. Byron Donalds in 2024. Schock believed Loomer, who had since become skilled at administration personnel fights, could help tarnish them in Trump's eyes as long as he armed her with the right intelligence. Loomer denied in an interview that she was part of the influence operation or paid for her work.

"But i need opposition files on these people. Which is what i said a month ago about Mauricio," Schock wrote to Papermaster. "again, its like i dont know how to win in politics." He added two emojis: an upside-down smile and a shrug.

Schock was again a Washington player, according to his calendar and credit card transactions, racking up thousand-dollar-plus tabs for meals at power spots like Cafe Milano and Joe's Seafood, Prime Steak & Stone Crab, ingratiating himself to high-level administration officials through meetings at the Hay-Adams Hotel and at members-only club the Ned as he attempted to redraw American foreign policy.

But his reputation followed Schock into meetings he desperately wanted to be about something else. "His Wikipedia page used to just irk the fuck out of him," Papermaster recalled in an interview. It read … resigned from Congress in March 2015 amid a scandal involving his use of public and campaign funds. …  used taxpayer money to fund "lavish" trips and events.

Papermaster suggested Schock retain the services of New York publicist Matthew Hiltzik to help paper over his Wikipedia. "I wanted to follow up and see if there have been any updates regarding research into Aaron Schock, particularly in terms of reputation rehabilitation," Papermaster wrote Hiltzik on March 19, according to an email obtained by POLITICO. (Hiltzik declined to comment on his interactions with Schock or Papermaster.)

It was almost a decade to the date of Schock's resignation from Congress.

That spring, in a message just between the two of them, Papermaster brought up how to secure public relations help papering over his biography.

"I thought your friends was [sic] going to pay for the reputation repair?" Papermaster wrote in a WhatsApp chat.

"Who?" Schock responded. "I don't have any friends. Lol. Only users."

After the gold rush

To Papermaster, Schock appeared motivated by the twin goals of restoring his reputation and consummating the gold deal he said was pledged to him by Rodriguez.

"Dude," Papermaster remembers telling Schock upon his return from Caracas, "that is the dumbest fucking idea."

Papermaster argued to Schock that cartels and gangsters control the gold mines. "Lord knows, you're not going to fucking mine the gold."

Nevertheless, Schock instructed Papermaster to begin making preparations for what he would do once it became his. At Schock's request, Papermaster suggested the name of a metallurgist who could refine the gold he acquired, according to a screenshot of a Feb. 18 text exchange reviewed by POLITICO.

But Schock could never let go. "He's got blinders on for everything else besides the Venezuela oil deal, and that's all he cares about, because he's got dollar signs in his eyes and can't see anything else," Papermaster said earlier this year.

Schock became swept up in the trappings of his role as a global fixer. He instructed Papermaster to price a private jet for travel by air, Papermaster recalled, and demanded a Mercedes-Benz Metris van to move securely on the ground. He partied at night and slept late into the mornings, according to Papermaster, who quit working for Schock in the fall after he says Schock failed to consistently pay him for his work and make himself available for meetings and phone calls.

That December, Schock celebrated the holidays honoring his new life and old one, according to entries on his calendar. He had the Schock Family Christmas back in Peoria on Dec. 13, suggesting he may have found a way to reconcile with his family. And four days later, back in Arlington, he had a Make Christmas Great Again celebration.

By April of this year, though, things seemed to be looking up for Schock. His campaign had failed to weaken Rubio, but when the United States military removed Maduro it left the regime in place. The U.S. restored diplomatic relations with Venezuela, then eased bank sanctions. Throughout it all Rodriguez solidified her hold on Miraflores Palace.

"It would seem that based on what he had been told that things would be lining up for him," Papermaster, who had not communicated with Schock for more than six months, observed from afar.

Last month, Schock arrived back in Venezuela, according to a Copa Airlines flight itinerary reviewed by POLITICO, but this time he went first not to Caracas, the seat of Venezuelan government power.

Instead Schock landed in Valencia, in Carabobo province, where foreign adventurers first struck gold in 1551. In 2017, rumors that someone had again struck gold there drew 3,000 miners to a small farming hamlet where they dug pits deep in the earth, looking for more.

Up next
MS NOW

Trump’s ‘Meet the Press’ walkout shows a presidency that’s already finished

Matthew Bartlett
4 min read
Add Yahoo on Google

On Sunday, President Trump quit an interview with Kristen Welker of "Meet the Press" after becoming frustrated as he faced challenging questions. Fighting with the media is nothing new for the president, but the notion of giving up midway through when things get tough may be more indicative of Trump's current mindset and emblematic of his second presidency.

Usually, it is difficult to tell when a presidency is over. Officially, Jan. 20 every four (or eight) years marks the end of a presidency. But long before that comes the moment when a president loses potency, ceases to be a driving force and is reduced to reaction. It is like the moment when your new car becomes just your car: You don't know when it happened precisely, but you know it's in the past.

In the year and half since Trump's return, it seems everything has changed — except the economy.

In the 2024 election, voters gave Trump what few get in life: a mulligan. Trump received a political do-over. But as the GOP celebrated its 2024 wins, an irrational exuberance took over. It forgot — or never realized — that along with a do-over for Trump, voters gave Republicans a mandate to focus on the stubborn issues of affordability that continue to plague the post-Covid economy. For Americans of all ages, living, eating, breathing and simply going to work is incredibly and increasingly unaffordable, much less doing it all with a family.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Long after Inauguration Day celebrations ended, the GOP kept partying, while the country saw norms shattered, DOGE shuttered and citizens shot by ICE. Then came a war with Iran that has Americans emptying their wallets to fill their gas tanks. Inflation is creeping back up, while Americans' savings are going down.

In the year and half since Trump's return, it seems everything has changed — except the economy. It is very hard to say that the president's second act has improved the lives or financial status of many, unless of course your last name is Trump. His second administration has been a historic misread of a political mandate, and a tragic mistake of a presidency.

While it's clear that Trump maintains an iron grip on the GOP, what good is that if he does nothing with it to alleviate the hardships of the American people? To date the administration and GOP have offered no economic agenda or ideas for the future. The only thing Republicans on the hill are focused on is giving more money to the Department of Homeland Security — which had already been given so much money it started to buy two private jets, one with a bar and a bedroom.

The president has lost all credibility on the economy, the No. 1 priority of the American public. He has lost control over ending the war. The administration is rudderless. Trump is enamored with being president, yet wants nothing to do with the job. His Cabinet members turn their attention from serving the people to appeasing their boss. Many top officials now hold their jobs in an acting capacity — not just in title but in their emphasis on performance for an audience of one.

Things are bleak for the party in control of all three branches of the federal government.

After giving up on governing, with no vision, the president has turned to what's simply in his line of sight. Event after unrelated event, speech after rambling speech, he is obsessed with what he perceives as the beautification of his D.C. bubble. He talks about fountains, his arch and ballroom, a repainted reflecting pool, a UFC fight at the White House and a partisan rally for himself after the failure of a planned concert on the National Mall. His appointees propose plastering his face on passports and $250 bills. Banners with Trump's looming image adorn government buildings in Washington while he rants about not being able to put his name on the Kennedy Center.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Things are bleak for the party in control of all three branches of the federal government. The Democrats seem to offer no discernible plan for the economy or other pressing issues, but when voters want to throw the bums out, not being the "bums" in power may be enough.

The 2026 midterms are on the horizon, and the 2028 presidential race will begin the day after.

In a matter of months, attention will soon move from the White House to the campaign trail, and even successful presidents struggle to keep the spotlight off their potential successors. Candidates from both parties will have a chance to define themselves and offer their ideas on everything from artificial intelligence to taxes to war and peace. America's next act will be written not in the Oval Office or the halls of Congress, but in the town halls and events across America.

Meanwhile, the second Trump administration is already a lost cause at home and abroad. He has made himself a lame duck president, and is getting lamer every day.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The post Trump's 'Meet the Press' walkout shows a presidency that's already finished appeared first on MS NOW.

This article was originally published on ms.now

Up next
The Independent

Trump storms out of NBC interview after being fact-checked about his $1.8B ‘slush fund’ and election fraud

John Bowden
Updated
5 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Trump storms out of NBC interview after being fact-checked about his $1.8B ‘slush fund’ and election fraud
Trump storms out of NBC interview after being fact-checked about his $1.8B ‘slush fund’ and election fraud
  • President Trump abruptly ended an interview with NBC's Kristen Welker after being challenged on false claims about the 2020 election and efforts to reward political allies, including rioters who sought to overturn the election.

President Donald Trump abruptly ended an interview with NBC's Kristen Welker and walked out after he was challenged on his false claims about the 2020 election and his efforts to reward political allies, including rioters who sought to force Congress to overturn the election.

In an interview that aired Sunday on Meet the Press, the president said that he would be "disappointed" if Congress failed to pass nearly $1.8 billion in funding for an "anti-weaponization fund" meant to reward those targeted for prosecution by the Justice Department under former President Joe Biden.

But after clashing with Welker over his false assertions about voter fraud in 2020, which led to the January 6 attack on the Capitol and his own prosecution, the president snapped at the anchor: "Let's call it quits, because I've had enough. Thank you, darling."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Before that explosive moment, Trump had revived his calls for Congress to pass $1.776 billion in funding to award January 6 rioters and others who were prosecuted by the Department of Justice under Biden's presidency, after hundreds of his supporters stormed the Capitol and were arrested for crimes ranging from unauthorized entry to assaulting police and even sedition.

"If it was up to me, I'd pay them the kind of money that they deserve. People have been destroyed. Lives have been destroyed. Many suicides, think of it," Trump told Welker in a pre-recorded that aired Sunday.

"I think the weaponization fund is a great idea, and so do many other Republicans. You have to get it approved. If they get it approved, that's great. If they don't get it approved, I'd be disappointed," he added.

Donald Trump abruptly got up and left during an interview with Kristen Welker on NBC (NBC/Meet the Press)
Donald Trump abruptly got up and left during an interview with Kristen Welker on NBC (NBC/Meet the Press)

Trump and his allies sought to introduce the fund last month, aimed at providing payouts to people federally prosecuted under the Biden administration including the hundreds of Americans convicted of crimes related to January 6.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The fund was challenged in federal court and temporarily halted by a judge. The ensuing uproar among Republicans over the unpopular measure also caused acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to declare that the Trump administration was backing down.

Blanche told lawmakers this week that the fund was "not moving forward." In a court filing on Friday, government attorneys said the administration "will not" revive the fund.

But Trump showed no signs of that in his interview with Welker, and instead clashed with the anchor over whether he provided "evidence" of his claims about the 2020 election as part of his efforts to overturn the results.

"You're either crooked or you're stupid," he told Welker at one point.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump also claimed during his Meet the Press interview that the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago was an example of the Biden administration's overreach. He was investigated after leaving the White House in 2021 for allegedly concealing or improperly withholding White House documents.

"They went after me more than anybody else," Trump told NBC. "They raided Mar-a-Lago and all the other things. But people have been badly hurt. They've committed suicide. They've lost their jobs."

The interview also focused significantly on Trump's war with Iran, with the president directly threatening the use of military force to secure Iran's remaining reserves of enriched uranium. Arguing that the dangers of not halting Iran's nuclear program were too important to ignore, Trump refused to say whether fuel prices had peaked and denied that he has gone back on campaign promises by launching the war.

"I didn't promise anything. I don't like these endless wars. This is not an endless war," he told Welker.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"The way you [secure the nuclear material] is if we make a deal, if we make a deal now we're friendly, we'll all go together," he said. "It'll be our equipment. We'll take [the nuclear material] out and destroy it... Now, if we don't make a deal, then we're going to take them out militarily very harshly."

He eventually ended the interview early and stormed off after a heated back-and-forth with Welker, telling her: "You're a one-sided crooked network. Sorry. Let's call it quits because I've had enough. Thank you, darling. Have a good time."

The budget reconciliation package that would fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement for three years is now in the House after passing the Senate early Friday. Senate Republican lawmakers revolted over the president's desire for the fund, warning that the ICE bill would not pass with it attached.

Republicans confronted Blanche over the issue at a contentious meeting before the Memorial Day holiday last month, and eventually passed the reconciliation package through the Senate without funding for the payouts.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The "slush fund" has been met with fierce resistance in Congress, and Republican leadership in the Senate spent hours last week defeating Republican-led attempts to add language to the reconciliation package restricting the White House from implementing the fund at all. Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick has threatened to force a vote on a similar measure as the bill moves to the House.

"The votes are not there, and will not be there, to give a dime to this fund," Fitzpatrick said Sunday during an interview on CNN's State of the Union.

Former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell derided the idea as "utterly stupid" in a statement after members met with Blanche last month.

"So the nation's top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong – Take your pick," the former GOP leader said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McConnell's onetime counterpart Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, reveled in the issue's ability to divide the Republican caucus as lawmakers debated the reconciliation package.

"Republicans are in complete disarray, they're at each other's throats and the American are suffering for it," he said last month. "Republicans have tied themselves up in knots and torn each other to shreds over Trump's brazenly corrupt slush fund for his billionaire cronies and January 6 insurrectionists."

Up next
Politico

This World Leader Took on Trump Over Iran — and It’s Paying Off

Aitor Hernández-Morales
20 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Spain Pope
Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez attends a meeting between Pope Leo XIV and the members of the Spanish Parliament, at the Congress of Deputies, in Madrid, Monday, June 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)

MADRID — When Europe's leaders hold their periodic gatherings in Brussels, Pedro Sánchez isn't often at the center of media attention.

As a rule, when Spain's 54-year-old prime minister strides down the red carpet below the giant glass oval structure in which the EU's heads of government meet, only Spanish reporters surge forward to shout out questions about domestic affairs. Correspondents from other countries tend to focus on their own leaders, or chase after French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz or Italian premier Giorgia Meloni — the heavyweights most consider to truly "run" the EU.

But at recent summits, Sánchez has been met by unusually swollen packs of journalists elbowing one another while waving microphones, eager to hear what he has to say.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why the sudden surge of interest?

It's not because his government is doing well at home. The prime minister's fragile coalition has been abandoned by its parliamentary partners and is incapable of passing legislation. Moreover, a succession of corruption scandals involving members of Sánchez's inner circle are undermining his administration.

Instead, the attention on Spain's prime minister is driven by the fact that the head of a country better known for its beaches and nightlife has lately become the unlikely face of Europe's opposition to the war in Iran and, more broadly, to U.S. President Donald Trump.

When the U.S. and Israel began their attack on Iran in late February, Spain's prime minister stood out as the sole EU leader to openly condemn the military operation. In contrast to figures like Macron and Merz, who opted for a cautious, hedged reaction to the conflict, Sánchez's denunciation of the "illegitimate" aggression was unequivocally blunt.

Advertisement
Advertisement

So was Washington's reaction to the Spaniard's criticism. Sánchez's decision to bar U.S. warplanes from using jointly operated bases and the country's airspace infuriated Trump. Calling Spain "terrible" and "unfriendly," the president threatened to cut off all trade relations with Madrid, and later suggested the country should be booted from NATO.

By singling out Sánchez, the White House inadvertently helped turn Spain's isolated opposition to the war into a position embraced by nearly all of Europe. In response to the threats, EU leaders scrambled to express support for their colleague in Madrid — and, emboldened, joined him in condemning the attacks on Iran.

In the span of just a few months, Spain's prime minister went from being an outlier in Europe to the EU's moral leader.

"Spain was never alone," said Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares, a longtime Sánchez ally, in an interview. "We were simply first, leading so that others could follow behind."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Sánchez's newfound prominence on the international stage is all the more striking because it comes at a moment of profound vulnerability at home. Although Spain's leader has not been implicated in the scandals that hound his government, political opponents have endeavored to link him to the criminal cases.

"Pedro Sánchez is synonymous with corruption," said Senator Alicia García, spokesperson for the center-right People's Party, during a recent session of the Spanish Senate.

Yet respect and admiration for the prime minister continues to grow in the rest of Europe. That's because his opposition to Trump reflects the majority view on the continent that the U.S. president poses a major threat to the bloc.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Overall, Europe's leaders have been reluctant to clash with Trump. The U.S. is one of the EU's largest trading partners, and maintaining stable ties is considered essential for countries like Germany. Additionally, despite Trump's efforts to undermine NATO, European defense continues to not only be U.S.-led, but U.S.-centered.

But Sánchez is an exception to that status quo.

Spain's limited trade relations with the U.S. means the country is shielded from Trump's tariff threats, and it is also geographically distant from potential military threats. The country is even comparatively immune from Iran-related energy shocks, thanks to a renewable energy boom spearheaded by Sánchez that has earned plaudits from the rest of Europe.

The prime minister's allies argue his consistently defiant stance toward Trump is driven less by pragmatism than conviction. At a moment when multilateralism and the postwar global order are seen as outdated concepts, the center-left moderate is described as a true believer, willing to defy the most powerful country in the world in defense of those ideals.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"He's always been committed to the respect for human rights, the dignity of all people," said Albares. "It's just what he truly believes in."

Sánchez — who declined to be interviewed for this article but allowed members of his administration to participate — has urged his European counterparts to follow Spain's example. During POLITICO's European Pulse Forum in Barcelona last April, he called for Europe to "rearm itself morally, so that it can contribute to stable and peaceful development throughout the world."

"Europe's citizens don't want their leaders to look the other way, to be self-absorbed," he said. "They want them to get involved in finding the solutions to the global challenges facing humanity."

The moral stance underpinning the Spanish prime minister's opposition to Trump can, paradoxically, be traced back to a link forged in the U.S. president's hometown.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Shortly after graduating with a degree in economics and business administration in Madrid in 1995, Sánchez moved to New York City to work at a consultancy. While there, Carlos Westendorp, the late Spanish ambassador to the United Nations — whose wife was an acquaintance of Sánchez's parents, two solidly middle class civil servants — began inviting him over for meals.

The inquisitive 24-year-old won the former foreign minister over by peppering him with questions about international affairs and eventually became a mentee of sorts. After Westendorp was named High Representative for Bosnia in 1997, he reached out to Sánchez — who by then was wrapping up a stint as an assistant in the European Parliament in Brussels — and offered him a spot on his team.

The Spaniard arrived in a city "in which every building was pockmarked by bullets" fired during nearly four years of siege. Journalist Victoria García, at the time the U.N. mission's spokesperson, recalled the women on the staff fawning over the handsome, 6-foot-3-inch Sánchez.

"But he was more than just a pretty face, [he was] a hell of a hard worker," she said in an interview. "That country had been reduced to rubble and we were charged with redesigning it from scratch, coming up with a constitution, a criminal system, even the flag and national anthem."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sánchez, who had just earned his masters degree in economics from the Free University of Brussels, was brought on board as an economic adviser and tasked with laying out Bosnia's future financial system in a series of complex position papers. In an early sign that he could be headstrong when defending matters he believed in, García said Sánchez clashed with a high-ranking American representative who offhandedly dismissed his policy proposals.

"He was just a kid, but he'd push back hard," she recalled. "He wouldn't hold back."

As U.N. peacekeepers attempted to keep violence between Croats, Serbs and Muslims from flaring up again, Sánchez travelled across Bosnia with Westendorp, attending meetings with regional leaders. According to García, it was impossible for anyone on the team to not emerge from their time in Bosnia "with a newfound understanding of the importance of multilateralism and the rule of law, and a profound respect for the work done by organizations like the U.N."

In his 2019 memoir, Manual de Resistencia — which translates to "Resistance Manual" — Sánchez said his experience in Sarajevo "inoculated him from the ravages of nationalism and identity politics."

Advertisement
Advertisement

"I saw unscrupulous politicians who don't consider the consequences of their hate speech — not the social, political, or economic ones," he wrote. "Or rather, it's not that they don't consider them, it's that they feed the worst in their people, because they thrive on that confrontation."

The prime minister recalled sleepless nights during which "U.S. jetfighters and bombers flew over the city, en route to Serbia and Kosovo," where Washington was attempting to stop ethnic cleansing. In his book, Sánchez praised then-U.S. President Bill Clinton's "brave decision" to bomb Yugoslavia — a measure "few of his countrymen supported."

"I saw a man deeply involved, who truly committed himself, his presidency, and his country to ending a deadly war," wrote Sánchez in 2019. Lamenting America's withdrawal from multilateralism under Trump, he noted the isolationist Republican president was "no Clinton."

Despite his deep admiration for the U.N.'s work, García said Sánchez was always clear-eyed about wanting a future in Spanish politics. When Westendorp would travel back to Spain to attend Socialist Party conferences, the young Spaniard would push to accompany him so as to make contacts within the political organization.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Sánchez believed in what we were doing in Bosnia," she said. "But even then it was obvious that he was a political animal with aspirations that were bigger than Sarajevo."

The lessons Sánchez drew from Bosnia would remain largely invisible for years. But they would eventually become central to how he viewed conflicts abroad, the role of international institutions and the obligations of democratic governments in moments of crisis.

Sánchez's political convictions would soon collide with the realities of political survival.

When his time on Westendorp's staff concluded in 1999, the Spaniard returned to Madrid, entering local politics as a member of the Socialist Party. He remained a backbench figure for over a decade, but in 2014 he launched an unexpectedly successful dark horse bid to become party leader.

Albares, then a career diplomat, recalled first meeting Sánchez at that time and being entranced by the young and dynamic Socialist leader — the first frontline Spanish politician to speak English fluently and regularly read the international press. The future foreign minister was so taken by Sánchez that he eventually took a leave of absence from the diplomatic service to become his adviser on global affairs.

"I made that decision because I was impressed by his defense of the same principles he continues to uphold today," said Albares. "He had, and continues to have, a clear vision of the European project and its values, earnest concern about climate change, the defense of gender equality, a profound respect for the United Nations and multilateralism, and of the idea that the dignity and human rights of every human being must always be respected."

At a time when populist forces were steadily gaining traction among voters, Albares thought Sánchez was just the man to lead Spain. But the Socialists' old guard was unconvinced by their new leader, who questioned the decentralized party structure that gave disproportionate power to its regional leaders.

Sánchez had taken the reins of the center-left party amid a crippling economic crisis that hastened the collapse of Spain's bipartisan political system, and new far-left and economic-liberal political groups ate away at the Socialists' traditional voting base. Seizing on a series of electoral setbacks, the old guard painted Sánchez as an overwhelmed novice and forced him to step down in Oct. 2016.

For many politicians, that would have been the end. But for Sánchez, it was the beginning of an unlikely comeback. In a move that has since become Spanish political lore, he embarked on a grassroots campaign to win back support, traveling across the country in his Peugeot, meeting party members face-to-face and rebuilding his base from the ground up.

Accompanying him were several figures that have since become major liabilities for Sánchez. Among them were José Luis Ábalos, who would eventually be appointed transport and public works minister — but today is imprisoned on corruption charges — and Santos Cerdán, who would become one of the most powerful figures in the Socialist Party before being implicated in a kickback scandal.

Sánchez's odyssey coincided with Trump's surprise defeat of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election and the first months of his administration. Albares, who remained loyal to the ousted Socialist leader, said they followed the developments with fascination and discussed the impact of Trump's measures on the rest of the world.

"The conversations were not, and to this day are not, about what the U.S. president does, but rather about the context in which those actions place Spain," he said. "They were always about how we stay true to our principles, how we meet our objectives within that context."

Albares said Sánchez remained an indefatigable, cheerful figure on the cross-country tour. "Even at the lowest moments, he has this enthusiasm rooted in an unwavering belief in his project," he said. "And I think Spaniards perceived and rewarded that determination."

The retail politicking paid off. When elections were held to select the Socialist Party's new leader in May 2017, Sánchez handily defeated his rivals and was restored to the post from which he was ousted seven months before.

During his second turn in his party's top spot, Sánchez took pains to not repeat the mistakes that had led to his downfall. Moving swiftly to reshape the party in his own image, he sidelined internal opponents and transformed the Socialists into the hyper-centralized, leader-driven organization that it is today.

His next move was even more brazen. Capitalizing on a series of devastating corruption scandals, in 2018 Sánchez orchestrated a no-confidence vote to topple then-Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy — a maneuver unprecedented in modern Spanish politics. The bid succeeded, swiftly transforming the once ousted opposition leader into Spain's head of government.

At a summit of global mayors in Madrid last April, municipal leaders from around the world cheered after Sánchez gave a speech in defense of open cities that embrace migrants and diversity.

"He's a rockstar, he's exactly what the world needs: a progressive who isn't afraid of Trump," said an American municipal official who I agreed not to name because of his concerns that federal funding for his city could be jeopardized by a perceived criticism of the U.S. president.

Sánchez's popularity and perceived strength on the global stage contrasts with his divisive reputation and a weak domestic political position — one that isn't solely motivated by the corruption scandals involving members of his inner circle.

While the prime minister has managed to remain in power for the past eight years, he has always led fragile minority governments that required the support of smaller parties to get legislation through Spain's fractured parliament. The Socialist leader often says he operates by "making virtue of necessity" — in other words, by adapting his positions to align with strategic partners.

But that pragmatism has not gone down well among Spaniards. Prior to Sánchez, they had never experienced a coalition government at the national level or the flexibility required to make them work.

One of Sánchez's most controversial measures remains his 2023 move to amnesty separatist politicians who led an independence movement in the Spanish region of Catalonia. The decision — a complete reversal of his longstanding opposition to the clemency measure — was key to winning the support of the Catalan parties he needed to remain prime minister, but it alienated voters, many of whom have yet to forgive him for the U-turn.

According to the latest monthly survey conducted by Spain's state-run Center for Sociological Research while Sánchez ranks as the country's highest-rated political leader, 63 percent of Spaniards say they trust him "little, or not at all."

Meanwhile, the separatist politicians with whom Sánchez made the amnesty deal have since abandoned the prime minister, which is why his minority government currently lacks the backing required to pass laws, much less a fresh budget.

And then there are the scandals.

Sánchez came to power in 2018 promising clean government, but over the past years many of his closest allies — among them his cross-country campaign companions, Ábalos and Cerdán — have been prosecuted for alleged corruption.

That situation worsened last month, after Spain's National Court indicted former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero — whom Sánchez had previously described as "an example to follow and a source of inspiration" — for money laundering, influence peddling and other criminal offenses. Just days later, agents of the Civil Guard's elite Central Operative Unit raided the ruling party's headquarters in an unrelated investigation into an elaborate scheme to discredit Sánchez's critics.

These latest developments appear to mark a breaking point for the prime minister's parliamentary allies. Regional groups like the Basque Nationalist Party, which Sánchez depends on to pass legislation, seem increasingly wary of being associated with the ruling party's scandals and are now calling for early elections.

But leaving office is ultimately up to the prime minister. Spain's opposition is too split to force him from power, and Sánchez has vowed to serve out the legislative term, which is due to end in August 2027.

The current deadlock could make Sánchez lean even harder into international affairs, said Pablo Simón, a political scientist at Madrid's Carlos III University. "The parliamentary paralysis impedes him from doing anything at home, but abroad he can make the most of personal political positions that happen to be quite aligned with that of most Spaniards."

The strategy has worked well for Sánchez in the past.

Following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, in which some 1,200 people were killed in Israel, Spain's prime minister made headlines by speaking out against the military operations in Gaza, describing them as "genocide." The stance led Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar to label him "a disgrace to Spain," but boosted Sánchez's standing domestically.

Opposition to Trump's policies have similarly benefitted Sánchez. Spaniards overwhelmingly backed the prime minister when he rebuffed the U.S. president's push to increase NATO's defense spending targets and refused to ramp up Madrid's military expenditures. However, it's Sánchez's stance against the war in Iran that really resonated with Spaniards, who are among the Europeans most opposed to the operation.

In recent POLITICO polling, 56 percent of Spanish respondents said they strongly disapprove of the offensive, and 43 percent said Madrid should publicly oppose the military operation and push for an end to the conflict. And a majority of Spanish respondents — 51 percent — also said Washington poses a "threat" to Europe, the largest proportion of the six EU countries polled.

It's unclear if the latest controversies will undo the domestic gains Sánchez has made on the back of global politics. But polling conducted before the most recent corruption cases were reported suggests that if elections were held today, Sánchez's scandal-ridden Socialist Party would still win the greatest share of the vote.

"By taking on Trump, he's managed to make Spaniards talk far less about domestic squabbles and corruption, and focus on international politics," said Simón. "Trump's nature is to fill the space and constantly draw attention to himself, and that makes the act of opposing him a constantly relevant action — and Sánchez's decision to oppose him an undeniable success."

Sánchez and Trump may be ideologically opposed, but they share one notable trait: Both molded established political parties around themselves after surviving political defeats that might have ended others' careers.

Diego Rubio, a 39-year-old Oxford-educated scholar who has served as the Spanish prime minister's chief of staff since 2024, described Sánchez as a born fighter.

"He's a self-made man who only ended up in this position by overcoming the status quo within his own party," he said. "He isn't like other prime ministers that were named by the party to be their candidate — he had to fight to remain in his own party."

"Given that spirit has worked out pretty well for him, why would he do anything differently now?" he asked.

Rubio said progressive politicians on both sides of the Atlantic had avoided direct confrontations with rising populist leaders, failing to challenge their talking points.

"Over here we had the advantage of seeing Hillary [Clinton] and others fail, of seeing that saying things like 'Trump is a liar' isn't enough to stop these people," he said. "You have to fight. Left-wing leaders are elected to fight — inequality, injustice, the big guys that make our society worse."

According to Rubio, the fundamental difference between Spain's prime minister and the U.S. president is that while neither backs down from a fight, "Sánchez never insults, never attacks people's families."

Since coming to power in 2018, the prime minister's outspoken defense of progressive ideas have made him an outlier in an EU that has drifted to the right.

Out of the bloc's 27 heads of government, Sánchez is one of the only three center-left prime ministers currently in power. The other two are Maltese leader Robert Abela, and Denmark's Mette Frederiksen, who has faced Trump's wrath over her refusal to give in to his annexationist designs on Greenland.

Arguably, Sánchez's clash with Trump has made him less isolated within the bloc.

At last March's summit of EU leaders in Brussels, heads of government from all political backgrounds sided with the Spaniard and adopted meeting conclusions rebuking Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's attacks on Iran. Coalescing around Sánchez, they pointedly called for "full respect of international law by all parties, including the principles of the United Nations Charter and international humanitarian law."

Still, the perception of being a lone progressive surrounded by an increasingly right-wing world could benefit Sánchez domestically ahead of Spain's next general election.

When voters last went to the polls, in the summer of 2023, the Socialist leader stoked fears of a coalition government made up of the center-right People's Party and the far-right Vox group. That scenario spooked electors into giving left-wing groups better than expected results, and Sánchez a path to remain in power.

This time around, he could repeat the strategy by focusing voters' attention on France, where the far-right National Rally party is projected to sweep next spring's elections. Many expect Sánchez to urge Spaniards to keep him in government by warning Madrid could go the way of Paris.

Political analyst Simón said betting domestic election results on international developments was an unorthodox move. "Developments in Syria rarely shape electoral outcomes in [the Spanish region of] Soria," he quipped.

But, he added, Sánchez is wise to continue making waves on the global stage. "Casting himself as the defender of multilateralism is working out for him personally, both in the outside world, and by consolidating him internally as the country's leading political progressive."

The political scientist said the prime minister's fight with Trump had also raised the country's profile across the globe, and reinforced its position as a player within Europe.

"Let's be honest," Simón said. "This is working out for Spain, too."

It's unclear if Sánchez's domestic troubles will eventually catch up with him, and his parliamentary position remains precarious. But for now, Spain's prime minister has turned a moment of political vulnerability into an opportunity for himself, his country — and perhaps the EU as a whole.

Sánchez, once a peripheral figure in continental affairs, has become one of Europe's most closely watched leaders. And as the jostling reporters at EU summits make clear, the world is now paying attention.

Advertisement