Chapter
Octisalate
In subject area: Medicine and Dentistry
In subject area: Medicine and Dentistry
You might find these chapters and articles relevant to this topic.
Chapter
Octisalate
Other names: Ethylhexyl salicylate, Octyl salicylate
INCI: Ethylhexyl salicylate
CAS no: 118-60-5
Molecular formula: C15H22O3
Molecular weight: 250.33
Rank of popularity: 55/502
Intended function: Fragrance, UV absorber, UV filter
Log P: 5.93
Allergenic potential: Weak sensitizer (max dose = 36.5 μg/cm2/hr)
Chapter
Homosalate is one of the most commonly used UVB filters in sunscreens in the US market. It belongs to the salicylate class and has a peak absorption of 306 nm. It is approved by the FDA for a maximum concentration of 15%. Along with other salicylates such as octisalate, it is a weak absorber and is often used in combination with other organic absorbers.
Octocrylene is another widely used UVB filter. This molecule has the unique role in stabilizing avobenzone, the only long-range organic UVA filter available in the United States. Without octocrylene, avobenzone is degraded by 50% upon 1 hour of UV exposure, rendering the sunscreen less effective. Octocrylene has a thick, oily texture, and a peak absorption at 303 nm (range 290–360 nm).
Q50.2 Para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) was one of the first chemical sunscreens to be widely available. However, its use in modern-day sunscreens has been limited for several reasons. This UVB filter required an alcoholic vehicle, it stained clothing, and it was associated with a number of adverse reactions, including subjective stinging and allergic contact dermatitis. Ester derivatives, mainly padimate O (octyl dimethyl PABA), became more popular with greater compatibility in a variety of cosmetic vehicles and a lower potential for staining or other adverse reactions. Despite being a potent UVB absorber, problems with PABA formulations have limited their use. Padimate O is the most potent FDA-approved UVB absorber. The decline in PABA use along with the demand for higher-SPF products led to the incorporation of multiple active ingredients in a single product to achieve the desired SPF.
Q50.2 The cinnamates largely replaced PABA derivatives as the next most potent UVB absorbers. Octinoxate (octyl methoxycinnamate, OMC) is the most frequently used sunscreen ingredient. As shown in Fig. 50.2, which illustrates absorbance curves on a logarithmic scale, OMC is an order of magnitude less potent than padimate O.
Octyl salicylate is used to augment the UVB protection in a sunscreen. Salicylates are weak UVB absorbers and are generally used in combination with other UV sunscreens. Other salicylates need to be used in higher concentrations.
Most chemical sunscreen ingredients are oils soluble in the oil phase of emulsion systems, accounting in part for the heavy, greasy esthetic properties of many of these products. Phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid is water soluble and used in products formulated to feel lighter and less oily, such as daily-use cosmetic moisturizers.
Review article
The transdermal spray technology incorporates 17β-oestradiol, octisalate and alcohol into a unique drug delivery system [9]. Upon application to the underside of the forearm, 17β-oestradiol and octisalate form a reservoir depot underneath the skin [9]. Octisalate facilitates the slow diffusion of 17β-oestradiol through the skin layers into the dermis and then releases oestradiol into the microcirculation at a steady rate over 24 h before it declines [17].
The oestradiol transdermal spray is packaged in a metered dose pump and requires a daily application [9]. Dosing of one, two or three sprays is selected by the user to control symptoms. When pressed against the skin the applicator device controls the distance, angle and area of application, reducing the risk of variability in application technique [9]. Each metered dose pump can deliver up to 56 sprays of precisely 90 mcL which contains 1.53 mg of 17β-oestradiol [9].
There are advantages and disadvantages to using the transdermal 17β-oestradiol spray. Its design appears to have addressed some of the potential drawbacks to using gels. It dries completely in a median of 67 s allowing women to dress quickly after application [17]. In addition, washing of the application site is permissible 30 min after dosing [9]. The spray contains bioidentical 17β-oestradiol and the applicator device is touchless minimising the risk of transfer to other people. This formulation therefore has high acceptability. Its drawbacks, however, are that it is not readily available across all formularies and experience is still limited where is has only recently become available.
Practice points
The transdermal spray is a daily application.
Dries completely in a median of 67 s
Washing is permissible 30 min after dosing.
Research agenda
The accuracy of serological tests for 17β-oestradiol when using the transdermal spray is not known and the influence of the octisalate depot on serological testing should be investigated.
Review article
17β-oestradiol is the most potent oestrogen produced naturally by the body. When administered exogenously, it has poor bioavailability and is subject to rapid metabolism. It therefore needs to be esterified or micronised to become bioavailable to any significant extent. Oestradiol valerate refers to the addition of valeric acid as an ester modification. Oestradiol hemihydrate refers to microcrystalline oestradiol that contains two oestradiol molecules for every one water molecule [1]. Oestradiol hemihydrate and oestradiol valerate are considered dose equivalent with comparable pharmacokinetics [2].
Circulatory levels of 17β-oestradiol remain elevated for a longer period of time compared to other sex steroids [1]. This is due to the unique metabolism of oral 17β-oestradiol; after ingestion it is rapidly and extensively metabolised in the liver and gut to estrone and inactive estrone conjugates. These metabolites then enter the circulation in high concentrations and serve as a hormonally inert reservoir from which 17β-oestradiol is continuously reproduced after reconversion [1].
There are advantages and disadvantages to the oral route of oestradiol administration. Its use is practical, convenient, rapidly reversible and avoids skin barriers and irritation. However, the extensive gut and first pass liver metabolism of 17β-oestradiol means that higher doses are needed to achieve therapeutic tissue levels compared to the parental route and consequently supraphysiological levels of 17β-oestradiol entering the hepatic circulation can stimulate liver proteins. When using oral 17β-oestradiol serological testing for 17β-oestradiol levels are unreliable because estrone is the major circulatory metabolite.
CEE are mixtures isolated from the urine of pregnant mares. They contain more than 10 estrogenic substances of which a third are not present in the human body [3]. They also contain up to 200 other steroidal substances including corticoids. From a clinical perspective CEE is no longer commonly prescribed in the UK although it is still widely used in other parts of the world Tables 1–7.
Table 1. Oral preparations.
| Proprietary Name | Oestradiol | Strength | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bedol | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 2 mg | Once daily |
| Elleste Solo | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 1 or 2 mg | Once daily |
| Progynova | 17β-oestradiol valerate | 1 or 2 mg | Once daily |
| Zumenon | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 1 or 2 mg | Once daily |
| Premarin | Conjugated equine estrogens | 300 μg, 625 μg or 1.25 mg | Once daily |
Table 2. Oestradiol patches.
| Name | Patch | Oestradiol | Strength (μg)/ 24hrs | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estraderm MX | Matrix | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 25, 50, 75, 100 | Twice weekly |
| FemSeven | Matrix | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 50, 75, 100 | Once weekly |
| Estradot | Matrix | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 25, 50, 37.5, 75, 100 | Twice weekly |
| Evorel | Matrix | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 25, 50, 75, 100 | Twice weekly |
| Progynova TS | Matrix | 17β-oestradiol hemihydrate | 50, 100 | Once weekly |
Table 3. Non-patch transdermal preparations.
| Name | Oestradiol | Dose |
|---|---|---|
| Oestrogel pump pack 750 μg/actuation | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 1–4 pumps daily. 1 × metered pump contains 0.75 mg of 17β-oestradiol. |
| Sandrena gel | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 0.5 mg or 1 mg of 17β-oestradiol per single dose sachet. |
| Lenzetto spray 1.53 mg/spray | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 1–3 sprays daily to underside of the forearm |
| Oestradiol implant. Available from special order manufacturer. | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 25 mg and 50 mg |
Table 4. Vaginal oestrogen preparations.
| Name | Form | Oestradiol | Dose | Regime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estring | Ring | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 7.5 μg/24 h | One ring used for 90 days |
| Vagifem | Pessary | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 10 μg/pessary | Daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly |
| Vagirux | Pessary | Oestradiol hemihydrate | 10 μg/pessary | Daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly |
| Blissel | Gel | Estriol | 50 μg/applicator | Daily for 3 weeks then twice weekly |
| Estriol cream 0.01% (Gynest) | Cream | Estriol | 500 μg/applicator | Daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly |
| Estriol cream 0.1% (Ovestin) | Cream | Estriol | 500 μg/applicator | Daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly |
| Imvaggis | Pessary | Estriol | 30 μg/pessary | Daily for 3 weeks then twice weekly |
Table 5. Effects of oestrogen preparations on clotting factors.
| Empty Cell | Oral oestradiol | Transdermal oestradiol |
|---|---|---|
| Antithrombin III | ↓ | Neutral |
| Fibrinogen | ↓ | ↓ |
| Factor VII activity | Neutral | ↓ |
| Von Willebrand Factor | ↑ | Neutral or ↓ |
| Prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 | ↑ | Neutral or ↓ |
Table 6. Effects of oestrogen preparations on lipids.
| Empty Cell | Oral oestrogen | Transdermal oestrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol | ↓ | ↓ |
| HDL-C | ↑ | ↑ |
| LDL-C | ↓ | ↓ |
| Triglycerides | ↑ | Neutral or ↓ |
Tablet 7. Effects of oestrogen preparations on hepatic markers.
| Empty Cell | Oral | Transdermal |
|---|---|---|
| Angiotensinogen | ↑ | Neutral |
| CRP | ↑ | Neutral or ↓ |
| TBG | ↑ | Neutral |
| SHBG | ↑ | Neutral |
| CBG | ↑ | Neutral |
Practice points
Daily oral preparations represent a practical and convenient option that avoid skin barriers.
All undergo extensive gut and hepatic metabolism.
Preparations containing 17β-oestradiol are generally preferred because these contain a bioidentical hormone.
Serological tests for 17β-oestradiol are not recommended with oral preparations because the main circulatory metabolite is estrone.
17β-oestradiol is a small lipophilic molecule and this characteristic has facilitated the development of transdermal delivery systems [4–7]. The first transdermal delivery system developed was the reservoir patch. This patch contained an oestradiol reservoir, an alcohol containing membrane and a backing layer. The alcohol containing membrane determined the rate of delivery of 17β-oestradiol into the skin [4,8]. This patch type was limited by a high frequency of skin reactions thought to be due the alcohol solvent [4,9]. Although these were available in different dosages, these patches could not be cut to adjust dosing.
The matrix patch was subsequently developed containing a more advanced technology where 17β-oestradiol is dispersed directly into a monolayered adhesive matrix without the need for a rate controlling membrane [4]. These patches are associated with fewer skin reactions because they do not contain alcohol solvent [8]. For each formula of matrix patch, the release rate of 17β-oestradiol is proportional to the surface area and therefore cutting the matrix patch provides a way of predictably reducing the dose [10].
Patches deliver a dose between 25 μg and 100 μg per day. However, the actual delivery rate may be different and there has been a wide range of 17β-oestradiol serum levels measured in women treated with the same patch [1,11]. When using a reservoir patch, serum 17β-oestradiol levels peak at 30 h and decrease thereafter declining markedly on day 3 due to low alcohol levels in the reservoir [1,12,13]. For this reason, reservoir patches much be changed every 3.5 days. In contrast, when using a matrix patch, serum 17β-oestradiol levels peak at 12 h and the diffusion rate of 17β-oestradiol then remains relatively constant over the next 7 days. Matrix patches are therefore effective for 7 days despite manufacturers recommending a patch change twice weekly [1]. Within 24 h after removal of patches, oestradiol levels return to baseline [1].
There are advantages and disadvantages to transdermal 17β-oestradiol patches. These patches contain bioidentical 17β-oestradiol and a wide range of dosing options are available. The matrix patches can be cut to make small dose adjustments possible [4]. Matrix patches can be given once weekly or twice weekly which for some individuals feels more pragmatic and the smallest patch Estradot is very discrete measuring 5 cm2 [10]. Although skin reactions are less common with matrix patches, they do still develop and can limit compliance [4,9]. Additionally, up to 10% of patches can fall off [8,9]. Patches can also become dirty or leave a sticky residue and the release rate of some patches may also be affected by temperature [9].
Practice points
Matrix patches can be cut to predictably reduce the dose.
Once and twice weekly preparations are available.
Patches might be considered cosmetically unappealing or limited by skin reactions or detachment issues.
The application of gel products that contain an alcoholic base to solvate the skin results in rapid penetration of 17β-oestradiol into the stratum corneum [1,9]. There are two gel preparations available [1]. One preparation is a pump dispensing pack whereby one metred dose (1.25 g) supplies 0.75 mg 17β-oestradiol. The daily application of this gel leads to peak 17β-oestradiol levels within 3–5 days and after discontinuation of treatment 17β-oestradiol levels return to pre-treatment levels by 6 days [1]. The other gel preparation is available as single dose sachets that delivers either 0.5 mg or 1 mg 17β-oestradiol respectively. Daily application of this gel leads to peak 17β-oestradiol levels within 6 h and thereafter declines slowly [14]. The two gel formulations are considered bioequivalent [15].
There are advantages and disadvantages to using transdermal 17β-oestradiol gels. Gels contain bioidentical 17β-oestradiol and the pump dispensing system is user friendly and pragmatic for dose adjustments [4]. Daily dosing regimens are preferable for some users and once the gel has been absorbed it is undetectable. However, gels must be allowed to dry before applying clothing which can take 2–5 min [9]. In addition, the skin site should be kept dry after any gel application meaning showering washing or swimming should be undertaken prior to use [9]. Site washing 1 h after gel application results in a 22% mean decrease in average 24-hour serum 17β-oestradiol concentrations [16]. Lastly, unlike with other preparations, the user comes into direct contact with active 17β-oestradiol meaning that there is risk of 17β-oestradiol transfer to other persons [9].
Practice points
The two gel preparations of 17β-oestradiol are considered bioequivalent.
Gel preparations takes 2–5 min to dry.
Skin should be kept dry after application ideally for 2 h.
Care should be taken to avoid transferring the gel to others.
Application is daily.
The transdermal spray technology incorporates 17β-oestradiol, octisalate and alcohol into a unique drug delivery system [9]. Upon application to the underside of the forearm, 17β-oestradiol and octisalate form a reservoir depot underneath the skin [9]. Octisalate facilitates the slow diffusion of 17β-oestradiol through the skin layers into the dermis and then releases oestradiol into the microcirculation at a steady rate over 24 h before it declines [17].
The oestradiol transdermal spray is packaged in a metered dose pump and requires a daily application [9]. Dosing of one, two or three sprays is selected by the user to control symptoms. When pressed against the skin the applicator device controls the distance, angle and area of application, reducing the risk of variability in application technique [9]. Each metered dose pump can deliver up to 56 sprays of precisely 90 mcL which contains 1.53 mg of 17β-oestradiol [9].
There are advantages and disadvantages to using the transdermal 17β-oestradiol spray. Its design appears to have addressed some of the potential drawbacks to using gels. It dries completely in a median of 67 s allowing women to dress quickly after application [17]. In addition, washing of the application site is permissible 30 min after dosing [9]. The spray contains bioidentical 17β-oestradiol and the applicator device is touchless minimising the risk of transfer to other people. This formulation therefore has high acceptability. Its drawbacks, however, are that it is not readily available across all formularies and experience is still limited where is has only recently become available.
Practice points
The transdermal spray is a daily application.
Dries completely in a median of 67 s
Washing is permissible 30 min after dosing.
Research agenda
The accuracy of serological tests for 17β-oestradiol when using the transdermal spray is not known and the influence of the octisalate depot on serological testing should be investigated.
Standard implant preparations contain 25 mg or 50 mg of 17β-oestradiol pellets which are replaced every 6 months and titrated according to circulating oestradiol levels and symptom response. Implants are inserted into the subcutaneous tissue in the lower abdomen, lower back or buttocks and represent a depot that releases 17β-oestradiol at an even and slow rate [1]. An implant that contains 25 mg of 17β-oestradiol pellets causes an oestradiol level of 330 pmol/L on average for 6 months [1,18].
There are advantages and disadvantages to 17β-oestradiol implants. They avoid first pass hepatic metabolism and barriers to skin permeation. They guarantee compliance and sustained higher levels of 17β-oestradiol. Testosterone implants can also be given concurrently. However, they are more invasive and for this reason often reserved for women with symptoms resistant to standard HRT regimens. There has also been a lack of availability in recent years making access difficult. Once an implant is inserted there is no control over blood levels and it cannot be removed even if it is no longer advisable for example after a new diagnosis of breast cancer or a venous thrombolembolism. Each implant can continue to produxce oestradiol for several years after insertion so accumulation of oestradiol can be a problem, thus regular monitoring of oestradiol levels is advisable. Tachyphylaxis is also a recognised complication that describes the return of menopausal symptoms despite the accumulation of high 17β-oestradiol concentrations [19]. If oestradiol levels show signs of escalating, reimplantation should be avoided until they have returned to a more acceptable level.
Practice points
Implant preparations can overcome skin barriers, first pass metabolism and guarantee compliance.
They are usually reserved for women with symptoms resistant to standard oestrogen regimens.
Serological 17β-oestradiol monitoring is required to prevent accumulation and tachyphylaxis.
Usually replaced every 6 months and can be co-administered with testosterone.
Practice points
There is a paucity of data on implant safety. Establishment of a national implant database has been proposed by the British Menopause Society [19].
Ethinyloestradiol is an oral oestrogen contained in combined oral contraceptives. It cannot be split to become 17β-oestradiol due to the introduction of an ethinyl group at C17α in the molecule [1]. It is considered more active than 17β-oestradiol and has more pronounced hepatic effects [20]. Ethinyloestradiol 10 μg is likely to offer an equivalent dose of oestrogen replacement to 1–2 mg of 17β-oestradiol [21]. For younger women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) its use might feel more aligned to their peers, although 17β-oestradiol may be more beneficial in improving cardiovascular and bone health [21].
Compounded oestrogen treatments are not recommended and present safety concerns [22]. They may combine multiple types of oestrogen together such as oestradiol, estrone and estriol and are produced on the basis of salivary hormone testing which is considered unreliable [22].
Practice points
Ethinyloestradiol can be used as oestrogen replacement in younger women but may provide less benefit towards cardiovascular and bone health compared to 17β-oestradiol.
Compounded oestrogen treatments are not recommended.
Vaginal oestrogen is the treatment of choice for women with symptoms of urogenital atrophy or genitourinary syndrome of the menopause. These preparations do not treat systemic symptoms of the menopause due to their minimal absorption and a progestogen is not required [22]. Preparations containing either 17β-oestradiol or estriol are available in a gel, cream, pessary or ring form.
Vaginal pessaries containing 17β-oestradiol require twice weekly application after 2 weeks of daily use [23]. Each pessary contains 10 μg 17β-oestradiol and with their use serum 17β-oestradiol levels range from 3 pg/mL to 11 pg/mL (11 pmol/L to 40 pmol/L, respectively) [23]. The low-dose vaginal ring provides continuous 17β-oestradiol release at a dose of 7.5 μg daily for 3 months. With its use, serum 17β-oestradiol levels range from 5 pg/mL to 10 pg/mL (18 pmol/L to 36 pmol/L, respectively) [23]. Serum 17β-oestradiol levels reported with use of these low-dose vaginal preparations remain within the normal postmenopausal range [23].
Two preparations of estriol cream are available: estriol 0.1% and estriol 0.01% and both deliver an identical amount of estriol per application which is 500 μg. This is because the two preparations differ tenfold in their volume. Ultra-low-dose estriol preparations include a 30 μg pessary and a 50 μg/g estriol gel and these display similar efficacy to conventional 500 μg preparations [24]. Ultra-low doses of estriol demonstrate negligible increases in serum estriol levels after 3 weeks of daily use [25].
Different vaginal preparations confer advantages and disadvantages, although all treatments are comparable in terms of efficacy [26]. Oestrogen creams or gels may offer a soothing effect, possibly because of the emollient nature [23]. They can also be digitally applied to skin on the vulva or vestibule as a targeted treatment [23]. However, some women consider the creams messy and there have been reports of skin sensitivities to the vehicles used in these products [23]. Moreover, the user has responsibility for preparing the dose and vaginal pessaries may be preferable if careful dosing is required [23]. Pessaries represent a convenient and practical option that for many is considered less messy although vaginal discharge can still occur. The vaginal ring requires replacement only 4 times per year making it a long-acting and convenient option particularly for those with cognitive decline. It can remain in place during intercourse or removed if preferred [23]. The packaging between preparations varies which can be important for some. For example Imvaggis is plastic free.
Practice points
Vaginal preparations contain either 17β-oestradiol or estriol.
Preparations include pessaries, gels, creams or a ring.
Low-dose preparations are associated with minimal systemic absorption and are considered safe.
All types of systemic oestrogen have similar efficacy with no significant differences between oral and transdermal preparations [1,3,27]. The two routes differ however in terms of their safety profiles. Oral oestrogen impacts on thrombotic mechanisms, lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, and hepatic proteins due to its extensive first pass metabolism.
The vast majority of studies that have looked at cardiovascular and breast cancer outcomes have used oral preparations.
The link between oral oestrogen and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well established. Risk is increased 2–4-fold and is greatest in the first year after initiation [28]. Oral oestrogen is known to induce a prothrombotic milieu through various effects on hepatic clotting factors [8,9,29–33]. In contrast, transdermal oestrogen has little or no effect on coagulation factors and large observational studies demonstrate that this route is unlikely to alter propensity towards VTE [9,31–34]. Furthermore, data analysis from the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk (ESTHER) case control study concluded that while oral oestrogen increased the risk of VTE 25-fold in women who carry the Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation, transdermal oestrogen had no impact on VTE risk above and beyond risk already associated with the mutation ( [9,35]. A meta-analysis of observational studies described similar findings [31]. It must be emphasised that these conclusions are based on observational data and therefore remain tentative pending prospective trials [8].
Practice points
Women at increased risk of VTE should be prescribed transdermal oestrogen first line.
Research agenda
Trials are needed that look at transdermal oestrogen and VTE risk in the setting of confirmed thrombophilia.
Oral and transdermal oestrogens have been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels along with total cholesterol levels; however, transdermal preparations appear to do this to a lesser extent [8,9,36]. The significant hepatic stimulation with oral oestrogen however increases production of triglycerides whereas transdermal oestrogen has a neutral or lowering effect on triglycerides [8,9,37].
Practice points
Oral preparations reduce total cholesterol levels to a greater extent compared with transdermal preparations.
Oral oestrogen is associated with a small increased risk of thrombotic stroke which appears to be dose dependent [38]. In contrast evidence from large observational studies suggest that transdermal oestrogen is unlikely to increase the risk of ischaemic stroke above a woman’s own baseline risk [21]. It should be noted that the route of oestrogen administration and any effects on plaque rupture through vasodilatory or antioxidative mechanisms has not been well studied.
Practice points
Oral oestrogen is associated with a small increased risk of stroke and should ideally be avoided in women with other risk factors.
Research agenda
The influence of route on administration and plaque rupture should be investigated.
Increased circulatory levels of angiotensinogen, c-reactive protein, serum amyloid A as well as other hormone binding proteins can occur following oral oestrogen ingestion [8]. Angiotensinogen has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension and CRP is an acute phase protein recognised as a marker for vascular inflammation [9].
Oral oestrogen can affect thyroid function by raised circulatory thyroid-binding globulin (TBG) levels thereby increasing the bound fraction of thyroxine and decreasing free thyroxine levels [39]. Similarly oral oestrogen raises SHBG levels increasing the bound fraction of testosterone reducing circulatory free testosterone levels [9] which can negatively affect sexual function or libido [22].
Any potential clinical effects described above with regards to hepatic protein stimulation have not been well studied and therefore any suggested risks remain theoretical only.
Practice points
Oral oestrogen may increase the thyroid dosage requirement for women being treated for hypothyroidism or alter the pituitary thyroid axis in euthyroid women.
Oral oestrogen can reduce circulating free testosterone levels.
Risk of gallstones, cholecystitis, and cholecystectomy is increased with oestrogen preparations and observational studies report lower risk with transdermal preparations compared with oral [22]. Although the first pass hepatic effect of oral oestrogen will likely increase the risk of gallbladder disease, even with the transdermal route increased risk is not completely abolished [40]. Oestrogens increase biliary cholesterol secretion and saturation, promote precipitation of cholesterol in the bile, and reduce gallbladder motility with increased bile crystallisation [22,41,42].
Practice points
Oestrogen preparations increase risk of gallbladder pathology. Risk is lower with transdermal preparations.
One challenge associated with transdermal oestrogen can be poor skin permeability. Several permeation enhancers exist in formulations to enhance penetration of 17β-oestradiol through the skin however, where absorption remains a barrier, the efficacy of the transdermal route will be reduced. There may be racial differences affecting skin permeability [43]. Similarly, the efficacy of the oral route can be reduced by gastrointestinal barriers including bowel resections and conditions associated with malabsorption such as coeliac disease or inflammatory bowel disease.
Patches may cause local skin reactions including erythema, itching, spots, pruritis, eczema, scaling, blisters and burning sensations. These reactions are frequently given as the reason for discontinuation and itching is often cited as the most disruptive symptom. Skin reactions are usually caused by an irritative effect of the patch adhesive itself rather than the active hormone [44]. It can be helpful to rotate or change the site of application when skin irritation occurs. Gels and the transdermal spray tend to be associated with fewer skin reactions than patches [44]. Transdermal patches made of 17β-oestradiol have occasionally been reported as a cause of allergic sensitisation towards the hormone [44,45].
Practice points
Absorption with the transdermal route can be limited by skin permeability.
Absorption with the oral route can be limited by gastrointestinal barriers.
Skin reactions can limit acceptability of transdermal preparations.
A Cochrane meta-analysis that included 30 randomised controlled trials concluded that all vaginal oestrogen treatments were comparable in terms of efficacy and adverse events [26]. Vaginal oestrogen should be considered a separate treatment modality to HRT because it is not significantly absorbed into the systemic circulation and systemic effects are minimal. Data from the large observational Women’s Health Initiative study showed no increase in cancer or cardiovascular risk with vaginal oestrogen preparations [46]. Therefore, the choice of the form of administration is determined by the patient’s preference.
Side effects with vaginal oestrogen use include discharge, skin irritation, odour and a greater frequency of mycotic infections [23,47]. Adverse events associated with vaginal oestrogen can occur including vaginal bleeding, breast pain and nausea [23]. These symptoms are dose related and suggests the dose administered has resulted in significant systemic absorption [23]. This is more likely to occur at treatment initiation when absorption into the systemic circulation is higher because the vaginal epithelium is at its thinnest [48]. After 2–4 weeks of treatment the vaginal epithelium thickens and absorption is minimal [48]. If side effects persist a lower dose preparation should be considered. Different adverse event profiles might reflect variations in product dose and formulation [23].
Practice points
All vaginal preparations are comparable in terms of efficacy and are not associated with long-term health risks.
Choice is determined by patient preference.
Side effects can occur and are more common at treatment initiation.
Our role as clinicians is to help women make evidence based, unbiased and informed choices. This enables patient centred care and shared decision making. A woman’s preference regarding her route of oestrogen administration should be explored taking into consideration the pros and cons of each for her (see Table 8). Any risk of harm or uncertainties should be communicated. Transdermal preparations have a low risk profile in general and should be recommended as the first-choice route in women with risk factors for stroke, VTE, hyperlipidaemia, cholelithiasis, liver or gastrointestinal disease. Oral preparations can be used where no specific risks are identified.
Table 8. Risks and Benefits of oral and transdermal routes.
| Empty Cell | Oral | Transdermal |
|---|---|---|
| PRACTICALITY | ||
| Convenient, easy, transportable. | Daily, twice weekly and once weekly preparations available. | |
| Daily preparations only. | Patches can detach or leave a residue. Gels can be transferred to other persons, can be messy and skin should be kept dry after application for 1–2 h[4,9]. | |
| VISIBILITY | ||
| Non visible. | Gel and spray are non-visible. | |
| Patches are visible. | ||
| SKIN | ||
| No risk of skin reactions. | ||
| Skin reactions can occur. | ||
| ABSORPTION | ||
| Absorption not limited by skin permeability. | Absorption not limited by gastrointestinal barriers. | |
| Absorption can be limited by gastrointestinal barriers. | Absorption can be limited by skin permeability and poor patch adhesion. | |
| LIPID PROFILE | ||
| Lowers total cholesterol levels more than transdermal preparations. | Lowers total cholesterol and triglycerides levels. | |
| Elevates triglyceride levels. | ||
| RISK | ||
| Studies suggest no increased risk of VTE or stroke above baseline risk and no aberrations in hepatic binding proteins. | ||
| Risk of stroke and VTE increased. Increased risk of cholelithiasis. Can increase SHBG, TBG and CBG. | Increased risk of cholelithiasis although less than with oral preparations. | |
| INTERACTIONS | ||
| Unlikely to interact with other medications. | ||
| Has the potential to interact with other medications. | ||
| OTHER | ||
| For younger women the oral route can feel more aligned to their peers. | Provides more consistent serum levels by avoiding peaks and troughs inherent to oral oestrogen[9]. This may benefit symptoms caused by hormone fluctuations such as headaches. | |
There is not an arbitrary limit placed on age or duration of use for oestrogen treatments [49]. The decision to continue taking or initiate oestrogen treatment should be considered in the context of the overall benefits obtained [49]. Any initiation of oestrogen however in older women requires careful consideration of the individual benefits and risks. The safety profile of oestrogen replacement is most favourable when it is initiated by women aged younger than 60 years or within 10 years of menopause onset [50].
Clinicians should enquire about dietary restrictions or allergies. Some oestrogen preparations contain animal or unknown derived ingredients and a number of religions have dietary guidelines [51]. There is racial and cultural disparity in acceptance of both systemic and local hormone therapies which clinicians should be aware of [52].
For women with a past history of breast cancer or a hormone sensitive malignancy non hormonal options should be recommended first. Systemic oestrogen replacement in this setting should be used on an exceptional basis and only after discussion with the wider multidisciplinary team [53]. Low-dose vaginal oestrogen preparations can be considered, where non hormonal options have not helped, after an informed decision-making process. Estriol containing preparations might be preferable, although this has not been confirmed. Estriol has a low affinity for the ERα, which is dominant in the endometrium and glandular breast tissue, it has a short circulatory half-life and it cannot be converted back to other oestrogen precursors [54,55]. Compared to 17β-oestradiol, estriol is a less potent hormone in most tissues except the vaginal epithelium where it has a proliferative effect via ERβ ( [54].
Practice points
With regards to oestrogen treatments there is not a one size fits all.
A clinician’s role is to help women make evidence-based, unbiased and informed choices.
Age, dietary restrictions, allergies, and cultural differences all affect choice.
Transdermal preparations have a low risk profile in general.
Research agenda
Further research is needed to examine oestrogen treatments and risk of breast cancer recurrence.
Further research is needed to investigate the risks of oestrogen initiation in older women.
Currently there is no evidence regarding the optimal monitoring strategy. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends arranging a three-month review if HRT has been started or changed and then annually thereafter unless there are clinical indications for an earlier review [56]. The therapeutic aim should be to use the most appropriate, lowest and effective dose of systemic oestrogen to enable treatment goals [22].
There is no recommended circulatory level of 17β-oestradiol and response to treatment with HRT should be based on symptom control [57]. Checking circulatory 17β-oestradiol levels is prone to error as it is influenced by the timing of dosing, the type of assay and the route of administration [57]. Blood tests should therefore not be routinely performed but can be considered in certain situations, such as to confirm adequate absorption if symptoms are not improving or as part of monitoring on implant therapy. They can also be considered for women with POI who have minimal symptoms despite being oestrogen deficient. For these individuals the recommendation is to achieve mean physiological levels of 17β-oestradiol as found in the serum of women with normal menstrual cycles (180–370 pmol/L) [58].
Maintaining compliance with a HRT regime is an ongoing challenge and the primary reason for discontinuation is side effects Progestogen side effects are more common, although side effects from oestrogen can occur too [22] Table 9.
Table 9. Side effects from oestrogen.
| Nausea |
|---|
| Bloating |
| Weight gain |
| Fluid retention |
| Bleeding problems |
| Mood changes |
| Headaches |
Oestrogen’s side effects are usually dose-related and lowering the 17β-oestradiol dose will often alleviate the problem. Sometimes just cutting a small corner off a matrix patch can help. There are considerable individual differences in the metabolism and absorption of 17β-oestradiol between preparations [1] and switching to another preparation or route might improve tolerability.
Practice points
Lowering the oestrogen dose or changing the preparation can reduce side effects.
Routine serological 17β-oestradiol testing is not recommended except in specific circumstances such as poor symptom response or when using implants.
Serological 17β-oestradiol levels can be considered in women with POI and minimal symptoms.
All types of systemic oestrogen preparations have similar efficacy. Choice of preparation is therefore depicted by patient acceptability and any health risks. Age, dietary restrictions, allergies, cultural differences and religions will all affect perspective on acceptability. Transdermal preparations have a low risk profile in general although skin reactions, absorption issues and patient acceptability can be barriers to this route. For women with symptoms resistant to standard regimens implants may be a good option. Vaginal oestrogen preparations are generally considered safe either on their own or in conjunction with systemic oestrogens and are all comparable in efficacy. There is no one size fits all with any oestrogen preparation and our role as clinicians is to communicate the pros and cons of each type and guide women to make evidence based, unbiased and informed choices.
Review article
Nestorone (16-methylene-17α-acetoxy-19-norpregn-4-ene-3,20-dione) is a 19-norprogesterone derivative with a high progestational activity which may be attributed to the absence of the 19-methyl radical and the addition of the 16-methylene substitute, which promotes binding to and transactivation of the PR [5,30]. Other factors which contribute to its high specificity include its lack of binding to the AR [31,32] with no binding to SHBG [29]. NES binds to GR but does not exert glucocorticoid activity in in vivo assays at the doses required for its contraceptive efficacy [30]. NES is inactive orally but highly potent when administered parenterally [33,34].
NES has been shown to exert a high contraceptive activity when administered via different nonoral delivery routes, such as vaginal rings, implants and transdermal systems. As NES has the highest antiovulatory action among existing progestins, a very low dose could be used and delivered from non oral delivery systems.
A vaginal ring containing NES/EE releasing low doses of NES (150 mcg) and EE (15 mcg) is undergoing development as a contraceptive at the Population Council [35,36]. At present, the ring is in its final stages of development. Second-generation vaginal rings, which include a design delivering NES with E2, the natural estrogen, instead of EE, are in the early developmental stage.
The contraceptive potential of NES delivered via the transdermal route has also been studied. The first study testing NES transdermal gel found it to be effective in suppressing ovulation in a high percentage of women [37]. In a 3-month multicenter study carried out among 150 cycling women, NES gel was applied transdermally in three different doses of 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 mg. The level of ovulation suppression reached 53%, 64% and 83% in the three dose groups, respectively [37,38]. Based on these promising results, higher doses of NES were combined with low doses of E2, and preliminary results indicate a high antiovulatory efficacy.
Similarly, the Metered Dose Transdermal System (MDTS), which is in the initial stages of development, is a fast drying liquid formulation used in a nonocclusive spray containing NES dosed via a precisely engineered system delivering the drug to the skin surface [39]. NES is combined with a safe skin penetration enhancer — octisalate, which forms a reservoir within the skin wherein the drug is slowly absorbed into the circulation over a duration of several hours. A pharmacokinetic trial of this new transdermal delivery system has demonstrated the feasibility of achieving serum levels of NES sufficient to block ovulation and hence provide effective contraception. A spray formulation incorporating both NES and an estrogen, either E2 or EE, is undergoing clinical trials.
NES has been tested in the form of a single implant releasing 100 mcg of NES per day administered to lactating women in a 2-year study [40]. No pregnancies were reported in 2195 women-months of exposure, and implant users demonstrated significantly less irregular bleeding compared to copper-T IUD users. This progestin also has the advantage of being safe for infants as NES is not active orally and is quickly destroyed in the gastrointestinal tract. Massai et al. [40] followed the growth of infants who were breastfed by mothers receiving an implant of NES and found no difference in infant growth and development as compared with those who were breastfed by mothers using the IUD.
Review article
Twenty-eight, 26, and 21 active ingredients are approved for UVA and UVB sunscreens in Europe, Australia, and Canada, respectively [26]. A list of 28 active ingredients approved in the European Union is shown in Box 1. In the United States, there are 16 filters included in the FDA sunscreen monograph (Table 2). Some of the permitted filters are not broad UVA filters; some are not photostable or are difficult to incorporate into formulations. All permitted UV filters can be used with any other permitted UV filters except avobenzone. Current FDA rules do not allow formulators to combine avobenzone with inorganic sunscreen [26]. Avobenzone is allowed to be used only with cinoxate, dioxybenzone, octinoxate, octisalate, homosalate, oxybenzone, octocrylene, sulisobenzone, and trolamine salicylate. Microfine oxides are allowed in the United States, Europe, and Australia [43]. Because of their safety, they are probably the most common choice for children's and high SPF products.
Benzophenone-4 (sulisobenzone)
3-Benzylidene camphor
Benzylidene camphor sulfonic acid
BEMT (bemotrizinol [Tinosorb S])
Bisymidazylate
Butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (avobenzone [Parsol 1789])
Camphor benzalkonium methosulfate
DHHB
DBT
Dimethicodiethylbenzal malonate
DTS (silatriazole [Mexoryl XL])
Ethoxylated ethyl 4-aminobenzoic acid (PEG-25 PABA)
Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (octyl methoxycinnamate and octinoxate)
2-Ethylhexyl p-dimethyl amino benzoate (octyl dimethyl PABA)
Ethylhexyl salicylate (octyl salicylate; Octisalate)
Homomenthyl salicylate (homosalate)
IMC (Amiloxate)
MBC (enzacamene)
MBBT (bisoctrizole [Tinosorb M])
Octocrylene
Octyl triazone
Oxybenzone
PABA
Phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid (ensulizole)
Polyacrylamidomethyl benzylidene camphor
TDSA (ecamsule [Mexoryl SX])
TiO2
ZnO
Table 2. Sixteen sunscreens approved in the United States
| Approved sunscreens | Max concentration (%) |
|---|---|
| PABA | 15 |
| Avobenzone | 3 |
| Cinoxate | 3 |
| Dioxybenzone | 3 |
| Ensulizole | 4 |
| Homosalate | 15 |
| Meradimate (menthyl anthranilate) | 5 |
| Octinoxate | 7.5 |
| Octisalate | 5 |
| Octocrylene | 10 |
| Octyl dimethyl PABA | 8 |
| Oxybenzone | 6 |
| Salisobenzone | 10 |
| TiO2 | 25 |
| Trolamine salicylate | 12 |
| ZnO | 25 |
Chapter
Sunscreens have been traditionally divided into chemical absorbers and physical blockers, based on their mechanism of action. Chemical sunscreens are generally aromatic compounds conjugated with a carbonyl group.4 These chemicals absorb high-intensity UV rays, producing excitation to a higher-energy state. With return to the ground state, the result is conversion of the absorbed energy into longer, lower-energy wavelengths (such as infrared radiation, hence heat). Physical blockers reflect or scatter UVR. Microsized forms of physical blockers, also designated as inorganic particulates, also function in part by absorption. There are 55 UV filters approved for sunscreen products globally, but only 16 approved in the United States.
The most commonly used active sunscreen ingredients are listed in Table 50.3 by their US Adopted Name (USAN). Allowable ingredients are listed in the FDA monograph, as are appropriate concentrations for the various UV filters discussed in this chapter. Sunscreen nomenclature can be quite confusing. They may also be referred to by their chemical International Cosmetic Ingredient (INCI) name or by their trade name. Representative sunscreen chemical structures are shown in Fig. 50.1.
Sunscreen ingredients can also be classified by which portion of the UV spectrum they effectively absorb, as well as their role in a particular formulation with a combination of ingredients. The absorption spectrum of the most commonly used sunscreens is shown in Fig. 50.2. The most important sunscreen ingredients are discussed individually.
Homosalate is one of the most commonly used UVB filters in sunscreens in the US market. It belongs to the salicylate class and has a peak absorption of 306 nm. It is approved by the FDA for a maximum concentration of 15%. Along with other salicylates such as octisalate, it is a weak absorber and is often used in combination with other organic absorbers.
Octocrylene is another widely used UVB filter. This molecule has the unique role in stabilizing avobenzone, the only long-range organic UVA filter available in the United States. Without octocrylene, avobenzone is degraded by 50% upon 1 hour of UV exposure, rendering the sunscreen less effective. Octocrylene has a thick, oily texture, and a peak absorption at 303 nm (range 290–360 nm).
Q50.2 Para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) was one of the first chemical sunscreens to be widely available. However, its use in modern-day sunscreens has been limited for several reasons. This UVB filter required an alcoholic vehicle, it stained clothing, and it was associated with a number of adverse reactions, including subjective stinging and allergic contact dermatitis. Ester derivatives, mainly padimate O (octyl dimethyl PABA), became more popular with greater compatibility in a variety of cosmetic vehicles and a lower potential for staining or other adverse reactions. Despite being a potent UVB absorber, problems with PABA formulations have limited their use. Padimate O is the most potent FDA-approved UVB absorber. The decline in PABA use along with the demand for higher-SPF products led to the incorporation of multiple active ingredients in a single product to achieve the desired SPF.
Q50.2 The cinnamates largely replaced PABA derivatives as the next most potent UVB absorbers. Octinoxate (octyl methoxycinnamate, OMC) is the most frequently used sunscreen ingredient. As shown in Fig. 50.2, which illustrates absorbance curves on a logarithmic scale, OMC is an order of magnitude less potent than padimate O.
Octyl salicylate is used to augment the UVB protection in a sunscreen. Salicylates are weak UVB absorbers and are generally used in combination with other UV sunscreens. Other salicylates need to be used in higher concentrations.
Most chemical sunscreen ingredients are oils soluble in the oil phase of emulsion systems, accounting in part for the heavy, greasy esthetic properties of many of these products. Phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid is water soluble and used in products formulated to feel lighter and less oily, such as daily-use cosmetic moisturizers.
In the United States, there are only three UVA filters widely available and commonly used in sunscreen formulations. In the organic filter category, oxybenzone provides both UVB and short-range UVA protection. Avobenzone provides long-range UVA protection. In the inorganic category, zinc oxide provides UVA protection. Furthermore, the level and spectrum of UVA coverage depends on the particle size.
Q50.3 Although benzophenones are primarily UVB absorbers (as shown in Fig. 50.2), oxybenzone absorbs well through the UVA-2 spectrum. This sunscreen can be considered a broad-spectrum UVR absorber. Benzophenones significantly augment the UVB protection of a sunscreen product (while expanding into UVA coverage) when used in a given formulation. Oxybenzone demonstrates peak absorption at 288 and 325 nm. Other benzophenones include sulisobenzone and dioxybenzone.
Q50.3 Avobenzone provides superior protection through a large portion of the UVA spectrum (see Fig. 50.2), including the majority of the UVA-1 spectrum. Q50.4 Photostability is a problem with avobenzone, as is its potential to degrade other sunscreen ingredients in products including octinoxate.5 This photoinstability can be offset by combining avobenzone with octocrylene or with other nonsunscreen ingredients such as diethylhexyl 2,6 napthalate.6 Because of its unique property in stabilizing avobenzone, octocrylene is commonly used to enhance both UVB and UVA protection. Clinicians are again reminded of the limitations of sunscreen products and the need to counsel patients about total sun protection as discussed previously.
Also known as Mexoryl SX, this UVA filter has a broad absorption profile from 290 to 390 nm, with peak absorption at 345 nm. Because ecamsule is FDA approved through a New Drug Application, it can only be used in certain formulations.
Menthyl anthranilate is a weak UVB filter that absorbs mainly in the near UVA (UVA-2) portion of the spectrum. This sunscreen ingredient is less effective and is less widely used.
Despite popular belief that physical blockers only scatter UV light, both titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide work by absorbing and scattering UV light. Poor cosmetic acceptance limited the widespread use of TiO2 and zinc oxide until microsized (‘nano-sized’) forms became available in the early 1990s. Also known as inorganic particulate sunscreens, these metal oxides are reactive and poorly soluble without coating and chemical treatment. Current studies indicate that these nanoparticles do not show significant skin penetration.7
The ideal sunscreening agent would be chemically inert, safe, and absorb or reflect through the full UV spectrum. TiO2 meets these criteria, limited only by esthetics. By reducing the particle size of this chemical to a microsize or ultrafine grade and making it less visible on the skin surface, some of these advantages could be used. Q50.5 Changing the form of these particles results in their functioning by absorption and not simply blocking (reflecting and scattering) UVR, making TiO2 less effective in the UVA range than an opaque physical blocker. Even with this limitation, this ingredient can be classified as a broad-spectrum agent.
Despite advances in the technology, it is difficult to formulate products with TiO2 that do not whiten the skin secondary to pigment residue. Adding other pigments, such as iron oxide, that simulate flesh tones may partially camouflage this effect. The net effect might be that the user would be inclined to apply the product less heavily, effectively lowering the SPF. ‘Hybrid’ products using a combination of chemical UV absorbers with inorganic particulate sunscreens may represent a practical compromise.
Q50.5 Zinc oxide offers the same advantages and disadvantages previously described with TiO2. Protection against UVA-1 is superior for zinc oxide (340–380 nm) than for TiO2, thereby providing more full-spectrum protection.8
Q50.6 Both organic and inorganic particulate microsized sunscreens are not very effective in the short-wavelength visible range—the Soret band—necessary for optimal protection of patients with porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) or other porphyrias. Protective clothing and sun avoidance remain the mainstays of PCT UV exposure protective measures. Opaque physical blockers would be of some value for localized regions in these patients with PCT.
More sunscreen ingredients are available in Europe than in the United States. Several may soon become available via the TEA (material time and material extent application) approval process (Table 50.4). Providing both UVB and UVA protection, these absorbers also contribute to the photostability of formulations.
Review article
Salicylates are photostable agents with high substantivity; as a result, they are frequently incorporated into water-resistant products and combined with photolabile UV-A filters, such as avobenzone.24,31 Octisalate, homosalate, and trolamine salicylate are commonly found in sunscreens. Trolamine salicylate is also often used in hair products as a UV filter.33
Review article
Drospirenone (DRSP) is an anti-mineralocorticoid progestin derived from spirolactone [8–10]. Its basic structure consists of a 19-carbon chemical structure with two methylene groups, one of which is attached to C-6 and C-7 and the other to C-15 and C-16. DRSP is rapidly absorbed after oral intake and reaches a peak plasma level after 1 to 2 h. Its bioavailability is about 76% [1].
Due to its anti-mineralocorticoid action, this progestin has the property of controlling the angiotensinogen increase related to the ethinyl estradiol (EE) action when both molecules are combined in a contraceptive tablet. By preventing the transactivation of MR, the combination of DRSP with EE results in water and sodium excretion and a slight decrease in body weight as compared with classic oral contraceptive (OC) combining EE and levonorgestrel [11]. In postmenopausal women with mild hypertension, the combination of DRSP with natural estradiol in hormone therapy has been shown to induce a decrease in blood pressure [12,13].
DRSP also exerts an antiandrogenic action, lower than that of cyproterone acetate (CPA) but sufficient to be useful in women with acne when combined with EE which induces a high increase in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Therefore, in addition to contraception, the combination has been found to be useful in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder as well as in moderate acne [14,15]. Favorable effects on blood pressure and body mass index have been observed [16,17]. No negative impact on future fertility has been found with prior use of DRSP-containing COCs [18].
Dienogest has a 19-nortestosterone structure but with a 17alpha-cyanomethyl instead of a 17 ethinyl group [1,2]. It is metabolized by means of hydroxylation and aromatization [19,20]. Its pharmacokinetics make it suitable for oral administration, since it has a high oral bioavailability (>90%) and is rapidly absorbed, the peak level (tmax) is reached after 2 h and the elimination half-life is around 10 h [1]. It does not bind to SHBG; thus free serum levels of DNG tend to remain high, while free testosterone levels remain low [21]. Its antiandrogenic activity has been found to be 40% that of CPA which is the most potent antiandrogenic progestin [8]. Due to its high antiestrogenic effect on the endometrial tissue, this progestin also has the potential to be used in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and also in the treatment of endometriosis [22].
Dienogest is now combined with estradiol valerate (E2V) instead of EE as an OC with a potential for better safety due to the replacement of EE with a weaker estrogen that has much less hepatic effect on liver estrogen-dependent proteins. However, large safety surveillance studies are still to be completed to demonstrate this potential benefit. A study on the contraceptive efficacy of this OC has generated an unadjusted Pearl index of 0.73 and an acceptable bleeding profile comparable to a LNG/EE second-generation pill [23].
Trimegestone is a 19-norprogesterone derivative with strong progestational effect. TMG also possesses weak anti-androgenic and a modest anti-mineralocorticoid activity [24,25]. With regard to the progestational activity in vivo, TMG has been found to be the most potent of all progestins in the endometrial transformation test in the rabbit and counters the uterotrophic effect of estradiol (E2) in the immature mouse bioassay [26,27]. Results from preclinical studies have also demonstrated the limited effect of TMG on the GABA-ergic (γ-aminobutyric acid) system explaining the lack of unwanted mood effects in users [28].
Although TMG is a potent progestin with a good antiovulatory action, it has not been developed as a contraceptive so far. Preclinical studies in the rat have demonstrated inhibition of ovulation and anti-estrogenic activity in the uterus [24]. The contraceptive potential of using TMG via a transdermal system has been explored, but so far no clinical trial has been published [29].
Nestorone (16-methylene-17α-acetoxy-19-norpregn-4-ene-3,20-dione) is a 19-norprogesterone derivative with a high progestational activity which may be attributed to the absence of the 19-methyl radical and the addition of the 16-methylene substitute, which promotes binding to and transactivation of the PR [5,30]. Other factors which contribute to its high specificity include its lack of binding to the AR [31,32] with no binding to SHBG [29]. NES binds to GR but does not exert glucocorticoid activity in in vivo assays at the doses required for its contraceptive efficacy [30]. NES is inactive orally but highly potent when administered parenterally [33,34].
NES has been shown to exert a high contraceptive activity when administered via different nonoral delivery routes, such as vaginal rings, implants and transdermal systems. As NES has the highest antiovulatory action among existing progestins, a very low dose could be used and delivered from non oral delivery systems.
A vaginal ring containing NES/EE releasing low doses of NES (150 mcg) and EE (15 mcg) is undergoing development as a contraceptive at the Population Council [35,36]. At present, the ring is in its final stages of development. Second-generation vaginal rings, which include a design delivering NES with E2, the natural estrogen, instead of EE, are in the early developmental stage.
The contraceptive potential of NES delivered via the transdermal route has also been studied. The first study testing NES transdermal gel found it to be effective in suppressing ovulation in a high percentage of women [37]. In a 3-month multicenter study carried out among 150 cycling women, NES gel was applied transdermally in three different doses of 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 mg. The level of ovulation suppression reached 53%, 64% and 83% in the three dose groups, respectively [37,38]. Based on these promising results, higher doses of NES were combined with low doses of E2, and preliminary results indicate a high antiovulatory efficacy.
Similarly, the Metered Dose Transdermal System (MDTS), which is in the initial stages of development, is a fast drying liquid formulation used in a nonocclusive spray containing NES dosed via a precisely engineered system delivering the drug to the skin surface [39]. NES is combined with a safe skin penetration enhancer — octisalate, which forms a reservoir within the skin wherein the drug is slowly absorbed into the circulation over a duration of several hours. A pharmacokinetic trial of this new transdermal delivery system has demonstrated the feasibility of achieving serum levels of NES sufficient to block ovulation and hence provide effective contraception. A spray formulation incorporating both NES and an estrogen, either E2 or EE, is undergoing clinical trials.
NES has been tested in the form of a single implant releasing 100 mcg of NES per day administered to lactating women in a 2-year study [40]. No pregnancies were reported in 2195 women-months of exposure, and implant users demonstrated significantly less irregular bleeding compared to copper-T IUD users. This progestin also has the advantage of being safe for infants as NES is not active orally and is quickly destroyed in the gastrointestinal tract. Massai et al. [40] followed the growth of infants who were breastfed by mothers receiving an implant of NES and found no difference in infant growth and development as compared with those who were breastfed by mothers using the IUD.
Nomegestrol acetate is a 19-norprogesterone derivative which is also characterized by the absence of a methyl group at the 19 position [41]. NOMAc is a potent antigonadotropic agent in women, exerts a high progestational action although lower than NES and TMG, and has also shown some antiandrogenic effect in animal models [42]. It does not exert any androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid activities and has been shown to be neutral on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [43].
NOMAc has been tested for its contraceptive action in the form of oral pills and subdermal implants. Clinical trials with Uniplant, a single silastic capsule containing NOMAc, has shown efficacy in preventing pregnancy [44,45]. Its mechanism of action has been attributed to a high antigonadotropic activity leading to blockade of ovulation and prevention of follicular growth, as well as changes in the cervical mucus, endometrial vascularization and endometrial architecture [45,46]. At an oral dose of 1.25 mg/day, NOMAc has been shown to suppress ovulation, while at higher doses of 2.5 or 5 mg/day, full suppression of both ovulation and follicular development is seen [47]. A new OC has been developed recently combining NOMAc and E2 showing a high contraceptive efficacy and good bleeding control [48]. As for the new combination of DNG and E2V, these new contraceptives have the potential for a better safety than EE-based OCs due to the substitution of EE with a natural estrogen with less impact on the synthesis of estrogen-dependent liver proteins. However, large safety surveillance studies are still to be done after the new E2-based combinations are available, hoping that preferential prescribing and biased results will be avoided.
Review article
Organic sunscreens can be classified by whether they filter UV-B radiation, UV-A radiation, or both. Organic UV-B filters have been used since the 1970s when the first true sunscreen, para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), became available.22 Since then, many other UV-B filters have become available; their properties are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Available sunscreen agents
| Sunscreen | UV Spectrum | US Availability | Peak Absorption (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Filters | |||
| PABA | UV-B | Yes | 283 |
| Padimate O | UV-B | Yes | 311 |
| Octinoxate | UV-B | Yes | 311 |
| Cinoxate | UV-B | Yes | 289 |
| Octisalate | UV-B | Yes | 307 |
| Homosalate | UV-B | Yes | 306 |
| Trolamine salicylate | UV-B | Yes | 260–355 |
| Octocrylene | UV-B | Yes | 303 |
| Ensulizole | UV-B | Yes | 310 |
| Parsol SLX | UV-B | No | 312 |
| Uvasorb HEB | UV-B | No | 312 |
| Univil T150 | UV-B | No | 314 |
| Meradimate | UV-A | Yes | 340 |
| Avobenzone | UV-A | Yes | 357 |
| Ecamsule | UV-A | Yes | 345 |
| Univil A Plus | UV-A | No | 354 |
| Neo Helioplan AT | UV-A | No | 334 |
| Oxybenzone | UV-A/UV-B | Yes | 288 and 325 |
| Sulisobenzone | UV-A/UV-B | Yes | 366 |
| Dioxybenzone | UV-A/UV-B | Yes | 352 |
| Silatriazole | UV-A/UV-B | No | 303 and 344 |
| Bisoctrizole | UV-A/UV-B | No | 303 and 344 |
| Bemotrizinol | UV-A/UV-B | No | 305 and 360 |
| Inorganic Filters | |||
| Zinc oxide | UV-A/UV-B | Yes | |
| Titanium dioxide | UV-A/UV-B | Yes | |
Modified from Burnett CT, Rigel D, Lim HW. Current concepts in photoprotection. In: Rigel DS, Robinson JK, Ross M, et al, editors. Cancer of the skin. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011. p. 80–8.
Although PABA is an effective UV-B absorber, it is rarely used in sunscreens because of its potential to cause allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergic dermatitis.27 It is also known to stain clothing. PABA derivatives, such as padimate O, are less effective than PABA at filtering UV radiation, but they are also less likely to cause hypersensitivity reactions or stain clothing.31
As their name implies, cinnamates are derivatives of cinnamon. They are chemically related to balsam of Peru and cocoa leaves, and individuals who are sensitized to these items may cross-react to sunscreens that contain cinnamates.22 Because cinnamates are comprised of polar oils, sunscreens that contain cinnamates may leave a greasy sensation on the skin when applied.32 Octinoxate, a cinnamate, is currently the most commonly used UV-B filter in the United States.27 A weak absorber of UV-B radiation, octinoxate is frequently combined with other UV filters in sunscreens to achieve adequate sun protection. Cinoxate is another cinnamate derivative that is rarely used in modern sunscreen formulations.
Salicylates are photostable agents with high substantivity; as a result, they are frequently incorporated into water-resistant products and combined with photolabile UV-A filters, such as avobenzone.24,31 Octisalate, homosalate, and trolamine salicylate are commonly found in sunscreens. Trolamine salicylate is also often used in hair products as a UV filter.33
Octocrylene lacks substantivity, but it is frequently used with the UV-A filter, avobenzone, as a photostabilizer.34
As a water-soluble agent, ensulizole is commonly used as a component in cosmetic moisturizers.31
Protection from UV-B has historically been the focus of sunscreen development. However, as the role of UV-A radiation in photocarcinogenesis, photoimmunosuppression, and photoaging has been better understood, UV-A filters have increasingly been incorporated into commercial sunscreens. UV-A is classified as either UV-A-2 (320–340 nm) or UV-A-1 (340–400 nm) depending on wavelength, and these filters vary in their absorptive properties along the UV-A spectrum. The UV-A filter agents are summarized in Table 1.
Oxybenzone, sulisobenzone, and dioxybenzone are UV-A filters that are commonly incorporated into sunscreens. Of these, oxybenzone is the most commonly used.31 Although these agents primarily offer protection in the UV-A-2 range, a second protective band is found in the UV-B range.22 Oxybenzone is the most common cause of contact photoallergy among sunscreens, however, and its use in sunscreens is limited by its allergic properties and by its photolability.35
Avobenzone is currently the only filter approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has a peak absorbance in the UV-A-1 spectrum.27 Although avobenzone has a broad absorbance spectrum, its use has historically been limited by its photolability. Today, avobenzone is frequently incorporated into sunscreens with more photostable agents, such as octocrylene, salicylates, and oxybenzone. The results of recent studies have suggested that combining avobenzone with octocrylene provides the most effective UV-A protection available in the United States.36
Meradimate's absorption spectrum lies within the UV-A-2 range. Overall, it is a weak UV-A filter and is rarely used.24
Ecamsule is a recently approved sunscreen agent in the United States. Compared with other agents, ecamsule is a photostable and efficient UV-A filter.37
Inorganic sunscreens, such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, provide protection in the UV-A and UV-B ranges, but overall they tend to be less efficient at filtering UV radiation than the newer organic agents.31 Inorganic sunscreens have historically tended to be cosmetically unappealing; they may leave a whitish discoloration on the skin, stain clothing, and be comedogenic.25,31 Micronized formulations are now more commonly used; because particle size has decreased, these newer formulations are able to protect against shorter UV wavelengths.37
The agents discussed previously differ in their UV protective wavelengths, and a combination of several filters is often required to achieve the desired level of protection. In addition, there are several broad-spectrum UV-A and UV-B filters available outside of the United States. Bisoctrizole (absorption peaks: 303 nm and 344 nm) and bemotrizinol (absorption peaks: 305 nm and 360 nm) are examples of 2 broad-spectrum agents available in Europe that are currently undergoing approval in the United States.38
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.
These cookies are used for properly showing banner advertisements on our site and associated functions such as limiting the number of times ads are shown to each user.
ScienceDirect recommends LeapSpace
Ask questions in your own words to find answers from the broadest collection of trusted scientific content, with the help of responsible AI.