Addenum to my @LAS talk!

I don't think people realized that next basically fixes everything. Browsers will use their own sandboxes, steam, password managers, etc.

And a new VPN portal. All of the razorburn goes away.

All we need to do is gather a bunch of nerds.

I would like too amend my statement: "The gamer kids and the rust kids will save Linux, and the ops people will help them succeed."

@jorge@hachyderm.io @LAS@floss.social

I see the slides in the talk make repeated mention of creating systemd services. What does this mean for distros that use flatpak but don't have systemd?

@2something @LAS I don't know, ask them?

@jorge@hachyderm.io @LAS@floss.social

I'm asking for clarification: Will Flatpak Next/Flatpak 2 depend on systemd?

@2something @LAS Are you serious? Of course.

@jorge @2something @LAS yeah soo uhh that's going out the window apparently? yknow the biggest feature of flatpak
@2something @jorge @LAS snark apart, what is the point of depending on systemd, if the point of flatpak is to work across different distros and environments? why would flatpak depend on systemd now, even though it's worked just fine without it all this time? /genq

@hazel @2something @LAS Because it doesn't matter. What problem are you reying to solve? This is a solved problem and is best practice everywhere.

And if you don't use it why do you care?

@jorge @2something @LAS i care because i do use flatpak (granted im currently running systemd, but im working on changing that sooner than later).
does the fact that a bunch of distros that flatpak officially supports will be dropped in the future not matter though?

i believe that choice is good. saying that alternatives dont matter because most people use systemd is the same thing as saying that people shouldnt try linux because most people use windows or macos. just because something is used by most people doesnt make it The Only Choice any reasonable person should pick.

I'm genuinely trying to find why it's been chosen to have a requirement on systemd. what does it bring to flatpak?
Jorge Castro

@hazel @2something @LAS Who says anything about being dropped? What are you on about.

Who is saying that this is a requirement? Do you have a link?

@hazel @2something @LAS What problem are you trying to solve?

@jorge @2something @LAS by wanting to run something else than systemd? other people will have other reasons, but for me it's mostly because i disagree with lennart on several points, including but not limited to use of ai. i also want to have the choice to run whatever software without depending on one project that everything depends on.

@hazel @2something @LAS No one is stopping you from doing any of those things. Why is this my problem?

@jorge i'm... not even asking you to do anything. im just asking to know why you made a rather significant technical decision. i'm like genuinely confused at this point.

@hazel Who do you think I am? I didn't make a technical decision I am pointing out the obvious. Do you think one random dude just makes up rules in open source?

@jorge ...could you guide me to the person or group of people who made that choice then?

@hazel The people who show up to do the work.

@jorge what the hell does that mean 😭😭😭 im just trying to know why a decision was taken, do you have a github issue link, a group chat, anything??? we cant be for real right now

@hazel How would I know that? You keep acting like I am in some position of authority.

I'm just telling you how it is lol.

@jorge @2something @LAS

hachyderm.io/@jorge/116619028047490652

this page
flatpak.org/setup/ lists a bunch of distros. some of them straight up dont support systemd. by depending on systemd, flatpak would cease working on these distros, correct?
FlatpakFlatpak—the future of application distributionQuick Setup

@hazel @2something @LAS

Right. Everyone knows this already. We're talking about modern linux desktops - the audience is the LAS audience. I'm not talking to you.

@jorge i mean sorry but like, what constitutes as a "modern linux desktop" for you? there are extremely modern distros that dont use systemd, as well as systemd distros which lag behind by a lot. that argument straight up makes no sense.

also, i dont know what even is the point about the audience. the context of the discussion was completely changed by 2something, we might as well talk on another thread. we can talk through dms, although i doubt it'd be very productive given our exchanges so far.

@hazel None of your argument makes sense to me. Is it so hard to understand that people prefer to use linux without being bothered by people like you? Why do you care.

It's my computer. Do what you want to your computer.