>For what we would know, apes are off for any kind of stalking, for being second to us, so it would be the same in the context of (if you were not to account for "for the sake of it" variants which were never worth discussing to begin with) furry kinds, it would be the same as amnesty international, they are on the same level as those the "white knight" amnesty claims to protect, and this time it would make sense, and if you bring over the context from yourself onto this world it will be the realization (or the added benefit) of taking something that could think of itself, believe in something other than nothing, which would bring substance onto the repeated "for the sake of it" variants which kept (if not without a complete void, as always) adding and adding onto their material with (maybe in an inception way?) animals, so if a higher one beats its version, it's like torturing an ape in a concrete bunker, you know it's below you, will you continue? Obviously not, which, again, is the same as the bosnian human hunting grounds that were used by the current tripolar proponents, who were sons of senior tripolar proponents, for them it was just like deer stalking, and for the deer counterparts in fiction, would it be regular deer stalking or would they go after true counterparts? I'd imagine thay could be even more sentient, without the tools to bring it forward, their progress, making it much worse. Would love if that was the case. Without animal rights activists who bring their morals onto unaware pretty much objects who are yet protected as if they are counterparts to god himself, like in an utopia where they feed us, and not us to them. Would love to know what the site thinks of it.
