Simple or complex logos? The impact of logo complexity on brand luxuriousness perception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.04.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Marketers frequently leverage brand logos to shape brand images. While many companies opt for simplified logos, others incorporate additional elements into their logos. However, the impact of logo complexity on brand perception remains unclear. This article documents how logo complexity can create a luxurious brand image and influence consumer behavior. We first present field evidence establishing the association between logo complexity and luxury in real-world brands (Studies 1a and 1b). Next, we demonstrate the causal effect of logo complexity on perceived luxuriousness in a logo revamp scenario (Study 2). Furthermore, we show that this effect is driven by perceived craftsmanship (Study 3) and is attenuated when craftsmanship information about the brand is already emphasized (Study 4). We also find that the effect is moderated by consumers’ familiarity with the brand (Study 5). Finally, as a downstream consequence, we find that consumers are more likely to follow a luxury brand’s social media account when it features a complex (vs. simple) logo (Study 6). These findings offer valuable insights for logo design and brand communication strategies.

Introduction

A logo is the face of a brand, and nuances of logo design can shape consumers’ perceptions of the brand. The brand logo typically acts as the focal point within the brand association network, playing a crucial role in cultivating the brand’s image (Punj & Hillyer, 2004). Logo design can significantly impact consumer behavior and create financial value for a brand. An aesthetically appealing brand logo can strengthen consumer loyalty and improve firm performance (Park et al., 2013). Consumers are willing to pay a premium when a brand’s logo aligns with the product features (Jiang et al., 2016), and brands tend to have higher financial value when their logos match their brand personalities (Luffarelli et al., 2019). Recognizing the importance of a compelling logo, Pepsi invested $1 million in redesigning its logo in 2008, while Accenture spent a whopping $100 million on its logo design (Inkbot Design, 2017).
In recent times, many brands have been simplifying their logo designs. As an example, Uber replaced its coin-like icon with a straightforward, lay-it-all-bare version (O’Kane, 2018). In the fashion industry, Burberry, along with other luxury brands like Balenciaga and Celine, opted for simplified logo designs. They replaced intricate symbols with minimalist text representations of their brand names (Chen, 2018). In a surprising move in 2023, though, Burberry decided to revert to its complex logo design known as the Equestrian Knight design (Williams, 2023). While some brand experts believe that simple logos are easier for consumers to understand and remember (BusinessBlogs, 2018, Robertson, 1989), other brands are intentionally deviating from the logo simplification trend. For instance, Off-White replaced its symbolic “cross of arrows” logo with the words “off” and “white,” separated by a silhouette of a face (Espinoza, 2019). Zara’s new logo features tighter spacing and a more intricate overlapping design of tangled serifs, echoing “the style of luxury and heritage fashion brands” (Hennessy, 2019).
Despite the prevailing trend of logo redesign in favor of more simplicity (or, occasionally, more complexity), there is a dearth of research exploring how logo complexity influences brand perceptions. While several studies suggest that complex logos are less recognizable and can elicit negative affect (Henderson and Cote, 1998, Janiszewski and Meyvis, 2001, Van Grinsven and Das, 2016), the impact of logo complexity on brand perceptions remains unclear. The current research suggests that complex logos can potentially yield positive effects by enhancing the perceived luxuriousness of a brand. We first conducted an implicit association test (Study S1) to show that consumers indeed hold a mental association between complexity and brand luxuriousness, providing preliminary support for this proposition (see Web Appendix A). Further, we formally test this positive effect of logo complexity on brand luxuriousness perception and show that this effect is driven by perceived craftsmanship. Since luxury brands are known for their attention to detail (Fionda & Moore, 2009), a brand that demonstrates craftsmanship in its product creation is perceived as more luxurious. It is important to note that this effect is not limited to luxury brands, though our theorizing is primarily based on luxury brand literature. We will further show the generalizability of this effect in the empirical package.
By linking logo complexity to the perceived luxuriousness of a brand, this research makes three major theoretical contributions. First, the existing literature has investigated how various visual elements of logo design impact brand perceptions such as brand innovativeness (Hagtvedt, 2011), comfortableness/durability (Jiang et al., 2016), and excitement (Luffarelli et al., 2019). The current research adds to this literature by examining the influence of logo design on brand luxuriousness. Second, it introduces a novel antecedent, logo complexity, to the study of brand luxuriousness perception, complementing prior research (e.g., Chu et al., 2021, Fuchs et al., 2013, Park and Hadi, 2020, Van Rompay et al., 2012). We also demonstrate the underlying mechanism of this observed effect, namely perceived craftsmanship. Third, while prior research focused on the negative impacts of visual complexity (e.g., Bossel et al., 2019, Henderson and Cote, 1998, Janiszewski and Meyvis, 2001, Van Grinsven and Das, 2016), the current research revealed its positive impact on brand perceptions. In addition, our findings provide practical implications for marketing practitioners and branding experts, offering guidance on the design or redesign of logos to cultivate the desired brand image. We also highlight that this effect is moderated by consumer familiarity, providing marketing practitioners with more nuanced insights.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

The influence of logo design on brand perception

A brand logo is “the graphic design that a company uses to identify itself or its products” (Henderson & Cote, 1998). It is a vital element of brand equity, often serving as the central node in the brand association network and playing a key role in triggering memories related to the brand (Punj and Hillyer, 2004, Walsh et al., 2010).
Previous studies indicate that the visual attributes of a logo can evoke various associations, potentially influencing consumers’ perceptions of the product or

Study 1a

Studies 1a and 1b provided field evidence using real brand logos to examine the relationship between logo complexity and brand luxuriousness. Study 1a focused on the fashion industry by comparing the logo complexity of luxury brands with that of fast-fashion brands. The fashion industry was chosen because it is the most prominent sector for luxury brands and has been extensively discussed in the literature (Fionda and Moore, 2009, Ko et al., 2019, Nueno and Quelch, 1998). We predicted that, on

Study 1b

In Study 1b, we extended our investigation to multiple industries to explore whether logo complexity positively predicts brand luxuriousness.

Study 2

In Study 2, we aimed to manipulate logo complexity and examine its causal effect on perceived brand luxuriousness in a logo revamp scenario. Prior research suggests that brand luxuriousness is often linked to perceptions of exclusivity and reduced approachability (e.g., Chu et al., 2021, Ko et al., 2019, Vigneron and Johnson, 2004, Ward and Dahl, 2014). In Studies 2 and 3, we also measured perceived brand approachability to explore how logo complexity influences this perception.

Study 3

Study 3 examined our proposed mechanism: a brand is perceived as more luxurious because the complexity of its logo enhances the perceived craftsmanship of the brand.

Study 4

Study 4 aimed to provide process evidence via a moderation-of-process approach. Specifically, we expected the effect of logo complexity on brand luxuriousness perception to attenuate when information about craftsmanship is already emphasized. When a brand is described to have a high level of craftsmanship, there is limited room for logo complexity to further elevate the craftsmanship perception and thus, the proposed effect should be weakened.

Study 5

The objectives of Study 5 were three-fold. First, while previous studies have established the effects of logo complexity on brand luxuriousness for fictitious brands, we aimed to generalize these effects to a real brand to enhance ecological validity. Second, building on prior research suggesting that brand familiarity moderates the impact of visual stimuli on brand perceptions (Lee et al., 2018, Luffarelli et al., 2019), we hypothesized that the effect of logo complexity on brand luxuriousness

Study 6

Many brands are increasingly leveraging digital marketing channels to shape their brand image. Therefore, it is important to explore whether logo complexity can influence consumer behavior in an online environment. Study 6 aimed to examine whether logo complexity influences consumers’ behavior towards a social media account associated with luxury. In previous studies, we have documented a link between logo complexity and perceptions of luxuriousness. We hypothesized that a complex (vs. simple)

General discussion

Across seven studies, we provide consistent evidence that logo complexity increases the perceived luxuriousness of a brand. First, we established the association between logo complexity and luxuriousness in real fashion brands (Study 1a) and a diverse sample of globally recognized brands (Study 1b). Subsequently, by manipulating logo complexity in fictitious brands, we established its causal effect in a logo revamp scenario (Study 2) and identified perceived craftsmanship as the underlying

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qing Tang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Xun (Irene) Huang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Kuangjie Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (72)

  • T.J. Van Rompay et al.

    Served straight up: Effects of verticality cues on taste evaluations and luxury perceptions

    Appetite

    (2019)
  • Y. Wang

    A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption

    International Journal of Research in Marketing

    (2022)
  • A.L. Alter et al.

    Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle)

    Psychological Science

    (2008)
  • BusinessBlogs

    7-reasons-a-simple-logo-is-the-best-option-for-your-brand

  • J. Bond

    5-luxury-fashion-brands-doing-minimalism-perfectly

  • S.A. Brasel et al.

    Living brands: Consumer responses to animated brand logos

    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

    (2016)
  • S. Chen

    Simplifying a luxury brand logo is not that simple

  • X.Y. Chu et al.

    Values created from far and near: Influence of spatial distance on brand evaluation

    Journal of Marketing

    (2021)
  • L. Cian et al.

    This logo moves me: Dynamic imagery from static images

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (2014)
  • V. De Barnier et al.

    Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands

    Journal of Brand Management

    (2012)
  • Deloitte. (2019). Global power of luxury goods 2019....
  • D. Dion et al.

    Managing status: How luxury brands shape class subjectivities in the service encounter

    Journal of Marketing

    (2017)
  • Ernst & Young

    11-growth-drivers-fueling-the-evolution-of-the-luxury-goods-industry

  • J. Espinoza

    Virgil Abloh’s Off-White introduces a new logo design

  • T.M. Fajardo et al.

    The contingent nature of the symbolic associations of visual design elements: The case of brand logo frames

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (2016)
  • F. Faul et al.

    G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

    Behavior Research Methods

    (2007)
  • J.M. Feldman et al.

    Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1988)
  • A.M. Fionda et al.

    The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand

    Journal of Brand Management

    (2009)
  • C. Fuchs et al.

    All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands

    Journal of Marketing

    (2013)
  • H. Hagtvedt

    The impact of incomplete typeface logos on perceptions of the firm

    Journal of Marketing

    (2011)
  • A.F. Hayes

    Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach

    (2017)
  • P.W. Henderson et al.

    Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos

    Journal of Marketing

    (1998)
  • B. Hennessy

    Repositioning through brand: Zara’s controversial new logo

  • E.T. Higgins

    Activation: Accessibility, and salience

    (1996)
  • J.E. Lee et al.

    Visual communication of luxury fashion brands on social media: Effects of visual complexity and brand familiarity

    Journal of Brand Management

    (2018)
  • I. Design

    Top 10 most expensive logo designs & rebrands ever

  • Cited by (6)

    • Augmented Reality in Logo Design: Towards an Interactive Brand Experience in the Digital Space

      2025, 19th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies Aict 2025 Conference Proceedings
    View full text