Actually this message mentions "bad opsec", something Workman goes on and on about on bsky when talking about one specific user he's repeatedly banned. Seems he's tried to tie that specific user to you personally,
It’s also funny to me that the message says “good luck growing up in the future”. I’m pretty sure that my future is much brighter than the one of the spoiled terminally online troon manchild that IP flags and bans people from his lame wiki constantly for “wrongthink” as well as the slightest of disagreements.
So wait, is the bad opsec guy actually a poster in this thread, or does this fat tranny retard just mistakenly believe that someone in this thread is the bad opsec guy? That's something else that amuses me about troons like Workman, the way they get an idea in their head and then start presenting it as if it's fact, and if you don't believe them you're a heccin' transphobe CHUD.
X is so bigbrained he didn’t notice that the ween was editing from one of those Verizon pool IPs that gets assigned to a different router every day. He’s made this mistake in the past and it’s hilarious to see it again. He essentially just banned a bunch of random people (including @Captain Quazar) to get back at one retard.
20 bucks says he'll read the thread, see this, and realize he's a complete retard who did no research. What happens next is a tossup. I can see him not mentioning this finding to his troon followers on Bluesky so he can preserve his image of having "owned the chuds". If he does bring it up, I can honestly see him trying to spin it as "oops I forgot to look into the IP and I've just discovered on my own that it is dynamic and gets reassigned constantly". But he's already not-so-subtly admitted to reading Kiwifarms so who knows what he'll do.
No, you fucking retard, you're making us not only hate you more but we'll gladly double down until you are destroyed. Because you are a completely unlikable person except by anyone else in your cult.
Gonna crosspost this from the Xkeeper thread myself.
Context is that he was thanked for documenting the Punch Out NES prototype (the pre-Mike Tyson one) in a video covering it but I pointed out his contributions were only starting it mostly, as it was fleshed out by many other people.
I was very disappointed to see Tony mention the creeper. I hope it doesn't destroy his age-defying skill.
It could be, but it's possibly more complicated than that, considering the Mike Tyson version of Punch Out came close after the japanese prize version, and could have had american prototypes as a result. It's still got a lot of potential to be a fake, but it would be a really expertly crafted one, all things considered. The American release could have even been planned first, like some NES games have ended up being even when they're first party titles.
Even if it was planned with the US as the primary market it still would have, in my opinion anyway, likely been developed on Famicom hardware, simply because the two are nearly identical and Famicom is what the devs were used to working on. For being a fake it doesn't have to be a romhack or anything. Could also be a real version put onto random shit the faker had lying around. Tony even said in the video that he's never seen some of those components used in dev hardware before. There should just be all sorts of alarm bells ringing with how "one off" every single part of the shown off proto is. I can accept, blindly even, one one off but I can't take five or six totally unrelated ones.
Good to see that most pages are outdated and many games don't even have their own articles, but the troon still finds time for his daily cope and schizophrenia session.
I can tell.
You need to be 18 or older to use this website.
