Secret Goth Kid!

Text

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

myfootyrthroat:

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

myfootyrthroat:

When online “leftists” are like “liberals are basically Nazis. They need to be rounded up and killed so that their degenerate ideas can’t infect the proletariat.”

Bruh, you think other people sound like Nazis?

No, you don’t understand what’s being said. Liberals are not ‘just like’ Nazis. The problem with liberals is they will happily support and work with Nazis whenever capitalism is criticized or if socialists are elected into power.


They happily enable Nazis and betray the people to protect corporate interests. If you don’t uunderstand this, then you need to educate yourself because it’s been happening for at least a hundred years every time socialists get close to power. It’s how the all the fascist powers get into control.

It’s odd because you put ‘just like’ in quotes as if I said it. My words are right there, and I did not. And yet you accuse me of misunderstanding…

And it’s funny that there’s always the accusation that liberals will side with fascism. Mussolini started out as a socialist. How’d that turn out? Historically you don’t have a great precedent as far as socialist leaders and eventual fascism.

Mussolini wasn’t a ‘socialist’ he was a leg breaking thug who found his employment in a corrupt union. A criminal, who was always a totalitarian at heart.

Your ignorance is showing, and I suspect you are proving yourself to be the precise sort of liberal I was talking about.

🙄

Text

They should make a vape that emits a tiny, one-person puff of nerve gas if you hit it on public transit.

Text

doomhamster:

myfootyrthroat:

myfootyrthroat:

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

myfootyrthroat:

When online “leftists” are like “liberals are basically Nazis. They need to be rounded up and killed so that their degenerate ideas can’t infect the proletariat.”

Bruh, you think other people sound like Nazis?

No, you don’t understand what’s being said. Liberals are not ‘just like’ Nazis. The problem with liberals is they will happily support and work with Nazis whenever capitalism is criticized or if socialists are elected into power.


They happily enable Nazis and betray the people to protect corporate interests. If you don’t uunderstand this, then you need to educate yourself because it’s been happening for at least a hundred years every time socialists get close to power. It’s how the all the fascist powers get into control.

It’s odd because you put ‘just like’ in quotes as if I said it. My words are right there, and I did not. And yet you accuse me of misunderstanding…

And it’s funny that there’s always the accusation that liberals will side with fascism. Mussolini started out as a socialist. How’d that turn out? Historically you don’t have a great precedent as far as socialist leaders and eventual fascism.

I mean, the actual literal historical Nazi party was a socialist party that was subverted to fascism. Come tf on.

“Liberals betraying socialists is how all the fascist powers get into control!”

Are you. Entirely sure about that, @realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd ?

There’s never been a government who went straight from socialism to (a reasonable facsimile of) fascism? While betraying the liberals on the way?

Not in, say, the Soviet Union? Or China?

(I mean, I’m not sure I’d take the Nazis as an example, I’ve always been under the impression their “socialism” was a highly informed attribute and that they regarded actual socialists as the enemy. Which sadly didn’t stop said socialists from thinking they could ally with the Nazis in order to fight the terrible liberals; hence the term “beefsteak Nazi”. Brown on the outside, red on the inside.)

Oh yeah, I wouldn’t say that the Nazi party were “actually” socialist, but leftists really need to get better at vetting so they aren’t constantly pushing leftist chosen-one candidates who were Republicans last election cycle.

Text

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

doomhamster:

myfootyrthroat:

myfootyrthroat:

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

myfootyrthroat:

When online “leftists” are like “liberals are basically Nazis. They need to be rounded up and killed so that their degenerate ideas can’t infect the proletariat.”

Bruh, you think other people sound like Nazis?

No, you don’t understand what’s being said. Liberals are not ‘just like’ Nazis. The problem with liberals is they will happily support and work with Nazis whenever capitalism is criticized or if socialists are elected into power.


They happily enable Nazis and betray the people to protect corporate interests. If you don’t uunderstand this, then you need to educate yourself because it’s been happening for at least a hundred years every time socialists get close to power. It’s how the all the fascist powers get into control.

It’s odd because you put ‘just like’ in quotes as if I said it. My words are right there, and I did not. And yet you accuse me of misunderstanding…

And it’s funny that there’s always the accusation that liberals will side with fascism. Mussolini started out as a socialist. How’d that turn out? Historically you don’t have a great precedent as far as socialist leaders and eventual fascism.

I mean, the actual literal historical Nazi party was a socialist party that was subverted to fascism. Come tf on.

“Liberals betraying socialists is how all the fascist powers get into control!”

Are you. Entirely sure about that, @realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd ?

There’s never been a government who went straight from socialism to (a reasonable facsimile of) fascism? While betraying the liberals on the way?

Not in, say, the Soviet Union? Or China?

(I mean, I’m not sure I’d take the Nazis as an example, I’ve always been under the impression their “socialism” was a highly informed attribute and that they regarded actual socialists as the enemy. Which sadly didn’t stop said socialists from thinking they could ally with the Nazis in order to fight the terrible liberals; hence the term “beefsteak Nazi”. Brown on the outside, red on the inside.)

If you want a great example of liberals enabling fascism, you need look no further than the modern democrats going along with trumpism repeatedly. Appeasing, enabling, and most of all viciously attacking any challengers from the left. They would far rather allow fascism to flourish than allow socialism to gain any foothold.

As for the USSR and the China? Power corrupts, and absolute power is what both groups had in a classic power vacuum. It would have been shocking if bad elements within those revolutions had NOT taken advantage, but they remain. Irrelevant to this argument as neither one was anything close to fascism.

No, when fascism rises out of an already existing government dominated by liberals, as were Germany and Italy, as was the USA, those liberals will always betray the people to protect their capital and the capital of the wealthy.

Here in the real world, “leftists” regularly protested Biden and Harris but Trump events go on without interruption, because blocking fascism is not their goal.

I like how when a leftist goes fascist, you’re like “well, actually they were liberal” because your brain is pudding.

I’m not saying “leftists are bad”, I’m saying “there is no political alignment someone can claim that makes them ontologically good. You still have to look at what they are actually doing and think critically,” but you took that personally because you don’t think.

Text

I love how you can come on Tumblr and say “I was in the crosswalk and a driver honked at me,” and you’ll get responses from people who try to correct your story.

“They were probably honking because your car shouldn’t be driving across the cross walk.” (I was walking.)

“They didn’t really honk, it was probably their radio.”

This isn’t a literary analysis. Only one of us (me) was actually there. I’m right. And if I wasn’t, you’d have literally no way to correct me anyway.

Text

stopsignsworstenemy:

short-wooloo:

vettir:

myfootyrthroat:

realityis4thosewhocanthandlelsd:

myfootyrthroat:

When online “leftists” are like “liberals are basically Nazis. They need to be rounded up and killed so that their degenerate ideas can’t infect the proletariat.”

Bruh, you think other people sound like Nazis?

No, you don’t understand what’s being said. Liberals are not ‘just like’ Nazis. The problem with liberals is they will happily support and work with Nazis whenever capitalism is criticized or if socialists are elected into power.


They happily enable Nazis and betray the people to protect corporate interests. If you don’t uunderstand this, then you need to educate yourself because it’s been happening for at least a hundred years every time socialists get close to power. It’s how the all the fascist powers get into control.

It’s odd because you put ‘just like’ in quotes as if I said it. My words are right there, and I did not. And yet you accuse me of misunderstanding…

And it’s funny that there’s always the accusation that liberals will side with fascism. Mussolini started out as a socialist. How’d that turn out? Historically you don’t have a great precedent as far as socialist leaders and eventual fascism.

Yeah, historically, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was famously between fascists and liberals.

Pretty much everything Leftists accuse liberals of doing, they themselves are doing.

Liberals are supporting a genocide in Gaza, you say? *stares at leftists calling for the genocide of Jews*

Don’t forget german commies siding with the nazis against liberals

considering how many online leftists actually wanted trump to win and openly claim they rather see jd vance be president than vote for a democratic candidate, already shows that leftists are more willing to work with fascists more than ever

Yeah, and you get all the posts like “Democrats are siding with Trump! We need more progressive candidates!” And the “Democrats” are people like Fetterman or Sinema. Those were supposed to be the progressives! They were supposed to be holding the line when normie Democrats capitulated, and now they’re the furthest right!

Text

juney-blues:

juney-blues:

juney-blues:

“a lot of people would much rather imagine doing violence to a category of ontologically evil person than actually do anything to address the systemic issues that lead to harm in the real world” is one of those things you can say and it makes a lot of people angrily eager to prove you right it turns out.

no sure you’re right, angrily posturing about castrating Pedophiles is the best way to Protect The Children.

While you’re at it do you wanna buy a gun and move to a castle doctrine state, and start taking potshots at anyone who tries to make a u-turn in your driveway, so you can later start telling the jury about just how Determined you were to Protect Your Family?

do you wanna start lobbying for increases to police budgets so your fucking suburb can finally be Tough On Crime?

are you finished jerking yourselves off over how badass you are? do you want to like actually do anything about real problems, or do you just wanna make up boogeymen to give you an excuse to harass minorities?

coming into my inbox talking about how much you hate and want to kill Pedophiles does as much to convince me you care about the safety and wellbeing of children as talk about Junkies convinces me you care about drug safety, or Rioters about protest etiquette.

this isn’t anything to you. not really. you’ve just imagined a villain in your head and you want to feel good about doing violence to them like they Deserve. you couldn’t give a rat’s ass about how the social status of children leaves them vulnerable to abuse. you don’t care one bit about when children are *actually* taken advantage of. you just want a strawman Evil Sexual Degenerate to stand up against. it’s fucking pathetic.

(via saltdust-crusader)

Text

The irony of the “grwm while I explain ___” videos.

You’re showing me that companies convinced you that your face will fall off if you don’t apply $300 of goop twice a day, or consume that value of untested powders and supplements.

You are too gullible to be trusted re: geopolitics.

Text

doberbutts:

therapatical:

I’ll share actual evidence w/ people when it’s my own post that I’m not doing just to answer the ask sent by people who don’t give a fuck anyways. by the way. I’m not gonna give evidence when you’re asking for it in bad faith because you’re demanding labor from me and I see it plain as day. I know what you’re trying to do. it’s not worth my time or energy to exhaust myself trying to prove a point to you when I know you’ve buried your head in the sand to begin with. cope and seethe or whatever

image

I think about this every time.

Text

doberbutts:

doberbutts:

I know it’s all down to a matter of personal taste but what do you MEAN most people look at a very large, very hairy man with gentle hands and a soft voice and don’t think he’s the hottest thing to ever exist and possibly the most masculine thing in the room

image

I can assure you that op very much is not talking about buff guys and is in fact saying that fat hairy men with good hearts and gentle hands and soft voices are peak masculinity and deserve the world. And I mean it sincerely.

(via doberbutts)

Text

junglejim4322:

Unironically I think the early to mid 20s age group in America has unbelievably bad consent boundaries on all levels and so much language to defend it but this makes me sound like elon musk if I say it however the commonality of someone who will be like “I had 47 panic attacks and it’s your fault” if you tell them no is insane

(via smegorl)

Text

some-fuckin-werewolf:

so i’m no huge fan of rideshare and delivery apps, but this? this post?

image

completely fake. the article linked above thoroughly debunks it.

(via phaeton-flier)

Text

errorschacha:

Do the workers who run state-sponsored disinfo accounts get paid overtime when they gotta turbo-post in the wake of major news events or are their government employers ripping them off?

Text

afurioushawk:

image

(via smegorl)

  • Question:

    people also love to talk about how eventually the liberals and coservatives in weimar sided with the nazis but conveniently leave out that after both of the 1932 Reichstag elections, communists and nazis co-operated to block all legislation and veto all presidential decrees with their shared parliamentary majority to make governance impossible and destabilise the republic, which is why Hindenburg (president) and von Papen (chancellor) decided to make Hitler chancellor in the first place. The communist BSW (a minor party) in Germany right now is the loudest voice by far in demanding that the AfD be treated like a regular party and given parliamentary leadership positions.

    - Anonymous
  • Answer:

    !!

Text

beardedmrbean:

image

(via biglawbear)

Text

jackpotcomicsno5:

the whole “real punk values” thing is literally like the whole thing liberal religious people do where theyre like “well REAL christian values are actually kindness and charity and socialism” in very very vague and cherry picked terms that ignores the wider issue of harmful values its just the secular version. “real” punk values are not a real thing. this is not a legitimate belief system. every individual person who listens to punk rock music will have a different belief system and historically punk musicians have all been very different from each other. there have always always been leftist punks and liberal punks and conservative punks and there are very very well established subsets of punk that are extremely and explicitly white supremacist and you cant say any one of these is “real punk” or “not real punk” because it is literally just a music and aesthetic based subculture. you cant say racist skinheads are “not real punks” because that is categorically untrue and does absolutely nothing to combat the proliferation of those ideologies. it only ignores the issue of bigotry within a subculture rather than doing something about it.

(via smegorl)