3

I was wondering if Sierpinski numbers would work in other bases, and after a little experimentation: yep!

For instance,

15723n2

is composite for all n using a tiny covering set. Or,

551511n+2.

If I'm mistaken, please let me know.

4
  • This is interesting (+1). How did you find these? Commented Dec 10, 2019 at 7:05
  • 1
    Picked bases likely to be neutral relative to the numbers that usually make up these covering sets (3,5,7,13,17,19,37,73,etc), and then quick brute force check for a coefficient which seemed to hit those 0-congruences. Commented Dec 10, 2019 at 8:12
  • Note that these differ from classic Sierpinski numbers not only in the base not being 2 but also the added constant isn’t 1 Commented Dec 10, 2019 at 8:15
  • 1
    Cf. Riesel number base b Commented Dec 10, 2019 at 8:26

1 Answer 1

3

157×232k+121×22=0mod3,

157×234k+22(2)(1)2=0mod53,

and 157×234k22×12=0mod5,

so 157×23n2 is composite for all n.

5515×113k+1+25×11+20mod19,

5515×113k+2+26×16+20mod7,

5515×112k+21×1+20mod3,

and 5515×116k+3+22×(1)+20mod37,

so 5515×11n+2 is composite for all n.

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.