I read with cautious optimism about the plans to upgrade the infrastructure of ageing MRT stations, including widening platforms, and adding more lifts and escalators (Two new MRT lines under study; Jurong Region Line extension in West Coast to proceed, March 5).

Another candidate in need of rejuvenation is the Circle Line (CCL).

Every day, the CCL teems with people because it is integral for commuters travelling to the north-east, or from east to west while skirting the city centre. 

Its unique radial path means it is constantly funnelling passengers to various destinations, much like a roundabout. This is unlike other trunk lines where demand tapers towards the terminals.

It is no wonder that stations such as Serangoon and Bishan attract negative media attention for their overspilling crowds during peak hours, and especially during train disruptions. 

Three-car trains and narrow platforms are already inadequate for busy CCL interchanges which are heavyweight destinations in their own right.

Reducing train intervals, while essential given the current hardware, can only go so far to alleviate the crowds.

Top stories

Explore top stories from all sections in one place

World

Artemis II astronauts safely back on Earth after trip around the moon

Singapore

Who, what and why: DBS to roll out probing questions for high-risk transfers

Singapore

Commuters can look forward to new Circle Line trains from April 13

Opinion

Mega cruises are reinventing the modern holiday

Singapore

Empowering special needs youth, one vending machine at a time

Business

Cut through the noise: Don’t let politics get in the way of a good portfolio

With the planned extension of the Jurong Region Line to Kent Ridge, ridership on the CCL is projected to rise.

I am sure robust, comfortable and reliable transport infrastructure would nudge more Singaporeans to adopt a car-lite lifestyle.

I urge the Land Transport Authority and the Ministry of Transport to seriously consider the issues endured by many commuters for years.

For a start, platform extensions can pave the way for higher-capacity trains with more carriages, easing bottlenecks at stations. Other makeovers to make commutes more pleasant for all would be much welcome, too.

Keanen Ang

We refer to Mr Norman Lee’s letter, “Changing EVs’ licence plates not practical or sustainable” (April 1).

Electric vehicle (EV) fires present the risk of thermal runaway in high-voltage batteries, which will require different response tactics should a fire occur. Quick identification of EVs is critical to guide appropriate actions and ensure the safety of both first responders and the public. The proposal to introduce differentiated licence plates for EVs is therefore necessary to provide a clear and immediate visual identifier to support emergency response.

The proposed designs are preliminary and will be refined, taking into account operational requirements, visibility considerations and stakeholder feedback. SCDF and LTA have commenced stakeholder engagements involving authorised motor dealers and signcraft workshops as well as EV and PHEV owners to gather feedback on the proposed design and implementation approach.