I've gotten many replies where people have looked at my avatar and assume I'm a furry, and that I'm into furry porn, so they think they're on equal footing and say things like "If lolicon is pedophilia, then furry porn is zoophilia".
Okay, I'll happily agree to that. I'm glad that you were willing to instantly concede to my argument.
I'm not a furry, and I don't enjoy furry porn. That's just what you assumed when you saw my avatar. This isn't some fursona that I've created or commissioned, it's an AI generated picture. I've said this many times. I have zero investment into the furry community or furry culture.
The prompt even mentions "screenshot from a 1996-1998 anime", so it's not actually supposed to be furry art, it's supposed to be an anime bear man.
Personally, I like the aura of boldness that comes from the confident smug grin, especially for moments like this.
However, it obviously has some furry influence in it, otherwise lots of people wouldn't assume it's furry art. There's clearly some truth to that. Where they commit a clear error is when they make further assumptions.
What does that say about the people who think you beat off to drawings of little kids? You self identify as lolicons, so you admit to the beating, but not to the fact that they clearly look like children.
Thanks for playing.
And no, nobody is saying that real human beings faces look exactly like anime faces. The extent depends on the art style, but the face is typically the most stylized part, while the rest of the body remains much more closer to human anatomy.
If you're seeking out porn featuring very petite, exceptionally child looking, but legally adult actresses, I'd say that it's noncy behavior, especially when the actress plays into and emphasizes their childlike appearance with things like school uniforms, pigtails and braces. That's called "pedobaiting". If you get hooked onto the bait, what does that obviously say about you?
