Advertisement
Advertisement
The Texas Tribune

White Texans, students previously in private school or home-school make up bulk of voucher applicants

Jaden Edison
3 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Summer school students leave a Dobie Middle School classroom in Austin on July 23, 2025:
(Ilana Panich-Linsman for The Texas Tribune)
  • Preliminary data from the Texas school voucher program shows that most applicants are white families with children who previously attended private school or were home-schooled.

Most of Texas’ school voucher applications come from white families and children who previously attended a private school or home-school.

The Texas comptroller’s office, which manages the program, released preliminary data before applications for families interested in vouchers closed Tuesday night. The program will allow them to use taxpayer funds to pay for private school or home-schooling costs.

Of the 256,700 Texans who applied as of late March, 45% are white, 23% are Hispanic and 11% are Black. Low-income families make up 36% of applicants — defined as a family of four earning $66,000 or less per year.

Advertisement
Advertisement

For comparison, 24% of Texas public school students are white, 54% are Hispanic and 13% are Black. About 60% of public school students are considered low-income — defined as a family of four earning $61,050 or less annually.

In addition, about 73% of applicants attended a private school or home-school during the 2024-25 academic year. The comptroller did not provide data on students’ current enrollment.

The state is expected to release final data this week.

“It’s not surprising that a state as big as Texas has more voucher applicants than other smaller states, especially with such a large marketing budget,” Carrie Griffith, executive director of Our Schools Our Democracy, a public education advocacy group, said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It’s also not surprising that so few public school families have applied for a private school voucher,” Griffith added. “Public schools deliver special education services, provide transportation, support extracurriculars, keep kids safe, and prepare them for life. They are one of Texas’s most effective, unifying public institutions. And the data remains undeniable: Most Texans want strong, fully funded public schools — not vouchers.”

Most participating families with children in private schools will receive about $10,500 annually. Home-schoolers can receive up to $2,000 per year. Children with disabilities qualify for up to $30,000 — an amount based on what it would cost to educate that child in a public school.

In other states with voucher programs structured like Texas’, white families with children previously in private school make up the majority of participants.

Travis Pillow, a spokesperson for the comptroller, said Texas anticipates having only enough funding for children with disabilities and students from low- and middle-income families. Program participants, Pillow believes, will look different than the pool of applicants.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We are working on a detailed report that captures all our outreach efforts for year 1, but we know there’s going to be more work to do to get the word out in year 2 and beyond,” Pillow said. “We’ll be looking for opportunities to reach more families we didn’t reach in year 1 and for ways to build trust in this new program.”

Demand for the program exceeds $1 billion in available funding, which means the state will conduct a lottery to determine who can receive vouchers. The state will consider, in order of priority:

  • Students with disabilities and their siblings in families with an annual income at or below 500% of the federal poverty level, which includes a four-person household earning less than roughly $165,000 a year (12% of applicants).

  • Families at or below 200% of the poverty level, which includes a four-person household earning less than roughly $66,000 (31% of applicants).

  • Families between 200% and 500% of the poverty level (30% of applicants).

  • Families at or above 500% of the poverty level (22% of applicants); these families can receive up to $200 million of the program’s total budget. Children who attended public school for at least 90% of the prior school year will receive priority within this group (5% of applicants).

Families must still find private schools — which are generally not required to accommodate students with disabilities, who make up 14% of applicants — to accept their children. That will ultimately determine who receives voucher funding.

Parents must have their children enrolled in a school by July 15. Later this month, families will begin finding out if they can receive voucher funding.

Comment summary
Powered by Yahoo Scout. Yahoo is using AI to generate key points from user comments. This means the info may not always match user comments about the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.

Comments include criticism that Texas voucher programs mainly benefit wealthier, often white families already using private or home schools, seen as a transfer of public funds to the affluent. Other comments point to concerns about public school funding cuts and debates over racial and political motives behind the program.

Views expressed are from commenters only.
Up next
The Texas Tribune

T-Squared: We’re relaunching our Texas Public Schools Explorer to better serve parents and teachers

Chris Essig, Rob Reid and Alex Ford
2 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
  • The Texas Tribune redesigned its Public Schools Explorer to provide more timely data and features for navigating the state’s public school system.

The Texas Tribune redesigned its Public Schools Explorer to add more timely data and features to help families and teachers navigate the state’s sprawling public school system.

In all, Texas has 1,202 school districts and 9,113 public schools, including hundreds of charter schools and alternative campuses. About 5.5 million students attend public schools in Texas, and our explorer includes information on all of them.

It’s an overwhelming amount of data, which is why our journalists focused on organizing the site in a more intuitive way. We included more context to explain what the numbers mean and why they matter. In addition, each school’s performance is compared against statewide and regional trends, which will help families better understand how their child’s school is performing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

We feel this is the perfect time to launch a new site. Parents and families need to be able to see the options available for their children’s education, especially as school choice expands in Texas. We’re showing readers their local campus and nearby campuses, including traditional school districts and charter schools. We show how their school demographics, funding and other characteristics have changed over time to help illustrate broader trends.

We also hope this tool will be useful to teachers, school staff, policymakers and anyone curious about Texas education — including those who need accurate and reliable data to understand how policy impacts students.

Each school district and campus has its own page on the site. Within those pages, data is now organized into a handful categories, including student demographics, classroom experience, opportunities and outcomes, and more. Each category has its own URL, making it easier to share information that matters the most.

We’ve added new data from the Texas Education Agency, including funding information for school districts to help readers better understand where and how schools get money. We also redesigned the districts page to make it easier to find districts using different filters.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In addition to these new features, our site will be more up to date than ever before. Previously, the explorer was updated once a year. Now we can integrate new data as soon as the state releases it, with finance numbers expected in the spring and state accountability ratings in August.

This new explorer builds on the Data Visuals team’s ongoing work covering public education issues affecting students and teachers across the state. In a recent story, we showed how low-income students are being left behind in higher education outcomes and included a lookup tool to help readers explore the data in their own communities.

If you have feedback, email us at schools-feedback@texastribune.org. Also, stay tuned for more updates — we plan to release new features soon. After exploring the new tool, be sure to check out the Tribune’s extensive public education coverage for more on how these issues are playing out across the state.

This project is supported in part by Greater Texas Foundation and Houston Endowment.

Up next
Realtor.com

The $3.3 Billion Oversight: Why Texas Homeowners Are Leaving Massive Tax Savings on the Table

Yaёl Bizouati-Kennedy
6 min read
Add Yahoo on Google

Protesting property taxes enables homeowners to argue that their taxes are overvalued or incorrectly assessed. While rules vary by state and county, the amount of money left on the table in Texas every year is reportedly staggering.

A recent Ownwell study found that in 2025, 32% of residential properties across 17 Texas counties protested their property taxes, while 68% did not. But what’s really eye-popping is that “those who skipped their 2025 protest left $1.2B in potential property tax savings on the table,” according to the study.

Over three years, the cumulative potential missed savings totaled $3.3 billion.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A separate Ownwell study found that 74% of homeowners worry about significant increases in their annual property tax bills, especially in states where they are the highest in the country, such as Colorado, New Jersey, California, and New York. At the same time, 8 in 10 have never appealed their property tax bill, with a whopping 53% being unaware they have the right to do so.

“Texas homeowners who skip protesting their property taxes aren’t just missing out on small savings; combined, they’re leaving billions on the table,” said Colton Pace, CEO and founder of Ownwell. “In Texas, protesting your property taxes isn’t optional, it’s part of managing your housing costs.”

What's going on in Texas?

Everything’s bigger in Texas, and that can include property taxes. The reason is that the state uses a “mass appraisal” system, which can lead to inaccurate estimates and overvaluation.

This system opts for efficiency rather than accuracy, some experts argue.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Assessors use mass appraisal techniques, relying on statistical models and recent sales data rather than individual inspections. Market fluctuations, renovations, and unique features can lead to inaccuracies,” according to Texas Tax Protest.

The lack of "boots on the ground" and nuance of individual property conditions can be detrimental to homeowners. Tax assessors use the “comparable sales” metric instead, relying on statistical models and recent sales data rather than individual inspections, according to Texas Tax Protest.

Pace explains that mass appraisal is efficient for county assessors, but often misses property-specific issues like condition, location quirks, or recent or needed repairs.

“That’s why overvaluation is so common; these systems aren’t designed to capture the nuances of every single home. Protesting is essentially how homeowners reintroduce those missing details,” he added.

Advertisement
Advertisement

By comparison, in states such as California, Proposition 13 mandates a property tax rate of 1%, “requires that properties be assessed at market value at the time of sale, and allows assessments to rise by no more than 2% per year until the next sale,” according to the National Bureau of Economic Research.

“Texas is unique because there’s no state income tax, so local governments rely heavily on property taxes, and that makes valuation accuracy even more important,” said Pace.

He added that Florida is more like Texas, where there’s no income tax, and state and local governments and services rely heavily on property taxes. In Texas, even with a 10% homestead cap, your starting point matters a lot more. If value is too high today and you don’t protest, that inflated number becomes the base for future increases, so you’re effectively locking in higher taxes year after year.”

Mark Gallegos, CPA and tax partner on Porte Brown’s tax services team, explains that in Texas, the protest process often serves as the primary check on valuation, whereas in California and Florida, statutory caps provide more built-in protection.

The compounding effect

The Ownwell study tracked the success rates of protesting property taxes and savings by county.

Advertisement
Advertisement

For instance, in the three counties in the San Antonio area, only 23% of homeowners protested their property taxes, “leaving an estimated $154.5M in potential savings on the table.”

And those who protested saw a 7.1% reduction, with a 76% success rate, representing a whopping $61.8 million in overall tax savings.

Meanwhile, in Bastrop County, only 15% of properties protested in 2025.

Aerial of mansions on the water in Houston Texas with pools and volleyball courts
A glimpse of the affluent neighborhood of Woodlands in Houston (Getty Images)

“Of those who protested, 65% achieved a reduction averaging 8.9% off assessed value. Nonprotesting homeowners left an estimated $8.7M in potential savings on the table—roughly $194 per property,” according to Ownwell.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Another advantage of a successful protest is that it doesn't just save money this year—it lowers the "ceiling" for the 10% homestead appraisal cap in future years.

As Cody Schuiteboer, president and CEO of mortgage broker Best Interest Financial, explained, successful protests reset an individual's baseline, so the 10% annual increase in appraisal caps does not apply, resulting in a compounding effect of savings throughout the decade.

“If a homeowner were to reduce their appraised value from $400,000 to $360,000, that homeowner would save about $48,000 over the course of a decade,” he said.

Pace echoed the sentiment: “Think of it like lowering the starting line. Every future increase is based on that lower number, so the impact builds over time. Lowering your assessed value today can save you for years, not just this tax cycle.”

Next steps for homeowners

In Texas, the protest deadline typically ends May 15, while in Florida, for example, homeowners must file petitions with the Value Adjustment Board within 25 days of the mailing of the Truth in Millage (TRIM) notice, which notifies homeowners of their taxes in August.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It’s important to note that there is a notable difference between informal processes and formal Appraisal Review Board (ARB) hearings.

Pace explained that most homeowners start with an informal hearing, where you present evidence directly to the County Appraisal District (CAD). If you can’t reach an agreed-upon assessed value, the next step is a formal hearing before the ARB, he said.

“The key is preparation—comparable sales, photos, and evidence of condition issues can make a meaningful difference in the outcome. The biggest mistake homeowners make is assuming their assessment is already accurate and fair,” he added.

Chris Gleason, founder and CEO of Simplicite Tax Loans, which provides property tax loans to Texas property owners, said the majority of its clients are residential customers who are among the 68% who did not protest.

Advertisement
Advertisement

According to him, the lack of protest is due to several reasons: a lack of understanding of taxes, fear that they might end up being taxed at a higher rate, and the process being time-consuming.

“We encourage our clients to protest every single year. It's a 'no-lose' scenario under the right circumstances,” he said.

Gallegos agrees, saying that in any system built on mass valuation, taxpayer participation is part of the process.

“If you don’t engage, you’re effectively accepting a standardized estimate that may not reflect your property’s reality,” Gallegos said.

Up next
AfroTech

Over 15,000 Minority-Owned Businesses Lose HUB Certification Under Acting Texas Comptroller

Samantha Dorisca
2 min read
Add Yahoo on Google

Changes to a Texas-based program will impact thousands of minority-owned businesses.

Acting Texas Comptroller Kelly Hancock said the Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) program would be restructured. According to the Texas Department of Transportation, the program was established to promote equal opportunities for small, minority-, and women-owned businesses. The program was signed into law in 1999 by George W. Bush, who was the Texas governor at the time, according to the Legal Defense Fund.

Now, the HUB program has been renamed and restructured as Veteran Heroes United in Business (VetHUB), according to a press release. Certifications will be approved for service-disability veterans of 20% or more with documentation such as a DD-214 Military Discharge and Disability Rating Letter issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs or Department of Defense, in addition to other required documents.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Texans deserve a level playing field where government contracts are earned by performance and best value — nothing more, nothing less,” Hancock said in a separate press release. “Our office is committed to protecting taxpayer funds and ensuring that every Texas business has an equal opportunity to compete for government contracts. This action today reflects that commitment and reinforces Texas’ longstanding principles of fairness and accountability.”

The changes to the HUB program will impact more than 15,000 businesses, many of which are led by Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and women business owners, The Root reports. Among them is Ruben Mercado Jr., a Hispanic American contractor whose business stability is being challenged following the termination of his HUB certification. Cortena Williams, a Black woman who worked in the construction industry, said she now feels the opportunities she worked hard for have been taken from her.

Business owners, including Mercado, Williams, and a trade organization, are filing a lawsuit against the State of Texas called “The HUB Case,” notes The Root.

“In this country, the legislature passes the laws, not the comptroller, and Texas is no different,” Alphonso David, president and CEO of the Global Black Economic Forum, and lead counsel for the plaintiffs, wrote in a statement, according to the Texas Tribune. “The HUB case highlights a fundamental American principle — members of the executive branch cannot rewrite laws passed by the state legislature. They cannot deny citizens of their legal rights without a court order, legislative approval, or due process.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Acting Comptroller Hancock took a program created by statute and rewrote it without any legal authority. His actions are baseless and unlawful and must be reversed,” he continued.

The post Over 15,000 Minority-Owned Businesses Lose HUB Certification Under Acting Texas Comptroller appeared first on AfroTech.



The post Over 15,000 Minority-Owned Businesses Lose HUB Certification Under Acting Texas Comptroller appeared first on AfroTech.

Up next
The Oklahoman

Oklahoma Republican leaders reach $12.8B deal to fund state government

Alex Gladden and Alexia Aston, The Oklahoman
6 min read
Add Yahoo on Google
Oklahoma Republican leaders reach $12.8B deal to fund state government

Oklahoma's governor and Republican legislative leaders have reached a multi-billion-dollar budget deal to cover rising Medicaid costs, teacher pay raises and new voting software.

Gov. Kevin Stitt joined House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, Senate President Pro Tem Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, and other GOP legislative leaders to spell out the details at a news conference Wednesday, April 1.

Legislators plan to appropriate $12.8 billion to run the state from July 2026 to June 2027, a 1.3% increase from the current fiscal year. Lawmakers said agencies are mostly in line for flat year-over-year budgets, while some will receive extra money to cover one-time costs.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hilbert described the agreement as a "secure budget" that will help preserve the state for the future. He joined his fellow Republicans in warning against the potential financial fallout of Medicaid expansion, which they said will continue to cost the state more money because of federal funding cuts.

More: Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt orders review of public education spending

Alan Gruenstein combs his son, Charlie’s hair during filing day at the Oklahoma Capitol in Oklahoma City on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.
Candidates line up during filing day at the Oklahoma Capitol in Oklahoma City on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.
OU Turning Point President Kalib Magana joins OKGOP to support lawmakers during filing day at the Oklahoma Capitol in Oklahoma City on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.

Among the line items:

  • $250 million to the Oklahoma Health Care Authority to cover Medicaid costs after changes in federal spending.

  • $79.1 million to the state's mental health agency to help cover costs of meeting the terms of a consent decree as well as Medicaid.

  • $85 million to increase teacher pay.

  • $80 million to pay for reading and math programs backed by Republican lawmakers.

  • $12 million to upgrade state voting software.

  • $200 million to fund an investment account that will grow to more than $1 billion to pay for general spending in future decades.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Budget talks are often the most contentious part of the legislative session and can stretch into the final weeks. However, the deal this year landed with nearly two months before the Legislature must finish its work.

The early agreement comes amid hopes that the legislative session will end before the May 29 deadline ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. All 101 seats in the House could be on the ballot in November along with 24 seats in the Senate.

Hilbert said the announcement on Wednesday, April 1, was the earliest budget deal that he could recall. He said it meant Oklahomans would have some time to reflect on the budget, and it would not be "crammed down everyone's throat at the last minute at the end of the legislative session."

Budget bills must still be heard in both chambers before being sent to the governor's desk for approval, meaning GOP leaders will have to convince enough Republican and Democratic lawmakers to approve of the plans before Stitt can sign them into law.

Medicaid costs squeeze state spending

At the news conference Wednesday, legislators announced the state will devote an additional $250 million to the OHCA, which manages Medicaid for the state.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This is about half of the amount that the agency requested. In January, OHCA Director Clay Bullard said that without a $495 million increase in the agency's budget, he feared the OHCA will be without cash flow.

The agency is feeling the effects of Congress drastically cutting federal funding to states' Medicaid funding in July with its One Big Beautiful Bill.

Oklahoma Republicans are also placing the blame for the high costs of Medicaid on the increased number of Oklahomans who have been able to access Medicaid since voters chose to expand Medicaid in 2021, making it a part of the state's constitution.

People who qualify for Medicaid through the expansion make up about 21% of all Medicaid users in the state, Bullard said in January.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stitt, Hilbert and Paxton have all advocated to remove this expansion fom the Constitution and make it a state statute, which would allow lawmakers to alter the requirements for coverage from what voters passed.

House Bill 4440 would send Medicaid expansion back to the voters and require an additional vote to possibly move the legislation into state code. The House has passed the bill, and it is currently being heard on the Senate floor.

"If we do not accomplish this, it's going to be harder and harder to make the budget without making cuts," Paxton said at the Wednesday, April 1 news conference.

About 24% of Oklahomans are on Medicaid. Stitt said the high proportion of the population using state-funded health insurance makes it unsustainable for the Legislature to continue to fund the program at such a high rate.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The state consistently ranks poorly in metrics tracking the health of Oklahomans. Health experts agree that having access to health insurance can allow people to obtain preventative treatments that can keep them from developing more serious health problems.

Stitt said he does not think Medicaid keeps Oklahomans healthier. He credited good health to exercising and eating healthy.

"I don't think more government services makes people healthier," Stitt said.

Literacy at the forefront of legislative priorities

Legislators agreed to provide $4.22 billion to the Oklahoma Department of Education in the upcoming budget. This amounts to a nearly 6% increase in funding from last year's budget.

Advertisement
Advertisement

They plan to spend almost $80 million to reading and math programs, as well as $85 million to teacher pay raises.

This will amount to a $2,000 raise for all teachers, said Senate Appropriations Chairman Chuck Hall, R-Perry. The goal is to get closer to the surrounding states' teacher salaries. He said the other states have much higher teacher salaries.

Before the legislative session began and during the first half of it, lawmakers made clear their biggest priority is one thing: Literacy.

Lawmakers in the House and Senate have spent the past two months trying to agree on how to improve early childhood literacy. That initiative is backed by the State Chamber of Oklahoma, which is a driving force behind business-related legislation.

Oklahoma Democrats criticize budget process

Republicans control the Legislature and set its agenda, with majorities in both chambers.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democratic leaders held a news conference Tuesday, March 31, where they said Republican lawmakers were meeting behind closed doors to discuss the budget, creating a "lack of transparency."

Sen. Michael Brooks, D-Oklahoma City, said eliminating public input makes the budget a "weaker document."

Hilbert responded to the criticism Wednesday, April 1, by saying Democrats have not been kept in the dark, and that he was waiting to see that party's budget proposal.

House Appropriations Chairman Trey Caldwell, R-Faxon, added that there have been weekly opportunities for Democrats to meet with Republicans about the budget during office hours. He said six Democrats have taken the time to do so.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"I would say that that's grossly exaggerated," Caldwell said about Democrats' complaints that they have not been included in the budget-making process.

(This story was updated to add new information.)

This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Oklahoma Gov. Stitt, GOP leaders reach $12.8B budget deal. See details

Advertisement