Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
For Subscribers Gta

They were promised two-way, all-day GO train service. Confidential Metrolinx documents show these lines may actually get slower

Internal Metrolinx report show the provincial transit agency is considering a delayed timeline for its promise of two-way, all-day, 15-minute service on the core GO network.

Updated
4 min read
GO Train Expansion

The original GO Expansion would have effectively transformed GO from a commuter railway into a European-style rapid rail system boasting 15 minutes-or-better service on core parts of the network.


Metrolinx’s promise of two-way, all-day GO service has been delayed, internal documents from the provincial transit agency show.

Meanwhile, under the reframed vision for what’s known as GO Expansion, some riders on the province’s train system could find their trips getting slower, not faster.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

More from The Star & partners

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Community Guidelines. Toronto Star does not endorse these opinions.

Conversation

|

Top Comments

    1. Comment by Austin.

      "Ontarians have no idea what is going on inside Metrolinx, how they’re making decisions..."

      Notice the common theme here? Between general expansion, the 2 new LRT lines, electronification, etc. etc., engineering firms come and go, but the guys at the top remain. You can blame the firms all you want (and yes, there are issues there to be sure), but the bureaucrats at Metrolinx get the lions share. Many of the decisions makers at Metrolinx make calls for no good reason other than to put their name on something. And when the engineering firms sound the alarm on those decisions, they are promptly ignored. The result is millions in additional consulting hours and months, if not years of delays. I speak from direct experience.

      We need more transparency at the dozens of these 'arm's length' crown corporations such as Metrolinx and OPG, otherwise you will get more stories like this, with greater stories of waste and delays.

    2. Comment by Jay.

      Imagine if they had electrified the trains ages ago- the fuel savings, the quieter trains, the cleaner air, the efficency.... we'd be much further ahead. If they aren't able to figure out how to plan for electric-run trains right out of the gate, then it's going to cost millions more later on. It's wasteful. There should not be any more building of new stations or tracks until there is an external audit and full financial transparency of Metrolinx. They are doing a ridiculously lousy job of it, and wasting enourmous sums of taxpayer money. I am tired of Ontario wasting my taxes on Metrolinx.

      I'm not a Doug Ford fan, but the failure of Metrolinx is not specific to any political party, it's a failure that has been happening annually for decades (well, Liberal and Conservative, maybe we should let NDP have a run of the province and see if they can sort it out?).

    3. Comment by Mark D.

      International experience indicates that P3s can work to alleviate public sector debt and risk, depending on the quality of the contracting including for associated risk distribution between the contracting parties. If it's not working here, this means there are managerial problems that need to be addressed, because in principle the development model should be viable if implemented properly. The article seems to indicate that there could be major managerial problems within Metrolinx related to the rational development of priorities for systems expansion, and how those priorities are defined and evaluated as such. All this needs to be further investigated and improved upon where indicated. It is unusual that private contractors would disassociate themselves from sound business opportunities if indeed the opportunities were sound to begin with, so this also deserves more transparency.

    4. Comment by Alex.

      P3's have proven to be an absolute disaster in Canada, but government keep using them for ideological reasons. The main advantage for governments is that they shift borrowing to the private sector, but then the public repays that debt at higher interest rates than the government would have gotten. Outside of this, the model delivers worse results, with less accountability under more complex management. The Eglinton LRT is operated by the TTC, maintained by Crosslinx and owned by Metrolinx. A public monopoly would have typically done all three tasks under a simpler structure.

      Metrolinx sorely needs major reform. It makes no sense for a regional transit agency and builder to have zero regional representation.

    5. Comment by steve.

      This delay is no surprise. Most of the rails that GO runs on are owned by CN except for the Milton line which is CP. Both railways receive a great deal of revenue from GO and don't want this to change. Electrification could change this, either on existing rails or on new rails owned by GO.

    Send us your Feedback