This publication is presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Duke University Press

Home Duke University Press One. Oversight: The Ordering of Slavery
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

One. Oversight: The Ordering of Slavery

The deployment of visuality and visual technologies as a Western social technique for ordering was decisively shaped by the experience of planta-tion slavery in the Americas, forming the plantation complex of visuality.1 If it has often been claimed that modernity was the product of slavery, there has been insufficient attention to the ways in which the modern “ways of seeing” also emerged from this nexus.2 What one might call the received genealogy of modern visual culture begins with the major change in the mid- seventeenth century in the European division of the sensible. It cre-ated what Foucault called “the division, so evident to us, between what we see, what others have observed and handed down, and what others imag-ine or naïvely believe, the great tripartition into Observation, Document, and Fable.”3 In this new formation, there was a gap between things and words, a gap that could be crossed by seeing, a form of seeing that would dictate what it was possible to say. As the seeing preceded the naming, that which Foucault called the “nomination of the visible” (132) was the central prac-tice. He emphasized that this was not a question of people suddenly learn-ing to look harder or more closely, but a new set of priorities attached to sensory perception. Taste and smell became less important, now being understood as imprecise, hearsay was simply excluded, while touch was limited to a series of binary distinctions, such as that between rough and oneOversightThe Ordering of Slavery
© 2020 Duke University Press, Durham, USA

The deployment of visuality and visual technologies as a Western social technique for ordering was decisively shaped by the experience of planta-tion slavery in the Americas, forming the plantation complex of visuality.1 If it has often been claimed that modernity was the product of slavery, there has been insufficient attention to the ways in which the modern “ways of seeing” also emerged from this nexus.2 What one might call the received genealogy of modern visual culture begins with the major change in the mid- seventeenth century in the European division of the sensible. It cre-ated what Foucault called “the division, so evident to us, between what we see, what others have observed and handed down, and what others imag-ine or naïvely believe, the great tripartition into Observation, Document, and Fable.”3 In this new formation, there was a gap between things and words, a gap that could be crossed by seeing, a form of seeing that would dictate what it was possible to say. As the seeing preceded the naming, that which Foucault called the “nomination of the visible” (132) was the central prac-tice. He emphasized that this was not a question of people suddenly learn-ing to look harder or more closely, but a new set of priorities attached to sensory perception. Taste and smell became less important, now being understood as imprecise, hearsay was simply excluded, while touch was limited to a series of binary distinctions, such as that between rough and oneOversightThe Ordering of Slavery
© 2020 Duke University Press, Durham, USA
Downloaded on 23.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822393726-006/html
Scroll to top button