Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

WHO officials admit they are preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran

World Health Organization staff remain ‘vigiliant’ in the event of a nuclear incident

Rhian Lubin in New York
Trump claims world should be grateful to him for stopping nuclear holocaust
Leer en Español

Officials at the World Health Organization have admitted that they are preparing for a “worst-case scenario” nuclear threat if the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran escalates.

Hanan Balkhy, WHO regional director for the eastern Mediterranean, said that staff remain “vigilant” for a nuclear incident following President Donald Trump’s decision to bomb Iran in a joint campaign with Israel.

The worst-case scenario is a nuclear incident, and that’s something that worries us the most,” Balkhy told Politico. “As much as we prepare, there’s nothing that can prevent the harm that will come … the region’s way — and globally if this eventually happens — and the consequences are going to last for decades.”

The official told the outlet that United Nations staff are preparing for an incident in “its broader sense,” including if there was an attack on a nuclear facility or the use of a weapon. “We are thinking about it, and we’re just really hoping that it does not happen,” Balkhy added.

In the wake of the bombing campaign in the Middle East, WHO is “refreshing” staff on how to respond in the event of a nuclear incident and providing guidance about long-term health risks linked to radiation exposure, Politico reports.

“I think those who read the history of previous incidents, whether intentional or accidental, are very aware of what we’re talking about,” Balkhy added.

Israel and the U.S. have continued to pummel Iran’s nuclear sites as Trump insisted Tehran was on the brink of getting a nuclear weapon.

Flames and smoke rise from an oil storage facility struck by missiles in Tehran
Flames and smoke rise from an oil storage facility struck by missiles in Tehran (ISNA)

At the beginning of “Operation Epic Fury,” which began on February 28, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair General Dan Caine insisted the goal of the operation is to eliminate Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon, echoing the same line shared by Trump and the White House when they launched the attacks.

This week, Joe Kent, Trump’s director of the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned from his post because he could not “in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran” and the country posed “no imminent threat to our nation,” he said in a post on X.

In her opening remarks to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, said that U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran last summer “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment program.

Israel and the US have continued to pummel Iran’s nuclear sites
Israel and the US have continued to pummel Iran’s nuclear sites (AFP/Getty)

“There has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. The entrances to the underground facilities that were bombed have been buried and shuttered with cement,” Gabbard’s opening remarks stated.

Trump’s artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency czar David Saks caused alarm Monday when he suggested that Israel could escalate the war “by contemplating using a nuclear weapon.”

The president insisted that “Israel would never do that” when asked about the comments later by reporters.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

41Comments

Conversation

|

All Comments

    1. Comment by TogetherWeStand.

      Trump is trapped like the RAT he is, and he has run out of options short of admitting it was all a big mistake for his master in Israel! But don't just think Russia is going to stand by and see their gas and oil supply come to a halt.

      • Comment by AlistairD.

        "You're playing with World War Three"...

        • Comment by Poe.

          Makes it clearer why those senators spoke out about disobeying immoral orders.

          • Comment by bloodwort.

            The most likely user of a nuclear weapon is Israel. The Israelis desperately want a broken and devastated Iran, so that they can be the regional hegemonic power, and basically do what they want, without the backing of the US. If they find themselves in a situation where they seriously feel under threat, then they could use a nuke.

            • Comment by stillaardvark2.

              I don’t see this out of the question.

              All this terrible scenario started because Israel has nuclear weapons and has become a law unto itself

              Could easily decide to end it using such and at the same time demonstrate the power of its God!

              • Reply by Poe.

                I thought you wanted to differ?

                Us Christianity or Roman Christianity. Judaism, Islam. These are the ideas people are killing in the name of.

                Sky fairies? Shall we keep it grounded.

                Regional differences you say- Geography is innocent.

                National pride is fine. Backed up with a 'one true god lie' and it becomes killer joke.

              • Reply by Poe.

                Not so many pagan armies are there....

            • Comment by commonsense.

              Certainly no reason for Israel or America to use nuclear weapons against this weak Iran regime

              America has the option of doing the houtis option ie leave and

              Israel does maintenance

              The Iranian regime placed cluster bombs in ballistic missiles thus reducing the explosive power but perfect for a scattering of radiation by dirty bombs..but now the manufacturing and production of this is complicated by war

              • Reply by Midgeslayer.

                subscriber

                Netenyahooo has lots of reasons to favour a never ending war eg like a never beginning trial for corruption. So if a nuclear bomb is needed keep things ticking over, do you really think he wouldn't

              • Reply by Chaos4700.

                subscriber

                What will happen to you if your government does use a nuclear weapon? And to your children?

            • Comment by The Sage.

              But all the pro islamist trolls claim that Iran wasn't producing a nuclear bomb, despite years of producing the required material.

              • Reply by arco iris.

                subscriber

                Not true.

              • Reply by Chaos4700.

                subscriber

                The WHO is preparing for a victimized Iran, not an aggressive one.

                Israel will be to blame.

            • Comment by PickledPink.

              Even the illegal wider scale nuclear bombing of Iran would not achieve its goal of stopping further retaliatory attacks as the Persian’s underground facilities are mostly impervious. All it would do is kill countless civilians and irradiate the whole region and further afield. Food and water for billions would be affected and the US and Israel would be cancelled worldwide. They’d forever be global pariahs. Iran likely has a final ‘dead hand’ which would make life miserable for the perpetrators of this apocalyptic farce.

              • Reply by Copeycat1.

                China is years behind in capabilities to successfully take Taiwan the Americans made Iranian air defence capability look useless the Chinese use the same stuff .

              • Reply by Chaos4700.

                subscriber

                Iran didn't prepare extensively for air defense since they knew it was pointless. I'd look at how poorly US air defense is performing, especially with how expensive it is.

            • Hidden comment.

              Your avatar
              • Reply by commonsense.

                Go tell the gulf arab states

              • Reply by Chaos4700.

                subscriber

                The Gulf states know who started this war they got pulled into.

            • Comment by Noseplus.

              subscriber

              What regime is going to be replaced first, Trump's or the Iranians.A half attempt by the Republicans to 'retire' Trump in favour of a re-constituted Vance could get them enough popularity to hang on.That's what 'Checks and Balances' mean.

              Thank you for registering

              Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in