×
all 98 comments

[–]blizmd 101 points102 points  (16 children)

Jersh Moon is a hero for the cause of freedom of speech on the internet. No, I’m not joking.

[–]roolb 46 points47 points  (7 children)

I'm thinking of throwing in my $20. It's an important principle.

[–]StevenAssantisFoot 42 points43 points  (6 children)

I actually did it. Fuck people who throw their weight and influence around because they've been personally offended. Jones deserves to be sued and deserves to lose. KF is not a nice website but they are the only ones keeping track of some real pieces of shit. There are a lot of animal abusers and pedophiles out there that would be overjoyed if KF disappeared. Fuck them too. $20 a month is not a lot for me and it's a cause I feel is worth supporting.

[–]Throwawayfichelper 36 points37 points  (4 children)

Kiwis are actually tangibly responsible for putting several massive animal abusers in prison. You can't deny they have done some good. And that deserves to remain visible for everyone to see. People deserve to know the truth about these assholes, where otherwise their connections, bribery and harassment campaigns would get their internet record wiped clean.

The farms is so important for the future of internet anti-censorship battles. Thank you for helping. I donated to the legal fund yesterday.

[–]Real_RobinGoodfellow 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Wait is that true? About the animal abusers? Where can I read more about this?

[–]Consistent_Cream_760 16 points17 points  (1 child)

It is true, but if you wanted to learn more it's on the Kiwi Farms. This is the issue at hand. The KF is not a pure evil site just sets out to hurt people. It just lacks the heavy handed censorship that is forced on the rest of the world. But it's blocked nearly everywhere so of course you'll never see when they catch animal abusers because you're not allowed to know. LFJ doesn't want you to know that he r*ped someone. That's why he's so invested. No other website would allow its users to publicly expose dirty laundry like the Kiwi Farms.

If you were to browse the Kiwi Farms you may want to start with the Zoosadist board where they are tracking these kinds of people.

[–]Throwawayfichelper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for answering in my stead. You put it well. I'll reply to them as well with another thread.

[–]Throwawayfichelper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The other commenter put it well, and i appreciate the suggestion of the zoosadist board as that's where all the info is aggregated. However for a quick, specific example of one of many arrests, i'd like to direct you to the "Million Pity - Baby Monkey Hate" thread. I will warn you though that it is a cruel reality being shown, so please don't force yourself to look more than you need to.

If you understand how the url structure works (as links outright are banned across reddit) you can find the specific post of a major arrest at page-236#post-17755255

If that does not work somehow, search for the term "machine translated" within the thread, and it is the second result at post 4702.

[–]dog_in_a_dress 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are a lot of animal abusers and pedophiles out there that would be overjoyed if KF disappeared.

Literally so many that would never have any lasting accountability without the forum

[–]onforpo 46 points47 points  (4 children)

There was a quote that defending civil rights and defending scoundrels often go hand in hand or something.

[–]Marci_1992 45 points46 points  (3 children)

In another age the ACLU would be backing KF but those days are long gone.

[–]CrazyOnEwe 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Will FIRE handle this sort of case?

[–]redditthrowaway1294 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have to assume he's asked them. I think the EFF basically bailed out if I am remembering correctly.
I pitched in a few hundred dollars back when he originally opened the donations. Might chuck another few from my tax refund.

[–]dog_in_a_dress 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Um they're kinda busy rn. They have too many sex offenders who have realized they absolutely need to be in women's prisons rn. 

[–]LilacLands 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I agree.

[–]YouCanCallMeAIJolson 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Jersh Moon is a hero for the cause of freedom of speech on the internet. No, I’m not joking.

Unironically true

[–]1981_Ballz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not as principled as one would hope (still rooting for him over Fong-Jones).

[–]Qat11 26 points27 points  (2 children)

Joshua Moon is an honest and modest man who genuinely cares about freedom on the internet. You can hate on his website and question its morality, but he does care about the principles that enable it.

[–]Imaginary-Award7543 15 points16 points  (0 children)

He constantly says the most insane racist shit though. He's not modest either. I'd say he's a total dickhead.

But, he does defend his website on the principles (and law!) of free speech and that's a good thing.

[–]reddonkulo [score hidden]  (0 children)

One thing I always remember about Josh Moon, I recall years back he posted something on KF stating sites like Twitter were silencing anyone (iirc he specifically said women) critical of trans ideology, and due to that these critics and questioners were coming to KF to express themselves.

(I'd add and ovarit as well as KF.)

Moon's statement made enough of an impression on me at the time I copied and saved it but now cannot find it. Would've made this comment so much better if I had. As I recall it was written in an accusatory tone toward those vilifying KF but also not letting certain topics or criticisms be discussed elsewhere.

I am not a KF user or fan, particularly, but when X was Twitter and social media were clamping down on anything trans critical I would visit at times to check in on the likes of Grace Lavery and Gretchen Felker Martin. Nowadays I look maybe quarterly at the Patrick S. Tomlinson thread.

Well TL;DR but KF should exist. I'm glad 'keffals' failed in their effort to kill the site and am glad Liz Fong Jones hasn't succeeded either.

[–]GreenOrkGirl 24 points25 points  (1 child)

If she (he? whatever?) just GTFOd from KF, no one would ever mention the "consent incident" or anything related. It would be just forgotten as most of Internet drama is forgotten in a couple days, but no, LFJ must persist to stay in our collective memmory.

[–]HadakaApron 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The accusation wasn't even public when LFJ made the "consent accident" tweet, it was one of the biggest foot-in-mouth moments I've ever seen on the internet.

[–]TigerBelmont 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting.

[–]tearsofscrutiny 37 points38 points  (2 children)

The KF eps are what brought me in to the podcast fold (I know they were very divisive and the factuality of some of the content has not held up). I don't use the site any more but it's still an important resource that would be sorely missed. I'm not giving any money but I will stand in solidarity with moon et al, for whatever that's worth.

Thanks for cross posting this announcement OP, as I said I don't use the site anymore so this would have totally flown under my radar. I'm shocked LFJ is still at it. Get a life!

[–]LilacLands 24 points25 points  (1 child)

Jesse’s tour de force two-parter on the KF saga remains my favorite B&R episode of all time!! I remember tearing up laughing at work listening to him recounting his comms with the Irish kid.

I need to re-listen because it’s been a few years now! I’m also not fully up to date on KF -my last big “update” was I think Heterodorx interviewing Josh. What didn’t hold up from Jesse’s reporting?! Well besides the media insanity making a huge deal of banning “dangerous” KF from the internet…then quietly failing to notice / ignoring the fact that the banning never happened and everyone was fine hahaha. At the time of Jesse’s episodes I think there was still a lot of uncertainty about whether it really could be wiped off the internet.

[–]tearsofscrutiny 9 points10 points  (0 children)

IIRC the Irish kid ended up not being in actuality who they claimed to be, they weren't actually behind the Keffals kerfuffle. But it's been a minute and I may be misremembering

[–]onthewingsofangels 61 points62 points  (24 children)

This is so disappointing. 

I don't know Fong-Jones, but we overlapped at Google a lifetime ago. She was one of the employees leading the crusade against Google Plus's Real Names policy (remember that failed product?!), emphasizing the importance of anonymity on the Internet. The famous cartoon "on the Internet no one knows you're a dog" was held up as an ideal. Back then she understood that anonymity enabled free speech, and free speech was a key cornerstone of the Internet, and most critical for the most vulnerable. 

To see her morphing from the old school tech idealist into this crusader for everything she once railed against is saddening. 

[–]Foreign-Discount- 55 points56 points  (10 children)

Consent accidents change people.

[–]Real_RobinGoodfellow 4 points5 points  (9 children)

What’s the tldr on this consent accident

ETA nvm I have educated myself on the matter. Omg. Everybody involved with that is Insane.

[–]Foreign-Discount- 6 points7 points  (7 children)

[–]throwawayxzcp 11 points12 points  (5 children)

That REALLY sounds like he's covering up committing a rape.

[–]Successful-Dream-698 2 points3 points  (1 child)

i don't know. i kind of fall on the story being so crazy it has to be true. and we know very that these people would go out there and say that someone accidentally getting dog hair on them was the same as a ski mask parking lot alice sebold special.

[–]throwawayxzcp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're of course free to believe what you like, but his whole explanation, in my view, can be summarized as, "I'm being accused of rape / SA. But I can assure you that the sex part was all totally 100% consensual, she's not upset because of my doing anything sexual to her without her consent, it was... uh... the DOG HAIR! Yeah, that's the ticket! THE DOG HAIR DID IT, NOT ME! IT WAS ALL THE DOG HAIR'S FAULT!"

His story strains credibility so much that it's practically see-through, pun intended.

[–]Real_RobinGoodfellow 3 points4 points  (2 children)

… does it?! I read it entirely differently, it sounded like the other person was completely insane

[–]throwawayxzcp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We're getting exactly one side of the story here (his), but it sounds to me that he was being publicly accused of rape/SA and thought that he could get out ahead of it by creating a narrative that said, "Yeah, everything was totally consensual, except she freaked out when she saw dog hair on me."

I think this was his panicked and ham-handed attempt to muddy the waters once he realized that the allegation was out there... I've seen too many other men say and do similar things to try to impeach the credibility of their accuser in advance to not have the same read on this situation.

[–]Foreign-Discount- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We've only gotten it from Liz"s point of view. Painting the victim as insane wouldn't be unusual.

[–]ButUncleOwen [score hidden]  (0 children)

Only marginally related, but can we please all agree to stop using “play” to refer to sex? It gives me the heebie jeebies 100% of the time.

[–]SkweegeeSEverything I Don't Like is Literally Fascism. 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“You can probably see where this is going…”

No, I really can’t.

[–]Centrist_gun_nut 37 points38 points  (4 children)

The zeitgeist of the whole internet has changed. There are no old school tech idealists left. They’re all 60 and retiring.

[–]UpvoteIfYouDare 5 points6 points  (3 children)

Tech killed the idealism, not time.

[–]onthewingsofangels 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Money killed the idealism. Money and power 

[–]Centrist_gun_nut 2 points3 points  (1 child)

This sounds like a good talking point, but it’s really not that simple. It’s really a story about social status, just like other institutions in the 2010s.

[–]onthewingsofangels 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Maybe. I think there is a big difference between the kind of people who were attracted to tech in the 90s and early 2000s - a well paying job for geeks, versus the ones who came in later - ambitious people aiming for a high paying progression. 

Both groups are smart, but the second category would equally have chosen law or finance in another time. While the first group grew up with idealistic views of tech and couldn't see themselves doing anything else. 

[–]QueenKamalaPaper Straw and Pitbull Hater 15 points16 points  (6 children)

Do you remember their farewell email

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 6 points7 points  (3 children)

I left before Fong-Jones. What was in the email?

[–]QueenKamalaPaper Straw and Pitbull Hater 15 points16 points  (2 children)

It was just a super dramatic company wide email

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Always had to be the center of attention, that one

[–]SkweegeeSEverything I Don't Like is Literally Fascism. 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Flounce

[–]onthewingsofangels 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No I don't! I do remember there were a few resignations back then, including in my org - someone quit and then quietly returned a few years later. 

[–]Successful-Dream-698 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to infongity and beyond!

[–]JPP132 21 points22 points  (2 children)

They irony is that the John "CURRENT YEAR" Oliver cultists that Katie and Jessie talked about on their episodes about Internet Neutrality absolutely do or would support this LFJ guy censoring and shutting down a free and open internet. Because intersectional equity or something.

[–]dog_in_a_dress 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe the John Oliver types just fear the day they end up there too

[–]Successful-Dream-698 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i've met john. he did a show on campus and i had to mind him for a couple hours. we went for chicken sandwiches at the jetsons sky grille or whatever it was called. he's as tall as he is narrow. he looks like a stick bug. have you seen the boy hamilton morris? the drug expert. they could be brothers. no, john is a smart guy. he does not buy this shit, and neither does the other jon.

[–]onforpo 15 points16 points  (2 children)

the j-man has even posted on the farms itself back in the day

I don't think that's true. Unless you consider jsingal69 to actually be Jesse.

[–]LilacLands 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I have this memory of him talking about posting there - but not because he’s on there shitposting (though Katie might be lol) but as part of investigating something where he states who he is and explains he’s looking for info on XYZ.

I could definitely be misremembering this and maybe he’s just posted questions crowdsourcing info about KF on Twitter or something like that.

Both he & Katie definitely use KF all the time for research though.

[–]i8apuppy[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I swear I remember this too! I wouldn't have said in the post otherwise. If I'm wrong I'll accept it.

Regardless, I still say this is pod relevant. There's even a thread on KF documenting "Jesse Singal Derangement Syndrome" for what it's worth.

[–]dog_in_a_dress 6 points7 points  (0 children)

but as long as the K*** Farms keeps records of his “Consent Accident”, he will never lose his sadistic motivation to try and dominate us.

It's crazy how many of these people claim they're upset by the site existing for more noble-sounding reasons when they are all primarily upset that receipts of their worst behavior have not disappeared. People get so shocked how the Epstein stuff was covered up and its like, why? Have you not seen what lengths many people with a history of SA, inappropriate interactions with minors, or crimes against women etc have gone to punish anyone who won't rug sweep? 

There's definitely issues to be had with stuff on KF but you should be suspicious of any people like LFJ who are THIS invested and dedicated in trying to take down the one place refusing to remove evidence of someone's wrongdoing even when threatened legally like this. There's a reason it's a forbidden place to even mention without getting banned on a lot of reddit. 

Why would a site with many subreddits dedicated to sharing depraved fetishes or links to sexual exploitation have so many mods that draw the line at mentioning KF?  

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 12 points13 points  (3 children)

I am out of the loop. What's up with kiwi farms? What kind of site is this?

[–]i8apuppy[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Well, without opening the whole can of worms, it's an unsavory message board primarily dedicated to documenting and laughing at "lolcows," defined as absurd, oversharing personalities on the internet. It is very un-PC in that slurs are allowed and all the ists/phobes are permitted to post.

Common targets are: Fat activists, Transgender people, E-thots, Streamers, Serial tweeters/the terminally online/reddit mods, Politicians of all stripes

...etc

As you can imagine, this has angered many a sacred cow amongst big tech. There have been absolutely unprecedented efforts in taking this site down as a result (getting Cloudflare to drop their protection, getting tier 1 ISPs to block them) bolstered by media smears accusing site users of harassment and swatting.

It's a political wildwest, the refuge of folks who've been banned from more mainstream sites like this one. It harbors everyone from 8chan to ovarit.

The person being sued here is a documented lolcow who would much prefer that his previous online activity be memoryholed. He's been trying to take the site down for years now and the most recent attempt is by abusing the DMCA process.

[–]sockyjo42 years of conceptual continuity 28 points29 points  (1 child)

It’s a snark site that has years-long threads making fun of various people

[–]i8apuppy[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Damn you said it way better than me lol

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 31 points32 points  (5 children)

Btw, I'm 80% confident that Liz Fong-Jones was the one who leaked the infamous Google Damore Memo. I've locked horns with her before, and she's a bad-faith actor if ever I met one.

[–]scriptkiddie1337 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Story time?

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 10 points11 points  (3 children)

I'll keep it short, cause I don't want to spend like 40 mins typing it all out:

Damore put together his infamous memo. The gist, if you don't know, was that inside Google, like many big engineering companies, there was a big push to get more women involved, out of the misguided belief that if things aren't 50:50, that's a problem. Damore's memo basically said "look at all this research showing that men and women have different interests; I think this is probably a big factor nobody's considering". This was foolish of him, because even though he's right, everyone can see that the progressives behind this effort aren't amenable to reason, and this is just a third rail.

Damore goes and shops his draft memo around to various corners of the company, soliciting feedback. I was one of the first people who got a chance to read it, and saw several versions. Feedback was what I said above: this isn't going to make people happy, but you are right.

At some point, the company's progressive activist core [1] noticed this, and blew it up, making a big deal within the company. Management noticed, but their policy at that time was to basically ignore it and let it boil over, since the progressives were more or less always making a stink, and it was only a matter of time until something else came along to be the new thing.

Unhappy to see that management wasn't heeding their calls to have Damore publicly flogged, they leaked an earlier draft of the memo to the press (Buzzfeed, if my memory serves correctly). Because this was done in bad faith, they edited the memo first, mostly to remove graphs, citations, and other evidence so as to give the appearance that Damore was simply pulling stuff out of his ass, as opposed to this being carefully research, and evidence-backed.

Now that it was causing a national news cycle [2], management felt they had to do something. So they fired Damore for "causing strife among employees" (or some similar reasoning). Since he didn't leak it, they couldn't use that justification. Of course, the activists who spread the memo from being tentatively shared with a small group to plastering it on every wall? Were they punished? No, of course not.

So how am I so sure it's Fong-Jones? She was either the first or second to try blowing up the memo internally. She was the champion of calling for Damore's head. When the leak was published [3], Buzzfeed included interview commentary from her. Fong-Jones had spoken w/o company permission to the press repeatedly, and there were other leaked documents that also somehow came to be associated with her too [4].

I do sometimes wonder why HR didn't crack down on her. It's possible they sent warnings and she flagrantly ignored them. That said, HR was also the one pushing the 50:50 ratio being a goal-that's-never-explicitly-stated-because-that-would-actually-be-illegal. Having dealt with Google on several sensitive subjects, they were (at that time) very sensitive to be seen trying to shut down any conversations, and for any hot-button debate, they would have a preferred party they would silently root for. In this case, that party was the activists, up until the leak, and then they went and fired Damore to make it look (to the NYT-reading public) like they'd done something. If nobody had leaked it, they would've ignored it.

Okay, this did end up being 40 mins. Ah well.

PS - While typing this out, I thought of one other Fong-Jones anecdote. Somebody put together, presumably for whichever month is supposed to be for women's history, a big stylized posterboard with various notable female employees on it. Fong-Jones was on this list, because it was produced by some progressive sympathetic to the activists. The funny thing is that each person's picture had their name, and their notable accomplishment. Things like inventing new technologies, launching well-known products, and the like. What did Fong-Jones do to justify inclusion? She was labeled "SRE extraordinaire". A site reliability engineer (SRE) is just a job role. Do you really think that she was just so good at her job to deserve accolades from among the company's thousands of SREs? No, she was put there because the list-creator was a progressive who liked her activism, but knew that highlighting her habit of talking to the press w/o permission and causing a fuss internally wasn't something they should be announcing on a poster.

---

[1] I call them a "core" because they were organized, had their chat servers outside of the company, and so on. When they'd get on about something or other, they would coordinate things like posting / upvoting questions for the company all-hands, leaving comments and making memes to push the target agenda, and so on. On one delightful occasion, while I was parrying them in the internal listserv, they sent some rando to try distracting me with emails attempting to concern troll me. The funny bit is when I called him out for only being there to attempt to waste my time, he admitted to it. Like yo, if you're going to be a bad-faith actor, you got to commit to the lie!

[2] Google's employee training material tries dissuading people from making brash statements internally, asking menacingly how you would feel if it ended up on the front page of the New York Times. The problem with this strategy was that there were too many employees who would regard this as a badge of honor. I wanted to, but never got around to, suggest to HR that they update the guideline to be "NYT or Breitbart", so that the activists at least would think twice.

[3] For completeness, I will add that a copy of the memo was also leaked to Breitbart. I am 90% sure of who that is, but it's a name nobody would recognize because this individual feared for their career and never gave comments to the press. Why did they do it? Because they wanted a copy with the graphs / citations attached so that the public record would be complete.

[4] There's another story about an AI ethics board, but that's for another time.

[–]scriptkiddie1337 1 point2 points  (2 children)

That's a very insightful read. I would also like to ask, what was the talk around the office about this 'consent accident?'

[–]BeABetterHumanBeing 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That's a good question, and I would guess that you'd have to go to kiwi farms to look it up.

[–]scriptkiddie1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already have though admittedly I haven't got through the whole thread

[–]YouCanCallMeAIJolson 14 points15 points  (5 children)

I would bet all my money that LFJ has three letter agency connections

[–]Equivalent-Gold-9213 8 points9 points  (1 child)

He does, at least by degrees of separation. He worked on an ICE/border control project before and has connections to other people who have worked in the NSA/DARPA sphere.

[–]mcantrell 3 points4 points  (2 children)

You're thinking of the sociopaths at Path Networks. Different lolcow, likely just as dangerous a sociopath.

[–]YouCanCallMeAIJolson 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Working for Google, Trans, and trying to shut down free speech? I'm thinking this glows

[–]Imaginary-Award7543 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Or just rich and bitter. Easiest explanation.

[–]EloeOmoe 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Just counter sue for malicious prosecution? DMCA sucks but it is very specific. Public head shots and social media posts don't cut it.

[–]i8apuppy[S] 20 points21 points  (1 child)

Did you read the post? Lolcow is the one suing and is seeking a declaratory judgement.

[–]EloeOmoe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I skimmed it and caught the part about DMCA abuse and fundraising for legal fees, so jumped to conclusions.

[–]New-Anybody-6206 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter what they claim or how much it "doesn't cut it", the rules are that content under DMCA claims must be removed immediately... and the only recourse for getting it back always involves doxxing yourself. That's the abuse angle they're doing.

[–]thefloridabarsucks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The civil tort of malicious prosecution is mostly speculative, outside of a post-conviction context. It technically exists but from what I've read it's still mostly linked with maliciously causing criminal prosecution.

[–][deleted] -33 points-32 points  (20 children)

I am aware what Kiwi Farm is and I don’t think they are relevant anymore.

Hilarious to see how fascist democrats can be sometimes. They are worse than Trump and that’s saying something.

Democratic Party should’ve been dismantled long time ago because they are just as bad as Republicans if not worse.

[–]branks4nothing 33 points34 points  (3 children)

I am aware what Kiwi Farm is and I don’t think they are relevant anymore.

KF will be relevant as long as there is online censorship and ill-faith actors scrubbing history.

[–]i8apuppy[S] 12 points13 points  (14 children)

You are incredibly incorrect. I just wanted to make sure at least one person made you aware of that.

[–][deleted]  (13 children)

[deleted]

    [–]i8apuppy[S] 13 points14 points  (11 children)

    I'm not a democrat. Go play with your blocks now.

    **nice edit. Og comment called me a dem and sucked off trump.

    [–]Alma-Elma 6 points7 points  (1 child)

    You'll be timed out for the comment (unless you edit out the "incivility" before the mods see it) but before that I wanted to say: you're right.

    [–]i8apuppy[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

    Alright lol. I made a modest edit. And thank you.

    [–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (8 children)

    Sure you aren’t, little kid. Go and play with rainbow community and embarrassing pronounce stuff lol

    [–]i8apuppy[S] 9 points10 points  (7 children)

    "I'm not owned..I'm not crying!"

    You're a literal soyjak. Get an outdoor hobby, bud. It'll do wonders.

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

    Sorry but you should take your own advice bud. I am sure the rainbow community will welcome you to the group lol

    [–]i8apuppy[S] 8 points9 points  (5 children)

    Yes, as someone boosting kiwi farms I'm surely welcome in the rainbow brigade.

    Unironically, wtf are you doing in this sub and conversation?

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

    Lol sure you are dude

    [–]i8apuppy[S] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

    Good trolling, my man. You had me for a minute.

    Although stop editing your comments constantly. That's cheap.

    [–]SoftandChewyFirst generation mod[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Insulting other users with epithets is not allowed on this sub. You are suspended for one week for this breach of the rules.

    [–]Imaginary-Award7543 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

    I think KF is going to lose this. DMCA absolutely sucks but KF is purposely not complying with the law by not taking down the material upon request. I think the DMCA is broken and also that Fong-Jones is misusing it in all the ways that are described above, but none of that matters if they lose because of this dumb decision.