[–] ▶ №262193[Quote]>>262196
also he calls everyone that doesnt like his lolis projecting
▶ №262196[Quote]
>>262193Actual branigger behavior geg
▶ №262197[Quote]
Disgusting mustardcreature needs to be executed
▶ №262202[Quote]
>>262198But saar babyjak is actually a adult o algo
▶ №262204[Quote]>>262206
just realized i can't see actual nsfw posts on the 'ru because i don't have an account geg
▶ №262205[Quote]
I am sure that if mustard would have been in 2022 xhe would defend 'lita only for own da Soycucks
▶ №262206[Quote]
>>262204They added a filter, and as soon as it was added some NIGGER flooded the 'log with Soytan porn that was taken from rule34
▶ №262208[Quote]>>262209
Hide the post above me
▶ №262209[Quote]
>>262208Xhe clittyleak for the true kek
▶ №262214[Quote]
supersaging so the babyjak porn is 'wiped
▶ №262218[Quote]
Which nigger janny bumped it without replying?
▶ №262266[Quote]
he's gone, good
▶ №262269[Quote]>>262271
yes mustard it's worsting admin ever
▶ №262272[Quote]
>>262271accidental supersage
▶ №262302[Quote]>>262304>>262306
The worst part is his defense:
>The sexualized babyjaks are meant to poke fun at puritans who think everything is 'p. Since no one actually goons to sexualized babyjaks, it's okay to post them. This contrasts with 'lita since actual pedos goon to it and post it seriously. No one posts babyjaks with a sexual intent.
>puritans
He just sounds like your average Twitter pedo
▶ №262304[Quote]>>262306
>>262302Every time i see someone complaining on /soy/ he gets HTSMquoted immediatly and the reppies defending what he is complaining about are always
>YOU IS DA NUSOI FO WANTING THE SITE TO IMPROVEWhich basically means they want us to be submissive little fucks that don't say anything about THEIR errors and adapt to what they created.
▶ №262306[Quote]>>262307
>>262302>>262304The current objective of the administration is to make /soy/ another /b/, that's why they encourage users to normalize soyjak porn
>Is not porn because uhh… Not everyone is going to goon to itReminds me to the Xitter spic failtrolls
▶ №262307[Quote]>>262312
>>262306Also kinda acts like Braniggers with the use of the term "puritan" as is being a moralGOD who doesn't want to watch porn 24/7 on the bald man with glasses site was bad
▶ №262317[Quote]
>>262316Both are Bad, retard
>Muh if You complain about mustard administración You want to be here in the 2022 shardee ▶ №262320[Quote]>>262322
>>262316Both are bad, not because X is worse than Y it means X has to be tolerated since following that logic ends up with increasingly worse things
▶ №262321[Quote]>>262323
In conclution puriteens WON
▶ №262322[Quote]>>262324>>262325>>262327>>262328
>>262320>this website was bad then>this website is bad now even though it's nowhere near as bad as then>but I will never never never never never ever leave you tiktok immigrants are something else
Yeah, mustard is bad, bad for rangebanning you spics only on /soy/ and not the entirety of the site
mustard if you can hear me, do what needs to be done, nothing of value will be lost I can assure you
▶ №262324[Quote]
>>262322Very obvious mustard sockpuppet
▶ №262325[Quote]
>>262322The glaze is crazy bro
▶ №262327[Quote]
>>262322>Confusing Quote actions with Mustard ones>Boiling frog mentalitySmartest VPajeetN award
▶ №262329[Quote]>>262330
>>262328I saw the fail cocomelon forums immigrant
This thread is getting you all banned btw
▶ №262332[Quote]>>262334
>>262331Fallacy, a picture is no the same that porn
▶ №262334[Quote]>>262336>>262345
>>262332>a picture is no the same ESL babble, at least learn how to talk before attempting to sound smart, lmao
▶ №262336[Quote]
>>262334Esl owns You, mustardfag
▶ №262345[Quote]>>262346
>>262334youre on the esl board what do you except subhuman pig nigger fauilure
▶ №262346[Quote]>>262347>>262348>>262357
>>262345The only real esl spic on here is thar one mexican
Most spics on here know English to a good degree
▶ №262348[Quote]
>>262346yeah but we are all esl here so he shouldnt except perfect grammar
▶ №262364[Quote]
While I like bullying puritans it would be nice if we could do it in a way that doesn't involve spewing the liquid shit that is drawn pornagraphy of a character that is generally considered a child on the board.
▶ №262374[Quote]
>>262371First it was the site filling with the futamulticolored crap, last week it was Mustard approving soytan porn, this week was the whole babyjak porn thing and I wonder what is the Quotecord going to do next week. As we all know this is 100% intentional and happened right after the obsessed zelligpedo of Quote banned (most) soycacas
▶ №262377[Quote]
test
