HOMEMADE CYANIDE
Cyanide is the granddaddy of synthetic poisons. Easily made from common chemicals, cyanideis used as is for poisoning bullets and food, and is used in the making of Hydrogen Cyanide,Cyanogen Chloride, Tabun, and numerous other poison gases. A dose as small as 50 milligrams (ingested) can kill an adult man. Of course, the more thebetter.To make cyanide, you must first make ferrocyanide. This can either be made, or preferably,bought.
Ferrocyanide Preparation
Ferrocyanide is obtained by heating 10 parts (by weight) potassium (or sodium) carbonate; 10parts coke. cinders, or coal; and 3 parts iron turnings, all in coarse powder. to a full red heat inan open crucible, stirring occasionally until small jets of purple flame arc no longer seen. Whencool, the soluble matter is dissolved out of it, the solution filtered, evaporated, and crystallized.The crystals obtained are redissolved in hot water and cooled very slowly, forming large yellowcrystals of the ferrocyanide.In order to obtain a pure form, melt dried ferrocyanide in a glass vessel and let cool, dissolvethe fused mass in water, neutralize any excess of alkali with acetic acid (vinegar), andprecipitate the salt by adding strong alcohol to the solution. Wash the precipitate with a littleweak alcohol, redissolve it in water, and crystallize.Sodium Ferrocyanide (Na4Fe(CN)6-10H2O, FW 484.07, mp 82C, CAS# 13601-19-9, AKAYellow Prussiate of Soda) can be ordered quite cheaply from www.sciencealliance.com.Catalog #s and prices are: C7435-100 100g $4.12, C7435-500 500g $8.96. And there's nohazardous shipping fees for it either. Cyanide costs about $47 a pound plus $15 hazardous.
Cyanide Preparation
To convert the ferro to cyanide do this (please note that these instructions were for thepotassium not sodium salt. I'm assuming that the ratios are similar for both); Mix thoroughly 8parts of dry sodium ferrocyanide and 3 parts dry sodium carbonate (pool pH adjuster), heatthem in a steel container (cleaned oil filter can works nicely), with constant stirring (use clotheshanger, straightened out), with a propane torch or other intense heat source till it melts into aclear liquid. Heating is continued until the mix no longer fizzes and the fluid portion is colorless. After a few minutes rest, to allow the contents to settle, the clear portion is poured from theheavy black sediment (iron) at the bottom at the bottom of the crucible and onto to a clean slabor steel bowl. It's then broken up while still warm and stored in airtight bottles. This will be
7-8 before precipitation as this gives better recovery and greater non-toxic nitrogen removal.The pH was raised to this value by using NaOH or Na2CO3 the latter being preferred. Thebase used was quite dilute in order to prevent detoxification due to high local concentrations inthe solution. A 5% solution of NaOH was used, whereas with Na2CO3 a 12% solution waspreferred.In general, this higher pH during precipitation gave a greater non-toxic nitrogen fractionationand at the same time maintained the toxin loss at less than 2%. After precipitation, the slurrywas filtered using from 1 to 4% filter aid, based on slurry weight, for satisfactory filtration, theamount of filter aid needed being dependent on the type of press used. Washing the filter cakewith Na2SO4 solution removed additional non-toxic nitrogen which is desirable. In this washingstep a 16.7% solution of Na2SO4 was again used. This washing step removed an additional15% of non-toxic nitrogen from the cake. After filtration the filter cake which contains the ricin in combination with the Na2SO4 may bedried and slurried with CCl4 to separate the ricin by flotation. Separation of the ricin after asingle precipitation and washing step is possible, but it is preferred to carry the process throughan additional extraction and precipitation step. This is accomplished by slurrying the filter cakein three times its weight of water and the pH of the slurry is again brought to 3.8+-.1 by meansof 5% H2SO4 The slurry is filtered and a second precipitation is brought about by addingNa2SO4 solution. Although pH control here is not wholly essential it is advantageous to bringthe pH to approximate neutrality by adding 12% Na2CO3. A precipitation time of 45 minutes was necessary to obtain complete removal of the toxin. Infiltering out the precipitate, no filter aid was used and the filter cake was washed with Na2S04solution on the filter whereby an additional amount of non-toxic nitrogen was removed from thecake. This washing was effective only the first time and repeated washings had little effect inremoving further non-toxic nitrogen.The ricin-Na2SO4 precipitate was dried at about 50" to 60" C. on a hot air tray dryer. The driedproduct was ground to pass a 40 mesh screen and agitated with 5 times its weight of CCl4which served the separate the ricin from the Na2SO4 by flotation. After settling. the ricin wasskimmed off the top. This reduced the Na2SO4 content of the mixture from a previous 40 to50% down to 15 to 18%. About 1 to 2% of nitrogen remained in the Na2SO4 salt which couldthen be used for subsequent precipitations.The final precipitation produced a particle size of 1-2 mu. On drying the wet cake, however, thericin cemented together forming larger particles. These could not be broken down to their original size by ordinary grinding methods and since a very line particle size was necessary inorder that the product might be used as a toxic weapon, it was thought desirable to seek somemethod to prevent the agglomeration or cementing process that took place on drying.To attempt lo affect this result, physical conditions prevailing under the precipitation processwere changed. This included changing the temperature of precipitation and the rate of agitation.Other changes included precipitation with only partial saturation of Na2SO4 and the use of wetting and seeding agents. None of these expedients produced any significant improvement inparticle size. Ordinary dry ball and hammer milling of the dried ricin produced considerabledetoxification perhaps due to the generation of excess heat. The use of CCl4 slurry plus the
use of low temperature and low moisture content of the ricin reduced detoxification during ballmilling.Spray drying proved to be an even better method of securing a reasonably small particle size.Best results were achieved by using a solution having about 20% solids, an inlet temperature of 150" C. and an atomizing air pressure of 150 to 180 p.s.i. The particle size secured was 6 to 8mu.The best means of securing a small particle size was by air grinding. This was carried out in anapparatus having a chamber with conical top and bottom. The material to be ground has beenfed into this chamber and is withdrawn from the bottom and forced back into the center of thechamber tangentially through a venturi. Compressed air of about 100 p.s.i. was fed to theventuri to provide the grinding force. The fines are drawn off the top and the large particlessettle to the bottom to be recirculated and reground. This process produced particles having amass median diameter of 2.5 to 3.5 mu.Numerous variations are possible in the several steps of the process commencing with thewater extraction and precipitation which may be a single or multiple step. Although a singleextraction step can be used, as indicated before, some process modifications are necessary for its successful operation on a plant scale. Double extraction proved to be quite efficient butadditional steps beyond the second extraction step were not found necessary. The drawing isself-descriptive and shows the various steps of the process described.
References Cited in this patent:Kabat et al.: J. Biol. Chem., vol. 168, 1947, pages 629-39 .Kunitz et al.: J. Gen. Physiol, vol. 32 (1948), pages 25-31.