CASE SCENARIOS ON
EXPERTISE THROUGH
QUALIFICATIONS
EXPERTISE
EXPERTISE & SPECIALIZATION
Qualifications allow a person to become an expert in a
specialized area of study, with the recognition of their expertise
reaffirmed through their formal degree.
Various specialized fields require a tertiary degree as a starting
point for a person to be considered an expert in that field.
CASE SCENARIOS:
NO SPECIALIZATION
IN AREAS REQUIRING
QUALIFIED EXPERTISE
CASE SCENARIO A:
THE PORTFOLIO
MANAGER
A Portfolio Manager manages the finances of
a complex. The Portfolio Manager’s highest
education is high school. In the complex, a
dispute arises regarding the boundaries of a
piece of land. The Portfolio Manager sends
emails to everyone in the complex asserting
what the Portfolio Manager thinks is the
boundaries of the land in dispute.
Is the Portfolio Manager allowed to give
opinion about land boundaries?
The Portfolio Manager cannot give opinion about land
boundaries as that is expertise reserved for land surveyors
who practice within the discipline of land surveying.
To become a land surveyor, one must first complete a higher
degree in land surveying and get professional registration to
practice in that discipline.
CASE SCENARIO B:
THE ORTHOPEDIC
SURGEON
An Orthopedic Surgeon is convinced that
a property does not belong to his
neighbor. The Orthopedic Surgeon
makes claims that the neighbor “drew
lines” to gain ownership of the property
and refuses to accept registered
government documents proving the
neighbor’s legal rights to the property.
Can the Orthopedic Surgeon continue to
push his opinion of his neighbor’s
property as if it’s a fact?
The Orthopedic Surgeon, who is a medical practitioner, cannot
give professional opinion about his neighbor’s property as that
would require a qualified property practitioner (who must rely
on official documents) and/or a professional land surveyor (if
boundaries are involved).
CASE
SCENARIO C:
THE
INVESTIGATOR
An Investigator and a Colleague are working on a case.
The Investigator’s highest education is a high school
diploma. The Colleague’s highest education is a
university degree in law. During an investigation meeting
between the two, the Investigator condescendingly
lectures the Colleague on law and makes remarks about
how the Investigator can “ramble about law for hours”
because the Investigator believes that the investigator is
an expert in law. Should the Investigator be considered
an expert in law?
As the Investigator did not complete a higher degree in law,
the Investigator cannot be considered an expert in law.
It’s inappropriate for the Investigator to act as if they’re more
knowledgeable than their Colleague who completed a
university degree in law.
CASE SCENARIO D: THE QUANTITY SURVEYOR
A Quantity Surveyor makes comments on a Professional Land Surveyor’s expert
opinion regarding the designation of a piece of land. The Quantity Surveyor
does not believe the Professional Land Surveyor’s opinion to be “legit”.
Is the Quantity Surveyor entitled to comment on a different discipline of
surveying?
As quantity surveying is a different discipline of surveying when
compared to land surveying, the Quantity Surveyor cannot comment on
the Professional Land Surveyor’s opinion, unless the Quantity Surveyor has
professional registration in the land surveying discipline.
CASE SCENARIO E:
THE
ANESTHESIOLOGIST
An Anesthesiologist insists that “disciplinary
action” be taken against another Attendee at
a homeowners’ meeting. The Anesthesiologist
works at a public hospital, does not have a
degree in the field of human resources, and
does not employee the services of the
Attendee they insisted should be subjected to
“disciplinary action”. Is the Anesthesiologist
out of line?
As the Anesthesiologist is not the Attendee’s employer (and clearly
does not have a human resources degree), then they cannot take any
“disciplinary action” against the Attendee whatsoever.
In closing:
If there is no degree, then
there should be no opinion on
matters requiring expertise.

Why Qualifications Matter: Real Case Scenarios Exposing the Limits of Unqualified Expertise

  • 1.
    CASE SCENARIOS ON EXPERTISETHROUGH QUALIFICATIONS
  • 2.
  • 3.
    EXPERTISE & SPECIALIZATION Qualificationsallow a person to become an expert in a specialized area of study, with the recognition of their expertise reaffirmed through their formal degree. Various specialized fields require a tertiary degree as a starting point for a person to be considered an expert in that field.
  • 4.
    CASE SCENARIOS: NO SPECIALIZATION INAREAS REQUIRING QUALIFIED EXPERTISE
  • 5.
    CASE SCENARIO A: THEPORTFOLIO MANAGER A Portfolio Manager manages the finances of a complex. The Portfolio Manager’s highest education is high school. In the complex, a dispute arises regarding the boundaries of a piece of land. The Portfolio Manager sends emails to everyone in the complex asserting what the Portfolio Manager thinks is the boundaries of the land in dispute. Is the Portfolio Manager allowed to give opinion about land boundaries?
  • 6.
    The Portfolio Managercannot give opinion about land boundaries as that is expertise reserved for land surveyors who practice within the discipline of land surveying. To become a land surveyor, one must first complete a higher degree in land surveying and get professional registration to practice in that discipline.
  • 7.
    CASE SCENARIO B: THEORTHOPEDIC SURGEON An Orthopedic Surgeon is convinced that a property does not belong to his neighbor. The Orthopedic Surgeon makes claims that the neighbor “drew lines” to gain ownership of the property and refuses to accept registered government documents proving the neighbor’s legal rights to the property. Can the Orthopedic Surgeon continue to push his opinion of his neighbor’s property as if it’s a fact?
  • 8.
    The Orthopedic Surgeon,who is a medical practitioner, cannot give professional opinion about his neighbor’s property as that would require a qualified property practitioner (who must rely on official documents) and/or a professional land surveyor (if boundaries are involved).
  • 9.
    CASE SCENARIO C: THE INVESTIGATOR An Investigatorand a Colleague are working on a case. The Investigator’s highest education is a high school diploma. The Colleague’s highest education is a university degree in law. During an investigation meeting between the two, the Investigator condescendingly lectures the Colleague on law and makes remarks about how the Investigator can “ramble about law for hours” because the Investigator believes that the investigator is an expert in law. Should the Investigator be considered an expert in law?
  • 10.
    As the Investigatordid not complete a higher degree in law, the Investigator cannot be considered an expert in law. It’s inappropriate for the Investigator to act as if they’re more knowledgeable than their Colleague who completed a university degree in law.
  • 11.
    CASE SCENARIO D:THE QUANTITY SURVEYOR A Quantity Surveyor makes comments on a Professional Land Surveyor’s expert opinion regarding the designation of a piece of land. The Quantity Surveyor does not believe the Professional Land Surveyor’s opinion to be “legit”. Is the Quantity Surveyor entitled to comment on a different discipline of surveying?
  • 12.
    As quantity surveyingis a different discipline of surveying when compared to land surveying, the Quantity Surveyor cannot comment on the Professional Land Surveyor’s opinion, unless the Quantity Surveyor has professional registration in the land surveying discipline.
  • 13.
    CASE SCENARIO E: THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST AnAnesthesiologist insists that “disciplinary action” be taken against another Attendee at a homeowners’ meeting. The Anesthesiologist works at a public hospital, does not have a degree in the field of human resources, and does not employee the services of the Attendee they insisted should be subjected to “disciplinary action”. Is the Anesthesiologist out of line?
  • 14.
    As the Anesthesiologistis not the Attendee’s employer (and clearly does not have a human resources degree), then they cannot take any “disciplinary action” against the Attendee whatsoever.
  • 15.
    In closing: If thereis no degree, then there should be no opinion on matters requiring expertise.