March 2026 SoyBooru conflict
This page is a candidate for deletion.
Reason: useless nigger war #772623414: not every shitty clitty leak needs a soyvil war page. it can stay if more than 2 people care fan about it.
If you disagree, please explain why at Talk:March 2026 SoyBooru conflict.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy. This page was last edited at 07:13, 12 March 2026 (EST)
Remember what links here before deleting.
|
Here be countrywars, namefags, slopjaks, and obsessed brimstone.
| > | Honestly I'll just reject any sexualized babyjak posts if I see them in the queue, they're most likely going to be untrashed by cumstard anyways. | < |
| User:MenstrualCykill[1][2] | ||
The March 2026 Soybooru Conflict is an ongoing conflict on the 'ru, concerning approval policies of posts, and what counts as "rule-breaking".
It all started with various SoyBooru admins such as Mustard and Cobblestone approving a series of posts depicting obese babyjaks wearing a bikini, something that many Booru users would deem as sexualisation of kids and would argue for its deletion, even with some moderators attempting to take these posts down.
Eventually, a janny called MenstrualCykill would announce that he would "reject any sexualized babyjaks in the queue" on the Shroom, which resulted in his initial demotion by Mustard[this has certainly never happened before].
Immediately after, emerald was promoted to replace him. Outrage ensued, as this aggravated perceived missteps in moderation of Mustard's administrative policies regarding what counts as "sexualizing a minor".
Mustard's perspective[edit | edit source]
CAUTION: POSSIBLE TRANNY PEDOPHILE(S) we still dont know what he meant by this but the statement is nonetheless concerning
The sexualized babyjaks are meant to poke fun at puritans who think everything is 'p. Since no one actually goons to sexualized babyjaks, it's okay to post them. This contrasts with Soylita since actual pedos goon to it and post it seriously. No one posts babyjaks with a sexual intent.
Snopes
| March 2026 SoyBooru conflict is part of a series on |
| Wars and Conflicts |
  
Wars on the 'ru and the Wiki [+]
Minor conflicts [+]
Miscellaneous [+]
|
|---|
