From left to right: Shohei Ohtani, Tarik Skubal, Cristopher Sánchez

From left to right: Shohei Ohtani, Tarik Skubal, Cristopher Sánchez Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Dilip Vishwanat, Emilee Chinn, Elsa / Getty Images

Ranking the top 2026 MLB starting fantasy pitchers with Stuff+ powered projections

Here’s a story about pitching in today’s game.

In 2020, baseball introduced a new tracking system that allowed teams to better track how the seams were actually spinning through space. Hawk-Eye’s camera system gave analysts new data, and that improved teams’ pitch quality metrics instantly, specifically for pitches where the movement and spin interacted in interesting ways. Seam-shifted wake was a newly understood phenomenon, and this new data, along with that understanding, produced stuff models that pointed prominently to a little-used pitch type as being undervalued.

That pitch type? The sweeper.

Advertisement

Pitchers had been throwing frisbee sliders before, but now teams could figure out what specific properties were best, and use that information to better scout and develop players. Not surprisingly, the league saw an influx of sweepers. Every year from 2020 to 2023, another 10,000 more sweepers were thrown during the season. It was the hot new pitch type.

But with every additional sweeper thrown, the hitters got better at seeing and hitting the pitch. The batting average on the pitch went up from .183 to .215 from 2020 to 2025, the slugging from .280 to .364. The chase rate went down. The in-zone swing rate went up. Hitters were being trained by seeing this pitch type more, and they responded.

Now pitchers are moving on to the kick-change, it seems.

Stuff+ is a model that’s supposed to tell teams “what inherent qualities make a pitch good.” But that’s a moving target in a league that’s constantly evolving, as the story of the sweeper shows. So those with pitch quality models are faced with decisions as the league moves forward — how much of the old data should be used to train today’s stuff metrics? How relevant is what happened in 2020 to the league in 2026?

To that end, Stuff+ has removed 2020 and 2021 from the training set for the model and added 2025, so that the question that Stuff+ is answering is “what makes a pitch good, now?” That reduces the metric’s power as a historical artifact, but it helps the model retain its ability to predict. Which is really where it shines anyway — a handful of pitches can tell you a lot about their quality, giving scouts, teams and fantasy players a jump on the competition with small-sample pitchers. Once the sample is larger, projections, which use and regress on-field results, become a more powerful weapon.

Advertisement

So, Stuff+ has been refreshed. Here are some of the biggest leaps forward in new Stuff+, which will be up on the pages of FanGraphs shortly.

Biggest Stuff+ gains in model refresh
PlayerS+S+ oldDiff
101
89
12
116
107
10
103
95
8
104
96
8
123
116
7
110
103
7
104
98
6
101
96
6
99
94
5
98
93
5

There are seven lefties on this list, so this could be an adjustment to the fact that lefty pitchers are seeing so much success right now. Otherwise, it’s relatively hard to classify this group and identify exactly why the Stuff+ model likes these guys more now, but at least in the case of Joey Cantillo, this is a good directional change that matches the scouting grades on his pitches better.

It’s not all good news. Sweepers, as a pitch type, saw their Stuff+ reduced as batters improved against them. So some pitchers lost Stuff+ in the update.

Biggest Stuff+ drops in model refresh

All righties, and more than a few of them who prominently use sweepers. In the past, Luis Severino’s overall Stuff+ grade was propped up by that pitch, in particular.

For the purposes of these rankings, Stuff+ by itself is most relevant to the freshest-faced hurlers in the group. Then I folded in things like strikeout-minus-walk rate, injury history (with Jeff Zimmerman’s injury grades shown), command (by Location+) and on-field results (thanks to Jordan Rosenblum’s OOPSY projections, which include a regressed Stuff+ under the hood). Last year’s ERA is somewhere on my spreadsheet but I generally don’t care what it was, because research has shown it’s not really predictive. We’ll be talking about these ranks all week on the Rates & Barrels podcast, with guests like Zimmerman and Rosenblum to help explain their participation.

My general bias is toward 15-team leagues with nine pitcher spots and no injury-list spots. This bias means I’ll sometimes favor quantity over injury-risk quality. You’ll find some injury-risk tiers in the rankings — if you have IL spots in your league, you’ll want to mentally move those guys up a bit. Because of the different rules when it comes to roster sizes and settings, you may want to look in the 70s, 80s and low 100s for sleepers, depending on the size of your league. Buy the younger guys over the older guys in those areas if you’re in a shallower league. There are some prospects and young guys who aren’t in their team’s top five here, but not many, so if you can handle waiting, move them up a little. In the blurbs, I tried to point out the cases where a player might not be useful in a certain type of league. Here’s a Google doc with more pitchers in it, though after 150, they aren’t really ranked as much as sorted and stashed for the future.

It’s difficult trying to put together one ranking for all sorts of different leagues, but at least this list will show you which pitchers I like, and which I think will regress. Happy hunting!

Expand all
Collapse all
1

Tarik Skubal

123 Stuff+
2.55 ppERA
Blurb Process
What is there to say about this power lefty coming off two straight Cy Young seasons that everyone doesn't know by now? How about a quick discussion of his health risk, that wet blanket that hangs over all pitchers in the game today. It's true that Tarik Skubal has had some injuries in the past, and that he throws hard (only three pitchers with 100+ innings last year had faster four-seamers), and that these things often lead to more injuries. But it's also true that, at 97.6 mph on the fastball, he sits a whopping five miles per hour under his maximum (the average difference is just under three). Having a large gap like that has been shown by peer-reviewed research to be less stressful on the arm. Good news for once.
Blurb Process
What is there to say about this power lefty coming off two straight Cy Young seasons that everyone doesn't know by now? How about a quick discussion of his health risk, that wet blanket that hangs over all pitchers in the game today. It's true that Tarik Skubal has had some injuries in the past, and that he throws hard (only three pitchers with 100+ innings last year had faster four-seamers), and that these things often lead to more injuries. But it's also true that, at 97.6 mph on the fastball, he sits a whopping five miles per hour under his maximum (the average difference is just under three). Having a large gap like that has been shown by peer-reviewed research to be less stressful on the arm. Good news for once.
What is there to say about this power lefty coming off two straight Cy Young seasons that everyone doesn't know by now? How about a quick discussion of his health risk, that wet blanket that hangs over all pitchers in the game today. It's true that Tarik Skubal has had some injuries in the past, and that he throws hard (only three pitchers with 100+ innings last year had faster four-seamers), and that these things often lead to more injuries. But it's also true that, at 97.6 mph on the fastball, he sits a whopping five miles per hour under his maximum (the average difference is just under three). Having a large gap like that has been shown by peer-reviewed research to be less stressful on the arm. Good news for once.
Stuff+
123
Location+
101
Pitching+
123
Health
87%
Proj. IP
189
ppERA
2.55
ppK%
30.9%
DET
2

Paul Skenes

110 Stuff+
2.74 ppERA
Blurb Process
When it comes to injury risk, Paul Skenes provides a fascinating foil to Tarik Skubal. Because while his health bill has largely been clean so far, he sits only 2 mph off of his maximum fastball velocity. But he still gets an "A" in the health department, as well as all the other departments. If he did lose a little bit of gas, what would happen to his four-seamer with boring shape that's already approaching league-average Stuff+? Probably wouldn't matter, it sounds like he's about to debut yet another pitch in his effort to break pitch tracking websites everywhere. Is the 'sleeper' — a slower sweeper — the next trend? Power, command and a wide arsenal: he's got everything.
Blurb Process
When it comes to injury risk, Paul Skenes provides a fascinating foil to Tarik Skubal. Because while his health bill has largely been clean so far, he sits only 2 mph off of his maximum fastball velocity. But he still gets an "A" in the health department, as well as all the other departments. If he did lose a little bit of gas, what would happen to his four-seamer with boring shape that's already approaching league-average Stuff+? Probably wouldn't matter, it sounds like he's about to debut yet another pitch in his effort to break pitch tracking websites everywhere. Is the 'sleeper' — a slower sweeper — the next trend? Power, command and a wide arsenal: he's got everything.
When it comes to injury risk, Paul Skenes provides a fascinating foil to Tarik Skubal. Because while his health bill has largely been clean so far, he sits only 2 mph off of his maximum fastball velocity. But he still gets an "A" in the health department, as well as all the other departments. If he did lose a little bit of gas, what would happen to his four-seamer with boring shape that's already approaching league-average Stuff+? Probably wouldn't matter, it sounds like he's about to debut yet another pitch in his effort to break pitch tracking websites everywhere. Is the 'sleeper' — a slower sweeper — the next trend? Power, command and a wide arsenal: he's got everything.
Stuff+
110
Location+
111
Pitching+
120
Health
91%
Proj. IP
193
ppERA
2.74
ppK%
29.9%
PIT
3

Garrett Crochet

117 Stuff+
2.9 ppERA
Blurb Process
With a top-10 fastball in the league and the best cutter thrown by a starter (both by Stuff+), Garrett Crochet has an excellent foundation. For his long-term success, though, some of his evolution last year might be just as important as the dominance of those two pitches. He diversified. Throwing more sinkers and sliders may not seem ideal for a lefty (given the platoon splits on pitches like those), but they did make him a four-pitch power dude with command. Even his biggest fans have to admit there's a little whiff of injury risk here still, though.
Blurb Process
With a top-10 fastball in the league and the best cutter thrown by a starter (both by Stuff+), Garrett Crochet has an excellent foundation. For his long-term success, though, some of his evolution last year might be just as important as the dominance of those two pitches. He diversified. Throwing more sinkers and sliders may not seem ideal for a lefty (given the platoon splits on pitches like those), but they did make him a four-pitch power dude with command. Even his biggest fans have to admit there's a little whiff of injury risk here still, though.
With a top-10 fastball in the league and the best cutter thrown by a starter (both by Stuff+), Garrett Crochet has an excellent foundation. For his long-term success, though, some of his evolution last year might be just as important as the dominance of those two pitches. He diversified. Throwing more sinkers and sliders may not seem ideal for a lefty (given the platoon splits on pitches like those), but they did make him a four-pitch power dude with command. Even his biggest fans have to admit there's a little whiff of injury risk here still, though.
Stuff+
117
Location+
100
Pitching+
114
Health
85%
Proj. IP
191
ppERA
2.90
ppK%
30.5%
BOS
4

Yoshinobu Yamamoto

100 Stuff+
3.22 ppERA
Blurb Process
A statistic like Stuff+ matters the most in the first five starts of a pitcher's career. After that, you start folding in result statistics like strikeout minus walk rate, ground-ball rate and so on. So the fact that Yoshinobu Yamamoto's Stuff+ is merely above-average for a starting pitcher is not incredibly important any more. He's demonstrated that he can put results on the field, and even managed more than 170 innings for a Dodgers team that was running a six-man rotation out there — bulk doesn't seem like a problem either. That stone-cold ace on the mound in the World Series Game 7 seems likely to put up another stunner of a season in 2026.
Blurb Process
A statistic like Stuff+ matters the most in the first five starts of a pitcher's career. After that, you start folding in result statistics like strikeout minus walk rate, ground-ball rate and so on. So the fact that Yoshinobu Yamamoto's Stuff+ is merely above-average for a starting pitcher is not incredibly important any more. He's demonstrated that he can put results on the field, and even managed more than 170 innings for a Dodgers team that was running a six-man rotation out there — bulk doesn't seem like a problem either. That stone-cold ace on the mound in the World Series Game 7 seems likely to put up another stunner of a season in 2026.
A statistic like Stuff+ matters the most in the first five starts of a pitcher's career. After that, you start folding in result statistics like strikeout minus walk rate, ground-ball rate and so on. So the fact that Yoshinobu Yamamoto's Stuff+ is merely above-average for a starting pitcher is not incredibly important any more. He's demonstrated that he can put results on the field, and even managed more than 170 innings for a Dodgers team that was running a six-man rotation out there — bulk doesn't seem like a problem either. That stone-cold ace on the mound in the World Series Game 7 seems likely to put up another stunner of a season in 2026.
Stuff+
100
Location+
107
Pitching+
110
Health
85%
Proj. IP
178
ppERA
3.22
ppK%
27.6%
LAD
5

Cristopher Sánchez

117 Stuff+
3.09 ppERA
Blurb Process
Last spring training, Cristopher Sánchez was a top-40 ranked young starting pitcher with some upside and some downside. He had a nasty sinker, kept the ball on the ground and didn't walk guys — but he also had a below-average strikeout rate and seemed to need a cutter. After teasing us in the spring with a cutter, he broke out the old-fashioned way. He threw harder. Now 95+ on the fastball and 85+ on the slider, his stuff and strikeout numbers surged, and he looks like an ace. If the strikeout rates regress a little, he may end up being more of a high-end No. 2 starter, but that's still an excellent combo of floor and ceiling. He ended up last year ranked fifth among starters.
Blurb Process
Last spring training, Cristopher Sánchez was a top-40 ranked young starting pitcher with some upside and some downside. He had a nasty sinker, kept the ball on the ground and didn't walk guys — but he also had a below-average strikeout rate and seemed to need a cutter. After teasing us in the spring with a cutter, he broke out the old-fashioned way. He threw harder. Now 95+ on the fastball and 85+ on the slider, his stuff and strikeout numbers surged, and he looks like an ace. If the strikeout rates regress a little, he may end up being more of a high-end No. 2 starter, but that's still an excellent combo of floor and ceiling. He ended up last year ranked fifth among starters.
Last spring training, Cristopher Sánchez was a top-40 ranked young starting pitcher with some upside and some downside. He had a nasty sinker, kept the ball on the ground and didn't walk guys — but he also had a below-average strikeout rate and seemed to need a cutter. After teasing us in the spring with a cutter, he broke out the old-fashioned way. He threw harder. Now 95+ on the fastball and 85+ on the slider, his stuff and strikeout numbers surged, and he looks like an ace. If the strikeout rates regress a little, he may end up being more of a high-end No. 2 starter, but that's still an excellent combo of floor and ceiling. He ended up last year ranked fifth among starters.
Stuff+
117
Location+
99
Pitching+
116
Health
94%
Proj. IP
196
ppERA
3.09
ppK%
24.8%
PHI
6

Hunter Brown

105 Stuff+
3.36 ppERA
Blurb Process
Ever since he added a sinker, Hunter Brown has been an ace. Over the last two seasons, he's top 15 in innings and strikeouts while putting up a 2.94 ERA that would be fourth among qualified starters. A tiny orange flag popped up in the second half last year, when his strikeout rate dropped to 24 percent and his velo was down a slight bit. But his arsenal still has some remaining upside he can mine: the cutter (6 percent) and curveball (18 percent) are both well-regarded by pitching models. He could throw those more and become a little more deceptive to hitters once again.
Blurb Process
Ever since he added a sinker, Hunter Brown has been an ace. Over the last two seasons, he's top 15 in innings and strikeouts while putting up a 2.94 ERA that would be fourth among qualified starters. A tiny orange flag popped up in the second half last year, when his strikeout rate dropped to 24 percent and his velo was down a slight bit. But his arsenal still has some remaining upside he can mine: the cutter (6 percent) and curveball (18 percent) are both well-regarded by pitching models. He could throw those more and become a little more deceptive to hitters once again.
Ever since he added a sinker, Hunter Brown has been an ace. Over the last two seasons, he's top 15 in innings and strikeouts while putting up a 2.94 ERA that would be fourth among qualified starters. A tiny orange flag popped up in the second half last year, when his strikeout rate dropped to 24 percent and his velo was down a slight bit. But his arsenal still has some remaining upside he can mine: the cutter (6 percent) and curveball (18 percent) are both well-regarded by pitching models. He could throw those more and become a little more deceptive to hitters once again.
Stuff+
105
Location+
97
Pitching+
103
Health
93%
Proj. IP
197
ppERA
3.36
ppK%
26.3%
HOU
7

Max Fried

109 Stuff+
3.32 ppERA
Blurb Process
In terms of some advanced metrics, Max Fried looked like he was virtually the same in 2024 and 2025. That wasn't really the case. He had a completely new sinker that he threw more often last season, his slider and sweeper separated further into two better pitches, he had career-best ride on his four-seamer, his cutter gained five ticks of gas, his changeup dropped more and he threw almost everything just a little harder from a slightly lower arm angle. So yeah, he was as good as he's ever been — maybe even better, considering how diversified his arsenal is now in New York.
Blurb Process
In terms of some advanced metrics, Max Fried looked like he was virtually the same in 2024 and 2025. That wasn't really the case. He had a completely new sinker that he threw more often last season, his slider and sweeper separated further into two better pitches, he had career-best ride on his four-seamer, his cutter gained five ticks of gas, his changeup dropped more and he threw almost everything just a little harder from a slightly lower arm angle. So yeah, he was as good as he's ever been — maybe even better, considering how diversified his arsenal is now in New York.
In terms of some advanced metrics, Max Fried looked like he was virtually the same in 2024 and 2025. That wasn't really the case. He had a completely new sinker that he threw more often last season, his slider and sweeper separated further into two better pitches, he had career-best ride on his four-seamer, his cutter gained five ticks of gas, his changeup dropped more and he threw almost everything just a little harder from a slightly lower arm angle. So yeah, he was as good as he's ever been — maybe even better, considering how diversified his arsenal is now in New York.
Stuff+
109
Location+
103
Pitching+
113
Health
87%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
3.32
ppK%
23.4%
NYY
8

Logan Gilbert

104 Stuff+
3.05 ppERA
Blurb Process
Forearm tightness. Around that injury, Logan Gilbert looked as good as ever under the hood, with the best strikeout rate of his career, the customary low walk rate and his ability to stifle balls in play. Now a splitter guy, his awesome extension makes it hard on hitters to put their "A" swing on any of his pitches, let alone the dip-diving changeup. But there was that injury, and he did look a little gassed in the playoffs. How much are you going to let that bother you? In the worst fantasy year of his career, he was still a top-30 starting pitcher overall.
Blurb Process
Forearm tightness. Around that injury, Logan Gilbert looked as good as ever under the hood, with the best strikeout rate of his career, the customary low walk rate and his ability to stifle balls in play. Now a splitter guy, his awesome extension makes it hard on hitters to put their "A" swing on any of his pitches, let alone the dip-diving changeup. But there was that injury, and he did look a little gassed in the playoffs. How much are you going to let that bother you? In the worst fantasy year of his career, he was still a top-30 starting pitcher overall.
Forearm tightness. Around that injury, Logan Gilbert looked as good as ever under the hood, with the best strikeout rate of his career, the customary low walk rate and his ability to stifle balls in play. Now a splitter guy, his awesome extension makes it hard on hitters to put their "A" swing on any of his pitches, let alone the dip-diving changeup. But there was that injury, and he did look a little gassed in the playoffs. How much are you going to let that bother you? In the worst fantasy year of his career, he was still a top-30 starting pitcher overall.
Stuff+
104
Location+
102
Pitching+
108
Health
88%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
3.05
ppK%
27.7%
SEA
9

Bryan Woo

109 Stuff+
3.14 ppERA
Blurb Process
This health grade for Bryan Woo seems a little rosy. It probably doesn't include his college Tommy John surgery, and though some of Woo's nicks and cuts have been to his body rather than his arm, they seem relevant. Last year, he ran out of gas at the end of the season and a right pec injury kept him from starting in the playoffs. He set a career high in innings with 191, an increase of more than 50 over his previous high. While that kind of jump is not a definite precursor to injury, it certainly seems to be at least an orange flag when combined with his history. He's so, so good on the field, though, even if it's really fastball-heavy.
Blurb Process
This health grade for Bryan Woo seems a little rosy. It probably doesn't include his college Tommy John surgery, and though some of Woo's nicks and cuts have been to his body rather than his arm, they seem relevant. Last year, he ran out of gas at the end of the season and a right pec injury kept him from starting in the playoffs. He set a career high in innings with 191, an increase of more than 50 over his previous high. While that kind of jump is not a definite precursor to injury, it certainly seems to be at least an orange flag when combined with his history. He's so, so good on the field, though, even if it's really fastball-heavy.
This health grade for Bryan Woo seems a little rosy. It probably doesn't include his college Tommy John surgery, and though some of Woo's nicks and cuts have been to his body rather than his arm, they seem relevant. Last year, he ran out of gas at the end of the season and a right pec injury kept him from starting in the playoffs. He set a career high in innings with 191, an increase of more than 50 over his previous high. While that kind of jump is not a definite precursor to injury, it certainly seems to be at least an orange flag when combined with his history. He's so, so good on the field, though, even if it's really fastball-heavy.
Stuff+
109
Location+
105
Pitching+
112
Health
87%
Proj. IP
171
ppERA
3.14
ppK%
26.0%
SEA
10

Chris Sale

116 Stuff+
3.02 ppERA
Blurb Process
Just when 2024's workload made us think that Chris Sale might've found some extra longevity after his trade to Atlanta, 2025 reminded us that while he's still an ace, he's also 36 years old. This time, the culprit was a freak injury: a fractured ribcage suffered on an acrobatic play. But age alone, even without Sale's own history, means this kind of thing will happen more often. He's nasty, dynamic and on a team that will hand him wins, but the number of innings Sale will put up is definitely in question.
Blurb Process
Just when 2024's workload made us think that Chris Sale might've found some extra longevity after his trade to Atlanta, 2025 reminded us that while he's still an ace, he's also 36 years old. This time, the culprit was a freak injury: a fractured ribcage suffered on an acrobatic play. But age alone, even without Sale's own history, means this kind of thing will happen more often. He's nasty, dynamic and on a team that will hand him wins, but the number of innings Sale will put up is definitely in question.
Just when 2024's workload made us think that Chris Sale might've found some extra longevity after his trade to Atlanta, 2025 reminded us that while he's still an ace, he's also 36 years old. This time, the culprit was a freak injury: a fractured ribcage suffered on an acrobatic play. But age alone, even without Sale's own history, means this kind of thing will happen more often. He's nasty, dynamic and on a team that will hand him wins, but the number of innings Sale will put up is definitely in question.
Stuff+
116
Location+
102
Pitching+
113
Health
63%
Proj. IP
159
ppERA
3.02
ppK%
29.8%
ATL
11

Hunter Greene

120 Stuff+
3.24 ppERA
Blurb Process
Maybe it's just too much stress on an arm to throw this hard. Hunter Greene just sat 99.5 mph on the four-seam fastball for over 100 innings, the first time that's ever been done. It's a huge part of why he's so dominant, and why he's going as an ace in most leagues. Over the last five seasons, there have been 20 pitchers that have averaged over 97 mph on the fastball for that many innings, and 11 of them have suffered major arm injuries in that same time frame. If Greene avoids the major problems and just misses a few innings, he can still be valuable. Last year he was the 22nd-best starter despite missing a couple months. He is that good. But if the major problem comes, you might rue the pick despite the promise.
Blurb Process
Maybe it's just too much stress on an arm to throw this hard. Hunter Greene just sat 99.5 mph on the four-seam fastball for over 100 innings, the first time that's ever been done. It's a huge part of why he's so dominant, and why he's going as an ace in most leagues. Over the last five seasons, there have been 20 pitchers that have averaged over 97 mph on the fastball for that many innings, and 11 of them have suffered major arm injuries in that same time frame. If Greene avoids the major problems and just misses a few innings, he can still be valuable. Last year he was the 22nd-best starter despite missing a couple months. He is that good. But if the major problem comes, you might rue the pick despite the promise.
Maybe it's just too much stress on an arm to throw this hard. Hunter Greene just sat 99.5 mph on the four-seam fastball for over 100 innings, the first time that's ever been done. It's a huge part of why he's so dominant, and why he's going as an ace in most leagues. Over the last five seasons, there have been 20 pitchers that have averaged over 97 mph on the fastball for that many innings, and 11 of them have suffered major arm injuries in that same time frame. If Greene avoids the major problems and just misses a few innings, he can still be valuable. Last year he was the 22nd-best starter despite missing a couple months. He is that good. But if the major problem comes, you might rue the pick despite the promise.
Stuff+
120
Location+
104
Pitching+
120
Health
73%
Proj. IP
169
ppERA
3.24
ppK%
30.5%
CIN
12

Cole Ragans

112 Stuff+
3.37 ppERA
Blurb Process
A couple of elbow surgeries sidelined Cole Ragans for a while in the Rangers organization. In the Royals organization after a trade, he broke free of perpetual rehab and became a capital 'S' stud in 2024 and finished fourth in the American League Cy Young voting. Last year, though, it was a new affliction: a rotator cuff strain, on the heels of a groin strain. The bad news was that it limited him to just over 60 innings and kept him out of the top 100 starting pitchers on the year. The good news was that he came back and showed the same stuff that launched his career just a year before. With that wide arsenal of high-stuff pitches and good command, he's on a short list of pitchers who could win hardware this year. Which is why you take on the injury risk.
Blurb Process
A couple of elbow surgeries sidelined Cole Ragans for a while in the Rangers organization. In the Royals organization after a trade, he broke free of perpetual rehab and became a capital 'S' stud in 2024 and finished fourth in the American League Cy Young voting. Last year, though, it was a new affliction: a rotator cuff strain, on the heels of a groin strain. The bad news was that it limited him to just over 60 innings and kept him out of the top 100 starting pitchers on the year. The good news was that he came back and showed the same stuff that launched his career just a year before. With that wide arsenal of high-stuff pitches and good command, he's on a short list of pitchers who could win hardware this year. Which is why you take on the injury risk.
A couple of elbow surgeries sidelined Cole Ragans for a while in the Rangers organization. In the Royals organization after a trade, he broke free of perpetual rehab and became a capital 'S' stud in 2024 and finished fourth in the American League Cy Young voting. Last year, though, it was a new affliction: a rotator cuff strain, on the heels of a groin strain. The bad news was that it limited him to just over 60 innings and kept him out of the top 100 starting pitchers on the year. The good news was that he came back and showed the same stuff that launched his career just a year before. With that wide arsenal of high-stuff pitches and good command, he's on a short list of pitchers who could win hardware this year. Which is why you take on the injury risk.
Stuff+
112
Location+
101
Pitching+
111
Health
78%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
3.37
ppK%
28.9%
KCR
13

Jacob deGrom

108 Stuff+
3.41 ppERA
Blurb Process
That's a nice projection for Jacob deGrom. Coming off a season in which he threw more than 170 innings for the first time since 2019, and did so sitting once again in the high 90s with his fastball, it makes sense. He was almost vintage. But it was his worst fastball velocity since 2019, his worst strikeout rate since 2016, his worst homer rate of his career and his whiff rate wasn't quite there either. Even the walk rate was a five-year high. You make him your ace if you have injury list slots, and if you are in a shallower league where the alternative when he's out won't be so bad. In deep leagues with no IL, it's time to decide how many innings you think he'll pitch this year.
Blurb Process
That's a nice projection for Jacob deGrom. Coming off a season in which he threw more than 170 innings for the first time since 2019, and did so sitting once again in the high 90s with his fastball, it makes sense. He was almost vintage. But it was his worst fastball velocity since 2019, his worst strikeout rate since 2016, his worst homer rate of his career and his whiff rate wasn't quite there either. Even the walk rate was a five-year high. You make him your ace if you have injury list slots, and if you are in a shallower league where the alternative when he's out won't be so bad. In deep leagues with no IL, it's time to decide how many innings you think he'll pitch this year.
That's a nice projection for Jacob deGrom. Coming off a season in which he threw more than 170 innings for the first time since 2019, and did so sitting once again in the high 90s with his fastball, it makes sense. He was almost vintage. But it was his worst fastball velocity since 2019, his worst strikeout rate since 2016, his worst homer rate of his career and his whiff rate wasn't quite there either. Even the walk rate was a five-year high. You make him your ace if you have injury list slots, and if you are in a shallower league where the alternative when he's out won't be so bad. In deep leagues with no IL, it's time to decide how many innings you think he'll pitch this year.
Stuff+
108
Location+
107
Pitching+
117
Health
53%
Proj. IP
157
ppERA
3.41
ppK%
27.1%
TEX
14

George Kirby

99 Stuff+
3.21 ppERA
Blurb Process
It ended up just being shoulder inflammation. Among his piers in this little mini-tier of pitchers with Cy-worth upside and health risk, George Kirby's inflammation was a comparative blip. He's had some soreness there in other years, but he's mostly posted and seems like a better bet to put up 180 innings than the five or six guys ahead of him on the list. Should he just leapfrog them and land higher up then? Possibly. But his projections aren't quite as good. He's more command than stuff, and his career strikeout rate is about 1 percentage point higher than league average. So much of this part of the rankings is negotating that trade-off between per-inning upside and volume downside.
Blurb Process
It ended up just being shoulder inflammation. Among his piers in this little mini-tier of pitchers with Cy-worth upside and health risk, George Kirby's inflammation was a comparative blip. He's had some soreness there in other years, but he's mostly posted and seems like a better bet to put up 180 innings than the five or six guys ahead of him on the list. Should he just leapfrog them and land higher up then? Possibly. But his projections aren't quite as good. He's more command than stuff, and his career strikeout rate is about 1 percentage point higher than league average. So much of this part of the rankings is negotating that trade-off between per-inning upside and volume downside.
It ended up just being shoulder inflammation. Among his piers in this little mini-tier of pitchers with Cy-worth upside and health risk, George Kirby's inflammation was a comparative blip. He's had some soreness there in other years, but he's mostly posted and seems like a better bet to put up 180 innings than the five or six guys ahead of him on the list. Should he just leapfrog them and land higher up then? Possibly. But his projections aren't quite as good. He's more command than stuff, and his career strikeout rate is about 1 percentage point higher than league average. So much of this part of the rankings is negotating that trade-off between per-inning upside and volume downside.
Stuff+
99
Location+
111
Pitching+
109
Health
86%
Proj. IP
171
ppERA
3.21
ppK%
24.2%
SEA
15

Logan Webb

106 Stuff+
3.25 ppERA
Blurb Process
A wider arsenal took some of the pressure off of Logan Webb's best two pitches — the sinker and the changeup — and pushed the Giants' ace to the best season of his career in 2025. Should he repeat that 26 percent strikeout rate and get a little better luck on balls in play this season, there might be one more level for the pitcher with the highest floor in baseball. If he gets there, he probably nets some personal hardware and definitely benefits those fantasy managers who believed in him. Most likely, the mid-level strikeout rate makes him a solid fantasy No. 2 starter who fits nicely with an injury risk ace.
Blurb Process
A wider arsenal took some of the pressure off of Logan Webb's best two pitches — the sinker and the changeup — and pushed the Giants' ace to the best season of his career in 2025. Should he repeat that 26 percent strikeout rate and get a little better luck on balls in play this season, there might be one more level for the pitcher with the highest floor in baseball. If he gets there, he probably nets some personal hardware and definitely benefits those fantasy managers who believed in him. Most likely, the mid-level strikeout rate makes him a solid fantasy No. 2 starter who fits nicely with an injury risk ace.
A wider arsenal took some of the pressure off of Logan Webb's best two pitches — the sinker and the changeup — and pushed the Giants' ace to the best season of his career in 2025. Should he repeat that 26 percent strikeout rate and get a little better luck on balls in play this season, there might be one more level for the pitcher with the highest floor in baseball. If he gets there, he probably nets some personal hardware and definitely benefits those fantasy managers who believed in him. Most likely, the mid-level strikeout rate makes him a solid fantasy No. 2 starter who fits nicely with an injury risk ace.
Stuff+
106
Location+
105
Pitching+
110
Health
97%
Proj. IP
201
ppERA
3.25
ppK%
23.6%
SFG
16

Framber Valdez

106 Stuff+
3.48 ppERA
Blurb Process
Statistically speaking, Framber Valdez has been a rock. Last year was probably his worst season, fantasy-wise, and he still was a top 40 starting pitcher because he kept the ball on the ground and paired that with his customary above-average strikeout rate, which is not usual for a worm-burner. The command is not great, and it was his worst walk rate in four years, but command isn't as sticky year to year as stuff. If he returns to his 2023-24 value, he'll be a top 20 starting pitcher and well worth this rank. If the decline has started, he'll still return mid-rotation value. Great floor pick.
Blurb Process
Statistically speaking, Framber Valdez has been a rock. Last year was probably his worst season, fantasy-wise, and he still was a top 40 starting pitcher because he kept the ball on the ground and paired that with his customary above-average strikeout rate, which is not usual for a worm-burner. The command is not great, and it was his worst walk rate in four years, but command isn't as sticky year to year as stuff. If he returns to his 2023-24 value, he'll be a top 20 starting pitcher and well worth this rank. If the decline has started, he'll still return mid-rotation value. Great floor pick.
Statistically speaking, Framber Valdez has been a rock. Last year was probably his worst season, fantasy-wise, and he still was a top 40 starting pitcher because he kept the ball on the ground and paired that with his customary above-average strikeout rate, which is not usual for a worm-burner. The command is not great, and it was his worst walk rate in four years, but command isn't as sticky year to year as stuff. If he returns to his 2023-24 value, he'll be a top 20 starting pitcher and well worth this rank. If the decline has started, he'll still return mid-rotation value. Great floor pick.
Stuff+
106
Location+
100
Pitching+
110
Health
90%
Proj. IP
191
ppERA
3.48
ppK%
22.9%
17

Spencer Schwellenbach

107 Stuff+
3.55 ppERA
Blurb Process
Because he's a funky delivery guy with a lower arm slot but suprising cut-ride movement on his four-seamer, Spencer Schwellenbach has been hard on hitters since the minute he hit the big leagues. His wide arsenal and good command give him a high floor. About that ceiling ... he hit another level mid-season last year, pushing his average fastball north of 98 mph for a bit, and his strikeout rate approached 30 percent. That would be a delicious outcome for your second starting pitcher in any league, but that velo was also why Schwellenbach thinks he suffered a subsequent elbow injury. Either way, we're watching the gun this spring.
Blurb Process
Because he's a funky delivery guy with a lower arm slot but suprising cut-ride movement on his four-seamer, Spencer Schwellenbach has been hard on hitters since the minute he hit the big leagues. His wide arsenal and good command give him a high floor. About that ceiling ... he hit another level mid-season last year, pushing his average fastball north of 98 mph for a bit, and his strikeout rate approached 30 percent. That would be a delicious outcome for your second starting pitcher in any league, but that velo was also why Schwellenbach thinks he suffered a subsequent elbow injury. Either way, we're watching the gun this spring.
Because he's a funky delivery guy with a lower arm slot but suprising cut-ride movement on his four-seamer, Spencer Schwellenbach has been hard on hitters since the minute he hit the big leagues. His wide arsenal and good command give him a high floor. About that ceiling ... he hit another level mid-season last year, pushing his average fastball north of 98 mph for a bit, and his strikeout rate approached 30 percent. That would be a delicious outcome for your second starting pitcher in any league, but that velo was also why Schwellenbach thinks he suffered a subsequent elbow injury. Either way, we're watching the gun this spring.
Stuff+
107
Location+
109
Pitching+
116
Health
79%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
3.55
ppK%
24.0%
ATL
18

Eury Pérez

115 Stuff+
3.59 ppERA
Blurb Process
The promise is tantalizing. With a 98-mph fastball, an 86-mph power slider, a 90-mph changeup and a couple more nasty pitches to boot, Eury Pérez has everything he needs to make a Cristopher Sánchez-type leap into the top 15. Like the young Phillie, Pérez had top-10 overall Stuff+ among starters last year. Pérez's personal obstacle is a little bit of homeritis, but he has a great home park and there's no glaring reason he can't leap this hurdle and be the next Marlins ace.
Blurb Process
The promise is tantalizing. With a 98-mph fastball, an 86-mph power slider, a 90-mph changeup and a couple more nasty pitches to boot, Eury Pérez has everything he needs to make a Cristopher Sánchez-type leap into the top 15. Like the young Phillie, Pérez had top-10 overall Stuff+ among starters last year. Pérez's personal obstacle is a little bit of homeritis, but he has a great home park and there's no glaring reason he can't leap this hurdle and be the next Marlins ace.
The promise is tantalizing. With a 98-mph fastball, an 86-mph power slider, a 90-mph changeup and a couple more nasty pitches to boot, Eury Pérez has everything he needs to make a Cristopher Sánchez-type leap into the top 15. Like the young Phillie, Pérez had top-10 overall Stuff+ among starters last year. Pérez's personal obstacle is a little bit of homeritis, but he has a great home park and there's no glaring reason he can't leap this hurdle and be the next Marlins ace.
Stuff+
115
Location+
97
Pitching+
108
Health
65%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
3.59
ppK%
27.1%
MIA
19

Kyle Bradish

102 Stuff+
3.52 ppERA
Blurb Process
Kyle Bradish came back and pitched after his Tommy John surgery, and though the stuff numbers weren't quite as good as before, the strikeout rate certainly was. He retired nearly 40 percent of opposing batters by way of the K, so the breaking ball at least was really working. Whether or not there really is a grace period after Tommy John, he seems healthy now, and at the point in his career where it's unlikely the Orioles are going to baby him innings-wise. You take some innings off the projection to reflect the risk, but otherwise, he's good to go.
Blurb Process
Kyle Bradish came back and pitched after his Tommy John surgery, and though the stuff numbers weren't quite as good as before, the strikeout rate certainly was. He retired nearly 40 percent of opposing batters by way of the K, so the breaking ball at least was really working. Whether or not there really is a grace period after Tommy John, he seems healthy now, and at the point in his career where it's unlikely the Orioles are going to baby him innings-wise. You take some innings off the projection to reflect the risk, but otherwise, he's good to go.
Kyle Bradish came back and pitched after his Tommy John surgery, and though the stuff numbers weren't quite as good as before, the strikeout rate certainly was. He retired nearly 40 percent of opposing batters by way of the K, so the breaking ball at least was really working. Whether or not there really is a grace period after Tommy John, he seems healthy now, and at the point in his career where it's unlikely the Orioles are going to baby him innings-wise. You take some innings off the projection to reflect the risk, but otherwise, he's good to go.
Stuff+
102
Location+
104
Pitching+
106
Health
57%
Proj. IP
151
ppERA
3.52
ppK%
25.9%
BAL
20

Joe Ryan

108 Stuff+
3.62 ppERA
Blurb Process
Joe Ryan may not throw as hard as the other pitchers around him at this ranking, but his unique arm slot and fastball shape combination, plus his willingness to pitch up in the zone even if it means more homers, has made him a high-strikeout No. 2 starter for a while now. Only 14 pitchers have more strikeouts than Ryan since 2022. Over that time frame, he's figured out that his splitter is his best secondary, that two breaking balls make each of them play up, and that a sinker could be a real weapon for him. Expect 160+ innings of a good ERA with an iffy home run rate, and maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Blurb Process
Joe Ryan may not throw as hard as the other pitchers around him at this ranking, but his unique arm slot and fastball shape combination, plus his willingness to pitch up in the zone even if it means more homers, has made him a high-strikeout No. 2 starter for a while now. Only 14 pitchers have more strikeouts than Ryan since 2022. Over that time frame, he's figured out that his splitter is his best secondary, that two breaking balls make each of them play up, and that a sinker could be a real weapon for him. Expect 160+ innings of a good ERA with an iffy home run rate, and maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Joe Ryan may not throw as hard as the other pitchers around him at this ranking, but his unique arm slot and fastball shape combination, plus his willingness to pitch up in the zone even if it means more homers, has made him a high-strikeout No. 2 starter for a while now. Only 14 pitchers have more strikeouts than Ryan since 2022. Over that time frame, he's figured out that his splitter is his best secondary, that two breaking balls make each of them play up, and that a sinker could be a real weapon for him. Expect 160+ innings of a good ERA with an iffy home run rate, and maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Stuff+
108
Location+
103
Pitching+
108
Health
88%
Proj. IP
170
ppERA
3.62
ppK%
26.6%
MIN
21

Freddy Peralta

99 Stuff+
3.74 ppERA
Blurb Process
Freddy Peralta was the seventh-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. The year before, though, he was the 41st-best. He's had some good and bad streaks along the way, so it could be tempting to call last year one of the good streaks and say he's really more of a mid-level pitcher than a top one. But he's gone to work over the years, improving his breaking balls and changeup to the point where he's a full-arsenal starter with decent command. And now he's in a nice home park. Maybe he actually needs to move up!
Blurb Process
Freddy Peralta was the seventh-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. The year before, though, he was the 41st-best. He's had some good and bad streaks along the way, so it could be tempting to call last year one of the good streaks and say he's really more of a mid-level pitcher than a top one. But he's gone to work over the years, improving his breaking balls and changeup to the point where he's a full-arsenal starter with decent command. And now he's in a nice home park. Maybe he actually needs to move up!
Freddy Peralta was the seventh-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. The year before, though, he was the 41st-best. He's had some good and bad streaks along the way, so it could be tempting to call last year one of the good streaks and say he's really more of a mid-level pitcher than a top one. But he's gone to work over the years, improving his breaking balls and changeup to the point where he's a full-arsenal starter with decent command. And now he's in a nice home park. Maybe he actually needs to move up!
Stuff+
99
Location+
108
Pitching+
106
Health
86%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
3.74
ppK%
26.1%
NYM
22

Shohei Ohtani

114 Stuff+
3.08 ppERA
Blurb Process
It seems like pitching is so secondary to Shohei Ohtani's overall value, but in certain fantasy leagues, he's draftable separately as a pitcher. He has a career 3.00 ERA built on impeccable stuff and poor command, and hopefully his elbow is in good shape right now. He could easily repeat his 2022 season, when he put in 166 innings of a 2.33 ERA. But that was three years ago, and it's worth wondering if the double duty he puts in as a hitter and pitcher will always make him a little riskier on the mound, health-wise at least. Then there's also the way the Dodgers usually run six-man rotations and reduce regular season innings in anticipation of long October runs to consider.
Blurb Process
It seems like pitching is so secondary to Shohei Ohtani's overall value, but in certain fantasy leagues, he's draftable separately as a pitcher. He has a career 3.00 ERA built on impeccable stuff and poor command, and hopefully his elbow is in good shape right now. He could easily repeat his 2022 season, when he put in 166 innings of a 2.33 ERA. But that was three years ago, and it's worth wondering if the double duty he puts in as a hitter and pitcher will always make him a little riskier on the mound, health-wise at least. Then there's also the way the Dodgers usually run six-man rotations and reduce regular season innings in anticipation of long October runs to consider.
It seems like pitching is so secondary to Shohei Ohtani's overall value, but in certain fantasy leagues, he's draftable separately as a pitcher. He has a career 3.00 ERA built on impeccable stuff and poor command, and hopefully his elbow is in good shape right now. He could easily repeat his 2022 season, when he put in 166 innings of a 2.33 ERA. But that was three years ago, and it's worth wondering if the double duty he puts in as a hitter and pitcher will always make him a little riskier on the mound, health-wise at least. Then there's also the way the Dodgers usually run six-man rotations and reduce regular season innings in anticipation of long October runs to consider.
Stuff+
114
Location+
101
Pitching+
116
Health
66%
Proj. IP
121
ppERA
3.08
ppK%
29.8%
LAD
23

Blake Snell

104 Stuff+
3.33 ppERA
Blurb Process
On a per-inning basis, there are few better than Blake Snell. Over the last three seasons, only Paul Skenes and Tarik Skubal have a lower ERA in 300+ innings. But Snell only has about 20 more innings than Skenes, who wasn't even in the big leagues in 2023. Which is, of course, the rub with Snell. Coming off of a little more than 60 innings with a 2.35 ERA, the lefty didn't make much of an argument to change that book on him in 2025.
Blurb Process
On a per-inning basis, there are few better than Blake Snell. Over the last three seasons, only Paul Skenes and Tarik Skubal have a lower ERA in 300+ innings. But Snell only has about 20 more innings than Skenes, who wasn't even in the big leagues in 2023. Which is, of course, the rub with Snell. Coming off of a little more than 60 innings with a 2.35 ERA, the lefty didn't make much of an argument to change that book on him in 2025.
On a per-inning basis, there are few better than Blake Snell. Over the last three seasons, only Paul Skenes and Tarik Skubal have a lower ERA in 300+ innings. But Snell only has about 20 more innings than Skenes, who wasn't even in the big leagues in 2023. Which is, of course, the rub with Snell. Coming off of a little more than 60 innings with a 2.35 ERA, the lefty didn't make much of an argument to change that book on him in 2025.
Stuff+
104
Location+
109
Pitching+
114
Health
65%
Proj. IP
135
ppERA
3.33
ppK%
29.5%
LAD
24

Tyler Glasnow

101 Stuff+
3.39 ppERA
Blurb Process
It's tempting just to re-write the Blake Snell blurb for Tyler Glasnow, who also shines bright in small samples in any given season. But there's a little more worry about the stuff for the righty. He lost gas last season. A tick here or there, but nearly two full ticks on the curveball. His stuff number is dropping every year, and his command numbers oscillate from bad to average. He's still mid-90s with great spin, but the likelihood of getting both excellent stuff and bulk from Glasnow goes down every year.
Blurb Process
It's tempting just to re-write the Blake Snell blurb for Tyler Glasnow, who also shines bright in small samples in any given season. But there's a little more worry about the stuff for the righty. He lost gas last season. A tick here or there, but nearly two full ticks on the curveball. His stuff number is dropping every year, and his command numbers oscillate from bad to average. He's still mid-90s with great spin, but the likelihood of getting both excellent stuff and bulk from Glasnow goes down every year.
It's tempting just to re-write the Blake Snell blurb for Tyler Glasnow, who also shines bright in small samples in any given season. But there's a little more worry about the stuff for the righty. He lost gas last season. A tick here or there, but nearly two full ticks on the curveball. His stuff number is dropping every year, and his command numbers oscillate from bad to average. He's still mid-90s with great spin, but the likelihood of getting both excellent stuff and bulk from Glasnow goes down every year.
Stuff+
101
Location+
89
Pitching+
97
Health
61%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
3.39
ppK%
28.2%
LAD
25

Drew Rasmussen

108 Stuff+
3.38 ppERA
Blurb Process
There are leagues where Drew Rasmussen is less valuable, for sure. He ranks 110th out of 123 pitchers with 350+ innings in quality starts because he doesn't go deep into games. His health risk probably isn't fully captured here because of the multiple arm surgeries he had in college that aren't included in the data set. But twice now he's thrown around 150 innings with an ERA that starts with a "two." The stuff is undeniable, and despite a downturn in strikeout rate, seems to be back after his latest surgery. Just look at that projection, it's too tasty to pass up here.
Blurb Process
There are leagues where Drew Rasmussen is less valuable, for sure. He ranks 110th out of 123 pitchers with 350+ innings in quality starts because he doesn't go deep into games. His health risk probably isn't fully captured here because of the multiple arm surgeries he had in college that aren't included in the data set. But twice now he's thrown around 150 innings with an ERA that starts with a "two." The stuff is undeniable, and despite a downturn in strikeout rate, seems to be back after his latest surgery. Just look at that projection, it's too tasty to pass up here.
There are leagues where Drew Rasmussen is less valuable, for sure. He ranks 110th out of 123 pitchers with 350+ innings in quality starts because he doesn't go deep into games. His health risk probably isn't fully captured here because of the multiple arm surgeries he had in college that aren't included in the data set. But twice now he's thrown around 150 innings with an ERA that starts with a "two." The stuff is undeniable, and despite a downturn in strikeout rate, seems to be back after his latest surgery. Just look at that projection, it's too tasty to pass up here.
Stuff+
108
Location+
103
Pitching+
108
Health
72%
Proj. IP
155
ppERA
3.38
ppK%
23.4%
TBR
26

Chase Burns

116 Stuff+
2.96 ppERA
Blurb Process
Pure rocket fuel is what comes out of Chase Burns' right arm. He sat 99 mph last season with a 91-mph slider and struck out 36 percent of the guys he saw. Overall the numbers may not have looked great because he gave up a couple homers, and had terrible luck on balls in play. Maybe some of that was earned, and he'll need to trust a third pitch that he doesn't quite trust now. But like Hunter Greene and Spencer Strider before him, it looks like Burns is going to try and out-stuff any problem he sees in front of him. It should work. His stuff-fueled OOPSY projections here are a full half-run lower than in other systems.
Blurb Process
Pure rocket fuel is what comes out of Chase Burns' right arm. He sat 99 mph last season with a 91-mph slider and struck out 36 percent of the guys he saw. Overall the numbers may not have looked great because he gave up a couple homers, and had terrible luck on balls in play. Maybe some of that was earned, and he'll need to trust a third pitch that he doesn't quite trust now. But like Hunter Greene and Spencer Strider before him, it looks like Burns is going to try and out-stuff any problem he sees in front of him. It should work. His stuff-fueled OOPSY projections here are a full half-run lower than in other systems.
Pure rocket fuel is what comes out of Chase Burns' right arm. He sat 99 mph last season with a 91-mph slider and struck out 36 percent of the guys he saw. Overall the numbers may not have looked great because he gave up a couple homers, and had terrible luck on balls in play. Maybe some of that was earned, and he'll need to trust a third pitch that he doesn't quite trust now. But like Hunter Greene and Spencer Strider before him, it looks like Burns is going to try and out-stuff any problem he sees in front of him. It should work. His stuff-fueled OOPSY projections here are a full half-run lower than in other systems.
Stuff+
116
Location+
103
Pitching+
119
Health
72%
Proj. IP
139
ppERA
2.96
ppK%
31.6%
CIN
27

Dylan Cease

108 Stuff+
3.55 ppERA
Blurb Process
It's true that Dylan Cease sometimes underperforms his peripherals because he's a two-pitch pitcher with iffy command. It's also true that his peripherals are often top of the league, and that he can be super valuable even if he doesn't attain all of that promise. The ride can be wild — he was the 10th-best starter in 2024, and the 99th-best in 2025 — but there's also the fact that Cease has started to throw other pitches more often, and is joining a new team that may have new coaching for him. Over the last two seasons, Cease's K-BB ranks seventh, among the giants of our game. That's the short reason for this rank.
Blurb Process
It's true that Dylan Cease sometimes underperforms his peripherals because he's a two-pitch pitcher with iffy command. It's also true that his peripherals are often top of the league, and that he can be super valuable even if he doesn't attain all of that promise. The ride can be wild — he was the 10th-best starter in 2024, and the 99th-best in 2025 — but there's also the fact that Cease has started to throw other pitches more often, and is joining a new team that may have new coaching for him. Over the last two seasons, Cease's K-BB ranks seventh, among the giants of our game. That's the short reason for this rank.
It's true that Dylan Cease sometimes underperforms his peripherals because he's a two-pitch pitcher with iffy command. It's also true that his peripherals are often top of the league, and that he can be super valuable even if he doesn't attain all of that promise. The ride can be wild — he was the 10th-best starter in 2024, and the 99th-best in 2025 — but there's also the fact that Cease has started to throw other pitches more often, and is joining a new team that may have new coaching for him. Over the last two seasons, Cease's K-BB ranks seventh, among the giants of our game. That's the short reason for this rank.
Stuff+
108
Location+
100
Pitching+
107
Health
90%
Proj. IP
181
ppERA
3.55
ppK%
27.6%
TOR
28

Nolan McLean

108 Stuff+
3.69 ppERA
Blurb Process
That was a heck of a 48-inning debut for Nolan McLean. The Mets righty struck out nearly a third of the batters he saw, and his great results were backed up by model numbers as well as the eye test. Why isn't he ranked higher, then? He was more tentative against lefties, with a walk rate three times higher against southpaws, and at his core he's a sinker/sweeper type — both pitches that have large platoon splits. He's probably fine because the curveball, changeup and four-seamer are at least average pitches — if he can command them versus southpaws. McLean's backstory as a former two-way player to full-time pitcher could mean that polish is coming. Or maybe the stuff doesn't need polish.
Blurb Process
That was a heck of a 48-inning debut for Nolan McLean. The Mets righty struck out nearly a third of the batters he saw, and his great results were backed up by model numbers as well as the eye test. Why isn't he ranked higher, then? He was more tentative against lefties, with a walk rate three times higher against southpaws, and at his core he's a sinker/sweeper type — both pitches that have large platoon splits. He's probably fine because the curveball, changeup and four-seamer are at least average pitches — if he can command them versus southpaws. McLean's backstory as a former two-way player to full-time pitcher could mean that polish is coming. Or maybe the stuff doesn't need polish.
That was a heck of a 48-inning debut for Nolan McLean. The Mets righty struck out nearly a third of the batters he saw, and his great results were backed up by model numbers as well as the eye test. Why isn't he ranked higher, then? He was more tentative against lefties, with a walk rate three times higher against southpaws, and at his core he's a sinker/sweeper type — both pitches that have large platoon splits. He's probably fine because the curveball, changeup and four-seamer are at least average pitches — if he can command them versus southpaws. McLean's backstory as a former two-way player to full-time pitcher could mean that polish is coming. Or maybe the stuff doesn't need polish.
Stuff+
108
Location+
98
Pitching+
109
Health
79%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
3.69
ppK%
23.1%
NYM
29

Jacob Misiorowski

116 Stuff+
3.41 ppERA
Blurb Process
What's the risk with a guy who sits 99 on the fastball, has a mid-90s slider and a high-80s curveball? Well with Jacob Misiorowski, it's two-fold. The first is that he struggles with fastball command. He's found a bit of a way out with the slider, which he can he throw for strikes when he needs one. Hitters may still be able to pigeonhole him in those counts, but they'll still have to hit a 94-mph slider. The other risk is just that he throws so dang hard, there has to be more stress than usual on his elbow ligament. Otherwise, the world is his oyster.
Blurb Process
What's the risk with a guy who sits 99 on the fastball, has a mid-90s slider and a high-80s curveball? Well with Jacob Misiorowski, it's two-fold. The first is that he struggles with fastball command. He's found a bit of a way out with the slider, which he can he throw for strikes when he needs one. Hitters may still be able to pigeonhole him in those counts, but they'll still have to hit a 94-mph slider. The other risk is just that he throws so dang hard, there has to be more stress than usual on his elbow ligament. Otherwise, the world is his oyster.
What's the risk with a guy who sits 99 on the fastball, has a mid-90s slider and a high-80s curveball? Well with Jacob Misiorowski, it's two-fold. The first is that he struggles with fastball command. He's found a bit of a way out with the slider, which he can he throw for strikes when he needs one. Hitters may still be able to pigeonhole him in those counts, but they'll still have to hit a 94-mph slider. The other risk is just that he throws so dang hard, there has to be more stress than usual on his elbow ligament. Otherwise, the world is his oyster.
Stuff+
116
Location+
103
Pitching+
119
Health
74%
Proj. IP
149
ppERA
3.41
ppK%
29.0%
MIL
30

Emmet Sheehan

101 Stuff+
3.43 ppERA
Blurb Process
A strikeout rate over 30 percent, a walk rate that was better than league average, his customary two-plane mid-90s fastball, his killer changeup — it was all there for Emmet Sheehan coming back from Tommy John surgery in 2025. If there is any worry, it's that the Stuff+ model liked his changeup better than either of his breaking balls, and that he probably got to his good results on the slider mostly by command. He doesn't have a long history of command and had below-average grades on that tool as a prospect. Last year was the outlier in terms of walks and command metrics. Overall, the stuff is probably good enough to survive some command regression, though, and he's comfortably in the top six of that Dodgers rotation.
Blurb Process
A strikeout rate over 30 percent, a walk rate that was better than league average, his customary two-plane mid-90s fastball, his killer changeup — it was all there for Emmet Sheehan coming back from Tommy John surgery in 2025. If there is any worry, it's that the Stuff+ model liked his changeup better than either of his breaking balls, and that he probably got to his good results on the slider mostly by command. He doesn't have a long history of command and had below-average grades on that tool as a prospect. Last year was the outlier in terms of walks and command metrics. Overall, the stuff is probably good enough to survive some command regression, though, and he's comfortably in the top six of that Dodgers rotation.
A strikeout rate over 30 percent, a walk rate that was better than league average, his customary two-plane mid-90s fastball, his killer changeup — it was all there for Emmet Sheehan coming back from Tommy John surgery in 2025. If there is any worry, it's that the Stuff+ model liked his changeup better than either of his breaking balls, and that he probably got to his good results on the slider mostly by command. He doesn't have a long history of command and had below-average grades on that tool as a prospect. Last year was the outlier in terms of walks and command metrics. Overall, the stuff is probably good enough to survive some command regression, though, and he's comfortably in the top six of that Dodgers rotation.
Stuff+
101
Location+
106
Pitching+
109
Health
65%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
3.43
ppK%
29.6%
LAD
31

Trey Yesavage

107 Stuff+
3.39 ppERA
Blurb Process
The most extreme over-the-top release among right-handed starters produces a big, booming fastball with a ton of ride that plays above its 95-mph sitting average. But Trey Yesavage is as much about that as he is about his seam-shifted wake split-finger, which has more wiggle than you'd expect with that arm angle. Will the weird slider work? It has arm-side movement, one of a handful in the league like it, and there is no comparable pitch that is dominant. But if it just works, if it's just enough to keep them guessing, there's a working package here. The biggest question is probably the command.
Blurb Process
The most extreme over-the-top release among right-handed starters produces a big, booming fastball with a ton of ride that plays above its 95-mph sitting average. But Trey Yesavage is as much about that as he is about his seam-shifted wake split-finger, which has more wiggle than you'd expect with that arm angle. Will the weird slider work? It has arm-side movement, one of a handful in the league like it, and there is no comparable pitch that is dominant. But if it just works, if it's just enough to keep them guessing, there's a working package here. The biggest question is probably the command.
The most extreme over-the-top release among right-handed starters produces a big, booming fastball with a ton of ride that plays above its 95-mph sitting average. But Trey Yesavage is as much about that as he is about his seam-shifted wake split-finger, which has more wiggle than you'd expect with that arm angle. Will the weird slider work? It has arm-side movement, one of a handful in the league like it, and there is no comparable pitch that is dominant. But if it just works, if it's just enough to keep them guessing, there's a working package here. The biggest question is probably the command.
Stuff+
107
Location+
90
Pitching+
98
Health
78%
Proj. IP
152
ppERA
3.39
ppK%
29.0%
TOR
32

Ryan Pepiot

106 Stuff+
3.73 ppERA
Blurb Process
Ryan Pepiot was the 41st-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. He did that in a minor-league park that had the second-most wind-aided homers in baseball (second to the other minor-league park, the one in Sacramento). His homer rate was more than 60 percent higher at home, and that should iron out with a return to the Trop. Beyond that, he'll be in a dome, which makes stuff play up because there are no crosswinds to mess with movement. Treat last year as the floor and this ranking still makes sense without any growth in his third full season.
Blurb Process
Ryan Pepiot was the 41st-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. He did that in a minor-league park that had the second-most wind-aided homers in baseball (second to the other minor-league park, the one in Sacramento). His homer rate was more than 60 percent higher at home, and that should iron out with a return to the Trop. Beyond that, he'll be in a dome, which makes stuff play up because there are no crosswinds to mess with movement. Treat last year as the floor and this ranking still makes sense without any growth in his third full season.
Ryan Pepiot was the 41st-best starting pitcher in fantasy baseball last year. He did that in a minor-league park that had the second-most wind-aided homers in baseball (second to the other minor-league park, the one in Sacramento). His homer rate was more than 60 percent higher at home, and that should iron out with a return to the Trop. Beyond that, he'll be in a dome, which makes stuff play up because there are no crosswinds to mess with movement. Treat last year as the floor and this ranking still makes sense without any growth in his third full season.
Stuff+
106
Location+
97
Pitching+
103
Health
87%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
3.73
ppK%
25.1%
TBR
33

Jesús Luzardo

106 Stuff+
3.48 ppERA
Blurb Process
Coming off a season in which he struck out 28.5 percent of the batters he saw and only walked 7.5 percent off the back of a velocity and stuff resurgence, in front of a great lineup that gave him 15 wins, it's very tempting to put Jesús Luzardo higher. After all, he was a little unlucky with balls in play, and there are projection systems that take almost a half run off of his 3.92 ERA from last year. But the lefty has bounced up and down when it comes to health and velocity, and he's been hit fairly hard when his gas dips even just a tick — maybe because his fastballs don't have ideal shape. Consider this weird fact: when his fastball velocity was under 96 mph, his ERA was well north of 4.00; when his fastball velocity was over that threshhold, he had a 3.60 ERA combined. He was at 96.4 mph last season, so any bit of aging could make a bigger difference than it first seems.
Blurb Process
Coming off a season in which he struck out 28.5 percent of the batters he saw and only walked 7.5 percent off the back of a velocity and stuff resurgence, in front of a great lineup that gave him 15 wins, it's very tempting to put Jesús Luzardo higher. After all, he was a little unlucky with balls in play, and there are projection systems that take almost a half run off of his 3.92 ERA from last year. But the lefty has bounced up and down when it comes to health and velocity, and he's been hit fairly hard when his gas dips even just a tick — maybe because his fastballs don't have ideal shape. Consider this weird fact: when his fastball velocity was under 96 mph, his ERA was well north of 4.00; when his fastball velocity was over that threshhold, he had a 3.60 ERA combined. He was at 96.4 mph last season, so any bit of aging could make a bigger difference than it first seems.
Coming off a season in which he struck out 28.5 percent of the batters he saw and only walked 7.5 percent off the back of a velocity and stuff resurgence, in front of a great lineup that gave him 15 wins, it's very tempting to put Jesús Luzardo higher. After all, he was a little unlucky with balls in play, and there are projection systems that take almost a half run off of his 3.92 ERA from last year. But the lefty has bounced up and down when it comes to health and velocity, and he's been hit fairly hard when his gas dips even just a tick — maybe because his fastballs don't have ideal shape. Consider this weird fact: when his fastball velocity was under 96 mph, his ERA was well north of 4.00; when his fastball velocity was over that threshhold, he had a 3.60 ERA combined. He was at 96.4 mph last season, so any bit of aging could make a bigger difference than it first seems.
Stuff+
106
Location+
108
Pitching+
112
Health
78%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
3.48
ppK%
27.1%
PHI
34

Michael King

101 Stuff+
3.71 ppERA
Blurb Process
I'm not a doctor, I just play one every spring as I try to sort through the various injuries that have felled our favorite pitchers. Ah, I say with my spectacles pinched on the end of my nose, a 'long thoracic nerve issue.' Should be fine! More seriously, the best news was that there was no surgery on Michael King's arm last year, it really only ended up being a pinched nerve, and he was pretty close to vintage when he was on the bump. The bad news is that these were another set of injury setbacks that follow a pattern in his career, all the way back to the minor leagues. He's a great pitcher, when he's in there.
Blurb Process
I'm not a doctor, I just play one every spring as I try to sort through the various injuries that have felled our favorite pitchers. Ah, I say with my spectacles pinched on the end of my nose, a 'long thoracic nerve issue.' Should be fine! More seriously, the best news was that there was no surgery on Michael King's arm last year, it really only ended up being a pinched nerve, and he was pretty close to vintage when he was on the bump. The bad news is that these were another set of injury setbacks that follow a pattern in his career, all the way back to the minor leagues. He's a great pitcher, when he's in there.
I'm not a doctor, I just play one every spring as I try to sort through the various injuries that have felled our favorite pitchers. Ah, I say with my spectacles pinched on the end of my nose, a 'long thoracic nerve issue.' Should be fine! More seriously, the best news was that there was no surgery on Michael King's arm last year, it really only ended up being a pinched nerve, and he was pretty close to vintage when he was on the bump. The bad news is that these were another set of injury setbacks that follow a pattern in his career, all the way back to the minor leagues. He's a great pitcher, when he's in there.
Stuff+
101
Location+
100
Pitching+
102
Health
76%
Proj. IP
159
ppERA
3.71
ppK%
25.0%
SDP
35

Cam Schlittler

107 Stuff+
3.68 ppERA
Blurb Process
The Stuff+ model loves Cam Schlittler. Two above-average fastballs, three above-average breaking balls, with the cutter and sweeper scoring as elite by that metric. It's easy to see why, given the high-90s gas and above-average movement on the cutter and curve. An 88-mph sweeper is also bananas for a starter. Weirdly, though, his breaking balls didn't produce many whiffs. It could be that he didn't get enough count leverage, as he was wild at times. Overall, he still managed a nice strikeout rate and seems primed for takeoff in 2026.
Blurb Process
The Stuff+ model loves Cam Schlittler. Two above-average fastballs, three above-average breaking balls, with the cutter and sweeper scoring as elite by that metric. It's easy to see why, given the high-90s gas and above-average movement on the cutter and curve. An 88-mph sweeper is also bananas for a starter. Weirdly, though, his breaking balls didn't produce many whiffs. It could be that he didn't get enough count leverage, as he was wild at times. Overall, he still managed a nice strikeout rate and seems primed for takeoff in 2026.
The Stuff+ model loves Cam Schlittler. Two above-average fastballs, three above-average breaking balls, with the cutter and sweeper scoring as elite by that metric. It's easy to see why, given the high-90s gas and above-average movement on the cutter and curve. An 88-mph sweeper is also bananas for a starter. Weirdly, though, his breaking balls didn't produce many whiffs. It could be that he didn't get enough count leverage, as he was wild at times. Overall, he still managed a nice strikeout rate and seems primed for takeoff in 2026.
Stuff+
107
Location+
99
Pitching+
104
Health
77%
Proj. IP
151
ppERA
3.68
ppK%
24.8%
NYY
36

Nathan Eovaldi

99 Stuff+
3.65 ppERA
Blurb Process
By Wins Above Replacement, Nathan Eovaldi has been a top 15 starting pitcher since the start of 2021. There aren't a lot of leagues counting WAR as a category, but it does point to his consistency as an above-average starting pitcher in this league. Unfortunately, that consistency also includes injury, as he's only twice accrued more than 150 innings in a season over that timeframe. This offseason, it was a hernia operation. He should be fine, but at 35, with his history, it's best to expect 140 innings and be pleasantly surprised with more bulk.
Blurb Process
By Wins Above Replacement, Nathan Eovaldi has been a top 15 starting pitcher since the start of 2021. There aren't a lot of leagues counting WAR as a category, but it does point to his consistency as an above-average starting pitcher in this league. Unfortunately, that consistency also includes injury, as he's only twice accrued more than 150 innings in a season over that timeframe. This offseason, it was a hernia operation. He should be fine, but at 35, with his history, it's best to expect 140 innings and be pleasantly surprised with more bulk.
By Wins Above Replacement, Nathan Eovaldi has been a top 15 starting pitcher since the start of 2021. There aren't a lot of leagues counting WAR as a category, but it does point to his consistency as an above-average starting pitcher in this league. Unfortunately, that consistency also includes injury, as he's only twice accrued more than 150 innings in a season over that timeframe. This offseason, it was a hernia operation. He should be fine, but at 35, with his history, it's best to expect 140 innings and be pleasantly surprised with more bulk.
Stuff+
99
Location+
103
Pitching+
104
Health
61%
Proj. IP
148
ppERA
3.65
ppK%
23.0%
TEX
37

Nick Pivetta

101 Stuff+
3.76 ppERA
Blurb Process
An easy reading of Nick Pivetta's 2025 season is that he signed with a team in a more pitcher-friendly park, showed the best home run rate of his career and profited with the best season of his career. But that ignores the fact that, away from home, he still had a high home run rate (1.4 per nine) and yet managed to pitch to a mid-3s ERA. It also ignores that he changed his cutter profile and added a sinker, which widened his arsenal and allowed him to pitch deeper into games. There was certainly some luck involved — a career-low batting average on balls in play, a career-high strand rate and that career-best homer rate — that needs to be regressed. But the projection systems do all that and still like him for a high-3s ERA, a good WHIP and a fair amount of wins.
Blurb Process
An easy reading of Nick Pivetta's 2025 season is that he signed with a team in a more pitcher-friendly park, showed the best home run rate of his career and profited with the best season of his career. But that ignores the fact that, away from home, he still had a high home run rate (1.4 per nine) and yet managed to pitch to a mid-3s ERA. It also ignores that he changed his cutter profile and added a sinker, which widened his arsenal and allowed him to pitch deeper into games. There was certainly some luck involved — a career-low batting average on balls in play, a career-high strand rate and that career-best homer rate — that needs to be regressed. But the projection systems do all that and still like him for a high-3s ERA, a good WHIP and a fair amount of wins.
An easy reading of Nick Pivetta's 2025 season is that he signed with a team in a more pitcher-friendly park, showed the best home run rate of his career and profited with the best season of his career. But that ignores the fact that, away from home, he still had a high home run rate (1.4 per nine) and yet managed to pitch to a mid-3s ERA. It also ignores that he changed his cutter profile and added a sinker, which widened his arsenal and allowed him to pitch deeper into games. There was certainly some luck involved — a career-low batting average on balls in play, a career-high strand rate and that career-best homer rate — that needs to be regressed. But the projection systems do all that and still like him for a high-3s ERA, a good WHIP and a fair amount of wins.
Stuff+
101
Location+
102
Pitching+
103
Health
88%
Proj. IP
183
ppERA
3.76
ppK%
26.1%
SDP
38

Nick Lodolo

106 Stuff+
3.79 ppERA
Blurb Process
Nick Lodolo broke out last year, starting the year ranked in the top 60 here, and ending the year in the top 30 among all fantasy starting pitchers. The formula was simple. He evened out his pitch mix, throwing each of his four pitches nearly a quarter of the time. This gave him one of the better third-time-through-the-order splits in the game, as research has suggested it should. The other was just staying on the field. His innings total last year was a career high. Stuff and arsenal wise, he should be able to repeat. And the health grade is (surprisingly?) high!
Blurb Process
Nick Lodolo broke out last year, starting the year ranked in the top 60 here, and ending the year in the top 30 among all fantasy starting pitchers. The formula was simple. He evened out his pitch mix, throwing each of his four pitches nearly a quarter of the time. This gave him one of the better third-time-through-the-order splits in the game, as research has suggested it should. The other was just staying on the field. His innings total last year was a career high. Stuff and arsenal wise, he should be able to repeat. And the health grade is (surprisingly?) high!
Nick Lodolo broke out last year, starting the year ranked in the top 60 here, and ending the year in the top 30 among all fantasy starting pitchers. The formula was simple. He evened out his pitch mix, throwing each of his four pitches nearly a quarter of the time. This gave him one of the better third-time-through-the-order splits in the game, as research has suggested it should. The other was just staying on the field. His innings total last year was a career high. Stuff and arsenal wise, he should be able to repeat. And the health grade is (surprisingly?) high!
Stuff+
106
Location+
103
Pitching+
105
Health
83%
Proj. IP
171
ppERA
3.79
ppK%
24.3%
CIN
39

Zack Wheeler

110 Stuff+
3.19 ppERA
Blurb Process
It's the good Thoracic Outlet Surgery, supposedly. The vascular one, not the nerve one. The kind that just pops up and is fixed and isn't indicative of a long-term problem. Hopefully it was for Zack Wheeler, because the outcomes on that surgery in general are not good. The righty has the kind of wide arsenal and command to survive a decline in stuff. He'll be behind this spring, but if he manages 140 innings of anything at all like even the lesser versions of Wheeler (say a mid-3s ERA with a mid-20s strikeout percentage), he'd be a good value pick here.
Blurb Process
It's the good Thoracic Outlet Surgery, supposedly. The vascular one, not the nerve one. The kind that just pops up and is fixed and isn't indicative of a long-term problem. Hopefully it was for Zack Wheeler, because the outcomes on that surgery in general are not good. The righty has the kind of wide arsenal and command to survive a decline in stuff. He'll be behind this spring, but if he manages 140 innings of anything at all like even the lesser versions of Wheeler (say a mid-3s ERA with a mid-20s strikeout percentage), he'd be a good value pick here.
It's the good Thoracic Outlet Surgery, supposedly. The vascular one, not the nerve one. The kind that just pops up and is fixed and isn't indicative of a long-term problem. Hopefully it was for Zack Wheeler, because the outcomes on that surgery in general are not good. The righty has the kind of wide arsenal and command to survive a decline in stuff. He'll be behind this spring, but if he manages 140 innings of anything at all like even the lesser versions of Wheeler (say a mid-3s ERA with a mid-20s strikeout percentage), he'd be a good value pick here.
Stuff+
110
Location+
108
Pitching+
120
Health
67%
Proj. IP
131
ppERA
3.19
ppK%
29.1%
PHI
40

Edward Cabrera

104 Stuff+
3.61 ppERA
Blurb Process
Edward Cabera sits 97 on the fastball, 94 on the changeup, 89 on the slider and 84 on the changeup, all with decent-to-great movement. He dropped his arm angle and found command that he hasn't shown so far in his career. He made good on a top-100 ranking here last March with a top-60 showing on the season. Now, resplendent with stuff and command, he's been dropped onto a competitive team, seemingly ready to shine even further. He did sprain his elbow late last year, though, and a sprain is a tear. Just a question of how much of one.
Blurb Process
Edward Cabera sits 97 on the fastball, 94 on the changeup, 89 on the slider and 84 on the changeup, all with decent-to-great movement. He dropped his arm angle and found command that he hasn't shown so far in his career. He made good on a top-100 ranking here last March with a top-60 showing on the season. Now, resplendent with stuff and command, he's been dropped onto a competitive team, seemingly ready to shine even further. He did sprain his elbow late last year, though, and a sprain is a tear. Just a question of how much of one.
Edward Cabera sits 97 on the fastball, 94 on the changeup, 89 on the slider and 84 on the changeup, all with decent-to-great movement. He dropped his arm angle and found command that he hasn't shown so far in his career. He made good on a top-100 ranking here last March with a top-60 showing on the season. Now, resplendent with stuff and command, he's been dropped onto a competitive team, seemingly ready to shine even further. He did sprain his elbow late last year, though, and a sprain is a tear. Just a question of how much of one.
Stuff+
104
Location+
101
Pitching+
105
Health
72%
Proj. IP
141
ppERA
3.61
ppK%
26.0%
CHC
41

Tatsuya Imai

#N/A
4.4 ppERA
Blurb Process
The four-seam fastball comps to somewhere between Luis Castillo (with more gas) to Joe Ryan, so reports of a dead zone fastball seem overblown. The splitter seems plus, and led to near-30 percent strikeout rates in Japan. The slider is weird — it's like Trey Yesavage's reverse slider — but it doesn't need to do the heavy lifting if the other two pitches work. Tatsuya Imai loves to compete, and is charting his own course in Houston, so the intangibles seem like they're in a good spot. The only worry here is that the market took a look, and did not reward him with a huge contract. That's a data point as well.
Blurb Process
The four-seam fastball comps to somewhere between Luis Castillo (with more gas) to Joe Ryan, so reports of a dead zone fastball seem overblown. The splitter seems plus, and led to near-30 percent strikeout rates in Japan. The slider is weird — it's like Trey Yesavage's reverse slider — but it doesn't need to do the heavy lifting if the other two pitches work. Tatsuya Imai loves to compete, and is charting his own course in Houston, so the intangibles seem like they're in a good spot. The only worry here is that the market took a look, and did not reward him with a huge contract. That's a data point as well.
The four-seam fastball comps to somewhere between Luis Castillo (with more gas) to Joe Ryan, so reports of a dead zone fastball seem overblown. The splitter seems plus, and led to near-30 percent strikeout rates in Japan. The slider is weird — it's like Trey Yesavage's reverse slider — but it doesn't need to do the heavy lifting if the other two pitches work. Tatsuya Imai loves to compete, and is charting his own course in Houston, so the intangibles seem like they're in a good spot. The only worry here is that the market took a look, and did not reward him with a huge contract. That's a data point as well.
Proj. IP
148
ppERA
4.40
ppK%
22.5%
HOU
42

Pablo López

96 Stuff+
3.78 ppERA
Blurb Process
Felled by injury for so much of 2025 after putting up nearly 560 innings the three years prior, Pablo López finds himself in unfamiliar territory. The most recent news says that he's having a normal and healthy offseason, and both injuries were to muscles and not ligaments, so there's room for optimism for the stable righty with the wide arsenal and great command. The constant for him has been two decent fastballs and a strong changeup. The fiddling with the breaking balls is why the ERA has bounced around a little. Still, he's decent oatmeal for your fantasy squad: healthy with a strong foundation.
Blurb Process
Felled by injury for so much of 2025 after putting up nearly 560 innings the three years prior, Pablo López finds himself in unfamiliar territory. The most recent news says that he's having a normal and healthy offseason, and both injuries were to muscles and not ligaments, so there's room for optimism for the stable righty with the wide arsenal and great command. The constant for him has been two decent fastballs and a strong changeup. The fiddling with the breaking balls is why the ERA has bounced around a little. Still, he's decent oatmeal for your fantasy squad: healthy with a strong foundation.
Felled by injury for so much of 2025 after putting up nearly 560 innings the three years prior, Pablo López finds himself in unfamiliar territory. The most recent news says that he's having a normal and healthy offseason, and both injuries were to muscles and not ligaments, so there's room for optimism for the stable righty with the wide arsenal and great command. The constant for him has been two decent fastballs and a strong changeup. The fiddling with the breaking balls is why the ERA has bounced around a little. Still, he's decent oatmeal for your fantasy squad: healthy with a strong foundation.
Stuff+
96
Location+
110
Pitching+
107
Health
71%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
3.78
ppK%
23.7%
MIN
43

Kevin Gausman

102 Stuff+
3.94 ppERA
Blurb Process
That was a great season for a 35-year-old Kevin Gausman. He arrested a decline in both fastball velocity and strikeout rate, and put up nearly 200 innings of a 3.59 ERA. He's been everything Toronto needed him to be, and his peripherals were what you want, right? Well... a 24-percent strikeout rate is only barely above average, and even that 94.5-mph fastball is about average for a righty starter these days (incredibly, 94.1 last season). The splitter is decidedly great, but without a wide arsenal, without a decent breaking ball, it will always feel like he's on the precipice and that next velocity decline will be the one that makes a huge difference. And velocity only goes down with age.
Blurb Process
That was a great season for a 35-year-old Kevin Gausman. He arrested a decline in both fastball velocity and strikeout rate, and put up nearly 200 innings of a 3.59 ERA. He's been everything Toronto needed him to be, and his peripherals were what you want, right? Well... a 24-percent strikeout rate is only barely above average, and even that 94.5-mph fastball is about average for a righty starter these days (incredibly, 94.1 last season). The splitter is decidedly great, but without a wide arsenal, without a decent breaking ball, it will always feel like he's on the precipice and that next velocity decline will be the one that makes a huge difference. And velocity only goes down with age.
That was a great season for a 35-year-old Kevin Gausman. He arrested a decline in both fastball velocity and strikeout rate, and put up nearly 200 innings of a 3.59 ERA. He's been everything Toronto needed him to be, and his peripherals were what you want, right? Well... a 24-percent strikeout rate is only barely above average, and even that 94.5-mph fastball is about average for a righty starter these days (incredibly, 94.1 last season). The splitter is decidedly great, but without a wide arsenal, without a decent breaking ball, it will always feel like he's on the precipice and that next velocity decline will be the one that makes a huge difference. And velocity only goes down with age.
Stuff+
102
Location+
102
Pitching+
102
Health
86%
Proj. IP
188
ppERA
3.94
ppK%
23.2%
TOR
44

Spencer Strider

95 Stuff+
3.8 ppERA
Blurb Process
Usually, the stuff comes back first after Tommy John surgery. So it's probably worrisome that Spencer Strider lost two ticks and two inches of ride off the fastball, a tick and an inch of drop on the slider, and that both were hit hard in 2025. A full offseason could buck the trend versus other arms that have followed his path, but he doesn't have the benefit of a wide arsenal to fall back on if his fastball and slider don't improve in 2026. He threw the curveball and changeup a combined 15 percent of the time last year, and neither was an above-average pitch by model or by results.
Blurb Process
Usually, the stuff comes back first after Tommy John surgery. So it's probably worrisome that Spencer Strider lost two ticks and two inches of ride off the fastball, a tick and an inch of drop on the slider, and that both were hit hard in 2025. A full offseason could buck the trend versus other arms that have followed his path, but he doesn't have the benefit of a wide arsenal to fall back on if his fastball and slider don't improve in 2026. He threw the curveball and changeup a combined 15 percent of the time last year, and neither was an above-average pitch by model or by results.
Usually, the stuff comes back first after Tommy John surgery. So it's probably worrisome that Spencer Strider lost two ticks and two inches of ride off the fastball, a tick and an inch of drop on the slider, and that both were hit hard in 2025. A full offseason could buck the trend versus other arms that have followed his path, but he doesn't have the benefit of a wide arsenal to fall back on if his fastball and slider don't improve in 2026. He threw the curveball and changeup a combined 15 percent of the time last year, and neither was an above-average pitch by model or by results.
Stuff+
95
Location+
95
Pitching+
90
Health
70%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
3.80
ppK%
27.4%
ATL
45

Sonny Gray

101 Stuff+
3.68 ppERA
Blurb Process
At 36 years old, with a fastball that finally ducked under 92 mph, there's pretty much one reason Sonny Gray is ranked this high: his sweeper. One of the best pitches in the game, it has kept his strikeout rate high. He's always had a low walk rate, so most of the projection systems think he'll get that ERA back under 4.00 this year. A great breaking ball can extend a career — just ask Adam Wainwright, Charlie Morton, Justin Verlander, John Lackey and Max Scherzer, who have together put up the bulk of the best seasons by old pitchers in recent memory. But the risk is that there will only be more home runs off the low-velo fastball when the hitter anticipates it correctly. And he's not really moving into an 'easier' park by most park factors.
Blurb Process
At 36 years old, with a fastball that finally ducked under 92 mph, there's pretty much one reason Sonny Gray is ranked this high: his sweeper. One of the best pitches in the game, it has kept his strikeout rate high. He's always had a low walk rate, so most of the projection systems think he'll get that ERA back under 4.00 this year. A great breaking ball can extend a career — just ask Adam Wainwright, Charlie Morton, Justin Verlander, John Lackey and Max Scherzer, who have together put up the bulk of the best seasons by old pitchers in recent memory. But the risk is that there will only be more home runs off the low-velo fastball when the hitter anticipates it correctly. And he's not really moving into an 'easier' park by most park factors.
At 36 years old, with a fastball that finally ducked under 92 mph, there's pretty much one reason Sonny Gray is ranked this high: his sweeper. One of the best pitches in the game, it has kept his strikeout rate high. He's always had a low walk rate, so most of the projection systems think he'll get that ERA back under 4.00 this year. A great breaking ball can extend a career — just ask Adam Wainwright, Charlie Morton, Justin Verlander, John Lackey and Max Scherzer, who have together put up the bulk of the best seasons by old pitchers in recent memory. But the risk is that there will only be more home runs off the low-velo fastball when the hitter anticipates it correctly. And he's not really moving into an 'easier' park by most park factors.
Stuff+
101
Location+
99
Pitching+
103
Health
83%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
3.68
ppK%
25.3%
BOS
46

Gavin Williams

101 Stuff+
3.86 ppERA
Blurb Process
Last year, these ranks had Gavin Williams 45th, he ended up 29th among starters, he's 26 and throws in the upper 90s. He even found a cutter that seemed to pull together his arsenal. Shouldn't he be higher? There were some warning signs last year that this might not be sustainable. He had a below-average strikeout-minus-walk rate, which is a very powerful predictor. He got lucky on balls in play. He didn't show great command and he didn't get good command grades from prospect evaluators. Add in an injury history that seems to outpace his injury grade here, and this ranking probably makes a little more sense.
Blurb Process
Last year, these ranks had Gavin Williams 45th, he ended up 29th among starters, he's 26 and throws in the upper 90s. He even found a cutter that seemed to pull together his arsenal. Shouldn't he be higher? There were some warning signs last year that this might not be sustainable. He had a below-average strikeout-minus-walk rate, which is a very powerful predictor. He got lucky on balls in play. He didn't show great command and he didn't get good command grades from prospect evaluators. Add in an injury history that seems to outpace his injury grade here, and this ranking probably makes a little more sense.
Last year, these ranks had Gavin Williams 45th, he ended up 29th among starters, he's 26 and throws in the upper 90s. He even found a cutter that seemed to pull together his arsenal. Shouldn't he be higher? There were some warning signs last year that this might not be sustainable. He had a below-average strikeout-minus-walk rate, which is a very powerful predictor. He got lucky on balls in play. He didn't show great command and he didn't get good command grades from prospect evaluators. Add in an injury history that seems to outpace his injury grade here, and this ranking probably makes a little more sense.
Stuff+
101
Location+
97
Pitching+
98
Health
83%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
3.86
ppK%
24.1%
CLE
47

Luis Castillo

98 Stuff+
3.79 ppERA
Blurb Process
Yeah, Luis Castillo is in decline. For five straight seasons, he's lost fastball velocity, and without great shape on those pitches, it threatens to become a bigger deal as he approaches average in that category. His strikeout rate is down three straight seasons. His Stuff+ dropped to average for a starter for the first time. But around here in the ranks, you could choose instead to look at the birght side. He's durable. He pitches in Seattle. You can probably still use him in 120-140 of his innings and assure you keep his ERA on the right side of 4.00. He probably won't hurt you.
Blurb Process
Yeah, Luis Castillo is in decline. For five straight seasons, he's lost fastball velocity, and without great shape on those pitches, it threatens to become a bigger deal as he approaches average in that category. His strikeout rate is down three straight seasons. His Stuff+ dropped to average for a starter for the first time. But around here in the ranks, you could choose instead to look at the birght side. He's durable. He pitches in Seattle. You can probably still use him in 120-140 of his innings and assure you keep his ERA on the right side of 4.00. He probably won't hurt you.
Yeah, Luis Castillo is in decline. For five straight seasons, he's lost fastball velocity, and without great shape on those pitches, it threatens to become a bigger deal as he approaches average in that category. His strikeout rate is down three straight seasons. His Stuff+ dropped to average for a starter for the first time. But around here in the ranks, you could choose instead to look at the birght side. He's durable. He pitches in Seattle. You can probably still use him in 120-140 of his innings and assure you keep his ERA on the right side of 4.00. He probably won't hurt you.
Stuff+
98
Location+
106
Pitching+
102
Health
88%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
3.79
ppK%
22.5%
SEA
48

Tanner Bibee

103 Stuff+
3.86 ppERA
Blurb Process
On the surface, Tanner Bibee's 2025 was decidedly forgettable. A 4.24 ERA, with an okay WHIP, a below-average strikoeut rate… there's not a lot to hold on to there. The good news comes in snippets. He again showed his ability to command that excellent cutter, with excellent model rates on the pitch, and also a good overall walk rate. Stuff+ said he had five above-average pitches, so the breaking ball quality is there. The fastball isn't a great pitch, but it's 94 mph at least, and he does have a wide arsenal. By September, when he was throwing the cutter more than the fastball and was generally pitching backwards off of all his breaking stuff, Bibee found a groove. There's a good history of breaking-ball forward pitchers finding success in Cleveland, and he fits the bill more than that (unpredictive) ERA last year suggests.
Blurb Process
On the surface, Tanner Bibee's 2025 was decidedly forgettable. A 4.24 ERA, with an okay WHIP, a below-average strikoeut rate… there's not a lot to hold on to there. The good news comes in snippets. He again showed his ability to command that excellent cutter, with excellent model rates on the pitch, and also a good overall walk rate. Stuff+ said he had five above-average pitches, so the breaking ball quality is there. The fastball isn't a great pitch, but it's 94 mph at least, and he does have a wide arsenal. By September, when he was throwing the cutter more than the fastball and was generally pitching backwards off of all his breaking stuff, Bibee found a groove. There's a good history of breaking-ball forward pitchers finding success in Cleveland, and he fits the bill more than that (unpredictive) ERA last year suggests.
On the surface, Tanner Bibee's 2025 was decidedly forgettable. A 4.24 ERA, with an okay WHIP, a below-average strikoeut rate… there's not a lot to hold on to there. The good news comes in snippets. He again showed his ability to command that excellent cutter, with excellent model rates on the pitch, and also a good overall walk rate. Stuff+ said he had five above-average pitches, so the breaking ball quality is there. The fastball isn't a great pitch, but it's 94 mph at least, and he does have a wide arsenal. By September, when he was throwing the cutter more than the fastball and was generally pitching backwards off of all his breaking stuff, Bibee found a groove. There's a good history of breaking-ball forward pitchers finding success in Cleveland, and he fits the bill more than that (unpredictive) ERA last year suggests.
Stuff+
103
Location+
98
Pitching+
101
Health
96%
Proj. IP
188
ppERA
3.86
ppK%
22.4%
CLE
49

Brandon Woodruff

97 Stuff+
3.92 ppERA
Blurb Process
Anterior capsule surgery is a serious thing. It pretty much ended the careers of Rich Harden, Dallas Braden and Johan Santana. The good thing for Brandon Woodruff is that more recent pitchers have had a better run, and he had it done a little earlier in his career. That's not to say that all his stuff came back despite the pristine strikeout rate and good results in 2025. He lost nearly three ticks on his fastball, didn't throw his slider or curveball much at all, and relied on command much more than nastiness this time around. The projection systems largely don't know about the surgery, so there is some risk when it comes to results ... as well as health.
Blurb Process
Anterior capsule surgery is a serious thing. It pretty much ended the careers of Rich Harden, Dallas Braden and Johan Santana. The good thing for Brandon Woodruff is that more recent pitchers have had a better run, and he had it done a little earlier in his career. That's not to say that all his stuff came back despite the pristine strikeout rate and good results in 2025. He lost nearly three ticks on his fastball, didn't throw his slider or curveball much at all, and relied on command much more than nastiness this time around. The projection systems largely don't know about the surgery, so there is some risk when it comes to results ... as well as health.
Anterior capsule surgery is a serious thing. It pretty much ended the careers of Rich Harden, Dallas Braden and Johan Santana. The good thing for Brandon Woodruff is that more recent pitchers have had a better run, and he had it done a little earlier in his career. That's not to say that all his stuff came back despite the pristine strikeout rate and good results in 2025. He lost nearly three ticks on his fastball, didn't throw his slider or curveball much at all, and relied on command much more than nastiness this time around. The projection systems largely don't know about the surgery, so there is some risk when it comes to results ... as well as health.
Stuff+
97
Location+
106
Pitching+
101
Health
57%
Proj. IP
133
ppERA
3.92
ppK%
24.2%
MIL
50

Bubba Chandler

105 Stuff+
3.92 ppERA
Blurb Process
Bubba Chandler sits 99 on the fastball with great command. The slider is at 89 mph and appeals to the models. The changeup was a scouting favorite and gave up a .120 slugging last year. There's an argument he should be higher. But it isn't as if there are no questions at all. Righties who are changeup-first always invite scrutiny of their breaking balls, and even though Chandler's hard slider looks good on results and in models, it didn't get many whiffs. So he struck out fewer righties had a reverse platoon split — and those sorts of splits are believable quicker in pitchers, especially when they are changeup-first. Could he tweak his breaking ball selection or location and coming out looking studly? Yes, yes he could.
Blurb Process
Bubba Chandler sits 99 on the fastball with great command. The slider is at 89 mph and appeals to the models. The changeup was a scouting favorite and gave up a .120 slugging last year. There's an argument he should be higher. But it isn't as if there are no questions at all. Righties who are changeup-first always invite scrutiny of their breaking balls, and even though Chandler's hard slider looks good on results and in models, it didn't get many whiffs. So he struck out fewer righties had a reverse platoon split — and those sorts of splits are believable quicker in pitchers, especially when they are changeup-first. Could he tweak his breaking ball selection or location and coming out looking studly? Yes, yes he could.
Bubba Chandler sits 99 on the fastball with great command. The slider is at 89 mph and appeals to the models. The changeup was a scouting favorite and gave up a .120 slugging last year. There's an argument he should be higher. But it isn't as if there are no questions at all. Righties who are changeup-first always invite scrutiny of their breaking balls, and even though Chandler's hard slider looks good on results and in models, it didn't get many whiffs. So he struck out fewer righties had a reverse platoon split — and those sorts of splits are believable quicker in pitchers, especially when they are changeup-first. Could he tweak his breaking ball selection or location and coming out looking studly? Yes, yes he could.
Stuff+
105
Location+
102
Pitching+
110
Health
73%
Proj. IP
137
ppERA
3.92
ppK%
23.0%
PIT
51

Cade Horton

98 Stuff+
3.96 ppERA
Blurb Process
Cade Horton had poor peripherals behind his strong debut, that's true. His strikeout rate was below average, his strikeout-minus-walk rate was, too, and it looked like he got lucky on balls in play and with stranding base runners. All those things should regress if he follows the path of most major leaguers in the past. But there's something about his stuff that maybe public models aren't capturing. He has cut and ride on his four-seamer, and supinates well — he throws two breaking balls that performed well all year, and the curveball got better as the season progressed. This is an archetype that the Cubs have had a lot of success with. Maybe it has something to do with how that arsenal fits the defense behind him, or the park he pitches in, but there's definitely something here. Those things aren't changing next year, at least!
Blurb Process
Cade Horton had poor peripherals behind his strong debut, that's true. His strikeout rate was below average, his strikeout-minus-walk rate was, too, and it looked like he got lucky on balls in play and with stranding base runners. All those things should regress if he follows the path of most major leaguers in the past. But there's something about his stuff that maybe public models aren't capturing. He has cut and ride on his four-seamer, and supinates well — he throws two breaking balls that performed well all year, and the curveball got better as the season progressed. This is an archetype that the Cubs have had a lot of success with. Maybe it has something to do with how that arsenal fits the defense behind him, or the park he pitches in, but there's definitely something here. Those things aren't changing next year, at least!
Cade Horton had poor peripherals behind his strong debut, that's true. His strikeout rate was below average, his strikeout-minus-walk rate was, too, and it looked like he got lucky on balls in play and with stranding base runners. All those things should regress if he follows the path of most major leaguers in the past. But there's something about his stuff that maybe public models aren't capturing. He has cut and ride on his four-seamer, and supinates well — he throws two breaking balls that performed well all year, and the curveball got better as the season progressed. This is an archetype that the Cubs have had a lot of success with. Maybe it has something to do with how that arsenal fits the defense behind him, or the park he pitches in, but there's definitely something here. Those things aren't changing next year, at least!
Stuff+
98
Location+
100
Pitching+
98
Health
83%
Proj. IP
159
ppERA
3.96
ppK%
22.4%
CHC
52

Shane Bieber

91 Stuff+
3.95 ppERA
Blurb Process
In almost every way, Shane Bieber seemed to prove he was back, all the way back, late in 2025. He had his best velocity in four years, he located his slider as well as he ever had, and he even returned from Tommy John with a new kick-change that had a whopping six inches more drop than his last changeup. He got good results, even pitched well enough in the postseason ... and then we got the news that he had forearm fatigue late in the year, and that he might not be ready to start the season. Best you can do with that news is just to adjust his expected innings down a bit, I guess.
Blurb Process
In almost every way, Shane Bieber seemed to prove he was back, all the way back, late in 2025. He had his best velocity in four years, he located his slider as well as he ever had, and he even returned from Tommy John with a new kick-change that had a whopping six inches more drop than his last changeup. He got good results, even pitched well enough in the postseason ... and then we got the news that he had forearm fatigue late in the year, and that he might not be ready to start the season. Best you can do with that news is just to adjust his expected innings down a bit, I guess.
In almost every way, Shane Bieber seemed to prove he was back, all the way back, late in 2025. He had his best velocity in four years, he located his slider as well as he ever had, and he even returned from Tommy John with a new kick-change that had a whopping six inches more drop than his last changeup. He got good results, even pitched well enough in the postseason ... and then we got the news that he had forearm fatigue late in the year, and that he might not be ready to start the season. Best you can do with that news is just to adjust his expected innings down a bit, I guess.
Stuff+
91
Location+
106
Pitching+
101
Health
55%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
3.95
ppK%
21.8%
TOR
53

Carlos Rodón

107 Stuff+
3.9 ppERA
Blurb Process
After a terrible debut, Carlos Rodón has been really good for the Yankees. That's a 3.50 ERA in 370+ innings, supported by an excellent strikeout minus walk rate and some small changes to his arsenal. A few more cutters, sinkers and changeups don't seem like a big deal but the lefty had sometimes fallen into traps as a two-pitch guy in the past. All is well otherwise for Rodón, other than a small surgery to remove some loose bodies in his elbow ... that will keep him out for as much as the first month of the season. If you don't have injury list spots, that makes him tough to draft, so mentally move him down the list if that's the case.
Blurb Process
After a terrible debut, Carlos Rodón has been really good for the Yankees. That's a 3.50 ERA in 370+ innings, supported by an excellent strikeout minus walk rate and some small changes to his arsenal. A few more cutters, sinkers and changeups don't seem like a big deal but the lefty had sometimes fallen into traps as a two-pitch guy in the past. All is well otherwise for Rodón, other than a small surgery to remove some loose bodies in his elbow ... that will keep him out for as much as the first month of the season. If you don't have injury list spots, that makes him tough to draft, so mentally move him down the list if that's the case.
After a terrible debut, Carlos Rodón has been really good for the Yankees. That's a 3.50 ERA in 370+ innings, supported by an excellent strikeout minus walk rate and some small changes to his arsenal. A few more cutters, sinkers and changeups don't seem like a big deal but the lefty had sometimes fallen into traps as a two-pitch guy in the past. All is well otherwise for Rodón, other than a small surgery to remove some loose bodies in his elbow ... that will keep him out for as much as the first month of the season. If you don't have injury list spots, that makes him tough to draft, so mentally move him down the list if that's the case.
Stuff+
107
Location+
97
Pitching+
102
Health
77%
Proj. IP
135
ppERA
3.90
ppK%
24.7%
NYY
54

Sandy Alcantara

104 Stuff+
4.05 ppERA
Blurb Process
From the end of August until the end of the season, Sandy Alcantara had a 3.21 ERA supported by lots of ground balls and a good walk rate. That might be more notable than it seems for a couple reasons. For one, that wasn't just an easy stretch, as he was in Colorado and faced the Mets a couple times. And it was also his longest stretch of showing command of his slider in 2025. Command comes back last after Tommy John, and it took some time for the power righty. But it looked like he got there at the end, and he's almost always good for the innings. Be a little careful in leagues with innings caps, because he won't help you in the strikeouts category.
Blurb Process
From the end of August until the end of the season, Sandy Alcantara had a 3.21 ERA supported by lots of ground balls and a good walk rate. That might be more notable than it seems for a couple reasons. For one, that wasn't just an easy stretch, as he was in Colorado and faced the Mets a couple times. And it was also his longest stretch of showing command of his slider in 2025. Command comes back last after Tommy John, and it took some time for the power righty. But it looked like he got there at the end, and he's almost always good for the innings. Be a little careful in leagues with innings caps, because he won't help you in the strikeouts category.
From the end of August until the end of the season, Sandy Alcantara had a 3.21 ERA supported by lots of ground balls and a good walk rate. That might be more notable than it seems for a couple reasons. For one, that wasn't just an easy stretch, as he was in Colorado and faced the Mets a couple times. And it was also his longest stretch of showing command of his slider in 2025. Command comes back last after Tommy John, and it took some time for the power righty. But it looked like he got there at the end, and he's almost always good for the innings. Be a little careful in leagues with innings caps, because he won't help you in the strikeouts category.
Stuff+
104
Location+
104
Pitching+
105
Health
70%
Proj. IP
185
ppERA
4.05
ppK%
20.6%
MIA
55

Robbie Ray

100 Stuff+
4.12 ppERA
Blurb Process
Here's a weird thing about Robbie Ray: he had virtually the same ERA in San Francisco (the best pitcher's park in ball) as he had on the road last season. Here's another weird thing: his fastball is easily his best pitch, his slider his second, and he threw fewer of both and it was probably a good idea. Ray has usually racked up the strikeouts but also the homers as a mostly two-pitch (sometimes one-pitch) pitcher. Some tweaks to his other secondaries have made him a little wider in the arsenal and have brought his floor up. He's probably not going to strike out 30 percent of the batters he sees and put up an ERA that starts with a two again, but he'll most likely — despite last year's splits — be very useful at home and mostly useful on the road.
Blurb Process
Here's a weird thing about Robbie Ray: he had virtually the same ERA in San Francisco (the best pitcher's park in ball) as he had on the road last season. Here's another weird thing: his fastball is easily his best pitch, his slider his second, and he threw fewer of both and it was probably a good idea. Ray has usually racked up the strikeouts but also the homers as a mostly two-pitch (sometimes one-pitch) pitcher. Some tweaks to his other secondaries have made him a little wider in the arsenal and have brought his floor up. He's probably not going to strike out 30 percent of the batters he sees and put up an ERA that starts with a two again, but he'll most likely — despite last year's splits — be very useful at home and mostly useful on the road.
Here's a weird thing about Robbie Ray: he had virtually the same ERA in San Francisco (the best pitcher's park in ball) as he had on the road last season. Here's another weird thing: his fastball is easily his best pitch, his slider his second, and he threw fewer of both and it was probably a good idea. Ray has usually racked up the strikeouts but also the homers as a mostly two-pitch (sometimes one-pitch) pitcher. Some tweaks to his other secondaries have made him a little wider in the arsenal and have brought his floor up. He's probably not going to strike out 30 percent of the batters he sees and put up an ERA that starts with a two again, but he'll most likely — despite last year's splits — be very useful at home and mostly useful on the road.
Stuff+
100
Location+
97
Pitching+
96
Health
71%
Proj. IP
173
ppERA
4.12
ppK%
24.1%
SFG
56

Aaron Nola

101 Stuff+
4.06 ppERA
Blurb Process
By the highly scientific approach of "he's good every other year," Aaron Nola is due to put up another strong season in 2026. That's not to say that he didn't deserve any of his poor results in 2025. He lost nearly a tick on the fastball, and had the worst Stuff+ of his career (and his other two worst years were the other two bad years on his ledger). He gave up a ton of homers. But he still struck guys out an above-average rate, still showed his customary excellent command and still had that excellent curveball. And single-season homer rate is one of the flukiest metrics on a pitcher's page. So, yeah, time for him to flip the script. Again.
Blurb Process
By the highly scientific approach of "he's good every other year," Aaron Nola is due to put up another strong season in 2026. That's not to say that he didn't deserve any of his poor results in 2025. He lost nearly a tick on the fastball, and had the worst Stuff+ of his career (and his other two worst years were the other two bad years on his ledger). He gave up a ton of homers. But he still struck guys out an above-average rate, still showed his customary excellent command and still had that excellent curveball. And single-season homer rate is one of the flukiest metrics on a pitcher's page. So, yeah, time for him to flip the script. Again.
By the highly scientific approach of "he's good every other year," Aaron Nola is due to put up another strong season in 2026. That's not to say that he didn't deserve any of his poor results in 2025. He lost nearly a tick on the fastball, and had the worst Stuff+ of his career (and his other two worst years were the other two bad years on his ledger). He gave up a ton of homers. But he still struck guys out an above-average rate, still showed his customary excellent command and still had that excellent curveball. And single-season homer rate is one of the flukiest metrics on a pitcher's page. So, yeah, time for him to flip the script. Again.
Stuff+
101
Location+
108
Pitching+
108
Health
81%
Proj. IP
171
ppERA
4.06
ppK%
23.2%
PHI
57

Ranger Suárez

97 Stuff+
4.06 ppERA
Blurb Process
It probably doesn't matter that Ranger Suárez dropped to the worst fastball velocity of his career last year, right? Or that he's never thrown 160 innings in a season? Or that none of his pitches rate as above-average by Stuff+? Or that he just showed the worst ground-ball rate of his career? It's hard to ignore all of that, but it's worth pointing out that Suárez has a wide arsenal with great command, has succeeded with below-average velocity for a while now and has been pretty steady around the 150-inning mark, as well. His new park suppresses right-handed homers, and he's just 30. It's not all bad news.
Blurb Process
It probably doesn't matter that Ranger Suárez dropped to the worst fastball velocity of his career last year, right? Or that he's never thrown 160 innings in a season? Or that none of his pitches rate as above-average by Stuff+? Or that he just showed the worst ground-ball rate of his career? It's hard to ignore all of that, but it's worth pointing out that Suárez has a wide arsenal with great command, has succeeded with below-average velocity for a while now and has been pretty steady around the 150-inning mark, as well. His new park suppresses right-handed homers, and he's just 30. It's not all bad news.
It probably doesn't matter that Ranger Suárez dropped to the worst fastball velocity of his career last year, right? Or that he's never thrown 160 innings in a season? Or that none of his pitches rate as above-average by Stuff+? Or that he just showed the worst ground-ball rate of his career? It's hard to ignore all of that, but it's worth pointing out that Suárez has a wide arsenal with great command, has succeeded with below-average velocity for a while now and has been pretty steady around the 150-inning mark, as well. His new park suppresses right-handed homers, and he's just 30. It's not all bad news.
Stuff+
97
Location+
110
Pitching+
106
Health
91%
Proj. IP
174
ppERA
4.06
ppK%
21.4%
BOS
58

Jack Flaherty

102 Stuff+
3.79 ppERA
Blurb Process
Jack Flaherty wasn't great last year. His velocity slipped again, as did his strikeout rate, and he ended up with a high-4s ERA. He got a little unlucky on balls in play, but he's always had higher home-run rates, and his strand rate was fine. What do you do with a player like this? One who is obviously in decline, and whose career has been pretty erratic to begin with? His ERA was a run better at home, so I guess you start him there ... and you're cautious with him elsewhere.
Blurb Process
Jack Flaherty wasn't great last year. His velocity slipped again, as did his strikeout rate, and he ended up with a high-4s ERA. He got a little unlucky on balls in play, but he's always had higher home-run rates, and his strand rate was fine. What do you do with a player like this? One who is obviously in decline, and whose career has been pretty erratic to begin with? His ERA was a run better at home, so I guess you start him there ... and you're cautious with him elsewhere.
Jack Flaherty wasn't great last year. His velocity slipped again, as did his strikeout rate, and he ended up with a high-4s ERA. He got a little unlucky on balls in play, but he's always had higher home-run rates, and his strand rate was fine. What do you do with a player like this? One who is obviously in decline, and whose career has been pretty erratic to begin with? His ERA was a run better at home, so I guess you start him there ... and you're cautious with him elsewhere.
Stuff+
102
Location+
101
Pitching+
103
Health
86%
Proj. IP
168
ppERA
3.79
ppK%
25.4%
DET
59

Gerrit Cole

#N/A
3.59 ppERA
Blurb Process
You're flying a little blind if you're taking Gerrit Cole here, and you'll need an injury slot or a tough stomach to make it to June, when the Yankees say they expect him back. Could you then get 120 excellent innings? Sure, he's been a metronome, one of the highest-floor pitchers in the sport. He was durable before this injury, too, so you could talk yourself into the likelihood that he doesn't have a setback. But, unlike a Kyle Bradish in 2025 or a Jacob deGrom in 2024, you won't have seen Cole on the mound, demonstrating the return of his stuff, before you take the leap.
Blurb Process
You're flying a little blind if you're taking Gerrit Cole here, and you'll need an injury slot or a tough stomach to make it to June, when the Yankees say they expect him back. Could you then get 120 excellent innings? Sure, he's been a metronome, one of the highest-floor pitchers in the sport. He was durable before this injury, too, so you could talk yourself into the likelihood that he doesn't have a setback. But, unlike a Kyle Bradish in 2025 or a Jacob deGrom in 2024, you won't have seen Cole on the mound, demonstrating the return of his stuff, before you take the leap.
You're flying a little blind if you're taking Gerrit Cole here, and you'll need an injury slot or a tough stomach to make it to June, when the Yankees say they expect him back. Could you then get 120 excellent innings? Sure, he's been a metronome, one of the highest-floor pitchers in the sport. He was durable before this injury, too, so you could talk yourself into the likelihood that he doesn't have a setback. But, unlike a Kyle Bradish in 2025 or a Jacob deGrom in 2024, you won't have seen Cole on the mound, demonstrating the return of his stuff, before you take the leap.
Proj. IP
119
ppERA
3.59
ppK%
25.7%
NYY
60

Braxton Ashcraft

105 Stuff+
3.73 ppERA
Blurb Process
Until last season, Braxton Ashcraft's injury history and poor four-seam shape seemed to suggest a future in the bullpen despite his legendary breaking ball. But then he added a sinker, gradually added bulk to his outings and maintained a 97-mph fastball even in longer outings. Now he looks like a legitimate starter, allbeit with injury concerns, since he's had Tommy John surgery, knee problems, surgery to his non-throwing shoulder and a bout of forearm and elbow tightness that limited him in 2024. Hey, most pitchers have injury concerns. Smoke 'em while you got 'em.
Blurb Process
Until last season, Braxton Ashcraft's injury history and poor four-seam shape seemed to suggest a future in the bullpen despite his legendary breaking ball. But then he added a sinker, gradually added bulk to his outings and maintained a 97-mph fastball even in longer outings. Now he looks like a legitimate starter, allbeit with injury concerns, since he's had Tommy John surgery, knee problems, surgery to his non-throwing shoulder and a bout of forearm and elbow tightness that limited him in 2024. Hey, most pitchers have injury concerns. Smoke 'em while you got 'em.
Until last season, Braxton Ashcraft's injury history and poor four-seam shape seemed to suggest a future in the bullpen despite his legendary breaking ball. But then he added a sinker, gradually added bulk to his outings and maintained a 97-mph fastball even in longer outings. Now he looks like a legitimate starter, allbeit with injury concerns, since he's had Tommy John surgery, knee problems, surgery to his non-throwing shoulder and a bout of forearm and elbow tightness that limited him in 2024. Hey, most pitchers have injury concerns. Smoke 'em while you got 'em.
Stuff+
105
Location+
99
Pitching+
103
Health
77%
Proj. IP
131
ppERA
3.73
ppK%
22.2%
PIT
61

Bryce Miller

102 Stuff+
3.82 ppERA
Blurb Process
The stuff will still there for pretty much every pitch type that Bryce Miller threw in 2025. What was missing was the command. After showing above-average Location+ on five of his six pitches in 2024, the righty saw that number go down everywhere last year. In season, he was frustrated with that fact but kept feeling that it was going to come back any day. Maybe the injuries contributed to the fact that it never really got any better. Apparently he's put on a bunch of weight and is throwing harder this offseason, but from a statistical standpoint it's just as noteworthy that stuff is stickier year to year than command. At the very least, you'll have a pitcher who will be a beast at home, with a 3.34 career ERA in Seattle.
Blurb Process
The stuff will still there for pretty much every pitch type that Bryce Miller threw in 2025. What was missing was the command. After showing above-average Location+ on five of his six pitches in 2024, the righty saw that number go down everywhere last year. In season, he was frustrated with that fact but kept feeling that it was going to come back any day. Maybe the injuries contributed to the fact that it never really got any better. Apparently he's put on a bunch of weight and is throwing harder this offseason, but from a statistical standpoint it's just as noteworthy that stuff is stickier year to year than command. At the very least, you'll have a pitcher who will be a beast at home, with a 3.34 career ERA in Seattle.
The stuff will still there for pretty much every pitch type that Bryce Miller threw in 2025. What was missing was the command. After showing above-average Location+ on five of his six pitches in 2024, the righty saw that number go down everywhere last year. In season, he was frustrated with that fact but kept feeling that it was going to come back any day. Maybe the injuries contributed to the fact that it never really got any better. Apparently he's put on a bunch of weight and is throwing harder this offseason, but from a statistical standpoint it's just as noteworthy that stuff is stickier year to year than command. At the very least, you'll have a pitcher who will be a beast at home, with a 3.34 career ERA in Seattle.
Stuff+
102
Location+
97
Pitching+
99
Health
81%
Proj. IP
151
ppERA
3.82
ppK%
21.9%
SEA
62

Grayson Rodriguez

#N/A
3.41 ppERA
Blurb Process
The final nail in the 2025 coffin doesn't sound all that bad. Bone spur surgery. But Grayson Rodriguez still managed to miss the entire season with an amalgam of afflictions. A lat strain. Shoulder soress. Triceps soreness. The bottom line is that the stuff is tantalizing — though changeup-forward, which can be dicey for a righty — and the health is still a question mark. Expect Rodriguez to move up draft boards if he's throwing and looks good this spring, but even if he's healthy in March it doesn't mean he'll throw more than 100 or 120 innings. He's been dealing with these injuries for a while.
Blurb Process
The final nail in the 2025 coffin doesn't sound all that bad. Bone spur surgery. But Grayson Rodriguez still managed to miss the entire season with an amalgam of afflictions. A lat strain. Shoulder soress. Triceps soreness. The bottom line is that the stuff is tantalizing — though changeup-forward, which can be dicey for a righty — and the health is still a question mark. Expect Rodriguez to move up draft boards if he's throwing and looks good this spring, but even if he's healthy in March it doesn't mean he'll throw more than 100 or 120 innings. He's been dealing with these injuries for a while.
The final nail in the 2025 coffin doesn't sound all that bad. Bone spur surgery. But Grayson Rodriguez still managed to miss the entire season with an amalgam of afflictions. A lat strain. Shoulder soress. Triceps soreness. The bottom line is that the stuff is tantalizing — though changeup-forward, which can be dicey for a righty — and the health is still a question mark. Expect Rodriguez to move up draft boards if he's throwing and looks good this spring, but even if he's healthy in March it doesn't mean he'll throw more than 100 or 120 innings. He's been dealing with these injuries for a while.
Proj. IP
113
ppERA
3.41
ppK%
26.9%
LAA
63

Joey Cantillo

101 Stuff+
3.88 ppERA
Blurb Process
The new Stuff+ update confirms what we probably already knew about Joey Cantillo: it's a plus changeup and a plus curveball for the Guardians' lefty. But the flaws are still there, too. He didn't locate any of his three primary pitches at an above-average rate, which fits with his minor-league walk rates and prospect command grades. He also should probably get a worse health grade than we see here since his minor league tenure was innings-light at times. In 2024, as an example, he put together just over 78 innings total between the big leagues and the minors. If you don't pencil him in for a ton of innings, and stay aware of the command issues, though, you'll see a nice sleeper in that Cleveland rotation.
Blurb Process
The new Stuff+ update confirms what we probably already knew about Joey Cantillo: it's a plus changeup and a plus curveball for the Guardians' lefty. But the flaws are still there, too. He didn't locate any of his three primary pitches at an above-average rate, which fits with his minor-league walk rates and prospect command grades. He also should probably get a worse health grade than we see here since his minor league tenure was innings-light at times. In 2024, as an example, he put together just over 78 innings total between the big leagues and the minors. If you don't pencil him in for a ton of innings, and stay aware of the command issues, though, you'll see a nice sleeper in that Cleveland rotation.
The new Stuff+ update confirms what we probably already knew about Joey Cantillo: it's a plus changeup and a plus curveball for the Guardians' lefty. But the flaws are still there, too. He didn't locate any of his three primary pitches at an above-average rate, which fits with his minor-league walk rates and prospect command grades. He also should probably get a worse health grade than we see here since his minor league tenure was innings-light at times. In 2024, as an example, he put together just over 78 innings total between the big leagues and the minors. If you don't pencil him in for a ton of innings, and stay aware of the command issues, though, you'll see a nice sleeper in that Cleveland rotation.
Stuff+
101
Location+
97
Pitching+
98
Health
88%
Proj. IP
143
ppERA
3.88
ppK%
24.2%
CLE
64

Kris Bubic

96 Stuff+
4.08 ppERA
Blurb Process
No model — be it Stuff+, ERA estimators, strikeouts minus walks — thought Kris Bubic earned all of that spectacular 2.55 ERA last year. His strikeout and walk rates were barely above average, his velocity was below-average and the stuff models really only liked his fastball and changeup. Throwing an 83-mph sweeper left-on-right should theoretically be a bad idea since that pitch has big platoon splits, but righties only slugged .292 when they hit it. Maybe the arsenal worked because he has good command, or maybe the sweeper and changeup were tunneling off each other and hard to see, but it obviously worked. For a year. Expect something closer to his career 4.14 ERA.
Blurb Process
No model — be it Stuff+, ERA estimators, strikeouts minus walks — thought Kris Bubic earned all of that spectacular 2.55 ERA last year. His strikeout and walk rates were barely above average, his velocity was below-average and the stuff models really only liked his fastball and changeup. Throwing an 83-mph sweeper left-on-right should theoretically be a bad idea since that pitch has big platoon splits, but righties only slugged .292 when they hit it. Maybe the arsenal worked because he has good command, or maybe the sweeper and changeup were tunneling off each other and hard to see, but it obviously worked. For a year. Expect something closer to his career 4.14 ERA.
No model — be it Stuff+, ERA estimators, strikeouts minus walks — thought Kris Bubic earned all of that spectacular 2.55 ERA last year. His strikeout and walk rates were barely above average, his velocity was below-average and the stuff models really only liked his fastball and changeup. Throwing an 83-mph sweeper left-on-right should theoretically be a bad idea since that pitch has big platoon splits, but righties only slugged .292 when they hit it. Maybe the arsenal worked because he has good command, or maybe the sweeper and changeup were tunneling off each other and hard to see, but it obviously worked. For a year. Expect something closer to his career 4.14 ERA.
Stuff+
96
Location+
101
Pitching+
100
Health
72%
Proj. IP
135
ppERA
4.08
ppK%
21.8%
KCR
65

Trevor Rogers

97 Stuff+
4.3 ppERA
Blurb Process
There are a lot commonalities between Trevor Rogers and Kris Bubic. Both have been up and down in their careers, both have seen their below-average velocity fluctuate, both outpaced the models significantly last year and both lefties throw sweepers and changeups low in the zone. When I quizzed him on his breakout mid-season, Rogers wondered if batters saw pitches down, assumed they were changeups, and then took what was actually the sweeper for called strikes. Modelers mostly think of tunneling as happening off the fastball, so that could be a way to outperform the metrics. But even just last year, Rogers had an ERA over five in the minor leagues on his way up, and there's precious little there to hang your hat on in the peripherals. Something closer to his career ERA (3.83) and WHIP (1.30) would make more sense for him in 2026.
Blurb Process
There are a lot commonalities between Trevor Rogers and Kris Bubic. Both have been up and down in their careers, both have seen their below-average velocity fluctuate, both outpaced the models significantly last year and both lefties throw sweepers and changeups low in the zone. When I quizzed him on his breakout mid-season, Rogers wondered if batters saw pitches down, assumed they were changeups, and then took what was actually the sweeper for called strikes. Modelers mostly think of tunneling as happening off the fastball, so that could be a way to outperform the metrics. But even just last year, Rogers had an ERA over five in the minor leagues on his way up, and there's precious little there to hang your hat on in the peripherals. Something closer to his career ERA (3.83) and WHIP (1.30) would make more sense for him in 2026.
There are a lot commonalities between Trevor Rogers and Kris Bubic. Both have been up and down in their careers, both have seen their below-average velocity fluctuate, both outpaced the models significantly last year and both lefties throw sweepers and changeups low in the zone. When I quizzed him on his breakout mid-season, Rogers wondered if batters saw pitches down, assumed they were changeups, and then took what was actually the sweeper for called strikes. Modelers mostly think of tunneling as happening off the fastball, so that could be a way to outperform the metrics. But even just last year, Rogers had an ERA over five in the minor leagues on his way up, and there's precious little there to hang your hat on in the peripherals. Something closer to his career ERA (3.83) and WHIP (1.30) would make more sense for him in 2026.
Stuff+
97
Location+
103
Pitching+
100
Health
84%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.30
ppK%
20.3%
BAL
66

Matthew Boyd

99 Stuff+
4.1 ppERA
Blurb Process
Another relatively low velocity lefty with good command makes this a mini tier! But Matthew Boyd actually saw career-best velocity in 2025, and at least the stuff models thought his secondaries were above-average. The fit with Wrigley — which suppresses right-handed offense — was a good one for Boyd, who had an ERA that was almost a run and a half lower at home than on the road. Using him heavily at home during the cold early season, and then perhaps shopping him if your league allows such a thing, might be a decent idea. Boyd's production sagged in the second half along with his fastball velocity.
Blurb Process
Another relatively low velocity lefty with good command makes this a mini tier! But Matthew Boyd actually saw career-best velocity in 2025, and at least the stuff models thought his secondaries were above-average. The fit with Wrigley — which suppresses right-handed offense — was a good one for Boyd, who had an ERA that was almost a run and a half lower at home than on the road. Using him heavily at home during the cold early season, and then perhaps shopping him if your league allows such a thing, might be a decent idea. Boyd's production sagged in the second half along with his fastball velocity.
Another relatively low velocity lefty with good command makes this a mini tier! But Matthew Boyd actually saw career-best velocity in 2025, and at least the stuff models thought his secondaries were above-average. The fit with Wrigley — which suppresses right-handed offense — was a good one for Boyd, who had an ERA that was almost a run and a half lower at home than on the road. Using him heavily at home during the cold early season, and then perhaps shopping him if your league allows such a thing, might be a decent idea. Boyd's production sagged in the second half along with his fastball velocity.
Stuff+
99
Location+
106
Pitching+
101
Health
72%
Proj. IP
155
ppERA
4.10
ppK%
21.7%
CHC
67

Troy Melton

103 Stuff+
4 ppERA
Blurb Process
Troy Melton checks all the boxes. Standout stuff on at least three pitches? Check. A wide arsenal? Check. Decent command of at least a hard pitch or two? Check. Prospect pedigree? Check. This big right-hander has graced top 100 lists, sits 97 on the fastball, and boasts both a splitter and cutter that look like legit out-pitches. While he didn't have the greatest overall command grades as a prospect or in his debut, Location+ says he can place the sinker, cutter and slider well enough to get strikes when he needs them. It's definitely weird that he didn't strike a lot of guys out, especially on the heels of teammate Jackson Jobe's similar struggles with the whiffs. But Melton seems poised for success, in a park that gives him a high floor.
Blurb Process
Troy Melton checks all the boxes. Standout stuff on at least three pitches? Check. A wide arsenal? Check. Decent command of at least a hard pitch or two? Check. Prospect pedigree? Check. This big right-hander has graced top 100 lists, sits 97 on the fastball, and boasts both a splitter and cutter that look like legit out-pitches. While he didn't have the greatest overall command grades as a prospect or in his debut, Location+ says he can place the sinker, cutter and slider well enough to get strikes when he needs them. It's definitely weird that he didn't strike a lot of guys out, especially on the heels of teammate Jackson Jobe's similar struggles with the whiffs. But Melton seems poised for success, in a park that gives him a high floor.
Troy Melton checks all the boxes. Standout stuff on at least three pitches? Check. A wide arsenal? Check. Decent command of at least a hard pitch or two? Check. Prospect pedigree? Check. This big right-hander has graced top 100 lists, sits 97 on the fastball, and boasts both a splitter and cutter that look like legit out-pitches. While he didn't have the greatest overall command grades as a prospect or in his debut, Location+ says he can place the sinker, cutter and slider well enough to get strikes when he needs them. It's definitely weird that he didn't strike a lot of guys out, especially on the heels of teammate Jackson Jobe's similar struggles with the whiffs. But Melton seems poised for success, in a park that gives him a high floor.
Stuff+
103
Location+
98
Pitching+
102
Health
76%
Proj. IP
133
ppERA
4.00
ppK%
22.5%
DET
68

Shane Baz

104 Stuff+
4.02 ppERA
Blurb Process
Shane Baz was bad last year. At home at least. In that minor-league park that featured pitch-altering and fly-ball helping wind patterns, he had a 5.90 ERA and gave up 18 homers. But on the road, he gave up less than half that many in a similar amount of innings and had a 3.86 ERA. His strikeout and walk numbers were nearly identical home and away (and both pretty good), and his ERA estimators sat under 4.00. The righty features a strong 97-mph fastball and a killer knuckle curve, but spent half the year throwing a slider middle/middle before converting to a cutter that went to better locations. Another year out from surgery, in a new park, with a new lease on life and a great offense behind him — it's a good time to buy low on Baz.
Blurb Process
Shane Baz was bad last year. At home at least. In that minor-league park that featured pitch-altering and fly-ball helping wind patterns, he had a 5.90 ERA and gave up 18 homers. But on the road, he gave up less than half that many in a similar amount of innings and had a 3.86 ERA. His strikeout and walk numbers were nearly identical home and away (and both pretty good), and his ERA estimators sat under 4.00. The righty features a strong 97-mph fastball and a killer knuckle curve, but spent half the year throwing a slider middle/middle before converting to a cutter that went to better locations. Another year out from surgery, in a new park, with a new lease on life and a great offense behind him — it's a good time to buy low on Baz.
Shane Baz was bad last year. At home at least. In that minor-league park that featured pitch-altering and fly-ball helping wind patterns, he had a 5.90 ERA and gave up 18 homers. But on the road, he gave up less than half that many in a similar amount of innings and had a 3.86 ERA. His strikeout and walk numbers were nearly identical home and away (and both pretty good), and his ERA estimators sat under 4.00. The righty features a strong 97-mph fastball and a killer knuckle curve, but spent half the year throwing a slider middle/middle before converting to a cutter that went to better locations. Another year out from surgery, in a new park, with a new lease on life and a great offense behind him — it's a good time to buy low on Baz.
Stuff+
104
Location+
101
Pitching+
106
Health
74%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.02
ppK%
23.8%
BAL
69

Shota Imanaga

98 Stuff+
4.34 ppERA
Blurb Process
The year-long surface-level numbers for Shota Imanaga don't seem to suggest there's a problem here. A 3.73 ERA with a 0.99 WHIP looks pretty good. But a little digging produces some issues. He dropped to a 90.8-mph fastball velocity — fourth worst among pitchers with 140+ innings last year — and he also lost nearly 5 percentage points off his strikeout rate year over year. In the second half, his ERA jumped to nearly 5.00 and his home run rate was over 2 per nine innings. He doesn't have a particurarly wide arsenal to fall back on, and when he needs a strike he generally goes to the four-seamer. That four-seamer allowed a .567 slugging in 2025. Hence the offseason contract issues. Still, he landed in a good place, and he could get some of the zip back and still be a good early-season play as a lefty in Wrigley.
Blurb Process
The year-long surface-level numbers for Shota Imanaga don't seem to suggest there's a problem here. A 3.73 ERA with a 0.99 WHIP looks pretty good. But a little digging produces some issues. He dropped to a 90.8-mph fastball velocity — fourth worst among pitchers with 140+ innings last year — and he also lost nearly 5 percentage points off his strikeout rate year over year. In the second half, his ERA jumped to nearly 5.00 and his home run rate was over 2 per nine innings. He doesn't have a particurarly wide arsenal to fall back on, and when he needs a strike he generally goes to the four-seamer. That four-seamer allowed a .567 slugging in 2025. Hence the offseason contract issues. Still, he landed in a good place, and he could get some of the zip back and still be a good early-season play as a lefty in Wrigley.
The year-long surface-level numbers for Shota Imanaga don't seem to suggest there's a problem here. A 3.73 ERA with a 0.99 WHIP looks pretty good. But a little digging produces some issues. He dropped to a 90.8-mph fastball velocity — fourth worst among pitchers with 140+ innings last year — and he also lost nearly 5 percentage points off his strikeout rate year over year. In the second half, his ERA jumped to nearly 5.00 and his home run rate was over 2 per nine innings. He doesn't have a particurarly wide arsenal to fall back on, and when he needs a strike he generally goes to the four-seamer. That four-seamer allowed a .567 slugging in 2025. Hence the offseason contract issues. Still, he landed in a good place, and he could get some of the zip back and still be a good early-season play as a lefty in Wrigley.
Stuff+
98
Location+
107
Pitching+
105
Health
92%
Proj. IP
149
ppERA
4.34
ppK%
21.5%
CHC
70

Sean Manaea

110 Stuff+
3.82 ppERA
Blurb Process
A radical in-season arm slot change in 2024 revitalized Sean Manaea by making his fastball more deceptive. His strikeout rate went up, his stuff numbers looked better and for a while the results were commensurate with the peripherals. His 2025 season continued that progression in the secondary numbers, but the ERA wasn't there. Mostly because he gave up a ton of homers. Some of that could be luck, some of that could've been spotty command due to loose bodies in his elbow and some of that could've been due to the fact that he's mostly a two-pitch pitcher, and his fastball is clearly his best pitch. The good news is that he didn't need surgery for the elbow, he feels good now and he has a rotation spot in a pitcher's park.
Blurb Process
A radical in-season arm slot change in 2024 revitalized Sean Manaea by making his fastball more deceptive. His strikeout rate went up, his stuff numbers looked better and for a while the results were commensurate with the peripherals. His 2025 season continued that progression in the secondary numbers, but the ERA wasn't there. Mostly because he gave up a ton of homers. Some of that could be luck, some of that could've been spotty command due to loose bodies in his elbow and some of that could've been due to the fact that he's mostly a two-pitch pitcher, and his fastball is clearly his best pitch. The good news is that he didn't need surgery for the elbow, he feels good now and he has a rotation spot in a pitcher's park.
A radical in-season arm slot change in 2024 revitalized Sean Manaea by making his fastball more deceptive. His strikeout rate went up, his stuff numbers looked better and for a while the results were commensurate with the peripherals. His 2025 season continued that progression in the secondary numbers, but the ERA wasn't there. Mostly because he gave up a ton of homers. Some of that could be luck, some of that could've been spotty command due to loose bodies in his elbow and some of that could've been due to the fact that he's mostly a two-pitch pitcher, and his fastball is clearly his best pitch. The good news is that he didn't need surgery for the elbow, he feels good now and he has a rotation spot in a pitcher's park.
Stuff+
110
Location+
101
Pitching+
106
Health
73%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
3.82
ppK%
24.2%
NYM
71

Quinn Priester

96 Stuff+
3.89 ppERA
Blurb Process
The sinker has always been a good pitch for Quinn Priester, but putting the pieces together around it has been the struggle. A new cutter might have pulled the room together. Kind of a cut-ride fastball, it allowed him to take some pressure off the sinker, which is why that pitch had the best slugging numbers of his career. (That's also why slugging numbers on pitches aren't sticky year to year, but that's another story.) Sinker, slider, cutter is not the most common of arsenals, and it doesn't always allow Priester to go deep into games, but it is something the Brewers have tried with other pitchers (like Chad Patrick) with some success. It seems like a delicate balance he's found, but it's a balance nonetheless.
Blurb Process
The sinker has always been a good pitch for Quinn Priester, but putting the pieces together around it has been the struggle. A new cutter might have pulled the room together. Kind of a cut-ride fastball, it allowed him to take some pressure off the sinker, which is why that pitch had the best slugging numbers of his career. (That's also why slugging numbers on pitches aren't sticky year to year, but that's another story.) Sinker, slider, cutter is not the most common of arsenals, and it doesn't always allow Priester to go deep into games, but it is something the Brewers have tried with other pitchers (like Chad Patrick) with some success. It seems like a delicate balance he's found, but it's a balance nonetheless.
The sinker has always been a good pitch for Quinn Priester, but putting the pieces together around it has been the struggle. A new cutter might have pulled the room together. Kind of a cut-ride fastball, it allowed him to take some pressure off the sinker, which is why that pitch had the best slugging numbers of his career. (That's also why slugging numbers on pitches aren't sticky year to year, but that's another story.) Sinker, slider, cutter is not the most common of arsenals, and it doesn't always allow Priester to go deep into games, but it is something the Brewers have tried with other pitchers (like Chad Patrick) with some success. It seems like a delicate balance he's found, but it's a balance nonetheless.
Stuff+
96
Location+
98
Pitching+
94
Health
89%
Proj. IP
172
ppERA
3.89
ppK%
20.7%
MIL
72

Zebby Matthews

101 Stuff+
3.84 ppERA
Blurb Process
By the Stuff+ model, Zebby Matthews is a can't-miss, bonafide, top-of-the-line sleeper. His fastball and slider are elite on that scale among starting pitchers, his sinker and curveball are average, and his cutter and changeup are good enough to use. That gives him a wide arsenal with above-average Location+ to boot. And ... he had an ERA over 5.00 last year. But the strikeout and walk rates were pretty good, the velo was good (95+) and his movement patterns are unconventional. He'll be on at least one of my breakout lists.
Blurb Process
By the Stuff+ model, Zebby Matthews is a can't-miss, bonafide, top-of-the-line sleeper. His fastball and slider are elite on that scale among starting pitchers, his sinker and curveball are average, and his cutter and changeup are good enough to use. That gives him a wide arsenal with above-average Location+ to boot. And ... he had an ERA over 5.00 last year. But the strikeout and walk rates were pretty good, the velo was good (95+) and his movement patterns are unconventional. He'll be on at least one of my breakout lists.
By the Stuff+ model, Zebby Matthews is a can't-miss, bonafide, top-of-the-line sleeper. His fastball and slider are elite on that scale among starting pitchers, his sinker and curveball are average, and his cutter and changeup are good enough to use. That gives him a wide arsenal with above-average Location+ to boot. And ... he had an ERA over 5.00 last year. But the strikeout and walk rates were pretty good, the velo was good (95+) and his movement patterns are unconventional. He'll be on at least one of my breakout lists.
Stuff+
101
Location+
106
Pitching+
106
Health
77%
Proj. IP
131
ppERA
3.84
ppK%
23.7%
MIN
73

David Peterson

91 Stuff+
3.97 ppERA
Blurb Process
Shoutout to the guys that are just … fine. David Peterson has now thrown over 600 career innings with an ERA of 4.12 against a SIERA of 4.14, with almost exactly average strikeout and walk rates. Following along his career, it's probably felt a lot more tumultous than that, with mutliple years with an ERA over 5.00, season halves that seemed dominant and seaosn halves where he lost his job in the rotation. But over time, using the long distance lens, he's been fine. For his career, he has a 3.70 ERA at home, his team should give him some wins and he should give you 100-120 usable innings in there. The deeper your league, the more guys you should have like this sprinkled in with your sleepers. Think of the floor!
Blurb Process
Shoutout to the guys that are just … fine. David Peterson has now thrown over 600 career innings with an ERA of 4.12 against a SIERA of 4.14, with almost exactly average strikeout and walk rates. Following along his career, it's probably felt a lot more tumultous than that, with mutliple years with an ERA over 5.00, season halves that seemed dominant and seaosn halves where he lost his job in the rotation. But over time, using the long distance lens, he's been fine. For his career, he has a 3.70 ERA at home, his team should give him some wins and he should give you 100-120 usable innings in there. The deeper your league, the more guys you should have like this sprinkled in with your sleepers. Think of the floor!
Shoutout to the guys that are just … fine. David Peterson has now thrown over 600 career innings with an ERA of 4.12 against a SIERA of 4.14, with almost exactly average strikeout and walk rates. Following along his career, it's probably felt a lot more tumultous than that, with mutliple years with an ERA over 5.00, season halves that seemed dominant and seaosn halves where he lost his job in the rotation. But over time, using the long distance lens, he's been fine. For his career, he has a 3.70 ERA at home, his team should give him some wins and he should give you 100-120 usable innings in there. The deeper your league, the more guys you should have like this sprinkled in with your sleepers. Think of the floor!
Stuff+
91
Location+
102
Pitching+
96
Health
88%
Proj. IP
177
ppERA
3.97
ppK%
20.5%
NYM
74

Jared Jones

#N/A
3.81 ppERA
Blurb Process
Jared Jones debuted with all sorts of flames coming out of his elbow in 2024. Those flames consumed his elbow eventually, and he lost all of last season to recovery from surgery. Jones threw harder as he approached the big leagues, and hardest in Pittsburgh, probably in an effort to prove he belonged. Now that he's had some success, where will he sit with the fastball? Will he throw more curveballs and changeups just to take the pressure of his best two pitches? What will his command look like in Year 1 back? How will they manage his innings? Considerable stuff, countless questions regarding where he fits.
Blurb Process
Jared Jones debuted with all sorts of flames coming out of his elbow in 2024. Those flames consumed his elbow eventually, and he lost all of last season to recovery from surgery. Jones threw harder as he approached the big leagues, and hardest in Pittsburgh, probably in an effort to prove he belonged. Now that he's had some success, where will he sit with the fastball? Will he throw more curveballs and changeups just to take the pressure of his best two pitches? What will his command look like in Year 1 back? How will they manage his innings? Considerable stuff, countless questions regarding where he fits.
Jared Jones debuted with all sorts of flames coming out of his elbow in 2024. Those flames consumed his elbow eventually, and he lost all of last season to recovery from surgery. Jones threw harder as he approached the big leagues, and hardest in Pittsburgh, probably in an effort to prove he belonged. Now that he's had some success, where will he sit with the fastball? Will he throw more curveballs and changeups just to take the pressure of his best two pitches? What will his command look like in Year 1 back? How will they manage his innings? Considerable stuff, countless questions regarding where he fits.
Proj. IP
105
ppERA
3.81
ppK%
24.2%
PIT
75

Joe Boyle

106 Stuff+
3.6 ppERA
Blurb Process
Joe Boyle has stuff. He sits 99 mph, and though his un-adjusted ride doesn't seem all that interesting, he lowered his arm angle and actually gets an inch or two of ride over the expecation his new arm angle creates. He sits 93 on the splitter, which would be second only to Paul Skenes among qualified pitchers. He sits 91 on the slider, which would give him the fastest slider among qualified pitchers. Due to injuries and bad command, he's never been a qualified pitcher, and in Tampa he may not accrue a ton of innings either. But with their one-target system and his new arm angle, Boyle may be primed to put together a year that his Stuff+ always suggested he could. Think of the ceiling!
Blurb Process
Joe Boyle has stuff. He sits 99 mph, and though his un-adjusted ride doesn't seem all that interesting, he lowered his arm angle and actually gets an inch or two of ride over the expecation his new arm angle creates. He sits 93 on the splitter, which would be second only to Paul Skenes among qualified pitchers. He sits 91 on the slider, which would give him the fastest slider among qualified pitchers. Due to injuries and bad command, he's never been a qualified pitcher, and in Tampa he may not accrue a ton of innings either. But with their one-target system and his new arm angle, Boyle may be primed to put together a year that his Stuff+ always suggested he could. Think of the ceiling!
Joe Boyle has stuff. He sits 99 mph, and though his un-adjusted ride doesn't seem all that interesting, he lowered his arm angle and actually gets an inch or two of ride over the expecation his new arm angle creates. He sits 93 on the splitter, which would be second only to Paul Skenes among qualified pitchers. He sits 91 on the slider, which would give him the fastest slider among qualified pitchers. Due to injuries and bad command, he's never been a qualified pitcher, and in Tampa he may not accrue a ton of innings either. But with their one-target system and his new arm angle, Boyle may be primed to put together a year that his Stuff+ always suggested he could. Think of the ceiling!
Stuff+
106
Location+
87
Pitching+
95
Health
74%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
3.60
ppK%
27.3%
TBR
76

MacKenzie Gore

99 Stuff+
3.78 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
98
Pitching+
99
Health
87%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
3.78
ppK%
26.4%
TEX
77

José Soriano

103 Stuff+
3.59 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
102
Pitching+
106
Health
83%
Proj. IP
151
ppERA
3.59
ppK%
22.2%
LAA
78

Will Warren

103 Stuff+
3.88 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
97
Pitching+
102
Health
89%
Proj. IP
169
ppERA
3.88
ppK%
23.1%
NYY
79

Logan Henderson

102 Stuff+
3.89 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
102
Location+
109
Pitching+
107
Health
76%
Proj. IP
133
ppERA
3.89
ppK%
24.8%
MIL
80

Reese Olson

92 Stuff+
3.91 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
102
Pitching+
96
Health
74%
Proj. IP
128
ppERA
3.91
ppK%
22.0%
DET
81

Joe Musgrove

#N/A
3.77 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
113
ppERA
3.77
ppK%
22.7%
SDP
82

Shane McClanahan

#N/A
3.92 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
109
ppERA
3.92
ppK%
23.2%
TBR
83

Kodai Senga

93 Stuff+
4.05 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
93
Location+
95
Pitching+
92
Health
68%
Proj. IP
101
ppERA
4.05
ppK%
23.0%
NYM
84

Ryan Weathers

104 Stuff+
3.89 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
104
Location+
105
Pitching+
108
Health
65%
Proj. IP
137
ppERA
3.89
ppK%
23.3%
NYY
85

Jack Leiter

103 Stuff+
4.08 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
93
Pitching+
98
Health
84%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
4.08
ppK%
23.7%
TEX
86

Reid Detmers

115 Stuff+
3.45 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
115
Location+
110
Pitching+
122
Proj. IP
141
ppERA
3.45
ppK%
27.3%
LAA
87

Parker Messick

99 Stuff+
4.1 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
108
Pitching+
107
Health
81%
Proj. IP
142
ppERA
4.10
ppK%
21.4%
CLE
88

Mike Burrows

94 Stuff+
4.05 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
100
Pitching+
97
Health
81%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.05
ppK%
23.6%
HOU
89

Cody Ponce

#N/A
4.07 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
162
ppERA
4.07
ppK%
23.0%
TOR
90

Ryne Nelson

106 Stuff+
4.12 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
106
Location+
100
Pitching+
105
Health
85%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.12
ppK%
20.7%
ARI
91

Casey Mize

94 Stuff+
4.13 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
107
Pitching+
102
Health
77%
Proj. IP
142
ppERA
4.13
ppK%
20.7%
DET
92

Zac Gallen

92 Stuff+
4.21 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
105
Pitching+
99
Health
90%
Proj. IP
191
ppERA
4.21
ppK%
21.8%
93

Merrill Kelly

92 Stuff+
4.35 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
103
Pitching+
98
Health
79%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
4.35
ppK%
20.7%
ARI
94

Steven Matz

104 Stuff+
3.81 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
104
Location+
110
Pitching+
109
Proj. IP
121
ppERA
3.81
ppK%
21.3%
TBR
95

Clay Holmes

100 Stuff+
4.13 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
100
Location+
100
Pitching+
102
Health
82%
Proj. IP
173
ppERA
4.13
ppK%
18.8%
NYM
96

Yusei Kikuchi

98 Stuff+
4.09 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
98
Location+
105
Pitching+
105
Health
89%
Proj. IP
175
ppERA
4.09
ppK%
23.3%
LAA
97

Luis Gil

97 Stuff+
4.39 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
97
Location+
95
Pitching+
95
Health
72%
Proj. IP
111
ppERA
4.39
ppK%
22.6%
NYY
98

Dustin May

98 Stuff+
4.39 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
98
Location+
96
Pitching+
94
Health
60%
Proj. IP
139
ppERA
4.39
ppK%
20.1%
STL
99

Chad Patrick

105 Stuff+
4 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
105
Location+
99
Pitching+
102
Health
83%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.00
ppK%
23.0%
MIL
100

Andrew Painter

#N/A
4.47 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
131
ppERA
4.47
ppK%
20.1%
PHI
101

Brayan Bello

94 Stuff+
4.42 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
102
Pitching+
96
Health
88%
Proj. IP
178
ppERA
4.42
ppK%
19.2%
BOS
102

Zach Eflin

92 Stuff+
4.53 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
105
Pitching+
97
Health
73%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
4.53
ppK%
18.1%
BAL
103

Andrew Abbott

99 Stuff+
4.53 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
104
Pitching+
101
Health
90%
Proj. IP
175
ppERA
4.53
ppK%
21.8%
CIN
104

Noah Cameron

96 Stuff+
4.66 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
96
Location+
100
Pitching+
100
Health
88%
Proj. IP
155
ppERA
4.66
ppK%
19.2%
KCR
105

Jacob Latz

105 Stuff+
4.13 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
105
Location+
102
Pitching+
107
Proj. IP
119
ppERA
4.13
ppK%
23.1%
TEX
106

Robby Snelling

#N/A
4.15 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
111
ppERA
4.15
ppK%
21.2%
MIA
107

Roki Sasaki

91 Stuff+
4.19 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
91
Location+
91
Pitching+
84
Health
68%
Proj. IP
93
ppERA
4.19
ppK%
22.1%
LAD
108

Ian Seymour

95 Stuff+
3.95 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
99
Pitching+
95
Health
83%
Proj. IP
99
ppERA
3.95
ppK%
23.1%
TBR
109

Hunter Barco

102 Stuff+
4.1 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
102
Location+
107
Pitching+
107
Proj. IP
91
ppERA
4.10
ppK%
21.8%
PIT
110

Braxton Garrett

#N/A
3.94 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
101
ppERA
3.94
ppK%
21.2%
MIA
111

Reynaldo López

97 Stuff+
3.96 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
97
Location+
95
Pitching+
91
Health
59%
Proj. IP
99
ppERA
3.96
ppK%
24.3%
ATL
112

Landen Roupp

97 Stuff+
4.03 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
97
Location+
105
Pitching+
102
Health
81%
Proj. IP
139
ppERA
4.03
ppK%
22.1%
SFG
113

Mitch Keller

94 Stuff+
4.18 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
100
Pitching+
93
Health
93%
Proj. IP
181
ppERA
4.18
ppK%
20.7%
PIT
114

Johan Oviedo

107 Stuff+
4.26 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
107
Location+
86
Pitching+
96
Health
60%
Proj. IP
101
ppERA
4.26
ppK%
23.1%
BOS
115

Max Meyer

97 Stuff+
4.13 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
97
Location+
106
Pitching+
106
Health
66%
Proj. IP
133
ppERA
4.13
ppK%
22.0%
MIA
116

Grant Holmes

92 Stuff+
4.05 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
100
Pitching+
93
Health
78%
Proj. IP
111
ppERA
4.05
ppK%
23.9%
ATL
117

Slade Cecconi

93 Stuff+
4.29 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
93
Location+
104
Pitching+
95
Health
86%
Proj. IP
173
ppERA
4.29
ppK%
19.8%
CLE
118

Hurston Waldrep

99 Stuff+
4.3 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
99
Pitching+
103
Health
76%
Proj. IP
138
ppERA
4.30
ppK%
20.8%
ATL
119

Cade Cavalli

103 Stuff+
4.2 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
98
Pitching+
103
Health
56%
Proj. IP
129
ppERA
4.20
ppK%
19.8%
WSN
120

Spencer Arrighetti

102 Stuff+
4.38 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
102
Location+
93
Pitching+
96
Health
78%
Proj. IP
111
ppERA
4.38
ppK%
22.5%
HOU
121

Tyler Mahle

92 Stuff+
4.36 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
111
Pitching+
102
Health
57%
Proj. IP
131
ppERA
4.36
ppK%
19.2%
SFG
122

Brady Singer

95 Stuff+
4.32 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
100
Pitching+
95
Health
94%
Proj. IP
182
ppERA
4.32
ppK%
21.4%
CIN
123

Seth Lugo

93 Stuff+
4.83 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
93
Location+
96
Pitching+
90
Health
82%
Proj. IP
160
ppERA
4.83
ppK%
18.6%
KCR
124

Cristian Javier

95 Stuff+
4.9 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
96
Pitching+
92
Health
64%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.90
ppK%
20.3%
HOU
125

Taj Bradley

101 Stuff+
4.11 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
101
Location+
92
Pitching+
94
Health
88%
Proj. IP
115
ppERA
4.11
ppK%
22.9%
MIN
126

Jonah Tong

99 Stuff+
3.4 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
96
Pitching+
97
Health
77%
Proj. IP
75
ppERA
3.40
ppK%
28.2%
NYM
127

Justin Steele

103 Stuff+
3.7 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
100
Pitching+
98
Health
68%
Proj. IP
91
ppERA
3.70
ppK%
22.7%
CHC
128

Connelly Early

101 Stuff+
3.92 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
101
Location+
109
Pitching+
111
Health
78%
Proj. IP
72
ppERA
3.92
ppK%
24.0%
BOS
129

Robert Gasser

104 Stuff+
3.89 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
104
Location+
69
Pitching+
74
Health
66%
Proj. IP
79
ppERA
3.89
ppK%
22.6%
MIL
130

Brandon Sproat

106 Stuff+
4.01 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
106
Location+
86
Pitching+
90
Health
75%
Proj. IP
59
ppERA
4.01
ppK%
20.7%
MIL
131

Mick Abel

109 Stuff+
4.26 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
109
Location+
97
Pitching+
103
Health
76%
Proj. IP
75
ppERA
4.26
ppK%
22.7%
MIN
132

Kumar Rocker

94 Stuff+
3.99 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
98
Pitching+
92
Health
75%
Proj. IP
65
ppERA
3.99
ppK%
21.6%
TEX
133

Ryan Weiss

#N/A
4.31 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
95
ppERA
4.31
ppK%
23.0%
HOU
134

Jacob Lopez

98 Stuff+
4.34 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
98
Location+
101
Pitching+
99
Health
83%
Proj. IP
141
ppERA
4.34
ppK%
24.3%
ATH
135

Jameson Taillon

96 Stuff+
4.54 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
96
Location+
107
Pitching+
100
Health
74%
Proj. IP
151
ppERA
4.54
ppK%
18.8%
CHC
136

Michael Soroka

95 Stuff+
4.1 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
96
Pitching+
89
Health
62%
Proj. IP
128
ppERA
4.10
ppK%
23.1%
ARI
137

Bailey Ober

96 Stuff+
4.53 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
96
Location+
100
Pitching+
98
Health
93%
Proj. IP
155
ppERA
4.53
ppK%
20.6%
MIN
138

Justin Verlander

103 Stuff+
4.4 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
103
Location+
99
Pitching+
100
Health
63%
Proj. IP
128
ppERA
4.40
ppK%
19.9%
139

Chris Bassitt

99 Stuff+
4.3 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
99
Location+
100
Pitching+
97
Health
84%
Proj. IP
169
ppERA
4.30
ppK%
20.6%
140

Max Scherzer

92 Stuff+
4.56 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
92
Location+
110
Pitching+
103
Health
58%
Proj. IP
101
ppERA
4.56
ppK%
22.3%
141

Michael McGreevy

88 Stuff+
4.44 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
88
Location+
111
Pitching+
101
Health
87%
Proj. IP
183
ppERA
4.44
ppK%
16.4%
STL
142

Matthew Liberatore

95 Stuff+
4.69 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
101
Pitching+
96
Health
90%
Proj. IP
173
ppERA
4.69
ppK%
18.6%
STL
143

Brandon Pfaadt

96 Stuff+
4.2 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
96
Location+
104
Pitching+
101
Health
97%
Proj. IP
185
ppERA
4.20
ppK%
20.7%
ARI
144

J.T. Ginn

97 Stuff+
4.18 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
97
Location+
105
Pitching+
108
Health
81%
Proj. IP
121
ppERA
4.18
ppK%
21.8%
ATH
145

Patrick Sandoval

#N/A
4.3 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Proj. IP
101
ppERA
4.30
ppK%
20.5%
BOS
146

Michael Wacha

96 Stuff+
4.81 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
96
Location+
102
Pitching+
98
Health
79%
Proj. IP
161
ppERA
4.81
ppK%
17.7%
KCR
147

Andre Pallante

95 Stuff+
4.39 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
95
Location+
101
Pitching+
98
Health
92%
Proj. IP
179
ppERA
4.39
ppK%
17.0%
STL
148

Luis Severino

104 Stuff+
4.51 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
104
Location+
100
Pitching+
103
Health
74%
Proj. IP
175
ppERA
4.51
ppK%
19.2%
ATH
149

Richard Fitts

102 Stuff+
4.49 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
102
Location+
104
Pitching+
105
Health
72%
Proj. IP
119
ppERA
4.49
ppK%
18.2%
STL
150

Jeffrey Springs

94 Stuff+
4.96 ppERA
Blurb Process
   
Blurb Process
   
   
Stuff+
94
Location+
100
Pitching+
94
Health
73%
Proj. IP
165
ppERA
4.96
ppK%
19.0%
ATH
Eno Sarris
Senior Writer, MLB
Your Next Read
Latest League Stories
Latest headlines
Connections: Sports Edition Logo
Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition

Spot the pattern. Connect the terms

Find the hidden link between sports terms

Eno Sarris

Eno Sarris is a senior writer covering baseball analytics at The Athletic. Eno has written for FanGraphs, ESPN, Fox, MLB.com, SB Nation and others. Submit mailbag questions to esarris@theathletic.com. Follow Eno on Twitter @enosarris

Hello! We'd like to ask you a few questions about your experience with our website.