ThrowAway237s
u/ThrowAway237s
Welcome to the land of Google, they have a million other things they could be doing better.
Indeed. The idea that Android is customizable is not true, at least not without an unlocked bootloader and root access. Sure, more customizable than iOS (the only reference we have to compare it with), but still not that much.
For example, in 2014, how come Google forcibly disabled normal MicroSD write access on Android 4.4? It would have made more sense to give the device owner the choice. A simple menu option is all it would have taken.
If I can think of this, so can a gigacorporation. This means they, for whichever reason, chose not to do it.
Whichever problem that solved, it created a far bigger problem: disabling one of Android smartphones' major selling points compared to iPhones.
The same happened with mandatory pull-to-refresh since Chrome version 75. They took away the ability to turn it off, following by refusing to reinstate it after many, many complaints about accidental refreshes. They have not brought it back to this day.
I hereby release this comment into the public domain under CC0 1.0.
Absolutely. I am also annoyed by Google constantly patronizing its users. They have been doing so often, for example when they disabled normal MicroSD write access in Android 4.4 with no menu option to let the device owner decide, leaving rooting as the only option to regain this ability.
Google sometimes creates bigger problems than they solve. I would rather have some junk files on the MicroSD card that can be deleted anyway than not being able to use this major selling point of Android smartphones properly.
I see this CSS property misused so often. Is there any way to get rid of it on all websites? Just pretend it doesn't exist.
Honestly, I have no personal experience with it. I have just read in articles and discussion forums repeatedly that Btrfs is unfinished. Perhaps it is by now (unlike the similarly-named Bcachefs).
I certainly will give it a try at some point. But ext4 works just fine for me, so I see no urgent need to switch.
"Mayday - Air Crash Investigation" is a documentary series about air disasters. I predict that the following air disasters will be covered in the 27th season of Air Crash Investigation, which will be released in 2027:
-
Britannia Airways flight 226A
-
Pinnacle Airlines flight 3701
-
Dan Air flight 1008
-
Air Canada flight 621
-
United Airlines flights 1175 and 328 (shared episode).
-
Olympic Airways flight 411
Date: 2027. Evidence: These are widely known disasters not yet covered. Shared episodes have already been made in the past, like the episode "Cold Case".
Nice songs from SoundCloud suggestions: https://soundcloud.com/jupetus/whatever-lola-wants-soul-jazz
Thanks. I knew about dd (obviously), but I was unaware of this option until now. Perhaps I read the manual long ago and forgot about it. If r/TodayILearned didn't have its seventh rule ("No submissions about software/websites"), I would have posted it there. :D
But if anyone knows a way to accoplish this in-place (without creating a new file), if that is possible, that would be great.
A sparse file is created using truncate -s 100M example.bin on a file system that supports sparse files, like ext4. This will not take any space besides the file metadata, which can be checked using du -s -h example.bin.
However, is there any way to detect blank sectors (sectors with only null bytes) on a non-sparse file and mark them as sparse after the fact?
Dear DhravyaShah, have you saved the 2005 video referenced in the earlier comment by RYDANIOV? YouTube has taken it down since, so it is lost media now, after having been on YouTube for over 15 years.
i found a video in 2005 with under 1000 views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhQ-uQeyCmE
More information in this comment.
CC other active users: u/TheScientifreakPlays, u/RoseBud_XD, u/TheScientifreakPlays.
Dear Nickolas (u/TimeworksStudios),
do you still have the screen recording from this screenshot above? If so, could you please look for the URL of this video that Google omitted from the search result?
Thank you.
Without root access and an unlocked bootloader, you don't truly own your phone.
By default, Android places lots of restrictions on the user, for example they have no normal write access to the MicroSD card since Android 4.4 and USB OTG media since Android 6.
Google provided no menu option to let the user opt out of these restrictions, so rooting is the only way to gain normal access to your property.
Unfortunately, bootloader unlocking requires a factory reset, and backing up in-app data can be difficult to impossible depending on the app. By the time people learn about rooting, it tends to be too late.
Do not accept this nonsense as normal. This is an ownership violation.
I hereby release this post into the public domain ().
It will not be found anytime soon due to the lack of a pressing need for it, besides providing closure to the families, which the Malaysian government has - let's face it - little reason to care about. Besides, something like MH370 has never happened again since then, because the air traffic controllers are better prepared this time.
The overwhelming majority of signs point to a pilot suicide, specifically by captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, see the video by Green Dot Aviation.
The flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) will unlikely contain anything useful, if they are readable at all. Almost certainly, Zaharie pulled the circuitbreaker for the FDR before his vanishing act, and let the CVR run so it would overwrite itself due to the two-hour limit, destroying all evidence.
If the remote possibility that the wreckage has already been seized by some authorities but it is covered up from the public is true, then this post of course does not apply. But this post presumes that the wreckage is still at the bottom of the ocean.
Date: 2040 - 2049. Evidence: see above.
I release this post into the public domain, CC0 1.0.
Mainstream smartphone operating systems (Android and iOS) let applications arbitrarily disable screen capture, screen recording, and screen mirroring to an external display such as a television or an MHL connection to an HDMI monitor.
I am surprised smartphone users have been conditioned into accepting this ownership violation as a "normal part of life". It is not.
As a device owner, you should be able to screen-capture anything that appears on your screen, without exception. App makers have no business deciding what you can screen capture.
Two well-known examples of screenshot blocking and screen recorder blocking are the , and .
The first one probably only intended to prevent incognito mode from appearing on external displays such as a television, which is accomplished though the same feature as screenshot blocking and screen recorder blocking (). So screenshot and screen recorder blocking are apparently collateral damage.
Samsung also added the "secure" flag to their lockscreen key pad in 2023. The goal of this is to prevent it from appearing on external displays, so screenshot and screen recorder blocking are side effects. There is no reason to prevent the device owner from screen recording the keypad if they voluntarily wish to do it, which can be useful for a demonstration or bug report, using a temporary passcode.
See also my prediction on :
And regarding WhatsApp profile pictures: Screenshots of profile pictures are not privacy violations and never were, but have legitimate reasons such as preserving good memories.
Everyone knows that one should not upload something onto a visible spot on the Internet that one does not wish to be preserved by others. A profile picture is such a spot.
A privacy violation is, for example, . Here, developers are being coerced into disclosing personally identifiable details (including home address!) that they probably wished not to, in order to be able to release applications that work on most Android smartphones sold (network effect).
But a profile picture is something one voluntarily chooses to make public, and not even a mandatory requirement to be able to use WhatsApp. Not a privacy violation.
Ironically, this comes from Meta, Inc. - one of the biggest data harvesters in history.
I hereby release this post into the public domain ().
I never understood why popcorn seems to be so popular in cinemas. It tastes boring, and sometimes popcorn pieces get into your throat, drying it up.
Please limit self promotion to a single post.
Copy of title and text (for transparency):
How much of choosing a search engine is just habit?
I’ve been thinking about how most of us stick with the same search engine without really questioning it. At some point it just becomes muscle memory more than an active choice.
I tried a smaller search engine recently called Lookr. mostly out of curiosity, and it didn’t suddenly make me switch, but it did make me notice how automatic my behavior is. Even when something works fine, I still find myself going back to what I’m used to without thinking.
For people here who have actually switched search engines and stuck with it long-term, what made the difference for you? Was it something specific, or did it just happen gradually over time?
Hello. Please limit self promotion to a single post. Removed as duplicate of:
Copy of post title and content:
Why is it so hard to switch search engines, even when alternatives work fine?
I’ve been going down a bit of a rabbit hole lately, trying different search engines just to see what else is out there. Nothing serious, more of a curiosity thing.
One of the smaller ones I tried was lookr. It actually worked well enough, but what stood out wasn’t the features, it was how often I still opened my usual search engine without even thinking about it. No frustration, no big reason. Just habit doing its thing.
It made me realize that search isn’t something I consciously choose most days. It’s more like muscle memory. Even when an alternative does the job, sticking with it feels harder than expected.
For those of you who’ve actually switched and stayed with a different search engine, what made it click for you? Was there a specific moment, or did it just slowly become your default over time?
Dieses Video war der Ursprung des Spitznamen „Zahnlückenjohnny“ für Tanzverbot (Kilian Heinrich). Es kam einige Monate nach dem Video von Tanzverbot „Ansage an MontanaBlack88“ (kein verlorenes Video, außerhalb von YouTube auffindbar).
-
Original-URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ4PXUpo3Xo
-
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 23. August 2016.
While udev (automount) mounts FAT32 file systems with utf8 encoding, and mount -o iocharset=utf8 can accomplish the same effect, the Linux default with no mount options is iso8859-1.
What is the benefit of defaulting to iso8859-1?
After all, it is Microsoft who created FAT12/16/32, and they picked UTF-8 on Windows.
I predict that Mentour Pilot will soon create a documentary on Japan Air Lines 123 from 1985, the worst single-aircraft disaster.
Date: Before mid-2026. Evidence: Most lethal air disaster he hasn't covered yet (besides 9/11, which had external causes, so it is out of scope for him).
That might sound pessimistic, but the sad reality is that the average mobile phone user won't notice until it is too late. The average mobile phone user just wants to get their daily dose of Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, or whatever is popular.
Google will ignore the campaign like they ignored the avalanche of complaints after they took away the option to turn off pull-to-refresh in Chrome, and will get away with it because its users have almost nowhere else to go (Apple was locked down since the beginning) or are too dependent on Google services for their daily lives.
While any smartphone vendor can use Android, Google services like Play Store and Gemini require phone vendors to be "Google Play certified", meaning they have to strictly comply with requirements set out in its certification process. No source links because I am tired of fighting the spam filter. Look it up for yourself if you want to.
The average mobile phone user gets fooled by the avalance of corporate propaganda into accepting beint treated like a toddler on their own smartphone, a property they paid for.
Users have already been conditioned into accepting lots of ownership violations such as locked bootloaders that are difficult or not possible to unlock, screenshot blocking, meaning apps can arbitrarily disable screen capture against the will of the device owner, as well as serialized batteries, text messages that can be falsified after sending, and data lock-in which prevents users from backing up or transferring their user data.
Date: 2026-2027. Evidence: All of the above.
I hereby release this post into the public domain under CC0 1.0.
These were uploaded to YouTube and MSN Video by TheKillerShiny as well, but he deleted his YouTube channel sadly, and MSN video is a rotting corpse (it was shut down long ago).
There were over a hundred mini-movies (123 to be exact, see archived playlist page), the hundredth of which was just a compilation of the 99 before. Thankfully, he uploaded 57 of them to Dailymotion, saving them from becoming lost media.
Because I highly doubt anyone from the English lost media community has it.
It's the video "10 unglaubliche Orte wo keiner/kaum einer war ft. TrollwutTV" by KuchenTV, released on September 22nd, 2016. (German discussion)
Original video ID: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOuDVjYV1GE
Proof of existence: https://archive.today/2016.09.29-164542/https://www.youtube.com/user/KuchenTV/videos
A famous lyric from Jake Paul's song "It's everyday bro" is Nick Crompton's "England is my city".
What he possibly meant:
-
He is so famous in England that everywhere where he would go, he would be recognized as if he were in his home city.
-
He knows England so well as if it were his home city.
Edit in response to comment: I am not implying it is true, but it is what he might have believed.
Bing translation:
Searching for
I want to search for a specific dress. I have a picture of it and I want to get it, but I want to know where I can find it, at least the name of the online store or the physical shop. I want a method I can use to search for a product that will help me reach a 100% accurate result. Is it possible to find a way to use social media to get the same model?
There is a piece of lost media many people in Germany are looking for. Unfortunately, no one in the German lost media community found it so far. Probably whoever out there happens to have it doesn't know it is sought after.
This piece of lost media is a YouTube video that had a medium six-digit view count, from a channel that had almost half a million subscribers at the time it was released, and now has over a million subscribers, so there is a realistic chance someone out there has preserved it.
An idea in the back of my mind was to ask for it through the Internet megaphone: a search engine advertisement.
Someone searching for specific terms would get an advertisement that asks them if they have a copy of said video.
The advertisement could look similar to this:
Do you have a copy of "[video title]" by "[creator]"?
or
We are looking for the video "[video title]" by "[creator]". Please send us a copy if you have it.
Followed by contact details.
Given that this piece of lost media is a YouTube video, I highly doubt Google would allow it to be advertised on their platform because , nor do I trust Google with my real-life identity (which they require advertisers to disclose).
Therefore, I would have to resort to alternatives like Bing and DuckDuckGo. DuckDuckGo loads advertisements from Bing from what I understand.
Do you have experience asking for lost media through search engine ads? Do you recommend it? How do you imagine such an ad would look like?
There is a piece of lost media many people in Germany are looking for. Unfortunately, no one in the German lost media community found it so far. Probably whoever out there happens to have it doesn't know it is sought after.
This piece of lost media is a YouTube video that had a medium six-digit view count, from a channel that had almost half a million subscribers at the time it was released, and now has over a million subscribers, so there is a realistic chance someone out there has preserved it.
An idea in the back of my mind was to ask for it through the Internet megaphone: a search engine advertisement.
Someone searching for specific terms would get an advertisement that asks them if they have a copy of said video.
The advertisement could look similar to this:
Do you have a copy of "[video title]" by "[creator]"?
or
We are looking for the video "[video title]" by "[creator]". Please send us a copy if you have it.
Followed by contact details.
Given that this piece of lost media is a YouTube video, I highly doubt Google would allow it to be advertised on their platform because , nor do I trust Google with my real-life identity (which they require advertisers to disclose).
Therefore, I would have to resort to alternatives like Bing and DuckDuckGo. DuckDuckGo loads advertisements from Bing from what I understand.
Do you have experience asking for lost media through search engine ads? Do you recommend it? How do you imagine such an ad would look like?
From my experience, ntfs3 reads much faster than ntfs-3g (ntfs-3g sometimes is in the single-digit MB/s), and it can show birth times (stat command) thanks to the statx syscall, probably owing to ntfs-3g running as FUSE, not kernel driver.
But sometimes when trying to make changes, ntfs3 gives me a "permission denied" error even with correct uid and gid mount options. ntfs-3g does not have this glitch. If correctly mounted, it just does what I ask it to.
Something about it bothered Linus and he merged ntfs3 into the kernel instead. I can't really remember what is was though.
This got me curious and I asked on linuxquestions.
The two most well-known NTFS drivers on Linux are ntfs-3g (FUSE driver, used for over a decade) and ntfs3 (kernel driver since 2021, replaced read-only ntfs kernel driver).
by on :
I usually always remember to
-t ntfs-3gin my mount parameters. The Tuxera userspace driver is a lot more stable, imho.Something about it bothered Linus and he merged ntfs3 into the kernel instead. I can't really remember what is was though.
This got me curious and I decided to research it a bit, but couldn't find a definitive answer. Does any of you know what bothered Torvalds about ntfs-3g?
Was it something licensing/bureaucracy-related or actually a technical reason?
Just noticed: "extra layer" is manipulative wording that suggests it is just a trivial addition. But it is a fundamental change that annihilates Android's founding principles.
Es freut mich, dass ich dir helfen konnte. Viel Spaß mit dem Video!
Übrigens, kennst du jemanden, der das Video „10 unglaubliche Orte wo keiner/kaum einer war ft. TrollwutTV“ aus 2016 haben könnte?
The first world hasn't really been moving away from privatizing and towards government owned the last couple of decades.
But heavily regulated, the most recent example being the UK online safety act, and DMCA being the most long-term example. Also, EU GDPR imposed an extreme bureaucratic burden upon small websites. We also dodged some bullets such as EU Article 13 in 2019, and SOPA, PIPA, ACTA in 2012 in the USA.
Also, if one nation (China, UK) does something, other nations might get the idea and try to copy it (see KOSA in the USA).
Der Streit zwischen KuchenTV und Shurjoka begann lange nach 2016. KuchenTV hat das Video „10 unglaubliche Orte an denen keiner/kaum einer war ft. TrollwutTV“ etwa 2018 offline genommen (mehr dazu).
und verschiedene Videos mit Trollwut
Das freut mich! Ist darunter „10 unglaubliche Orte an denen keiner/kaum einer war ft. TrollwutTV“? Wir bei /r/LostMediaDE suchen danach.
Er hat viele Videos aus dieser Zeit entfernt. Hat jemand von euch damals Videos von KuchenTV gesichert, insbesondere aus den Miguel Pablo/HeracAy-Zeiten?
Already tried it. No results.
Wayback Machine: Available (metadata only)
It was already privated as of August 2020.
YouTube: Not Available
Nyane.online: Not Available
Odysee: Not Available
Distributed YouTube Archive: Not Available
Filmot: Not Available
PreserveTube: Not Available
GhostArchive: Not Available
Hobune.stream: Not Available
RemovedEDM: Not Available
Archive.org Details: Not Available
Shazam, and by extension anything that relies on it (like Aha-music), can only list one result.
This leads to the problem where Shazam doesn't find the original instrumental track, but other media that used it as background music.
Examples that can be tested include "The Midnight - Collateral" matching "BrookHoliday - Paper Guns" and "Wayne Jones - Mr. Sunny Face" matching the video "Bad Money" by Mark Angel comedy, because it used this as background music.
Does anyone know a sound search engine that matches multiple results?
Shazam, and by extension anything that relies on it (like Aha-music), can only list one result.
This leads to the problem where Shazam doesn't find the original instrumental track, but other media that used it as background music.
Examples that can be tested include "The Midnight - Collateral" matching "BrookHoliday - Paper Guns" and "Wayne Jones - Mr. Sunny Face" matching the video "Bad Money" by Mark Angel comedy, because it used this as background music.
Does anyone know a sound search engine that matches multiple results?
I predict that social media services in most countries and all first-world countries will be government-owned by 2060, like it is in China today.
Date: 2060.
Evidence: See what China did with WeChat ().
Ich habe jetzt mal eine Anfrage auf r/DHExchange eingereicht, in der Hoffnung dass es dort jemand hat: [R] 2016 video by German YouTuber KuchenTV: "10 incredible places where no one/almost no one has been ft. TrollwutTV".
In September 2016, German YouTuber KuchenTV (Tim Heldt) who at that time had over 450K subscribers (now over a million) published a satire video titled "10 unglaubliche Orte wo keiner/kaum einer war ft. TrollwutTV", which translates into "10 incredible places where no one/almost no one has been ft. TrollwutTV". Even though its view count was in the six digits, it is lost media now.
It is listed in . The thumbnail is an auto-generated stock photo used in the video. .
The video ID was QOuDVjYV1GE (). It is indicated as private, not removed for terms of service violations, so it was him who took it down, but likely involuntarily. The most plausible reason he took it down was that he got frightened of getting striked on old videos after his channel and other channels like "OPEN MIND" (discussion about drugs) were temporarily terminated in 2018 (reinstated shortly after), so as a precautionary measure, he took down lots of old videos with edgy humor that could even remotely be considered offensive. ()
For reference, strikes on old videos are what lead to the termination of Mumkey Jones later that year, and Mumkey was not reinstated.
"10 unglaubliche Orte ..." is the first video he published after his video titled "Miguel Pablos Beerdigung" (translated "Miguel Pablos funeral", later retitled to "Bye Bye Miguel Pablo!", a video against Miguel Pablo as the title suggests), one of his most viewed videos ever, and . 2016 was the year where KuchenTV rose to popularity, so I am convinced someone out there has a copy of "10 unglaubliche Orte ..." as well.
More context: Phone manufacturers eventually recognized that there is only so much that can be fit into a single lens, so they have added multiple lenses.
But not all lenses in smartphones are tele lenses. For example, on the Galaxy A series, there is a macro lens and a wide-angle lens in addition to the main lens.
If you choose the highest resolution (50M or 64M depending on model), the camera app won't even let you zoom in (which is good).
If you use the normal resolution (12M or 16M), you will get 2x of lossless zoom, given that a cropped area from the image sensor can be read. But the camera app unfortunately lets you zoom more, in which case the quality will degrade.
Wenn dein Budget es zulässt, lieber SSD.
Bei USB-Sticks und SD-Karten sind in der Regel bei etwa 200 MB/s Lesegeschwindigkeit Feierabend. Schreibgeschwindigkeiten sind niedriger und werden in den Datenblättern häufig nicht mal genannt.
Bei MicroSD-Karten sogar noch weniger. Eine SanDisk Ultra MicroSD mit 80 MB/s Lesegeschwindigkeit schreibt laut meinem Test nur mit 10 bis 15 MB/s. Das reicht jedoch in den Mobilgeräten in denen sie eingesetzt werden in der Regel aus.
SSDs hingegen können um ein vielfaches schneller sein, insbesondere bei zufälligen Schreibzugriffen. Sie halten auch deutlich mehr Schreibzyklen aus, bedeutet sie sind langlebiger.
Genaue Zahlen unterscheiden sich je nach Modell.
At 50M or 64M high resolutions (depending on device), it only lets you select automatic flash. What is the point of this restriction? It seems completely arbitrary and unreasonable.
In comparison, Xiaomi allows manual flash at high resolution, and even continuous light, which Samsung doesn't have at all in photo mode. But to Samsung's credit, they have added the ability to turn the light on and off during (not just before) a video recording, which Xiaomi does not have.
Google Chrome, at least its mobile version, will probably give website operators the ability to prevent their pages from being downloaded and screen captured.
In the recent years, Google "Don't be evil", also known as "Web Environment Integrity company", has made major anti-control and anti-ownership decisions, most notably and excusing it with that, as always, fools most people, so this is not ouside the realm of possibility.
Given that "Don't be evil" controls most of the web browsing market share, they can do some real damage there as well. In 2023, "Don't be evil" hallucinated something up, naming it the "", which would have taken away lots of freedom from end users. But they graciously decided to step down with it. But the same can't be said about SafetyNet / Play Integrity API. And .
"Don't be evil" is also and also lets Android app developers arbitrarily .
Since 2018, "Don't be evil" Chrome on Android , even though there are valid reasons for it like testing and documenting how a website appears to first-time visitors.
If When "Don't be evil" implements a download blocking anti-feature, it will probably be an HTTP header like allow-downloading: false and allow-screen-capture: false, or some euphemistic (good-sounding) name that hides the real meaning, like "flag secure", which they use for . And they will tell the usual "it's to protect everyone's privacy" fairy tale.
Or their marketing department will frame it as "we give website owners more control over what happens with their content" or something like that, similarly to what they did with scrolling ("") after they by taking away the ability to turn it off.
If I can think of it, they must have thought of it long ago. "Don't be evil" executives won't rest easy until they have eroded away the last bit of user freedom. All that is holding them back from adding download blocking at this point is probably that it is easier to switch web browsers than operating systems. Installing an Android alternative like LineageOS requires an unlocked bootloader and significant technical knowledge, whereas installing Firefox or Brave browser is no big deal, at least for now.
The plain and simple reality is, if someone doesn't want their content preserved by others, they should not put it onto a visible spot on the Internet in the first place. It has been this way all the way since the beginning of the Internet.
So if you're a Chrome user, know this: Your ability to store local copies of any page you want is probably on borrowed time. Don't take it for granted.
Date: before 2030. Evidence: more than enough. See above.
I hereby release this post into the public domain, .
The wires are designed to pull a signal off the sensor X times a second, and then be able to cool down. If you’re refreshing that sensor 4x as often it’s going to generate a lot of heat
Thanks for the response, but is it more heat than four times less often but four times as much data? Is there a source for it?
(Not that I think you're wrong, but I would like to find out more about it.)