Mythic Talent released a response to Grimmi, and I feel its vagueness is intentional and leaves questions with it's wording. Mythic claims transparency, yet state they paid her "less our agreed-upon management fee" - confirming a deduction was made, but never disclosing the rate. While there may be reasons for this lack of disclosure, it leaves ambiguity unless either party decides to relay that "agreed-upon" deduction. They also argue her payout "would have been significantly lower" had skimming occurred, but an undisclosed or miscommunicated fee rate would produce that same result. Lastly, the campaigns were "valued at" $2,100 and $4,400 - which is an interesting word choice, that I think implies the campaigns were not *paid* at those amounts. That said, it's worth asking what she was actually told upfront and what the sponsors actually paid. A miscommunication is very plausible to have happened here. Though, I also think it's *possible* that their stated "value" of a campaign doesn't align with what the sponsor actually paid, with of course, a previously agreed-upon deduction for the management fee.