A Better Tomorrow II

A Better Tomorrow II

Sometimes a single scene can make a career; A Better Tomorrow has a scene that made two. Nearly half an hour into John Woo's film, an implacable Chow Yun-Fat, clad in a trenchcoat and equipped with two pistols, performs a dinner-table assassination, then retreats to retrieve a series of guns previously hidden to allow a safe egress. The whole sequence, which alternates swift action with slow-motion details, plays out in less than two minutes. Still, it proved long enough to establish a new breed of Hong Kong action film and a new type of action star, though its director had labored anonymously for years within the Hong Kong studio system and its star had seen his modest early-'80s success erode by mid-decade. A huge hit in Southeast Asia upon its 1986 release, A Better Tomorrow sent hundreds of would-be Chows into the streets to learn firsthand the foolishness of wearing trenchcoats during Hong Kong summers. This development doubtless disturbed Woo, as it revealed how many fans missed the point. It's worth noting that in the key scene, Chow suffers an injury that reduces his character to ruin for the remainder of the film, as the whip of violence snaps back with unexpected suddenness. Contradictory though it may be, for all his fetishization of bloodletting, Woo's work also displays a clear hatred of it, as A Better Tomorrow—only now, alongside its sequel, receiving wide American video release in its original form—ultimately makes clear. As much an examination of the principles of friendship and family as an action film, Tomorrow dusts off an ages-old melodrama plot: the relationship between two brothers, one (Ti Lung) a gangster, the other (Leslie Cheung) a cop. Chow has a supporting role, his character serving as an example of the wages of sin, but he neatly steals the film. In him, Woo found the perfect vehicle for his career-long (not counting last summer's disappointingly undistinctive Mission: Impossible 2) obsession with the contemporary struggle between good and evil, a theme established here in bold, sweeping strokes. As good as Tomorrow is, Chow and Woo would go on to make even better films together. Though not without its virtues, A Better Tomorrow II isn't one of them. The first film's conclusion would seem to prohibit it, but here Chow returns as the never-mentioned twin brother of his character from Tomorrow. He seems a bit squeezed-in, as does some commentary on the first movie's success and a subplot in which Chow nurses a reformed gangster back from insanity. Overall, ABTII (Woo's least favorite of his films) plays like a halfhearted remake of its predecessor. Even so, superlative action scenes, particularly a bloody guns-grenades-and-swords finale with a body count to rival the opening scenes of Saving Private Ryan, help wash away many of the flaws. Action for its own sake may not have been the film's intended point, but it'll do.

 
Join the discussion...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.
C+

Russian propaganda starts young in the slight but moving Mr. Nobody Against Putin

An elementary school teacher fights back against a regime's mandates in this small-scale, secretly shot documentary.

Russian propaganda starts young in the slight but moving Mr. Nobody Against Putin

Released at last year’s Sundance amid a crop of documentaries highlighting the escalating militarization and warmongering of nations around the globe, Mr. Nobody Against Putin highlights the shifting cultural climate that made My Undesirable Friends: Part I—Last Air In Moscow so vital, from a perspective both more quaint and harrowing than that film’s opposition journalists. Writer-director David Borenstein’s film was shot surreptitiously by its subject and co-director, Pavel “Pasha” Talankin, a Russian elementary school teacher, who used his position as the in-house videographer to collect his queasy footage.

In his polluted, rundown smelting town of Karabash, Pasha’s carved out a sweet little life pushing back on the conservative politics that so often accompany a formerly prosperous blue-collar hub. The tween students who use his office as a secluded hangout spot have facial piercings and dyed hair; they play guitar and film music videos for fun in the safety of Pasha’s “pillar of democracy.” Pasha all but turns his chair around and gives his students free reign to talk shit about the government. But when Russia invades Ukraine in February of 2022, a propagandistic educational platform is passed down from Vladimir Putin, and Pasha’s school is slowly infected by a virulent, forced, antagonistic patriotism. Gun-wielding military play-acting, assemblies hosted by the private militia the Wagner Group, and other nationalistic ceremony accompanies xenophobic rhetoric, all caught on tape by the man whose job description now entails recording propaganda for the regime.

Partially because of its shooting method, where Pasha smuggled out two years of footage shot during the course of his school duties, Mr. Nobody Against Putin can feel limited in scope, the gaps around what we see bridged by confessionals he delivers in his apartment. Perhaps exacerbated by Borenstein putting this film together after the fact (well, more after the fact than most movies), the aspiring narrative threads running through the film and papered over by personal monologues can feel forced or half-baked, as if assembled without the actual substance needed to make the point stick. This kind of arc-based manipulation isn’t uncommon among nonfiction, especially when there’s little control over what footage you’re working with, but it’s too transparent here, giving the otherwise intimate film the unflattering air of reality television. 

Yet, when Mr. Nobody Against Putin relies solely on its footage of history in motion, it’s vital. Its observations of a nation’s shifting attitude towards war, towards hate, is crushing and familiar—and it’s made all the more legible when reduced down in scale to this environment of children and lecturers. Most of Pasha’s peers rebel in small ways against the new lessons they are mandated to teach by the Ministry Of Education. Yet, one in particular—a gaunt, old-school, hardliner history teacher (of all things)—embraces it wholeheartedly. Despite his seeming dryness as a pedagogue and relative unpopularity compared to the hip, young, Western-leaning Pasha, the man who leaps to conform wins a competition for “favorite teacher” and is rewarded with a new apartment. It’s a material reflection of a rightward swing driven by quid pro quo, which has become more and more common in the U.S. as our political environment creeps towards that dictated by Putin.

It’s also a reflection of how larger social tides can quickly turn, leaving the principled few in the lurch. The most upsetting moments of the film, aside from watching as his former students are vaguely conscripted into a conflict orchestrated by a dictator, are when his older coworkers advise him to keep his head down and stop being so vocal about his beliefs. Largely abandoned by his community, which rallies around the troops composed of their young men, and fretted over by those close to him, Pasha’s desperation to make a difference becomes all the more painful. In light of his smaller acts of rebellion (knocking over flags, making near-inflammatory statements to classrooms), it’s no wonder that he became so invested in making this film, even if he can never really say all the things he wants out loud. Mr. Nobody Against Putin is a movie born from hopelessness, and yet, because of how relatable that despair has become as our own government has tightened its grip, its minor defiance is both courageous and aspirational to those of us observing the erosion of our values in real time.

Director: David Borenstein
Writer: David Borenstein
Release Date: January 21, 2026

 
Show all 12 comments...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.
C

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man fast-forwards to WWII for a superfluous finale

Introducing elements impossible to contain to its runtime while repeating the show's standbys, the Peaky Blinders movie can't have it all.

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man fast-forwards to WWII for a superfluous finale

At the end of Peaky Blinderssixth season, Birmingham gangster Tommy Shelby (Cillian Murphy) finally found grace. Not to be confused with his late wife and lost love Grace (Annabelle Wallis) from the first three seasons—rather, in the most recent moments of the BBC series, it seemed Tommy had stumbled onto inner peace. He’s about to commit one more murder when he hears the bells tolling to mark the eleventh hour on Armistice Day. “Peace at last,” he says. For a traumatized veteran of the First World War who spiritually died down in the trenches for King and Country, this is the only way he could be compelled to stop chasing vengeance: An appeal for his soul arriving at the literal eleventh hour. It’s a moment that makes Murphy and series creator Steven Knight’s choice to return to the well for Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man, a flashy but ineffective feature-length continuation of the show, into a superfluous swing for finale-style pathos.

Nobody has benefited from Peaky Blinders‘ success quite like Knight, who since its premiere has created no fewer than ten other series and miniseries. Knight now resembles something of a British Taylor Sheridan—after penning some brilliant small-scale screenplays (Eastern Promises, Locke), now churns out new properties that broadly appeal to the same demographic. Knight is a hot commodity, but Peaky Blinders remains his crown jewel, and Netflix has already cut a deal to stream its sequel series. Knowing that some “next generation” reboot of Peaky Blinders is in the works goes a long way to explain why The Immortal Man feels like an obligatory and fatalistic highlight reel of Tommy Shelby’s anger, guilt, and self-hatred.

It’s now 1940, and Tommy is in self-elected exile in a dilapidated country house away from the Birmingham Blitz, haunted by the spirit of his daughter Ruby, who died from illness (or, a “gypsy curse”) in the final season. A visit from Kaulo (Rebecca Ferguson), a spiritual Romani woman, pushes Tommy to further confront the death around him.

Kaulo is the twin sister of Zelda, the mother of Tommy’s first son, who was born before the First World War; in Tommy’s absence, Duke (Barry Keoghan) is tearing through a bombed-out Brum as the brutal new leader of the Peaky Blinders gang. Clearly lacking a decent paternal influence in his life, Duke is easily convinced by Nazi operative John Beckett (Tim Roth) to commit treason. The plan is to smuggle counterfeit banknotes across England, which would eventually destabilize the U.K. economy—all based on a real Nazi plan, Operation Bernhard. “If you were my son, I would cherish you,” Beckett says to Duke, expertly pinpointing where the young gangster’s insecurities lie. Just as Beckett encourages Duke down a path of no return, Tommy is convinced by Kaulo and his younger sister Ada (Sophie Rundle) to reenter the fray before his legacy—and the country—is lost forever.

A WWII-set season of Peaky Blinders involving Operation Bernhard would make for great television; in 112 minutes, there’s no time to enjoy the procedural and espionage pleasures of the premise. How did a band of Nazis infiltrate massive English industrial cities at the height of the Blitz? What was their plan to distribute the counterfeit notes, and how costly would a small outbreak of fake money be in Birmingham? As a principled criminal, what’s Tommy’s stance on hoarding and distributing counterfeit money? With six hours of screentime to play with, Beckett and his operation would be a real threat to a country on the brink, but as The Immortal Man stumbles out of its elongated first act, it’s clear that Knight sees it as the B-story to a rehash of the Tortured Tommy Shelby Greatest Hits. Murphy dutifully but not memorably restages episodes that showcase Tommy’s icy badassery, his easily irritated ego, and his barely concealed trauma.

Tommy is incensed about Duke being a failson (at one moment, Tommy beats Duke into pigmuck to literalize their power dynamic), but The Immortal Man never makes a good case for Duke being a worthy co-lead, and Keoghan struggles to find the right balance between brooding intensity and violent explosions that, in Murphy’s hands, always felt genuine and intimidating across the series. It doesn’t help that The Immortal Man sags in the villain department; Peaky Blinders is no stranger to big-screen talent dropping in as a scenery-chewing villain (Adrien Brody as a mafioso in Season 4 is a sight to behold), but Roth is too gifted at playing sinister men who refuse to drop an affable persona, and Beckett is Roth on autopilot, registering as too cool and casual. Roth glides through his scenes, chummily sublimating the character’s evil into an ordinary, blokish demeanor—either we needed four more hours in Beckett’s company to understand his unique flavor of Nazi bile, or director Tom Harper needed to better utilize Roth’s limited screentime by making him more memorably nasty.

Harper directed half of the show’s first season, and once again given a Netflix production budget after helming Heart Of Stone, he tries to inject the story with more style—carefully composed eerie images, a flashier edit, more severe and swooping low angles. It’s more, but not necessarily better. The film is shot with too many close-ups which, when combined with the quick pacing, only exaggerates how insistently The Immortal Man tries to ground us in the story. The location work and set design are notably excellent—foggy moors are juxtaposed with dirty, snow-covered canals in Birmingham’s industrial corners, and gorgeously cracked walls and dilapidated houses, all partially reclaimed by a dying world that undermines our characters’ sense of purpose.

But all of this comes back to a central story problem. Even reimagining Operation Bernhard as a season-long arc would still require Peaky Blinders to bring Tommy and his unsolvable emotional problems back into the fray, potentially wasting more of the audience’s time as Knight tries to stumble towards a justification for trotting out more flat caps, more weary Cilliam Murphy haunted by waking shadows, and more Nick Cave needledrops. The Immortal Man is not a good entry point into Peaky Blinders for the same reason it is not rewarding for existing fans: It traffics only in the late stages of Shelby’s arc, but offers nothing new to those who have already been there, done that.

Director: Tom Harper
Writer: Steven Knight
Starring: Cillian Murphy, Sophie Rundle, Ned Dennehy, Packy Lee, Ian Peck, Stephen Graham, Rebecca Ferguson, Tim Roth, Jay Lycurgo, Barry Keoghan.
Release Date: March 6, 2026; March 20, 2026 (Netflix)

 
Show all 35 comments...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.
B+

The Bride! is a bold, bloody, feminist Frankenstein freakout

Maggie Gyllenhaal and Jessie Buckley mean to make you uncomfortable in their confrontational monster movie.

The Bride! is a bold, bloody, feminist Frankenstein freakout

The premise of The Bride! is hidden from its advertising. Writer-director Maggie Gyllenhaal opens on Mary Shelley (an acidic Jessie Buckley) stuck in a black-and-white purgatory of sorts, only her face visible. She’s lit sporadically by slow-pulsing lights, which reveal a wry smile matching the sneer in her voice. She informs viewers about the unintentionally tame nature of her original book, the grotesque version of Frankenstein she dreamt up, and the desires behind the sequel we’re about to watch. The Bride!—”A ghost story, a horror story, or, most frighteningly, a love story,” as Shelley describes it—is the Frankenstein she wanted to write but didn’t get to.

Now in the afterlife, Shelley reawakens. She feels something cracking inside her (“A sequel is coming. Everything will change,” she warns), something she can crack in someone else, a woman named Ida (also Buckley), who finds a great deal of dissatisfaction in the small amount of dignity she’s allowed as a woman in 1936 Chicago. Thus, Shelley finds a way to kill Ida and reanimate her from the grave, infusing her new muse “Penny” with a brilliant, vile, vigorous, take-no-prisoners attitude that Frankenstein never had.

On the contrary, Frankenstein’s Monster, or Frank (Christian Bale) for short, is just the opposite: He’s a gentle, tender-loving man obsessed with Golden Age Hollywood musicals and suffocated by the loneliness he’s endured for 117 years as a monster walking the Earth, who looks much more horrific than Guillermo del Toro’s steely blue Elordi rendition. Frank is also part of this world’s lore; everyone in The Bride! and their mother is so familiar with the story of Frankenstein that they find his sudden appearance confusing to say the least, if not falsified. 

Frank tracks down Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) with the hopes of commissioning her to resurrect a partner for him, for companionship more than carnal pleasures. She chides him (“We’ll find you a plucky redhead with big titties!”) before she begrudgingly agrees, and The Bride is born in a photo-negative flash of flourish. She’s unaware of who she was or what she is now, but she’s no less fiery for it. Frank and Euphronius lie to her, telling her she’s Frank’s fiancé. She spouts, shouts, and jerks around feverishly, possessed by the restless spirit of Shelley, quoting writers and literary texts like a tenured professor, iterating on words and ideas uncontrollably. She communes with the dead, speaking to Shelley in dreams, and quotes Scottish theologian John Knox with her motto: “Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.”

Gyllenhaal assembles a superstar crew for her sophomore feature, and the tact and imagination of the veterans at work makes the bold, boundless vision of The Bride! possible. The team includes longtime Paul Thomas Anderson editor Dylan Tichenor, Oscar-winning composer Hildur Guðnadóttir, Martin Scorsese costume designer Sandy Powell, Baz Luhrmann production designer Karen Murphy, and lead producers known for late-era Scorsese and Israeli firebrand Nadav Lapid. Per the Lapid producers—whom Gyllenhaal connected with while leading a 2018 English-language remake of The Kindergarten Teacher, a movie too difficult to stomach for many—there is no doubt that The Bride! understands its own divisive nature. Some will find its crass approach and overt feminist messaging garish, even if they agree with it. At its worst, The Bride! can indeed be heavy-handed. But its indelicate vulgarities and in-your-face politicking are all part of its construction, meant to push viewers’ buttons. (Gyllenhaal dedicates the film to her daughters, and, in that sense, one can see the instructive storybook qualities in its DNA).

The wild violence and audacious artistry in Gyllenhaal’s comedy-romance-horror —a sharp left turn away from the subtle observation that grounded 2021’s The Lost Daughter—is on shocking display from the moment we meet The Bride as Ida, who’s killed by mob henchmen she dares say “no” to. They slap and punch her around, eventually whacking her down a staircase. In slow motion, she snaps her neck and leg as a black-and-white portal appears, hovering around her with afterlife ambience, signaling Shelley’s god-like hand at work. Later, in her first move as The Bride, she takes excitedly to a freaky dancefloor, only to be groped and grabbed into a fury (for the first, but not the last, time), sparking the murders that send Frank and Penny on the run.

They flee from Chicago to New York City to Niagara Falls, pursued by a pair of sly detectives (Peter Sarsgaard and Penélope Cruz) who have their own misogynistic narrative at play. Along the way, Frank and Penny follow the settings of Frank’s favorite Ronnie Reed films. He adores Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, delightful under his sister’s guiding hand)—a fictional Fred Astaire who sings Irving Berlin songs and tap-dances gleefully—just like Penny adores confrontation, be it constructive with Frank (“Wanna fuck?”) or destructive with a stranger forcing his hand under a woman’s skirt in a movie theater. Together, the monsters run amok. They kill thugs and cops, spark a new wave of eccentric reanimated dancing at a swanky party, and draw the attention of the media, the authorities, and the public. It isn’t long before the disobedient geometry of Penny has ignited a Joker-like revolution of “murderous dolls” made up of silenced women. They wear black wedding veils and ink-blot makeup on one side of their mouths, like The Bride, and take the abusive men in their lives captive.

Gyllenhaal never tones down the brutality, ripping us through bloody tongues, heads, and bodies—in cinematographer Lawrence Sher’s fit of gorgeously captured violence—until the frenzied finish. Likewise, Shelley sticks around until the bitter end, cackling her way through the story she puppeteers. As another English novelist once wrote, “The dead don’t die. They look on and help.”

Director: Maggie Gyllenhaal
Writer: Maggie Gyllenhaal
Starring: Jessie Buckley, Christian Bale, Peter Sarsgaard, Annette Bening, Jake Gyllenhaal, Penélope Cruz.
Release Date: March 6, 2026

 
Show all 135 comments...