r/conspiracy

IRANs invasion.

Commentators are speculating that the US have rushed into a conflict without having adequately ensured munitions supply lines that will support the effort for any length of time beyond two weeks.

Supreme leader Trump brags of the great army and weapons at hand.

WHAT IF:

The US have some form of directed energy weapons that they are preparing to deploy for the first time at scale?

Otherwise the war effort seems logistically cooked from the outset.

Call it a gut feel, intuition, an estimated guess or naivety.

I believe without a shadow of a doubt that Iran is soon to be wiped entirely of the map by US based nukes.

Soon they are going to find 'undeniable' proof that Iran has weapons of mass destruction and 'intercept' an attack by said... 'nukes'.

The US will retaliate quickly and without mercy...

The world will never be the same, the world will be divided and what will be the biggest mass murder on the planet... will be only the start of the suffering.

We will know it was fake and they will not care.

Epstein files were a test to see if we would react and stand up to the injustice and we have failed already.

When I say US... we all know who I am really talking about.

...to any god that is listening, I pray that I am wrong.

The CIA has released millions of declassified documents. MKULTRA. Operation Mockingbird. Church Committee. MK-NAOMI, Epstein. All of it technically public. Nobody reads it because it's completely inaccessible - buried in PDFs, scattered across agencies, impossible to cross-reference without a research team and years of time.

I'm building Enkime to fix that.

What makes it different from anything that exists: the AI doesn't interpret. It doesn't tell you what to think or summarize what things mean. It finds exact passages from real documents matching your search and shows you which documents connect through the same names, dates, and programs. You decide what it means. Every time.

No OpenAI. No corporate API that can be pressured to censor results. Self-hosted open source AI on servers in press-freedom jurisdictions. Nobody can call us and make a document disappear.

This doesn't work without the community. The power grows with every document added, every FOIA request filed, every connection spotted across files. Early members shape what gets built and what gets prioritized. This isn't a startup with investors. It's infrastructure for collective truth-finding and independent journalism.

Demo coming very soon. Early access list is open.

Ask me anything.

I believe you all have been mentally hijacked

Nothing making any sense anymore

I just want to wake up. Non of this is real

Are they really wanting to sacrifice us ? Like a lamb to the slaughter. ?

What the fuck bro? Seriously are they trying to bomb us? Are they trying to nuke us? Is this all just a one big ritual to summon the demons they call aliens dude please? No

This war against Iran was planned long time ago. Venezuela makes perfect sense now, it is a backup plan for resources in case things go really bad with Iran. Trump wanted Greenland for the same reason but got blocked by Europe. Iran's nuclear bomb program is nothing but a psyop that most people accept it without question. France wants to drag Russia into this conflict by spreading their nuclear weapons all over east Europe. One mistake and we are all fucked.

I don't understand how people think that everything is going to cool off after Israel and the US is finished with Iran.

Do they not understand that Israel won't stop until it has full dominance over the reigon?

Once they are finished with Iran, they will go after Turkey, Pakistan and Egypt. As they mentioned, from the Nile to the Euphrates the land belongs to them. Israel is not a nation, rather a satanic entity that wants global power.

And they commit their atrocities to accelerate their arrival of the antichrist, who they believe will pave the way for them, the Jews, and lead them to glory. That is the only reason as to why they're dragging the world down with them.

They claim to be God's chosen people yet they live everyday like as if its their last day. They chase this world and not the afterlife. They worship money and power like no other. They fear death because they know what awaits for them.

A "country" that has to attack its neighbouring countries, bomb schools and hospitals killing women and children in order to exist has absolutely no right to exist.

Or what can we do? I’m here on the bus on my way to work and I feel very complicit

Change my mind? Thoughts....

Look, I want to be told why I’m wrong in thinking this, but I also don’t want a platitude simply stating that multiple number systems are valid. We’re defining right to mean probably useful and probably coherent over generations of time. It doesn’t have to be useful right now. Define right to mean potentially useful in the future, even if the far future, somehow.

In the real world, everything has units, so 1x1=1 unit times 1 unit equals 1 unit squared. Now, I understand our number system of integers and real numbers just treats units like they don’t exist, but if we wanted more allegiance to units existing in the real world, we would acknowledge multiplication of 2 quantities increasing the value by increasing dimension. Now, we should want to remain in a system that is dimensionally equal and the units are just implicitly there. We don’t want a multi—dimensional number system basically because we’re trying to improve the 1 dimensional system. So if we acknowledge that multiplication always increases in the real world because increasing dimension is always an increase vaguely speaking, but we certainly need to sacrifice dimensionality, we could at least encode the increase somehow. We can make it better than 1x1=1 where the information that multiplication was even involved in the left hand-side is lost on the right hand side.

Upon thinking a bit, here’s a way that might make sense:

1x1=(1+ epsilon) x (1+ epsilon) = 1+ 2e +e^2 (e=epsilon)

We simply set every integer n to n + e for an actual value of (epsilon: e equals not integer, e>0) that we choose to be fitting in each case.

This makes enough sense because exactly 1.000… doesn’t really occur in the real world anyways.

Using the epsilon also retains the information of multiplying since the e^2 terms in the algebraic expansion always shows up in the number.

It’s almost like the dimensionality of multiplication shows up in the precision of the e^2 terms, even though we remain 1 dimensional.

Now the sense in which this validates Terrence Howard is we choose our value of epsilon. If we set epsilon to epsilon: e=(sqrt(2)-1),

then 1x1=(1+ epsilon) x (1+ epsilon)=

(1 + sqrt(2) - 1) x (1 + sqrt(2) - 1) =

sqrt(2) x sqrt(2)

= 2

Understand, I’m not saying we set epsilon to sqrt(2)-1 always. I’m saying we set it to something new each time we do a set of mathematics. Epsilon is always greater than 0 and so this is in tune with Terrence Howard saying 1x1 should be greater than 1.

Also, we should note that setting epsilon so that the second smallest number, (2), is an integer, is probably a useful thing to do. This is simply in the sense that if you can retain a product as an integer, retaining the number 2 as exactly 2.000…allows you to retain successive double (which is just simpler than successive tripling for example).

The consensus had become that Terrence Howard is utterly insane and nonsensical, so I thought I should verbalize my curiosity when I caught an inkling of coherence to something he said.

Isn’t this somewhat reasonably related to floating point arithmetic and numerical analysis?

Anyways, feel free to tell me why none of this is even as much as interesting.

If you start with the set of integers, epsilon should be transcendental. This is obvious I hope. Just like the whole point is adding a number that requires a greater cardinality set to create separation of terms while remaining in 1-dimension. I hope that’s just intuitive and doesn’t need to be spelled out.

So technically epsilon could not be sqrt(2)-1. I technically mean a transcendental number that’s really close to sqrt2)-1. I just didn’t want to make it too complicated so I said that as shorthand.

Anyways, you would add epsilon to every single number in your set. So I guess we’re starting with the set of integers, so you would add epsilon to every integer. You can start with the set of rationals or algebraic irrationals or whatever because they all have the same cardinality. (If you wanted to start with the set of real numbers, epsilon would need to belong to the set of surreal numbers and not belong to the set of real numbers. You can totally do this—it’s not hard—I’m just avoiding it for simplicity’s sake)

Now: the reason having epsilon be around sqrt(2)-1 is a good choice is because it produces the number 2.0000… which is basically an integer. In this case…it’s arbitrarily close to an integer. We want 1 integer to be in there. We want 1 remnant from the set that was input before we shifted everything up by epsilon.

I guess you could set epsilon so that (1+e)*(1+e)=3, but why, that would just make it more complicated. There’s no reason to do that.

Setting epsilon to be around sqrt(2)-1 gives you the best of both world. You still have integers because once you have the integer 2, you can get all even integers with addition. Oh yeah this also makes it clear why setting epsilon so that 2 is an integer makes the most sense. We can only have one integer and so 2 is the best choice because we get all multiples of 2. All multiple of 3,4,5…n would be fewer integers. Anyways you have the best of both worlds because you maintain all even integers, and information is preserved upon multiplication.

Edit 1: I fixed the lack of paragraphs. I apologize. I was very upset when writing this post and post structure wasn't at the forefront of my mind.

Edit 2: I am not a part of any political party. The comments that are insulting specific parties are so weird in my opinion. The Epstein files involve far more than just a single political party and is a global issue at this point. I have children and I am concerned about the future they will inherit.

My partner and I have been delving into the Epstein Files since their most recent release and needless to say I'm disgusted, enraged, and want to take action because my desire for justice is raging at this point. My partner is more passionate about it than I am.

We recently got into a discussion with some family members and they essentially told us that nothing can be done, nothing's going to change, and we're nuts for believing that people could organize and do something about this. They even went so far as to label the files as propaganda.

I have never been much of a conspiracy theorist but my partner has been one for 15+ years. I know that conspiracy theorists have been called crazy for decades but this is my first experience with it. It seems like things are so obvious though!

We're both feeling defeated at this point because we came to the conclusion that there are quite a few family members that will end up on the opposing side if it comes to a revolution or civil war in the US. My heart is broken over this. I'm not really looking for advice. I just needed to get this off my chest.

This is the major problem with all the violence going on. In 1913, the Federal Reserve was created. What happened after? A non ending series of wars funded by this new leverage tool that used the US as its collateral, effectively turning us citizens into slaves. We are the oil that keeps the war machine going. Most of us do it without being aware, getting into petty fights about race and other meaningless things.

The Federal Reserve is the #1 issue and I'm surprised how few people actually know this. Get rid of it, everything we have a problem with goes away. It has always been about money.

I've noticed it for a while now but this sub's response to the Epstein files was pretty alarming. I don't claim to know everything but I've definitely been on this sub for almost a decade now, and it feels like the quality went so far downhill. It's like it became mainstream and the quality plummeted. I'm not trying to be confrontational but this sub just feels so weird anymore. I love conspiracies and I'll never leave, but it's hard to not notice

Where are we right now. I have read both of these books over the last 4 months and it’s like taking a brick to the face. We are living these novels. Or this is how I feel living in the US.

Where to go from here? Buy some land? Learn how to farm? Do we even worry about saving money for “retirement”, college, etc.?

If you can't see that, I have no sympathy for you.

In 2026, it’s okay to be anti-Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Korean, Russian, French, Italian, Irish, German, English, American, Mexican, Canadian, Indian, African, Sudanese, Afghani, Iranian, Vietnamese, Venezuelan, Peruvian, Australian, Brazilian, etc….

It’s NOT OKAY to be anti-Israeli!!!

Iranian protesters burned an effigy labeled “Baal,” shown with a Star of David and Israel’s flag, while chanting “Death to Israel.”

Baal is an ancient Canaanite deity often used today as a symbol of Satanism or elite corruption (for example Epstein).

Many have wondered how the 'money loaners' have enslaved us. The following demonstrates just one example of how members of “The Cousin-hood” have economically enslaved the people.

Brothers-in-laws Nathan Rothschild and Moses Montefiore concocted a plan to perceive to eliminate slavery while enslaving the British with compensation to …... Not the slaves ….. But the slave owners. In 1837 Rothschild and Montefiore provided a load on 20 million pounds to the Bank Of England for use as compensation for slave owners. Five million pounds of the payment were taken out in Bank Of England shares.

Rothschild and Montefiore were Queen Victorias stockbroker and financial advisor. These two men controlled an 18 year old girl in 1837 and beyond. Montefiore and Rothschild were both slave owners, so they provided the loan to the Bank Of England, were compensated with their own loan and also obtained shares in the BoE in the process. What a business deal!

The Slavery Abolition Act 1833 was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which abolished slavery in the British Empire by way of compensated emancipation. The act was legislated by Whig Prime Minister Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey's reforming administration, and it was enacted by ordering the British government to purchase the freedom of all slaves in the British Empire, and by outlawing the further practice of slavery in the British Empire. The Act explicitly delineated 19 separate pots of compensation covering the Caribbean, South Africa, and Mauritius. Although Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were technically included, these had relatively few slaves at this time for other reasons. India was excluded. Around 800,000 freed slaves were attested in the claims process.

On 20 June 1837, William IV died at the age of 71, and Victoria became Queen of the United Kingdom at the age of 18 and 1 month.

In the first year as Queen, Victoria approved the slave compensation act 1937

The Slave Compensation Act 1837 was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, signed into law on 23 December 1837.

It authorized the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt to compensate slave owners in the British colonies in the amount of approximately £20 million for the freeing of slaves. Based on a government census of 1 August 1834, more than 40,000 awards to slave owners were issued. Since some of the payments were converted into 3.5% government annuities, they lasted until 2015. Most were sold and the money sent abroad for investment.

British historian Nicholas Draper, in his book The Price of Emancipation: Slave-Ownership, Compensation and British Society at the End of Slavery, states that "Nathan Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore led a syndicate underwriting the issue of three new series of securities to raise £15 million: we don’t know how much they distributed or sub-underwrote. A further £5 million was paid out directly in government stock". Both slave owners themselves.

"The Montefiore family had strong familial and business ties with the Rothschilds, one of the wealthiest banking families in Europe. Jacob and Joseph’s cousin, Sir Moses Montefiore (1784-1885), was the brother-in-law of Nathan Mayer Rothschild, and became wealthy as his stockbroker. As mortgagee, Rothschild claimed £2,571 17s 9d compensation for an estate in Antigua (158 enslaved people) in 1839.

The largest total amount paid in compensation was to Sir John Gladstone, 1st Baronet, father of prime minister William Gladstone, who was paid £106,769 in compensation for 2,508 enslaved men, women and children they regarded as property across nine plantations.

Since 2018, numerous Freedom of Information Act requests have been sent to the British government and Bank of England for the names of those who were paid with the bonds, of which all were denied.