User talk:Schlooshy

Thanks for your contributions to Evil Morty. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Schlooshy (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have added some more sources, could you please review it? Schlooshy (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rick and Morty Wiki is not an acceptable source on Wikipedia. Also, the screenrant source is just a top ten list. That won't work either. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:34, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, alright. I'll give it some time and try and find some better sources. I submitted a review earlier, is there a way I could withdraw that whilst I find some better sources? Schlooshy (talk) 17:37, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone the submission for you. Look at sourcing used on the articles for Rick and Morty to guide you. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for your help. Schlooshy (talk) 17:39, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Schlooshy!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:34, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Schlooshy (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frukt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frukt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_♥^✿ TheMDC4 chat :3 ^✿_♥ 07:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ian Cardoni, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. see WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 09:29, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. Schlooshy (talk) 09:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People Playground is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People Playground until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mosplot (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page People Playground, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]