Original ArticleArticles in PressFebruary 02, 2026

Improving Diagnostic Precision in Thyroid Pathology by Synergistic Use of AI and Molecular Markers

Affiliations & Notes
1Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
2Summer Undergraduate Research Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
3Division of Surgical Oncology, College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
4Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
5Department of Endocrinology, Mercy Hospital, Springfield, Missouri
Co-senior and co-corresponding authors who contributed equally.
Article Info
Publication History:
Received October 17, 2025; Revised January 19, 2026; Accepted January 28, 2026; Published online February 2, 2026
Footnotes:
Sources of Support: None.
Copyright: © 2026 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Linked Articles

Abstract

Objectives

For indeterminate thyroid nodules, molecular tests offer high negative predictive value (NPV), reducing missed malignancies, but have limited positive predictive value (PPV), potentially leading to unnecessary surgeries. We evaluated how integrating artificial intelligence-based imaging (AIBx V2) with ThyroSeq v3 could enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 108 indeterminate thyroid nodules. Surgical pathology was available for 42 nodules for primary analysis; the remaining 66, without surgical pathology, were deemed benign for analytic purposes and included in the total cohort for secondary analysis reflecting real-world practice. We calculated test performance for AIBx V2 alone, ThyroSeq v3 alone, and a combined approach (AIBx V2+Mol). In the combined approach, when ThyroSeq v3 reported “Malignant”, but the estimated malignancy probability was intermediate or lower, the final classification deferred to AIBx V2.

Results

In the surgical pathology subset (n = 42), ThyroSeq v3 demonstrated high sensitivity (0.95) but moderate specificity (0.45), leading to a PPV of 0.65. AIBx V2 improved specificity (0.60) but had lower sensitivity (0.77). The AIBx V2+Mol approach retained high sensitivity (0.95) while raising specificity to 0.60, improving PPV to 0.72 and AUC from 0.70 to 0.77. In the entire cohort (n = 108), AIBx V2+Mol maintained excellent sensitivity (0.95) and further enhanced specificity, 0.90 vs0.87, PPV 0.72 vs0.65, and AUC 0.93 vs0.91.

Conclusions

Integrating AIBx V2 imaging model with ThyroSeq v3 preserved the high sensitivity of molecular testing while improving specificity and PPV. These exploratory results need validation in larger studies before the combined model is incorporated into clinical practice.

Key words

  1. thyroid nodules
  2. artificial intelligence
  3. molecular testing
  4. thyroid cytology
  5. machine learning

Abbreviations

  1. ACR (American College of Radiology)
  2. AI (artificial intelligence)
  3. AUC (area under the curve)
  4. DL (deep learning)
  5. FNA (fine needle aspiration)
  6. IRB (Institutional Review Board)
  7. NPV (negative predictive value)
  8. PPV (positive predictive value)
  9. ROC (receiver operating characteristic)

Get full text access

Log in, subscribe or purchase for full access.

References

1.
Huang, Y. ∙ Chan, S.J. ∙ Wright, J.D. ...
Does the adoption of molecular testing cause decreased thyroidectomy rates in a national cohort? A quasiexperimental study of High- versus low-adoption states
Thyroid. 2024; 34(3):388-398
2.
Cibas, E.S. ∙ Ali, S.Z.
The 2017 bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology
Thyroid. 2017; 27(11):1341-1346
3.
Livhits, M.J. ∙ Zhu, C.Y. ∙ Kuo, E.J. ...
Effectiveness of molecular testing techniques for diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA Oncol. 2021; 7(1):70-77
4.
Kim, N.E. ∙ Raghunathan, R.S. ∙ Hughes, E.G. ...
Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules managed nonoperatively after molecular testing with Afirma GSC or Thyroseq v3
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 108(9):e698-e703
5.
Nikiforova, M.N. ∙ Mercurio, S. ∙ Wald, A.I. ...
Analytical performance of the ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier for cancer diagnosis in thyroid nodules
Cancer. 2018; 124(8):1682-1690
6.
Jug, R. ∙ Foo, W.C. ∙ Jones, C. ...
High-risk and intermediate-high-risk results from the ThyroSeq v2 and v3 thyroid genomic classifier are associated with neoplasia: independent performance assessment at an academic institution
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020; 128(8):563-569
7.
Dharampal, N. ∙ Smith, K. ∙ Harvey, A. ...
Cost-effectiveness analysis of molecular testing for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 51(1):46
8.
Tessler, F.N. ∙ Thomas, J.
Artificial intelligence for evaluation of thyroid nodules: a primer
Thyroid. 2022; 33(2):150-158
9.
Thomas, J. ∙ Haertling, T.
AIBx, artificial intelligence model to risk stratify thyroid nodules
Thyroid. 2020; 30(6):878-884
10.
Nair, G. ∙ Vedula, A. ∙ Johnson, E.T. ...
Combining image similarity and predictive artificial intelligence models to decrease subjectivity in thyroid nodule diagnosis and improve malignancy prediction
Endocr Pract. 2024; 30(11):1031-1037
11.
Tessler, F.N. ∙ Middleton, W.D. ∙ Grant, E.G. ...
ACR Thyroid Imaging, reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14(5):587-595
12.
van Rossum, G.
Python library reference
CWI, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1995
13.
DiGennaro, C. ∙ Vahdatzad, V. ∙ Jalali, M.S. ...
Assessing bias and limitations of clinical validation studies of molecular diagnostic tests for indeterminate thyroid nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis
Thyroid. 2022; 32(10):1144-1157
14.
Buda, M. ∙ Wildman-Tobriner, B. ∙ Hoang, J.K. ...
Management of thyroid nodules seen on US images: deep learning may match performance of radiologists
Radiology. 2019; 292(3):695-701
15.
Athreya, S. ∙ Melehy, A. ∙ Suthahar, S.S.A. ...
Combining ultrasound imaging and molecular testing in a multimodal deep learning model for risk stratification of indeterminate thyroid nodules
Thyroid. 2025; 35(5):590-594
16.
Ahmadi, S. ∙ Kotwal, A. ∙ Bikas, A. ...
Outcomes of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules managed with genomic sequencing classifier
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 109(12):e2231-e2239

Article metrics