Проблемы с просмотром страницы? Перейди на нашу страницу диагностики, чтобы разобраться, в чем дело.
Перейти к содержимому
Rhys Archer

Inclusive Citizen Science in practice: Learning across borders

Inclusive Citizen Science in practice: Learning across borders

Inclusive Citizen Science in practice: Learning across borders

Inclusive Citizen Science

Feel free to add your thoughts and/or questions throughout the session! We would also love to hear about your own work in this area

Rhys Archer: аватар

What do you think of this graphic? Does it illustrate diversity and inclusion?

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

🙂

CK: аватар
CK

Lovely, but I think it could be better. The hedgehog helps by becoming a look-out for the boat, but with this solution the oar is missing to move the boat forward. So it might give the impression that including the hedgehog will slow things down. It's true that worrying about inclusion can slow things down, but we need a better way to present the advantages versus the disadvantages.

The hedgehog can comfortably sit on pandas head (crow's nest) and do as CK suggests. It's a workaround, as with pretty much anything when beings all team up, regardless.

Sarah West: аватар
Sarah West

Need some adjustments now, like an extra oar!

Marit: аватар
Marit

Yes, within the limits and means that the animals have available (a rubber, easily destructable, boat). However, it would be more inclusive of them to have build or bought a wooden boat in the first place

Аватар анонима
Анонимный

They need to change the boat

Sarah West: аватар
Sarah West

Yes - much more inclusive boat needed - could have been bigger too to accommodate more than 2 beings

Michael: аватар
Michael

In part, but so much diversity isn't seen/visible

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

Wait, so is everyone okay with the fact that hedgehogs are prickly? ;)

CK: аватар
CK

Being prickly is not a flaw :-) It's just a physical characteristic that's not very compatible with a rubber boat!

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

I get the point :) But surely not everyone coming on board has to be 'prickly' by definition, right? ;)

Alisa: аватар
Alisa

They didn't choose to be born prickly though?

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

Of course! It's really more a matter of our own perception.

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

Well, I feel like I need to expand on this. It's about how we tend to perceive personality differences as a liability. It's the 'prickly hedgehog' analogy - something that feels like a threat to the team and the mission. But with the right framework in place, those exact traits can become a serious asset. E.g., a friend of mine ran a small software company years ago (pre-AI coding boom). He operated remotely and hired almost people on the autism spectrum. They handled high-level, complex work incredibly well. He didn't do it just as a 'feel-good' charity project; he genuinely recognized that neurodivergent folks have unique strengths. His job was just to facilitate the workflow and manage the communication. Far from being a liability, those 'non-hedgehogs' were the reason his business scaled, and they all grew together.

Smriti Safaya: аватар
Smriti Safaya

What does inclusion in citizen science mean to you?

Michael: аватар
Michael

Anyone is able to participate - reality can make this expensive, especially if it's fieldwork

Sarah West: аватар
Sarah West

As Alisa said, designing for inclusion (e.g. neuroinclusion) makes citizen science more accessible for many groups!

Smriti Safaya: аватар
Smriti Safaya

Challenges you face with doing inclusive citizen science & if and how you've tried to address them?

There are an abundance of projects these days. One of the biggest challenges is being thrown in at the deep end without a gentle lead in and introduction. It can be a blast of excessive and overwhelming stimulus. I generally address it by moving onto the next one, but hopefully that can be addressed by some of the aims of what we are attempting to achieve.

Michael: аватар
Michael

Using the BTO as an example - variety of surveys from home/park through complex field studies. Youth group gaining strength in recent years Projects | BTO

Smriti Safaya: аватар
Smriti Safaya

Questions?

Alisa: аватар
Alisa

To Becca: What could be the reasons for disengaging with nature during the high school years and later? Could it be lack of time / resources rather than lack of want / need? Or it is something else?

Michael: аватар
Michael

@Alisa - just one of many reasons from time mentoring teenagers in inner city London. 'I can't do science', because it involves maths'! The same group that kept giving this answer don't generally do computer studies because 'Excel is maths'

Alisa: аватар
Alisa

@Michael - thank you!

Smriti Safaya: аватар
Smriti Safaya

Thoughts & Comments

Smriti Safaya: аватар
Smriti Safaya

Some definitions shared at a webinar last week about inclusivity and equity in citizen science by Dr. Claire Murray (definitions are from the Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design): Inclusion is involvement and empowerment, where the inherent worth and dignity of all people are recognized. 

An inclusive system promotes and sustains a sense of belonging. It values and practices respect for the talents, beliefs, backgrounds, and ways of living of its members. An inclusive system also recognizes that agreement might not always be the end result, but that dialogue and understanding are part of the larger process that allows for inclusivity to be achieved.

Equity is the equal distribution of a system’s benefits and burdens regardless of its members’ differences. 

In other words, equity would be a reality in which an individual or groups are no more or less likely to experience a system’s benefits or burdens just because of their differences, creating an environment where everyone can succeed and thrive. In our not yet perfect world, a commitment to equity requires the will and action of a system to redistribute opportunities and power.

Andrey CRB Gorokhov: аватар
Andrey CRB Gorokhov

I think it's difficult to realistically discuss justice and equality in this world. It's even harder to entrust these issues to specific individuals. However, it is entirely possible to design a system whose very architecture regulates the parameters of inclusion for each and every one of us. There are plenty of examples of this, this current project included. If you build the right incentive structures from the ground up, 'onboarding' into that ecosystem happens almost automatically.