Undersight: Wikipedia Leaks Database

[Bbb23sucks]

Hello, I have finally launched the long awaited Wikipedia leaks site! I'm really sorry for the delays and lack of updates, but please know I have put a ton of effort into this and have been working on it near constantly for past three to four months. I'm especially sorry to badmachine for not giving you updates after your donation. I will try to make this up later though and post a technical write-up.

The site is here: https://undersight.wpsucks.xyz

Here's some stats:
* Over 155 million deleted revisions are available across all wikis
* 120573, or 42.6% of all, oversighted revisions are available on just English Wikipedia alone.
* This is just the beta version, in a month or two, I will release an update which, among many other things, will have a significant increase in data.

There's a ticket system available for processing takedown reports. If you would like to help with, e-mail me.

[Bbb23sucks]

Site's only been up for a few minutes and I've already discovered something completely insane. So insane that I've had to redact it

Not only did Wikipedia's article state support for child pornography in 2003, but they linked over half a dozen CSAM sites.

I've redacted it all of course.

And it wasn't even vandalism - active editors put it and kept adding more links and it stayed for a long time.

Example link (all CP links have been redacted of course): https://undersight.wpsucks.xyz/wiki/enwiki/rev/1557730

[Bbb23sucks]

Also see the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Inte ... ornography

[Strelnikov]

Site's only been up for a few minutes and I've already discovered something completely insane. So insane that I've had to redact it

Not only did Wikipedia's article state support for child pornography in 2003, but they linked over half a dozen CSAM sites.

I've redacted it all of course.

And it wasn't even vandalism - active editors put it and kept adding more links and it stayed for a long time.

Example link (all CP links have been redacted of course): https://undersight.wpsucks.xyz/wiki/enwiki/rev/1557730

Yes, it was a huge issue with Wikipedia in the early years; they had known members of the "Boylove" community and insane monsters like Beta M hanging around (by the way, my blogpost that was just a copypaste of the discussion thread on Beta M's activities was considered so shocking by Blogspot that you have to press a special button just to see it, they are trying to hide it from the queasy or the underaged, and also because the laws in Europe have changed since I originally posted it.) If you dig deeper you may find more examples, and overlaps with the Star Trek fandom or Libertarians/Objectivists (Ayn Rand fans), those communities have been known to have nonces among them.

[Bbb23sucks]

Ooooh, I found something spicy: http://undersight.wpsucks.xyz/wiki/enwiki/rev/809459313 links to https://web.archive.org/web/20171109055 ... Bolick_Dox

[Archer]

Over 155 million deleted revisions are available across all wikis

Considering how many documents there are, I'd start with text clustering and other exploratory techniques to get a bird's eye view.

[Ognistysztorm]

Ooooh, I found something spicy: http://undersight.wpsucks.xyz/wiki/enwiki/rev/809459313 links to https://web.archive.org/web/20171109055 ... Bolick_Dox

He is reportedly one of the most toxic editors on Wikipedia.