The Jewish Question - The thread
52 replies·745 views
17 hours ago(edited 16 hours ago)
The jewish Question, explained.
"This is the way the jew make money.. and made a fortune in the past ten years" selling short the shipping futures" let the goyim deal in the real world"
- Jeffrey Edward Epstein
I have noticed a surge of "noticers", or rather JQ'rs on social media and right wing spaces. This mainly happened due to the internet, 4chan, israel's invasion of Gaza, Agartha edits, Hitler's speeches being translated to English through AI, accompanied by the rise of Nick Fuentes following Charlie Kirk's death, unofficially "replacing" him. But unfortunately the new wave of JQ'rs do not have a good grasp on the jewish question. They just have a weak idea of what jews control or what kind of control they have on the world. They don't know how they get into power, what causes them to become the way they are etc... I am currently dissatisfied with groypers and new wave of JQ'rs, especially with their non-serious behavior and grasp on jewish influence.
A quick backround summary
The origin of jewish exploitation comes from Rome. God used the Romans as vessel for His Wrath to kill the 1.5 million jews in Judea. Their homeland was eventually destroyed on 70 AD causing them disperse all over the Eurasian area. Because Europeans banned usury by Christian law, only jews were left to partake in such activities. This gave them a monopoly on loaning money at excessive interest rates. Imagine you are a nobleman low on cash, and you need that quick loan for building that castle, to assist that war against another nobleman, only a jew would offer you a loan because he has those high interest rates. Before you know it you are enslaved to debt, and have to sell your assets to him to support yourself, that's an oversimplification. This gave jews so much power in finance, economy and politics, they effectively ruled some parts of Europe. It was European desperate greed and jewish malice that fed their influence in Europe. Eventually when kings and nobles could not handle the debt or get in too much trouble, they would kick the jews out their lands or massacre them. Jews have always been an outside group everywhere they went, and never assimilated. This made them a special group that acted mostly against to others, as they developed a high in-group preference and out-group hostility. Most banking families have been jewish and still are.
Jews have been key in controlling the world's affairs through lobbying, donation, funding, manipulation, destruction, mass murder, replacement, blackmail, etc… This status quo has been a major liability for the advancement of Western civilization. For 2000 or maybe even 3000 years they have infiltrated, subverted, manipulated and controlled markets, governments, key people, nations, peasants and kings.
<reddit spacing
One notable fact that illustrates this kike control is that 40% of all billionaires are jewish, despite being less than 0.2% of the population. This gives an over representation of 200x~. It's undeniable that jews indeed play a role in this and those who will say otherwise are foolish. I have witnessed many progressives and leftists confronted with this fact, say that it was European oppression that led them to this, thus it wasn't the jews fault. But they will ignore they still oppress and exploit the common man. They will say 60% are still unwholesome chungus oppressors, but not recognizing that the jews control the access to their capital through banks, and a group of billionaires who are jewish will cause them to form an in-group that is specifically for jewish billionaires. They don't understand jewish identity that fuels their hostility and exploitation. They value education, business and success more than any other group, even more than East Asians. The jewish problem is that they do not assimilate in the culture, have a high in-group preference, are never satisfied with wealth, are nepotistic, call others goyim, and have an unique position in society that no other group has. Essentially, they are parasites that manipulate, infiltrate and destroy everything they come across. This jewish billionaire class identity, fuels the exploitation of the common man as it dehumanizes the gentile. it is not class, not race, it's both.
Conclusion
The jew is never satisfied, they always want more. Their greed (and malice) exceeds no other collective group. They're scum of the earth. The only way to fix the "class" problem is either to answer the jewish question. You have to prevent these people from becoming a self-conscious collective that will eventually influence you. Surprising that jews have been doing that exactly to Whites by degrading their culture, weakening their identity and race consciousness.
Some videos that explain this in detail:
How Central Banking Ruined The World: https://youtu.be/XJrkutSC6ww
A history of Central Banking And The Enslavement of Mankind: https://youtu.be/jhyLRDcAfoo
Books:
Culture of Critique Series:
1. https://archive.org/details/kevinmacdonaldapeoplethatshalldwellalone_202002
Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism
2. https://wesselarchive.org/en/book/208
The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements
3. https://archive.org/details/the-culture-of-critique-kevin-mac-donald-1998
Henry Ford, the International Jew
https://ia802901.us.archive.org/2/items/HenryFordTheInternationalJew/Henry_Ford_The_International_Jew.pdf
A history of Central Banking And The Enslavement of Mankind
https://archive.org/details/a-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-o-240417-064104
2 hours ago(edited 2 hours ago)
If I didn't take it seriously I wouldn't make this thread. Now I know you're baiting and you're as right wing as me, just like @Slvt4BIBISI, but I'm thankful you brought up these points. Now nusois, imagine an actual leftist thinks this way, an unexperienced cuckservative would immediately fall victim, and kneel to the moralistic finger wagging of "but it heccin hurts pipo when you don't bring in infinite browns". Also, for the record I do not deny the holocoaster and agree it was actually 72 billion and they were all brutally killed by masturbation machines and exploded into pieces. Besides, I did mention a cause and effect, not just pointing out correlation.It's like you don't even take your identity seriously. Honestly, I prefer it that way. It means you won't go to greater lengths to defend a worldview that even you implicitly admit is bunkum.↗unverifiedGood one, this made my day
The reason nationalism is needed, is because shared cultural and identity strengthens unity between people. It is inevitable that racial consciousness of two groups that are too distinct from each other, makes them incompatible. Say if you have a land of Whites, and another land of Blacks. I'm not saying one is superior to the other, but we can all agree they are different or else we wouldn't make that distinction. On an individual level, it barely matters, there are plenty of Whites who are friends with blacks.
Collectives
We are talking about scales of hundreds of thousands of people AT LEAST. We are talking about collectives. Different collectives have different interests due to different cultures, which determine what one finds important in life, basically determining what life is for them. Various things that are influenced by culture:
Now let's say you bring in a group of people that are distinct from the host group. They will form in-group preferences, not because someone told them so, but because they are different. For sake of argument, let's say 5% of these people are malicious compared to the natives, of whom 1.5% are malicious.
Imagine you bring in 3 people in a land of 10000, no biggie. Now let's say it's 1000. Now you have a problem, they will form a community that has little to nothing in common with the host group and function with an in-group preference, oh and they commit crime. They will put their race and own folk above everyone else, and thus disadvantage the native inhabitants. Look at Indians in sillicon valley, or just Indian immigrants in general. These Indians infiltrate businesses and then use their nepotism to fill it with other Indians, similar how jews and the Chinese operate.
This is how triads, mafias and gangs formed in the first place. All racial gangs. Even the Irish did this on a large scale before assimilating in the Anglo culture of America.
Look at the Netherlands, how did heroin and drugs come in and wreck Amsterdam? It was through the triads, who networked between other Chinese to sell drugs. Even now it's a problem, but with Morroccans. Multiculturalism opens pathways for foreigners to come in and take advantage of the openness of the people.
Race Realism - Exquofonte: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc8DWmOX5Ac
Indian Fatigue - FlightFormSyracuse: https://rumble.com/v6yr0a4-indian-fatigue.html
Nationalism, pride and importance in identity is key to protecting a country from foreign influences. Else, people wouldn't care because they have no connection to the land they live on. Keeping a country homogenous prevents this. Multiculturalism is stupid and prevents unionizing and people from rising up.
These pictures attached also explain it very well.
1 hour ago(edited 1 hour ago)
Let's refute these arguments, one by one.↗unverifiedIf I didn't take it seriously I wouldn't make this thread. Now I know you're baiting and you're as right wing as me, just like @Slvt4BIBISI, but I'm thankful you brought up these points. Now nusois, imagine an actual leftist thinks this way, an unexperienced cuckservative would immediately fall victim, and kneel to the moralistic finger wagging of "but it heccin hurts pipo when you don't bring in infinite browns". Also, for the record I do not deny the holocoaster and agree it was actually 72 billion and they were all brutally killed by masturbation machines and exploded into pieces.It's like you don't even take your identity seriously. Honestly, I prefer it that way. It means you won't go to greater lengths to defend a worldview that even you implicitly admit is bunkum.↗unverifiedGood one, this made my day
The reason nationalism is needed, is because shared cultural and identity strengthens unity between people. It is inevitable that racial consciousness of two groups that are too distinct from each other, makes them incompatible. Say if you have a land of Whites, and another land of Blacks. I'm not saying one is superior to the other, but we can all agree they are different or else we wouldn't make that distinction. On an individual level, it barely matters, there are plenty of Whites who are friends with blacks.
Collectives
We are talking about scales of hundreds of thousands of people AT LEAST. We are talking about collectives. Different collectives have different interests due to different cultures, which determine what one finds important in life, basically determining what life is for them. Various things that are influenced by culture:
Now let's say you bring in a group of people that are distinct from the host group. They will form in-group preferences, not because someone told them so, but because they are different. For sake of argument, let's say 5% of these people are malicious compared to the natives, of whom 1.5% are malicious.
Imagine you bring in 3 people in a land of 10000, no biggie. Now let's say it's 1000. Now you have a problem, they will form a community that has little to nothing in common with the host group and function with an in-group preference, oh and they commit crime. They will put their race and own folk above everyone else, and thus disadvantage the native inhabitants. Look at Indians in sillicon valley, or just Indian immigrants in general. These Indians infiltrate businesses and then use their nepotism to fill it with other Indians, similar how jews and the Chinese operate.
This is how triads, mafias and gangs formed in the first place. All racial gangs. Even the Irish did this on a large scale before assimilating in the Anglo culture of America.
Look at the Netherlands, how did heroin and drugs come in and wreck Amsterdam? It was through the triads, who networked between other Chinese to sell drugs. Even now it's a problem, but with Morroccans. Multiculturalism opens pathways for foreigners to come in and take advantage of the openness of the people.
Race Realism - Exquofonte: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc8DWmOX5Ac
Indian Fatigue - FlightFormSyracuse: https://rumble.com/v6yr0a4-indian-fatigue.html
These pictures attached also explain it very well.
Of course you cry "moralism!" even tho what white supremacists do is blatant violation of basic human rights. But most white nationalists don't believe in objective ethics and have an inconsistent social darwinian viewpoint. You won't even attempt to attack the holocaust because you know you'd get fucked on it. Glad we agree on that at least.
No, stop. Stop right there. Culture might be important to some people, but most people actually prefer their loved ones (regardless of race) to their "race". Loved ones, unlike race, aren't arbitrary. Race is a social phenomenon and human construct, loved ones are objective. Even these "collectives" are just stereotyping at work. Most people let go of their culture or "race" rather easily. Perhaps there will be some (not necessarily) conflict between them at first, but most integrate into the collective over generations.
Now, about your talk about "collectives". They need to be broken down ASAP. I don't care if it's black or white, asian or hispanic, group mentality is a sign of low IQ and animalistic behaviour. This is only because they cause crime. If they didn't cause crime, then they wouldn't be a problem at all. Nepotism should also be eliminated if it actually hinders progress. Luckily most people don't behave like this, and the Indians you speak of might just be really good managers.
I don't care if they favour their group, as long as it doesn't become nepotism or selective crime I'm fine with it.
The guy "exquofonte" you linked to also has a video called "Identity is better than Morality" which shows how anti-Kantian he is. Fuck that guy, nigger doesn't even get his shit peer reviewed.
Those 2 images also aren't peer reviewed, they might have some sources in them but it's too blurry for me to see anything.
Anyways, here's some actual science on the multiculturalism issue.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176716303212?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056819023015270
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103116306552
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/1/20
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-024-09979-z
Anyways I thought of touching upon IQ but Race-IQ relations are so debunked it's not even funny.
So I know you might think of me as being like you behind the scenes, but Im genuinely not. My entire country has been weakened because of rampant nationalism, and that nationalism might come back to weaken it even more. I have personal reasons for hating nationalism because I have seen the actual evidence of what nationalism does.
In conclusion: Nationalism is based on an arbitrary distinction of "race". It stereotypes people and segregates them so it effectively breeds hate (for no good reason). All arguments for it boil down to "well it's not my people so me mad!" which shows that it's all emotional (perhaps arguments against it also are but most people wouldn't want nationalism if it wasn't for its supposed utilitarian "benefits")
1 hour ago
SAGE olgol posts
37 minutes ago
@Olgol
This is really funny
>Of course you cry "moralism!" even tho what white supremacists do is blatant violation of basic human rights. But most white nationalists don't believe in objective ethics and have an inconsistent social darwinian viewpoint.
Is enforcing a border a violation of human rights? No.
You're just saying "Huh, most of you don't do this, also uhh its heccin darwinian!"
>You won't even attempt to attack the holocaust
I don't care about the holocaust.
>Culture might be important to some people, but most people actually prefer their loved ones (regardless of race) to their "race". Loved ones, unlike race, aren't arbitrary.
If that were true culture wouldn't exist.
>Most people let go of their culture or "race" rather easily.
same thing for above, this is delusional.
>Race is a social phenomenon and human construct, loved ones are objective.
family is also a social construct, is there anything wrong with a social construct? Morality is a social construct too. In fact race is biological and a social, that's why it matters! It's the reason why race exists in the first place.
>Perhaps there will be some (not necessarily) conflict between them at first, but most integrate into the collective over generations.
This only happens with immigrants who are of the same race. Such as the Irish, Poles and Italians. This is not the case for blacks. In fact, 2nd generation immigrants commit more crime than 1st generation immigrants.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07418825.2012.659200
>Now, about your talk about "collectives". They need to be broken down ASAP. I don't care if it's black or white, asian or hispanic, group mentality is a sign of low IQ and animalistic behaviour.
You will never do this because these races exist in the first place, and people are able to be aware of that fact.
>. If they didn't cause crime, then they wouldn't be a problem at all. Nepotism should also be eliminated if it actually hinders progress. Luckily most people don't behave like this, and the Indians you speak of might just be really good managers.
They actually perform worse
>Nepotism should also be eliminated if it actually hinders progress. Luckily most people don't behave like this, and the Indians you speak of might just be really good managers.
You say most people care about their family yet deny existence of nepotism, okay.
>Those 2 images also aren't peer reviewed, they might have some sources in them but it's too blurry for me to see anything.Anyways, here's some actual science on the multiculturalism issue.
selective thinking, they're called thumbnails and are actually quite high resolution. Hope that helps xister.
>Anyways I thought of touching upon IQ but Race-IQ relations are so debunked it's not even funny.
didn't debunk shit award
>So I know you might think of me as being like you behind the scenes, but Im genuinely not. My entire country has been weakened because of rampant nationalism, and that nationalism might come back to weaken it even more. I have personal reasons for hating nationalism because I have seen the actual evidence of what nationalism does.
Nations don't exist without nationalism, so might as well not care about your country.
>In conclusion: Nationalism is based on an arbitrary distinction of "race". It stereotypes people and segregates them so it effectively breeds hate (for no good reason). All arguments for it boil down to "well it's not my people so me mad!" which shows that it's all emotional (perhaps arguments against it also are but most people wouldn't want nationalism if it wasn't for its supposed utilitarian "benefits")
It's actually a good reason, which I explained, you're purposefully ignoring me. Your argument is "Well that makes u a big meanie and its not fair and race just doesnt exist or something"
>The guy "exquofonte" you linked to also has a video called "Identity is better than Morality" which shows how anti-Kantian he is. Fuck that guy, nigger doesn't even get his shit peer reviewed.
I do not care.
This is really funny
>Of course you cry "moralism!" even tho what white supremacists do is blatant violation of basic human rights. But most white nationalists don't believe in objective ethics and have an inconsistent social darwinian viewpoint.
Is enforcing a border a violation of human rights? No.
You're just saying "Huh, most of you don't do this, also uhh its heccin darwinian!"
>You won't even attempt to attack the holocaust
I don't care about the holocaust.
>Culture might be important to some people, but most people actually prefer their loved ones (regardless of race) to their "race". Loved ones, unlike race, aren't arbitrary.
If that were true culture wouldn't exist.
>Most people let go of their culture or "race" rather easily.
same thing for above, this is delusional.
>Race is a social phenomenon and human construct, loved ones are objective.
family is also a social construct, is there anything wrong with a social construct? Morality is a social construct too. In fact race is biological and a social, that's why it matters! It's the reason why race exists in the first place.
>Perhaps there will be some (not necessarily) conflict between them at first, but most integrate into the collective over generations.
This only happens with immigrants who are of the same race. Such as the Irish, Poles and Italians. This is not the case for blacks. In fact, 2nd generation immigrants commit more crime than 1st generation immigrants.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07418825.2012.659200
>Now, about your talk about "collectives". They need to be broken down ASAP. I don't care if it's black or white, asian or hispanic, group mentality is a sign of low IQ and animalistic behaviour.
You will never do this because these races exist in the first place, and people are able to be aware of that fact.
>. If they didn't cause crime, then they wouldn't be a problem at all. Nepotism should also be eliminated if it actually hinders progress. Luckily most people don't behave like this, and the Indians you speak of might just be really good managers.
They actually perform worse
>Nepotism should also be eliminated if it actually hinders progress. Luckily most people don't behave like this, and the Indians you speak of might just be really good managers.
You say most people care about their family yet deny existence of nepotism, okay.
>Those 2 images also aren't peer reviewed, they might have some sources in them but it's too blurry for me to see anything.Anyways, here's some actual science on the multiculturalism issue.
selective thinking, they're called thumbnails and are actually quite high resolution. Hope that helps xister.
>Anyways I thought of touching upon IQ but Race-IQ relations are so debunked it's not even funny.
didn't debunk shit award
>So I know you might think of me as being like you behind the scenes, but Im genuinely not. My entire country has been weakened because of rampant nationalism, and that nationalism might come back to weaken it even more. I have personal reasons for hating nationalism because I have seen the actual evidence of what nationalism does.
Nations don't exist without nationalism, so might as well not care about your country.
>In conclusion: Nationalism is based on an arbitrary distinction of "race". It stereotypes people and segregates them so it effectively breeds hate (for no good reason). All arguments for it boil down to "well it's not my people so me mad!" which shows that it's all emotional (perhaps arguments against it also are but most people wouldn't want nationalism if it wasn't for its supposed utilitarian "benefits")
It's actually a good reason, which I explained, you're purposefully ignoring me. Your argument is "Well that makes u a big meanie and its not fair and race just doesnt exist or something"
>The guy "exquofonte" you linked to also has a video called "Identity is better than Morality" which shows how anti-Kantian he is. Fuck that guy, nigger doesn't even get his shit peer reviewed.
I do not care.
35 minutes ago
conclusion: ur a fag and wrong too
20 minutes ago
not reading but sorry that happened or happy for you
8 minutes ago
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]Is enforcing a border a violation of human rights? No.[/color][/size][/font]
Not what I was implying dumbass. You know that damn well.
>You're just saying "Huh, most of you don't do this, also uhh its heccin darwinian!"
Yes because people like you don't have principles and would commit atrocities if it meant achieving an end. Keep this in mind, it'll come in handy.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]If that were true culture wouldn't exist.[/color][/size][/font]
How so? Most people would rather disobey social norms than give up on their loved ones. Doesn't mean that nobody obeys social norms.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]same thing for above, this is delusional.[/color][/size][/font]
Because you're a nationalist crank who actually thinks people put nebulous concepts like "nation" or "race" above their loved ones.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(45, 79, 134)][url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc8DWmOX5Ac]family is also a social construct, is there anything wrong with a social construct? Morality is a social construct too. In fact race is biological and a social, that's why it matters! It's the reason why race exists in the first place.[/url][/color][/size][/font]
No, nothing wrong with it, just that some matter more than others to people. As a Kantian race is much more different than morality, like there's a qualitative difference between them. OP of that video doesn't even believe in universal morality geg.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]This only happens with immigrants who are of the same race. Such as the Irish, Poles and Italians. This is not the case for blacks. In fact, 2nd generation immigrants commit more crime than 1st generation immigrants.[/color][/size][/font]
Arbitrary distinction, they could be different races. Race is a silly construct anyways like how can't you see this already? The consensus is clear Also the study you mentioned says this
<[font="Open Sans", sans-serif][size=17.6px][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]Results suggest that the myth remains; trajectory analyses reveal that immigrants are no more crime-prone than the native-born. Foreign-born individuals exhibit remarkably low levels of involvement in crime across their life course. Moreover, it appears that by the second generation, immigrants have simply caught up to their native-born counterparts in respect to their offending. Implications of the findings for theory and future research are discussed.[/color][/size][/font]
It is the abstract tho (only that is available) so I could be wrong but it seems the authors don't agree with you
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]You will never do this because these races exist in the first place, and people are able to be aware of that fact.[/color][/size][/font]
Pseudoscientific assertion GEG. This is just sad.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]didn't debunk shit award[/color][/size][/font]
Going to the gym rn so I won't be available but I could show you how wrong you are even on this topic.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]Nations don't exist without nationalism, so might as well not care about your country.[/color][/size][/font]
I care more about my people than I do about my nation, so I guess you're right. Countries could still exist but their definition would be extremely deflated.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]It's actually a good reason, which I explained, you're purposefully ignoring me. Your argument is "Well that makes u a big meanie and its not fair and race just doesnt exist or something"[/color][/size][/font]
I've refuted the thing you claim exists. Sorry.
Btw your references are just compilations of other people (who are as deluded as you are) cherry picking studies and quotes. Zero peer review. Good you're so dumb it's hilarious.
Not what I was implying dumbass. You know that damn well.
>You're just saying "Huh, most of you don't do this, also uhh its heccin darwinian!"
Yes because people like you don't have principles and would commit atrocities if it meant achieving an end. Keep this in mind, it'll come in handy.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]If that were true culture wouldn't exist.[/color][/size][/font]
How so? Most people would rather disobey social norms than give up on their loved ones. Doesn't mean that nobody obeys social norms.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]same thing for above, this is delusional.[/color][/size][/font]
Because you're a nationalist crank who actually thinks people put nebulous concepts like "nation" or "race" above their loved ones.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(45, 79, 134)][url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc8DWmOX5Ac]family is also a social construct, is there anything wrong with a social construct? Morality is a social construct too. In fact race is biological and a social, that's why it matters! It's the reason why race exists in the first place.[/url][/color][/size][/font]
No, nothing wrong with it, just that some matter more than others to people. As a Kantian race is much more different than morality, like there's a qualitative difference between them. OP of that video doesn't even believe in universal morality geg.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]This only happens with immigrants who are of the same race. Such as the Irish, Poles and Italians. This is not the case for blacks. In fact, 2nd generation immigrants commit more crime than 1st generation immigrants.[/color][/size][/font]
Arbitrary distinction, they could be different races. Race is a silly construct anyways like how can't you see this already? The consensus is clear Also the study you mentioned says this
<[font="Open Sans", sans-serif][size=17.6px][color=rgb(51, 51, 51)]Results suggest that the myth remains; trajectory analyses reveal that immigrants are no more crime-prone than the native-born. Foreign-born individuals exhibit remarkably low levels of involvement in crime across their life course. Moreover, it appears that by the second generation, immigrants have simply caught up to their native-born counterparts in respect to their offending. Implications of the findings for theory and future research are discussed.[/color][/size][/font]
It is the abstract tho (only that is available) so I could be wrong but it seems the authors don't agree with you
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]You will never do this because these races exist in the first place, and people are able to be aware of that fact.[/color][/size][/font]
Pseudoscientific assertion GEG. This is just sad.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]didn't debunk shit award[/color][/size][/font]
Going to the gym rn so I won't be available but I could show you how wrong you are even on this topic.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]Nations don't exist without nationalism, so might as well not care about your country.[/color][/size][/font]
I care more about my people than I do about my nation, so I guess you're right. Countries could still exist but their definition would be extremely deflated.
>[font=system-ui, -apple-system, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, "Noto Sans", sans-serif][size=medium][color=rgb(61, 64, 82)]It's actually a good reason, which I explained, you're purposefully ignoring me. Your argument is "Well that makes u a big meanie and its not fair and race just doesnt exist or something"[/color][/size][/font]
I've refuted the thing you claim exists. Sorry.
Btw your references are just compilations of other people (who are as deluded as you are) cherry picking studies and quotes. Zero peer review. Good you're so dumb it's hilarious.
8 minutes ago
Fuck this new format
8 minutes ago
DNR Above
Log in to reply to this thread.
