This is the 150th anniversary of Rilke’s birth.
Or, you might say, the 99th anniversary of his death.
I asked a small group of students if they knew of Rilke, the poet, if they had read Rilke. They did not. Had not. They were seventeen, eighteen years old. One immediately addressed his phone. Assessed that the subject was considered “eccentric” and “mystical,” had failed at military school and been kicked out of trade school, travelled a lot, lived in castles, and did nothing but write poems. Most impressive it seemed was how long ago the poet had died, for the student exclaimed with some astonishment that “he was dead before anything had even happened.”
This is no way to begin, I suppose, it is so unnerving, but it does seem to speak, scream, even, of the exclusivity of the present to the young, its dominance over the past, even the future for which it harbors annihilation.
If Rilke returned as an angel, a Rilkean angel, of course, he would be unperturbed by the student’s remark. He perceived angels in a somewhat Islamic fashion, though he was also impressed by El Greco’s Byzantine figurations. The angels of Christianity were definitely not the beings who inspired him. Rilke’s angels were indifferent, perfect, possessed of sovereign remoteness, and, like all angels, male. (At the same time, he explained carefully, they are creatures “in whom the transformation of the visible into the invisible, which we accomplish, appears already consummated.”) They neither comfort nor guide. It is easier to accept Death’s cold clasp than to be embraced by an angel. Angels are the pure timelessness of time. Event means nothing to them. Nor to Rilke.