Tan Wei Sien? Isn't this the tiktok guy? The same fella who filmed himself haranguing foreign workers for sleeping at the void deck and got ratioed for it?
Tan did not tender any written mitigation plea, although he submitted a document containing an "incoherent diatribe against several political leaders in Singapore, with no relevance at all to the present case", Judge Koo said.
Ok now I really want to read it. Is it written in EDMW style?
Tan did not tender any written mitigation plea, although he submitted a document containing an "incoherent diatribe against several political leaders in Singapore, with no relevance at all to the present case"
Bold strategy, too bad it didn't work out too well.
The prosecution sought five to seven months' jail, asking for a slight raise because Tan's conduct at trial showed a lack of remorse in his repeated victim-blaming and in making baseless allegations.
Tan did not tender any written mitigation plea, although he submitted a document containing an "incoherent diatribe against several political leaders in Singapore, with no relevance at all to the present case", Judge Koo said.
Throughout the entire trial, Tan also filed many documents generated by artificial intelligence, which "did not assist the court at all", the judge added.
He found Tan guilty, calling him a "shameless voyeur who had unlawfully infringed upon the dignity and privacy of a 16-year-old student in a public toilet in an egregious and persistent manner".
Even when confronted with overwhelming evidence, Tan "unreasonably and cowardly denied his wrongdoing, displaying an utter lack of remorse and introspection throughout," Judge Koo added.
Tan has filed a notice of appeal against his conviction and his sentence. He is out on bail pending appeal.
When I see someone acting irresponsibly by throwing food onto the ground, I feel angry about their behaviour, because they seem not to care about the cleaners who must clean up their mess.
Bro ate, then decided to masturbate, BOTH in a toilet cubicle
The lack of third spaces hitting hard
It was the student who ate and masturbate. Not sure the thought process though...
According to the article, perp started gooning as soon as he saw the victim gooning.
How can he have the appetite to eat in a toilet sia 🤮
The contrast enhances the taste
There’s a reason why “ate” is in “masturbate” /s
And that was the victim
Tan Wei Sien? Isn't this the tiktok guy? The same fella who filmed himself haranguing foreign workers for sleeping at the void deck and got ratioed for it?
Yep same guy. He made a post complaining about police allegedly deleting video evidence and malay kid leaving food waste in toilet on the same day.
Victim:
Eat -> Wank -> Make police report -> Leave
no.
everything about this is just... no.
I don’t know what I’m reading 😅 everything is so ridiculous
Send this man to horny jail
Bruh this guy shows up occasionally on my Tiktok FYP, he’s a little bit cuckoo if you’ve ever seen his account.
Causeway Point is a mall in yishun? is cna just offshoring and/or ai-ing everything now??
LOL, might as well label the north of SG as Yishun now
Nothing exciting in the north except yishun. No one would believe if it had happened at woodlands
What the hell did i just read
Honestly more embarrassed for the student here
Gathering evidence and leaving his own evidence. The ebb and flow of life.
Absolute cinema
Ok now I really want to read it. Is it written in EDMW style?
I used to eat in the bathroom when I was alone and sad and anxious tbh
Idk anything about the jacking off tho
The amount of twists and turns in this news article is truly film worthy.
This case has so many wtf moments lol...
This is an amazing story.
name sounds familiar
Just say who is gonna clean up when the student makes a mess la...
Bold strategy, too bad it didn't work out too well.
The prosecution sought five to seven months' jail, asking for a slight raise because Tan's conduct at trial showed a lack of remorse in his repeated victim-blaming and in making baseless allegations.
Tan did not tender any written mitigation plea, although he submitted a document containing an "incoherent diatribe against several political leaders in Singapore, with no relevance at all to the present case", Judge Koo said.
Throughout the entire trial, Tan also filed many documents generated by artificial intelligence, which "did not assist the court at all", the judge added.
He found Tan guilty, calling him a "shameless voyeur who had unlawfully infringed upon the dignity and privacy of a 16-year-old student in a public toilet in an egregious and persistent manner".
Even when confronted with overwhelming evidence, Tan "unreasonably and cowardly denied his wrongdoing, displaying an utter lack of remorse and introspection throughout," Judge Koo added.
Tan has filed a notice of appeal against his conviction and his sentence. He is out on bail pending appeal.
His name says it all, Wei Sien can be pronounced as 危险, meaning, danger in Chinese.
Dude is just a clean freak