Hollywood will have to find a new face to direct Face/Off 2

Godzilla Vs. Kong director Adam Wingard has reportedly departed the planned sequel to John Woo's 1997 ham-fest.

Hollywood will have to find a new face to direct Face/Off 2

We’re going to go out on a limb here and suggest that John Woo’s original Face/Off said most of what any reasonable action movie could be expected to say about the technology of Off/Facing, with John Travolta and Nicolas Cage each making respectable contributions to the Ham Sciences in the process. Nevertheless, Paramount has been trying, for fully seven years at this point, to try to get a bit more blood from that particular head-swapping stone, announcing plans for a sequel way back in 2019. Now, though, that in-development planning has hit another snag, with news that announced director Adam Wingard has departed the proposed Face/Off 2.

Per THR, it sounds like Wingard actually quietly vacated the project last year, which means that other directors have been pitching the studio on possible follow-up ideas in the meantime. (Wingard had reportedly written his own script for the movie with Simon Barrett; he was calling the resulting screenplay “really fucking awesome” and “a true sequel to Face/Off” as recently as 2024.) THR reports that Wingard’s break with Paramount on the sequel was apparently mutual. (The The Guest director has mostly been in kaiju mode for the last few years, directing Godzilla Vs. Kong and its 2024 sequel, although his next film is the relatively more grounded Adria Arjona action-thriller Onslaught.)

If we’re being honest, it definitely feels like Paramount is floating in “Sequel just because we own the name” territory, here. On the one hand, there’s nothing to say you couldn’t make another decently fun movie about a cop and criminal swapping faces and living each other’s lives in a world that also has, like, crazy magnet-boot prisons and the like; it’s just that the things that are genuinely appealing about Face/Off have way less to do with the premise, and far more with Woo’s direction and the performances—especially from Cage, who was having a blast letting his more unhinged side out on a big-budget action flick. Even if one of the directors pitching the studio now comes up with a truly great idea, they’ll still have to overcome a problem that seems fundamentally unmanageable, to us: Finding a young actor whose performance can stand up to Cage at his most full-tilt.

 
Show all 42 comments...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.

Former Sony boss still very sorry he let Seth Rogen piss off North Korea

Former Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton's new book explains how terrible things can become when no one can say no to Seth Rogen.

Former Sony boss still very sorry he let Seth Rogen piss off North Korea

It can be a little hard to remember, twelve years later, but there’s really never been anything in Hollywood quite like the 2014 Sony hack: A deliberate and targeted campaign exposing every single skeleton lurking in the closet of a major film producer, (allegedly) organized by a hacker group working at the behest of a foreign government. Personal information, embarrassing private emails, a whole fresh James Bond movie script: The information released in the hack was massive, and insanely damaging, to the point that Sony Pictures Entertainment is still recovering from it more than a decade later. And it was all, allegedly, caused by certain film executives’ inability to tell that dastardly charmer Seth Rogen “No.”

That, at least, is the narrative being put forward (per Variety) in new book excerpts from the tone-obvious-from-title From Mistakes To Meaning, a new book by then-Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton. Lynton, at least, is convinced that the hack was provoked entirely by his studio’s decision to make Rogen and James Franco’s The Interview, a film that probably would have gone down in history as a pretty minor offering in both men’s filmographies if not for the massive international incident of it all. Among other things, Lynton notes that, several months after the fact, Barack Obama himself asked him “What were you thinking when you made killing the leader of a hostile foreign nation a plot point?” Which, Lynton concedes, was a pretty good point.

Somewhat hilariously, Lynton essentially says he was peer-pressured into greenlighting the movie, in which Rogen and Franco play journalists who are recruited to assassinate North Korea’s Kim Jong Un. “Just for a moment,” Lynton writes, “I wanted to join the badass gang that made subversive movies. For a moment, I wanted to hang—as an equal—with the actors. I had grown tired of playing the responsible adult, of watching the party from the outside while I played Risk….The party got out of hand, and the company, its employees, my family and I all paid dearly.” (Truly, a cautionary tale about the dangers of being cool.)

The thing is, in Lynton’s telling, that no one who has not been subject to his affable stoner potency can truly understand how powerful Seth Rogen apparently is. (On the basis of This Is The End making $127 million at the box office the previous year, we guess?) Lynton writes that Rogen successfully played on a rivalry between his own co-chair Amy Pascal (who would wind up resigning over leaked emails in the Sony hack) and Universal’s Stacey Snider, writing that, “When either Stacey or Amy refused to greenlight a film because it was too offensive, the other agreed to make it… Sony found itself in the difficult position of not being able to say no, and Rogen found himself in the enviable position of getting approval for almost anything that he chose to present.” Thus are studio heads brought down and international tensions brought to a head, apparently: Truly, it is Seth Rogen’s world, and we (including the heads of major motion picture studios) are simply living in it.

 
Show all 34 comments...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.

Ted Sarandos "disappointed" by James Cameron over anti-Netflix letter

"I don’t know where it came from or why he would be part of that machine," Sarandos said, of Cameron's very vocal opposition to Netflix buying Warner Bros.

Ted Sarandos

Look, we don’t know what Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos is mad about, when it comes to director James Cameron’s recent letter about the streamer’s dreams of buying Warner Bros. Discovery. We mean, Cameron’s letter—addressed to Utah Senator Mike Lee, head of the Senate’s antitrust subcommittee—straight-up called Sarandos “a good person and a clever business leader and innovator”! Sure, it did so in the midst of also calling his company’s plans to buy Warner Bros. “disastrous for the theatrical motion picture business that I have dedicated my life’s work to,” but still: James Cameron’s never called us good people!

But Sarandos just can’t be happy, per Deadline, going on Fox Business on Friday to complain that he’s “surprised and disappointed that James chose to be part of the Paramount disinformation campaign” surrounding the deal. Sarandos took special exception to the part of Cameron’s letter where he talks about an alleged 17-day theatrical window that the studio was supposedly committing to before funneling WBD’s movies onto the conveyer belt toward its big trough of streaming content. “I have never even uttered the words ’17-day window,'” Sarandos asserted during an appearance on Fox’s The Claman Countdown. “So I don’t know where it came from or why he would be part of that machine.”

“I met with James personally in late December,” Sarandos added, “And laid out for him our 45-day commitment to theatrical exhibition of films and to the Warner Bros slate. I have talked about that commitment in the press countless times. I swore under oath in front of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust that that’s what we would be doing.” But none of that seems to have convinced Cameron, who wrote in his letter—which entered the public record yesterday—that no matter what Sarandos says, Netflix will always be able to change its mind on the matter later.

If nothing else, this little back-and-forth makes it clear that Netflix is—despite having supposedly already won the contest by getting a bid for Warner Bros. accepted, while Paramount continues to try to bounce cash off the front door—still deep in the midst of what’s going to be a nasty messaging war with the David Ellison-owned studio over who will get to own WBD. (Possibly with some serious Congressional help: Lee piped up on social media already this weekend to lay out another list of questions he has for Netflix about the sale.) 

 
Show all 40 comments...
Keep scrolling for more great stories.

Final Destination Bloodlines team are sinking their teeth into a Venom animated movie

The next Venom movie may have Tom Hardy, in cartoon form, that is. 

Final Destination Bloodlines team are sinking their teeth into a Venom animated movie

Since performing his Last Dance, the world doesn’t seem to be clamoring for more tales of Venom. Frankly, the series more or less peaked when Venom made a beautiful statement of inclusion and acceptance, declaring, “We should be free to be who we be,” from the stage of a queer dance party in Venom: Let There Be Carnage. Though that scene would elicit congressional hearings about what role Venom has in portraying family values and how inclusion in the Venom-verse is actually a form of discrimination, the folks at Sony are looking to bring their big-tongued menace back to the screen. 

Per The Hollywood Reporter, the Final Destination Bloodlines guys, Zach Lipovsky and Adam B. Stein, are succumbing to the symbiote and are working on an animated Venom movie. There’s really not a ton of reporting on the movie, other than Tom Hardy may return in some capacity, either to voice Eddie Brock or produce the movie, which Sony Pictures Animation is making. 

Basically, the whole thing sounds like Sony, desperate to get an animated Spider-Man anything in theaters this decade, is getting antsy about when Phil Lord and Chris Miller will bring Spider-Verse back. The Spider-Verse movies have been ridiculously successful for the studio, with 2023’s Across The Spider-Verse grossing more than $690 million worldwide, nearly double its predecessor. However, that half a movie also ended on a cliffhanger, which has yet to be resolved. Beyond The Spider-Verse, the third film in the series, has been bounced around the schedule for years now and is currently slated for a June 2027 release, following numerous script and production delays. 

As for Lipovsky and Stein, their dance card is filling up. Last year, they were announced as writing Chris Columbus’ Gremlins 3, which will hopefully allow for some mean-spirited Final Destination gremlin action that Columbus hated so much in Gremlins 2. They’re also developing an original thriller called Long Lost, which THR describes as a mix of What Lies Beneath and Rosemary’s Baby.

 
Show all 24 comments...