Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Developments in Risk and Insurance Economics: The Past 50 Years

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Insurance

Abstract

This chapter reviews the evolution in risk and insurance economics over the past 50 years, first recalling the situation in 1973 and then presenting the developments and new approaches that have flourished since then. We argue that these developments were only possible because steady advances were made in the economics of risk and uncertainty and in financial theory. Insurance economics has grown in importance to become a central theme in modern economics, providing not only practical examples and original data to illustrate new theories but also inspiring new ideas that are relevant to the overall economy.

This survey is the revised and updated version of earlier surveys published by Henri Loubergé as “Risk and Insurance Economics 25 Years After” and “Developments in Risk and Insurance Economics: The Past 40 Years,” respectively, in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practices (No. 89, October 1998, pp. 540–567) and in the Handbook of Insurance, Second edition, G. Dionne (Ed.), Springer, 2013, Chapter 1, pp. 1–40. We thank Louis Eeckhoudt, Harris Schlesinger, and Richard Peter for their comments on successive versions and Claire Boisvert for the preparation of this version. The usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that three of these seven authors, George Akerlof, Kenneth Arrow, and Gary Becker, later received the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.

  2. 2.

    See Gollier (1992) for a review of the economic theory of risk exchanges, Drèze (1979) for an application to human capital, and Drèze (1990) for an application to securities and labor markets.

  3. 3.

    Actually, Borch’s theorem was already present in Borch (1960), but the 1960 article was primarily written for actuaries, whereas the 1962 Econometrica paper was addressed to economists.

  4. 4.

    Climate risk could be an example of a social risk that cannot be totally diversified. See Cummins et al. (2002) and Dionne and Desjardins (2022) for applications of the Borch model to climate risk management.

  5. 5.

    HARA = Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion. As noted by Drèze (1990), the linearity of the sharing rule follows from the linearity of the absolute risk tolerance implied by hyperbolic absolute risk aversion.

  6. 6.

    The question of whether or not “institutions” are needed to allocate risks in the economy was tackled later in the finance literature.

  7. 7.

    The applications of Borch’s theorem in the actuarial literature are reviewed by Lemaire (1990).

  8. 8.

    More precisely, Schlesinger (1997) considers one version of Arrow’s theorem: the case where the insurer is risk neutral and the insured is risk averse (risk aversion being defined by Schlesinger as preferences consistent with second-degree stochastic dominance). In this case, a straight deductible policy is optimal whenever the insurer’s management costs are proportional to the indemnity payment.

  9. 9.

    Optimal insurance coverage using a deductible was also analyzed by Pashigian et al. (1966) and Gould (1969).

  10. 10.

    Incomplete insurance may be obtained using a deductible or coinsurance (or both).

  11. 11.

    The survey of developments presented in the next three sections draws on the survey of insurance economics originally proposed by Dionne and Harrington (1992).

  12. 12.

    Other strange results were observed later on; for example, an increased loss probability has an ambiguous impact on insurance purchasing if the insured has DARA preferences and the insurer adjusts the premium to take the increased loss probability into account (Jang and Hadar 1995).

  13. 13.

    It is obvious that the paradox can be resolved if one introduces differential risk perceptions. If the insured overestimates the probability (or the amount) of loss, full insurance may be optimal even when the premium is loaded with a fixed proportional factor.

  14. 14.

    On a related theme, see also Doherty and Schlesinger (1990) for the case where the insurance contract itself is risky, due to a nonzero probability of insurer default. The paper shows that full insurance is not optimal under fair insurance pricing and that the usual comparative statics resulting from the single-risk model do not carry over to the model with default risk. Their work was extended by Cummins and Mahul (2003) to the case where the insurer and policyholder have divergent beliefs about the insurer default risk.

  15. 15.

    Hong et al. (2011) argued that correlation is not an adequate measure of stochastic dependence when expected utility is used. Turning to more general notions of positive and negative dependence, and focusing on coinsurance, they showed that the individual will purchase less than full (more than full) insurance if and only if the insurable risk is positively (negatively) expectation dependent with random initial wealth.

  16. 16.

    These theoretical advances closely followed similar advances in the theory of risk premiums under multiple sources of risk: Kihlstrom et al. (1981), Ross (1981), and Doherty et al. (1987). This literature on optimal insurance in presence of a background risk is closely linked to the literature on the demand for a risky asset, which was pioneered by Arrow (1963) in a single-risk setting and developed later to consider the impact of background risks: see, e.g., Tsetlin and Winkler (2005) and Li (2011).

  17. 17.

    This case corresponds to a negative cross-derivative of the two-attribute utility function (u12 ≤ 0). Eeckhoudt et al. (2007) showed that this is equivalent to “correlation aversion,” i.e., the aversion to losses simultaneously affecting the two attributes of utility (health and wealth, for example).

  18. 18.

    Following Eeckhoudt et al. (2007), the individual is then “correlation loving.” For that individual, in this case, purchasing more insurance against a loss in wealth helps to mitigate the adverse impact of a negative correlation between the two risks.

  19. 19.

    The following developments on this topic borrow from the literature review in Loubergé and Watt (2008).

  20. 20.

    Coinsurance must be excluded to avoid corner solutions of either no holding of the riskless asset or zero demand for insurance. Meyer and Meyer (1998) address the specific case of deductible insurance.

  21. 21.

    In this case, with increasing wealth, the rate of increase of the possible loss amount is higher than the rate of decrease of relative risk aversion.

  22. 22.

    Using Mossin’s (1968) approach, Jang and Hadar (1995) obtained that the effect of an increase in the probability of loss is, in this case, indeterminate if the utility function displays DARA, and that the demand for insurance decreases with a CARA or IARA utility.

  23. 23.

    See Schlesinger (2013) for a survey on insurance demand.

  24. 24.

    See also Courbage and Rey (2006) for an extension of this result to the case of two-argument utility functions, wealth and health.

  25. 25.

    The recent models are becoming very complex without generating less ambiguous results (Peter 2021a). A probability of loss equal to (greater than, lower than) 0.5 remains a crucial threshold for comparative statics analysis because it affects the direction of the variation of the variance and other statistical moments when we change the probability of loss in a two-state model. Moreover, it is not dependent on decision-makers’ risk behavior.

  26. 26.

    Note that all this literature on self-insurance and self-protection has been driving away from the study of the links between insurance demand and prevention. In addition, except for the paper by Lee (2012), it has focused on the case where prevention implies a monetary cost (prevention expenditures), instead of the case where prevention implies an effort producing a direct loss in utility, because the analysis of the latter case is more straightforward even if it is often applied in principal-agent models.

  27. 27.

    See also Wang and Li (2015).

  28. 28.

    But, like previous work, it deals with self-protection, leaving self-insurance aside.

  29. 29.

    See also the Geneva Risk Economics Lecture presented by Bleichrodt (2022) for another review with an emphasis on nonexpected utility. He also discusses how empirical research may help to understand the prevention puzzle.

  30. 30.

    Under the negligence rule, an injurer cannot be made liable for the losses imposed on a victim if the injurer has applied the appropriate level of care. In theoretical work, the appropriate level of care is the socially efficient level of care optimally chosen by a risk-averse potential injurer if the judgment-proof problem does not arise. This level balances the marginal benefits and marginal cost of care.

  31. 31.

    In addition, the injurer would run the risk of being denied indemnification by the insurer if it turned out ex post that the level of care had been inappropriate.

  32. 32.

    The orders of risk aversion, as defined by Segal and Spivak (1990), rest on the behavior of the risk premium in the limit, as the risk tends toward zero.

  33. 33.

    This result is reminiscent of the same result obtained under Hurwicz’s model of choice under risk: see Briys and Loubergé (1985).

  34. 34.

    An economic equilibrium is first-best efficient if it is Pareto optimal: it is impossible to organize a reallocation of resources that would increase the satisfaction of one individual without hurting at least one other individual. The first theorem of welfare economics states that any competitive equilibrium is Pareto optimal, and the second theorem states that a particular Pareto optimum may be reached by combining lump sum transfers among agents within a competitive economic system. In an efficient equilibrium, market prices reflect social opportunity costs.

  35. 35.

    In an interesting article on the history of the term “moral hazard,” Rowell and Connelly (2012) noted that the concepts of moral hazard and adverse selection have often been confused in the traditional insurance literature. They also remarked that this literature tends to attribute a pejorative meaning to “moral hazard,” often associating it with fraud, in contrast to the economic literature, which focuses on incentives and maintains that “moral hazard has in fact little to do with morality” (Pauly 1968).

  36. 36.

    Ex post moral hazard is particularly important in medical insurance, where claimed expenses are dependent on decisions made by the patient and the physician once illness has occurred. It is also important in workers’ compensation and in auto bodily injury insurance.

  37. 37.

    Dionne (1982) pointed out that moral hazard is also present when the insured event results in nonmonetary losses, for example the loss of an irreplaceable commodity.

  38. 38.

    Note that moral hazard is also present in the insurer–reinsurer relationship (see Jean-Baptiste and Santomero 2000). The success of index products in insurance securitization is partly due to the fact that they remove the moral hazard from the relationship between insurers and providers of reinsurance coverage (Doherty and Richter 2002).

  39. 39.

    The situation is of course different in regulated markets where information on retrospective rating is shared by the market.

  40. 40.

    At some point, this moral hazard problem becomes a fraud problem. See Picard (1996), Crocker and Morgan (1998), the special issue on fraud in The Journal of Risk and Insurance, September 2002 (Derrig 2002), and more recently Dionne et al. (2009). See Picard (2025) for a survey of the literature.

  41. 41.

    Insurance contracts are defined in terms of price and quantity, instead of price for any quantity. Insureds reveal their class by their choice from the menu of contracts, such as the choice of a deductible.

  42. 42.

    Stiglitz (1977) studied the monopolistic insurance case. Under asymmetric information, the monopolist insurer maximizes profit by supplying a menu of discriminating contracts. At the equilibrium situation, the high risks get some consumer surplus, but the low risks are restricted to partial insurance and do not get any surplus.

  43. 43.

    See Crocker and Snow (1985) for a review of these models, and Dionne et al. (2025) for a survey of adverse selection theory.

  44. 44.

    Other recent studies include those by Kim et al. (2009), Olivella and Vera-Hernández (2013), Dardanoni et al. (2018), and Geyer et al. (2020).

  45. 45.

    See Finkelstein and Poterba (2002, 2004).

  46. 46.

    See Makki and Somwaru (2001).

  47. 47.

    See Cawley and Philipson (1999) and Hendel and Lizzeri (2003).

  48. 48.

    See Cutler and Reber (1998) and Cardon and Hendel (2001).

  49. 49.

    Advantageous selection can lead to too much insurance being purchased if there are transaction costs and competition among insurers drives profits to zero. In equilibrium, the marginal cost of insurance exceeds the market price (see Einav and Finkelstein 2011). The possibility of advantageous selection was first introduced by Hemenway (1990), who termed it “propitious” selection, and it was later analyzed by De Meza and Webb (2001).

  50. 50.

    Note, however, that there exist alternative views on the welfare effect of asymmetric information. Using a two-period model where insureds have the option to switch insurers in the second period, de Garidel-Thoron (2005) showed that information sharing among insurers is welfare-decreasing. This is because it reduces the set of viable long-term contracts available to individuals in the first-period competition game.

  51. 51.

    In Kunreuther and Pauly (1985), the insurers have no information about other contracts their customers might write. For this reason, price-quantity contracts are unavailable. The equilibrium is a pooling equilibrium with partial insurance for the good risks, as in Pauly (1974).

  52. 52.

    In the first period, insureds may choose either a pooling contract with partial coverage and possible renegotiation in the second year, or the Rothschild-Stiglitz contract designed for high risks.

  53. 53.

    For good risks who do not file a claim in the first period, the reward takes the form of additional coverage in the second period.

  54. 54.

    See also Bonato and Zweifel (2002) on the use of multiple risks to improve the assessment of loss probability.

  55. 55.

    See Crocker et al. (2025) for a recent survey.

  56. 56.

    See Dionne and Rothschild (2014) for a framework to evaluate the economic consequences of legalized and banned risk classification systems, both in a static environment and a dynamic environment with learning.

  57. 57.

    This is an example of the well-known result that additional public information may have adverse welfare consequences (see, e.g., Arrow 1978).

  58. 58.

    In contrast, Doherty and Thistle (1996) found that additional private information has no value if there is no treatment option conditional on this information.

  59. 59.

    See also Zweifel and Ghermi (1990) for a study using Swiss data.

  60. 60.

    Berry-Stölzle and Born (2012) provide an empirical account of the deregulation introduced in Germany in 1994. They find evidence of a significant price decrease in highly competitive lines, offset by higher prices in the other lines.

  61. 61.

    AIG’s failure is mainly attributed to two causes. First, a subsidiary of AIG—AIG Financial Products—became heavily involved in the writing of credit default swaps. Second, another subsidiary, operating in the life branch, had engaged in securities-lending programs that were severely hurt by the onset of the subprime crisis. In either case, insurance operations were not concerned.

  62. 62.

    The Solvency II regulation is presented and analyzed in Eling et al. (2007), Gatzert and Wesker (2012), and Doff (2025).

  63. 63.

    See Harrington et al. (2013) for a survey of the literature.

  64. 64.

    See, in particular, Froot (1999a, 1999b), OECD (2005), Wharton Risk Management Center (2007), Kunreuther and Michel-Kerjan (2009), and Courbage and Stahel (2012).

  65. 65.

    Monti (2011) provides a recent review of public–private arrangements that already exist in the OECD area.

  66. 66.

    See Boubakri (2011), Boubakri and Valéry (2025), Anderloni et al. (2020), and the September 2011 special issue of The Journal of Risk and Insurance for recent surveys of corporate governance in the insurance industry.

  67. 67.

    The similarity between option contracts and insurance policies was stressed by Briys and Loubergé (1983).

  68. 68.

    See also Loubergé (1983) for an application to international reinsurance operations, taking foreign exchange risk into account, and MacMinn and Witt (1987) for a related model.

  69. 69.

    Myers and Cohn (1987) extended the model to multiperiod cash flows, while Kraus and Ross (1982) considered the application to insurance of the more general arbitrage pricing theory.

  70. 70.

    The same kind of argument was used by Doherty and Tinic (1981) to question the motivation of reinsurance demand by insurers.

  71. 71.

    Rochet and Villeneuve (2011) showed that cash-poor firms should hedge using financial derivatives but not insure, whereas the opposite is true for cash-rich firms.

  72. 72.

    See Liebenberg and Hoyt (2025) for a recent review of this literature, and Cummins et al. (2009) for the effect of risk management on the efficiency of insurance firms.

  73. 73.

    The convergence between reinsurance and investment banking was emphasized by Cummins (2005).

  74. 74.

    The debate has regained importance after the 2008 financial market crisis and the collapse of AIG. Large insurance companies have been ranked with banks in the group of “Systemic Important Financial Institutions” (SIFI) and are threatened to become subject to the same regulations as banks. This is an occasion for the insurance industry to underscore the differences between banking and insurance (see Lehmann and Hofmann 2010; Geneva Association 2010).

  75. 75.

    Public insurance may also be justified by equity considerations, e.g., in medical insurance.

  76. 76.

    Adding collateralized reinsurance, ILWs, sidecars, and other financial coverage products, the outstanding international volume is at about $60B (Artemis website).

  77. 77.

    In the US, where a National Flood Insurance program has already existed for long, and where California has established a government earthquake insurance program (the California Earthquake Authority), the possible creation of state or regional catastrophe funds is being hotly debated, given the unconvincing examples of the two abovementioned programs (see Klein and Wang 2009).

  78. 78.

    The early options and futures on four narrow-based indices of natural catastrophes were replaced in October 1995 by call spreads on nine broad-based indices. Lewis and Murdock (1996) proposed to have the same kind of contract supplied by federal authorities in order to complete the reinsurance market.

  79. 79.

    Harrington and Niehaus (1999) had reached the conclusion that basis risk would not be a significant problem for Property Claims Services (PCS) derivative contracts, but later on, Cummins et al. (2004) reached a different conclusion, attributing the lack of success to basis risk. One might add that, possibly, the failure was due to the absence of arbitrage trading. Arbitrage trading between a derivative market and the market for the underlying instrument is essential to the provision of liquidity in derivatives trading for hedging and speculation purposes. However, in the case of PCS option contracts, such trading was impossible. The only market for the trading of insurance portfolios is the reinsurance market, which is not liquid enough for use as a vehicle in arbitrage trading.

  80. 80.

    The pricing of these contracts was addressed by Perrakis and Boloorrforoosh (2018).

  81. 81.

    Exposure to moral hazard for the investor is traded against basis risk for the sponsor.

  82. 82.

    The risk of default by the reinsurance provider is a concern in the high-layer segment of the reinsurance market.

  83. 83.

    Still, it remains that the use of insurance-linked securities raises sensitive issues in terms of regulation. Not because these instruments would represent a danger for the stability of the financial system, but because regulators, more particularly in the US, are reluctant to consider them as genuine alternative mechanisms for risk transfer: see Klein and Wang (2009).

  84. 84.

    The success with CAT bonds aroused interest for other insurance-linked securities, particularly in the life insurance sector (mortality bonds, longevity bonds): see Cowley and Cummins (2005), Lin and Cox (2005), Albertini and Barrieu (2009), Cummins and Weiss (2009), and Chen and Cox (2009).

  85. 85.

    See Cummins (2012) for a comprehensive report on the state of the market at year-end 2011, and the recent survey by Barrieu et al. (2025).

  86. 86.

    Other innovations, such as sidecars and ILWs, are different in nature from those presented in this section. They are innovations that improve the capacity of the reinsurance market, without introducing an alternative or complement to reinsurance contracts.

References

Publications until 1973

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84:488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1953) Le rôle des valeurs boursières pour la répartition la meilleure des risques. In: Econométrie, Fondements et applications de la théorie du risque en économétrie. CNRS, Paris, pp 41–47. English version (1964): The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. Rev Econ Stud 31:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 53:941–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1970) Insurance, risk and resource allocation. In: Arrow KJ (ed) Essays in the theory of risk bearing. North Holland, pp 134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1960) The safety loading of reinsurance premiums. Scand Actuar J 43:163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica 30:424–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter RL (1972) Economics and insurance. PH Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1959) Theory of value. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich J, Becker G (1972) Market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection. J Polit Econ 80:623–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J Polit Econ 56:279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould JP (1969) The expected utility hypothesis and the selection of optimal deductibles for a given insurance policy. J Bus 42:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (1971) Risk aversion, insurance and the future. Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene M (1973) Risk and insurance. South Western

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurley JG, Shaw ES (1960) Money in theory of finance. Brookings, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond JD (1968) Essays in the theory of risk and insurance. Scott Foresman

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow P (1973) Cartels, competition, and regulation in the property-liability insurance industry. Bell J Econ 4(2):375–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom RE, Pauly M (1971) The role of insurance in the allocation of risk. Am Econ Rev 61:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) Security prices, risk and maximal gain from diversification. J Financ 20:587–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahr W (1964) Einführung in die Versicherungswirtschaft. Duncker & Humblot

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz HM (1959) Portfolio selection – efficient diversification of investments. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehr R, Hedges B (1963) Risk management in the business enterprise. Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen JB, Goshay RC (1967) Portfolio selection in financial intermediaries: a new approach. J Financ Quant Anal 2:166–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34:768–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin J (1968) Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J Polit Econ 79:553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian BP, Schkade L, Menefee GH (1966) The selection of an optimal deductible for a given insurance policy. J Bus 39:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M (1968) The economics of moral hazard: comment. Am Econ Rev 58:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer I (1956) Insurance and economic theory. Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am Econ Rev 63:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stigliz J (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J Econ Theory 2:225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) Foundation of statistics. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19:425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V (1968) Optimal insurance coverage. J Polit Econ 79:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87:355–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence M, Zeckhauser R (1971) Insurance, information and individual action. Am Econ Rev 61:380–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Publications after 1973

  • Aase K (1999) An equilibrium model of catastrophe insurance futures and spreads. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 24:69–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbring J, Chiappori PA, Pinquet J (2003) Moral hazard and dynamic insurance data. J Eur Econ Assoc 1:767–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertini L, Barrieu P (2009) The handbook of insurance-linked securities. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard M, Cresta JP, Rochet JC (1997) Pooling and separating equilibria in insurance markets with adverse selection and distribution costs. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 22:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen F (1985) Repeated principal-agent relationships with lending and borrowing. Econ Lett 17:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose JM, Carroll AM, Regan L (2013) The economics of liability insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 315–347

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ames DA, Hines CS, Sankara J (2018) Board risk committees: insurer financial strength rating and performance. J Account Public Policy 37(2):130–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderloni L, Moro O, Tanda A (2020) Governance and performance in insurance companies: a bibliometric analysis and a meta-analysis. Int J Econ Financ 12(11):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AON (2023) Weather, climate and catastrophe insight. https://www.aon.com/weather-climate-catastrophe/index.aspx

  • Arnone M, Bianchi ML, Quaranta AG, Tassinari GL (2021) Catastrophic risks and the pricing of catastrophe equity put options. Comput Manag Sci 18:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R (1992) Moral hazard and competitive insurance markets. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 325–358

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, Stiglitz JE (1990) The welfare economics of moral hazard. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance: essays in the memory of Karl Borch. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1974) Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles. Scand Actuar J 1:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1978) Risk allocation and information: some recent theoretical developments. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 8:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auñon-Nerin D, Ehling P (2008) Why firms purchase property insurance. J Financ Econ 90:298–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker T, Siegelman P (2013) The law and economics of liability insurance: a theoretical and empirical review. In: Arlen JH, Paige NZ (eds) Research handbook on the economics of torts. Elgaronline

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrese J, Doerpinghaus H, Nelson J (1995) Do independent agent insurers provide superior service? The insurance marketing puzzle. J Risk Insur 62:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrieu P, El Karoui N (2002) Reinsuring climatic risk using optimally designed weather bonds. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 27:87–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrieu P, Loubergé H (2009) Hybrid cat bonds. J Risk Insur 76:547–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrieu P, Braun A, Makariou D (2025) Catastrophe bonds. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer D, Powell L, Su B, Zanjani GH (2023) Life insurance and annuity pricing during the financial crisis, revisited. Available on SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3799325

  • Bauer D, Phillips RD, Zanjani GH (2025) Pricing insurance risk: reconciling theory and practice. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger A, Cummins D, Weiss M (1997) The coexistence of multiple distribution systems for financial services: the case of property-liability insurance. J Bus 70:515–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry-Stölzle T, Born P (2012) The effect of regulation on insurance pricing: the case of Germany. J Risk Insur 79:129–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biener C, Eling M (2012) Insurability in microinsurance markets: an analysis of problems and potential solutions. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 37:77–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biger N, Kahane Y (1978) Risk considerations in insurance ratemaking. J Risk Insur 45:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt H (2022) The prevention puzzle. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 47(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonato D, Zweifel P (2002) Information about multiple risks: the case of building and content insurance. J Risk Insur 69:469–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond EW, Crocker KJ (1991) Smoking, skydiving and knitting: the endogenous categorization of risks in insurance markets with asymmetric information. J Polit Econ 99:177–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond EW, Crocker KJ (1997) Hardball and the soft touch: the economics of optimal insurance contracts with costly state verification and endogenous monitoring costs. J Public Econ 63:239–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borch K (1974) Capital markets and the supervision of insurance companies. J Risk Insur 41:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born P, Klimaszewski-Blettner B (2013) Should I stay or should I go? The impact of natural disasters and regulation on U.S. property insurers’ supply decisions. J Risk Insur 80(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born P, Viscusi WK (2006) The catastrophic effects of natural disasters on insurance markets. J Risk Uncertain 33(1/2):55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N (2011) Corporate governance and issues from the insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N, Valéry P (2025) Corporate governance issues from the insurance industry: updated review. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N, Dionne G, Triki T (2008) Consolidation and value creation in the insurance industry: the role of governance. J Bank Financ 32:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Dionne G (1989a) More on insurance, protection and risk. Can J Econ 22:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Dionne G (1989b) An empirical analysis of moral hazard and experience rating. Rev Econ Stat 71:128–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Jacquier E, Van Norden S (2012) Are underwriting cycles real and forecastable. J Risk Insur 79(4):995–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan MJ, Schwartz E (1976) The pricing of equity-linked life insurance policies with an asset value guarantee. J Financ Econ 3:195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E (1988) On the theory of rational insurance purchasing in a continuous time model. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 13:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, de Varenne F (1994) Life insurance in a contingent claims framework: pricing and regulatory implications. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 19:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Loubergé H (1983) Le contrat d’assurance comme option de vente. Finance 4:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Loubergé H (1985) On the theory of rational insurance purchasing. J Financ 40:577–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Schlesinger H (1990) Risk aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection. South Econ J 57:458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Kahane Y, Kroll Y (1988) Voluntary insurance coverage, compulsory insurance, and risky-riskless portfolio opportunities. J Risk Insur 55:713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Dionne G, Eeckhoudt E (1989) More on insurance as a Giffen good. J Risk Uncertain 2:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briys E, Schlesinger H, von Schulenburg JM (1991) Reliability of risk management: market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection reconsidered. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 16:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballé J, Pomansky A (1996) Mixed risk aversion. J Econ Theory 71:485–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagle J, Harrington SE (1995) Insurance supply with capacity constraints and endogenous insolvency risk. J Risk Uncertain 11:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon J, Hendel I (2001) Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the National Health Expenditure Survey. RAND J Econ 32:408–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley J, Philipson T (1999) An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. Am Econ Rev 89:827–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain S, Tennyson S (1998) Capital shocks and merger activity in the property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 65:563–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YM, Ehrlich I (1985) Insurance, protection from risk and risk bearing. Can J Econ 18:574–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang PM, Peng JL, Fan CK (2011) A comparison of bancassurance and traditional insurer sales channels. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 36:76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Cox S (2009) Modeling mortality with jumps: applications to mortality securitization. J Risk Insur 76:727–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Wong KA, Lee HC (1999) Underwriting cycles in Asia. J Risk Insur 66:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Elyasani E, Jia J (2011) Institutional ownership stability and risk-taking: evidence from the life-health insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:609–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney M, Loubergé H (1986) Risk aversion and the composition of wealth in the demand for full insurance coverage. Schweiz Z Volkswirtsch Stat 122:359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA, Salanié B (2000) Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. J Polit Econ 108:56–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA, Salanié B (2013) Asymmetric information in insurance markets: predictions and tests. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 397–422

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA, Macho I, Rey P, Salanié B (1994) Repeated moral hazard: the role of memory, commitment and the access to credit markets. Eur Econ Rev 38:1527–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori PA, Durand F, Geoffard PY (1998) Moral hazard and the demand for physician services: first lessons from a French natural experiment. Eur Econ Rev 42:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Hardigree D, Thistle P (2002) The property-liability insurance cycle: a comparison of alternative models. South Econ J 68:530–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (2005) Asymmetric information and learning in the automobile insurance market. Rev Econ Stat 87:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Dehejia R (2004) The effects of automobile insurance and accident liabilities laws on traffic fatalities. J Law Econ 47:357–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Einav L (2007) Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Am Econ Rev 97(3):745–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 77:39–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PJ, Graham DA (1977) The demand for insurance production: the case of irreplaceable commodities. Q J Econ 91:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R, Hayes B (1987) Multi-period insurance contracts. Int J Ind Organ 5:211–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Rey B (2006) Prudence and optimal prevention for health risks. Health Econ 15:1323–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Rey B (2012) Optimal prevention and other risks in a two-period model. Math Soc Sci 63:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Stahel W (2012) Extreme events and insurance: 2011 annus horribilis. Geneva reports no 5. Geneva Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Rey B, Treich N (2013) Prevention and precaution. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 185–204

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Courbage C, Loubergé H, Peter R (2017) Optimal prevention for multiple risks. J Risk Insur 84(3):899–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley A, Cummins JD (2005) Securitization of life insurance assets and liabilities. J Risk Insur 72:193–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Morgan J (1998) Is honesty the best policy? Curtailing insurance fraud through optimal incentive contracts. J Polit Econ 106:355–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (1985) The efficiency of competitive equilibria in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Public Econ 26:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (1986) The efficiency effects of categorical discrimination in the insurance industry. J Polit Econ 94:321–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (2008) Background risk and the performance of insurance markets under adverse selection. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 33:137–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Snow A (2011) Multidimensional screening in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Risk Insur 78:287–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker KJ, Rothschild C, Snow A (2025) The theory of risk classification. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (1988) Risk-based premiums for insurance guaranty funds. J Financ 43:823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2005) Convergence in wholesale financial services: reinsurance and investment banking. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 30:187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2007) Reinsurance for natural and man-made catastrophes in the United States: current state of the market and regulatory reforms. Risk Manag Insur Rev 10:179–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2008) Cat bonds and other risk-linked securities: state of the market and recent developments. Risk Manag Insur Rev 11:23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD (2012) Cat bonds and other risk-linked securities: product design and evolution of the market. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1997467 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1997467

  • Cummins JD, Danzon P (1997) Price, financial quality, and capital flows in insurance markets. J Financ Intermed 6:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N (2002) Capitalization of the property-liability insurance industry: overview. J Financ Serv Res 21:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N (2006) The economics of insurance intermediaries. J Risk Insur 73:359–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Geman H (1995) Pricing catastrophe futures and call spreads. J Fixed Income 4:46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Harrington SE (1985) Property-liability insurance rate regulation: estimation of underwriting betas using quarterly profit data. J Risk Insur 52:16–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Harrington SE (1987) The impact of rate regulation on property-liability insurance loss ratios: a cross-sectional analysis with individual firm data. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 12:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Mahul O (2003) Optimal insurance with divergent beliefs about insurer total default risk. J Risk Uncertain 27:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Nini G (2002) Optimal capital utilization by financial firms: evidence from the property-liability insurance industry. J Financ Serv Res 21:15–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Outreville JF (1987) An international analysis of underwriting cycles in property-liability insurance. J Risk Insur 54:246–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Vanderhei JL (1979) A note on the relative efficiency of property-liability insurance distribution systems. Bell J Econ 10:709–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Weiss M (2009) Convergence of insurance and financial markets: hybrid and securitized risk-transfer solutions. J Risk Insur 76:493–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Xie X (2008) Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: productivity and efficiency effects. J Bank Financ 32(1):30–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Tennyson S, Weiss M (1999a) Consolidation and efficiency in the US life insurance industry. J Bank Financ 23:325–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Weiss M, Zi H (1999b) Organizational form and efficiency: the coexistence of stock and mutual property-liability insurers. Manag Sci 45:1254–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Phillips RD, Tennyson S (2001) Regulation, political influence and the price of automobile insurance. J Insur Regul 20:9–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Doherty N, Lo A (2002) Can insurers pay for the “big one”? Measuring the capacity of the insurance market to respond to catastrophic losses. J Bank Financ 26:557–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Lalonde D, Phillips RD (2004) The basis risk of index-linked catastrophic loss securities. J Financ Econ 71:77–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Dionne G, Gagné R, Nouira A (2009) Efficiency of insurance firms with endogenous risk management and financial intermediation activities. J Prod Anal 32(2):145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JD, Klumpes P, Weiss MA (2015) Mergers and acquisitions in the global insurance industry: valuation effects. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 40(3):444–473. ISSN 1018-5895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler D, Reber S (1998) Paying for health insurance: the trade-off between competition and adverse selection. Q J Econ 113:433–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP (1988) Application of economic theories of regulation to the property-liability insurance industry. J Insur Regul 7:19–52

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP, Doherty N (1990) Adverse selection, private information and lowballing in insurance markets. J Bus 63:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy SP, France VG (1992) Catastrophe futures: a better hedge for insurers. J Risk Insur 59:575–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dachraoui K, Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L, Godfroid P (2004) Comparative mixed risk aversion: definition and application to self-protection and willingness to pay. J Risk Uncertain 29:261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby B (1983) Adverse selection and statistical discrimination: an analysis of Canadian automobile insurance market. J Public Econ 20:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlby B (1992) Testing for asymmetric information in Canadian automobile insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 423–443

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Danzon PM (1983) Rating bureaus in US property-liability insurance markets: anti or pro-competitive? Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 8:371–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danzon PM, Harrington SE (1992) The demand for and supply of liability insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 25–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dardanoni V, Forcina A, Li Donni P (2018) Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets: a multivariate ordered regression approach. J Risk Insur 85(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Garidel-Thoron T (2005) Welfare-improving asymmetric information in dynamic insurance markets. J Polit Econ 113:121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meza D, Webb D (2001) Advantageous selection in insurance markets. RAND J Econ 32:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2020) Climate risk: regulators sharpen their forces, p 20. https://www2.deloitte.com/gr/en/blog/risk-advisory/ 2020/financial-risks-stemming-from-climate-change.html

  • Derrig R (2002) Insurance fraud. J Risk Insur 69:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins D, Dionne G, N’Golo K (2022) Reinsurance demand and liquidity creation: a search for bicausality. J Empir Financ 66:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (1982) Moral hazard and state-dependent utility function. J Risk Insur 49:405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (1983) Adverse selection and repeated insurance contracts. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 8:316–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G (2025) Causality in empirical analyses with emphasis on asymmetric information and risk management. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Desjardins D (2022) A re-examination of the U.S. insurance market’s capacity to pay catastrophe losses. Risk Manag Insur Rev 25(4):515–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Doherty N (1994) Adverse selection, commitment and renegotiation: extension to and evidence from insurance markets. J Polit Econ 102:209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1984) Insurance and saving: some further results. Insur Math Econ 3:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1985) Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion. Econ Lett 17:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Eeckhoudt L (1988) Increasing risk and self-protection activities. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 13:132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Gollier C (1992) Comparative statics under multiple sources of risk with applications to insurance demand. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 17:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Harrington SE (1992) An introduction to insurance economics. In: Dionne G, Harrington SE (eds) Foundations of insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 1–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Lasserre P (1985) Adverse selection, repeated insurance contracts and announcement strategy. Rev Econ Stud 52:719–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Lasserre P (1987) Dealing with moral hazard and adverse selection simultaneously. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Li J (2011) The impact of prudence on optimal prevention revisited. Econ Lett 113:147–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Li J (2014) When can expected utility handle first-order risk aversion? J Econ Theory 154:403–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Liu Y (2021) Effects of insurance incentives on road safety: evidence from a natural experiment in China. Scand J Econ 123(2):453–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Rothschild C (2014) Economic effects of risk classification bans. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 39:184–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, St-Michel P (1991) Workers’ compensation and moral hazard. Rev Econ Stat 73(1):236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Gourieroux C, Vanasse C (2001) Testing for evidence of adverse selection in the automobile insurance market: a comment. J Polit Econ 109:444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Giuliano F, Picard P (2009) Optimal auditing with scoring: theory and application to insurance fraud. Manag Sci 55:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Michaud PC, Dahchour M (2013) Separating moral hazard from adverse selection and learning in automobile insurance: longitudinal evidence from France. J Eur Econ Assoc 11(4):897–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne G, Fombaron N, Mimra W (2025) Adverse selection in insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Doff R (2025) Risk and solvency regulation in Europe. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N (1984) Portfolio efficient insurance buying strategies. J Risk Insur 51:205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N (1997) Corporate insurance: competition from capital markets and financial institutions. Assurances 65:63–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Dionne G (1993) Insurance with undiversifiable risk: contract structure and organizational form of insurance firms. J Risk Uncertain 6:187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Eeckhoudt L (1995) Optimal insurance without expected utility: the dual theory and the linearity of insurance contracts. J Risk Uncertain 10:157–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Garven JR (1986) Price regulation in property-liability insurance: a contingent claims approach. J Financ 41:1031–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Garven JR (1995) Insurance cycles: interest rates and the capacity constraint model. J Bus 68:383–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Jung HJ (1993) Adverse selection when loss severities differ: first-best and costly equilibria. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 18:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Kang HB (1988) Price instability for a financial intermediary: interest rates and insurance price cycles. J Bank Financ 12:191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Phillips RD (2002) Keeping up with the Joneses: changing rating standards and the buildup of capital by U.S. property-liability insurers. J Financ Serv Res 21:55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Posey L (1998) On the value of a checkup: adverse selection, moral hazard and the value of information. J Risk Insur 65:189–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Richter A (2002) Moral hazard, basis risk, and gap insurance. J Risk Insur 69(1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1983a) Optimal insurance in incomplete markets. J Polit Econ 91:1045–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1983b) The optimal deductible for an insurance policy when initial wealth is random. J Bus 56:555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1990) Rational insurance purchasing: considerations of contract non-performance. Q J Econ 105:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1995) Severity risk and the adverse selection of frequency risk. J Risk Insur 62:649–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Schlesinger H (2002) Insurance contracts and securitization. J Risk Insur 69:45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Thistle P (1996) Adverse selection with endogenous information in insurance markets. J Public Econ 63:83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Tinic S (1981) Reinsurance under conditions of capital market equilibrium. J Financ 36:949–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty N, Loubergé H, Schlesinger H (1987) Risk premiums with multiple sources of risk. Scand Actuar J 1-2:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J (1979) Human capital and risk-bearing. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 12:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J (1990) The role of securities and labor contracts in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror DM, Eling M (2025) Microinsurance: promoting resilience and welfare in the informational sector. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart M, Räthke-Döppner S (2010) The quality of insurance intermediaries services – empirical evidence for Germany. J Risk Insur 77:667–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C (2005) The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Economic Theory 26:989–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Kimball M (1992) Background risk, prudence, and the demand for insurance. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 239–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1991) Increases in risk and deductible insurance. J Econ Theory 55:435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1996) Changes in background risk and risk-taking behavior. Econometrica 64:683–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Meyer J, Ormiston MB (1997) The interactions between the demand for insurance and insurable assets. J Risk Uncertain 14:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Rey B, Schlesinger H (2007) A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Manag Sci 53:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Huang R, Tzeng L (2012) Precautionary effort: a new look. J Risk Insur 79(2):585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einav L, Finkelstein A (2011) Selection in insurance markets: theory and empirics in pictures. J Econ Perspect 25:115–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einav L, Finkelstein A, Cullen M (2010) Estimating welfare in insurance markets using variations in prices. Q J Econ 125:877–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen R (1990) Problems of equilibria in insurance markets with asymmetric information. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 123–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekern S, Persson SA (1996) Exotic unit-linked life insurance contracts. In: Loubergé H, Subrahmanyam M (eds) Financial risk and derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 35–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eling M, Gemmo I, Guxha D, Schmeiser H (2024) Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 49:75–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eling M, Schmeiser H (2010) Insurance and the credit crisis: impact and ten consequences for risk management and supervision. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory Pract 35:9–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eling M, Schmeiser H, Schmit J (2007) The Solvency II process: overview and critical analysis. Risk Manag Insur Rev 10:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young (2008) Strategic business risk: insurance. https://erm.ncsu.edu/library/article/business-risk-2008/

  • Fagart MC, Picard P (1999) Optimal insurance under random auditing. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 24:29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairley W (1979) Investment income and profit margins in property-liability insurance: theory and empirical results. Bell J Econ 10:192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang H, Keane M, Silverman D (2008) Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116:303–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure MG (2014) The complementary roles of liability regulation and insurance in safety management: theory and practice. J Risk Res 17:689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96:938–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2002) Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Econ J 112:28–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2004) Adverse selection in insurance markets: policyholder evidence from the U.K. annuity market. J Polit Econ 112:183–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finken S, Laux C (2009) Catastrophe bonds and reinsurance: the competitive effect of information-sensitive triggers. J Risk Insur 76:579–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finsinger J, Pauly M (1984) Reserve levels and reserve requirements for profi-maximizing insurance firms. In: Bamberg G, Spremann K (eds) Risk and capital. Springer Verlag, pp 160–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fluet C, Pannequin F (1997) Complete versus incomplete insurance contracts under adverse selection with multiple risks. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 22:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (1999a) The evolving market for catastrophic event risk. Risk Manag Insur Rev 2:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (1999b) The financing of catastrophe risk. University of Chicago Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Froot K (2001) The market for catastrophic risk: a clinical examination. J Financ Econ 60:529–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot K, O’Connell P (2008) On the pricing of intermediated risks: theory and application to catastrophe reinsurance. J Bank Financ 32:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froot K, Sharfstein D, Stein J (1993) Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financial policies. J Financ 48:1629–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1990) Moral hazard and renegotiation in agency contracts. Econometrica 58:1279–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR (1987) On the application of finance theory to the insurance firm. J Financ Serv Res 1:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR, Lamm-Tenant J (2003) The demand for reinsurance: theory and tests. Insur Risk Manag 71:217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven JR, Loubergé H (1996) Reinsurance, taxes and efficiency: a contingent claims model of insurance market equilibrium. J Financ Intermed 5:74–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatzert N, Wesker H (2012) A comparative assessment of Basel II/III and Solvency II. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 37(3):539–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneva Association (2010) Systemic risk in insurance – an analysis of insurance and financial stability. The Geneva Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer A, Kremslehner D, Mürmann A (2020) Asymmetric information in automobile insurance: evidence from driving behavior. J Risk Insur 87(4):969–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (1992) Economic theory of risk exchanges: a review. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 3–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (1995) The comparative statics of changes in risk revisited. J Econ Theory 66:522–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (2003) To insure or not to insure? An insurance puzzle. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 28:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C (2005) Some aspects of the economics of catastrophe risk insurance. CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 1409. Also available on SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=668384

  • Gollier C (2024) Evaluating sustainability actions under uncertainty: the role of improbable extreme scenarios. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 49:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Pratt JW (1996) Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64:1109–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Scarmure P (1994) The spillover effect of compulsory insurance. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 19:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlee E (2006) Increased risk-bearing with backroung risk. Top Theor Econ 6:1–31. Published by De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-598X.1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1995) Second best insurance contract design in an incomplete market. Scand J Econ 97:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier C, Schlesinger H (1996) Arrow’s theorem on the optimality of deductibles: a stochastic dominance approach. Economic Theory 7:359–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace MF (2023) Loss ratio dynamics. Risk Manag Insur Rev 26(3):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace MF (2025) Regulation of insurance markets in the US. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace MF, Hotchkiss JL (1995) External impacts on the property-liability insurance cycle. J Risk Insur 62:738–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenier R (2019) The role of catastrophe models in the evolution of the flood insurance market. Air Worldwide Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Gron A (1994) Evidence of capacity constraints in insurance markets. J Law Econ 37:349–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S, Hart OD (1983) An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51:7–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso L, Jappelli T (1998) Background uncertainty and the demand for insurance against insurable risks. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 23:7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley J (1993) A cointegration analysis of the relationship between underwriting margins and interest rates: 1930-1989. J Risk Insur 60:480–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H (1985) The organization of insurance companies: mutual versus stock. J Law Econ Org 1:125–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1984) The impact of rate regulation on prices and underwriting results in the property-liability insurance industry: a survey. J Risk Insur 51:577–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1987) A note on the impact of auto insurance rate regulation. Rev Econ Stat 69:166–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (1988) Prices and profits in the liability insurance market. In: Litan R, Winston C (eds) Liability: perspectives and policy. The Brooking Institution, pp 42–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE (2009) The financial crisis, systemic risk, and the future of insurance regulation. J Risk Insur 76:785–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE, Danzon P (1994) Price-cutting in liability insurance markets. J Bus 67:511–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE, Niehaus G (1999) Basis risk with PCS catastrophe insurance derivative contracts. J Risk Insur 66:49–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE, Niehaus G (2002) Capital structure decisions in the insurance industry: stocks versus mutual. J Financ Serv Res 21:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SE, Niehaus G, Yu T (2013) Insurance price volatility and underwriting cycles. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 647–667

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW (2024) Risk preferences and risk perceptions in insurance experiments: some methodological challenges. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 49:127–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison H, Karolyi GA, Scheinkman JA (2020) Climate finance. Rev Financ Stud 33(3):1011–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He E, Sommer D (2011) CEO turnover and ownership structure: evidence from the US property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:673–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig MF (1987) Some recent developments in the theory of competition in markets with adverse selection. Eur Econ Rev 31:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig MF (1988) A note on the specification of interfirm communication in insurance markets with adverse selection. J Econ Theory 46:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Laffont JJ (1975) On moral hazard in general equilibrium. J Econ Theory 10:8–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway D (1990) Propitious selection. Q J Econ 105:1063–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendel I, Lizzeri A (2003) The role of commitment in dynamic contracts: evidence from life insurance. Q J Econ 118:299–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriet D, Klimenko N, Rochet JC (2016) The dynamics of insurance prices. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 41(1):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RD (1979) Profit regulation in property-liability insurance. Bell J Econ 10:172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RD, Modigliani F (1986) The Massachusetts model of profit regulation in nonlife insurance: theory and empirical results. In: Cummins JD, Harrington SE (eds) Fair rate of return in property-liability insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard JI, Tennyson S (2025) Insurance distribution systems. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho CL, Lai GC, Lee JP (2013) Organizational structure, board composition, and risk taking in the US property casualty insurance industry. J Risk Insur 80(1):169–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann A, Peter R (2015) Multivariate prevention decisions: safe today or sorry tomorrow? Econ Lett 128:51–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann A, Peter R (2016) Self-insurance, self-protection, and saving: on consumption smoothing and risk management. J Risk Insur 83(3):719–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J Econ 10:74–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SK, Lew KO, MacMinn R, Brockett P (2011) Mossin’s theorem given random initial wealth. J Risk Insur 78:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosios AJ, Peters M (1989) Repeated insurance contracts with adverse selection and limited commitment. Q J Econ 104:229–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy M (1982) Categorizing risks in the insurance industry. Q J Econ 97:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy M, Robson RJ (1981) Insurance as a Giffen good. Econ Lett 8:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt R, Liebenberg A (2011) The value of enterprise risk management. J Risk Insur 78:795–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt R, Mustard D, Powell L (2006) The effectiveness of state legislation mitigating moral hazard: evidence from automobile insurance. J Law Econ 49:427–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang LY, Lai G, McNamara M, Wang J (2011) Corporate governance and efficiency: Evidence from US property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:519–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman G, Mayers D, Smith CW (1983) Optimal insurance policy indemnity schedules. Bell J Econ 14:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito R (1979) The effects of price regulation in the automobile insurance industry. J Law Econ 22:55–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jametti M, von Ungern-Sternberg T (2010) Risk selection in natural-disaster insurance. J Inst Theor Econ 166(2):344–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Hadar J (1995) A note on increased probability of loss and the demand for insurance. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 20:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Baptiste E, Santomero A (2000) The design of private reinsurance contracts. J Financ Intermed 9:274–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt I (1989) Choosing between risky prospects: the characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk. Manag Sci 35(1):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien B, Salanié B, Salanié F (1999) Should more risk averse agents exert more effort? Geneva Risk Insur Rev 24:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y (1977) Capital adequacy and the regulation of financial intermediaries. J Bank Financ 1:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y, Kroll Y (1985) Optimal insurance coverage in situations of pure and speculative risk and the risk-free asset. Insur Math Econ 4:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahane Y, Nye DJ (1975) A portfolio approach to the property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 42:579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karni E (1992) Optimal insurance: a nonexpected utility analysis. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 217–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karni E (1995) Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm – discussion. In: Gollier C, Machina M (eds) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 51–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler D (2014) (Re)insurance is not systemic. J Risk Insur 81:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kielholz W, Durrer A (1997) Insurance derivatives and securitization: new hedging perspectives for the US cat insurance market. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 82:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom RE, Romer D, Williams S (1981) Risk aversion with random initial wealth. Econometrica 49:911–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Kim D, Im S, Hardin JW (2009) Evidence of asymmetric information in the automobile insurance market: dichotomous versus multinomial measurement of insurance coverage. J Risk Insur 76(2):343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and the large. Econometrica 58(1):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R (2012) Principles for insurance regulation: an evaluation of current practices and potential reforms. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 37:175–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Wang S (2009) Catastrophe risk financing in the United States and the European Union: a comparative analysis of alternative regulatory approaches. J Risk Insur 76:607–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Phillips R, Shiu W (2002) The capital structure of firms subject to price regulation: evidence from the insurance industry. J Financ Serv Res 21:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klick J, Stratmann T (2007) Diabetes treatment and moral hazard. J Law Econ 50:519–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpes P (2022) Consolidation and efficiency in the major European insurance markets. Working paper, Accounting Research Group, Aalborg University Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad K, Skaperdas S (1993) Self-insurance and self-protection: a non-expected utility analysis. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 18:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus A, Ross SA (1982) The determinants of fair profits for the property-liability insurance firm. J Financ 37:1015–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12:171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H (2018) All-hazards homeowners insurance: challenges and opportunities. Risk Manag Insur Rev 21(1):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Michel-Kerjan E (2009) At war with the weather. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (1985) Market equilibrium with private knowledge: an insurance example. J Public Econ 26:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (2004) Neglecting disaster: why don’t people insure against large losses? J Risk Uncertain 28:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H, Pauly M (2006) Rules rather than discretion: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. J Risk Uncertain 33:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert R (1983) Long-term contracts and moral hazard. Bell J Econ 14:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm-Tennant J, Weiss M (1997) International insurance cycles: rational expectations/institutional intervention. J Risk Insur 64:415–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger M, Meilijson I (1996) Extraction of surplus under adverse selection: the case of insurance markets. J Econ Theory 69:234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (1998) Risk aversion and self-insurance-cum-protection. J Risk Uncertain 17(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K (2012) Background risk and self-protection. Econ Lett 114:262–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JP, Yu MT (2002) Pricing default-risky cat bonds with moral hazard and basis risk. J Risk Insur 69:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Hofmann D (2010) Lessons learned from the financial crisis for risk management: contrasting developments in insurance and banking. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 35:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire J (1990) Borch’s theorem: a historical survey of applications. In: Loubergé H (ed) Risk, information and insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng CC, Meier U (2006) Analysis of multinational underwriting cycles in property-liability insurance. J Risk Financ 7:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CM, Murdock KC (1996) The role of government contracts in discretionary reinsurance markets for natural disasters. J Risk Insur 63:567–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J (2011) The demand for a risky asset in the presence of a background risk. J Econ Theory 146:372–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg A, Hoyt R (2025) Enterprise risk management. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Cox S (2005) Securitization of mortality risks in life annuities. J Risk Insur 72:227–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzenberger R, Beaglehole D, Reynold C (1996) Assessing catastrophe reinsurance-linked securities as a new asset class. J Portf Manag 23:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H (1983) A portfolio model of international reinsurance operations. J Risk Insur 50:44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H, Watt R (2008) Insuring a risky investment project. Insur Math Econ 42:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loubergé H, Kellezi E, Gilli M (1999) Using catastrophe-linked securities to diversify insurance risk: a financial analysis of cat bonds. J Insur Issues 22:125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1982) Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50:277–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina M (1995) Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm. In: Gollier C, Machina M (eds) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 9–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacMinn RD, Ren Y (2011) Mutual versus stock insurers: a synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research. J Insur 34(2):101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMinn RD, Witt RC (1987) A financial theory of the insurance firm under uncertainty and regulatory constraints. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 12:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee S, Schilling C, Sheedy E (2019) Risk governance in the insurance sector – determinants and consequences in an international sample. J Risk Insur 86(2):381–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan S (1995) Catastrophe insurance system in France. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 77:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahul O (2000) Optimal insurance design with random initial wealth. Econ Lett 69:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main B (1982) Business insurance and large, widely-held corporations. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 7:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makki S, Somwaru A (2001) Evidence of adverse selection in crop insurance markets. J Risk Insur 68:685–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM (1974) Insurance theory: reserves versus mutuality. Econ Inq 12:476–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM (1976) Moral hazard. Am Econ Rev 66:880–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1981) Contractual provisions, organizational structure, and conflict control in insurance markets. J Bus 54:407–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1982) On the corporate demand for insurance. J Bus 55:281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1983) The interdependence of individual portfolio decisions and the demand for insurance. J Polit Econ 91:304–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1986) Ownership structure and control: the mutualization of stock life insurance companies. J Financ Econ 16:73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1988) Ownership structure across lines of property-casualty insurance. J Law Econ 31:351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (1990) On the corporate demand for insurance: evidence from the reinsurance market. J Bus 63:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers D, Smith CW (2002) Ownership structure and control: property-casualty insurer conversion to stock charter. J Financ Serv Res 21:117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier U, Outreville JF (2006) Business cycles in insurance and reinsurance: the case of France, Germany and Switzerland. J Risk Financ 7:160–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegatti M (2009) Optimal prevention and prudence in a two-period model. Math Soc Sci 58(3):393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulbroek L (2002) Integrated risk management for the firm: a senior manager’s guide. J Appl Corp Financ 14:56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (1992) Beneficial changes in random variables under multiple sources of risk and their comparative statics. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 17:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D, Meyer J (1998) Changes in background risk and the demand for insurance. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 23:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D, Meyer J (2004) A more reasonable model of insurance demand. In: Aliprantis CD et al (eds) Assets, beliefs and equilibria in economic dynamics – essays in honor of Mordecai Kurz. Springer, pp 733–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Ormiston MB (1995) Demand for insurance in a portfolio setting. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 20:203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel-Kerjan E (2012) How resilient is your country? Nature 491:497. https://www.nature.com/news/how-resilient-is-your-country-1.11861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel-Kerjan E, Morlaye F (2008) Extreme events, global warming, and insurance-linked securities: how to trigger the “tipping point”. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 33:153–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills E (2009) A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change. Geneva Pap 34:323–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimra W, Wambach A (2019) Contract withdrawals and equilibrium in competitive markets with adverse selection. Economic Theory 67:875–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki H (1977) The rat race and internal labor markets. Bell J Econ 8:394–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffet D (1977) Optimal deductible and consumption theory. J Risk Insur 44:669–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffet D (1979) The risk-sharing problem. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 4:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monti A (2011) Public-private initiative to cover extreme events. In: Courbage C, Stahel WR (eds) Extreme events and insurance: 2011 annus horribilis. The Geneva reports – risk and insurance research. Geneva Association, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D, Png I (1989) Optimal auditing, insurance and redistribution. Q J Econ 104:205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mormino CA (1979) Insurance cycles: an Italian experience. Études et Dossiers de l’Association de Genève 33:37–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch P, Smallwood DE (1980) Solvency regulation in the property-liability insurance industry: empirical evidence. Bell J Econ 11:261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munich Re (2019) Risk report. https://www.munichre.com/content/dam/munichre/mrwebsiteslaunches/2019-annu al-report/MunichRe-Group-AR-2019-en_Risk-Report.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original./MunichRe-Group-AR- 2019-en_Risk-Report.pdf

  • Myers SC, Cohn RA (1987) Insurance rate regulation and the capital asset pricing model. In: Cummins JD, Harrington SE (eds) Fair rate of return in property-liability insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell M, Richter A (2004) Improving risk allocation through indexed cat bonds. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 29:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JA, Sandmann K (1996) Uniqueness of the fair premium for equity-linked life insurance contracts. In: Loubergé H, Subrahmanyam M (eds) Financial risk and derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 65–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Catastrophic risk and insurance. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olivella P, Vera-Hernández M (2013) Testing for asymmetric information in private health insurance. Econ J 123(567):96–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra A, Winter RA (2025) Optimal insurance contracts under moral hazard. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M (1974) Overinsurance and public provision of insurance: the role of moral hazard and adverse selection. Q J Econ 88:44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly M, Kleindorfer PR, Kunreuther H (1986) Regulation and quality competition in the US insurance industry. In: Finsinger J, Pauly M (eds) The economics of insurance regulation. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp 65–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perrakis S, Boloorrforoosh A (2018) Catastrophe futures and reinsurance contracts. J Futur Mark 38(1):104–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2017) Optimal self-protection in two periods: on the role of endogenous saving. J Econ Behav Organ 137:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2021a) Who should exert more effort? Risk aversion, downside risk aversion and optimal prevention. Economic Theory 71(4):1259–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2021b) Prevention as a Giffen good. Econ Lett 208:110052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2022) When is safety a normal good? Working paper, University of Iowa. Available at SSRN 44147815

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2024) The economics of self-protection: a tribute to EGRIE. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 49:6–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter R (2025) The self-selection problem. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard P (1996) Auditing claims in insurance markets with fraud: the credibility issue. J Public Econ 63:27–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard P (2025) Economic analysis of insurance fraud. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 3rd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantin G (2006) Does reinsurance need reinsurers? J Risk Insur 73:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polemarchakis H (1990) Competitive allocation when the asset market is incomplete. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 15:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell LS, Sommer DW (2007) Internal versus external markets in the insurance industry: the role of reinsurance. J Financ Serv Res 31:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest GL (1996) The government, the market and the problem of catastrophic losses. J Risk Uncertain 12:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puelz R, Snow A (1994) Evidence on adverse selection: equilibrium signalling and cross-subsidization in the insurance market. J Polit Econ 102:236–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin JC (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J Econ Behav Organ 3:323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner R (1981) Monitoring cooperative agreements in a repeated principal-agent relationship. Econometrica 49:1127–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raviv A (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. Am Econ Rev 69:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin A (1976) Rational insurance purchasing. J Financ 31:133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea SA (1992) Insurance classifications and social welfare. In: Dionne G (ed) Contributions to insurance economics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 377–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rees R, Gravelle H, Wambach A (1999) Regulation of insurance markets. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 24:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey B (2003) A note on optimal insurance in the presence of a nonpecuniary background risk. Theor Decis 54:73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richaudeau D (1999) Automobile insurance contracts and risk of accident: an empirical test using French individual data. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 24:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley JG (1979) Informational equilibrium. Econometrica 47:331–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C, Zheng B (2010) Moral hazard, insurance claims and repeated insurance contracts. Can J Econ 43:967–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet JC, Villeneuve S (2011) Liquidity management and corporate demand for hedging and insurance. J Financ Intermed 20:303–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1981) Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and in the large with applications. Econometrica 49:621–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild C (2011) The efficiency of categorical discrimination in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 78:267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild C (2024) Welfare analysis in insurance markets with adverse selection. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 49:36–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I – A definition. J Econ Theory 2:225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: the economics of markets with imperfect information. Q J Econ 90:629–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1997) Competition and insurance twenty years later. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 22:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell D, Connelly L (2012) A history of the term “moral hazard”. J Risk Insur 79:1051–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A, Yaari ME (1983) Repeated insurance contracts and moral hazard. J Econ Theory 30:74–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito K (2006) Testing for asymmetric information in the automobile insurance market under rate regulation. J Risk Insur 73:335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandroni A, Squintani F (2007) Overconfidence, insurance and paternalism. Am Econ Rev 97:1994–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlee E (1995) The comparative statics of deductible insurance in expected- and non-expected utility theories. In: Gollier C, Machina M (eds) Non-expected utility and risk management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 57–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1984) Optimal insurance for irreplaceable commodities. J Risk Insur 51:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1997) Insurance demand without the expected utility paradigm. J Risk Insur 64:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (1999) Decomposing catastrophic risk. Insur Math Econ 24:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H (2013) The theory of insurance demand. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn. Springer, pp 167–184

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger H, Doherty N (1985) Incomplete markets for insurance: an overview. J Risk Insur 52:402–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal U, Spivak A (1990) First order versus second order risk aversion. J Econ Theory 51:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1979) On moral hazard and insurance. Q J Econ 93:541–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1982) On liability and insurance. Bell J Econ 13:120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1986) The judgment proof problem. Int Rev Law Econ 6:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2000) On the social function and the regulation of liability insurance. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 25:166–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2018) Liability for accidents in the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave MacMillan, Springer, London, pp 7797–7803

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shim J (2011) Mergers & acquisitions, diversification and performance in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. J Financ Serv Res 39:119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiu YM (2011) Reinsurance and capital structure: evidence from the United Kingdom non-life insurance industry. J Risk Insur 78:475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (1982) Kinked utility and the demand for human wealth and liability insurance. Eur Econ Rev 17:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart M (2000) Competitive insurance markets with two unobservables. Int Econ Rev 41:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Stulz R (1985) The determinants of firms’ hedging policies. J Financ Quant Anal 20:391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Smithson W, Wilford DS (1990) Financial engineering: why hedge? In: Handbook of financial engineering. Harper & Row, pp 126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1978) Product differentiation and performance in insurance markets. J Public Econ 10:427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopoly, non-linear pricing and imperfect information: the insurance market. Rev Econ Stud 44:407–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1983) Risk, incentives and insurance: the pure theory of moral hazard. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 8:4–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71:393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulz RM (1984) Optimal hedging policies. J Financ Quant Anal 19:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz RM (1996) Rethinking risk management. J Appl Corp Financ 9(3):8–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney GH, Beard R (1992) The comparative statics of self-protection. J Risk Insur 59(2):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Re (2009) The role of indices in transferring insurance risks to capital markets. Sigma 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibiletti L (1995) Beneficial changes in random variables via copulas: an application to insurance. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 20:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend R (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive contracts with costly state verification. J Econ Theory 22:265–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2005) Risky choices and correlated background risk. Manag Sci 51:1336–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufano P (1996) Who manages risk? An empirical examination of risk management practices in the gold mining industry. J Financ 51:1097–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull S (1983) Additional aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J Bus 56:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezian E (1985) Ratemaking methods and profit cycles in property and liability insurance. J Risk Insur 52:477–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve B (2003) Concurrence et antisélection multidimensionnelle en assurance. Ann Econ Stat 69:119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK (1995) Insurance and catastrophes: the changing role of the liability system. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 20:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Schulenburg M (1986) Optimal insurance purchasing in the presence of compulsory insurance and insurable risks. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 38:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Li J (2015) Precautionary effort: another trait for prudence. J Risk Insur 82(4):977–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M (2007) Underwriting cycles: a synthesis and further directions. J Insur Issues 30(1):31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton Risk Management Center (2007) Managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophe. Wharton School, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C (1977) A model of insurance markets with incomplete information. J Econ Theory 12:167–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter RA (1994) The dynamics of competitive insurance markets. J Financ Intermed 3:379–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari M (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:95–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young VR, Browne MJ (1997) Explaining insurance policy provisions via adverse selection. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 22:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanjani G (2002) Pricing and capital allocation in catastrophe insurance. J Financ Econ 65:283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser R (1995) Insurance and catastrophes. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 20:157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou H, Adams M (2008) Debt capacity, cost of debt, and corporate insurance. J Financ Quant Anal 43:433–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel P, Ghermi P (1990) Exclusive vs. independent agencies: a comparison of performance. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 15:171–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Loubergé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loubergé, H., Dionne, G. (2025). Developments in Risk and Insurance Economics: The Past 50 Years. In: Dionne, G. (eds) Handbook of Insurance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69561-2_1

Download citation

Keywords

JEL Classification

Publish with us

Policies and ethics