Welcome to /his/ - History & Humanities: This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged. For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/. /his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character. When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.

Who is more evil; the gestapo or modern day cops?

Pictured: Chinkspammer detained by local irl jannies (colorized)

I'm currently reading The Oxford History of the World (good, but I preferred The Penguin History of the World) and am going to read left next. My q is this: is A People's History of the World communist slop or something a bit more enlightened?

An underground railroad stop was discovered in a NYC house. I wonder how many more undiscovered underground railroad stops are around.

Why are Jews so hardcore into Nordicism and Nietzsche?

Why do we hear so much about dead cosmonauts(even fake stories) and yet people barely make note of dead astronauts?

Redpill me on Baal? Has its worship continued to this day?

are the Shia crypto-Christians?

Health of Adolf Hitler: How many medical issues did he have? Was the science of the times enough to address most of his particular problems? How much of it all was just quackery?

Prometheus is Satan, Zeus is Yahweh. Take that as you will.

Leo Frank: Do you believe that Leo Frank killed Mary Phagan? Why/Why not?

As we all know, the US is under Zionist occupation. What other countries in history have been captured by elites from a distant smaller country and used to serve that distant small country?

After being expelled from the Whigs and ending up a president without a party, John Tyler met with Andrew Jackson at the Hermitage in early 1844. The 77 year old former president, still considered the titular head of the Democrat Party, begged Tyler not to run in this election. Tyler accepted if the Democrats ran someone who would carry out his plans for expansion in the West. Jackson agreed to this proposal. That candidate ended up being Jackson's neighbor, Tennessee governor and former Congressman James Polk. Domestic issues such as tariffs and centralized banking were shelved for the time being and the Democrat platform focused primarily on expansion of US territory to the Pacific. Northern Democrats, led by former president Van Buren, opposed Texas annexation as a Southern plot to add more slave states. Andrew Jackson meanwhile made public his support for taking Texas, which he had refused to do while president, and declared that it had to be done soon before Britain or France set their sights on the place. Henry Clay, now nearly 70, made one more go for president as the Whig candidate. Despite being a slaveowner, Clay firmly opposed Texas annexation but Whig leaders preferred to sidestep that issue for fear of alienating Southerners. As such, Clay's platform dodged the Texas question and focused instead on bread-and-butter economic issues.

Canadian History: Reminder that this really happened

What a chud.

Why won't they dna test this guy Are we sure he's saint mark

Were lynchings of gay males a thing in the south as depicted in this movie? Traditional lynching historiography is focused on race, but sexuality is little discussed. What we do we know about lynching of gay men(sources, etc.), and how frequently did it happen? Or is it made up?

How do the Israel and Jew loving protestants reconcile their beliefs with Luther's views?

Was antisemitism created by the Rothschilds to blame ordinary Jewish people for what international British banksters do?

Did the Kingdom of Asturias still count as Visigothic? Would they be considered heirs?

Ultimate Fate of Capitalism: What is the capitalist paradise like? What happens if all land is exploited without limit, market regulates itself without limit, companies can't outcompete each other and just reach equilibrium?

>"Oh, so THATS why Franco imported Moroccans to win the civil war for him"

Why did the prussians like skulls so much?

>Americans think they defeated Spain in the Mexican American war and don't know that Louisiana and Florida were bought, the former from the French. Why are they so illiterate about even the most basic elements of their history?

How does non-ritual cannibalism become commonplace in a society? How is it not immediately rejected as abhorrent?

Haplogroups go back a few generations not thousands of years like pol claims. Everyone on his is retarded and all of your haplgroup spam is wrong and you're tards.

>LMAO NOT ME THINKING SKSKSKSKSKSKSK

XIX century: Spain Century of Humiliation: Spain was far behind the rest of Europe in 1900 because: >Most of their country was annihilated during the Napoleonic invasion >They lost most of their empire/colonies >Three civil wars >War against the USA >Missed most of the industrial revolution >Political instability >Etc. XIX Spain was pure chaos

Why are Nazis so gay

His face, is Angelic. So much more perfect then greek or roman statues. He was touched by God

Pretty good emperor, this Maurice guy.

Why is this so controversial to point out: Are we not supposed to be proud of ourselves? Are we not minorities in reality?

What country has the most extensively glorious history, and why is it Spain?: >Home to many diverse tribes from Celtiberians, Vascones, Iberians, Tartessians, Carthegenians >Home to some of the greatest Roman emperors (Trajan, Hadrian) >Visigothic kingdom helped formed the beginning of Spanish identity >Al-Andalus ruled by the Moors made Iberia a beacon of light, forming many scientists, artists, philosophers >Reconquista showed that you can defeat Islam >The Spanish Inquisition was one of the earliest declarations of fair trials and due process, at a time when Germans were still killing women en masse for witchcraft >Discover an entire-ass half of the world, spread your language, culture, and religion there >Actually invest and mixed with the locals, treating them well unlike the Anglos who just segregated and exterminated them >The first world power for 300 years, their currency was the default >Spanish Golden Age with glorious Gothic, Renaissance, and Baroque aesthetic >Was so powerful in Europe that it made others seethe and spread black legend propaganda that people still believe to this day >Franco was a glorious leader who prevented Spain's involvement in WW2 and stopped communist takeover >Nowadays the most respected and visited country worldwide without the need of marketing unlike France or Japan, also very progressive feminist and LGBT policies and practices

The hussites: How did they manage to repel 5 crusades?

From where does the bull symbolism for cuckolding originate? Nowadays bull just means the guy who cucks the guy, but it seems older meaning is putting bull horns on you means you are a cuck. So where does it come from and what does it mean?

Why do Spanish people claim they had "American" colonies, "American" silver, and that they helped Christianize "America"? The only thing they did as far as American history is concerned is to found a few settlements in the Southwest (Los Angeles, San Antonio, Santa Fe) and also help American Revolutionary forces fight against the British Empire, even though Galvez's contribution to the Revolutionary War was nowhere near as big as Lafayette's? Also, they had nothing to do with REAL American culture, like the 2nd Amendment, rap music, American-style cars (not pussy-ass Eurofag toycars), and American-style Christianity (as opposed to Mediterranean/Hispanic Popery). McDonald ain't a Hispanic surname, and neither are Morse, Edison, Westinghouse, Shannon, Nixon, Clinton, Bush, or Epstein.

how did historicaly dictators try to reeducate the populance to their new vision after violently killing off the previous elites?

Did european genetics drive israel to grow faster than all it's neighbors? Like how the US grew quicker than mexico

Why the hell do Europeans pay the GROOM to marry their daughter, that is dowry, and not the opposite, bridewealth? Bridewealth has reason, the groom pays the parents several years of wages for compensation for raising the bride. Dowry sounds like cuckoldry. Apparently bride price used to also be standard until the medieval age in most of Europe, and it was invented by ancient Greeks. India/Pakistan/Latinx America also used to be bride price societies until colonisation

Why does modern society feel souless literaly obssesed with metro sexual faggots in a way never seen before

Historically speaking: Is the conflict between Aryans and Jews is because their Divine bloodlines? Those their physiognomy represents the one of their Divine Ancestors?

Historically, why has Britain been so ahead of other parts of the world when it comes to contributions to science?

Why do people act like the inclusion or exclusion of this book in the canon would've made that big of a difference? The Ethiopian Orthodox Church accepts it and their liturgy and doctrines are almost the same as Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. Is it really some dangerous book that needed to be censored?

How are Northern New English states (NH, VT, Maine) so wealthy in state by state rankings? They haven't really had industry since 1920s, barely have high productivity services or big companies? What is the historical basis on their relatively well off status?

Adolf (((Shekelgruber)))

>Be Scandinigger >Be the shithole of europe for centuries >High point of your history is plundering a few monasteries and then getting btfo whenever you faced non civilians >only other achievement is Sweden becoming a regional power for a short while before getting humbled by Spain and Russia >Become such a joke of a country that a random swarthy French commoner without a drop of blue blood from the deep south of France become your king >Find oil, finally attain prosperity >Waste it all on becoming Northern Somalia >Tfw now you're in competition with Britain over who top the EU statistics in most rape per inhabitants >Even your diaspora in the US in Minnesota welcome infinity of Somalians VVVVVGH... so that's the master race I've heard so much about...

We can disagree on who God is: But no sensible person would deny his existence. If you look at how articulated the world is, you'd find everything is perfectly arranged. The sun and moon, genitalia, fruits and vegetables, speech, sight, teeth, bones, death, maturity, - you cannot accept these as a cosmic glitch's coincidence. > but muh disabled and sick people/animals God is showing signs he's capable of agony all the while testing if your faith is strong or not. Besides, he'll compensate them for it. > but muh multitudes of religions How many of them are actually sensible/being practiced today? Use your mind and you'll find your answer.

I think it's strategically bad for a country to have access to multiple oceans, especially if it's not an island or rump nation that can easily get around. You are permanently forced to split your navy and essentially you have to pay for everything twice

Iran - Iraq war: name a more pointless war >neither side could be allowed to lose because the major powers didn’t want Iraq to control so much oil, nor for Iran to become such a dominant Middle Eastern state >both sides end up funded and armed as a result to prevent the other side winning >whenever one side appears to be doing well, the other side gets more aid >only time you could see WW1 style trench warfare with modern weapons and equipment like tanks, jets, even chemical weapons and shit. Until Ukraine

>the reason why the geneva convention was written

Proto-Indo-European sun: Hey, did you know that for the beloved "Aryans" of the past, the sun wasn't even a god? The sun, both as a noun and as a mythological element, varies greatly across all branches in the reconstruction of a single solar deity. And judging by the myths, it was feminine hahaha yes, Romans copied from the Greeks so they don't count and the Greeks have oriental influence kek All these gay solar memes, all for a feminine symbol, for them the sun was a woman. If you want to know what the "Gigachad Aryan solar religion" was like, see what the oldest Indo-Europeans represented. Related photo: a fat woman who looks like a lesb from California Kek kek Indo-European lost, again.

Gualtieri and the invasion of Falklands: Kind of reminds me of Saddams invasion of Kuwait. Why did he misjudge things so badly? The British had been in negotiations to try and transfer the islands to Argentina for YEARS. They were seen as an expensive relic. The biggest obstacle was the population of the Falklands seeing themselves as British and not wanting to suddenly be in a country run by foreigners who were also a military dictatorship (reasonable) Gualtieri makes the calculation that because Thatcher and previous British governments had been winding down naval and military investments and pulled back their regular patrols and such around the island this meant they… wouldn’t care if it was invaded? What? I just don’t understand this mindset. I know in his mind he thought Argentina could occupy the Falklands then negotiate their transfer from a position of strength, with Argentinean ownership seen as a Fait Accompli. But surely any leader would understand that countries getting their territory invaded do not tend to just sigh and peace out, they get angry. I also don’t understand why he thought the US would value their relationship with the argentinean Junta’s government over the UK’s government, yes the Cold War was on and America was concerned with preventing communism in South America, but they also had fucking nukes and bombers stationed in Britain courtesy of the British government, along with them being a key member of NATO. why on earth would they ever want to piss off the British public when they’re in such a vital strategic position?

Are humans soulless automatons?

don't read what happend to sudeten germans in 1945

I feel like crushing the people that wronged me under 50 tonnes of steel and then pissing on their mangled body would solve 99% of problems.

Trans sisters… I kneel…

more Indo-European substrates in languages of the Middle East?: 1/? The possibility of an Indo-European substrate in the Hurro-Urartian languages has already been discussed by other authors, such as Arnaud Fournet & Allan R. Bomhard, and another author is Armen Petrosyan, who, although somewhat controversial in certain statements, posits interesting things. focusing on comparative mythology, perhaps, just perhaps, we may be dealing with Indo-European gods within the pantheons of Eastern cultures, in this case, the Urartians This article in question: https://www.academia.edu/116989528/Biainili_the_earliest_people_in_the_east_of_Van_lake Apparently, the name of the Urartian god Shiyin was borrowed from Hittite, and the Urartian capital Tušpa was the center of worship for this god. Furthermore, the author compares the name Shiyin to that of the Armenian province of Siwnik, where there are supposedly traces of an ancient sun god cult. I wonder how many other Indo-European substrata exist in the East?

Conlang "Therizino": I have created an a posteriori artificial language called "Therizino." One theory is that these artificial languages could function as a kind of slang, and could potentially be used to resist the oppression of free speech. ■ Word Order - English-style SVO (Subject-Verb-Object) is used. ■ Sound Change Rules A. Consonant Change 1. t l / r / z (softening in the middle of the word) 2. th s 3. ph f 4. c/k h (except at the beginning of the word) 5. v f (except at the beginning of the word) 6. b z (in the middle of the word, between vowels) B. Vowel and Ending Changes 6. -tion / -sion -lion 7. -ty -irty / -ia 8. -ity -ilia / -iati 9. Diphthongization (mainly a and o) 10. Word endings tend to end with vowels. ■ Created Vocabulary [Abstract Concepts] nation nalion liberty lezirty freedom frelom justice jaselis peace pisa truth trusa power paura unity unilia culture kulira history hisori knowledge nolage society soliati [Nature/Materials] water valer fire fira earth erla sky skai star stara sun suna moon mona wind wina stone stona tree tria ■ Language Characteristics - An a posteriori language inspired by English, Latin, and Greek - Soft sounds with many vowels - Word endings tend to end with bright vowels - English-style grammar, easy to use - Sound change rules maintain a consistent vocabulary I probably won't be working on this language any further (lol) This artificial language is still incomplete. There are still issues to be addressed, such as verb conjugation (present, past, future) and plural nouns. I hope someone discovers this language and perfects it.

Is the god emperor of mankind really a god?

Okay, but why shouldnt someone like this if presented with the opportunity subvert society to make it hell for Good looking people?

I read a bit about the so called party switch and discovered it's more complicated than most think. Both american parties had conservative and liberal factions historically. Democrat presidents like woodrow wilson favored open border immigration while democrat presidents like james polk supported imperialistic expansion(opposed by large parts of the country). Republican presidents like calvin coolidge wanted to ban all immigration, while other repulican presidents like ulysseus s grant wanted to give citizenship to Indians. The only issue both parties strongly disagreed on was slavery from 1850 onwards, and this was mostly a regional division. Only in the 1960s conservatives rushed to the GOP and liberals to the democrats cementing the ideological divide. Why was american party division not precise like the labour-tory dichotomy in the UK which has remained the same since party origins?

>villains whose motives are hard to find fault in and are arguably better than the hero's

No blond police exist.

A Question for Catholics: First of all, I want to make it clear that this is not a spam thread like those lunatic Indians do every day with pre-prepared and recycled speeches from 2008. It's a genuine question from a guy who simply has a doubt. Catholicism greatly values human multiplication through marriage, and naturally this has spiritual importance in the lives of the faithful. But then I discovered that there is a consecration called "Ordo Virginum" where women take a vow to obviously not break their virginity and remain single..Also I found the codename "Wife of Christ" bizarre. I found it disrespectful. And then I thought: wouldn't that be counterintuitive? Especially when it's clear that the salvation of women comes from men and motherhood saves women? For example, if many, many women choose this, wouldn't it be a problem? Clearly it's different from living in a convent. I'm not talking about that. Thank you for reading.

KWAB

Once the initial bloodshed of Eurasian goyim was mostly done, it became clear communism and the Soviet Union were unsustainable. Once this happened, the Elders of Zion realised the capitalist faction of jews were far more successful so they moved to the USA and fully backed Liberal Democracy as the primary means of taking over the world. Communism is a failure and Liberal Democracy is a tool to undermine the White race - which is the sole reason the USA was founded.

I like when people try to legitimately call the HRE "Roman". Lets you know theyre completely historically illiterate and probably some retarded tradcath, so you immediately know they have nothing of value to say

If he lived 5 more years he would have saved the USSR

What the fuck is his problem?

The 1879 Murder of Luman Smith: >It is 1874. Joseph B. Wood's daughter, Alma, a short, slight woman in her late twenties, marries Luman Smith, a farmer in Williston, Vermont. It is Alma's second marriage. To it, she brings Joseph, a child from her previous marriage who is named after his grandfather. Luman, 40, and Alma have two children together. Luman is devoted to the children. >Luman and Alma's relationship is not good, however, and they fight often. Alma leaves the home several times between 1874 and 1879. Tensions in the household are heightened by Alma's infidelity and prostitution, and by Luman's threats and occasional violence toward Alma. In 1879, Alma again leaves Luman, the farm, and the three children. >Luman soon realizes that he cannot run a farm and raise the three children by himself. The infant, in particular, requires constant attention. He goes to his estranged wife and begs her to return. She agrees, but only after he accepts three conditions. First, she is to be given her own room in the house where she can entertain guests without interruption from Luman. Second, her father is to move in with them. This arrangement helps her father and provides her with some degree of protection, if needed, as does the small revolver she has recently purchased. Finally, Luman signs most of his property over to her and agrees to allow her to use his horse when he is not using it. >After the deal is made and the property transferred, Alma nonetheless begins to plan to move west to Lincoln, Nebraska. Luman carries a good-sized dirk (a short, straight dagger) with him throughout the day. Fearing that Luman might use it against her, Alma steals the knife and hides it.

Now that the right wing has revealed itself as "let's kill non-Nords" and the left wing has revealed itself as "let's take Europeans' stuff and give it to browns", what's next for South Euros and East Euros? They're totally unequipped to deal with the post-Cold War political realignment. They're too white for the brown worship party and too swarthy for the Germanic worship party. Nobody can really "place" them anywhere. Should they form a third bloc?

Tactical appraisal of the Soviet 40th Army in Afghanistan?

>so yeah, we just carpet bombed all of Europe >and we’ll only give you humanitarian aid if you become our vassal states >and if you don’t well rig your elections and pay right wing death squads to kill you >oh, btw, you also need to join our military pact and be cannon fodder against the USSR even though no Eastern European state currently is threatening us and the USSR wants to join our alliance anyway But….I thought NATO was supposed to be the muh freedom n democracy side of the Cold War?

Why did libertarianism become so popular in America?

Do you believe jews are the master race? That all their lore/prophecies are true, that they're God's Chosen, and that their victory is inevitable?

Psalm 1: The Way of the Righteous and the Wicked Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of YHWH, and on His law he meditates day and night. He is like a tree planted by streams of water that yields its fruit in its season, and its leaf does not wither. In all that he does, he prospers. The wicked are not so, but are like chaff that the wind drives away. Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous; for YHWH knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will perish.

Misconceptions about emperor Julian I should clear up.: >Julian’s ideas weren’t new or controversial among contemporary pagans as he was a Neoplatonist, which was already the standard view amongst educated pagans in the Roman Empire. He wasn’t some “distant academic” either as he was patron of public rituals and festivals which were still popular amongst pagans. >Despite popular misconception, Julian wasn’t trying to create a new “pagan church.” What he actually was trying to do was unify the already-existing pagan religions under a core Neoplatonic framework; the rituals, priesthoods, and whatnot would remain the same as they always had been, the only difference being that they all would come to see they were different shades of the truth rather than standing on their own. None of these are new ideas either as Platonists have always held this view towards the divine and Interpretatio graeca had already been a thing since the BC era. The only thing Julian actually did borrow from Christianity was charity and support for the poor since he argued that charity was the only reason why Christianity ever became widespread. >The only thing that was weird was Julian’s insistence on animal sacrifice which had already declined long before the rise of Christianity. He was reportedly upset by the fact that active pagan cults were no longer widely practicing it and was so obsessed with animal sacrifice that even other pagans sympathetic to him made fun of this and often joked that the empire would eventually run out of cattle. I should also clarify that although Julian did try to establish a unified hierarchy to supervise local city-cults, this isn’t the same thing as establishing a new “church” since all he really did was restore patronage to the imperial cult and tried uniting other priesthoods with it (which again, would all be theologically unified under a core Neoplatonic framework).

First humans: I hate how people usually think the proto africans that left the continent to become the other races had the appearance of Congoids like Vinicius jr, but they actually looked more like this. Also, First Humans thread. Discuss.

Are jews considered a primarily subterranean species/society? Are there any other examples of hominids who lived like they do?

If the average Allied soldier, of both World Wars, knew they were fighting for jewish-run Central Banks and that their home states were going to be overrun by browns in the name of the Kalergi Plan within a hundred years of their first birthday, would they still fight? Personally, I think yes. Western goycattle are too enslaved by jewry to change their ways even in the face of evidence. Just look outside, or this every board, to see proof doesn't change people's minds. Being a Fatalist and a Darwinist myself, I say White Genocide, if not stopped, is justified. The only thing to have ever kept the White race back was ourselves. It all started with the adoption of Christcuckianity and now here we are. Only time will tell if the spell will be dispersed, or we will continue shunning racism during the worldwide continuation of the Haitian Revolution. Oh well, as long as we got our jewish Hollywood films portraying us as wholesome egalitarian Chads, it doesn't matter what the long-term consequences may be.

Is this stuff real historically and humanity speaking

>read Norse Saga >Expect Greek tragedy >It's literally just a power fantasy isekai of a nameless bum getting a powerful sword and a Valkyrie mentor falling in love with him

The users of his are slowly disappearing, some from meth, some from actual irl fail.

I used to think Medchad vs Nordicuck was nothing more than a meme made by seething Latinos and Indians self-inserting themselves and seeing history too much in black-and-white, but I now kind of unironically agree with them. I used to think it's just Ancient Greco-Roman nostalgia comparing civilized Meds vs savage barbarians, but that is only part of the picture. Mediterraneans legitimately had a more prosperous and morally superior civilization for so long, and it still technically lingers to this day. Even during the dark ages caused by those raging barbarians who destroyed Rome, the Mediterranean was still the most prosperous civilization. Constantinople peaked briefly, Rome was still the capital of Christendom, and Iberia was liberated by the African Moors from the corrupt Gothic barbarian rulers to become the richest kingdom. Then the Italian Renaissance and Age of Exploration happened. And unlike the French, English, or Dutch colonizers who pillaged, raped, and killed the locals in such barbaric matters wherever they went, the Spanish and Portuguese liberated the locals from tyrants, spreading their culture and mixing with them. There is a reason why Spain, Portugal, and Italy gets a pass from anti-colonial discourses. Then there comes human rights. While the Germans, French, and Anglos killed women en masse under false suspicion of witchcraft, the Spanish and Portuguese allowed women to be writers, leaders, and fighters along with their male peers. The Spanish Inquisition had some of the fairest due process and fair treatment for its time whereas in England you'd have your hands chopped off for something like stealing, not to mention the Law of Burgos and the Valladoid debates. In the North we have ideologies like communism and racism that still plagues the world to this day.

is the claim by the establishment that "Diversity Built Britain" historically accurate?

I think the Voynich manuscript is written in African Romance, in some form of bastardized Latin alphabet that evolved isolatedly among minorities in the Caliphates. Somebody might have still been able to speak it and write it in the 15th century or late 14th century, and decided to write some sort of book in the forementioned language. Or by request from somebody interested in it.

What’s the deal with this place? What went on here?

>remember back when I was a kid and I saw in a book or something this famous photo of a homeless family living out of their ancient beater car in the 80s >the implication they were getting at was that this was obviously Ronald Reagan's fault and in his America millions live like this while a handful of rich people are partying on a yacht somewhere after he gave them tax cuts and cut social services >turns out they were actually completely degenerate junkies and the stepdad was molesting the daughter Figures.

If its of no Benefit to Behave Morally: Why is it considered a moral behavior?

Is God promoting NEETdom here?

>Face of an 18-year-old girl who lived 9,000 years ago in the ancient region of Thessaly. Are scientists just pulling our legs now? This girl looks nothing like a caveman and looks like the cashier at my Dunkin donuts.

For all the bloodshed and cannibalism, they were still more sanitary and technologically advanced than those morally-righteous conquistadores

Why is Yahweh so obsessed with glorifying himself? Isn't that literally the sin of pride? Also why is a being who is allegedly perfect and omniscient so insecure about himself? Something doesn't add up

DAS RITE.

Anon what comes after liberal democracy?

Why do nobody mention that proto germanics killed and cucked PIE/WSH ? They have native paternal lines (I) but a fuck ton of WSH/Steppe

I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours, but I think that God's got a sick sense of humour. And when I die, I expect to find him laughing.

Truth Nuke but it applies to God as well.

How could he win?

I caught one of these jeetberians seething about white slavs and calling them "R1ajeets" on /int/ Why is being R1B so important to them? It means nothing. check murray's map of human accomplishment, only germanic R1B are good.

>wake up >you are the leader of Poland in 1935 What do you do, knowing history? What is even the winning move here?

Why did the christ figure of spanish nationalists and third world hispanistas/radcaths Fly British Airways and fight for First World Anglo Protestant-Judeo Capitalism?

With the US economy still in the doldrums from the lingering effects of the 1837 depression, the Whigs were highly motivated and energized in 1840. The Democrats reluctantly renominated Martin Van Buren for lack of another viable candidate. Trying to out-Jackson Andrew Jackson, the Whigs ran War of 1812 hero William Henry Harrison. The aging general, nearly 70, had gained fame for his victory over the Shawnee Indians at Tippecanoe in 1813 and he was part of the quartet of Whig presidential candidates in 1836. This election saw mass populism used in a way it had never been before, with Whig propaganda characterizing Harrison as a rough-hewn backwoodsman coming from his farm to go to Washington DC and clean out pompous Northeastern aristocrats like Van Buren. This was as misleading as it got. William Henry Harrison was far from a simple farmer; he was a scion of one of Virginia's First Families and born into privilege. He lived in a 20 room mansion in Ohio and not a farmhouse or log cabin. Martin Van Buren for comparison had grown in relative poverty, although over the years he'd made a comfortable living for himself from various well-compensated government posts. The Whig campaign slogan "Tippecanoe and Tyler, too" became iconic as was the falsified claim that Harrison was a "hard cider-drinking" farmer (he was said to prefer whiskey to cider). The Democrats tried in vain to discuss nuts-and-bolts issues like tariffs, internal improvements, and centralized banking but it was hopeless as all their arguments were drowned out in a chorus of hard cider and "Harrison is a backwoods warrior" chants. Harrison carried the day in a major electoral landslide (234 electoral votes against Van Buren's 60) and 52% of the popular vote. His landslide swept through all regions of the country while Van Buren's votes mostly only came from the South and West.

Can a person be class ambiguous?

Can this difference be explained historically & humanitically?

Yahweh, Baal (Lord) of Metallurgy: >God of Abraham >God of Moses (the golden idol was not able to portray his drip and chadness) >God of Jesus >God of Epstein >Patron of the Industrial Revolution and mass-scale production Praise be His Name.

Why is generational punishment seen as evil when North Korea does it but seen as justice when YHWH does it?

Why did Korean houses develop in a way that benefits warm climates when Korea is cold as shit?

Deep down we're all grateful to him for saving the White race from germanic and shitalian orcs

Are native americans actually asians? >similar noses >similar eyes >similar hair Theyre just a little bit darker.

Why did Europeans built monstrosities like this? Was it autism? This looks like something that would exist only in video game, not real life.

Prove him wrong

We're sorry, nazi, but the pedophilic trans pagan orgies will have to stop

why did Americans and bongs need to fight Hitler anyway?: all of his planned conquest was in eastern Europe well away from them and didn't conflict with any of their interests. imagine how many lives would be spared if they just ignore him and let him take over a bunch of irrelevant Slav countries in peace.

Did any jews in the gas chambers feel remorse for what they did, or did they all profess innocence

How do people convince mutilating their own sons is a good thing?

Defending Hitler in court: If u were the defense attorney of Hitler how would u defend him in court? What will ur main arguments be?

Did Islam ever proposed a eschatological reason why Allah elevated the arabic people above all else? >INB4: Islam is a universalistic religion, using arabic dosent meant arabs are superiors This cope quickly collapse once you study Islam a a little more >Arabs being litterally the seed of Abraham, THE pious monoteistic paragon of human virtue before Muhammad, and undisputed protagonist of the Quran >As the firstborn sons of Abraham lost their Chosen People status for their sins (jews), Allan promoted the second sons as the new chosen people >The perfect human being all the humans were ordered to imitate was a 7th Century Arab man >All his companions and the good Caliphs? Arabs >Sacred language? arabic >Holy sites? 2/3 in Arabia >Early non-arabic muslims litterally had to be adopted by an arabic clan to be "accepted" >Entire non-arabic Islamic cultures litterally inviting Arab men in their lands so the could make them their kings (Morocco) From a outside, secular view, its blatanty clear Islam started as a ethnoreligion for arabs-only, and conversion were to be accepted and encouraged only with the Abbasid Revolution, whose bulk of support were iranian converters

The game is over, as I am fond of saying: The jews won. They are in control of the Pikes Peak batholith and the multi-trillion-dollar granite tunnel system — a highly symbolic 40 miles west of Denver, Colorado in the Front Range. But they are in control of much more than the end-time survival apparatus. They control not only the military and government of the United States of America but through the power of major corporations and the corruptibility of businessmen and government officials, fiat currency manipulation by the WiΩards of Fiat Currency at the Federal Reserve System, a small army of propagandists and "hackers" (this is a technically incorrect use of the term) who are fighting to maintain control of the Frankenstein monster they created called the Internet (in a war I fear they are going to lose), and even the Republican form of government they created which inevitably—and I would argue by design—fosters centralized control and assures only a handful of "elected" officials must be compromised to control an entire country, they control the entire Western world.

What was Gordon's problem? Was it autism?

>think God is evil, people tell me to see book of Job >he seems even more evil than before

Historically speaking, Why are peruvian women so beautiful?

He literally saved Western civilization from the rothschild Gaydolf Shitler and hordes of yellow Japs and brown Shitalians

>one of the last great Georgian noble families fled to Poland after the Bolshevik takeover and from there, migrated to midwestern American after the Soviets took over Poland >from there, their son joined the US Army, rose to the rank of general, and was one of the leading commanders against Saddams Iraq in the Gulf War huh, neat. Post other interesting, overlooked, history nuggets like this.

People who hate KJV are Going to Hell: Hating the King James Bible is a sign you are going to hell because the KJV is the most accurate, most inspired by the Holy Spirit version of the Bible. If you hate the KJV it's a sign there is something very spiritually wrong with you. Loving the KJV means you take God's word literally. KJV is God's exact words. The other Bible versions are corrupted and not pure words of God.

Does anyone else find it tragic how the past two centuries basically obliterated any intellectual sovereignty other civilisations used to have? Everyone from Bangalore to Kinshasa to Tokyo grow up with basically the worldview of a late 18th century Anglo.

The secret relationship between blacks and jews: So is this book complete nonsense or is it true that Jews were vastly over represented in the new world slave trade? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Relationship_Between_Blacks_and_Jews It’s hard to differentiate between some uncomfortable facts being condemned, or it being fictional. Or if the book is partly true partly false and the debunkers just throw the baby out with the bath water

Why were the Greeks the only ancient people to discover philosophy? Everyone else never made it past theology

Has puerto rico ever truly been an asset to the US? Or is it in the country because people feel bad for them(they will starve if independent)?

Evolution is real: Christbros lost.

Epstein proves hitler was right on jews. Even if the holo happened it was justified.

>AGGGHHHHH I SACRIFICED COUNTLESS INFANTS AT THE ALTAR TO BA'AL! >AAIIIIYEEEEE I WAS A DEVOTED CHRISTIAN BUT I READ THE NIV INSTEAD OF THE KJV! >THESE ARE SINS WORTHY OF THE SAME EXACT PUNISHMENT, WE BOTH DESERVE TO BE HERE AAAAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

/his/ greatest documentaries: Can we compile a list of the best history documentaries. I'll start with an obvious one: >The Vietnam War by Ken Burns

>oh! some crazy muslims just hijacked the plane! Instead of fighting them, I am just going to stay on my seat like a good boy >surely nothing bad is going to happe-ACK! What the hell was their problem? Cattle mentality?

Prussia fought in three World Wars. >It won the Seven Years' War, the first World War before the World War (defeated all other continental Great Powers) >It won the Eastern Front and liberated Eastern Europe, but were destabilized and only politically defeated, while being militarily intact (starvation, Communist agitation, failing allies lead to a coup by the Socialists) in the Great War >They suddenly reemerged and conquered almost all of Europe in the Second World War and had a decent (but not in their favor) chance at winning the war, while voluntarily playing at maximum difficulty (Ethnic Chauvinism disgruntling allies, Hitler not trusting them to give them independence) and then being completely and utterly defeated with a horrible tragic fate awaiting the Germans Prussia is the epitome of military excellence. Even when they were beaten in battles, they had a positive kill-to-death ratio. Even when they were pushed all the way back to Berlin. Frederick the Great was extremely unlucky to have Russia as an enemy, which makes no rational sense, but he still survived, despite Eastern Prussia being occupied and having his entire treasury raided once. The history of this state is so great, it easily compares to the Human excellence exhibited in Ancient Greece, Rome, European Colonization of the world and other periods.

Imagine this...: You are a 5'4 mexican tradcath who just called Odin a "cum drinking demon" but suddenly from behind you a group of 12th 6'2 Norse crusaders fresh of slaughtering wends, with icy steel blue eyes and bulging muscles appear. These men who are more Catholic then you ever will be ask you what you just said about one of their favorite characters from their Sagas, what happens next?

Founding fathers of America paid Jizya to Muslims and respected Muhammad: George Washington paid Jizya to the Ottoman Islamic caliphate (Regency of Algiers) Algeria militarily defeated the US in the American-Algerian War from 1785–1795 and captured American ships and crew Algeria forced America to pay tribute (jizya) after President George Washington capitulated to the Regency of Algiers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American%E2%80%93Algerian_War https://twitter.com/hse1232/status/1558099362567397376 My son just reminded me that George Washington signed a jizya treaty with the Ottomans in 1784. It was the only time the US has: 1. signed a treaty written in another language 2. paid taxes to another country 3. calculated according to the Islamic calendar, not the Gregorian This was before the more famous Barbary wars fought by presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Wars 1801-1805 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War 1815 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Barbary_War

Why do argentineans seem to believe they own the Falklands? Usually having a corrupt military dictatorship that declares a pointless war, loses and is subsequently depose results in the population rethinking things. But they somehow decided Gaultieri was evil and corrupt but attacking the UK and invading the Falklands was justified somehow and that the British are the “pirates”

Where Spain went, civilization and culture spread, and those lands become prosperous Where England went, treachery and corruptions spread, and those lands become divided Why was this the case historically?

Britishers literally used to rule the world when their empire was majority Indian

How can atheists exist?: I can understand those who don’t believe in the divinity of Christ. It requires quite literally, a leap of faith. But materialist atheism just looks laughable to me. How can the universe will itself into being from nothing? How can consciousness, which seems to go against the very basics of entropy, exist, never mind question itself and the universe it exists in and understand reason, exist? Simply, why is there nothing rather than something? Claiming the universe came from a preceding reality that collapsed inwards, or that it is some multiverse just kicks the can down the road? What created that? No matter how well the scientific method is refined and how much money is thrown at the research, I don’t think this fundamental question will ever be answered in a purely mechanistic self causing framework. To me it seems logically impossible, and to me the answer is simple. The universe came into being from something greater than it, outside the existence of it. Outside our framework. The buck has to stop somewhere. And that would be at an unmoved mover. A first principle. Pure act and being. Something eternally existent. Even leading cosmologists, philosophers and scientists don’t take it as serious. At the least, they have to concede some sort of deism.

The Jesus Deception: Why didn't any contemporary gentiles write about the creator of the cosmos allegedly walking around the jewish province and performing supernatural miracles and revealing divine knowledge to his jewish people? Were they just too anti-semitic?

I’m going to post this every day until you remember it

What does /his/ think of the Yasukuni Shrine?

When and why did tan become a white beauty standard?

Prove God: Prove God exists in 1 sentence.

.