First launched in 2012, it's been stress tested in tens of thousands of conversations with more than ten million participants worldwide. By collecting and analyzing viewpoints from thousands of participants, Polis reveals points of consensus, even on topics that seem deadlocked.
Polis has become part of the national democratic infrastructure in Taiwan, the UK, and Finland. Taiwan has used it to craft legislation on issues ranging from Uber regulation to revenge porn and online liquor sales; the UK has employed it for national security consultations; and Finland's wellbeing services counties β regional bodies responsible for health and social services β use Polis to design programs like support for elderly safety and mental health services for children, based on what citizens say they need. Governments in Singapore and the Philippines have also adopted the platform, while in Austria, the Klimarat (the National Citizensβ Assembly on Climate) used Polis to bring together thousands of citizens and experts to develop climate proposals.
At the local level, Amsterdam, Bowling Green, Kentucky, and multiple UK cities have used Polis to improve residents' lives. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) deployed it for what it called "the largest online deliberative exercises in history," engaging 30,000 youth across Bhutan, East Timor, and Pakistan.
Polis is designed, engineered, and maintained by The Computational Democracy Project (CompDem), a U.S.-based 501(c)(3). The tool has been featured in MIT Technology Review, Wired, The Economist, and The New York Times, and in BBC and PBS documentaries.
CompDem is now introducing Polis 2.0, an enhanced version of the original Polis 1.0 platform. This upgraded system combines massive participation capacity β supporting millions of simultaneous participants β with automated mapping of hundreds of thousands of individual viewpoints, real-time LLM-generated summaries, and the ability to keep conversations open indefinitely.
Polis 2.0 achieves this transformative scale through four key mechanisms:
Polis is βseededβ with a set of statements that participants can βagree,β βdisagree,β or βpassβ on.
Polis 2.0 accepts multiple input types. The primary format is short statements (1-3 sentences), optimized for mobile voting β most are generated directly by participants.
Other input formats can be pre-processed using an LLM and entered via CSV:
Polis 2.0 includes multiple systems for managing participant identity and growth:
On Polis 2.0 participants can:
Multi-lingual capabilities: The system detects a participantβs browser language and automatically translates the UI text and statements into their preferred language. Participants can submit statements in any language and view all statements both in the default language and in their chosen language.
Polis conversations with tens of thousands of participant-entered statements require effective moderation. Polis 2.0 includes AI-assisted moderation features to support this:
Human Oversight (recommended):
In addition, the statement routing system functions as a form of moderation by determining the optimal presentation of statements to each participant.
Polis 2.0 Outputs
Comprehensive Topic and Opinion Mapping: Polis 2.0 maps the conversation by identifying popular topics, subtopics and their interconnections, areas of consensus, and points of disagreement.
Consensus Statements: For each topic and subtopic, the platform generates collective statements that reflect agreement across all groups, supported by the underlying comments and votes. These statements represent authentic consensus rather than imposed compromise.
Automated Narrative Report Generation: Polis 2.0 generates automated narrative reports and can draw on multiple LLM models. Reports cover the entire conversation or focus on specific topics and subtopics. The platform employs statistical grounding, prompt engineering, and evaluations to ensure high-quality summaries, with each clause in the report including citations for easy human verification.
Data Repository: All data remains accessible for ongoing reference and further analysis