SBS Dateline Australia did a documentary about the assassination in 2011, and in the documentary, an Australian investigator who was dispatched by the UN also thought it was Hezbollah, but never officially proved it (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kOfF3bRlH4). No one has ever been formally convicted of the crime, people only speculate that Hezbollah and Syria are behind the assassination. Based on a conversation I recently had, I have my doubts. I have described my conversation and theory below about why I think they are not responsible.
So I got into a conversation with someone on a different sub today, and we were talking about Middle Eastern issues. He told me he was in Paris 20 years ago, and he met two Lebanese men when he was at a sushi bar in Paris, and they talked for hours at the sushi bar. The two men told them that one of them worked for Lebanon's "secret service" and the other was in charge of "customs" in Lebanon. These two Lebanese men told him that "their cooperation (at the time) with Israel was closer than most other countries in the middle east." They also told him that they really liked American Secretary of State.
Now, I told this man that it was unusual that the head of Lebanon's "secret service" in the year 2000 would be closely cooperating with Israel, as the Syrian government was controlling the Lebanese government at the time, and Syria hated Israel, and 2000 was also the year that Hezbollah drove Israel out of South Lebanon. The man told me that the head of Lebanon's secret service "was very specific about their relationship with Israel." I know Michel Aoun was in exile at the time, so I showed him a picture of Michel Aoun in 2005, and asked if this was the man who he spoke to, and he said no. I then wondered if it could have been agents of the South Lebanon Army, but I did not really pursue this lead.
I instead googled the term "Lebanon Secret Service," and the first thing that came up was "Lebanese State Security." So, I googled "Lebanese State Security," and went to its formal website. I found who was the head of Lebanon's State Security from 1998-2005, and there was picture of this man on the website (it was a picture of him as an old man, like a picture taken recently). So I shared the photo of this man, and asked him if this was the man he spoke to at the sushi bar in Paris. He then responded to me by saying, "Do you know when that pic was taken? The name and face look familiar but I recall his hair being much darker." So, I found a picture of the head of Lebanese State Security in 1998, and shared it with him and asked him if this was the man, and he responded, "It was 20 years ago, but it sure looks like it could be the same person! Crazy!"
So, based on all of the information I have compiled, these are the conclusions I have come to, and the theories I have developed. The head of Lebanese State Security at the time was working for Israel. I have come to this conclusion based on the conversation this man I spoke to had with him, and also from the passage in the book I have cited in the paragraph above with the "Google Books" link in which President Lahoud expresses that he did not like this man and wanted him gone. My question is, why would President Lahoud want him gone? Perhaps he did not trust him and was suspicious of him.
Today, it is thought that Rafik Hariri was assassinated by Hezbollah. I have strong doubts about this. In the article in Irish Times I have cited in one of the above paragraphs, numerous pro-Syrian figures in the Lebanese government were blamed for Hariri's assassination, and one of the was the head of "Lebanese State Security" (the article calls it "military intelligence," but the guy has the same name) that I have been writing about. My theory is that this man is responsible for the assassination of Rafik Hariri.
I suspect that he colluded with Israel to assassinate Hariri, and as a result of him colluding with Israel, all the pro-Syrian Lebanese figures were blamed because he was a part of them. Think about it. This guy had cooperated with Israel in past (as the Paris encounter proved), and Israel was desperate for Hezbollah to disarm its weapons. Israel wanted the world to think that Hezbollah was a threat to Lebanon internally and was a violent threat to Lebanon's democracy and Hezbollah's political opponents inside Lebanon. So, what better way than to assassinate Hariri, who was a political opponent of Hezbollah. This way, the world would think that Hezbollah does not respect the Lebanese people, and therefore the world would put an excessive amount of pressure on Hezbollah to disarm (as we have seen the past 15 years).
So, I think this head of state security in 2005 colluded with Israel to assassinate Hariri so Hezbollah and Syria would be framed, because this would help Israel on the international stage and hurt Hezbollah and Syria.
What do you think?